Blog Entries [10 - 19]Monday, April 8, 2024
Speaking of Which
I don't have much time to work with this week. Writing this on
Friday, I expect that the links below will be spotty. I also doubt
that I'll have many records in the next Music Week, although that
can run if I have any at all.
My company left Saturday morning, headed to Arkansas
for a better view of the eclipse on Monday, so I finally got a bit
of time to work on this. I collected a few links to get going, then
spent most of Sunday writing my "one point here" introduction, and
adding a few more links. I got a little over half way through my
usual source tabs before I had to call it a day. On Monday, I tried
to pick up where I had left off -- not going back to the tabs I had
hit on Sunday, but picking up the occasional Monday post as I went
along. Wound up with a pretty full post, dated Monday. I marked this
paragraph as an add, because it's a revision to my original intro.
This should go up before I go to bed Monday night. Music Week
will follow later Tuesday. Very little in it from before Saturday,
but I've found a few interesting records while working on this.
But I do want to make one point here, which is something I've been
thinking about for a while now.
I've come to conclude that many of us made a fundamental error
in the immediate aftermath of October 7 in blaming Hamas (or more
generally, Palestinians) for the outbreak of violence. Even those
of us who immediately feared that Israel would strike back with a
massive escalation somehow felt like we had to credit Hamas with
agency and moral responsibility -- if not for the retaliation, at
least for their own acts. But what choice did they have? What else
could they have done?
But there is an alternate view, which is that violent resistance
is an inevitable consequence of systematic marginalization, where
nonviolent remedies are excluded, and order is violently enforced.
How can we expect anyone to suffer oppression without fighting back?
So why don't we recognize blowback as intrinsic to the context, and
therefore effectively the responsibility of the oppressor? I don't
doubt that Israelis were terrified on October 7. They were, after
all, looking at a mirror of their own violence.
It's pretty obvious why Israel's leaders wanted to genocide. The
Zionist movement was born in a world that was racist, nationalist,
and imperialist -- traits that Zionists embraced, hoping to forge
them into a defensive shield, which worked just as well as a cudgel
to impose their will on others. What distinguishes them from Nazis
is that they're less driven to enslave or exterminate enemy races,
but that mostly means they see no use for others. In theory, they'd
be satisfied just to drive the others out -- as they did with the
Nakba -- but in practice their horizons expand as the settlements
grow.
The question isn't: why genocide? That's been baked in from the
beginning. The question is why they didn't do it before, and why
they think they can get away with it now. The "why not" is bound
to be speculative, and I don't want to delve very deep here, but I
can imagine trying to sort it out on two axes, one for the people,
the other for the cutting-edge political leaders. For the people,
the scale runs from respect for one's humanity, and dehumanizing
others. Most Israelis used to take pride in their high morality,
but war and militarism broke that down (with ultra-orthodoxy and
capitalism also taking a toll). As for the leaders, the scale is
based on power: the desire to push the envelope of possibility,
balanced off by the need to maintain good will with allies.
Ben Gurion was a master at both: a guy who took as much as he
could (even overreaching in 1956 and having to retreat), and was
always plotting ahead to take even more (as his followers did in
1967, meeting less resistance from Johnson). Begin pushed even
further, although he too had to retreat from Lebanon under Carter
before he found a more compliant Reagan. Netanyahu is another one
who constantly tested the limits of American allowance, only to
find that Trump and Biden were pushovers, offering no resistance
at all. Genocide only became possible as Palestinians came to be
viewed by most Israelis as subhuman, while Netanyahu found his
power to be unlimited by American sensitivity.
So, while Israel has always been at risk of turning genocidal,
what's really changed is America, turning from the "good neighbor"
FDR promised to Eisenhower's "leader of the free world" to Reagan's
capitalist scam artists to Bush's "global war on terror" to the
Trump-Biden cha-cha. I chalk this up to several things. The drift
to the right made Americans meaner and politicians more cynical and
corrupt. The neocons came to dominate foreign policy, with their cult
for power that could be rapidly and arbitrarily deployed anywhere --
as Israel did in their small region, Bush would around the globe.
The counter-intifada in Israel and the US wars on terror drove both
countries further into the grip of dehumanizing militarism, opening
up an opportunity for Netanyahu to forge a right-wing alliance with
America, while AIPAC held Democrats like Obama and Biden in check.
Trump automatically rubber-stamped anything Netanyahu wanted, and
Biden had no will power to do anything but.
By the time October 7 came around, Americans couldn't so much as
articulate a national interest in peace and social justice. But
there was also one specific thing that kept Americans from seeing
genocide as such: we had totally bought into the idea that Hamas,
as exemplary terrorists, were intrinsically evil, could never be
negotiated with, and therefore all you could do to stop them is to
kill as many as you can. It wasn't a novel idea. America has a sordid
history of assassination plots until the mid-1970s, when the Church
Committee exposed that history and forced reforms. But Israel's own
assassination programs expanded continuously from the 1980s on, and
American neocons envied Israel's prowess. Under Bush, "high value
targets" became currency, and Obama not only followed suit, he upped
the game -- most notably bagging Osama Bin Laden.
There's a Todd Snider line: "In America, we like our bad guys
dead." That's an understatement. Dead has become the only way we
can imagine their stories ending. We long ago gave up on the notion
that enemies can be rehabilitated. In large part, this reflects a
loss of faith in justice, replaced by sheer power, the belief that
we are right because we have the might to force them to tow the
line. That was the attitude that Europe took to the South in the
19th century. That was the attitude Germany and Japan made World
War with.
That attitude was discredited -- Germany and Japan were allowed
to recover as free and peaceful nations; Africa and Asia decolonized;
the capitalist world integrated, first with a stable divide from the
communists, then by further engagement. There were problems. The US
was magnanimous to defeated Germany and Japan, but in turning against
the Soviet Union, and in assuming security responsibility for the
former European colonies, and in maintaining capitalist hegemony
over them, Americans lost their faith in democracy and justice, and
embraced power for its own sake. And when that failed, they turned
vindictive toward Korea, Vietnam, Cuba, and elsewhere.
The Israelis were adept students of power. They learned directly
from the British colonial system, with its divide-and-conquer politics,
and its use of collective punishment. They worked with the British to
defeat the Palestinian revolt of 1937-39, and against the British in
1947-48. They drew lessons from the Nazis. They learned to play games
with the world powers, especially with the US. Trita Parsi's book,
Treacherous Alliance, is a case study of how they played Iran
off for leverage elsewhere, especially with the US. The neocons, with
their Israel envy, were especially easy to play.
So when October 7 happened, all the necessary prejudices and
reflexive operators were aligned. Hamas were the perfect villains:
they had their roots in the Muslim Brotherhood, which qualified
them as Islamists, close enough to the Salafis and Deobandis who
Americans had branded as terrorists even before 9/11; they had
become rivals with the secular PLO within the Occupied Territories,
especially after Israel facilitated Arafat's return under the Oslo
Accords -- a rivalry which led them to become more militant against
Israel, which Israel intensified by assassinating their leaders;
when they finally did decide to run for elections, they won but
the results were disallowed, leading to them seizing power in
Gaza, which Israel then blockaded, "put on a diet," and "mowed
the grass" in a series of punishing sieges and incursions; along
the way, Hamas managed to get a small amount of aid from Iran, so
found themselves branded as an Iranian proxy, like Hezbollah in
Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen -- Israel knew that any hint of
Iranian influence would drive the Americans crazy.
Not only was Hamas the perfect enemy, Israel and the United
States had come to believe that terrorists were irrational and
fanatical, that they could never be negotiated with, and that
the only way to deal with them was by systematically killing off
their cadres and especially their leaders until they were reduced
to utter insignificance. The phrase Israelis used was that their
goal was to make Palestinians realize that they were "an utterly
defeated people." When I first heard that phrase, a picture came
to mind, of the last days of the American Indian campaigns, when
the last Sioux and Apache surrendered to be kept as helpless
dependents on wasteland reservations.
On its founding, Israel kept a British legal system that was
designed to subjugate native populations, to surveil them, and to
arbitrarily arrest and punish anyone they suspected of disloyalty.
They discriminated legally against natives, limiting their economic
prospects, curtailing their freedom, and punishing them harshly,
including collective punishments -- a system which instilled fear
of each against the other, where every disobedient act became an
excuse for harsher and more sweeping mistreatment.
After Hamas took control of Gaza, those punishments were often
delivered by aircraft, wielding 2,000-pound bombs that could flatten
whole buildings. Hamas responded with small, imprecise rockets, of
no military significance but symbolic of defiance, a way of saying
we can still reach beyond your walls. Israel always responded with
more shelling and bombing, a dynamic that repeatedly escalated until
the horror started to turn world opinion against Israel. Having made
their point, Israel could then ease off, until the next opportunity
or provocation sent them on the warpath again.
The October 7 "attack" -- at the time, I characterized it, quite
accurately I still think, as a jail break followed by a brief crime
spree. In short order, Israel killed most of the "attackers," and
resealed the border. The scale, in terms of the numbers of Israelis
killed or captured was much larger than anything Palestinians had
previously managed, and the speed was even more striking, but the
overall effect was mostly symbolic, and the threat of more violence
coming from Gaza dissipated almost immediately. Israel had no real
need to counterattack. They could have easily negotiated a prisoner
swap -- Israel had many times more Palestinians in jail than Hamas
took as hostages, and had almost unlimited power to add to their
numbers. But Israel's leaders didn't want peace. They wanted to
reduce Palestinians to "an utterly defeated people." And since
there was no way to do that other than to kill most of them and
drive the rest into exile -- basically a rerun of the Nakba, only
more intense, because having learned that lesson, Palestinians
would cling even more tenaciously to their homeland.
That's why the immediate reaction of Israel's leaders was to
declare their intent to commit genocide. The problem with that
idea was that since the Holocaust, any degree of genocide had
become universally abhorrent. To proceed, Israel had to keep the
war going, and to keep it going, they had to keep their ideal
enemy alive, long enough to do major devastation, making Gaza
unlivable for anywhere near the 2.3 million people who managed
to live through decades of hardships there, with starvation
playing a major role in decimating the population.
In order to commit genocide, Israel had to supplement its
killing machinery with a major propaganda offensive, because
they remembered that what finally stopped their major wars of
1948-49, 1956, 1967, and 1973, and their periodic assaults on
Lebanon and Gaza, was public opinion, especially in America.
But Netanyahu knew how to push America's buttons. He declared
that the only thing Israel could do to protect itself -- the
one thing Israel had to do in order to keep this mini-Holocaust
from ever happening again -- was to literally kill everyone in
Hamas.
And Americans fell for that line, completely. They believed
that Hamas were intractably evil terrorists, and they knew that
terrorists cannot be appeased or even negotiated with. And they
trusted that Israelis knew what they were doing and how best to
do it, so all they really had to do was to provide support and
diplomatic cover, giving Israel the time and tools to do the job
as best they saw fit. And sure, there would be some collateral
damage, because Hamas uses civilians as human shields -- it never
really occurring to Americans that those super-smart, super-moral
Israelis can't actually tell the difference between Hamas and
civilians even if they wanted to, which most certainly they do
not. And if anything does look bad, Israel can always come up
with a cover story good enough for Americans to believe. After
all, Americans have a lot of practice believing their own atrocity
cover up stories.
The hostage situation turned out to be really useful for keeping
the spectre of Hamas alive. There is no real way for Americans to
evaluate how much armed defense Hamas is still capable of in Gaza --
their capability to attack beyond the walls was depleted instantly
as they shot their wad on October 7 -- so the only reliable "proof
of existence" of Hamas is when their allies show up for meetings
in Qatar and Cairo. And there's no chance of agreement, as the only
terms Israel is offering is give up all the hostages, surrender, and
die. But by showing up, they affirm that Hamas still exists, and by
refusing to surrender, they remind the Americans that the only way
this can end is by killing them all.
And while that charade is going on, Israel continues to kill
indiscriminately, to destroy everything, to starve, to render
Gaza unlivable. And they will continue to do so, until enough of
us recognize their real plan is genocide, and we shame them into
stopping. We are making progress in that direction, as we can
see as Biden starts to waver in his less and less enthusiastic
support, but we still have a long ways to go.
The key to making more progress will be to break down several
of the myths Israel has spun. In particular, we have to abandon
the belief that we can solve all our problems by killing everyone
who disagrees with us. Second, we need to understand that killing
or otherwise harming people only causes further resentment and
resistance. People drunk on power tend to ignore this, but it's
really not a difficult or novel idea: as Rabbi Hillel put it,
"That which is hateful unto you, do not do to your neighbor."
Moreover, we need to understand that negotiated agreement
between responsible parties is much preferable to the diktat
of a single party, no matter how powerful that party is. It's
not clear to me that Israel needs to negotiate an agreement
with Hamas, because it's not clear to me that Hamas is the
real and trusted agent of the people of Palestine or Gaza,
but some group needs to emerge as the responsible party, and
the more solid their footing, the better partner they can be.
Israel, like the British before them, has always insisted on
picking its favored Palestinian representatives, while making them
look foolish, corrupt, and/or ineffective. Arafat may only have
been the latter, but by not allowing him to accomplish anything,
Israel opened up the void that Hamas tried to fill. But Hamas has
only had the power it was able to seize by force, and even then
was severely limited by what Israel would allow, in a perverse
symbiotic relationship that we could spend a lot of time on --
Israel has often found Hamas to be very useful, so their current
view that Hamas has to be exterminated seems more like a line to
be fed to the Americans, who tend to take good vs. evil ever so
literally.
Initial count: 217 links, 12,552 words.
Top story threads:
Israel:
Mondoweiss: Probably the best of the day-by-day reports,
but once again they took the weekend off. Too bad Israel didn't.
[04-01]
Day 178: Israel withdraws from al-Shifa Hospital, leaving evidence
of a massacre in its wake: "Dozens of bodies are still being
recovered from the rubble of a destroyed and burnt al-Shifa Hospital,
following a two-week Israeli raid and siege on the hospital." After
missing over the weekend, this invaluable series returns.
[04-02]
Day 179: Israel kills 7 international aid workers in central Gaza,
passes law banning Al Jazeera: "The World Central Kitchen called
the attack that killed seven of its aid workers 'unforgivable' as
Israeli forces killed 71 people across the Gaza Strip. Meanwhile,
the Israeli government voted to approve a bill banning Al Jazeera."
[04-03]
Day 180: Israel calls killing of WCK workers 'mistake,' UN reports
at least 195 aid workers killed since October 7: "Israeli media
says the World Central Kitchen aid team was intentionally targeted
with three missiles, as an UN expert says the strike shows Israel
aims to force aid organizations out of Gaza."
[04-04]
Day 181: Child deaths in Gaza on the rise, hostage negotiations
'stuck': "WHO chief Ghebreyesus said he was 'appalled' at the
destruction of al-Shifa Hospital. Meanwhile, pressure on Netanyahu
increases domestically to strike a hostage deal with Hamas as the
UN Human Rights Council considers an arms embargo against Israel."
[04-05]
Day 182: Israel says it will 'temporarily' allow aid into Gaza:
"Following international outcry at the targeting of World Central
Kitchen aid workers, Israel said that it would 'temporarily' allow
aid into Gaza. Meanwhile, Israeli forces raided the al-Aqsa Mosque
compound and killed a Palestinian man in Tulkarem."
Al Jazeera:
Yuval Abraham: [04-03]
'Lavender': The AI machine directing Israel's bombing spree in Gaza:
"The Israeli army has marked tens of thousands of Gazans as suspects
for assassination, using an AI targeting system with little human
oversight and a permissive policy for casualties."
Linah Alsaafin: [04-03]
Israel's brutality is increasing -- and so is its denialism:
"The atrocities at Al-Shifa Hospital are clear, but Israeli
politicians say not a single civilian was killed. It's just
one of several outlandish claims Israel has made recently."
Eric Alterman: [04-02]
Banning Al Jazeera moves Israel one step closer to dictatorship.
Tareq Baconi: [04-01]
The two-state solution is an unjust, impossible fantasy. This
is accurate as far as it goes:
Repeating the two-state solution mantra has allowed policymakers to
avoid confronting the reality that partition is unattainable in the
case of Israel and Palestine, and illegitimate as an arrangement
originally imposed on Palestinians without their consent in 1947. And
fundamentally, the concept of the two-state solution has evolved to
become a central pillar of sustaining Palestinian subjugation and
Israeli impunity. The idea of two states as a pathway to justice has
in and of itself normalized the daily violence meted out against
Palestinians by Israel's regime of apartheid.
The key thing you need to understand here is that Israel has
never offered the only thing that makes two states possible, which
is complete independence. Given this, we should admit that Israel
has never made an honest two-state offer. Moreover, Israel has
always managed to scuttle third-party two-state solutions, and
that's happened often enough that no one should credit them as
serious possibilities.
Also:
A single state from the river to the sea might appear unrealistic or
fantastical or a recipe for further bloodshed. But it is the only
state that exists in the real world -- not in the fantasies of
policymakers. The question, then, is: How can it be transformed into
one that is just?
Back in 1947, when the UK gave up on its mandate in Palestine,
the logical solution would have been to allow a democratic government
to be formed, with constitutional safeguards to protect minorities.
Whether such a state would be fair and just is a counterfactual we
can only speculate on. The population at the time was divided about
2-to-1 Muslims over Jews, with a small Christian minority. The Jews
wanted to rule, and being outnumbered lobbied for partition, so they
could establish a state and military, for defense and expansion if
the opportunity arose. Muslims and Christians were disorganized --
deliberately by the British, especially while suppressing the 1937-39
revolt -- so it's unclear what they wanted (anything from liberal
social democracy to theocracy was possible, but Jews had reason to
be wary, given that the revolt was largely triggered by opposition
to their immigration, and that nominal leader -- initially appointed
by the British -- Hajj Amin al-Husseini had taken refuge in Nazi
Germany after the revolt failed).
British colonial rule was built on divide-and-conquer politics,
reinforced by savage collective punishment, and that fed into a
fondness for partition strategies, which had already proven to be
disastrous in Ireland and in India. Britain also retained a large
degree of control in the nominally independent Arab monarchies of
Jordan, Egypt, and Iraq, which in theory attacked Israel on its
declaration of independence in 1948, but actually moved to deny
Palestinians sovereignty in their allotted partition (reduced in
size by Israeli military gains, and increased in population by
fleeing refugees).
Even if one doubts that a Palestinian majority in 1947 would
have established a fair and just single state, especially one
that would have allowed for further Jewish immigration from a
still-ravaged Europe, why not pursue such a solution now? The
Israeli position is that such an idea is a "non-starter," as it
would mark the end of the Zionist dream of a safe haven for Jews
from everywhere. The assumption seems to be that if power ever
shifted from Jews to Arabs -- which is neither inevitable nor
impossible given current demographics and trends -- that the
Arabs would treat the Jews as badly as the Jews have treated
the Arabs since 1948. I doubt that would happen, but to allay
such fears, there are ways to design safeguards while still
allowing a vast expansion of personal freedom for Palestinians.
The biggest problem is that Israelis, especially those in the
settler movement, are accustomed to living with state support
for their hatred and violence, and they will resist any change.
Hence, it is imperative to convince Israelis that profound change
is the only way to recover their bearings as respectable people.
That task is at least as difficult as convincing George Wallace's
Alabama to accept civil rights, and as difficult as convincing
Oklahoma to stop stealing Indian lands. Neither of those cases
worked out as well as one hoped, but at least we realized that
continued unfair and unjust treatment would only perpetuate
hostilities that would ultimately hurt everyone.
Ramzy Baroud: [04-08]
Irremediable defeat: On Israel's other unwinnable war: "Historically,
wars unite Israelis. Not anymore."
The problems continue to pile up, and Netanyahu, the master politician
of former times, is now only hanging by the thread of keeping the war
going for as long as possible to defer his mounting crises for as long
as possible.
Yet, an indefinite war is not an option, either. The Israeli economy,
according to recent data by the country's Central Bureau of Statistics,
has shrunk by over 20 percent in the fourth quarter of 2023. It is
likely to continue its free fall in the coming period.
Moreover, the army is struggling, fighting an unwinnable war without
realistic goals. The only major source for new recruits can be obtained
from ultra-Orthodox Jews, who have been spared the battlefield to study
in yeshivas, instead.
70 percent of all Israelis, including many in Netanyahu's own party,
want the Haredi to join the army. On March 28, the Supreme Court ordered
a suspension of state subsidies allocated to these ultra-Orthodox
communities.
If that is to happen, the crisis will deepen on multiple fronts.
If the Haredi lose their privileges, Netanyahu's government is likely
to collapse; if they maintain them, the other government, the post
Oct-7 war council, is likely to collapse as well.
In 1967, Israel conquered the near world -- larger professional
armies with tanks and aircraft -- in six days. Now, with at least
ten times the firepower, they've spent six months demolishing
housing and hospitals, just to root out a few thousand Hamas
lightly-armed "militants," and have little to show for it but
shame and disgrace.
Nora Berman: [03-29]
'The most moral army in the world' is posing with Palestinian women's
underwear in Gaza.
Connor Echols: [04-02]
US, Israeli attacks on UNRWA push agency toward collapse.
Or Kashti: [03-24]
Oct. 7 Hamas attack is tearing apart Israeli human rights group
B'Tselem:
B'Tselem
is a very important Israeli non-profit which has done vital work
in documenting the atrocities committed by Israelis against
Palestinians since its founding in 1989. They were quick to
call for a ceasefire after Oct. 7, but this was complicated by
internal divisions over how much blame to direct at Hamas, and
whether to echo propaganda points which were used to justify
Israel's genocidal counter-attack. I'm having trouble following
this piece, but noted that the divide led to the resignation
of Eyal Hareuveni, who I know mostly as a jazz critic. This
also led me to:
Joshua Keating:
Takeshi Kumon: [03-20]
Israeli startups hope to export battle-tested AI military tech:
I got this link from a Naomi Klein
tweet, who added: "not mere disaster capitalism -- genocide
capitalism."
Gideon Levy: [04-07]
In six months in Gaza, Israel's worst-ever war achieved nothing but
death and destruction.
Alice Markham-Cantor: [04-02]
'The drones are shooting at anything that moves' in Gaza; "Facing
famine, civilians search desperately for food under the threat of
Israeli bombs."
Jack Mirkinson: [04-04]
The ghoulish ostentatiousness of Israel's latest war crimes: "It's
as if Israel is flaunting its ethnic cleansing of Palestinians."
The past few days of Israel's war on Gaza have been hard to bear.
In quick succession, the world watched Israel withdraw from the
Al-Shifa hospital complex, revealing stomach-churning scenes of
death and destruction; bomb Iran's embassy in Syria, which could
escalate the conflict across the Middle East; and kill seven
humanitarian aid workers with World Central Kitchen (WCK) in what
even some US officials said appeared to be intentional air
strikes. . . .
The assault on Gaza has been horrific from the start. But it is
hard to shake the feeling that the near-total leeway Israel has
been granted by the United States and its allies has gone to its
head. Bulldozing bodies in plain sight. Bombing diplomatic facilities.
Targeting aid workers from the most Washington-friendly relief
organization. There is a ghoulish, ostentatious quality to these
actions. It's as if Israel is showing off, flaunting its ability
to cross every known line of international humanitarian law and
get away with it.
James North:
Rick Perlstein: [02-21]
The neglected history of the state of Israel: "The Revisionist
faction of Zionism that ended up triumphing adhered to literal fascist
doctrines and traditions."
Mitchell Plitnick: [04-05]
Netanyahu's endgame and the Israeli far-right's regional ambitions:
"The events of recent days suggest we may be seeing the Israeli endgame
take shape. Netanyahu's far right government's goals are not limited to
Gaza: it wants to take over all of Palestine and start a war with
Hezbollah and Iran as well." I wouldn't call this an "endgame," as
I doubt that the far-right wants the games to end. They thrive on
violence and hatred, and want to keep it going.
Will Porter: [04-08]
Israel lets AI decide who dies in Gaza.
Vijay Prashad: [04-05]
How Israel weaponizes water: "Even before Israel's most recent
attack on Gaza, 97 percent of the water in the sole coastal aquifer
of Gaza was already unsafe for human consumption."
Dave Reed: [04-05]
Engineering social collapse in Palestine: "Despite its claim that
the goal of the war in Gaza is the elimination of Hamas, Israel's
actions reveal its true intention: the collapse of Palestinian
society."
Mouin Rabbani:
All shook up: Regional dynamics of the Gaza War: This is a
chapter from the first significant book to come out about the
Gaza war since October 7,
Deluge: Gaza and Israel From Crisis to Cataclysm, edited
by Jamie Stern-Weiner (OR Books).
Richard Silverstein:
Norman Solomon: [04-03]
When an escalation in war isn't newsworthy to the New York Times:
"Why is the Times ignoring the latest huge transfer of 2,000-pound
bombs from the US to Israel?"
Jeffrey St Clair: [04-05]
Incident on the Al-Rashid Coastal Road: "In the anodyne language
of military slaughter, it's called a 'triple tap' -- three successive
strikes to make sure you've eliminated your target -- the target in
this case being the occupants of three vehicles of the World Central
Kitchen."
Noga Tarnopolsky: [04-07]
Israelis are hostages of Netanyahu: "With the prime minister still
refusing to resign, every day feels like October 7."
Amanda Taub: [04-02]
Israel bombed an Iranian embassy complex. Is that allowed?
Well, when you ask the New York Times, you're liable to get: "Israel
can likely argue that its actions did not violate international law's
protections for diplomatic missions, experts say."
Ishaan Tharoor:
Peter Wade: [04-07]
José Andrés: Israel is conducting a 'war against humanity itself':
"'The [World Central Kitchen] convoy was deliberately attacked, it was
obvious . . . This was targeted,' the humanitarian chef said of the
killing of seven aid workers in Gaza."
Brett Wilkins:
Robert Wright: [04-05]
How the US media encourages Bibi's dangerous brinksmanship.
Oren Ziv: [04-05]
Israeli teen jailed for refusing draft: 'I'm willing to pay a price
for my principles': Ben Arad.
Israel vs. world opinion:
Mohammad Jehad Ahmad: [04-04]
Zionists have tried to silence me through doxing and intimidation.
"A Palestinian teacher describes being targeted by Zionist groups with
doxing and public harassment. He urges the New York City Chancellor of
Education to take action before it turns violent."
José Andrés: [04-03]
Let people eat.
Michael Arria:
Samer Badawi: [04-02]
Even without a UN veto, Gaza remains hostage to American power:
"The downplaying of the Security Council's ceasefire resolution
shows why the world can no longer look to Washington as the arbiter
of a rules-based order."
Mayar Darawsha: [04-03]
Judge Aharon Barak is repeating Israeli propaganda at the ICJ:
Israel was able to appoint Barak as an "ad-hoc judge" on the ICJ,
but he's "less like a judge and more like a mouthpiece for official
Israeli propaganda."
Lawrence Davidson: [04-04]
Sick cultures: When belief systems turn pathological: Comparative
examples, from the US and Israel.
David French: [04-07]
Israel is making the same mistake America made in Iraq:
Americans may be impressed by this argument, but Israelis won't be:
Think of those words: "renewed insurgency." That means Israel was
doing exactly what we did for much of the Iraq war -- fighting again
over ground we had presumably already seized. And the sad reality of
those terrible battles reminded me of a seemingly counterintuitive
truth: In the fight against terrorists, providing humanitarian aid
isn't just a moral imperative; it's a military necessity.
The terrible civilian toll and looming famine in Gaza are a human
tragedy that should grieve us all; they are also directly relevant
to the outcome of the war. A modern army like Israel's can absolutely
defeat Hamas in a direct confrontation, regardless of whether it
provides aid to civilians. But as we've learned in our own wars
abroad, it cannot preserve its victory unless it meets Gazans' most
basic needs.
Israel has an answer to complaints like this: you don't have to
win hearts & minds if you simply kill everyone. The Americans
never considered that option in Iraq. Bush even fantasized that he
was liberating people, and that they'd respond by thanking him.
Netanyahu doesn't imagine that for a moment. He knows deep in his
bones that Palestinians will never forgive him. He knows they'll
remember him as long as Israelis remember Masada. So what if every
martyr he kills produces another one. That's just more Palestinians
he needs to kill. As long as the net kill ratio is positive, he's
good.
Kelly Garrity: [04-08]
Elizabeth Warren says she believes Israel's war in Gaza will legally
be considered genocide.
Melvin Goodman: [04-05]
Meet the newest apologist for Israel: Rear Admiral John Kirby:
Spokesman for Biden's National Security Council.
Mel Gurtov: [04-06]
US complicity in Israel genocide takes another step.
David Hearst: [04 -07]
For the defenders of Israel's war on Gaza, the game is up:
"Staunch allies calling themselves friends of Israel are beginning
to realise they are also friends of the murderers of western aid
workers, friends of genocide and friends of fascism."
Chris Hedges: [04-02]
A genocide foretold: "The genocide in Gaza is the final stage
of a process begun by Israel decades ago."
Hebh Jamal: [04-07]
Germany is becoming a police state when it comes to Palestine
activism.
Jonathan Ofir: [04-06]
We Israelis are the biggest Holocaust deniers: "The Jewish state
learned that it can commit its own Holocaust in Gaza and deny that
it exists."
Ilan Pappé: [02-01]
It is dark before the dawn, but Israeli settler colonialism is at an
end: A talk given to Islamic Human Rights Commission (IHRC) on
their annual Genocide Memorial Day, by one of the premier historians
of Israel/Palestine. Also from the same issue:
James Ray: [04-07]
No, Senator Schumer, Netanyahu isn't the problem: "The problem
isn't just with Benjamin Netanyahu. It is with Zionist settler
colonialism." But it's been Netanyahu's meal ticket all along, so
he's an obvious symbol.
Alex Skopic: [04-04]
Israel's propaganda machine is filling the internet with misinformation:
"A sophisticated network of websites is spreading pro-Israel posts
and suppressing content that 'harms Israel's image.'"
Bret Stephens: [03-12]
Israel has no choice but to fight on: He's totally in the bag
for Netanyahu, so much so he thinks he can set up a mock argument
and expound on his position as brilliantly as Socrates. You'll be
hard-pressed to find a premise that makes sense, but his deductions
are even more far-fetched. "So what do you suggest the Biden
administration do? Help Israel win the war decisively so that
Israelis and Palestinians can someday win the peace." It's hard
to stop quoting this nonsense. Every line makes my blood boil,
less from disbelief that anyone could be this cruel and stupid
than from amazement that anyone could be so oblivious in their
arrogance.
Enzo Traverso: [04-06]
The Gaza massacre is undermining the culture of democracy.
Kathleen Wallace: [04-05]
The death of plausible deniability: An ethnic cleansing in real time.
Philip Weiss: [04-07]
Weekly Briefing; The sudden urgency of isolating a pariah state.
Many good points here, including his rejection of "three lies the
establishment is now telling about Palestine to justify not isolating
Israel:
- "If Netanyahu were gone Israel would behave differently." This is
"patently false."
- "We have to get back to preserving the path to a two-state solution."
He realizes this will never happen without radical change in Israel,
and counters: "We have to get to human dignity and equal rights, no
matter the political boundaries."
- "The Hamas atrocities of October 7 are unique and a cause for
war." Not so: "they were inevitable as the slave revolts of the
1830s in the U.S. They will happen again so long as Jewish supremacy
is the law for Palestinians."
America's increasingly desperate and pathetic empire:
Edward Hunt: [04-08]
An illegal war with Houthis isn't stopping the Red Sea crisis:
"US attacks in Yemen are dangerous and unnecessary. Any real solution
starts in Gaza."
William Leogrande: [04-02]
Watching US Cuba policy in the theater of the absurd.
Christopher Mott: [04-08]
Bibi's push for a long war undermines Israel's best friend -- America.
Vincent Ortiz: [04-06]
US sanctions on Iran are devastating and ineffective. Not the
words I would use, for while partly true they misread the political
dynamics on both sides. US sanctions actually reinforce the most
regressive factions in Iran. If the idea was to weaken them and to
encourage more accommodating factions, sure, they're ineffective.
But if the idea is to promote hostility that would bind neighbors,
like Saudi Arabia and Israel, more closely to the US and its arms
industries, then they're working splendidly. How "devastating"
the sanctions are to ordinary Iranians is less clear. They can
be, especially for small countries that depend on imports (like
Gaza), but large, self-contained economies (like Russia and Iran)
can hobble along indefinitely, while credibly blaming the US (as
opposed to their own incompetence) for shortages.
Trita Parsi: [04-08]
Iran says it won't strike Israel if US gets Gaza ceasefire.
Paul R Pillar: [04-05]
Is Israel's plan to draw the US into a war with Iran?
Nick Turse:
Adam Weinstein/Trita Parsi: [04-04]
Biden's inaction on Gaza puts US troops at risk.
Election notes: There were presidential primaries on April 2,
all won as expected by Biden and Trump:
Connecticut: Trump 77.9%, Biden 84.9%;
New York: Trump 82.1%, Biden 91.5%;
Rhode Island: Trump 84.5%, Biden 82.6%;
Wisconsin: Trump 79.2%, Biden 88.6%; also
Delaware has no vote totals, but gave all delegates to Trump and Biden.
The next primary will be in Pennsylvania on April 23.
Trump, and other Republicans:
Jonathan Allen/Matt Dixon/Garrett Haake: [04-07]
Trump tells billionaires he'll keep their taxes low at $50 million
fundraising gala.
Isaac Arnsdorf: [04-04]
How Steve Bannon guided the MAGA movement's rebound from Jan. 6.
Excerpt from the book,
Finish What We Started: The MAGA Movement's Ground War to End
Democracy.
Another review:
Zack Beauchamp: [04-06]
The right-wing scammers who paved the way for Trump: "A new
book shows how conservative grift started long before branded
bibles and $400 sneakers." Interview with Joe Conason, whose
book (not identified in the article, not out until July 9) is
The Longest Con: How Grifters, Swindlers, and Frauds Hijacked
American Conservatism. Needless to say, any book that starts
with Joe McCarthy and leads to Donald Trump has a lot of Roy Cohn
in the middle.
Luke Broadwater/Alan Feuer: [04-04]
GOP Congressman's wild claim: RBI entrapped Jan. 6 rioters:
Clay Higgins (R-LA).
Mark A Caputo: [04-02]
Trump won't commit on Florida abortion vote: "Sunshine state voters
will decide whether abortion belongs in the state constitution. But
one Florida Man won't weigh in on the 'A-word.'"
Jonathan Chait: [04-04]
Trump indifferent to Palestinian death, but moved by images of building
damage: "Another deranged interview."
Kyle Chayka: [04-03]
Trump's social-media Potemkin village: "After an IPO last week,
Truth Social is confronting the gaping incongruity between its
valuation and the paltry reality of its product."
Ryan Cooper:
[04-01]
Will voters hear about Donald Trump's deranged health care agenda?
"A second Trump term means tens of millions of people losing insurance
and chaos in hospitals."
[04-04]
The pious one, Donald Trump: "The least likely embodiment of
Christian virtues in American life is practically runnintg as an
evangelical minister." I find it interesting when people who don't
particularly believe in Christianity come around to defend the
decency of the religion's fundamental tenets from the embarrassing
depredations of the loudest Christians:
Indeed, in one of my favorite verses, Jesus says not only do you go
to Hell if you do not care for the hungry or sick, welcome the stranger,
and visit people in prison. He further says that if you do those things
for "the least of these brothers and sisters of mine" you are doing them
to Jesus Himself. It's a profoundly egalitarian sentiment -- not only
does God instruct Christians to help the worst-off in society, He
identifies Himself with the worst-off.
After all, this was Nietzsche's whole problem with Christianity. In
his view, it replaced the aristocratic "master morality" celebrating
power and domination with an egalitarian "slave morality" in which it
is wrong to oppress the weak.
David Corn:
Igor Derysh:
Chauncey DeVega: [04-02]
"Perfectly predictable": Dr John Gartner on why "a malignant
narcissist like Trump" sells Bibles: Gartner says, "It fits
perfectly into both his personality disorder's hypomanic grandiosity
and its paranoid sense of grievance." Gartner is one of several
interviewed for this review of Trump/Republicans' efforts to
politicize Easter.
Maureen Dowd:
Abdallah Fayyad: [04-04]
Trump has set up a perfect avenue for potential corruption: "With
Truth Social going public, big investors could easily buy influence
in a second Trump term."
Susan B Glasser: [04-04]
Donald Trump's amnesia advantage: "The 2024 race comes down to just
how much America has lost its collective mind about its disastrous
former President." I don't quite buy this argument. No doubt, the
people who expected Trump to be awful saw plenty to confirm their
fears. But, at least in the short term, how many of the people who
basically supported Trump were really disappointed? The economy
was increasingly inequal, but pretty solid until the pandemic hit,
and the Democrats bailed him out then, shoring up businesses and
protecting workers. But if you survived Covid -- and those who
didn't aren't in the equation any more -- you came out of it about
as well as you went in. Trump didn't just into new wars, and he
significantly withdrew from Afghanistan (while leaving Biden to
be blamed for the defeat he negotiated). Pollution and climate
are issues with longer-term impact, so unless you were aware at
the time, you're probably unaware still. Unless you pay close
attention, for most people there's little practical difference
regardless of who's president, so it makes sense that lots of
people will base their vote on charisma, style, and affinity --
with Trump, qualities you either love or hate.
Jeet Heer: [04-08]
His billionaire buddies' bribery bails out Trump, again and again:
"The problem isn't that the former president is broke but that he's
for sale."
Brian Karem: [04-04]
Trump's revenge against Julian Assange broke the media: "How
Trump's petty vindictiveness makes the media worse." I don't doubt
that the prosecution of Assange was meant to scare media outlets
away from exposing secrets, or that Trump is vindictive -- Obama
started on Assange, but Mike Pompeo was always his most rabid
inquisitor, and Pompeo's influence grew under Trump -- but the
media broke on several fracture lines, and the one Trump was most
directly responsible for was in capturing media attention for his
outrageous showboating, while decrying as "fake news" anything
that displeased him, and thereby making news out of "fake news."
Robert Kuttner: [04-02]
How Republicans screw workers: "Efforts by Obama and Biden to
enforce labor laws have been systematically undermined by right-wing
courts and legislators. This should be a prime election theme."
Amanda Marcotte:
Kelly McClure:
Dana Milbank: [04-05]
Trump swindles his followers again.
Anna North: [04-08]
Trump may sound moderate on abortion. The groups setting his agenda
definitely aren't.
Heather Digby Parton: [04-05]
Marjorie Taylor Greene is out for Republican blood: "House Speaker
Mike Johnson may have to be saved by Democrats after MTG is done with
him."
Ben Protess/Matthew Haag: [04-04]
New York Attorney General questions Trump's $175 million bond deal:
"Letitia James said in court papers that the California company providing
the guarantee was not qualified to do such deals in New York."
Rebecca Solnit: [04-02]
The Republican party has become a full-fledged anti-sex movement.
Michael Tomasky: [04-01]
The Trump double standard: He's the least persecuted pol in America:
"Anyone else who did all the Things Trump has done, or stands accused
of having done[*], the wheels of justice, legal and political, would
have moved more swiftly." [*] Why this disclaimer? "Innocent until
proven guilty" is a legal principle we should respect, but what he
actually did is a matter of well-established historical record.
There is uncertainty about when and how he will be punished (if at
all), but at least regarding what he's been charged with, the facts
are pretty clear.
Fareed Zakaria: [04-05]
How Trump fills a void in an increasingly secular America.
I've been reading Tricia Romano's oral history of The Village
Voice,
The
Freaks Came Out to Write, and ran into a section on Wayne
Barrett, who started reporting on Trump in the 1970s, and published
the first serious book on Trump in 1992. The discussion there is
worth quoting at some length (pp. 522-524):
TOM ROBBINS: Wayne appreciated the fact that Trump could be
a serious player, given his willingness to play the race card, which
was clear from his debut speech that he was gonna go after illegal
immigrants and Mexicans. As long as you're going to outwardly play
the race card in the Republican primary, you can actually command a
lot. And Wayne understood that. He was surprised as the rest of us the
way that Trump just mowed down the rest of the opposition and that
nobody could stand up to him.
WILLIAM BASTONE: He knew that Trump was appealing to
something that was going to have traction with people and that wasn't
just a passing thing. I said, "Wayne, don't you think people see
through this and they understand that he's really just a con man and a
huckster and a racist?" The stuff goes back, at that point, almost
thirty years with his father and avoiding renting apartments to Black
families in Brooklyn.
And he was like, "No, that's gonna be a plus for him, for the
people that he's going to end up attracting." I was like, "You're
crazy, Wayne. You're crazy."
There was talk that he may have used racially charged or racist
remarks when he was doing The Apprentice. And I said, "So
Wayne, if it ever came out that Trump used those words or used the
N-word?" And Wayne said, "That would be good for him." He was totally
right. And then nine months later, he's talking about shooting people
on Fifth Avenue. Trump understood that "there's really nothing I can
do [wrong] because these people hate the people I hate, and we're all
gonna be together."
TOM ROBBINS: When I was at the Observer, I had a
column in there called Wise Guys. And at that point, Trump was talking
about running for president. This was 1987, that was thirty years
before he actually ran, almost. He was focused on this from the very
beginning. And none of us took him seriously. . . .
As someone who worked with the tabloid press for a long time, the
people who invented Trump were all those tabloid gossip reporters who
dined out from all of his items over the years and who reported them
right up until the time he ran for president. This is one of the great
unrecognized crimes of the press. We in the tabloid press created
Trump; it wasn't Wayne. Wayne was going after him.
JONATHAN Z. LARSEN: This is the media's Frankenstein's
monster. Trump would call, using a fake name, saying, "I'm the PR guy
for Donald Trump. I really shouldn't be telling you this, but he's
about to get divorced, and he's got three women he's looking
at. There's Marla Maples. There's so-and-so." Very often the people
that he was speaking to recognized his voice. They loved it. It was
free copy.
Barrett really did have some incredibly good information on Trump,
how he built Trump Tower. The head of the concrete union was mobbed
up. There was this crazy woman who bought the apartment just
underneath Donald Trump's because she was sleeping with the concrete
guy, and she wanted to install a pool. It's astonishing, the stuff he
got. It's a national treasure now that we have Wayne Barrett's
reporting. As soon as Trump became president, everybody was picking
through all of Wayne's files.
The ellipsis covers a section on Barrett's Trump book, and stopped
before a section on Barrett's horror watching the 2016 returns. By
then Barrett was terminably ill, and he died just before Trump's
inauguration. I remember reading about Trump in the Voice
back in the 1970s, so I was aware of him as a major scumbag, but I
took no special interest in him otherwise. Anything I did notice
simply added to my initial impression.
Biden and/or the Democrats:
Aaron Blake: [04-05]
Gaza increasingly threatens Democrats' Trump-era unity.
Ben Burgis: [04-04]
Democratic voters are furious about US support of Israel.
Rachel M Cohen: [04-01]
You can't afford to buy a house. Biden knows that.
Page S Gardner/Stanley B Greenberg: [03-15]
They don't want Trump OR Biden. Here's how they still can elect
Biden. "Our new survey of these voters shows the president can
still win their support."
Robert Kuttner: [04-04]
Liberals need to be radicals: "The agenda for Biden's next term
must go deeper to restore the American dream." The substance here is
fine, but why resort to clichés? The "American dream" was never more
than a dream. One can argue that we should dream again, and work to
realize those dreams for everyone. Back in the 1960s, the first real
political book I bought was an anthology called
The New
Radicals, edited by Paul Jacobs and Saul Landau, and I immediately
saw the appeal of the word "radical" for those who seek deep roots of
social problems, but nowadays the word is mostly used as a synonym
for "extremist." But perhaps more importantly, I've cooled on the
desirability for deep solutions (revolutions) and come to appreciate
more superficial reforms. I would refashioned the title to say that
"liberals need to be leftists," because the liberal dream of freedom
can only be universalized through solidarity with others, and is of
little value if limited to self-isolating individuals.
Tim Miller: [04-05]
Joe Biden is not a "genocidal maniac": "And it's not just wrong
but reckless and irresponsible to say he is." I agree with the title,
but I disagree with the subhed. Genocide wasn't his idea, nor is it
something he craves maniacally. But he is complicit in genocide, and
not just passively so. He has said things that have encouraged Israel,
and he has done things that have materially supported genocide. He
has shielded them in the UN, with "allies," and in the media. I've
thought a lot about morality lately, and I've come to think that it
(and therefore immorality) can only be considered among people who
have the freedom to decide on their own what to say and do. Many
people are severely limited in their autonomy, but as president of
the United States, Biden does have a lot of leeway, and should be
judged accordingly.
I realize that one might argue that morality is subordinate to
politics -- that sometimes actual political considerations convince
one to do things that normally regard as immoral (like going to war
against Nazi Germany, or nuking Hiroshima) -- but the fundamentals
remain the same: is the politician free to choose? One might argue
that Biden's initial blind support for Israel was purely reflexive --
lessons he had learned over fifty years in AIPAC-dominated Washington,
a reflex shared by nearly every other politician so conditioned --
but even so, as president Biden had access to information and a lot
of leeway to act, and therefore should be held responsible for his
political, as well as moral, decisions.
Miller goes on to upbraid people for saying "Genocide Joe." He
makes fair points, but hey, given the conditions, that's going to
happen. Most of us have very little power to influence someone like
Biden -- compared to big-time donors, colleagues, and pundits, all
of whom are still pretty limited -- so trying to shame him with a
colorful nickname is one of the few things one can try. In a similar
vein, we used to taunt: "Hey, hey, LBJ; how many kids did you kill
today?" And sure, LBJ was more directly responsible for the slaughter
in Vietnam than Biden is in Gaza, but both earned the blame. Biden,
at least, still has a chance to change course. If he fails, he, and
he alone, sealed his fate.
Elena Schneider/Jeff Coltin: [03-29]
Pro-Palestinian protesters interrupted Biden's glitzy New York
fundraiser: "The event padded Biden's cash advantage, but laid
bare one of his biggest weaknesses." The Biden campaign's response
seems to be to try to exclude potential protesters:
Lisa Lerer/Reid J Epstein/Katie Glueck: [04-07]
How Gaza protesters are challenging Democratic leaders: "From
President Biden to the mayors of small cities, Democrats have been
trailed by demonstrators who are complicating the party's ability
to campaign in an election year." By the way, better term here
than in the Politico piece: you don't have to be "pro-Palestinian"
to be appalled by genocide. You can even be consciously pro-Israel,
someone who cares so much for Israel that your most fervent desire
is to spare them the shame of the path Netanyahu et al. have set
out on.
Washington Monthly: [04-07]
Trump vs. Biden: Who got more done? The print edition has a
series of "accomplishment index" articles comparing the records
of the two presidents. You can probably guess the results, especially
if you don't count corruption and vandalism, the main drivers of the
Trump administration, as accomplishments:
Paul Glastris:
Introduction: Who got more done?.
Bill Scher:
Legislation.
Jacob Heilbrunn:
Foreign policy: This is by far the most problematic area, because
while Trump did real damage -- especially by wrecking openings Obama
(Kerry?) had negotiated to Iran and Cuba -- Biden overshot what were
supposed to be corrections "strengthening the international liberal
order" but turned into provoking a war with Russia over Ukraine and
not deterring Israel's genocide in Gaza.
Caroline Fredrickson:
Courts.
Garphill Julien:
Trade.
Rob Wolfe:
Regulation.
Brigid Schulte:
Work & family.
Will Norris:
Antitrust?
Marc Novicoff:
Immigration?
- Merrill Goozner:
Health care.
- Suzanne Gordon/Steve Early:
Veterans.
Legal matters and other crimes:
Climate and environment:
Economic matters:
Ukraine War:
Around the world:
The bridge:
Beyoncé: Cowboy Carter: I played the album (twice),
and will present my thoughts in the next Music Week. I figured I
was pretty much done with it before I started collecting these,
but thought it might be interesting to note them:
Other stories:
Hannah Goldfield: [04-08]
In the kitchen with the grand dame of Jewish cooking: Gnoshing
with Joan Nathan.
Luke Goldstein: [04-02]
The in-flight magazine for corporate jets: "The Economist has
channeled the concerns of elites for decades. It sees the Biden
administration as a threat."
Stephen Holmes: [04-04]
Radical mismatch: A review of Samuel Moyn: Liberalism Against
Itself: Cold War Intellectuals and the Making of Our Times.
David Cay Johnston: [04-05]
Antitax nation: Review of Michael J Graetz:
The
Power to Destroy: How the Antitax Movement Hijacked America,
explaining "how clever marketing duped America into shoveling more
tax breaks to the wealthy and corporations."
Sarah Jones:
Natalie Korach/Ross A Lincoln: [04-05]
Meta blocks Kansas Reflector and MSNBC columnist over op-ed criticizing
Facebook: "The company says Friday afternoon that the blocks, which
falsely labeled the links as spam, were due to 'a security error.'"
A Wichita columnist also wrote on this:
Orlando Mayorquin/Amanda Holpuch: [04-07]
Southwest plane makes emergency landing after Boeing engine cover
falls off. And just when I thought I'd get through a week with
no Boeing stories. Then I noticed I had two more waiting:
Rick Perlstein: [04-03]
Joe Lieberman not only backed Bush's war; he also helped make Bush
president: "A remembrance of this most feckless of Democrats."
Nathan J Robinson: And other recent pieces from his zine,
Current Affairs:
[03-28]
My date with destiny: "Reviewing major issues in the Israel-Palestine
conflict." Starts with an anecdote about a "massive argument -- with
a popular streamer named Destiny," then gets down to business with
extensively documented sections on the following:
- Starvation in Gaza: Is it happening and who is responsible?
- Is there a genocide?
- Is there apartheid in Palestine?
- Zionism, 1948, and the obstacles to peace
I'm getting to this piece very late in my cycle -- well after
writing my introductory screed and several other lengthy comments --
otherwise I'd feature it up top, at least as one of the best
historical background pieces I've seen recently. Along the way,
he mentions the following:
[2023-10-16]
The current Israel-Palestine crisis was entirely avoidable:
Interview with Jerome Slater, author of
Mythologies
Without End: The US, Israel, and the Arab-Israeli Conflict,
1917-2020, conducted right after the October 7 revolt.
[04-02]
What Trump understand about war: "Donald Trump's militarism is
even worse than Biden's. But he's keeping relatively quiet on
Israel-Palestine, probably because he knows the public doesn't like
war." This is fundamentally right, but I'm finding a lot of details
to quibble with. [Something to do later.] But the point I'd most
want to stress is that while Trump sounds more militarist -- he
gropes the flag, wanted to stage Moscow-style tank-and-missile
parades, wants to be seen as a tough guy -- his political skill
is to identify "messes," blame them on Democrats, and claim that
nothing like that would dare happen under his watch (because, you
know, he's such a tough guy). And wars are always messes, so they're
easy targets for Trump.
[04-08]
Why we need limits on extreme wealth: Interview with Ingrid
Robeyns, author of
Limitarianism: The Case Against Extreme Wealth.
[2023-06-14]
We must banish 'bootstraps' mythology from American life:
Interview with Alissa Quart, around the time her book
Bootstrapped: Liberating Ourselves From the American Dream
came out in hardcover, but note that it's coming out in paperback
on April 9.
Rob Larson: [01-30]
Let's test the 'intelligence' of tech billionaires.
Alberto C Medina: [04-05]
The case for Puerto Rican independence.
Lily Sanchez: [03-20]
Against incrementalism.
Alex Skopic: [03-25]
Ye and the problem of fascist art: "The rapper's embrace of
Nazi ideology is strange and awful, but it can teach us a lot
about how far-right politics spread."
K Wilson: [04-05]
Why the right constantly panics over societal 'decadence':
From Oswald Spengler's The Decline of the West through a
number of recent references, including Nick Fuentes and Jordan
Peterson (and Alexander Dugin, who fears a similar decline, but
in his case, caused by the West).
Jeffrey St Clair: [04-04]
The day John Sinclair died: "The poet, musician, writer, pot
liberator, raconteur, Tigers fan, jazzbo, political radical,
producer of MC5, founder of the White Panthers and occasional
CounterPunch, John Sinclair died this week at 82."
Michael Stavola: [04-03]
Wichitan involved in deadly swatting arrested after reportedly doing
donuts in Old Town: This story, where Wichita Police murdered
Andrew Finch, keeps getting sicker. The trigger man not only got off,
he's since been promoted, even after the city agreed to pay $5 million
to the victim's family, while they managed to pin blame on three other
pranksters. There's plenty of blame to go around. Not even mentioned
here is the gun lobby and their Republican stooges who did so much to
create an atmosphere where dozens of trigger-happy cops are dispatched
to deal with an anonymous complaint, totally convinced that everyone
they encounter is at likely to be armed and shoot as they are.
Carl Wilson: [03-25]
Sweeping up kernels from Pop Con 2024. Includes links to key
presentations by
Robert Christgau,
Michaelangelo Matos,
Glenn McDonald,
De Angela L Duff,
Alfred Soto, and
Ned Raggett.
I scribbled this down from a Nathan J Robinson
tweet: "very interesting discussion of how, during World War I,
attrocities attributed to German soldiers were used to whip people
into a frenzy and create an image of a monstrous, inhuman enemy --
atrocities that later turned out to be dubious/exaggerated, well
after the fighting stopped." That was followed by a scan from an
unidentified book:
. . . stated that the Germans had systematically murdered, outraged,
and violated innocent men, women, and children in Belgium. "Murder,
lust, and pillage," the report said, "prevailed over many parts of
Belgium on a scale unparalleled in any war between civilised nations
during the last three centuries." The report gave titillating details
of how German officers and men had publicly raped twenty Belgian girls
in the market place at Liège, how eight German soldiers had bayoneted
a two-year-old child, and how another had sliced off a peasant girl's
breasts in Malilnes. Bryce's signature added considerable weight to
the report, and it was not until after the war that several
unsatisfactory aspects of the Bryce committee's activities
emerged. The committee had not personally interviewed a single
witness. The report was based on 1,200 depositions, mostly from
Belgian refugees, taken by twenty-two barristers in Britain. None of
the witnesses were placed on oath, their names were omitted (to
prevent reprisals against their relatives), and hearsay evidence was
accepted at full value. Most disturbing of all was the fact that,
although the depositions should have been filed at the Home Office,
they had mysteriously disappeared, and no trace of them has been found
to this day. Finally, a Belgian commission of enquiry in 1922, when
passions had cooled, failed markedly to corroborate a single major
allegation in the Bryce report. By then, of course, the report had
served its purpose. Its success in arousing hatred and condemnation of
Germany makes it one of the most successful propaganda pieces of the
war.
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Tuesday, April 2, 2024
Music Week
April archive
(in progress).
Music: Current count 42079 [42039] rated (+40), 39 [31] unrated (+8).
Speaking
of Which published late Sunday night, with a few additions today.
Lots of serious stuff there -- a claim I hardly feel like making for
this post. However, I resolved quite some time ago to take notes on
what I managed to listen to, and to share them for whoever cares.
I didn't realize until mid-week that last
Music Week
was the last of the month. I've updated the
March Streamnotes file
accordingly. When I went to index it, I found I hadn't goten to
February either.
Nasty, tedious job, but done now. It did solve one nagging issue
of an album I thought I had reviewed but didn't record in the
database.
I week-plus ago, I
tweeted advance notice of an A-list album (Roby Glod's No
ToXiC), figuring I might make a practice of doing that, at
least for cases where the whole album can be sampled on Bandcamp.
But I couldn't do much like that this week, aside from my preferred
slice of the Pauline Anna Strom box,
Plot Zero. I should recheck to be sure, but when I went to
look, several of this week's picks aren't on Bandcamp, and most that
are only have partial tracks available (in some cases, noted in the
reviews, that haven't been released yet).
This post was ready to go Monday evening, but I wanted to go back
and touch up Speaking of Which before posting them both. I didn't get
that done, and was too exhausted by bed time. I never got started on
Tuesday, either, so everything has to go up pretty much as it was.
Unlikely I will get much of anything done later in the week, either,
so next week's posts will be minimal, if they happen at all.
New records reviewed this week:
1010benja: Ten Total (2024, Three Six Zero):
Rapper-singer Benjamin Lyman, based in Kansas City, first album
after an EP, finds a groove and sensibility as original as the
early mixtapes of Weeknd and Frank Ocean.
A- [sp]
Miguel Atwood-Ferguson: Les Jardins Mystiques Vol. 1
(2023, Brainfeeder, 3CD): Los Angeles-based composer, violinist,
has several previous albums (back to 2007), this one a monster
(even without the promised future volume[s]), running 3.5 hours
(also available on 4-LP), no recording dates given but "14 years
in the making . . . with contributions from 50+ friends,"
including a fair number I recognize. Too big and possibly too
luxe for me, but makes for consistently engaging background.
The few critics who mention it at all rate it very highly.
B+(***) [sp]
Jim Baker/Steve Hunt/Jakob Heinemann: Horizon Scanners
(2022 [2024], Clean Feed): Pianist, one of few operating in Chicago's
vibrant avant-jazz scene, couple dozen albums since his 1997 debut,
more side-credits, trio here with drums and bass, Baker also playing
ARP-2600.
B+(**) [sp]
Peter Brötzmann/Paal Nilssen-Love: Chicken Shit Bingo
(2015 [2024], Trost): Posthumous archive dig but not too deep,
a set from Zuiderpershuis in Antwerp, with Brötzmann opting for
relatively soft horns (tarogato, bb clarinet, contra-alto clarinet),
Nilssen-Love with a lot of experience in sax/drums duos.
B+(*) [bc]
Christie Dashiell: Journey in Black (2023, self-released):
Jazz singer-songwriter, first album, seven originals, two covers,
with Marquis Hill (trumpet), Allyn Johnson (keyboards), Shedrick
Mitchell (organ), Romeir Mendez (bass), and Carroll Vaughn Dashiel
III (drums).
B+(**) [sp]
Empress Of: For Your Consideration (2024, Major
Arcana/Giant Music): Pop singer-songwriter Lorely Rodriguez, from
Los Angeles, parents from Honduras, Berklee grad, fourth album
since 2015.
B+(**) [sp]
Julieta Eugenio: Stay (2023 [2024], Cristalyn):
Tenor saxophonist, from Italy, based in New York, 2022 debut album
was one of the year's best. Mostly trio with Matt Dwonszyk (bass)
and Jonathan Barber (drums), adding Leo Genovese (Fender Rhodes)
on two tracks. Doesn't try to blow you away here, but is steady,
assured, and consistently engaging -- not a formula yet, not so
easy to normalize.
A- [cd]
Four Tet: Three (2024, Text): Longtime alias for
English DJ Kieran Hebden, a dozen-plus albums since 1999, plus a
few jazzier items under his own name (with the late drummer, Steve
Reid). Beats up front, then relaxes a bit. As nice as anything
he's done in at least a decade.
B+(***) [sp]
Kim Gordon: The Collective (2024, Matador):
Sonic Youth's better half, second post-divorce solo album. With
beats supposed to be derived from trap (albeit plated with a
surface of industrial klang), frayed vocals that could be called
rap (but are probably too cryptic). Sonically, it's as distinct
as anything her former group rolled out, perhaps more so. Youth?
Not really. I have some doubts, but it does quite an impression.
A- [sp]
Guillermo Gregorio: Two Trios (2018-20 [2023],
ESP-Disk): Clarinet player from Argentina, where he first recorded
in 1963, moved to Vienna, then to Chicago, where he resumed in the
1990s, and finally to New York. First trio here was recorded at
Edgefest in Ann Arbor, with Carrie Biolo (vibes) and Fred Lonberg-Holm
(cello). Second was at Downtown Music Gallery in New York, with Iván
Barenboim (contralto clarinet) and Nicholas Jozwiak (cello).
B+(***) [cd]
Guillermo Gregorio/Damon Smith/Jerome Bryerton: The Cold
Arrow (2022 [2023], Balance Point Acoustics): Clarinets,
bass, and percussion ("Paiste Bronze Series gongs & selected
metal & cymbals, no drums used").
B+(**) [sp]
Mercer Hassy Orchestra: Duke's Place (2022-23 [2024],
Mercer Hassy): Japanese big band, leader "was born as Masahide Hashimoto
in Sapporo, Japan," home base for this exceptionally racous and rather
raunchy Ellington tribute band. He is credited as arranger, also for
drum programming and guitar. Several vocals, lots of excitement. Group
has two previous albums, one in this vein (Sir Duke), the other
more varied (Don't Stop the Carnival). Hassy has a non-Orchestra
album with strings and traditional Japanese instruments, but also Alan
Pasqua and Peter Erskine. This one slops off here and there, but is
too much fun not so share.
A- [cd] [04-15)
Jlin: Akoma (2024, Planet Mu): Electronica producer
Jerrilynn Patton, from Gary, Indiana, fourth (or third) album. Beats,
which is all that matters.
B+(***) [sp]
Julien Knowles: As Many, as One (2023 [2024],
Biophilia): Trumpet player, based in Los Angeles, first album,
a postbop quintet -- alto sax, piano, bass, drums, no one I
recognize, plus strings on three tracks -- as ambitious as
claimed but returns are marginal for 70:27.
B+(*) [cd] [04-26]
Anysia Kym: Truest (2024, 10k, EP): Brooklyn-based
"producer," third album, sings along with her hip-hop beats and
shadings, some guest rap (MIKE), not much press. Nine songs, 22:48.
B+(*) [sp]
Ellie Lee: Escape (2024, self-released): Korean
pianist, original first name Seunghyung, studied at Berklee and in
New Jersey, counts Joanne Brackeen and Bill Charlap among her tutors,
first album, originals (one an arrangement of Benny Golson), shows
remarkable poise, helped considerably by saxophonist Steven Wilson.
With Steve LaSpina (bass) and Jongkuk Kim (drums).
B+(***) [05-24]
Adrianne Lenker: Bright Future (2024, 4AD):
Singer-songwriter, best known as leader of Big Thief, has several
solo albums, two before Big Thief, three since. Very basic, guitar
and voice, harmonies adding resonance, the songs standing on their
own, and faring well.
B+(***) [sp]
Kali Malone: All Life Long (2024, Ideologic Organ):
American composer, from Denver, based in Stockholm, sixth album since
2017, started with electronics plays pipe organ here, with a choir
(Macadem Ensemble) and brass quintet (Anima Brass). Very solemn.
B+(*) [sp]
The Messthetics/James Brandon Lewis: The Messthetics and
James Brandon Lewis (2024, Impulse!): Bassist (Joe Lally)
and drummer (Brandan Canty) from Fugazi, plus jazz guitarist Anthony
Pirog, formed this post-rock power trio for two 2018-19 albums,
return here with the reigning heavyweight tenor sax champ riffing
over heavier-than-usual beats. He's supreme, as usual, but Pirog
doesn't really rise to the occasion -- unlike, the Ex guitarists
in Lean Left, to pick a somewhat comparable example.
B+(***) [sp]
Travis Reuter: Quintet Music (2022 [2024],
self-released): Guitarist, born in Seattle, has a previous album
from 2012, a variety of side credits since, lists his quintet on
the cover as you should recognize the names: Mark Shim (tenor sax),
Peter Schlamb (vibraphone), Harish Raghavan (bass), Tyshawn Sorey
(drums). Slippery, often fractured, rhythm is interesting.
B+(***) [cd] [04-19]
Schoolboy Q: Blue Lips (2024, Interscope): Los Angeles
rapper Matthew Hanley, sixth album since 2011, this after a five-year
break. Sharp beats, ends on a catchy note, but I didn't get much more.
B+(*) [sp]
Altin Sencalar: Discover the Present (2024,
Posi-Tone): Trombonist, first album, nonet has most of the label's
regulars on board, including Diego Rivera, Michael Dease, Art
Hirahara, and Rudy Royston.
B+(*) [sp]
Matthew Shipp Trio: New Concepts in Piano Trio Jazz
(2023 [2024], ESP-Disk): Pianist, has been major since c. 1990,
both on his own records and accompanying saxophonists, notably
David S. Ware and Ivo Perelman. Went through an avant-jazztronica
that I was so taken by I wound up writing a
consumer guide to
his work (plus a lot more by William Parker) and a Rolling Stone
guide entry. Since
then, he's refocused on trio and solo albums, exhaustively it can
seem. This is his sixth trio album with Michael Bisio (bass) and
Newman Taylor Baker (drums), following many more with various others
(starting with Parker and Whit Dickey, then Bisio and Dickey). I've
heard pretty much all of them, and still I have no idea what the
"new concepts" are here. This is, however, a superb sample of what
he's been doing for many years now.
A- [cd] [04-05]
Jacob Shulman: High Firmament (2024, Endectomorph
Music): Tenor saxophonist, also plays clarinets, based in Los Angeles,
has a previous album from 2021, and an earlier opera (Role Playing
Game), which at least exists on Bandcamp. Also a second new album,
Ferment Below, which showed up with this one, an advance looking
like a double album, but they are treated as separate digitally, and
I don't see any evidence of them existing otherwise. Both albums have
piano (Hayoung Lyou), bass (Walter Stinson), and drums (Kayvon Gordon).
Fancy postbop, more interesting to read about ("thousands of years of
conjecture and agony have led us to conclude that our world diverges
from Euclidean geometry in unresolvable ways" -- you can't just observe
that?) -- than to listen to.
B [cdr]
Jacob Shulman: Ferment Below (2024, Endectomorph
Music): Annoyed me even more than the first one, until it inexplicably
got better. Maybe I relaxed once I ditched the Pythagoras and realized
that the review, like the record, would eventually end. But then it
turned back into opera.
B [cdr]
Ronny Smith: Struttin' (2024, Pacific Coast Jazz):
Guitarist, "melodic and soulful," writes funky originals, covers
Wes Montgomery, also credited "keys, bass, programming," second
song adds vocals to sound like a Chic outtake (but just that one),
elsewhere there's a nice bit of sax.
B+(*) [cd] [04-19]
Mary Timony: Untame the Tiger (2024, Merge):
Singer-songwriter from DC, been through several indie bands
(Helium, Wild Flag, Ex Hex, Hammered Hulls) as well as several
solo albums (one called Ex Hex before the group).
B [sp]
Erik Truffaz: Clap! (2023, Blue Note): Trumpet
player, born in Switzerland, close to twenty albums since 1997.
B+(*) [sp]
Julia Vari Feat. Negroni's Trio: Somos (2024,
Alternative Representa): Mexican-American standards singer,
couple previous albums (but none on Discogs), backed by Puerto
Rican pianist José Negroni,
who has at least four Trio albums with Josh Allen (bass) and
Nomar Negroni (drums, José's son). Seven songs, 35:19, the
sort of singer and trio I rarely give a second thought to, but
everything here delights me -- the torchy opener in Spanish,
seguing into "Nature Boy," "Song for My Father" with lyrics
in Portuguese, and especially the bits of French in "C'est
si bon," a language I know just well enough to feel the
phrase without having to translate it.
A- [cd]
Fay Victor: Herbie Nichols SUNG: Life Is Funny That Way
(2023 [2024], Tao Forms, 2CD): Jazz singer, born in Brooklyn but moved
around a lot, with Trinidad and Zambia figuring in her childhood, Long
Island for her teens, with Japan and Amsterdam major pivots in her
career. She's probably sick of the Betty Carter comparisons, but after
this album it's Carter who should be honored. I've been a huge fan of
Nichols since I first heard his Blue Note trios in a 1975 2-LP (The
Third World, but still have no idea how she managed to arrange
those compositions into these pieces (adding her lyrics, or often
just scat), except to note that Nichols' legacy has long inspired
other geniuses (Misha Mengelberg, Steve Lacy, and Roswell Rudd leap
to mind). (By the way, I'm only now noticing that the original LPs
were in two volumes as The Prophetic Herbie Nichols, following
on The Amazing Bud Powell, The Eminent Jay Jay Johnson,
etc.; for CDs, look for The Complete Blue Note Recordings,
originally on Mosaic but reissued by Blue Note in 1997, and also look
out for his Bethlehem album, Love, Gloom, Cash, Love. A good
place to start for Nicols projects in Regeneration (1983),
with all three names I dropped above, but they've each done more,
as have many others.) Group here is superb, with Michaël Attias
(alto/baritone sax), Anthony Coleman (piano), Ratzo Harris (bass),
and Tom Rainey (drums). (Like Carter, she really knows how to work
a band.)
A [cd] [04-05]
Waxahatchee: Tigers Blood (2024, Anti-):
Singer-songwriter Katie Crutchfield, out of Alabama (Bandcamp
puts her in Kansas City), formerly of P.S. Eliot, also of Plains,
sixth Waxahatchee album since 2012, currently 4 on AOTY's "highest
rated albums of 2024" (86/26, more reviews than anyone above; fewer
than two other top-ten albums I don't particularly like). If I'm
being evasive here, it's probably because while the songs sound
good enough, I'm not connecting with them. Pehaps one to revisit
later?
B+(***) [sp]
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries:
Sven-Åke Johansson und Alexander von Schlippenbach: Über
Ursache und Wirkung der Meinungsverschiedenheiten Beim Turmbau zu
Babel (1994 [2024], Trost): Swedish free jazz drummer, has
played in duos with the German pianist at least since 1976, their
relationship going back further in Globe Unity Orchestra. This
was billed as a "Musikdrama in einem Akt," with Shelley Hirsch
joining Johansson (who plays accordion) for vocals, and a small
group that includes piano, drums (Paul Lovens), reeds (Dietmar
Diesner and Wolfgang Fuchs), and cello (Tristan Honsinger). I
can't speak to the libretto, but the music is a riot.
B+(**) [bc]
Microstoria: Init Ding + _Snd (1995-96 [2024],
Thrill Jockey, 2CD): Electronica duo of Markus Popp (Oval) and
Jan St. Werner (Mouse on Mars), recorded six albums 1995-2002,
the first two reissued here. Not exactly ambient, but not much
to distinguish itself either.
B+(*) [sp]
Old music:
Guillermo Gregorio: Faktura (1999-2000 [2002],
Hat Now): Clarinet player from Argentina, then based in Chicago,
fairly minimal pieces, some trio with Carrie Biolo (vibes/marimba)
and Fred Lonberg-Holm (cello), other guest spots including Jim
Baker (piano), Jeff Parker (guitar), Kyle Bruckmann (oboe), Jeb
Bishop (trombone), and François Houle (clarinet), with two
"concrete sound" interludes crediting engineer Lou Mallozzi.
B+(**) [sp]
Pauline Anna Strom: Trans-Millenia Consort (1982,
Ether Ship): Electronic music composer (1946-2020), synthesizers
and taped sounds, first album (of seven through 1988, was a "Reiki
master, spiritual counselor, and healer," so her music was part
and parcel of all that. This and two more albums were boxed up
for 2023's Echoes, Spaces, Lines, which is on Bandcamp but
Spotify only has the albums broken out, so we'll take them
one-by-one. Constructs a universe of peace and beauty, with few
distractions.
B+(***) [sp]
Pauline Anna Strom: Plot Zero (1982-83 [1983],
Trans-Millenia Consort): Further developing her sense of keyboard
rhythm, also spacey flights, with one unseemly crescendo detracting
from the soothing bliss.
A- [sp]
Pauline Anna Strom: Spectre (1982-83 [1984],
Trans-Millenia Consort): More of the same, seeming a bit less
wondrous, as tends to happen.
B+(**) [sp]
Pauline Anna Strom: Echoes, Spaces, Lines (1982-83
[2023], RVNG Intl, 4CD): This compiles her first three albums --
see above: Trans-Millenia Consort, Plot Zero, and
Spectre -- and adds two cuts (6:30) at the end, the extra
CD probably due to the reshuffling to also box the same music on
4-LP. I gave the second album a slight edge over the others, but
it's possible that the variations add up to something more than
the parts. (Also that the packaging helps, although I haven't
seen it. Note that the individual album remasters are available
separately, at least on Bandcamp.)
B+(***) [sp/bc]
Julia Vari: Adoro (2015, Alternativa Representa):
Mexican-American, not much on her but reportedly sings in eight
languages and plays piano, even less on this album -- just the
release date, a note that it's her second, and that there is a
4-song EP of the same name, but this has 10 songs, 45:09. Mostly
Spanish (presumably, at least nothing I recognize), some excellent
piano, a bit of nice sax.
B+(**) [sp]
Julia Vari: Lumea: Canciones del Mundo en Jazz
(2013, Alternativa Representa): This does seem to be her first
album. Credits would be helpful, but I can't find any -- other
than to note one standard in English, and at least one Jobim,
but most must be in Spanish. More notes: "multilingual
singer-songwriter and pianist"; "both albums soared to the top
of the jazz-blues charts in Latin America"; "divides her time
between Miami and Mexico City"; "BMI songwriter"; "performs
as a Headliner on luxury cruise lines."
B+(*) [sp]
Julia Vari: Bygone Nights (2018, Alternativa
Representa, EP): Four songs, 12:37, title song an original in
English, followed by two songs in Spanish I can trace back to
others ("Achupé," "Te Veo"), and a Latin twist on old Yiddish,
"Bei Mir Bist Du Schoen."
B+(*) [sp]
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Chet Baker & Jack Sheldon: In Perfect Harmony: The Lost Album (1972, Jazz Detective) [04-20]
- John Basile: Heatin' Up (StringTime Jazz) [04-01]
- Nicola Caminiti: Vivid Tales of a Blurry Self-Portrait (self-released) [05-10]
- The Core: Roots (Moserobie) [04-12]
- Arnaud Dolmen/Leonardo Montana; LéNo (Quai Son) [03-29]
- Dave Douglas: Gifts (Greenleaf Music) [04-12]
- Yelena Eckemoff: Romance of the Moon (L&H Production) [05-10]
- Eric Frazier: That Place (EFP Productions) [03-29]
- Jazz at the Ballroom: Flying High: Big Band Canaries Who Soared (Jazz at the Ballroom) [05-03]
- Maria João & Carlos Bica Quartet: Close to You (JACC)
- Yusef Lateef: Atlantis Lullaby: The Concert From Avignon (1972, Elemental Music, 2CD) [04-26]
- Shawn Maxwell: J Town Suite (Cora Street) [05-01]
- Modney: Ascending Primes (Pyroclastic) [05-18]
- Mike Monford: The Cloth I'm Cut From (self-released) [05-04]
- Mute: After You've Gone (Endectomorph Music) * [05-13]
- The Michael O'Neill Sextet: Synergy: With Tony Lindsay (Jazzmo) [04-19]
- Sun Ra: At the Showcase: Live in Chicago 1976-1977 (Jazz Detective, 2CD) [04-20]
- Art Tatum: Jewels in the Treasure Box: The 1953 Chicago Blue Note Jazz Club Recordings (Resonance, 3CD) [04-20]
- Mal Waldron/Steve Lacy: The Mighty Warriors (1995, Elemental Music, 2CD): [04-20]
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Sunday, March 31, 2024
Speaking of Which
This is another week where I ran out of time before I ran out of
things I needed to look up. Further updates are possible, although
as I'm writing this, I'm pretty exhausted, so I'm tempted to call
it done.
First thing to add on Monday is: Jonathan Swan: [04-01]
Trump's call for Israel to 'finish up' war alarms some on the right:
Assuming this isn't an April Fool, as Israeli journalist Ariel Kahana
puts it, "Trump effectively bypassed Biden from the left, when he
expressed willingness to stop this war and get back to being the
great country you once were." As Trump put it, "You have to finish
up your war. You have to get it done. We have to get to peace. We
can't have this going on." Kahana continued:
"There's no way to beautify, minimize or cover up that problematic
message."
Trump aides insisted this was a misinterpretation. A campaign
spokeswoman, Karoline Leavitt, said that Mr. Trump "fully supports
Israel's right to defend itself and eliminate the terrorist threat,"
but that Israel's interests would be "best served by completing this
mission as quickly, decisively and humanely as possible so that the
region can return to peace and stability."
Trump wants it both ways: he wants to be seen as tough as possible --
there is no indication that "finish it" couldn't include simply killing
everyone, but he recognizes that free time to do whatever Israel wants
is in limited supply. So is American patience, because it is finally
sinking in that this genocide is bad for America's relationships with
the world, not just for Israel.
The article includes a good deal about and from David M. Friedman,
who was Trump's ambassador to Israel, but could just as well be viewed
as Netanyahu's mole in the Trump administration.
Mr. Friedman has gone much further than Mr. Kushner, who seemed to
be only musing. Mr. Friedman has
developed a proposal for Israel to claim full sovereignty over
the West Bank -- definitively ending the possibility of a two-state
solution. West Bank Palestinians who have been living under Israeli
military occupation since 1967 would not be given Israeli citizenship
under the plan, Mr. Friedman confirmed in the interview.
Of course, Trump wouldn't put it that way -- he'd never admit to
going to the left of any "radical left Democrat," although he has
occasionally scored points by avoiding extreme right Republican
positions (like demolishing Social Security and Medicare). But
peace isn't a position exclusive to the left. The trick for Trump,
following Nixon in 1968, is to convince people that the tough guy
is the best option for "peace with honor." It's hard to see how
Trump can sustain that illusion, especially given that he has zero
comprehension of the problem, and nothing but counterproductive
reflexes. (Nixon didn't deliver either.)
Nathan Robinson
tweeted on this piece, adding:
I have this wild notion that Trump might conceivably run to Biden's
left on Israel-Palestine in the general election, like he did with
Hillary and Iraq.
Elsewhere, Robinson
noted:
Trump has always understood that the American people
don't care for war. That was crucial to his successful campaign against
Hillary in 2016. He's been unusually quiet for a Republican on
Israel-Palestine, probably in the hopes it will be a big disaster
for Biden.
I figured I'd add more to this post, but got bogged down with
Music Week,
then other things, so this will have to do. I doubt I'll get much
done over the next two or three weeks, as we have various company
coming and going. Not that there won't be lots to write about, as
Tuesday's Mondoweiss daily title makes clear: [04-02]
Israel kills 7 international aid workers in central Gaza, passes
law banning Al Jazeera.
Initial count is actually pretty substantial:
183 links, 9,891 words.
Updated count [04-02]: 196 links, 11,509 words.
Top story threads:
Israel:
Mondoweiss:
[03-25]
Day 171: 'Horrific' eyewitness accounts continue to emerge from
Israel's siege on Gaza's hospitals: "Eyewitness accounts
continue to emerge from Gaza's hospitals, including rape, torture,
mass executions, and soldiers crushing Palestinian bodies with
tanks. Hamas says Israel's systematic attack on hospitals is
central to its 'war of extermination.'"
[03-26]
Day 172: Israel continues raids on Gaza hospitals following UNSC
ceasefire resolution: "The UN Security Council finally passed a
resolution calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, with the U.S.
abstaining from a vote. Netanyahu, however, has vowed to continue
the war, with Israeli forces currently attacking two major hospitals
in Gaza."
[03-27]
Day 173: Israel continues attacking Gaza's hospitals, kills 7 people
in Lebanon: "Following the UN Security Council ceasefire resolution,
Israel continued its attacks on Gaza hospitals, killing 76 Palestinians
across the Gaza Strip. Meanwhile, in southern Lebanon, Israel killed 7
Lebanese people during cross-border fighting."
[03-28]
Day 174: Israel announces it has killed 200 Palestinians in its siege
of al-Shifa Hospital: "The Israeli army announced it has killed
200 Palestinians in al-Shifa Hospital and its vicinity since its second
raid on the hospital started 11 days ago. Meanwhile, Israeli media says
the military is preparing for the invasion of Rafah."
[03-29]
Day 175: ICJ orders Israel to stop famine in Gaza as Israel continues
to raid hospitals: "The International Court of Justice imposed
new provisional measures in South Africa's case against Israel for
its genocide in Gaza, ordering Israel to ensure the entry of food
and other supplies in order to stop the spreading famine."
[04-01]
Day 178: Israel withdraws from al-Shifa Hospital, leaving evidence
of a massacre in its wake: "Dozens of bodies are still being
recovered from the rubble of a destroyed and burnt al-Shifa Hospital,
following a two-week Israeli raid and siege on the hospital." After
missing over the weekend, this invaluable series returns.
- AlJazeera: For quite some time I've been leading off
with the daily logs published by Mondoweiss, but they didn't appear
on Saturday and Sunday, so let these fill in. You can search for
other possible daily updates, which
Google suggests includes: Palestine Chronicle, Haaretz, IMEMC,
Al Mayadeen, Palestine Chronicle, Times of Israel, Roya News, TASS,
Jerusalem Post, Al-Manar TV Lebanon, UNRWA. Other news organizations
that provide
live updates include: AlJazeera, CNN, Guardian, Washington Post,
New York Times, ABC, I24News, CNBC,
Middle East Monitor.
[03-30]
Day 176: List of key events: "Israeli attacks kill dozens of
Palestinians including 15 people at a sport centre where war-displaced
people were sheltering."
[03-31]
Day 177: List of key events: "Gaza's Media Office says Israel
has committed 'a new massacre' by bombing inside the walls of a
hospital in Deir el-Balah."
Kaamil Ahmed/Damien Gayle/Aseel Mousa: [03-29]
'Ecocide in Gaza': does scale of environmental destruction amount
to a war crime?: "Satellite analysis revealed to the Guardian
shows farms devastated and nearly half of the territory's trees
razed. Alongside mounting air and water pollution, experts say
Israel's onslaught on Gaza's ecosystems has made the area unlivable."
Let's say this loud: This is one of the most significant pieces
of reporting yet on the war. War crime? Sure, but specifically
this is compelling proof of intent, as well as fact, of genocide.
The purpose of ecocide is to kill, perhaps less directly than bombs
but more systematically, more completely. And driving people away?
Sure, Israel will settle for that, especially as they're making it
impossible for people who flee to return.
Before this war, I must admit that I pictured Gaza as this chunk
of desert totally covered by urban sprawl: you know, Manhattan's
population in an area only slightly larger. Ever since the Nakba
swept a couple hundred thousand Palestinians into refugee camps
there, Gaza has had to import food. But any food they struggled to
produce locally helped, especially as the population grew, and as
Israel, as they liked to boast, "put Gaza on a diet." So small
farms helped, and greenhouses even more. Israel has gone way out
of their way to destroy food sources, much as they've destroyed
utilities, hospitals, housing. While the news focuses on the top
line deaths figure -- well over 30,000 but still, I'm sure, quite
seriously undercounted -- Israel has shifted focus to long-term
devastation.
Ammiel Alcalay: [03-26]
Israel's lethal charade hides its real goals in plain sight:
"Forget Israel's stated goals about destroying Hamas. Its real,
undeclared goal has always been to make Gaza uninhabitable and
destroy as many traces of Palestinian life as possible."
Nada Almadhoun: [03-26]
A volunteer doctor in Gaza faces her patients' traumas along with her
own: "I am in my final year in medical school and have seen hundreds
of critical cases as a volunteer doctor during Israel's genocidal assault
on Gaza. The traumas I have seen in my patients are no different from
those I have experienced myself."
Zack Beauchamp: [03-29]
The crisis that could bring down Benjamin Netantyahu, explained:
"Netanyahu has till Sunday evening to present a fix to Israel's
controversial conscription law. If he fails, his government likely
fails with him." Genocide isn't controversial, but this [drafting
yeshiva students] is? Actually, special status for ultra-orthodox
Jews has been a fault line in Israeli politics ever since 1948 --
arguably Ben-Gurion's biggest mistake was bringing them into his
government. But the stakes over conscription has grown over time,
and are especially acute in times of high mobilization, like now.
Sheera Frenkel: [03-27]
Israel deploys expansive facial recognition program in Gaza.
They've been doing this in the West Bank for some time. Israel is
also developing an export business for surveillance technology,
handy for authoritarian regimes everywhere. Some earlier reports
on this:
Tareq S Hajjaj: [03-25]
The story of Yazan Kafarneh, the boy who starved to death in Gaza.
Ghada Hania: [03-30]
'No, dear. I will never leave Gaza.'
Ellen Ioanes/Nicole Narea: [03-25]
Gaza's risk of famine is accelerating faster than anything we've seen
in this century: "Everyone in Gaza is facing crisis levels of
hunger. It's entirely preventable." In case you're wondering where
he ever got such idea, Israel negotiated the exile of PLO members
from Beirut, putting them on ships, most heading to Tunisia. Before
that, British ships transferred large number of Palestinians from
Jaffa to Beirut. So that's one thing the pier could be used for --
if the US can line up anywhere to deposit the refugees.
Chris Hedges: [03-18]
Israel's Trojan Horse: "The 'temporary pier' being built on the
Mediterranean coast of Gaza is not there to alleviate the famine,
but to herd Palestinians onto ships and into permanent exile."
Ameer Makhoul: [03-25]
While eyes are on Rafah, Israel is cementing control of northern
Gaza: "Israel is building infrastructure to carve up Gaza,
prevent the return of displaced Palestinians, and change the
geographical and demographic facts on the ground."
Orly Noy: [03-23]
Hebrew University's faculty of repressive science: "The suspension
of Palestinian professor Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian empties all meaning
from the university's proclaimed values of pluralism and equality."
Jonathan Ofir: [03-26]
Another Israeli soldier admits to implementing the 'Hannibal Directive'
on October 7: "Captain Bar Zonshein recounts firing tank shells
on vehicles carrying Israeli civilians on October 7. 'I decide that
this is the right decision, that it's better to stop the abduction
and that they not be taken,' he told Israeli media outlets."
Meron Rapoport: [03-29]
Why do Israelis feel so threatened by a ceasefire? "Halting the
Gaza war means recognizing that Israel's military goals were
unrealistic -- and that it cannot escape a political process with
the Palestinians."
Israel vs. world opinion:
Gilbert Achcar: [03-30]
The US administration's hypocrisy and Israel's cockiness.
Michael Arria: [03-28]
The Shift: 'What the hell is the point of the UN or the UN Security
Council?': "On Monday the UN Security Council passed a resolution
calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza. The U.S. didn't veto it
but don't count on policy changes."
Perry Bacon Jr: [03-26]
These progressives were right about Gaza. Now it could cost them their
seats. That's because AIPAC is pouring millions of dollars into
primaries against them. The ploy has worked often enough that most
Democrats are wary of ever crossing Israel, even though most voters
have long supported a ceasefire.
James Carden/Kelley Beaucar Vlahos: [03-28]
Is it a mystery? Where Trump stands on Israel-Gaza war: "His
past record and 'finish it up' comments today suggest a hard line,
though he leaves just a sliver of ambiguity."
Aida Chavez: [03-27]
Don't believe the hype -- Biden's Israel policy hasn't changed.
Juan Cole:
Julia Conley: [03-27]
State Dept. official quits in protest of Biden's Gaza policy:
"Trying to advocate for human rights just became impossible,"
Annelle Sheline says. More:
Sarah Dadouch: [03-28]
Jordan's government struggles to contain unrest as Gaza protests
grow.
Matt Duss: [03-27]
The obstacle Chuck Schumer left out of his big Israel speech:
AIPAC.
Richard Falk: [02-25]
In Gaza, the west is enabling the most transparent genocide in human
history: Most historical genocides have been well hidden from
public scrutiny, leaving one to wonder whether timely exposure might
have changed their course. While Israel has done much to cloud Gaza
from clear view, ranging from killing journalists and shutting down
Internet in Gaza to flooding the West with propaganda ranging from
ordinary spin to outrageous lies, the broad shape of Israel's attack
and the genocidal intent of its leaders has been clearly reported
(at least for anyone who cared to look). Nonetheless: "Liberal
democracies failed not only by their refusal to make active efforts
to prevent genocide, but more brazenly by openly facilitating
continuation of the genocidal onslaught."
John Hudson: [03-29]
US signs off on more bombs, warplanes for Israel: "Despite a widening
rift with the Israeli government, the Biden administration continues to
authorize the transfer of 2,000-pound bombs and other weapons." So,
"Genocide Joe" it still is.
Caitlin Johnstone: [03-29]
Israel supporters true colors: Discredit, censor, control the
narrative: "That's why Israel supporters push so hard to
de-platform and censor and to get TikTok shut down: all they care
about is controlling the public narrative."
Tariq Kenney-Shawa: [03-14]
Israeli Partisans' use of disinformation.
Branko Marcetic: [03-29]
Biden is undermining the UN to protect Israel's war.
Qassam Muaddi: [03-29]
Security Council ceasefire resolution brings 'little hope' to Gaza as
Israeli genocide rages on.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: [03-25]
The US must stop facilitating mass killing in Gaza.
John Peeler: [03-29]
Gaza: A century's tragedy plays out: "Biden has thus far not chosen
to use the leverage he has as Israel's principal source of arms and
finance. So Netanyahu continues to ignore the US misgivings."
Bryan Pietsch: [03-27]
Most Americans oppose Israel's war in Gaza, poll finds.
Mitchell Plitnick: [03-29]
How Netanyahu will use the UN ceasefire resolution to prolong Gaza's
genocide: "The question for the Biden administration was how to
find a way to make a public statement to give the illusion of real
action to rein Israel in while actually changing nothing on the
ground. This resolution does that."
William I Robinson: [03-23]
Israel has formed a task force to carry out covert campaigns at US
universities: "A major Israeli news site says Israel's foreign
affairs and diaspora affairs ministries are behind the operation."
Kenneth Roth: [03-26]
Israel's attempt to destroy UNRWA is part of its starvation strategy
in Gaza.
Atef Said: [03-31]
Egypt has betrayed Palestinians in their time of greatest need:
"The Egyptian government has expressed rhetorical support for Palestinians
but is complicit in Israel's genocide in Gaza."
Abdullah Shihipar/Brandon Marshall/Jacqueline Gold: [03-27]
We study America's biggest public health crisis. This is why we speak
out against the Gaza genocide.
Norman Solomon: [03-28]
Hollywood's backlash to Jonathan Glazer's Oscar speech only proves
his point.
Mary Turfah: [03-31]
Atrocity propaganda vs. the testimony of atrocity: "Since October
7, Zionists have wielded atrocity propaganda to justify genocide, while
Palestinians have shared testimony of the atrocities they have witnessed.
The difference is not just in the truth of these stories, but also their
function."
Philip Weiss:
America's increasingly desperate and pathetic empire:
Ben Armbruster: [03-28]
Why no one should take this hawkish think tank seriously: Mark
Dubowitz, CEO of Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD).
Tom Engelhardt:
[03-24]
A slow-motion World War III? "Imperial decline (up close and
personal) in the age of climate change."
[03-31]
Chalmers Johnson, Ending the Empire. Reprints a long and
important essay from 2007, but so long after the author's death,
I'd rather attribute this to the author of the new introduction.
Johnson's essays and books have held up remarkably well over
the years: Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American
Empire (2000; revised 2004); The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism,
Secrecy, and the End of the Republic (2004); and Nemesis:
The Last Days of the American Republic (2007). His essays
made sufficient impact on me that when I collected my Bush-era
blog posts, I titled them
The Last Days of the American
Empire: 2000-2009.
Julia Gledhill/William D Hartung: [03-26]
Spending unlimited: The Pentagon's budget follies come at a
high price. The Pentagon's latest budget is $895 billion,
which doesn't count, well, lots of related and consequent
costs.
Jim Lobe: [03-26]
Pro-Israel org reels in big fish: A former CENTCOM commander:
Frank McKenzie, now officially employed by the "Likud-aligned"
Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA).
Steven Simon: [03-19]
Tom Friedman's strange case for a US military presence in Syria:
"The NYT columnist is still peddling the old 'we're fighting them
there so we don't have to here' chestnut."
Election notes:
Nicole Narea: [03-26]
Should we care about RFK Jr. and his new running mate? "The Kennedy
conspiracy theorist, his VP pick Nicole Shanahan, and their potential
to upend the 2024 presidential election, explained."
Related:
Alex Shephard:
Why Democrats shouldn't worry about RFK Jr.: "Kennedy's choice of
running mate, Nicole Shanahan, is the strongest evidence yet that his
campaign is desperate and unserious."
Nia Prater: [03-28]
What we know about RFK Jr.'s VP candidate, Nicole Shanahan.
Mother a Chinese immigrant, grew up poor, majored in Asian Studies,
then got a law degree and founded a tech company. Married into a
lot of money, divorced four years later, keeping enough to hold
considerable swap over RFK Jr., who didn't exactly earn his way
either. Donated to Pete Buttigieg in 2020, marking her has a
Democrat (but not much of one).
Brittany Gibson: [03-28]
RFK Jr's vice presidential pick calls IVF 'one of the biggest lies
being told about women's health'. After Alabama, this doesn't
strike me as a very savvy introductory political ploy. For more on
how IVF is playing politically:
Madison Fernandez/Ursula Perano/Ally Mutnick: [03-27]
What the IVF fight means for the battle for control of Congress.
Trump, and other Republicans:
Zack Beauchamp: [03-28]
How MAGA broke the media.
Jonathan Chait: [03-30]
Republican billionaires no longer upset about insurrection: "The
absurd rationalizations of Trump's oligarchs."
Chas Danner: [03-30]
Trump is into kidnapped Biden shibari: Refers to "a truck tailgate
meme about kidnapping President Joe Biden, tying him up with rope, and
tossing him in the back of a pickup." Trump seems to approve.
Igor Derysh:
Tim Dickinson: [03-25]
'Bloodbath,' 'vermin,' 'dictator' for a day: A guide to Trump's
fascist rhetoric.
Liza Featherstone:
Donald Trump's crusade against electric vehicles is getting racist.
Francesca Fiorentini: [03-29]
Handmaids of the patriarchy: "Republicans offer a lesson in how
not to win women back to their party."
Shane Goldmacher/Maggie Haberman: [03-26]
Trump isn't reaching out to Haley and her voters. Will it matter?
Link to this article was more explicit, quoting Steve Bannon: "Screw
Nikki Haley -- we don't need her endorsement." But as the article
notes, many Republicans who once grumbled about Trump wound up
"bending the knee."
Sarah Jones: [03-29]
The time Trump wished everyone a 'Happy Good Friday': "Trump
doesn't have to be pious. He doesn't have to understand what holy
days mean to his supposed co-religionists. He just has to infuriate
their enemies -- and he's good at that."
Robert Kuttner: [03-27]
The corrupt trifecta of Yass, Trump, and Netanyahu: "Yass's
payoffs to Trump are part of his efforts to destroy democracy in
the US and Israel, while helping China."
Adam Lashinsky: [03-25]
Trump's new stock deal is just another pig in a poke:
I don't give investment advice. But I assure you that a company
with $3.4 million in revenue and $49 million in losses over the
past nine months is not worth $5 billion. Buy into shares of any
company with those numbers and you are certain to be taken for
a sucker.
That Donald Trump will be the one doing the bamboozling means
that investors in his public media company might as well be making
a political donation to his campaign or contributing to a Trump
legal defense fund instead.
Julianne Malveaux: [03-31]
Those ridiculous retiring Republicans: Four Republican Reps have
resigned this year -- Kevin McCarthy (CA), Bill Johnson (OH), Ken Buck
(CO), and Mike Gallagher (WS) -- unable to cope with a party that eats
its own.
Andrew Marantz: [03-27]
Why we can't stop arguing about whether Trump is a fascist:
Review of a new book on the question, Did It Happen Here?
Perspectives on Fascism and America, edited by Daniel
Steinmetz-Jenkins. Without having read the book, I can probably
rattle off a dozen arguments for and against, but to matter, you
not only have to have some historical background but also an
interest in certain possible political dynamics and outcomes --
which makes it a question those on the left are both inclined
to ask and answer affirmatively: from where we stand, knowing
what we know, Trump and his movement are indeed very fascist,
at least inasmuch as they hate us and wish to see us destroyed,
as have all fascists before them. However, that's mostly useful
just to us, to whom labeling someone a fascist suffices as a
sophisticated and damning critique. Others' mileage may vary,
depending on what other questions they are concerned with, and
how Trump aligns or differs from his fascist forebears. One such
question is does knowing whether Trump is a fascist help you to
oppose him? It probably does within the left, but not so much
with others.
Amanda Marcotte: [03-26]
Trump loves to play the victim -- NY appeals court bailout shows he's
the most coddled person alive: "There appears to be no end of
breaks for a spoiled rich boy who has never done a decent thing in
his 77 years."
Dana Milbank: [03-29]
Trump can't remember much. He hopes you won't be able to, either.
Too bad Trump's opponent doesn't seem to have the recall and articulation
to remind people.
Ruth Murai: [03-30]
Donald Trump stoops to lowest low yet with violent post of Biden:
"Let's call it what it is: stochastic terrorism."
Timothy Noah:
Trump's unbearable temptation to dump his Truth Social stock:
"Would he really screw over MAGA investors to cover his gargantuan
legal debts? Don't bet against it."
Rick Perlstein: [03-27]
The Swamp; or, inside the mind of Donald Trump: "His orations
about migrants are a pastiche of others' golden oldies. Exhibit A:
the lie that migrants are sent from prisons and mental institutions."
Catherine Rampell:
[03-25]
Two myths about Trump's civil fraud trial: So, after a judge
cut down and postponed the full bond requirement that every other
defendant has had to live with, Trump "shall live to grift another
day." The myths?
First, that Trump's white-collar cases are "victimless" and therefore
not worth enforcement. And second, that every lawsuit and charge
against him plays into his persecution narrative, thereby strengthening
him as a presidential candidate.
Both criticisms are off-base, at least in a society that values
rule of law.
[03-29]
The internet was supposed to make humanity smarter. It's failing.
I wasn't sure where to file this, but a quick look at her examples
of internet stupidity led me to the simplest conclusion, which is
under her other article on Trump. But I'm tempted to argue that the
problem is less the internet than who "we" are. I personally haven't
the faintest sense that the internet has made me dumber. I use it to
fact check myself dozens of times each week, which I couldn't have
done before it. This very column is ample evidence of the internet's
ability to make extraordinary amount of information widely available.
I couldn't do what I do without it. Indeed, I couldn't know what I
know. There are problems, of course. The internet is an accelerator
of all kinds of information, right and wrong, good and bad, or just
plain frivolous. It's also a great diffuser, scattering information
so widely that few people have common references. (Unlike when I was
growing up, and everyone knew Edward Murrow, and a few of us even
knew I.F. Stone.) Of course, those properties sound more neutral
than they are. The internet can be viewed as a market, which has
been severely skewed to favor private interests over public ones.
That's something we need to work on.
Eugene Robinson: [03-28]
Trump's Bible grift is going to backfire: I think his reasoning --
"some of them might actually read it" is way off base. I mean, who
actually reads the Bible? I never did. I'm not sure I knew anyone
who did. I remember being shocked when I found out it was included
in the list of the "Great Books" curriculum: the very idea that you
could just sit down or curl up and read it through, like Plato's
Republic and Dante's Inferno. All we ever did was
hunt for quotes -- preferably short ones -- that we could use as
an authority, because that's what everyone used the Bible for.
And even if your quote-hunting goes long and deep, it's not like
you're open to discovery; it's usually just confirmation bias. So
no, I don't think there's any reason to think that people fool
enough to buy a Bible from Trump are going to wise up. The best
I'm hoping for is that they become embarrassed at having fallen
for such an obvious con.
Chauncey DeVega: [03[31]
The "martyrdom" of Donald J Trump: "It's all slapstick comedy:
Posing as a Christ-like figure is so outlandish and absurd."
Amanda Marcotte: [03-28]
Trump Bibles make a mockery of Christianity -- and that's exactly
why MAGA will eat them up.
Michael Tomasky:
Trump's Bible stunt isn't brilliant. It's insanely desperate.
You have this guy who's most attractive brand is that he's so insanely
rich that, walking on air above the dismal swamp, he can't be bought,
yet he can't resist truly petty scams to profit off his name -- not
just the Bibles and the sneakers, but also things that aren't even
things, like NFTs. It's really rather shocking that he has no one who
can recognize when he's about to embarrass himself so, but he's worked
very hard to only keep total flatterers on hand, insulated by shields
that deny any credibility to the outside world. He's really deep in
"Emperor's New Clothes" territory.
Jennifer Rubin:
[03-20]
We ignore Trump's defects at our peril: An obvious point, but
not just the defects -- the whole package is profoundly disturbing.
I included this column for the title, but it's mostly a q&a,
starting with one about the Schumer speech calling for new elections
in Israel, which she answers with a real howler: "The United States
and Israel generally avoid influencing each other's domestic politics,
so this was quite a shock to some." Ever hear of Sheldon Adelson?
Granted, it's mostly Israel interfering with America -- maybe AIPAC
has American figureheads, but they always march to the orders of
whoever's in power in Israel -- but I can think of examples, even
if they're mostly more subtle than Schumer.
[03-24]
Other than Trump, virtually no one was doing better four years ago.
By the way, this is a bullshit metric. It was pushed hard by Reagan
in 1984, knowing that America had been mired in a Fed-induced recession
in 1980, but was then rebounding as interest rates dropped. Carter wasn't
blameless for the recession -- he had, after all, appointed Volcker --
and Reagan did goose the recovery with his budget-busting tax cuts and
military spending, but that's overly simplistic. Same today, although
the depths of the 2020 recession were so severe that Biden couldn't help
but look good in comparison. That, as Rubin notes, some people can't see
that is a problem, potentially a big one if amnesia and delusion lead
to a second Trump term. So yeah, Democrats need to remind us of Trump's
massive failures, and real things accomplished under Biden (even though
many of them, like infrastructure, haven't had much impact yet).
But we
should be aware of two flaws in the argument: one is that it takes a
long time to fully understand the impact of a presidency; the other is
that one's personal effect is often misleading. Personally, I did great
during the Reagan years, but maybe being 30-38 had something to do with
that? But we now know that the most significant political change was
the uncoupling of wages and productivity increases -- something that
was made possible by a major shift of leverage from labor to business --
which more than any other factor (including tax cuts and growing trade
deficits) massively increased inequality. I didn't fully understand
that at the time, but I did detect that something had gone terribly
wrong, when I would quip that America's only growth industry was
fraud. While I could point to a number of examples at the time, it
took longer to realize that Bill Clinton was one of them -- a point
that many Democrats still haven't wised up to. But even today, some
people can't even see the fraud Trump peddles.
Margaret Sullivan:
Sophia Tesfaye: [03-31]
Trump unloads on Republican "cowards and weaklings" in Easter Sunday
meltdown.
Katrina vanden Heuvel: [02-27]
If Trump wins, he'll be a vessel for the most regressive figures
in US politics: "A Trump presidency would usher in dark
consortium dedicated to stripping millions of Americans of our
freedoms."
Amy B Wang/Marianne LeVine: [03-27]
Trump has sold $60 bibles, $399 sneakers and more since leaving
office.
George F Will: [03-29]
These two GOP Senate candidates exemplify today's political squalor:
Kari Lake (AZ) and Bernie Moreno (OH). This is a tough read, and I'm
not sure it's all that rewarding -- e.g., he refers to Moreno's opponent,
Sherrod Brown, as "a progressive reliably wrong -- and indistinguishable
from Trump," as he tries to find the most extremely right-wing vantage
point possible from which to attack Republicans like Trump who aren't
pure enough. But at least from that perspective, Will doesn't imagine
pro-business Democrats to be "radical communists."
For what it's worth, I regard Will as the most despicable of all
the Washington Post columnists -- a group that once included Charles
Krauthammer and still gives space to Marc Thiessen -- his interest
in baseball has always been genuine and occasionally thoughtful.
I'm not up for this at the moment, but if you're so inclined:
You can't get thrown out for thinking, so take a swing at George
Will's baseball quiz. (I might have once, but question 2 offers
as an option a player I've never heard of: Adam Dunn, who it turns
out hit 462 home runs, but clearly isn't the answer. Despite that
bit of ignorance, I'm pretty sure I would have gotten that question
right. I suspect I could figure out most of the combinations, but
most of the rest are too obscure even for me in my prime.)
Amanda Yen: [03-31]
Trump just won't stop attacking hush-money judge's daughter:
"It's the fourth time he's gone after Judge Juan Merchan's daughter
in the past week."
Biden and/or the Democrats:
Eugene Daniels/Alexander Ward/Jonathan Lemire: [03-26]
Harris finds herself, often, a half step further than Biden on
Israel: "The administration says there's no daylight between
her and the president's Israel stances." This suggests that she's
saying what they agreed they need to say, while Biden slips up
and reverts to his customary obeisance.
Igor Derysh: [03-27]
Democrat wins Alabama special election in red district after
campaigning on abortion rights and IVF: Marilyn Lands, who won
Alabama House District 10.
Jonathan Guyer: [03-28]
How Biden boxed himself in on Gaza: "The president draws on 50
years of unflagging support for Israel, and not even a humanitarian
crisis can dislodge him from that viewpoint."
Tom Hastings: [03-31]
How Biden is wrecking everything: A little tongue-in-cheek.
"Contrast that to how Trump saved America."
Toluse Olorunnipa: [03-29]
At glitzy Biden fundraiser, three presidents unite to blast Trump:
And to be blasted by protesters, at an event the "Biden campaign says
brought in more than $26 million."
Andrew Prokop: [03-28]
Is Biden on track for defeat? The debate, explained. I think this
is mostly bullshit. Both sides still have a long time to make what
should be fairly simple cases, and any jockeying along the way isn't
likely to matter much. The ultimate question will be which candidate
do you want to put out to pasture and be done with the most. Biden's
big advantage is that even if he wins, his second term will mostly
be invisible, with not much happening (other than the odd disaster).
On the other hand, if Trump wins, he's going to be in your face every
fucking day -- and figure on disasters being much more frequent and
severe, because Republicans don't believe in prevention, or in fixing
things afterwards.
Legal matters and other crimes:
Climate and environment:
Nick Dearden: [03-28]
The global laws that help corporations block climate change.
Jennifer Hassan: [03-30]
Fears of environmental disaster rise as ship sinks after Houthi
attack.
Umair Irfan: [03-29]
Why fossil fuel producers are oddly optimistic in the climate change
era: "Coal, oil, and natural gas producers have found their vision
for a low-carbon world."
Jeff Jones/Eleanor Stein: [03-25]
The single most important thing President Biden can do for the climate
is enforce an immediate cease-fire in Gaza.
Kylie Mohr: [03-28]
Yes, even most temperate landscapes in the US can and will burn:
"Wildfire risk is increasing everywhere, especially in the East and
South."
Edgar Sandoval/Colbi Edmonds/Emma Goldberg: [03-31]
Travelers stranded by highway collapse begin to leave Big Sur:
"About 2,000 motorists, mostly tourists, were stuck in the area on
Saturday night after a section of Highway 1 fell into the ocean."
Mitch Smith/Catrin Einhorn: [03-29]
Iowa fertilizer spill kills nearly all fish across 60-mile stretch of
rivers: Pic shows the Nishnabotna, but it flows into the Missouri,
which flows into the Mississippi, which empties into the Gulf of Mexico,
which in turn feeds the Gulf Stream, so, you know, dilution helps, but
this isn't done yet.
Economic matters:
Dean Baker: Sorry for the bits, here and elsewhere,
where sentences tend to tumble down hills as each clause reveals a
premise that you should know but probably don't, hence requiring
another and another. I know that proper form is to start from the
premises and build your way up, but that's a lot of work, often
winding up with many more points than the one you wanted to make.
I do that a lot, but two examples here are especially egregious:
each could be turned into a substantial essay (but who wants to
read, much less write, one of those?).
[03-26]
Relitigating the pandemic: School closings and vaccine sharing.
There's been a constant refrain about how school closings have
irrevocably stunted the intellectual growth of children. Baker
mostly checks their math, rather than taking on the bigger issue
of whether the nose-to-the-grindstone cult that took over policy
control under the guise of "No Child Left Behind" (which, sure,
wasn't all that different from the "rote learning" that dominated
the first century of mass education, and like all test-driven
regimes was all about leaving children behind, at least once
their basic indoctrination has been accomplished -- the whole
point of mass education in the first point [see Michael B Katz:
The Irony of Early School Reform]).
At some point, I should write more about education, including
how hard I find it to reconcile my political belief in universal
free education with my grim view of what we might call our
actually-existing system. For now, I'll just point out that
Astra Taylor's brilliant section on curiosity in her book
The Age of Insecurity: Coming Together as Things Fall Apart.
Fifty-some years ago, I tried to figure out why my own educational
experience had been so disastrous, which led me through books like
those by Katz (op. cit.), Paul Goodman (Compulsory Mis-Education
and the Community of Scholars), Paulo Freire (Pedagogy of the
Oppressed), and Charles Weingarten and Neal Postman's Teaching
as a Subversive Activity.
Baker then goes on to talk about America's peculiar system for
developing vaccines against Covid-19, which was to focus on the
most expensive, most technically sophisticated, and (to a handful
of private investors) most profitable system possible, making it
unlikely that the world could share the benefits. It is some kind
of irony that America ultimately suffered more from the pandemic
than any other "developed" nation -- other aspects of our highly
politicized profit-driven health care system saw to that, but it
was by design that in every segment the poor would suffer worst,
in health, and indeed in education.
[03-27]
There ain't no libertarians, just politicians who want to give all
the money to the rich. Responding to the Wallace-Wells column
on Argentina's new president, Javier Milei -- you may recall that
before he was elected, I predicted he'd quickly become the worst
president anywhere in the world; let's just say he's still on that
trajectory, although he's been slowed down a bit by the gravity of
reality, so he's not yet as bad as he would be if he had more power
(a phenomenon I trust you observed close enough with Donald Trump):
Baker explains:
The piece talked about how Milei calls himself as an anarchist, with
the government just doing basic functions, like defending the country
and running the criminal justice system. Otherwise, Milei would
eliminate any role for government, if he had his choice.
It is humorous to hear politicians make declarations like this.
As a practical matter, almost all of these self-described anarchists
would have a very large role for the government. What they want to do
is to write the rules in ways that sends income upwards and then just
pretend it is the natural order of things.
The "natural order of things" is what conservatives are all about,
as long as they're the ones on top of the totem pole. The more common
word used for Milei is libertarian, which is how people on top like
to think of themselves as being free (they turn conservative when
they look down, and realize that their freedom depends on repressing,
even enslaving, others). Michael Lind was onto something when he said
that libertarianism had actually been tested historically; we tend to
forget that, because the term at the time was feudalism. Charles Koch
is the great American libertarian -- I know more about his fantasy
world than most, because I used to typset books for him during his
Murray Rothbard period -- and no one more exemplifies a feudal lord.
Baker goes on to reiterate his usual shtick starting with patents,
continuing on to a pitch for his book,
Rigged
(free online, and worth the time).
[03-28]
Profits are still rising, why is the Fed worried about wage growth?
[03-29]
Social Security retirement age has already been raised to 67.
[03-31]
Do we need to have a Cold War with China?: Responds to a Paul
Krugman column --
Bidenomics is making China angry. That's okay. -- that I didn't
see much point of including on its own. Much more detail here worth
reading, but here's the end:
The basic point here is that we should care a lot about our relations
with China. That doesn't mean we should structure our economy to make
its leaders happy. We need to implement policies that support the
prosperity and well-being of people in the United States. But we also
need to try to find ways to cooperate with China in areas where it is
mutually beneficial, and we certainly should not be looking for ways
to put a finger in their eye.
Ryan Cooper: [02-07]
Why were inflation hawks wrong? "Economists like Larry Summers
predicted that bringing inflation down would require a large increase
in unemployment. It didn't."
Inequality.org: [03-24]
Total US billionaire wealth is up 88 percent over four years.
David Moscrop: [03-29]
Welcome to a brave new world of price gouging: "Sellers have
always had access to more information than buyers, and 'dynamic
pricing,' which harnesses the power of algorithms and big data,
is supercharging this asymmetry."
Alex Moss/Timi Iwayemi: [03-29]
Senators' latest attempt to enrich Big Pharma must not prevail:
"Patents are meant to encourage actual innovation, not monster
corporate profits." Given how little bearing patents have on actual
innovation, you'd think that argument would have dropped by the
wayside, but the profits are so big those who seek them will say
anything.
Kenny Stancil: [03-27]
Jerome Powell's fingerprints are on the next banking crisis:
"Not only did Federal Reserve chair Jerome Powell's post-2016
regulatory rollbacks and supervisory blunders contribute significantly
to the 2023 banking crisis, his current opposition to stronger capital
requirements is setting the stage for the next crisis."
Yanis Varoufakis: [03-28]
"Debt is to capitalism what Hell is to Christianity": Interview
by David Broder with the Greek economist, who has a new film series
where he explains "how elites used the financial crisis to terrorize
Europe's populations into submission."
Ukraine War: Further details, blame, and other
ruminations about the Moscow theatre terror attack have been moved to
a following section. Worth noting here that if you're a war architect
in Kyiv or Moscow (or Washington), the terror attack is bound to look
like a second front, even if the two are unconnected. With the war
hopelessly stalemated, both sides are looking for openings away from
the front: Russia has increased drone attacks in Ukrainian cities
far from the front (in one case, infringing on Polish air space);
Ukraine has also sent drones over the Russian border, as well as
picked off targets in Crimea and the Black Sea, and seems to have
some capacity for clandestine operations within Russia. The result
has been a dangerous bluring of respect for "red lines," which
could quickly turn catastrophic (nuclear weapons and power plants
are the obvious threats, but lesser-scale disasters are possible,
and could quickly turn into chain reactions).
The only possible answer has always been to negotiate a truce which
both sides can live with, preferably consistent with the wishes of the
people most directly affected (which in the case of Crimea and most of
Donbas means ethnic Russians who had long opposed Ukraine's drift to
the West). Also, the Biden administration needs to discover where
America's real interests lie, which is in peace and cooperation
with all nations. The idea that the US benefits by degrading and
isolating Russia is extremely short-sighted. (Ditto for China, Iran,
and many others the self-appointed hyper-super-duper-power thinks
it's entitled to bully.)
Connor Echols: [03-29]
Diplomacy Watch: NATO, Russia inch closer to confrontation.
David Ignatius:
[03-29]
Zelensky: 'We are trying to find some way not to retreat'.
Even with the most sympathetic interviewer in the world, he's
starting to sound pathetic. For another example of Ignatius
trying to champion a loser, see:
[03-19]
Liz Cheney still plays to make a difference in the election.
Sorry for the disrespect -- I do have some, for Zelensky and
Cheney (though maybe not for Ignatius), but I couldn't resist
the line. Both have maneuvered themselves into positions that
appear principled but are untenable, with their options limited
on both ends. Zelensky's matters much more. When he was elected,
he had to make a choice, either to try to lead a reduced but
still substantial nation into Europe and peace, or fight to
regain territories that had always opposed the European pivot.
He chose the latter, and failed: the chances of him winning any
substantial amount of territory back are very slim, while the
costs of continuing the war are daunting (even if the US and
Europe can continue to support him, which is becoming less
certain). But if he's willing to cut his losses, the deal to
end the war is distasteful but pretty straightforward. And so
is the entry of the Ukraine that he still controls into Europe.
Of course, doing so will disappoint the war party (especially
Ignatius, and count Cheney in there, too). As for Cheney, I
don't see any options. She has no popular support to maneuver,
and no real moral authority either.
Robert Kagan: [03-28]
Trump's anti-Ukraine view dates to the 1930s. America rejected it
then. Will we now? The dean of neocon warmongers tries to pull
a fast one on you. While there is some similarity between Trump's
MAGA minions and Nazi sympathizers of the late 1930s -- still not
as obvious as the direct line between Fred and Donald Trump -- the
much derided "isolationists" of the pre-WWII period spanned the
whole political spectrum, as they were rooted in the traditional
American distrust of standing armies and foreign entanglements,
along with hardly-isolationist ideas like the Monroe Doctrine and
the Open Door Policy.
Such views weren't rejected: even Roosevelt
respected them until Japan and Germany declared war, forcing the
US to join WWII. As the war turned, some highly-placed Americans
saw the opportunity (or in some cases the necessity) of extending
military and economic power around the globe, especially seeing
as how Europe would no longer be able to dominate Africa and Asia,
especially with communists, who had taken the lead in fighting the
Axis powers, spearheading national liberation movements.
The elites who promoted American hegemony had first to win the
political argument at home. They did this by branding those who
had rejected Wilson's League of Nations as "isolationists," the
implication being that their opposition was responsible for World
War's return, and by stirring up a "red scare," which played the
partition of Europe, the revolution in China, and the Korean War
into a colossal Cold War struggle, while also helping right-wingers
at home demolish the labor movement, and turning American foreign
policy into a perpetual warmaking machine. Kagan, like his father
and his wife, is a major cog in that machine, as should be obvious
here.
Joshua Keating: [03-28]
Therer's a shadow fleet sneaking Russian oil around the world. It's
an ecological disaster waiting to happen. "The world's next big
maritime catastrophe could involve sanctions-dodging rustbuckets."
Not something the Ukraine hawks will ever think to worry about, but
sounds to me like another good reason to settle real soon now.
Blaise Malley: [03-25]
Would House approve 'loaning' rather than giving Ukraine aid?:
"There's a new plan afoot to do just that, even if Kyiv cannot repay
it."
Jeffrey Sachs: [03-25]
Crude rhetoric can lead us to war: "The US, Russia, and China
must engage in serious diplomacy now. Name calling and personal
insults do nothing for the peace effort. They only bring us closer
to war."
Putin and Bush shared a common bond, and a temporary alliance,
in the early 2000s, as both were struck by "terror attacks" from
Islamic groups, blowback to their nations' long historical efforts
to dominate and/or exploit Muslims (which for Russia goes back to
wars against Turks and Mongols, extending to Russia's conquest of
the Caucusus and Central Asia, their Great Game with the UK, later
replaced by the US; for Americans it's mostly been driven by oil
and Israel since WWII, although the legacy of the Crusades still
pops up here and there). In recent years, Russia's "war on terror"
has taken a back seat to its war in Ukraine, but the problem flared
up again when gunmen killed 143 concert-goers at Moscow's Crocus
City Hall.
We shouldn't be surprised that when a historically
imperialist ruler takes a nationalist turn, as Putin did in going
to war to reassert Russian hegemony over Ukraine, that its other
minority subjects should get nervous, defensive, and as is so much
the fashion these days, preëmptively strike out.
The attack was claimed by ISIS-K, and Russia has since
arrested four Tajiks in connection with the crime. One should not
forget that in the 1980s, the US was very keen not only on arming
mujahideen to fight in Afghanistan against Russia but on extending
the Islamist revolt deep into the Soviet Union (Tajikistan).
Francesca Ebel: [03-27]
As death toll in Moscow attack rises to 143, migrants face fury
and raids.
Richard Foltz: [03-26]
Why Russia fears the emergence of Tajik terrorists.
Sarah Harmouch/Amira Jadoon: [03-25]
How Moscow terror attack fits ISIL-K strategy to widen agenda against
perceived enemies.
Ellen Ioanes: [03-28]
ISIS-K, the group linked to Moscow's terror attack, explained.
Ishaan Tharoor: [03-27]
Putin sees Kyiv in Moscow terrorist attack. But ISIS is its own story.
I'm reminded here of something in the afterword to Gilles Kepel's
Jihad: The Trial of Political Islam -- a book that appeared
in English in 2003, but had been written and published in French,
I think before 9/11 -- about how political Islam (including Al-Qaeda)
was in serious decline after 2000, and 9/11 was initially a desperate
ploy for attention and relevance (what American footballers call a
"hail Mary pass").
By the way, the first thing I did after 9/11 -- I was visiting
friends in Brooklyn on that date, and one was actually killed in
WTC, so it hit pretty close to home -- was to go to a bookstore
and scrounge around for something relevant to read that would give
me some historical context. The book that I found that came closest
(but not very close) to satisfying my urge was Barbara Crossette's
The Great Hill Stations of Asia, probably due to my intuition
that the terror attacks were deeply rooted in the imperialist (and
racist) past, but that specific story was too far in the past to be
of much help. The book I really wanted to find was Kepel's, which
told me everything I needed to know. So yeah, I find it plausible
that ISIS-K wanted to kick Russia just to remind them that they
have unfinished business. I don't doubt that Hamas wanted to kick
Israel in the same way -- also reminding Saudi Arabia who they were
about to get in bed with. Terrorists aren't very good at calibrating
those kicks, so sometimes they get more reaction than they really
wanted. But do they really care? Overreaction is often the worst
possible thing an offended power can do, as 9/11 and 10/7 have so
painfully demonstrated.
Around the world:
Caroline Houck: [03-29]
A very bad year for press freedom: Playing up the year-and-counting
detention of Evan Gershkovich in Russia, but there are other examples,
including many journalists killed by Israel not just recently but "over
the last two decades." On Gershkovich, see:
Vijay Prashad: [03-26]
Europe sleepwalks through its own dilemmas: With the episodic rise
of the right in America, where each fitful advance has tattered and in
some cases shredded not just the social welfare state but our entire
sense of democracy, solidarity, cohesion, and commonwealth, lots of
Americans have come to admire Europe, where social democracy for the
most part remains intact. On the other hand, what we see in European
politics, at least for those of us who see anything at all, is often
bewildering and unnerving. Don't these people realize how fortunate
they have been? Yet in many areas, as Prashad notes here, they seem
to be blind and dumb, just following whatever the direction is coming
from Washington and Davos, despite repeated failures.
David Smilde: [03-22]
Candidate registration is becoming a purge of Maduro's opposition.
The bridge:
Boeing:
Other stories:
Joshua Frank: [03-28]
As the rich speed off in their Teslas: Of life and lithium.
Sam Levin: [03-27]
Joe Lieberman, former US senator and vice-presidential nominee, dies
at 82.
More on Lieberman:
Gideon Lewis-Kraus: [03-25]
You say you want a revolution. Do you know what you mean by that?
Reviews two books: Fareed Zakaria: Age of Revolutions: Progress
and Backlash from 1600 to the Present; and Nathan Perl-Rosenthal:
The Age of Revolutions: And the Generations Who Made It, which
is more focused on the years 1760-1825.
Jeffrey St Clair: [03-29]
Roaming Charges: Nowhere men: Remembering Joe Lieberman, then
onto the bridge and other disasters.
Mari Uyehara: [03-25]
The many faces of Viet Thanh Nguyen: "The Vietnamese American
writer's leap to the mainstream comes at a moment that demands his
anti-colonialist perspective."
I've cited this article before, but my wife reminded me of it
yesterday and went on to read me several chunks. The article is by
Pankaj Mishra:
The Shoah after Gaza. It's worth reading in whole, but for now
let me just pull a couple paragraphs out from the middle:
One of the great dangers today is the hardening of the colour line
into a new Maginot Line. For most people outside the West, whose
primordial experience of European civilisation was to be brutally
colonised by its representatives, the Shoah did not appear as an
unprecedented atrocity. Recovering from the ravages of imperialism in
their own countries, most non-Western people were in no position to
appreciate the magnitude of the horror the radical twin of that
imperialism inflicted on Jews in Europe. So when Israel's leaders
compare Hamas to Nazis, and Israeli diplomats wear yellow stars at the
UN, their audience is almost exclusively Western. Most of the world
doesn't carry the burden of Christian European guilt over the Shoah,
and does not regard the creation of Israel as a moral necessity to
absolve the sins of 20th-century Europeans. For more than seven
decades now, the argument among the 'darker peoples' has remained the
same: why should Palestinians be dispossessed and punished for crimes
in which only Europeans were complicit? And they can only recoil with
disgust from the implicit claim that Israel has the right to slaughter
13,000 children not only as a matter of self-defence but because it is
a state born out of the Shoah.
In 2006, Tony Judt was already warning that 'the Holocaust can no
longer be instrumentalised to excuse Israel's behaviour' because a
growing number of people 'simply cannot understand how the horrors of
the last European war can be invoked to license or condone
unacceptable behaviour in another time and place'. Israel's
'long-cultivated persecution mania -- "everyone's out to get us" -- no
longer elicits sympathy', he warned, and prophecies of universal
antisemitism risk 'becoming a self-fulfilling assertion': 'Israel's
reckless behaviour and insistent identification of all criticism with
antisemitism is now the leading source of anti-Jewish sentiment in
Western Europe and much of Asia.' Israel's most devout friends today
are inflaming this situation. As the Israeli journalist and
documentary maker Yuval Abraham put it, the 'appalling misuse' of the
accusation of antisemitism by Germans empties it of meaning and 'thus
endangers Jews all over the world'. Biden keeps making the treacherous
argument that the safety of the Jewish population worldwide depends on
Israel. As the New York Times columnist Ezra Klein put it recently,
'I'm a Jewish person. Do I feel safer? Do I feel like there's less
antisemitism in the world right now because of what is happening
there, or does it seem to me that there's a huge upsurge of
antisemitism, and that even Jews in places that are not Israel are
vulnerable to what happens in Israel?'
One thing I want to add here is that liberal- and left-democrats
often take great pains to make clear that their criticism of Israeli
government policy, and of the people who evidently support those
policies, does not reflect or imply any criticism of Jews in America,
who are not represented by the Israeli government, even if they are
deeply sympathetic to Israel. We are also very quick to point out
that many of those most critical of Israel, both in the US and in
Israel itself, are Jewish, and often do so out of principles that
they believe are deeply rooted in Judaism.
We do this because our fundamental position is that we support
free and equal rights for all people, regardless of whose human
rights are being asserted or denied. But we're particularly sensitive
on this point, because we know that many of our number are Jewish,
so we are extra aware of when their rights have been abused, and of
their solidarity in defending the rights of others.
So we regard as scurrilous this whole propaganda line that accuses
anyone who in any way disagrees with Israeli policy with antisemitism.
We are precisely the least antisemitic people in America. Meanwhile,
the propaganda line seems to be aimed at promoting antisemitism in
several ways: it tells people who don't know better to blame all Jews
for the human rights abuses of Israel; it also reassures people who
really are antisemites that their sins are forgiven if they support
Israel; and it reaffirms the classic Zionist argument that all Jews
must flee the diaspora and resettle in Israel -- the only safe haven
in a world full of antisemitism. (It is no coincidence that many of
Zionism's biggest supporters have been, and in many cases still are,
antisemites. Balfour and Lloyd George were notorious antisemites.
Hitler himself approved the transfer of hundreds of thousands of
German Jews to Palestine.)
While none of this is hard to understand, many people don't and
won't, so it's very likely that some will take their fear and anger
over genocide out on Jews. We will denounce any such acts, as we
have always done. And as we have, and will continue to, heinous acts
by Israel. But we should be aware that what's driving this seemingly
inevitable uptick in "antisemitism" is this false propaganda line,
perpetrated by Israel and its very well heeled support network --
including most mainstream media outlets, and virtually the entire
American political elite. So when people insist you step up and
denounce antisemitism, do so. But don't forget to include the real
driving force behind antisemitism these days: the leaders of Israel.
While I was looking for a quote to wrap up this post, I ran across
a Richard Silverstein
tweet that fits nicely here:
Genocide is an unpardonable sin before God in Judaism, regardless of
who are the victims or the perpetrators. Israel's crimes are not in
my name as a Jew, nor in the name of Judaism as millions of my fellow
Diaspora Jews know it.
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Monday, March 25, 2024
Music Week
March archive
(in progress).
Music: Current count 42039 [42007] rated (+32), 31 [28] unrated (+3).
Speaking of Which ran over again. I posted what I had late
Sunday night (227 links, 9825 words; the former possibly a record,
the latter well above usual but less than 10883 for the week of
March
3. (Updated tally: 259 links, 11559 words, so may very well
be the biggest one ever.)
I got this started early Monday afternoon, but probably won't
post until late, not so much because I expect this to take much
as because I'd rather spend the time cleaning up Speaking of Which.
I'm under no delusions that what I say here will make any difference
to the world, but times like these need witnesses. And that is the
one thing I can still offer.
Not a lot of albums this week -- played a lot of old stuff again --
but I'm fairly pleased with the finds this week, including some jazz
artists not previously on my radar (Espen Berg, Roby Glod, Nicole
McCabe) and a couple old-timers who returned to form with their best
releases in years (Kahil El'Zabar, Charles Lloyd). I'll also note
that results flipped expectations for two much-hyped reissues (Joe
Henderson, Alice Coltrane).
Very little non-jazz this week, especially if you count Queen
Esther as jazz (which you should for her better releases below,
but not for the still-recommended Gild the Black Lily).
Tierra Whack came from Robert Christgau's latest
Consumer
Guide. I should replay the records he liked better than I did --
Yard Act, Les Amazones d'Afrique, the Guy Davis I
reviewed shortly after
it came out in 2021. Most other records I have similar grades for
(the three I mentioned I'm just one or two notches down on), leaving
unheard the Queen compilation and a Thomas Anderson album that isn't
streamable yet. By the way, Christgau skipped over Anderson's recent
odds & sods set, The Debris Field (Lo-Fi Flotsam and Ragged
Recriminations, 2000-2021), which I gave an A- to in my
review.
Unpacking below does not include Monday's haul, which looks to be
substantial. Most promising among the new releases is Dave Douglas
with James Brandon Lewis, but note also a new album with Kevin Sun
as Mute. Plus a lot of vault discoveries: Chet Baker/Jack Sheldon,
Yusef Lateef, Sun Ra, Art Tatum, Mal Waldron/Steve Lacy, in addition
to the Sonny Rollins already uwrapped.
New records reviewed this week:
Espen Berg: Water Fabric (2023, Odin): Norwegian
pianist, dozen or so albums since 2007. Cover shows "featuring":
Hayden Powell (trumpet), Harpreet Bansal (violin), Ellie Mäkelä
(viola), Joakim Munker (cello), Per Oddvar Johansen (drums). I'm
not often a big fan of strings, but here they take themes that
start enchanting and raise them to something magnificent.
A- [sp]
Espen Berg: The Hamar Concert (2022 [2023], NXN):
Solo piano, recorded at Kulturhus in Hamar, Norway.
B+(**) [sp]
Kahil El'Zabar's Ethnic Heritage Ensemble: Open Me, a
Higher Consciousness of Sound and Spirit (2023 [2024],
Spiritmuse): Chicago percussionist and vocalist (perhaps a bit
too much), celebrates fifty years of mostly working within this
ensemble, lately a trio with Corey Wilkes (trumpet) and Alex
Harding (baritone sax), supplemented here by James Sanders
(violin/viola) and Ishmael Ali (cello). A potent mix here,
especially on the funk classic "Compared to What" -- vocal is
perfect there.
A- [sp]
Roby Glod/Christian Ramond/Klaus Kugel: No ToXiC
(2022 [2024], Nemu): German trio -- alto/soprano sax, bass, drums --
reportedly have been playing together twenty years but discography
is thin; Glod and Kugel have an album together from 2013; Glod has
side credits back to 1992. One Connie Crothers piece, the rest joint
improv credits. The sort of free sax tour de force I always love.
A- [cd]
Julian Lage: Speak to Me (2024, Blue Note):
Guitarist, debut 2009 on EmArcy, after stints with Palmetto and
Mack Avenue landed on another major in 2021. This one leans a
bit more rock, produced by Joe Henry, with Levon Henry (sax),
Patrick Warren (keyboards), Joege Roeder (bass), and Dave King
(drums). Except when it doesn't, and I lose all interest. Then,
well, there's some piano that sounds like Kris Davis, and I'm
interested again.
B+(*) [sp]
Remy Le Boeuf's Assembly of Shadows: Heartland Radio
(2023 [2024], SoundSpore): French alto saxophonist, also plays flute,
several albums, this group a big band (third album, group named for
the first) with vocals on two tracks. Some nice passages but generally
too many classical moves for my taste, and I don't think the vocals help.
B [cd]
David Leon: Bird's Eye (2022 [2024], Pyroclastic):
Cuban-American alto saxophonist, based in Brooklyn, has a couple
previous albums, also plays soprano sax, alto flute, and piccolo.
Trio with DoYeon Kim (gayagum, voice) and Lesley Mok (percussion).
Rather sparse and scattered, with some very interesting stretches,
and some that don't do much (or worse, like the voice).
B+(**) [sp]
Charles Lloyd: The Sky Will Still Be There Tomorrow
(2024, Blue Note, 2CD): Tenor saxophonist, released this album on his
86th birthday (any reason Blue Note can't give you recording dates?),
was sort of a crossover star in the late 1960s, solidified his career
when he moved to ECM in 1989, remaining pre-eminent within his move
to Blue Note in 2013. Also plays some alto here, as well as bass and
alto flute. Backed by Jason Moran (piano), Larry Grenadier (bass),
and Brian Blade (drums), a sprawling 15 songs (90:25). Longer than
I'd like as a straight-through stream, but the CD/LP versions would
break that up into manageable chunks, and it would be hard to pick
among them. He's in fine form throughout, and the band (especially
Moran) are superb.
A- [sp]
Nicole McCabe: Live at Jamboree (2023 [2024],
Fresh Sound New Talent): Alto saxophonist, from Los Angeles,
Introducing debut from 2020, second album here. She
recorded this in Barcelona, with Iannis Obiols (impressive on
piano), Logan Kane (bass), and Ramon Prats (drums).
B+(***) [sp]
Moor Mother: The Great Bailout (2024, Anti-):
Camae Ayewa, from Philadelphia, poet first, then musician, spoken
word under this alias initially suggested hip-hop, but several
side projects moved into jazz, most notably the group Irreversible
Entanglements, and she's always had an activist angle. Numerous
guest features here, hard to follow (but seems very Anglo-themed),
music murkily industrial.
B+(*) [sp]
Willie Morris: Conversation Starter (2022 [2023],
Posi-Tone): Tenor saxophonist, from St. Louis, Discogs page adds
a III to his name. First album, quintet with Patrick Cornelius
(alto sax/alto flute), Jon Davis (piano), Adi Meyerson (bass),
and E.J. Strickland (drums), playing eight originals, two covers,
one of those from Joe Henderson.
B+(**) [sp]
Willie Morris: Attentive Listening (2023 [2024],
Posi-Tone): Second album, similar lineup, with Patrick Cornelius
(alto sax/alto flute) and Jon Davis (piano) returning, plus label
regulars Boris Kozlov (bass) and Rudy Royston (drums). Another
solid mainstream record.
B+(*) [sp]
Kjetil Mulelid: Agoja (2022 [2024], Odin):
Norwegian pianist, several albums, also electric piano and synth,
quartet with pedal steel plus bass and drums, but most tracks have
a scatter of guests, including violin, vibes, and/or some famous
horn players. Still stays within atmospheric bounds.
B+(**) [sp]
Queen Esther: Things Are Looking Up (2024, EL):
Bio is evasive beyond raised in Atlanta and "embedded" in Charleston,
Discogs says "vocalist, songwriter, lyricist, producer, musician,
actor, performance artist, TED Speaker and playwright," credits
her with 7 albums (but not yet this one), also six groups (Hoosegow,
JC Hopkins Biggish Band, The 52nd Street Blues Project, The Harlem
Experiment, The Memp0his Blood Jugband Singers, Yallopin' Hounds).
Last I heard was the banjo-fied roots album Gild the Black Lily
(an A-), so I was surprised and taken aback by the jazz diva styling
here, before the fine print revealed a Billie Holiday project, with
the few original songs credited to Lenny Molotov. Replay required,
and worth it. Promised later this year: "the alt-Americana album
Blackbirding."
A- [cd] [04-09]
Queen Esther: Rona (2023, EL): I missed this one,
only a bit more than an EP (8 songs, 29:18), in her country mode,
often with ukulele and/or strings. Mostly originals, but note that
the first cover is "Bohemian Rhapsody" -- Queen, but just one
voice, just a bit of guitar, but long at 6:39.
B+(*) [sp]
Ron Rieder: Latin Jazz Sessions (2023 [2024],
self-released): Composer, seems to be his first album, inside
pic shows him at piano but album credits Alain Mallet (piano),
one of nine musicians listed on cover, including impressive
tenor sax from Mike Tucker, flute from Fernando Brandão, and
lots of rhythm.
B+(***) [cd]
Viktoria Tolstoy: Stealing Moments (2023 [2024],
ACT): Swedish jazz singer, great-great-granddaughter of the famous
Russian writer, dozen-plus albums since 1994, sings in English,
song credits to others but I don't recognize them as standards
(mostly Ida Sand and Anna Alerstedt).
B+(*) [sp]
A Tonic for the Troops: Realm of Opportunities
(2022 [2023], Odin): Norwegian quartet led (at least all songs
composed) by Ellen Brekken (bass), with Magnus Bakken (tenor sax),
Espen Berg (piano), and Magnus Sefniassen Eide (drums), second
group album, Brekken's side credits mostly with Hedvig Mollestad.
B+(**) [sp]
Tierra Whack: World Wide Whack (2024, Interscope):
Rapper from Philadelphia, her own name (after trying Dizzle Dizz),
famous for her 13-songs-in-13-minutes mixtape Whack World
(2018), followed by a trio of EPs in 2021, and now this debut
studio album (15 tracks, 37:47). Same shtick here, short bits
with a tasty hook but scant adornment, moving easily from set
to set, like in her video.
A- [sp]
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries:
Alice Coltrane: The Carnegie Hall Concert (1971
[2024], Impulse!): Pianist and harpist, formerly Alice McLeod,
of Detroit, her mother a choir singer, others in the family had
musical careers, while she had a trio and played with others
(Terry Pollard, Terry Gibbs; possibly her first husband, singer
Kenny Hagood). She married John Coltrane in 1965, joined his
quartet in 1966 (replacing McCoy Tyner), and had three children
with him (most famous is Ravi Coltrane), but he died in 1967.
In 1968, she released her own album, A Monastic Trio,
and followed it with six more, also on Impulse!, through 1973,
continuing on other labels through 1978, a few more later on.
This live concert, part of which was previously released in 2018
as Live at Carnegie Hall, 1971, happened about the same
time as what was perhaps her best known album, Journey in
Satchidananda appeared. Title song leads off here (15:02),
followed by three more pieces, centered on the 28:09 "Africa."
She did much to develop the spiritual side of her husband's
legacy, and if you follow the reviews, you may detect its
center of gravity shifting from him to her: she was, after all,
the one who lived the life. But compared to most recent reissues,
this concert most securely links her back to his music, most
obviously through bassists Jimmy Garrison and Cecil McBee, and
saxophonists Pharoah Sanders and Archie Shepp. But her harp is
developing (though it is her piano that brings "Africa" to its
climax), and she adds harmonium (Kumar Kramer) and tamboura (Tulsi
Reynolds), along with two drummers (Ed Blackwell and Clifford
Jarvis). I've listened to most of her albums, but this is the
first one that really moved me.
A- [sp]
Joe Henderson: Power to the People (1969 [2024],
Craft): Tenor saxophonist (1937-2001), his early records for Blue
Note (1963-67) helped define that label's golden age, his move
to Milestone (1968-77) much less storied (although Milestone
Profiles found enough for an A-). Pitchfork calls this "an
essential document of a transitional moment in which everything
in jazz seemed up for grabs." It was a time of intense political
ferment, whence the title, but for jazz musicians, it was more
stress as labels dwindled and died. With names on the cover:
Herbie Hancock (piano/electric), Jack De Johnette (drums), Ron
Carter (bass/electric), Mike Lawrence (trumpet on two tracks).
The band helps, but the only real point is the saxophone, which
wakes you up with a few strong solos, including a monster to end.
B+(***) [sp]
Old music:
Espen Berg Trio: Bølge (2017 [2018], Odin):
Norwegian pianist, albums since 2007, this the second of four
trio albums with Bárður Reinert Poulsen (bass) and Simon Olderskog
Albertsen (drums). Opens with a Sting cover, then on to nine Berg
originals. Strong album, good rhythmic sense.
B+(***) [sp]
Espen Berg Trio: Fjære (2021 [2022], Odin):
Same piano-bass-drums trio, but three more names in fine print
on cover: Mathias Eick (trumpet, 2 tracks), Silje Nørgard (vocal,
1 track, the Paul Simon song, "I'd Do It for Your Love"), Hanna
Paulsberg (tenor sax, 1 track).
B+(**) [sp]
The Herb Geller Quartet: I'll Be Back (1996 [1998],
Hep): Plays alto and sopranino sax here, with Ed Harris (guitar),
Thomas Biller (bass), and Heinrich Köbberling (drums), on four
originals and six standards (including a Jobim).
B+(**) [r]
The Herb Geller Quartet: You're Looking at Me
(1997 [1998], Fresh Sound): Alto and soprano sax, featuring Jan
Lundgren (piano), with Dave Carpenter (bass) and Joe LaBarbera
(drums), on ten standards followed by four tracks Geller wrote
for a musical about Josephine Baker.
B+(***) [r]
Herb Geller and Brian Kellock: Hollywood Portraits
(1999 [2000], Hep): Duets, alto/soprano sax and piano, Kellock is
Scottish, did some very good duets with Tommy Smith shortly after
this one. Geller composed twenty pieces here, each named for a
famous actress, most 1930s through 1950s.
B+(***) [r]
Herb Geller With Don Friedman: At the Movies (2007,
Hep): Alto/soprano sax and piano, also with Martin Wind (bass), Hans
Braber (drums), and Martien Oster (guitar on four tracks, of 13).
Standards, back cover names some but not all of the movies.
B+(**) [r]
Nicole McCabe: Introducing Nicole McCabe (2020,
Minaret): Alto saxophonist, not much biography I can find, but
studied in Portland and at USC, is based in Los Angeles, teaches
there, released this debut with George Colligan (piano, terrific),
Jon Lakey (bass), and Alan Jones (drums), plus Charlie Porter
(trumpet, a plus on three tracks). Very strong performance, with
a nice touch on the rare slow bits.
A- [sp]
Nicole McCabe: Landscapes (2022, Fresh Sound New
Talent): Second album, alto saxophonist continue to impress, this
time with piano-bass-drums I've never heard of, an equally obscure
vocalist adding scat I barely noticed to one track, forgotten by
the next.
B+(***) [sp]
Queen Esther: Talkin' Fishbowl Blues (2004, EL):
First album, although a duo with guitarist Elliott Sharp as Hoosegow
came out in 1996. Produced by Jack Spratt, tagged as "Black Americana,"
with a dark cover of "Stand By Your Man."
B+(**) [sp]
Queen Esther: What Is Love? (2010, EL): Jazz
ensemble this time, piano trio plus four horns (Patience Higgins
on tenor sax, plus trumpet, trombone, and French horn), with JC
Hopkins producing and writing most of the songs. The occasional
standard makes it easier to appreciate the precise nuance the
singer is capable of.
B+(***) [sp]
Queen Esther: The Other Side (2014, EL):
This one, with nine originals, two covers of Paul Pena (q.v.),
one each from Charlie Rich and Bryan & Wilda Creswell,
is filed under country rock. Band is mostly guitar, including
pedal and lap steel, but note that the fiddle player (just
two tracks) is Charles Burnham.
B+(**) [sp]
Limited Sampling: Records I played parts of, but not enough
to grade: -- means no interest, - not bad but not a prospect,
+ some chance, ++ likely prospect.
Nicole McCabe: Improvisations (2022, Minaret, EP):
Solo alto sax with pedals, for something of a bagpipe effect. Four
tracks, 20:46.
[1/4 tracks, 5:01/20:46]
- [bc]
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Owen Broder: Hodges: Front and Center, Vol. Two (Outside In Music) [04-12]
- Benji Kaplan: Untold Stories (self-released) [05-01]
- João Madeira/Margarida Mestre: Voz Debaixo (4DaRecord) [02-17]
- Ivo Perelman Quartet: Water Music (RogueArt) * [04-00]
- PNY Quintet: Over the Wall (RogueArt) * [03-00)
- Ernesto Rodrigues/Bruno Parinha/João Madeira: Into the Wood (Creative Sources) [01-09]
- Sonny Rollins: Freedom Weaver: The 1959 European Tour Recordings (Resonance, 3CD) [04-20]
- Dave Schumacher & Cubeye: Smoke in the Sky (Cellar) [04-19]
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Sunday, March 24, 2024
Speaking of Which
I was struck by
this meme: "If Israelis stop fighting there will be peace. If
Palestinians stop fighting there will be no more Palestinians."
The first line is certainly true. This latest war has been so
devastating that it's hard to imagine any fight left -- at least
of the sort that would strike out at Israelis beyond their wall.
The other obvious point is that there's no risk in trying. If
Hamas does attack again, Israel can always strike back, and that
reaction will be better understood than the systematic, genocidal
war Israel is waging.
The second is less obvious, depending on what you mean by
"stop fighting." Hamas has never had the capability of fighting
Israel like Israel fights Gaza. Hamas has no air force, no navy,
no submarines, no tanks, no heavy artillery, no anti-aircraft or
anti-missile defenses, no drones. Their rockets are small and
unguided, and have never produced more than accidental damage.
Aside from the Oct. 7 jailbreak, the only way an Israeli gets
hurt is by entering Gaza, and even then the ratio of Palestinian-to-Israeli
casualties is 50-to-1 or more. That's not much of a fight.
However, the second line could be rewritten in terms that both
sides will agree with, if not agree on: "Palestinians will [only]
stop fighting when there are no more Palestinians." An army may
sensibly surrender to a more imposing power, but this will only
happen if one has hope of surviving and eventually recovering
from surrender. Germany and Japan surrendered to the US to end
WWII, but only because they believed that they would be given
a chance to return to running their own lives. (See John Dower's
Embracing Defeat for more on how Japan dealt with this.
Japan is a better example than Germany, because its government
was still intact when it surrendered, whereas Germany's was in
tatters after Hitler's suicide.) A number of American Indian
tribes surrendered with similar hopes, even though the US had
given them little reason for such hope.
But Israel's current demands for ceasefire terms, following
the genocidal threats of Israel's leaders, and the genocidal
methodology they've practiced in this war, offer little or no
hope to any Palestinian that surrender is anything but suicide.
Israelis demand absolute servility, but know that they'll never
get everyone to submit, that there will always be resistance of
some sort, and as such their security will always be at risk. This
presents them with an existential dilemma, to which there are only
three solutions: equal rights, separation, or annihilation.
They have long refused to consider equal rights. (Lots of
reasons we needn't consider here, like racism and demography.)
They've considered separation, at least within certain bounds,
but it's naturally a formula for war, so they've insisted on
being the dominant power, both by building up a huge military
advantage and by preventing Palestinians from ever developing
their own popular leadership. But the solution they've always
craved was annihilation. The problem there has been finding a
time when they could get away with it. Oct. 7 was the excuse
they were waiting for, dramatic enough that few of their allies
grasped immediately how they had goaded Hamas into action.
Even so, Israel has always had a numbers problem. America
was able to reduce its native population to levels where they
became politically and economically irrelevant, after which
annihilation no longer mattered, and some reconciliation was
possible. But for Israel, there were always too many Palestinians,
too close by, too economically developed and culturally sophisticated.
For just
these reasons, colonizers eventually gave up on Algeria and South
Africa, but only after extraordinary brutality. Israel is the last
to believe they're strong enough to beat down any and all resistance.
And that's really because they have few if any scruples against
killing every last Palestinian.
And don't for a moment think that Palestinians don't understand
this. They've lived through it for decades, and while often beaten
down, often severely, they've survived to resist again. They'll
survive this, too, and will continue to resist, as peacefully as
Israel will allow, or as violently as they can muster.
Looking further down my twitter feed:
From
Rami Jarrah: Picture of an adult Palestinian male seated on
a couch, surrounded 14 children (a couple into their teens). Text:
"Nobody in this photo is alive. Israel's right to self defence."
From
Kayla Bennett: Chart image. Text: "One of the most horrifying
graphics ever." I looked for an article including the chart, and
came up with:
From
Ryan Heuser: A link to the website for
The New York War Crimes,
reporting on propaganda published by The New York Times
(motto: "All the Consent That's Fit to Manufacture"). I haven't
figured out yet where the illustrations come from.
From
Yousef Munayer retweeted Heuser, adding: "A new poll found that
even though some 30,000 more Palestinians have been killed than
Israelis since October, half of Americans didn't know which side
has lost more lives. This has a lot to do with it."
From
Etan Nechin retweeted Chris Olley: "[Pennsylvania]'s
richest person Jeff Yass is buying Truth Social for $3 Billion so
Trump can pay off his $450 Million judgment in return for Trump
doing a 180 on his Tiktok and China stance to preserve Yass's $30
Billion-with-a-B stake in Tiktok. We call this oligarchy' when it's
elsewhere." Nechin adds: "Notably, Jeff Yass was the main financier
of Kohelet Forum, the shadowy organization behind Israel's attempted
judicial coup that was championed by the settler far right. These
oligarchs care little for democracy, only market interests." The
Wikipedia page for Yass is
here, which
documents all this and more.
From
Daniel Denvir: "Truth Social has roughly twice the monthly app
users as my niche left-wing intellectual podcast has monthly downloads.
The Dig's own healthy but rather modest financial situation suggests
to me that this company is not worth nearly $6 billion."
From
Paul Krugman: "So, did the ACA bend the cost curve? Call it
coincidence, but excess cost growth -- health spending growing
faster than GDP -- basically ended when it passed." See chart:
I'm reminded that Switzerland long had the world's second most
expensive health care system, with costs increasing in tandem with
US costs, until they adopted a universal non-profit insurance scheme.
While this was still much more expensive than systems in UK, Germany,
and France, it halted the increase, while US costs continue to rise.
ACA hasn't worked as well as Switzerland's system -- by design, it isn't
universal, and still allows (and sometimes encourages) profit-seeking --
but it was a step in the right direction.
Initial count: 227 links, 9,825 words.
Not really finished when posted late Sunday night, so some Monday
updates have been added. While sections are marked (like this),
minor edits (like the last paragraph above) are not. (Seems like
there should be a finer-grained way to do this, but I haven't
figured one out yet.
Updated count [03-25]: 259 links, 11,559 words.
Several breaking stories on Monday [03-25] are not reported or
reacted to below, but should be significant next week: Here's the
"heads up":
Luisa Loveluck/Karen DeYoung/Missy Ryan/Michael Birnbaum:
[03-25]
Netanyahu cancels delegation after US does not block UN cease-fire
call: The US, for the first time
since Israel attacked Gaza after the Oct. 7 attacks, abstained from
and didn't veto a cease-fire resolution, allowing it to pass 14-0.
This is the first concrete step that the Biden administration is
developing a conscience over Israel's genocide. A stronger signal
would have been to vote for the resolution. Stronger still would
be to withhold aid (especially munitions) until the cease-fire has
been implemented (at which point Israel won't need the arms). So
Biden still has a long ways to go, but at least he has found a new
direction. Next step will be to show Netanyahu that his tantrum is
for naught, and that his conceit that he actually runs Washington --
which, by the way, is a big part of his political capital in Israel --
is no longer true.
PS: Yousef Munayyer tweeted after this: "The US abstention at
the UNSC today as well as Netanyahu's reaction to it should be
seen as each leader's attempt to manage domestic audiences. What
matters is Biden signed off on $4billion more in weapons for
Israel to further the genocide. Keep your eye on the ball."
Mark Berman/Jonathan O'Connell/Shayna Jacobs: [03-25]
Trump wins partial stay of fraud judgment, allowed to post $175
million: This postpones foreclosure on Trump properties, for
ten days at least (the time allowed to post the bond).
Shayna Jacobs/Devlin Barrett: [03-25]
NY judge sets firm April 15 trial date in Trump's historic hush
money case.
Top story threads:
Israel:
Mondoweiss:
[03-18]
Day 164: Israeli army storms al-Shifa again, aid reaches Jabalia for
first time in months: "Over a million people in Gaza face 'imminent'
famine as UNRWA aid trucks arrive in northern Gaza for the first time
in months. Meanwhile, the Israeli army's Chief of Staff says 'a long
way to go' until Israel's military objectives are achieved."
[03-19]
Day 165: Israeli attacks escalate on Rafah, al-Shifa Hospital invasion
enters second day: "After a night of heavy bombardment the PA warns
Israel's Rafah offensive has begun. Meanwhile, the invasion of al-Shifa
hospital continues; all communication with medical staff trapped inside
the hospital has been silent since Monday evening."
[03-20]
Day 166: Israel kills Gaza officials handling food delivery to the
north; Canada votes to halt arms sales to Israel: "Hamas slams
Israel for 'spreading chaos' after an Israeli airstrike killed two
local police officers in charge of securing and delivering food to
north Gaza. In the West Bank, Israeli forces and settlers kill two
Palestinians."
[03-21]
Day 167: Israel has killed over 100 aid workers in Gaza in the last
week: "Israel has killed over 100 aid workers in Gaza over the
past week as its military siege of al-Shifa Hospital continues.
Meanwhile, the Netanyahu government continues planning for an
invasion of Rafah."
[03-22]
Day 168: US advances UN Security Counsil ceasefire resolution as
al-Shifa Hospital siege enters fifth day: "The siege of al-Shifa
Hospital enters its fifth day as the Israeli army threatens to blow
up the hospital, while the U.S.'s proposed UNSC resolution uses
nebulous language that does not call for an "immediate" ceasefire.
[03-23]
Day 169: Israel kills 7 aid-seekers in northern Gaza, 4 children in
Rafah as siege of al-Shifa Hospital enters sixth day: "Israel
continued its airstrikes on Rafah, killing four children, while in
northern Gaza Israel turned back food aid for the second time in a
week and killed at least 7 Palestinian aid-seekers near the Kuwaiti
roundabout."
[03-24]
Day 170: Israel assaults al-Shifa, Nasser, and al-Amal hospitals
in one day: "Israeli forces ordered Palestinians inside al-Amal
Hospital in Khan Younis to leave 'naked,' while survivors of the
al-Shifa Hospital raid witnessed numerous atrocities committed by
the Israeli army. In Jerusalem, Israeli settlers stormed al-Aqsa."
Sabreen Akhter: [03-21]
When children are present in a genocide.
Faress Arafat: [03-23]
Gaza's children are enduring overwhelming trauma: "A Palestinian
nurse from the al-Shifa Hospital recalls his experience tending to
the children wounded and killed in the war."
Mohamad Bazzi: [03-21]
The Gaza famine is human-made. And the US is complicit in this
catastrophe.
Cate Brown: [03-22]
Israel announces largest West Bank land seizure since 1993 during
Blinken visit.
Eliza Griswold: [03-21]
The children who lost limbs in Gaza: "More than a thousand children
who were injured in the war are now amputees. What do their futures
hold?"
Isaac Chotiner: [03-21]
The brutal conditions facing Palestinian prisoners: "Since the
attacks of October 7th, Israel has held thousands of people from
Gaza and the West Bank in detention camps and prisons." Interview
with Tal Steiner, whose Public Committee Against Torture in Israel
tries to monitor such things.
Stephanie Guilloud: [03-20]
There is nothing we can do about Israel other than everything:
"The war on Gaza is being used to advance fascism and white supremacy
in the U.S. It is also opening people's eyes to global systems that
require genocide to continue. To stand with Palestine is to transform
those systems and build a different world."
Middle East Monitor: [03-13]
Satellite images show 35% of Gaza's buildings destroyed.
Mondoweiss: [03-18]
The real reason Israel stormed al-Shifa Hospital yet again: "Israel's
latest attack on al-Shifa Hospital and the successful delivery of food
aid to northern Gaza are connected. Here's how."
Yumna Patel: [03-22]
Israel's plans to replace its Palestinian labor force could spell
disaster for the Palestinian economy.
Meron Rapoport: [03-20]
The Israeli public is dispirited. So why is the right euphoric?
Jeremy Scahill:
"Man-made hell on Earth": A Canadian doctor on his medical mission
to Gaza: "Palestinian doctors 'are working on a daily basis on
the most horrific, explosive trauma that you've ever seen. They're
doing sometimes 14, 15 amputations, mostly on children, per day,
and they've been doing it for six months now."
Amna Shabana: [03-20]
'All of them are gone except me': "My friend Reem Hamadaqa barely
survived an attack on her home in Khan Younis that killed her parents
and most of her family. What do you tell a friend who has lost nearly
everything?"
Richard Silverstein: [03-23]
Amalek directive approves murders of Hamas leaders' families:
"Israel targeting Hamas leadership for elimination along with all
family members." The "Amalek directive" refers back to an earlier
[2023-10-25] post:
Israeli security cabinet orders murders of senior Hamas leaders and
families: "Ministers tasked IDF and Shin Bet with mass assassinations,
invoking a Biblical verse commanding extermination of Amalek."
Maureen Tkacik: [03-20]
What really happened on October 7? "And why, wonders a new Al
Jazeera documentary, did the media go to such lengths to concoct
gruesome X-rated versions of an attack that was harrowing enough
to begin with?" Pull quote: "Hamas had some rockets, but did it
really have the weaponry capable of mounting this level of
destruction? Western journalists have reported that Hamas was
fully responsible." Who did? Well:
By November, the IDF conceded that it had, actually, deployed
Apache helicopters and tanks to the Nova music festival that "may"
have killed "some" of the Nova festival concertgoers, in accordance
with something called the Hannibal Directive, a doctrine named for
a Carthaginian general who poisoned himself rather than be questioned
by his Roman captors, whereby the Israeli army is ordered to fire
upon its own troops to prevent the enemy from taking those troops
hostage. Around noon on October 7, according to Israeli newspapers
cited in the documentary, the IDF may have invoked a version of the
Hannibal directive, expanded to include Israeli civilians, and in
accordance began blindly opening fire with rockets and helicopter
gunships on any person or vehicle seen moving across the border
with Gaza. In particular, the documentary visits Kibbutz Be'eri,
which looks a bit like present-day Gaza in parts, with a munitions
expert who demonstrates strong evidence that some of the houses had
been hit with IDF tank fire. It was Israeli troops, not Hamas
"murderers," according to one resident, who killed 12 longtime
residents there.
Also on the Al Jazeera documentary:
Alex de Waal: [03-21]
We are about to witness in Gaza the most intense famine since the second
world war: "Even when the numbers of people needlessly dying dwindle,
the scars of famine will endure."
Vivian Yee/Iyad Abuheweila/Abu Bakr Bashir/Ameera Harouda: [03-23]
Gaza's shadow death toll: Bodies buried beneath the rubble.
Israel vs. world opinion:
Michael Arria:
Ramzy Baroud: [03-22]
Cognitive dissonance: Perplexed US foreign policy is prolonging Gaza
genocide: "Perplexed" works on two levels here: they can't figure
out how to do things, because they're stuck in a lot of dysfunctional
ideas (like deterrence, sanctions, their great "indispensable nation"
conceit); but they also can't figure out what they want to do, partly
because Israel doesn't allow them any sensible options.
Daniel Boguslaw:
Biden decries civilian deaths in Gaza as Pentagon fails with its own
safeguards.
Peter Beinart: [03-22]
The great rupture in American Jewish life.
Jonathan Chait: [03-21]
Schumer is a better friend to Israel than Netanyahu's allies:
"Israelis have a right to know the dangers of Netanyahu's
one-statism."
Stan and Priti Gulati Cox: [03-19]
Blocking the aid trucks, letting the tanks roll.
Thomas L Friedman: [03-19]
What Schumer and Biden got right about Netanyahu: Like them,
Friedman's been so securely on the party bus for so long that he
feels entitled to weigh on on Israeli politics, if only to pretend
that something can be redeemed out of their descent into genocide.
Mostly, that means another attempt to rescue the "two-state" mirage.
As I've noted elsewhere, "two-state" is a card that Israel shows on
occasion when it seems convenient, but always withdraws, because
they're unwilling to allow anything like an independent state of
Palestinians. Or maybe they've just found it unnecessary, as long
as no one seriously twists their arms -- Americans have nominally
supported "two-state" since 1967, but never required more than a
bit of lip-service. They have at various points suggested they'd
agree to "two-state": they supported the 1937 and 1947 partition
plans, they agreed to UN resolutions in 1967 and 1973 which they
never followed up on, they agreed with Egypt in 1979 to "autonomy"
(a vague term with no timetable), they agreed to Oslo (with various
delays for "confidence building" that never happened, at least to
their satisfaction); all the while building more settlements
designed to establish "facts on the ground" making it impossible
to return land to any Palestinian state.
Friedman's six points here just show how maleable his mind is
to Israeli thinking. For instance, "Hamas's attack was designed to
halt Israel from becoming more embedded than ever in the Arab world
thanks to the Abraham Accords and the budding normalization process
with Saudi Arabia." So, the real reason a thousand Hamas fighters
undertook a suicide mission was to spoil Jared Kushner's kickback
scam? Gaza had been blockaded and was being choked to near-death,
especially since 2005, but Israelis can only imagine their own
existence at stake.
Mention "one-state," with its obvious implication of everyone
under that state enjoying equal rights, and Israelis will reject
the very idea as a "non-starter" -- as an idea they're unwilling
to even entertain, even though every real democracy takes pains
to protect minority individual rights from majoritarian abuse.
Liz Goodwin/Abigail Hauslohner/Yasmeen
Abutaleb/Leigh Ann Caldwell: [03-20]
Republicans hug Netanyahu tighter as Democratic tensions with Israel
war strategy boil: "The Israeli PM criticized Schumer's comments
calling for a new election as 'outrageous' in GOP-only meeting." The
meeting itself says volumes about those present: how arrogant and
careless Netanyahu is about entering into American party politics,
and how arrogant and careless Republicans are in usurping Biden's
foreign policy prerogatives. But my first reaction was simply,
"birds of a feather flock together" -- be they fascists, or merely
criminal-minded.
Michael Hirsh: [03-22]
From 'I love you' to 'asshole': How Joe gave up on Bibi.
Elie Quinlan Houghtaling:
In harrowing speech, AOC warns the US is aiding "genocide" in Gaza.
Gabriela Kaplan: [03-24]
'Not in my name': How a new generation is divesting from Israeli
apartheid.
Fred Kaplan: [03-18]
What Trump really means when he says he would end the war in Gaza
"quickly". Why write the article when you know the answer is
"nothing"? Trump spent his first term in thrall to his advisers
and donors/investors, and got nothing to show for it (aside from
his son-in-law pocketing $2B for his Abraham Accords scam). Ok,
one stroke of genius was scheduling the Afghanistan withdrawal to
occur on Biden's watch, as that was the exact point his approval
rates sunk under 50%. But that suggests Trump was smart enough
to lose 2020 on purpose, so Biden would get blamed for all of
the messes Trump left -- Afghanistan, Ukraine, and Gaza are the
loudest ones to date, but many more are still simmering -- so he
could rise again and claim a second term on his own far more
extremist terms. The main foreign policy change to expect from
Trump 2.0 is that he will provide a much more credible test of
Nixon's "madman theory."
Tariq Kenney-Shawa: [03-22]
Don't be fooled by Antony Blinken's crocodile tears: "The
secretary of state is very good at projecting empathy about the
horror in Gaza. But his actions speak much louder than his words."
Amed Khan:
Organizing aid to Gaza led me to a harsh truth: Biden is on board
for ethnic cleansing: "I helped with airlifts in Afghanistan,
aid to the Ukrainian front, and building roads in Rwanda. None of
it prepared me for the challenges of Gaza.
David Klion:
Hit dogs holler: What the backlash against Jonathan Glazer says
about Israel's defenders.
Mary Lawlor: [03-21]
There is no moral argument that justifies the sale of weapons to
Israel: "Israel has shown it will use these arms indiscriminately
against Palestinians."
Branko Marcetic: [03-23]
Israel's meddling in US politics is aggressive and unceasing.
Joseph Massad: [03-20]
In the West, Israel never reinitiates violence, it only 'retaliates':
Or so says Western media, especially the New York Times.
Jeff Melnick: [02-27]
A 'Black-Jewish alliance' in the US? Israel-Gaza war shows it's more
myth than special relationship.
James North: [03-23]
Mainstream media finally reports on Gaza famine but won't admit
Israel is deliberately responsible.
Trita Parsi: [03-22]
Why US ceasefire proposal failed at UNSC: "Russia and China
vetoed language which did represent a shift for Biden -- but the
devil is in the details."
Mitchell Plitnick: [03-23]
Chuck Schumer's speech widens rifts over Israel in Congress:
"Democrats are fracturing over support for Israel, because their
constituents don't support it. The long-term result might be the
end of the bipartisan consensus on Israel."
Ted Rall: [03-20]
Israel: Hermit kingdom: "Why is Israel rapidly sliding into
pariah status now?"
Michael Sappir:
The spiraling absurdity of Germany's pro-Israel fanaticism.
Karim Sariahmed: [03-19]
Doctors justify genocide in a prestigious journal: "The Journal
of the American Medical Association published four letters rife with
racist anti-Palestinian tropes. The prestigious platform created the
appearance of intellectualism and expertise, but it's all just racism
with a ribbon on it."
Norman Solomon: [03-24]
How Israel hides its atrocities in Gaza: "Apologists for Israel's
mass murder in Gaza fall back on 'antisemitism' claims."
Prem Thakker:
US doubles down on defunding UNRWA -- despite flimsy allegations.
Philip Weiss: [03-24]
Weekly Briefing: Zionism will never be viewed the same after the
Gaza genocide: "Jeffrey Goldberg used to brag of his Israeli
military service but this week was forced to withdraw from a
speaking event after students asked how a former IDF prison guard
could speak on democracy. Zionism has lost its hallowed perch in
U.S. society."
America's increasingly desperate and pathetic empire:
Sam Biddle:
Tech official pushing TikTok ban could reap windfall from US-China
cold war.
Connor Echols: [03-21]
'Not defendable': Top enlisted brass blast conditions for soldiers:
"The 'quality of life' for military and their families has become a
persistent problem, and its feeding into the recruitment crisis."
Jonathan Freedland: [03-22]
In defying Joe Biden, Benjamin Netanyahu is exposing the limits of US
power.
Daniel Larison: [03-22]
Hawks pushing for 'axis of evil' reunion tour: "Lumping US
adversaries into a single-headed monster is a paranoid delusion
used as to fuel militarism."
Alfred McCoy: [03-12]
The American Empire in (ultimate? crisis: "The decline and fall
of it all?" Sections, predictably, include: "Creeping disaster in
Ukraine"; "Crisis in Gaza"; and "Trouble in the Taiwan Straits."
Andrew O'Hehir: [03-04]
America in 2024: Blind, blundering Colossus on a downward slide:
"If the Biden-Trump rerun wasn't embarrassing enough, US support for
Israel has alienated the entire world."
Ishaan Tharoor: Washington Post's "Worldview" columnist.
These pieces could be scattered about, but fit together:
[03-19]
Israel's war on Hamas brings famine to Gaza: "What makes this
calamity all the more stunning is that it's entirely the product
of human decisions." Catherine Russell says, "we haven't seen that
rate of death among children in almost any other conflict in the
world." He also notes that "Israeli officials, chiefly Prime
Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, appear unmoved by the state of
affairs." Like it's exactly what they wanted.
[03-20]
How the war in Ukraine has split the Czechs and Slovaks.
[03-22]
Mexico rejects Texas's 'draconian' migrant law.
[03-25]
The US and Israel have a 'major credibility problem': Let's
quote some of this, about US Assistant Secretary of State Bill
Russo:
According to NPR, Russo said in his March 13 call that Israel --
and the United States, as Israel's security guarantor and close ally --
face a "major credibility problem" because of the war, the astonishing
Palestinian death toll (now more than 32,000 people),
the man-made famine gripping ravaged areas of the Gaza Strip,
and growing global frustration with Israel's insistence on prolonging
the war to fully eradicate militant group Hamas.
"The Israelis seemed oblivious to the fact that they are facing
major, possibly generational damage to their reputation not just in
the region but elsewhere in the world,"
the memo saida. "We are concerned that the Israelis are missing
the forest for the trees and are making a major strategic error in
writing off their reputation damage."
Alex Thurston: [03-21]
Why the Nigerien junta wants to kick US troops out: "While
Washington's policy has been rudderless since last year's coup,
an American exit might not be a bad thing." Also:
Election notes: After Super Tuesday, this is
turning into a category with not much happening, or at least not much
people are bothering to write against. March 19 saw presidential
primaries in Arizona, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, and Ohio. Biden's
been winning the Democratic side by a bit over 80%, which isn't
great for an incumbent, but also isn't disastrous. Trump wins as
easily, but rarely hits 80% -- also not great considering no one
is actively running against him. (In Arizona, the figures were
89.3% Biden, 78.8% Trump; in Florida, 81.2% Trump; in Illinois,
91.5% Biden, 80.6% Trump; in Kansas 83.8% Biden, 75.5% Trump;
in Ohio, 87.1% Biden, 79.2% Trump; in Louisiana, 86.1% Biden,
89.8% Trump. Missouri had a caucus, where Trump got 100% of 924
votes.
Paul Krugman: [03-21]
What's the matter with Ohio?
Nia Prater: [03-22]
The Republican Party is too embarrassing for George Santos:
So he's going to run as an independent in Nick LaLota's (R-NY)
House district. Most people run as independents because they
think they are, but the big advantage for Santos is that he can
keep his campaign finance scam going all the way to November,
instead of getting wiped out in the primary. So pretty much the
same reason Bob Menendez is running as an independent to keep
his Senate seat in New Jersey.
Trump, and other Republicans: Salon picks up some substantial
pieces, but they also do a lot of stuff that basically amounts to Trump
trolling. I usually skip past them, but this week they especially spoke
to me, so quite a few got crammed in here this week. I can also give
you some author indexes, in case you want to dig deeper (just scanning
the titles is often a hoot):
This week's links on all things Republican (the Trumpier the
better, but the real evil lies in the billionaire-funded think tanks):
Avram Anderson/Shealeigh Voitl: [03-22]
Heritage Foundation's blueprint for regression: "Project 2025
targets vulnerable communities, politicizes independent institutions,
and quashes dissent."
Gregg Barak: [03-23]
It's time to ignore Trump's trials: Criminal accountability is now
a distraction: "Please wake up sleeping America." It's a rather
messy argument, but until judgment came, the civil trials seemed
like a circus sideshow, but now he's scrambling for money. Barak
himself has a book coming out soon, which news will quickly render
obsolete:
Indicting the 45th President: Boss Trump, the GOP, and What We Can
Do About the Threat to American Democracy.
Jonathan Chait: [03-23]
The paramilitary candidate: "Trump has made justice for
insurrectionists the center of his campaign."
Jeremy Childs: [03-24]
Eric Trump says lenders he hit for half-billion dollars in father's
bond scramble 'were laughing'.
Nick Corasaniti/Maya King/Alexandra Berzon: [03-18]
The GOP flamethrower with a right-wing vision for North Carolina:
"Mark Robinson, the Republican nominee for governor, has a long
history of inflammatory statements. He has also called for weaving
conservative religious beliefs into the fabric of government."
Oliver Darcy: [03-22]
NBC hires former RNC chair Ronna McDaniel, who has demonized the
press and refused to acknowledge Biden was fairly elected. As
Norman Ornstein
tweeted: "At $300,000. Far more than experts, and honest analysts.
What an utter disgrace." Not the only blowback:
Igor Derysh:
Chauncey DeVega:
Kevin T Dugan: [03-21]
How screwed is Trump? "Unless he can find a way out of paying
Tish James, he will go bust on Monday."
Abdallah Fayyad: [03-19]
Trump is suddenly in need of a lot of cash. That's everyone's
problem. Why on earth is that? The US judicial system isn't
famed for treating convicts with the sort of kid gloves Trump
feels he's entitled to. Is this supposed to be some variation
on the joke: "if you owe thousands, that's your problem; if you
owe millions, that's the bank's problem"? Whatever happened to
"if you can't do the time, don't do the crime"? I might grant
that the system, in general, is biased against defendants, and
tends toward overly harsh judgments. But why should Trump, a
guy who seems incapable of remorse, and who has never shown any
sympathy for anyone else, be the exception? If anything, he's
a flagrant example of what the justice system is designed to
protect us against.
Henry A Giroux: [03-17]
Brecht's warning about the serpent's egg: Everyday Fascism:
"In a world shaped increasingly by emerging authoritarianism, it
has become increasingly difficult to remember what a purposeful
and substantive democracy looks like."
Rae Hodge: [01-29]
The Trump White House was hopped up on Air Force "go pills" because
of course it was.
Elie Honig: [03-22]
What are the odds Trump goes on trial before the election?
Brian Karem: [03-21]
We have met the enemy and he is us: "Trump is just a symptom. The
absurdity is everywhere." Links to:
Ed Kilgore:
Clare Malone: [03-25]
The face of Donald Trump's deceptively savvy media strategy:
"The former President and his spokesman, Steven Cheung, like to hurl
insults at their political rivals, but behind the scenes the campaign
has maintained a cozy relationship with much of the mainstream press."
Evidently, he's the one responsible for lines like "[DeSantis] shuffled
his feet and gingerly walked across the debate set like a 10 year old
girl who had just raided her mom's closet and discovered heels for the
first time" and "it's clear to see that Haley's campaign is just one
giant grift to either build her name ID for life after politics or to
audition for a cable news contributor contract."
Amanda Marcotte:
Lisa Mascaro/Mary Clare Jalonick/Jill Colvin:
[03-19]
Trump is making the Jan. 6 attack a cornerstone of his bid for the
White House.
David Masciotra: [03-16]
Ignorance and democracy: Capitalism's long war against higher education:
"My alma mater, and dozens of other colleges, are ditching the liberal
arts. That's a good way to kill off democracy." Sounds like a pretty
broad indictment, but first two words in article are "Donald Trump,"
and a pull quote cites advanced degree holders Ron DeSantis and Ted
Cruz. When I see names of some Harvard grads -- KS Attorney General
Kris Kobach is one, and as far as I can tell he's never written a law
that's been upheld as constitutional -- I'm reminded of the Randy
Newman lyric: "Good old boys from LSU, went in dumb, came out dumb
too."
This led me to a couple older articles:
Andrea Mazzarino: [03-21]
A dictatorship on day one? If America were a Trumpian autocracy.
Kelly McClure: [03-22]
Trump refers to AG Letitia James as having an "ugly mouth" and "low IQ"
in Truth Social rant.
Harold Meyerson: [03-21]
Republicans say it aloud: They want to raise the retirement age:
"The vast majority of House GOPniks tell Americans that if they want
Social Security, they need top work longer."
- Stephanie Mencimer: [03-25]
From laddie mag model to RNC co-chair: Lara Trump, nepo-spouse.
Dean Obeidallah: [03-22]
"He'll never leave": Why Trump's dynasty, built on corruption and violence, won't end with him: Interview with Ruth Ben-Ghiat, author of
Strongmen: Mussolini to the Present.
Heather Digby Parton:
Christian Paz: [03-21]
3 theories for why Donald Trump's popularity is rising: None are
very convincing:
- Trump is benefiting from economic nostalgia
- Trump is recovering from a remarkably low moment
- Trump is benefiting from a quieter campaign, muted coverage, and
a tuned-out public
You might as well say it's because many people are forgetful,
gullible, ill-tempered and flat-out stupid, because that's what
Trump's campaign -- which, by the way, has not been very quiet
or muted, no matter how many have tried to tune it out -- caters
to. I think this also reflects two problems that Biden has: he
represents the status quo, which in the end will probably save
him, but for now it's mostly marked by increasing inequality and
precarity, even through relatively decent economic stats; also,
Biden's still in the phase where he's mostly campaigning for the
donors -- and he's raising more money, even before you deduct the
fines and legal costs Trump is racking up. That focus will shift
with the DNC in August, when they start spending their war chest
on actually wooing voters they've thus far taken for granted.
Sam Russek:
The mattress tycoon funding the far right in Texas: Jim McIngvale.
Greg Sargent:
Trump's latest rage-rant reveals a major political weakness.
- Deirdre Shesgreen: [03-18]
'Gross misjudgment': Experts say Trump's decision to disband pandemic
team hindered coronavirus response.
Matt Stieb:
Kirk Swearingen: [03-24]
Who brought the crime, the drugs and the rape? It was him: "Trump's
infamous 2015 speech claimed immigrants were 'bringing crime' and were
'rapists.' Talk about projection."
Prem Thakker:
House Republicans want to ban universal free school lunches.
Lucian K Truscott IV: [03-19]
Trump blows the MAGA whistle -- and his signal is heard loud and
clear.
Andra Watkins:
[03-19]
Decoding Project 2025's Christian nationalist language:
"Evangelicalese allows Trump's MAGA supporters to hide their extreme
positions in plain sight." Note: She also has a Substack called
How Project 2025 Will Ruin YOUR Life. Previously wrote:
[03-01]
Project 2025 is more than a playbook for Trumpism, it's the Christian
Nationalist manifesto: "The right intends to force every American
to live their definition of a good life through government edict."
Li Zhou: [03-20]
How the threat of a government shutdown became normalized.
Biden and/or the Democrats:
Perry Bacon Jr: [03-19]
Voters of color are shifting right. Are Democrats doomed?
Hannah Story Brown: [03-25]
Tim Ryan's natural gas advocacy makes a mockery of public service:
Ex-Representative (D-OH), ran for Senate and lost, now "leveraging his
prior career for a group backed by fossil fuel and petrochemical players."
Why do you suppose he couldn't convince voters he'd serve them better
than a Republican?
Gail C Christopher: [03-22]
Stop ageism: A call for action: "It's one of the last socially
acceptable forms of prejudice, and it needs to come to an end in
society and this presidential campaign." Really, you think this is
going to work? Or even help? Believe me, I know it happens, often
in cases where it is inappropriate, but unlike many prejudices,
there is also something substantive at root here, and finding the
right combination of respect and care and understanding in each
distinct case is going to take some work, and not just a bumper
sticker slogan.
Ryan Cooper: [03-11]
Democrats need a party publication: "The New York Times is
not going to get Biden's campaign message before voters." Pull
quote: "There is a giant right-wing propaganda apparatus blasting
Republican messaging into tens of millions of homes every day,
which Democrats do not have." Also: "You could do quite a lot of
journalism for a tiny, tiny fraction of what the Democrats are
going to spend on the 2024 campaign." I figured the line about
the New York Times was some kind of joke, but here's the unfunny
part:
A recent speech from New York Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger makes
clear that he -- perhaps unsurprisingly for a scion of multigenerational
inherited wealth -- is proud of his paper's ludicrously anti-Biden slant
and virulent transphobia, and will keep doing it. If it's up to him,
this campaign will center around Biden's age, while Trump's numerous
extreme scandals and outright criminality -- as well as his own advanced
age and dissolving brain -- will be carefully downplayed. If I were Biden
and the Democrats, who implicitly elevate the Times as their counterpoint
to Fox, I'd be looking to change that, and quick.
James Downie: [03-23]
House Republicans just gave Biden the biggest possible gift: "When
it comes to Social Security and Medicare, Republicans just can't help
themselves." I could have filed this under Republicans, but didn't
want this piece to get lost among this week's Trump scuzziness. Trump
is a problem, but he's merely cosmetic compared to the deep Republican
mindset, which remains set on destroying the institutions that at least
minimally protect us from the most predatory practices of capitalism,
supposedly in favor of an entrepreneurial utopia. I was pointed to
this piece by an Astra Taylor tweet (link just vanished), possibly
because the piece itself cites her The Age of Insecurity.
Robert Kuttner:
[03-18]
Man of steel: "President Biden's blockage of the proposed purchase
of US Steel by Japan's Nippon Steel is unprecedented and magnificently
pro-union."
[03-22]
The promise of Biden's second term: "And the exemplary effects of
his green jobs creation programs in his first term."
Legal matters and other crimes:
Climate and environment:
Stephen Lezak: [03-22]
Scientists just gave humanity an overdue reality check. The world
will be better for it. This follows on [03-20]
Geologists make it official: we're not in an 'anthropocene' epoch.
For geologists, it's a fairly technical question, and given the ways
geologists think about time, I'm not surprised that they don't see
need for another division. The Holocene only starts with the retreat
of the Wisconsin Ice Age -- the fifth major glacial advance of the
Pleistocene, itself an arguably premature designation. (The factors
that drove ice ages during the period have are presumably still in
place -- certainly the continents haven't moved much, nor has the
earth orbit changed, or solar output -- but the atmosphere has been
altered enough to make renascent glaciation very unlikely.) Humans
started leaving their mark on the Earth's surface as the
Holocene
started some 11,700 years ago, so the whole epoch could have been
named the Anthropocene. Perhaps that seemed presumptuous when first
named, and maybe even now, but using 1952 as an convenient dividing
line is simply arbitrary.
Delaney Nolan:
The EPA is backing down from environmental justice cases nationwide.
Cassady Rosenblum: [03-23]
Blocking Burning Man and vandalizing Van Gogh: Climate activists are
done playing nice: This is indicative of what happens with those
in power deny, dissemble, and ultimately fail at problems that have
become overwhelmingly obvious. Those in power should see protests --
orderly of course, but also disruptive and destructive -- as symptoms
of underlying issues that require their attention.
But most often,
they think they can get away with suppressing protests, which by
aggravating the protesters while ignoring the problems only makes
future protests more desperate, and dangerous. As noted here,
"something desperate and defiant is stirring in the climate
movement." Signs of escalating tactics are as easily measured
as the increasing ppm of greenhouse gases. The tipping points
of catastrophic inflections are harder to guess, but their odds
are approaching inevitable, as we have observed stressed humans
do many times before, in many comparable situations.
David Wallace-Wells: [03-20]
When we see the climate more clearly, what will we do? There
is not a satellite designed to locate methane leeks.
Business/economic matters:
Ukraine War:
Blaise Malley: [03-22]
Diplomacy Watch: Middle powers offer unique 'congrats' to Putin:
"Leaders in Turkey, India, use post-election phone calls to offer
support in future negotiations."
New York Times: [03-23]
Death toll rises to 133 in Moscow concert hall attack: US
sources were quick to blame this on ISIS, and to deny Ukrainian
involvement (although Zelensky couldn't resist a "told you so").
PS:
Simon Jenkins: [03-22]
Putin is a dictator and a tyrant, but other forces also sustain him --
and the west needs to understand them: "Kneejerk criticism of
regimes in Russia, China or India may make us feel better, but there's
no evidence it is making the world a safer place."
Joshua Keating: [03-22]
Why the Pentagon wants to build thousands of easily replaceable,
AI-enabled drones: "Ukraine's drone innovations have changed
how the US is planning for a war with China."
Jack Hunter: [03-20]
Lindsey Graham wants to force more Ukrainian men into the draft:
"The war-hawking senator said 'we need more people in the line.' But
'we' doesn't mean 'he.'"
Pjotr Sauer: [03-22]
Over 1m Ukrainians without power after major Russian assault on
energy system: "Kyiv says the country's largest dam and hydroelectric
plant were hit as Moscow unleashed 88 missiles and 63 drones." For more,
see their
Ukraine war briefing, which also reminds us of the peril facing
the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant."
Ted Snider: [03-20]
How many Westerners are fighting in Ukraine? "There may be more
foreign boots on the ground -- troops and mercenaries -- than you
think."
Simon Tisdall: [03-16]
How will the Ukraine war end? Only when Vladimir Putin is toppled.
This extremely stupid piece was written while Russia's election was
happening, which we now know gave Putin six more years with 87% of the
vote. He raises the usual alarms about "white flags" and "capitulation,"
castigates Putin as a "messianic mass murderer," and conjures up a new
domino theory, assuming that any sign of weakness would only encourage
Russia to attack and swallow more territories. Still, there's little
reason to believe that Putin could do those things if he wanted to,
which is far from certain. The war is stalemated, but neither side can
afford to give up, nor is likely to (and clearly, Russia is no more
likely to than the US, where Putin's patsy is leading in the polls --
but still 10 months away from becoming president). And despite all
his bluster, even Tisdall admits that a "middle way" -- basically a
Korea-type ceasefire where "near-term priorities need to shift from
attempting to liberate more territory to defending and repairing
the more than 80% of the country still under [Ukraine's] control."
I'd submit that an even better deal would be possible -- maybe not
on territory, but you'd get more security by allowing economic ties
to return to normalcy. One should recall that the parts of Ukraine
that Russia was able to seize, especially in 2014 but also extras
in 2022, were mostly ethnic Russian, and acted as a pro-Russian
bloc inside Ukraine. Giving them up makes the rest of Ukraine more
pro-western, which is what the US/EU wanted in the first place. I'd
call that a win -- and one which Putin wouldn't have to think of as
a loss.
Robert Wright: [03-22]
Special cold war freak-out issue: "China and Russia and Cuba --
oh my!" First section is on TikTok, if you're interested, but I want
to point you to the second, on how the Wall Street Journal (Yaroslav
Trofimov) tries to twist around things that Putin says to suggest
negotiating with him is impossible. Further down there's a section on
the "Havana Syndrome" freak out, plus his concerns over AI -- which
is more the subject of his [03-15]
Meta's dangerously carefree AI chief. I'm rather skeptical of his
alarm over Open Source in AI -- my position has always been that the
real threat is the business model, and Open Source usually tempers
that sort of problem (but doesn't preclude it, as Google has amply
demonstrated). I'm an admirer but unpaid subscriber, so I haven't
listened to his podcasts, but
What does Putin want? could be helpful, especially to the
aforementioned WSJ reporter.
Around the world:
Connor Echols: [03-20]
US 'prepared to deploy troops to Haiti if necessary. If Biden
goes along with this, I dare say it would be political suicide. For
Trump, as for most US presidents going back to Thomas Jefferson,
Haiti is the quintessential "shithole country." Right-thinking
Americans would bristle at the idea of doing anything to help
there. Realistic Americans would realize that the US military is
not capable of helping, and that its entrance would make matters
worse. The left should be pushing back against Biden's warmaking
on all fronts. And nobody wants another costly quagmire.
Sam Knight: [03-25]
What have fourteen years of Conservative rule done to Britain?
"Living standards have fallen. The country is exhausted by constant
drama. But the UK can't move on from the Tories without facing up
tot he damage that has occurred."
Robert Kuttner: [03-13]
WTO, RIP: "The annual World Trade Organization meeting came
to an ignominious end last week with no 'progress' on major issues.
That is a form of progress."
Emily Tamkin:
Slovakia's presidential election is a warning to America:
"What to see what the United States would look like under a reelected
Trump?"
Other stories:
Laura Bult: [03-21]
Why it's so hard for Americans to retire: "There's a reason so
many of us don't have enough retirement savings." Video piece, but
links to Teresa Ghilarducci's book,
Work, Retire, Repeat: The Uncertainty of Retirement in the New Economy.
Probably good, but Astra Taylor covers the key point in her
The Age of Insecurity: Coming Together as Things Fall Apart.
Stephanie Burt:
Lucy Sante and the solitude and solidarity of transitioning:
"In her new memoir, I Heard Her Call My Name, Sante dissects
her past in order to understand her future."
David Dayen: [01-29]
America is not a democracy. Long piece from the print magazine.
Seems like I should have noticed it before. Too much to get into
just now.
Sarah Jones:
The exvangelicals searching for political change. Self-evident
neologism is from the book reviewed herein, The Exvangelicals:
Loving, Living, and Leaving the White Evangelical Church, by
Sarah McCammon. Related here:
Carlene Bauer: [03-12]
She trusted God and science. They both failed her. Review of
Devout: A Memoir of Doubt, by Anna Gazmarian, "an author
who grew up in the evangelical church recounts her struggle to
find spiritual and psychological well-being after a mental health
challenge."
Rich Juzwiak: [03-12]
A biography of a feminist porn pioneer bares all: "In Candida
Royalle and the Sexual Revolution, the historian Jane Kamensky
presents a raw personal -- and cultural -- history." Another review:
Keren Landman: [03-20]
Abortion influences everything: "By inhibiting drug development,
economic growth, and military recruitment, as well as driving doctors
away from the places they're needed most, bans almost certainly harm
you -- yes, you."
Katie Moore: [03-17]
When Kansas police kill people, the public often can't see bodycam
footage. Here's why.
Marcus J Moore: [03-21]
The visions of Alice Coltrane: "In the years after her husband
John's death, the harpist discovered a sound all her own, a jazz
rooted in acts of spirit and will." I'll say something about this
in Music Week. Meanwhile:
Rick Perlstein: [03-20]
'Stay strapped or get clapped': "How the media misses the story
of companies seeking profit by keeping traumatized veterans armed
and enraged."
Andrew Prokop: [03-21]
The political battle over Laken Riley's murder, explained:
Riley was a 22-year-old student in Georgia who was murdered,
allegedly by an "illegal immigrant," an event seized upon by
right-wing agitators, like the guy who tweeted: "If only people
went to the streets to demand change in the name of Laken Riley,
like they did for George Floyd." Article provides more details.
While the murders as isolated events were equivalent, the policy
considerations are very different, starting with responsibility
for enabling the killers, and regarding the more general context.
One not even mentioned here is the effect of the sanctions and
isolation policy toward Venezuela -- mostly but not exclusively
Trump's work -- and how that has driven many, including Riley's
alleged killer, to migrate to the US. Prokop: "But reality is
also more complicated than Trump's promises that he'll fix
everything by getting tougher once he's president."
Brian Resnick: [03-22]
The total solar eclipse is returning to the United States --
better than before: "This will be the last total solar eclipse
over the contiguous United States for 21 years." I find myself
with zero interest in looking up, much less traveling to do so,
but family and friends in Arkansas are lobbying for visitors,
and I know some people who are going. April 8 is the date.
Dylan Scott: [03-22]
Kate Middleton's cancer diagnosis is part of a frightening global
trend: "More and more young people are getting cancer." I have
zero interest in her, or in any of "those ridiculous people" (John
Oliver's apt turn of phrase), and so I've ignored dozens of pieces
on them recently, but there's something more going on here. Every
category of cancer they used is more common among ages 14-49 than
it was in 1990. My wife swears it's environmental, and while I can
think of statistical variations, I'm inclined to agree.
Jeffrey St Clair: [03-22]
Roaming Charges: L'état sans merci. "Willie Pye is dead and
Georgia is back in the execution business." This introduces a
long section on what passes for justice in America. Much more,
of course. For more on Pye, see:
Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins: [03-20]
The problematic past, present, and future of inequality studies:
Interview with Branko Milanovic, whose lates book is Visions of
Inequality: From the French Revolution to the End of the Cold War.
Dodai Stewart: [03-16]
You're not being gaslit, says a new book. (Or are you?) Review
of Kate Abramson: On Gaslighting. Demands precision of a
phenomenon that is deliberately imprecise ("all kinds of interactions --
lying, guilt-tripping, manipulation"; "a multi-dimensional horror
show"). Cites Harry G Frankfurt's On Bullshit (2005) as a
"spiritual forebear."
Astra Taylor/Leah Hunt-Hendrix: [03-21]
The one idea that could save American democracy: Tied to the
authors' new book,
Solidarity: The Past, Present, and Future of a World-Changing
Idea. Also:
By the way, I just found a link to audio for
Astra Taylor: [2023-11-17]
The Age of Insecurity: 2023 CBC Massey Lectures, with five
hour-long lectures corresponding to the book I just read, and
recommend as highly as possible -- I'd go so far as to say that
she's the smartest person writing on the left these days. I was
pointed to the lectures by a daanis
tweet: "I finally listened to
@astradisastra
Massey Lectures on my way to Boston, just mainlined them one
after another straight into my brain, and added her language
about precarity and insecurity into my own remarks about
surviving together by becoming kin."
Maureen Tkacik: [03-11]
'Return what you stole and be a man with dignity': "Doctors
didn't think it was possible to loathe the world's biggest health
care profiter any more. Then came the hack that set half their
bookkeeping systems on fire." About the ransomware outage at
Change Healthcare, which is owned by UnitedHealth ("the nation's
fifth-largest company").
Bryan Walsh: [03-22]
Baseball superstar Shohei Ohtani has been caught up in a gambling
controversy. He won't be the last. One of the biggest changes in
my lifetime has been the changed attitude toward gambling, which
in my mother's day was a degenerative sin indulged by lowlifes,
much to the profit of mobsters. Today the mobsters have turned
into Republican billionaires -- hard to say whether that's a step
up or down ethically -- and their rackets have moved out into the
open. For a long time, the shame of the Black Sox kept the lid on
sports gambling, but that's been totally blown open in the recent
years. I hate it, which doesn't mean I want to try to ban it, but
those involved are no better than criminals, and should be reminded
of it as often as possible.
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Tuesday, March 19, 2024
Music Week
March archive
(in progress).
Music: Current count 42007 [41974] rated (+33), 28 [27] unrated (+1).
Just a day late, although it feels like longer, and feels like it
should have been longer still. I did manage to wrap up a small essay
that's been hanging over my head for weeks -- or at least I'm hoping,
as a final sign off would be nice. This pushed
Speaking of Which back a day, which I didn't mind.
While I've
occasionally threatened to kill it, the process of scanning my news
sources, plucking out what strikes me as important and/or interesting,
and occasionally commenting -- sometimes taking off on a tangent of
personal/philosophical interest, sometimes just to heckle -- has been
giving me a strange sense of comfort in what are clearly discomforting
times.
Besides, this week the writing project I most seriously considered
killing was Music Week. As to why, you're free to dig into the notebook,
but what you'll find there is rather sketchily one-sided, with very
little of what I really think, let alone why. Nor is there more than
a hint of how much pain and anger I've felt this week. In my experience,
such emotions do no good, although for better or worse -- sure, mostly
the latter -- they are a big part of who I am, and how I came to be
this way.
You also can simply ignore most of that paragraph, and just accept
what I have to say in this one. Music Week changed this week, and may
be changed for good, although I rather doubt it. Midweek I stopped
reviewing new music, so everything in this week's "New records"
section was done by Wednesday last. I don't plan on resuming any
time soon, although that's no guarantee I won't have a few next
week, and the odds of at least some appearing increase over time.
In particular, it's inevitable that at some point I'll return to
my promo queue, and when I do play something, I'll probably write
it up in my logs, because, well, that's what I do.
Indeed, I started on that this week. After several days of playing
my kind of comfort food, I decided I wanted to hear some Art Pepper.
But instead of pulling out an old favorite -- of which there are dozens,
including any random disc in The Complete Galaxy Recordings --
I remembered a 7-CD box that came out last year, that I thought I could
stream. I put it off, mostly due to the length, but I figured I had
time now, and was looking to fill it up. Unfortunately, while the title
is listed (The Complete Maiden Voyage Recordings, what's actually
available is a 4-CD release from 2017, which I couldn't find a label
for. But I did find an Unreleased Art volume I hadn't heard,
and that got me looking around. And as I did play them, I wound up
doing what I always do.
I trust there are no surprises in the "Old music" section this week.
Four A/A- records are ones I previously had graded that high in other
forms. Getz's Nobody Else but Me is an old standby from one of
the primo shelves, and I was surprised I only had it listed at B+, so
an upgrade was clearly in order. The Jaki Byard is a bootleg that Allen
Lowe raved about. I found it when I was trying to clear up some tabs,
and decided I might as well play it, and write it up.
I moved from Getz
to Geller by proximity. He's long fascinated me, so seemed worth the
dive. Playing him now as I write, so next Music Week will at least
have him. His late period seems to produce consistently fine but less
than spectacular records.
Indexing
February still delayed,
as is damn near everything else in my life.
By the way, Kansas's first presidential primary in ages was today.
We braved a line of absolutely no one to vote for Marianne Williamson
in the Democratic primary. I gave up my Independent status in 2008 to
caucus for Obama (against Clinton), and again in 2016 for Sanders
(again, against Clinton), both of whom won big in Kansas. Williamson
didn't win:
current returns (91.9% in) give her 3.4% to Biden's 83.9%,
with 10.2% "none of the names shown." Still, anyone who wants to
create a Department of Peace gets my vote over Biden's war machine.
Trump is leading Haley 75.3% to 16.1%, with 5.2% for "none of
the names shown." Trump had lost the
2016 caucus to Cruz.
PS: Oops! Was thinking about this most of the week,
then slipped my mind when I initially posted. Meant to mention
that the rated count ticked over another thousand mark this week,
now over 42,000.
New records reviewed this week:
Lynne Arriale Trio: Being Human (2023 [2024],
Challenge): Pianist, originally from Milwaukee, 17th album going
back to 1994, mostly trios, this one with Alon Near (bass) and
Lukasz Zyta (drums).
B+(**) [cd]
Blue Moods: Swing & Soul (2023 [2024], Posi-Tone):
Second album, "celebrating Duke Pearson," for label regulars Diego
Rivera (tenor sax), Art Hirahara (piano), Boris Kozlov (bass), and
Vinnie Sperrazza (drums), with Jon Davis taking over piano on two
tracks. Very upbeat, joyous even.
B+(***) [sp]
Gerald Cannon: Live at Dizzy's Club: The Music of Elvin
& McCoy (2023 [2024], Woodneck): Bassist, mainstream,
several albums under his name since 2000, more side-credits back
to 1989, including 75th Birthday Celebration with Elvin
Jones, a couple with McCoy Tyner, and most of the stars he lined
up for this set of two Jones pieces, five Tyners, and one original:
Eddie Henderson (trumpet), Sherman Irby (alto sax), Joe Lovano
(tenor sax), Steve Turre (trombone), Dave Kikoski (piano), Lenny
White (drums).
B+(***) [sp]
The Chick Corea Elektric Band: The Future Is Now
(2016-18 [2023], Candid, 2CD): Fusion group, originally formed
in 1986, active for a decade after that, with a similar Elektric
Band II appearing for a 1993 album, and an outlier album in 2004.
This was collected from five concerts, August 2016 to May 2018.
Lineup: Corea (piano/keyboards), Frank Gambale (guitar), John
Patitucci (bass), Dave Weckl (drums), Erik Marienthal (sax) --
all in the band as of 1987.
B+(*) [sp]
Patrick Cornelius: Book of Secrets (2022 [2023],
Posi-Tone): Alto saxophonist, from San Antonio, based in New York,
ten or so albums since 2006. Also plays soprano, alto flute, and
clarinet here (on two tracks with Diego Rivera guesting on tenor
sax). Backed by Art Hirahara (piano), Peter Slavov (bass), Vinnie
Sperrazza (drums), and Behn Gillece (vibes).
B+(**) [sp]
Stephan Crump: Slow Water (2023 [2024], Papillon
Sounds): American bassist, debut 1997, many albums since, as well
as sidework (especially with Vijay Iyer). [Major failing that he
does not yet have a Wikipedia page.] Chamber jazz move, thick
with slowly moving strings, occasional flashes of brass. Refers to
a recent book by Erica Gies: Water Always Wins: Thriving in an
Age of Drought and Deluge.
B+(***) [cd] [05-03]
Art Hirahara: Echo Canyon (2023, Posi-Tone):
Pianist, based in New York, side credits back to 1995, but emerged
as a leader in 2011 and, especially with this trio of Boris Kozlov
(bass) and Rudy Royston (drums) has become his label's default
rhythm section.
B+(**) [sp]
Mannequin Pussy: I Got Heaven (2024, Epitaph):
Post-punk band from Philadelphia, Missy Dabice the singer, fourth
album since 2014, harder than I care for, but do mix it up a bit.
B+(**) [sp]
Pissed Jeans: Half Divorced (2024, Sub Pop):
Another post-punk band with some critical acclaim. Sixth album
since 2005.
B+(*) [sp]
Diego Rivera: With Just a Word (2022 [2024],
Posi-Tone): Tenor saxophonist, Mexican-American family, born
in Ann Arbor, director of jazz studies at Texas (Austin),
sixth album as leader since 2013, plus side projects like
Blue Moods. Latin-tinged mainstream quintet here with Pete
Rodriguez (trumpet), Art Hirahara (piano), Luques Curtis
(bass), and Rudy Royston (drums).
B+(***) [sp]
Jeremy Rose & the Earshift Orchestra: Discordia
(2023 [2024], Earshift Music): Composer, plays soprano sax and bass
clarinet, leading a conventional 17-piece big band and drummer Chloe
Kim. Theme: "the paradoxes of our information era" and "the dangerous
implications of misinformation," exacerbated by AI.
B+(***) [cd]
Bill Ryder-Jones: Iechyd Da (2024, Domino):
English singer-songwriter, co-founded the Coral, seventh album
since going solo in 2011, first one I've checked out, mostly
because it's currently [03-12] the top-rated 2024 album at AOTY
(88/16 reviews, but mostly from UK sources). He's not much good
as a singer, but is touchingly vulnerable, and gets help from
lush orchestrations and a kiddie choir, which somehow turns in
miracles. Nearest similar example I can think of someone I wound
up liking despite hardly liking anything about him is Sufjan
Stevens. Ryder-Jones seems even more improbable.
A- [sp]
Nadine Shah: Filthy Underneath (2024, EMI North):
British singer-songwriter, from Whitburn, lives in Newcastle, father
Pakistani, fifth album since 2013.
B+(*) [sp]
Sheer Mag: Playing Favorites (2024, Third Man):
Postpunk band from Philadelphia, Tina Halladay the singer, third
album, after EPs in 2015-16 and albums in 2017 and 2019.
B+(**) [sp]
Rafael Toral: Spectral Evolution (2024, Moikai):
Portuguese guitarist, mostly works in electronics, quite a few
albums since 1994, some (like Space Quartet) more obviously
connected to jazz. This is solo, starts with guitar which is soon
heavily overlaid.
B+(*) [sp]
Hein Westergaard/Katt Hernandez/Raymond Strid: The Knapsack,
the Hat, and the Horn (2022 [2024], Gotta Let It Out):
Guitar-violin-drums trio from Sweden. A little sketchy.
B+(**) [cd]
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries:
None
Old music:
Jaki Byard: Live in Chicago 1992 (1992, Jazz³+):
Pianist (1922-99), started with Charlie Mariano in 1950, later
with Maynard Ferguson and Charles Mingus, his own albums from
1960 on. This is solo, from Chicago Jazz Festival, 45:58, doesn't
seem to have a proper release so is some kind of bootleg. At one
point he manages to blow some sax while playing along.
B+(**) [yt]
Herb Geller: European Rebirth: 1962 Paris Sessions
(1962 [2022], Fresh Sound): Alto saxophonist (1928-2013), from
Los Angeles, recorded some fine albums 1954-58, but after his
wife Lorraine died of an asthma attack in 1958, he left the US,
played bossa nova in Brazil, then on to Europe, only really
getting back into recording around 1984. Fifteen tracks from
various Paris sessions, plus two bonus tracks from festivals.
B+(***) [sp]
Herb Geller: Plays the Al Cohn Songbook (1994
[1996], Hep): The alto saxophonist plays twelve songs Cohn wrote,
plus one original and one standard. With Tom Ranier (piano, tenor
sax, clarinet, bass clarinet), John Leitham (bass), and Paul
Kreibich (drums), plus a couple of vocals by Ruth Price.
B+(**) [r]
Herb Geller: To Benny & Johnny, With Love From Herb
Geller (2001 [2002], Hep): Benny Carter and Johnny Hodges,
two of the alto saxophonist's heroes and models as he started his
own career -- Charlie Parker is often cited as a third, but at
this late date, he seems to be more in the mood for easy swing.
With Hod O'Brien (piano), Chuck Berghofer (bass), and Paul Kreibich
(drums).
B+(**) [r]
Herb Geller: Plays the Arthur Schwartz Songbook
(2005, Hep): Fourteen songs plus a medley, all co-credits with
lyricists irrelevant here (Howard Dietz, Frank Loesser, Leo Robin,
E.Y. Harburg). Alto or soprano sax, backed with piano (John Pearce),
bass (Len Skeat), and drums (Bobby Worth).
B+(**) [r]
Stan Getz/Charlie Byrd: Jazz Samba (1962, Verve):
The first of a series of immensely popular albums that reflected
and contributed to what was then called "the bossa nova craze."
I know this music from a later 4-CD compilation: The Girl From
Ipanema: The Bossa Nova Years (1989, following a 5-LP edition
in 1984). Getz was well established, having started as a bebopper,
deftly maneuvering through the "West Coast Cool Jazz" scene, and
grasping other opportunities -- his 1961 album Focus was
the first "sax with strings" album where the strings were every
bit as interesting as the sax. He had developed as a fine ballad
player -- and would continue to grow up to his final act, 1991's
duos with Kenny Barron, People Time. Byrd takes the lead
here in laying out the rhythms, which Getz rides so gracefully.
Getz followed this with a big band album, a minor misstep, then
recruited Luiz Bonfa for Encore, Laurinda Almeida, then
João Gilberto for the best album of the series, which made the
latter's wife, singer Astrud Gilberto, a star.
A- [sp]
Stan Getz With Al Haig: Preservation (1948-51
[1967], Prestige): A compilation of Getz's earliest 78s, all
with Haig on piano, his name below the title but set off from
the others: Kai Winding, Jimmy Raney, Tommy Potter, Gene Ramey,
Roy Haynes, Stan Levey, Blossom Dearie and Jr. Parker. Title,
from a song here, reflects the influence of Lester Young,
especially the light tone. A dozen songs, three vocals of
varying interest -- I'd rather hear more of Getz, but I'm
not going to complain about Haig's solos.
B+(**) [sp]
Art Pepper & Warne Marsh: Unreleased Art: Volume 9:
At Donte's, April 26, 1974 (1974 [2016], Widow's Taste,
3CD): Alto saxophonist, spent most of the years 1954-65 in prison,
produced some brilliant albums when he was briefly free, especially
the run from Modern Art (1957) to Smack Up (1960),
but he has little to show for the period from 1965 until 1975,
when he recorded Living Legend, kicking off a staggering
series of albums and live performances up to his death, at 56,
in 1982. In 2007, his widow, Laurie Pepper, started releasing
old tapes, with ten (often multi-CD) volumes through 2018. This
is the only one I missed, unusual both in that it's from just
before his big comeback, and also that it pairs him with another
leader, tenor saxophonist Warne Marsh. They were backed by Mark
Levine (piano), John Heard (bass), and Lew Malin (drums). Some
terrific playing here, especially toward the end. Harder to get
a real handle on Marsh here. Pepper makes the point that they
hadn't seen, much less played with, each other in 17 years.
B+(***) [r]
Art Pepper: Surf Ride (1952-53 [1957], Savoy):
Possibly his first LP, compiled from three dates, two with three
tracks, the last with six. Different groups on each, with Russ
Freeman, Hampton Hawes, and Claude Williamson the pianists, and
Jack Montrose (tenor sax) added on the backstretch. Exceptionally
lively, ten originals plus a Lester Young and "The Way You Look
Tonight," with Montrose joining the race when he could. Not quite
everything Pepper recorded for Savoy, so any compilation -- one
I've long recommended is Straight Life: The Savoy Sessions
(1984) -- is likely to be redundant.
[NB: The 2-CD The Complete Surf Ride, which appeared in
Japan in 1987, has four more songs and 25 extra takes, inline,
so it's likely to be too redundant.]
A- [sp]
Art Pepper Quintet: Live at Donte's 1968 (1968
[2004], Fresh Sound, 2CD): Digging around, I found this rare item
from Pepper's missing decade (1965-75), recorded in North Hollywood,
with Joe Romano (tenor sax), Frank Strazzeri (piano), Chuck Berghofer
(bass), and Nick Ceroli (drums). Only six songs, but four of them
top 19:37, and the others 13:35 and 10:07 ("incomplete"). Basically
the formula he would use for the rest of his life, at least after
losing the extra sax.
B+(***) [r]
Art Pepper/Warne Marsh: Art Pepper With Warne Marsh
(1956 [1986], Contemporary/OJC): This is where they met previously,
both West Coast saxophonists, alto and tenor, Pepper a scrappy
be-bopper out of the Stan Kenton band, Marsh a serious protégé
of the more idiosyncratic Lennie Tristano (as was Lee Konitz, who
often played with Marsh). With Ronnie Ball (piano), Ben Tucker
(bass), and Gary Frommer (drums), the CD adding extra takes of
three (of seven) pieces. Everyone here has a feather-light touch,
so that even "Stompin' at the Savoy" seems to float.
[NB: Some of this was released as The Way It Was! in 1972.]
A- [r]
Art Pepper: No Limit (1977 [1978], Contemporary):
Studio album, quartet with George Cables (piano), Tony Dumas (bass),
and Carl Burnett (drums), covers "Ballad of the Sad Young Men,"
plus three originals: two for his wife, the last a mambo. The
latter adds a second horn, a tenor sax, dubbed in by Pepper, and
quite wonderful.
A- [sp]
Art Pepper: Saturday Night at the Village Vanguard
(1977 [1992], Contemporary/OJC): After being blown away with the
Thursday and Friday Night sets, I sprang for the
whole 9-CD The Complete Village Vanguard Sessions box,
and never looked back. But three tracks here were released on
vinyl in 1977, and a fourth added (52:00 total) for the 1992
CD. This was his all-star group, with George Cables (piano),
George Mraz (bass), and Elvin Jones (drums). Two standards,
two original I've heard many times and never tire of.
A- [r]
Art Pepper: More for Les: At the Village Vanguard, Volume
Four (1977 [1992], Contemporary/OJC): As the box proved, there
was a lot more great music after extracting the Thursday,
Friday, and Saturday Night LPs, so they cobbled
a fourth volume together in 1985, and expanded it some for the
CD. In the intro, Pepper gushes that he's never before appeared
with players of this caliber (George Cables, George Mraz, Elvin
Jones), which is not quite true (see Meets the Rhythm Section),
but he plays like it is, because they play like they are. Title
song is an original. The standards are equally his: I've heard
him play them many times, rarely (if ever) better than here.
A [sp]
Sonny Redd/Art Pepper: Two Altos (1952-57
[1992], Savoy): Pepper you know. The other alto saxophonist
here is Sylvester Kyner Jr. (1932-81), from Detroit, started
with Barry Harris, mostly played in hard bop groups, got his
debut (sort of) here, recorded five albums 1959-62 (dropping
the extra d, so just Sonny Red), only one
more after that. This was slapped together from four sessions,
different personnel for each (drummer Larry Bunker is on two).
No alto duets either: Pepper leads on four tracks, Redd on
the other two. Nice enough. Front cover puts Pepper first,
but spine has Redd, and he needs the credits more. This came
out on LP in 1959 on Regent, as Redd's career was taking off,
and Pepper was headed back to the slammer.
B+(*) [sp]
Sonny Red: Out of the Blue (1959-60 [1996],
Blue Note): Alto saxophonist, formerly Redd, first and only album
for Blue Note, originally eight tracks with Wynton Kelly, six from
1959 with Sam Jones and Roy Brooks, plus two from 1960 with Kelly,
Paul Chambers, and Jimmy Cobb, the CD tacking on five more from
the latter session. A very solid outing, not least for the bonus
tracks.
B+(***) [sp]
Limited Sampling: Records I played parts of, but not enough
to grade: -- means no interest, - not bad but not a prospect,
+ some chance, ++ likely prospect.
Stephan Crump/Steve Lehman: Kaleidoscope and Collage
(2011, Intakt): Bass and alto sax duo, both with previous connections
to Vijay Iyer, although none that I see with each other.
[1/2 tracks, 16:40/39:02]
- [r]
Grade (or other) changes:
Stan Getz: Nobody Else but Me (1964 [1994], Verve):
At the time, Getz's samba albums were selling so well they didn't
bother releasing this quartet session, which aside from the infusion
of Gary Burton's vibes sounds much in line with his early bebop
efforts. Mostly standards, starting with a memorable "Summertime,"
but also including two Burton originals. With Gene Cherico (bass)
and Joe Hunt (drums).
[was: B+] A- [cd]
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Martin Budde: Back Burner (Origin) [03-22]
- Four + Six: Four + Six (Jazz Hang) [03-29]
- Romy Glod/Christian Ramond/Klaus Kugel: No Toxic (Nemu) [01-02]
- Johnny Griffin: Live at Ronnie Scott's (1964, Gearbox)
- Jazz Ensemble of Memphis: Playing in the Yard (Memphis International) [04-05]
- Last Day Quintet: Falling to Earth (Origin) [03-22]
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Monday, March 18, 2024
Speaking of Which
Well, another week, with a few minor variations, but mostly the
same old stories:
Israel is continuing its genocidal war on Gaza, with well
over 30,000 direct kills, the destruction of most housing and
infrastructure, and the imposition of mass starvation. This war
is likely to escalate significantly next week, as Netanyahu has
vowed to invade Rafah, which has until now been a relatively safe
haven for over one million refugees from northern parts of the
Gaza strip. Israel is also orchestrating increased violence in
the occupied West Bank and along the Lebanon border, which risks
drawing the US into the conflict (as has already happened in the
Red Sea).
The United States remains supportive of and complicit in
Israeli genocide, although we're beginning to see signs that the
Biden administration is uncomfortable with such extremism. Public
opinion favor an immediate cease-fire, which Israel and its fan
club have been working frantically to dispel and deny.
Meanwhile, the war in Ukraine continues to be stalemated,
with increasingly desperate and dangerous drone attacks. Putin
is up for reelection this weekend, and is expected to win easily,
against token opposition that also supports Russia's war, so any
hopes for regime change there are very slim. On the other hand,
the war is becoming increasingly unpopular in the US, where thus
far Biden has been unable to pass his latest arms aid request. The
only way out of this destructive and debilitating war is to open
negotiations, where the obvious solution is some formalization of
the status quo, but thus far Biden and Zelensky have refused to
consider the need.
Biden's has secured the Democratic nomination for a second
term, but he remains deeply unpopular, due to gross Republican
slanders, his own peculiar personal weaknesses, and legitimate
worry over wars he has shown little concern and/or competency at
ending.
Meanwhile, Trump has secured the Republican nomination,
but is mostly distracted by the numerous civil and criminal cases
he has blundered into. He's lost two civil cases, bringing fines
of over $500 million, but he has thus far managed to postpone trial
in the four criminal cases, and he had several minor victories on
that front last week. Meanwhile, the Republican Party is remaking
itself in his image, defending crime and corruption, spreading
hate, and aspiring to dictatorship. (At some point, I should go
into more depth on how, while the Democrats remain pretty inept
at defending democracy, the Republicans have gone way out of their
way to impress on us what the destruction of democracy has in store
for us.)
Due to various factors I don't want to go into, I got a late
start on this, and lost essentially all of Saturday, so I expect
the final Sunday wrap-up to be even more haphazard than usual.
Sorry I didn't mention this earlier, but we were saddened to
hear of the recent death of
Jim Lynch. He was one of the Wichita area's most steadfast
peace supporters, and he will be missed.
Except, of course, that I didn't manage to wrap up on Sunday,
so this picks up an extra day -- not thoroughly researched, but
I am including some Monday pieces.
Initial count: 183 links, 9,145 words.
Top story threads:
Israel:
Mondoweiss:
[03-11]
Day 157: As Ramadan begins, Israel obstructs Palestinian entry to
al-Aqsa Mosque: "Israel is preparing itself and its prisons for
the arrest of thousands of Palestinians, Netanyahu says. Meanwhile,
Israel has already begun obstructing access to the Al-Aqsa mosque
in Jerusalem, attacking worshipers on the first night of Ramadan."
[03-12]
Day 158: Israel airstrikes continue to pummel Gaza during the holy
month of Ramadan: "Israeli forces bombed Gaza on the first day
of Ramadan, killing two fishermen. Israel's fortified highway has
reached the Mediterranean coast, effectively splitting Gaza in two.
Meanwhile, hundreds of settlers stormed the al-Aqsa Mosque compound."
[03-13]
Day 159: Netanyahu vows to invade Rafah: "Benjamin Netanyahu
says Israel "will finish the job in Rafah" despite growing international
concern over an invasion, including from the U.S. Meanwhile, Israeli
forces kill 5 Palestinians in the West Bank in the last 24 hours,
including 3 children."
[03-14]
Day 160: Israel kills 7 Palestinians waiting for aid, attacks UN
distribution center: "Israel's Knesset approved a $19.4 billion
budget increase to fund the ongoing Israeli genocide, while the Biden
administration has indicated that it will greenlight the targeting of
'high-value Hamas targets in and underneath Rafah.'"
[03-15]
Day 161: Hamas proposes new prisoner exchange deal, Netanyahu's office
calls it 'unrealistic': "Thousands of Palestinian worshippers have
been denied access to pray at al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem for Ramadan's
first Friday prayers, while Israeli forces have committed another
massacre against Palestinian aid-seekers in Gaza City."
[03-16]
Day 162: Israel kills 36 Palestinians in strike on Gaza home as
Netanyahu approves Rafah invasion: "An Israeli strike on a home
in Nuseirat refugee camp kills 36 people as massacres continue across
Gaza. Meanwhile, Israel approves plans for Rafah ground invasion
despite warnings it will be 'catastrophic' for over 1.4 million
Palestinians."
[03-17]
Day 163: Top EU official says Israel failed to prove its accusations
against UNRWA: "Netanyahu has vowed to invade Rafah despite the
international red line. Meanwhile, the U.S. has sanctioned two illegal
settler outposts in the West Bank for the first time."
[03-18]
Day 164: Israeli army storms al-Shifa again, aid reaches Jabalia for
first time in months: "Over a million people in Gaza face 'imminent'
famine as UNRWA aid trucks arrive in northern Gaza for the first time
in months. Meanwhile, the Israeli army's Chief of Staff says 'a long
way to go' until Israel's military objectives are achieved."
AlJazeera: [03-18]
Famine expected in Gaza between now and May: What to know? "A
UN-backed report says the entire Gaza population is experiencing
a food shortage as Israel is accused of provoking famine."
Ruwaida Kamal Amer/Ibtisam Mahdi: [03-14]
With no safety in Rafah, Palestinians are fleeing back to Gaza's
decimated center.
Hédi Attia: [03-11]
Gaza & the legacy of Netanyahu's 'war on terror': "What
happened on Oct. 7 represents the collapse of an erroneous doctrine
the Israeli leader has consistently promoted throughout his career."
One thing I clearly remember from watching TV on Sept. 11, 2001, as
the World Trade Center was burning and collapsing, was Netanyahu's
shit-eating grin as he was boasting about how good the attacks were
for Israel, because now Americans will finally know what terrorism
feels like. (Shimon Peres took the same line, perhaps a bit more
soberly, as did John Major, who pointed out that Britain has more
experience than anyone with "chickens coming home to roost" -- not
his words, but most famously from Malcolm X.) Most people reacted
to 9/11 and 10/7 with shock and horror. Netanyahu saw them as
confirmation of his life's work, and a signal to move on to his
Final Solution.
Samer Badawi: [03-16]
'Armchair humanitarianism': The problem with Gaza's maritime aid
corridor.
Simon Speakman Cordall/Veronica Pedrosa: [03-13]
Not just the UNRWA report; Countless accounts of Israeli torture in
Gaza.
Tareq S Hajjaj: [03-13]
Palestinians in Gaza face famine during Ramadan.
Shereen Hindawi-Wyatt: [03-14]
What Israeli soldiers' display of Palestinian women's lingerie reveals
about the Zionist psyche.
Najia Houssari: [03-16]
Israel accused of 'scorched earth' tactics in southern Lebanon.
David Kattenburg: [03-11]
UN expert: Israel is engineering famine in Gaza: Cites UN Special
Rapporteur Michael Fakhri, who says: "We've never seen a civilian
population made to go hungry so completely and so quickly." Also:
"It's not just denying humanitarian aid. It's not just shooting at
civilians trying to get humanitarian aid; It's not just bombarding
convoys of humanitarian trucks, even though those humanitarian trucks
are coordinating with them. They're destroying the food system." Chris
Gunness adds: "This is not a natural disaster. This is a political
choice which our governments are taking, and people of conscience all
around the world need to tell their governments, tell their elected
representatives, that they do not want to be complicit in genocide
and starvation."
Rami G Khouri: [03-18]
Watching the watchdogs: Piers, airdrops, and mediagenic spectacles
in Gaza.
Elisha Ben Kimon: [03-11]
IDF Gaza Division commander reprimanded for blowing up Gaza
university: Brigadier General Barak Hiram.
Middle East Monitor: [03-18]
Israeli settlers vandalise UNRWA's Jerusalem headquarters, threaten
staff.
Mahmoud Mushtaha: [03-16]
'We scream, starve, and die alone': Life in the ruins of Shuja'iya:
"Israel's month-long invasion of the Gaza City neighborhood left
behind a trail of devastation. Still under siege, its Palestinian
residents are risking death to get their hands on a bag of flour."
Adam Rasgon/Vivian Yee/Gaya Gupta/David Segal: [03-17]
'We're not a banana republic,' Netanyahu says, rejecting criticism
from US: Sounds like he's working on his post-political,
post-prison career, in stand-up.
Shira Rubin/Yasmeen Abutaleb: [03-14]
Israel faces crisis of its own making as chaos and hunger engulf
Gaza.
Ronen Tal: [03-17]
'Israeli settlers can now do whatever they please. They want to
drive off those who live there': "Eella Dunayevsky, an Israeli
activist in the West Bank for decades, has lost hope that the
conflict can be solved. Her new book details countless incidents
of harassment and violence in the South Hebron Hills."
David Zenlea: [03-09]
This Israeli minister wants a full-on religious war. His proposals
for Ramadan risked starting one. "Itamar Ben-Gvir has been
sidelined for now. But his fulminations still deserve our undivided
attention."
Israel vs. Biden: Israelis like to talk about the "multi-front
war" they're besieged with, but for all the talk of Iranian proxies, they
rarely point out that their main struggle since Oct. 7 has been with world
opinion, especially as it became obvious that they had both the intent
and means to commit genocide. For a long time, Biden and virtually the
entire American political establishment were completely subservient to
Israeli dictates, but that seems to be shifting slightly -- maybe those
taunts of "Genocide Joe" are registering? -- so much so that Israel can
add the US to its array of threats. Not a done deal, but increasingly
a subject of discussion.
Daniel Boguslaw:
FBI warns Gaza War will stoke domestic radicalization "for years to
come".
Connor Echols: [03-13]
Bombs, guns, treasure: What Israel wants, the US gives.
Liz Goodwin: [03-14]
Schumer calls for 'new election' in Israel in scathing speech on
Netanyahu: I'd be among the first to point out that's none of his
business, just as it's none of Netanyahu's business to weigh in on
American elections -- as he's done both personally and through donors
like the Abelsons and lobbying groups like AIPAC. On the other hand,
if Schumer wanted to cut off military aid and diplomatic support for
genocide, that would clearly be his right. More on Schumer:
Jonathan Chait: [03-16]
Why Chuck Schumer's Israel speech marks a turning point: "He
tried to escape the cycle of violence and hate between one-staters
of the left and right." That's a very peculiar turn of phrase --
one designed to depict "two-staters" as innocent peace-seekers who
have been pushed aside by extremists, each intent on dominating
the other. But the very idea of "two states" was a British colonial
construct, designed initially to divide-and-rule (as the British
did everywhere they gained power), and when they inevitably failed,
to foment civil wars in their wake. (Ireland and India/Pakistan are
the other prime examples, although there are many others.) The
"two-state solution" isn't some long deferred dream. It is the
generator and actual state of the conflict. Sure, it doesn't look
like the "two states" of American propaganda -- a fantasy Israelis
sometimes give lip-service to but more often subvert -- due to the
extreme asymmetry of power between the highly efficient and brutal
Israeli state and the emaciated chaos of Palestinian leadership
(to which the PA is mere window dressing, as was much earlier the
British-appointed "Mufti of Jerusalem"). The only left solution
is a state built on equal rights of all who live there.
Borders
may be abitrary, and one could designate one, two, or N states in
the region, with various ethnic mixes, but for the left, and for
peace and justice, each must offer equal rights to its inhabitants.
It is true that some on the left were willing to entertain the
two-state prospect, but that was only because we realized that
Israel is dead set against equal rights, and saw their security
requiring that most Palestinians be excluded. We expected that
a Palestinian majority, left to its own devices, would organize
a state of equal rights democratically. Meanwhile, an Israel more
secure in its Jewish majority might moderate, as indeed Israel
had done before the 1967 war, the revival of military rule, the
settler movement, the debasement and destruction of the Labor
Party, and the extreme right-wing drive of the Netanyahu regimes.
That the actually-existing Zionist state has become an embarrassment
to someone as devoted to Israel as Schumer may indeed be a turning
point. But heaping scorn on "left one-staters" while trying to revive
the "two-state solution," with its implied "separate but equal" air
on top of vast differences in power, is less a step forward than a
desperate attempt to salvage the past.
EJ Dionne Jr: [03-16]
Schumer said out loud what many of Israel's friends are thinking.
Murtaza Hussain:
Outrage at Chuck Schumer's speech: The pro-Israel right wants to
eat its cake too.
Fred Kaplan: [03-14]
Why Chuck Schumer's break with Netanyahu seems like a turning point
in the US relationship with Israel.
Halie Soifer: [03-15]
Schumer spoke for the majority of American Jews: "Only 31% of
American Jewish voters have a favorable view of the Israeli prime
minister."
Caitlin Johnstone: [03-15]
If Israel wants to be an 'independent nation,' let it be: "Israel
knows it's fully dependent on the US and cannot sustain its nonstop
violence without the backing of the US war machine."
Fred Kaplan: [03-15]
There's a cease-fire deal on the table. Hamas is the one rejecting
it. Israel doesn't need to negotiate
with Hamas for a cease-fire. They can do that by themselves. You say
that wouldn't get the hostages back? Someone else -- say whoever
wants to run food and supplies into Gaza? -- can deal with that.
The hostages are relatively useless just to swap for other hostages.
Their real value to Hamas is to the extent they inhibit Israel from
the final, absolute destruction of Gaza and everyone stuck there.
Admittedly, that hasn't worked out so well, but trading them for
time only helps if the international community uses that time to
get Israel to give up on their Final Solution. Meanwhile, what
Israel likes about negotiating with Hamas is they never have to
agree to anything, because the one thing Hamas wants is off the
table. And because Israel is very skilled at shifting blame to
Hamas. They even have Kaplan fooled. I mean, consider this:
Netanyahu has rejected these conditions as "delusional." On this
point, he is right. A complete withdrawal of troops and a committed
end to the war would leave Israel without the means to enforce the
release of hostages. It would also allow Hamas to rebuild its military
and resume attacking Israel, whether with rocket fire or another
attempted incursion.
But isn't the point of negotiation to get both sides to do what
they committed. Why does Israel need a residual force to "enforce
the release of hostages"? If Hamas failed to honor its side of the
deal, Israel could always attack again. Can't we admit that would
be a sufficiently credible Plan B? And how the hell is Hamas going
"to rebuild its military and resume attacking Israel"? They never
had a real military, and Gaza never had the resources and tech to
build serious arms, and what little they did have has been almost
completely demolished. I could see Hamas worrying that Israel could
use truce time to bulk up so they could hit Gaza even harder, but
the opposite isn't even projection; it's just plain ridiculous.
Joshua Keating: [03-14]
How Biden could dial up the pressure on Israel -- if he really wanted
to.
Mitchell Plitnick: [03-15]
It isn't Netanyahu who is acting against the will of his people, it's
Biden.
Richard Silverstein:
Adam Taylor/Shira Rubin: [03-14]
Biden administration imposes first sanctions on West Bank settler
outposts.
Kelley Beaucar Vlahos:
Philip Weiss: [03-17]
Weekly Briefing: Now everyone hates Israel: "The unbelievable
onslaught on a captive people in Gaza has at last cracked the
conscience of the American Jewish community and sent American
Zionists into complete crisis." Picture of Schumer, followed by
Jonathan Glazer at the Oscars.
Israel vs. world opinion:
Feminist Solidarity Network for Palestine: [03-11]
Here's what Pramila Patten's UN report on Oct 7 sexual violence
actually said: "The UN report on sexual violence on October 7 has
found no evidence of systematic rape by Hamas or any other Palestinian
group, despite widespread media reporting to the contrary. But there
are deeper problems with the report's credibility."
Luke Goldstein: [03-14]
AIPAC talking points revealed: "Documents show that the powerful
lobby is spreading its influence on Capitol Hill by calling for
unconditional military aid to Israel and hyping up threats from
Iran."
David Hearst: [03-14]
All signs point to a strategic defeat for Israel.
Kathy Kelly: [03-15]
When starvation is a weapon, the harvest is shame.
Tariq Kenney-Shawa: [03-14]
Israel Partisans' use of disinformation.
Jonathan Ofir: [03-12]
Human rights groups sue Denmark for weapons export to Israel.
Roy Peled: [03-08]
Judith Butler is intentionally giving Hamas' terror legitimacy:
"In recent comments, the American Jewish gender theorist labeled the
Oct. 7 attack as 'armed resistance.'" This is where I entered a cluster
of related articles:
There's an element of talking past each other here, and especially
of assuming X implies Y when it quite possibly doesn't. "Armed
resistance" is not in inaccurate description of what Hamas is doing
in Gaza. Especially when they're firing back at invading IDF soldiers,
one could even say that they're engaged in "self defense" (to borrow
a term that Israelis claim as exclusively theirs). The left has some
history of celebrating "armed resistance," but that's mostly from
times and places where no better option presented itself. But the
struggle for equal rights (which is the very definition of what the
left is about) has a natural preference for democracy, nudged on by
occasional nonviolent civil resistance -- a realization that has
been encouraged by occasional success, but also by the insight that
some acts of violence are self-damaging and self-defeating.
Oct. 7 is certainly an example of this. I think it's safe to say
that most people who supported equal rights for Palestinians have
condemned the Oct. 7 attackers, most often as immoral but also as
bad political strategy. Why Hamas chose to launch that particular
attack can be explained in various ways -- and please don't jump to
the conclusion, which seems to be ordained in the Hasbara Handbook,
that explaining = justifying = supporting = celebrating. The most
likely is that Hamas felt that no other option was open, perhaps
by long observation of other Palestinians pleading and protesting
non-violently, only to find Israelis more recalcitrant than ever.
Or one might argue that Hamas aren't a left group at all, but like
the Zionists are dominating and reducing their enemies, and as such
are enamored with violence, like the right-wing fascists of yore.
Or you could imagine a conspiracy, where Hamas and Netanyahu have
some kind of bizarre symbiotic relationship, where each uses the
other as a wedge against their near enemies. (Even without an
actual conspiracy, that does describe much of the dynamic.)
Still, there is another way of looking at "armed resistance,"
which is that it is the inevitable result of armed occupation,
oppression, and repression -- something which Israel is uniquely
responsible for. And because it's inevitable, it doesn't matter
who is doing it, nor does it do any good to chastise them. The
only way to end resistance is to end the occupation that causes
it. So while we shouldn't celebrate armed resistance, we also
shouldn't flinch from recognizing it as such, because we have
to in order to clearly see the force it is resisting.
Andrew Perez/Nikki McCann Ramirez: [03-14]
Israel lobby pushes lie that people are not starving in Gaza.
Reuters: [03-17]
UE's Von Der Leyen says Gaza facing famine, ceasefire needed
rapidly.
America's increasingly desperate and pathetic empire:
Election notes:
Trump, and other Republicans:
Maggie Astor:
Aaron Blake:
Jamelle Bouie: [03-16]
Kellyanne Conway has some weak advice for her party.
Chris Cameron: [03-18]
Trump says Jews who support Democrats 'hate Israel' and 'their
religion'.
Zak Cheney-Rice: [03-09]
The normalization of Trump's alleged crimes: "His legal strategy
is both buying him time and erasing the accusations against him."
Noted last week, but worth noting again.
Chas Danner: [03-17]
Why did Trump warn of postelection 'bloodbath' if he loses?
Chauncey DeVega: [03-15]
Trump sneakers and the MAGA uniform: Merchandising fascism to the
mainstream. This led me to a couple more pieces worth mentioning
here:
Igor Derysh: [03-13]
Departure "blindsides" Boebert and GOP: Ken Buck (R-CO) already
decided not to run for reelection in 2024, which may be attributed
to not wanting to face primary flak after transgressing against
Trump and his cadres -- even though, until recently, Buck had been
firmly perched on the far-right wing of the party. But his decision
last week to resign his seat and force an interrim election shows
his pique with a more obvious target: Boebert, who facing an uphill
campaign in her own district, which she just barely won in 2022,
decided to switch to Buck's more heavily Republican district for
2024. Close reading suggests it's not quite a knockout blow, but
makes her campaign a good deal more awkward.
Tim Dickinson: [03-14]
Trump campaign ads are monetizing pro-Nazi content on Rumble.
Angelo Fichera: [03-16]
Examining Trump's alternate reality pitch: "The war in Ukraine.
Hamas's attack on Israel. Inflation. The former president has insisted
that none would have occurred if he had remained in office after
2020."
Jessica M Goldstein:
The right-wing war on abortion has nothing to do with babies:
"This is a battle over body autonomy." I can't imagine who thinks
that's a winning political slogan, or what the rationale is. Same
for "bans off our bodies," per the signs in the pic, although that
at least suggests that the war on abortion has something in common
with rape. The war -- and I think you have to grant that it's being
waged like one, with babies (both symbolically and literally) as
pawns and hostages, with callous indifference to casualties (or
sometimes giddy delight), and with a vast fog of propaganda -- is
really just an assault on freedom, and not just on women. Just look
at everything else the people waging this war are also working on.
Rebecca Gordon: [03-14]
Trump showed us who he is the first time around: "Trump 2.0 would
be even worse."
Ed Kilgore:
Eric Levitz: [03-12]
Trump just opened the door to Social Security cuts. Take him seriously.
Eric Lipton/Maggie Haberman/Jonathan Swan: [03-17]
Kushner deal in Serbia follows earlier interest by Trump.
Alexander Nazaryan: [03-14]
Trump's cabinet of horrors: "Team Trump is doing something this
time around that it didn't think to do in 2016: It's planning. And
wait until you see what those plans include." Author wrote a 2019 book
on Trump's first-term cabinet, The Best People: Trump's Cabinet
and the Siege on Washington, but looks like he figured he could
get an early jump on the sequel.
Toni Aguilar Rosenthal: [03-15]
Ken Paxton, America First Legal, and premonitions of Project 2025:
"Texas today is what America will look like if Trump wins. It's not
pretty."
Jim Rutenberg/Steven Lee Myers: [03-17]
How Trump's allies are winning the war over disinformation:
"Their claims of censorship have successfully stymied the effort
to filter election lies online."
Greg Sargent:
Matt Stieb: [03-18]
Trump says he can't find a $464 million bond. Now what?
"Trump's lawyers want some leniency from the appeals court as
Attorney General Letitia James gears up to possibly seize assets
as early as next week."
Lucian K Truscott IV: [03-12]
The pure emptiness of Katie Britt.
Biden and/or the Democrats:
Legal matters and other crimes:
Kim Bellware: [03-14]
Father of Oxford shooter found guilty of involuntary manslaughter:
James Crumbley, whose son killed four students with guns and ammo
provided by his parents. The mother, Jennifer Crumbley, was also
convicted of involuntary manslaughter in an earlier trial.
Ben Brasch: [03-14]
Police fatally shoot autistic 15-year-old who charged with garden tool,
video shows.
Margaret Carlson: [03-16]
Take a load off Fani: "A judge's ridiculous probe of Fulton County
Prosecutor Fani Willis ends with a split decision and another Trump
legal delay."
Ryan Cooper: [03-05]
The corrupt Supreme Court bails out Trump once more: Another
comment on the Colorado 14th Amendment case.
Elie Honig: [03-15]
The failure of DOJ's special counsel system. And he barely mentions
Kenneth Starr, who's still the obvious prime suspect.
Sarah Jones: [03-15]
The Christian right's imaginary nation: Filed here because it
starts with the lawsuit to ban mifepristone, but the topic is much
broader.
Ruth Marcus: [03-18]
Outlawing abortion is just the start for some conservative
judges.
Ian Millhiser:
Adam Rawnsley/Asawin Suebsaeng: [03-05]
The Supreme Court is tilting 2024 in Trump's favor, one decision at a
time.
Mark Joseph Stern:
Even the Supreme Court's conservatives are fed up with the garbage
coming out of the 5th circuit.
Matt Stieb: [03-14]
Not only will Bob Menendez refuse to quit, he might run as an
independent: Filed here because he's a criminal, and his claim
as a Democrat is long gone. But clearly he understand the graft
advantages of running for office, and he's no doubt studying Trump
on how to use a pending election to snag up the wheels of justice.
Climate and environment:
Rebecca Burns: [03-12]
Against the wind: "Climate science deniers, right-wing think tanks,
and fossil fuel shills are plotting to foil the renewable-energy
revolution."
Keren Landman: [03-13]
4 big questions about measles, answered.
Aaron Regunberg/David Arkush:
The case for prosecuting fossil fuel companies for homicide: "They
knew what would happen. They kept selling fossil fuels and misleading
the public anyway." The title overreaches, probably just to get your
attention, as I doubt anyone wants to blur the definition of homicide
that much. As a practical matter, the case against gun companies is
much more substantial, with many fewer mitigating factors, and look
how far that's gotten. But prosecuting them for something? There may
well be a case for that.
Brian Resnick: [03-13]
Are we breaking the Atlantic Ocean? "The climate change scenario
that could chill parts of the world, explained."
Dylan Scott: [03-14]
The tropical disease that's suddenly everywhere: Dengue fever.
Economic matters:
War in Ukraine, an election in Russia:
Connor Echols: [03-15]
Diplomacy Watch: The pope is (mostly) right about Ukraine: "It
does Kyiv no favors to pretend that this war is going well."
Medea Benjamin/Nicholas JS Davies: [03-13]
After Nuland, the chances for peace in Ukraine.
Giorgio Cafiero: [03-18]
If Kyiv fell, would Moldova have been next? I'd caution that "domino
theories" are usually false alarms, but the continued existence of a
separatist Transnistria, like Abkhazia and South Ossetia (formerly
parts of Georgia), as well as similar fragments of Yugoslavia, will
remain as potential trouble spots that can blow up into major wars --
like Donbas. I blame the US and Russia both for for failing to try
to find workable compromises, and maybe also less interested parties
(like Turkey and the EU) that risk being sucked into disasters.
Robyn Dixon: [03-14]
Why does Putin always win? What to know about Russia's pseudo
election.
Marc Martorell Junyent: [03-18]
A chat with the devil beats a lifetime in hell: "In a new book,
Pierre Hazan gives an insider's account of the importance of peace
talks." The book is:
Negotiating with the Devil: Inside the World of Armed Conflict
Mediation. The book deals with many examples beyond Ukraine.
Branko Marcetic: [03-15]
Does Putin want to end the war? We should test him: "Ukraine war
maximalists are portraying diplomacy as futile, pointing to a cherry
picked quote from a recent interview with the Russian president."
Ishaan Tharoor: [03-18]
Russia's farce election sums up a grim moment in global democracy.
Anton Troianovski/Nanna Heitmann: [03-17]
With new six-year term, Putin cements hold on Russian leadership.
Looks like he won, the term extending to 2030, with 87% of the
vote. "Western governments were quick to condemn the election as
undemocratic."
Around the world:
Boeing:
TikTok: A bill to force, under threat of being banned, the
Chinese owners of TikTok to sell the company has passed the House,
with substantial bipartisan support. Despite the many links here,
I have no personal interest in the issue, although I do worry about
gratuitous China-bashing, and I'm not a big fan of any social media
companies or their business models.
Jonathan Chait: [03-14]
Explain to me why China has to control TikTok: "If it's just a
great app, why can't somebody else run it?" Explain to me why China
can't? That they might tilt the scales on political discourse shouldn't
be a problem if political information is freely accessible elsewhere --
unless the point is specifically to suppress anything that might offer
a specifically Chinese perspective on the news? And it's not as if
companies owned by Americans, Brits, Israelis, or Rupert Murdoch don't
tilt their own platforms to further their own national or personal
interests. I'm not a fan of foreign capital coming to America and
buying up real estate and companies and so forth, but then I'm not
often a fan of the Americans who sell out their country, often to
take their profits to buy up someone else's, then lobby for foreign
policies that put the sanctity of their property ahead of peace and
cooperation. I also doubt this would be happening unless there are
financiers waiting in the wings to make a killing on the sale, as
well as the arms lobbyists, who jump on any opportunity to increase
tension with China, Russia, or anyone else who can be sold as some
kind of threat.
David French: [03-17]
What Trump's TikTok flip-flop tells America: "On yet another
confrontation between American national security and an authoritarian
foreign adversary, Biden sides with American interests and Trump
aligns with our foe." French somehow imagines that complaint, along
with his Reagan conservative cred, will get him invited to parties
in DC. But that Trump seems able to get away with such apostasy
testifies to how low the credibility of the Blob has sunk.
Minho Kim: [03-17]
Khanna explains opposition to TikTok bill while Senators signal
openness: Ro Khanna [D-CA] was one of 50 Democrats ("mostly
from the progressive wing") and 15 Republicans who voted against
the House bill.
Ken Klippenstein: [03-16]
TikTok threat is purely hypothetical, US intelligence admits.
Taylor Lorenz: [03-16]
The TikTok debate featured many disputed claims. Here are 7 of them.
Arwa Mahdawi: [03-16]
Are progressive politics the real reason why US lawmakers are spooked
by Tiktok? "Some users think the app has become a hub for
progressive activism."
Nicole Narea: [03-14]
TikTok could avoid a ban with a sale. Finding a buyer won't be easy.
"Former Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin is among those lining up to
buy TikTok if Congress enacts a law that forces its Chinese owner to
sell."
AW Ohlheiser: [03-14]
Banning TikTok would be both ineffective and harmful.
Nathan J Robinson: [03-14]
The plan to ban TikTok is outright xenophobia.
Michael Tracey: [03-15]
The frenzy to ban TikTok is another National Security State scam.
Other stories:
Andrea Long Chu: [03-11]
Freedom of sex: The moral case for letting trans kids change their
bodies. I'm in no mood to wade into this issue, but note the
article, which makes an honest and serious point, and backs it up
with considerable evidence and thought. Also note the response:
Jonathan Chait: [03-16]
Freedom of sex: A liberal response. Oh great, another epithet:
TARL (trans-agnostic reactionary liberal), which Chait seizes on,
probably because he's the very model of a "reactionary liberal" --
a term he's encountered in many other contexts, and not undeservedly
(need we mention Iraq again?).
TJ Coles: [03-08]
The new atheism at 20: How an intellectual movement exploited
rationalism to promote war: The Sam Harris book, The End
of Faith, came out in 2004, soon to be grouped with Daniel
Dennett (Breaking the Spell), Richard Dawkins (The God
Delusion), and Christopher Hitchens (God Is Not Great).
While critical of all religions, they held a particular animus for
Islam, at a time when doing so was most useful for promoting the
American and Israeli wars on terror. Coles has a whole book on
them: The New Atheism Hoax: Exposing the Politics of Dawkins,
Dennett, Harris, and Hitchens. Coles is a British psychologist
with a lot of recent books attacking media domination by special
interests; e.g.:
- President Trump, Inc.: How Big Business and Neoliberalism Empower Populism and the Far-Right (2017)
- Real Fake News: Techniques of Propaganda and Deception-Based Mind Control, From Ancient Babylon to Internet Algorithms (2018)
- Manufacturing Terrorism: When Governments Use Fear to Justify Foreign Wars and Control Society (2019)
- Privatized Planet: Free Trade as a Weapon Against Democracy, Healthcare and the Environment (2019)
- The War on You (2020)
- We'll Tell You What to Think: Wikipedia, Propaganda and the Making of Liberal Consensus (2021)
- Biofascism: The Tech-Pharma Complex and the End of Democracy (2022)
- Militarizing Cancel Culture: How Censorship and Deplatforming Became a Weapon of the US Empire (2023)
Matt Kennard: [03-16]
Last days of Julilan Assange in the United States: "The WikiLeaks
publisher may soon be on the way to the US to face trial for revealing
war crimes. What he would face there is terrifying beyond words."
Rick Perlstein: [03-13]
Social distortion: "On the fourth anniversary of the pandemic, a
look at how America pulled apart as the rest of the world pulled
together." Reviews Eric Klinenberg: 2020: One City, Seven People,
and the Year That Changed Everything.
Scott Remer: [03-15]
Pessimism of the intellect, pessimism of the will: Title is an
obvious play on Gramsci, who even facing death in prison preferred
"optimism of the will." But no mention of Gramsci here. The subject
is self-proclaimed progressivism, keyed to this quote from Robert
LaFollette: "the Progressive Movement is the only political medium
in our country today which can provide government in the interests
of all classes of the people. We are unalterably opposed to any
class government, whether it be the existing dictatorship of the
plutocracy or the dictatorship of the proletariat." (Presumably
that was from 1924, when the Soviet Union was newly established.)
That leads to this:
All this should sound familiar. It describes bien-pensant
liberals of the Obama-Clinton-Biden persuasion to a tee: their
aestheticization of politics, their fetishization of
entrepreneurialism and expertise; their studied avoidance of
polarization, partisanship, and partiality; their distaste for class
conflict; their elevation of technocracy and science as beacons of
reason; their belief in the pretense that politics can be reduced to
interest-group bargaining and consensus seeking; their desire to keep
the labor movement at a distance; their continued fealty to American
exceptionalism even when looking to European models would be
exceptionally edifying; and their general attitude of deference
towards big business. Neoliberals' demography -- disproportionately
white, upper middle class, professional, and college-educated --
also parallels the original Progressives.
I like bien-pensant here, as it's open to translations
ranging from "right-thinking" to "lackadaisically blissful,"
each a facet of the general mental construct. The easiest way
to understand politics in America is to recognize that there
are two classes: donors and voters. Voters decide who wins,
but only after donors decide who can run -- which they can do
because it takes lots of money to run, and they're the ones
with that kind of money. Republicans have a big advantage in
this system: they offer businesses pretty much everything they
want, and ask little of them beyond acceding to their singular
fetishes (mostly guns and religion).
Democrats have a much tougher
problem: voters would flock to them because Republicans cause
them harm, but the only Democrats who can run are those backed
by donors, who severely limit what Democrats can do for their
voters. The Clinton-Obama types tried to square this circle by
appealing to more liberal-minded business segments, especially
high-growth sectors like tech, finance and entertainment. They
were fairly successful at raising money, and they won several
elections, but ultimately failed to make much headway with the
problems they campaigned on fixing.
At present, both parties have backed themselves into corners
where they are bound to fail. With ever-increasing inequality,
the donor class is ever more estranged from the voting public.
Normally, you would expect that when the pendulum swings too far
left or right, it would swing back toward the middle, but the
nature of capitalism is such that donors can never be satisfied,
so will always push for more and more. But the policies they
want only exacerbate the problems that most people feel, sooner
or later leading to disastrous breakdowns (for Republicans) or
severe dissolution (for Democrats, who while incapable of fixing
things are at least more adept at delaying and/or mitigating
their disasters).
Nathan J Robinson:
[03-12]
Overwhelmed by feelings of complicity and paralysis: "In a world
filled with horrors, where our actions feel useless, it can be hard
to muster the energy to press on." This paragraph hit close to home:
As Americans see tens of thousands of Palestinians die, we know that
our own government is responsible, through providing the weapons and
blocking UN action to stop the war. But how can we actually affect
government policy? Later this year, there will be an election, but
the choices in that election will be between the intolerable status
quo (Joe Biden) and a likely even more rabidly pro-Israel
president (Donald Trump). I don't know how it felt to oppose the
Vietnam war in 1967-68, but I suspect it must have felt similarly
frustrating, with the Democratic incumbent responsible for the war
and any Republican likely to escalate it further.
I do remember 1967-68, which spans the period from when my next
door neighbor came home from Vietnam in a box to the government's
first efforts to send me to the same fate. I knew people who went
quite literally crazy back then. (Fortunately, I was already crazy
then, and the Army decided they'd be better off without me.) So
one thing I learned was to be fairly tolerant of people I don't
agree with. Nearly everything is out of our control, so the only
real task most of us face is just coping with it.
Also the section on critiquing political books ("I have never
felt more ineffectual than at this moment"). Here's a bit:
Today, our public discourse seems to have gone off the rails entirely,
and this sometimes makes me question what my approach should be as a
political writer. Look, for example, though the
top-selling political commentary books. No.1 at the moment is a
book by Abigail Shrier, whose terrible polemic about trans kids I
reviewed a while back. This one is about how we're ruining children
by coddling them and is a broadside against mainstream psychology.
I suspect its claims are just as dubious as those in the last book.
Should I bother to go through and refute them? Will anybody care if
I do?
What else do we have in the political commentary section? More
stuff about how the left is crazy, from Jesse Watters, Christopher
Rufo, Douglas Murray, Coleman Hughes, Alex Jones, Candace Owens,
Ted Cruz, etc. Books about how there's a war on Christian America,
a war on the West, and a battle to "cancel" the American mind. Most
of the bestsellers are right-wing, and the ones that are liberal
are mostly just attacks on Trump.
That list is generated by sales, so it's likely changed a bit
since Robinson linked to it. One new add is Alan Dershowitz: War
Against the Jews: How to End Hamas Barbarism. Aside from Jonathan
Karl's Tired of Winning, the top-rated Trump book is also by
Dershowitz, but defending him. The only remotely liberal (never mind
left) book is Heather Cox Richardson's Democracy Awakening,
where she is astonishingly naïve and blasé about the real effects
of Biden's foreign policy.
[03-08]
Why we need "degrowth": Interview with Kohei Saito, author of
Slow Down: The Degrowth Manifesto.
[03-01]
Why factory farming is a moral atrocity: Interview with Lewis
Bollard, of Open Philanthrophy's farm animal program.
[02-26]
It's time to break up with capitalism: Interview with Malaika
Jabali, author of
It's Not You,
It's Capitalism: Why It's Time to Break Up and How to Move On,
"reviewed
here by Matt McManus."
[02-02]
Astra Taylor on what 'security' really means: I'm pretty sure
I've linked to this before, but I've nearly finished reading the
book -- which, not for the first time, is very good, especially
the section on education and curiosity -- so could use a review.
Aja Romano:
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Monday, March 11, 2024
Music Week
March archive
(in progress).
Music: Current count 41974 [41938] rated (+36), 27 [21] unrated (+6).
Another substantial
Speaking
of Which yesterday, plus some late additions today, bringing it
up to 206 links, 9408 words. Otherwise, I have nothing much to show
for the week, and I'm feeling as drained and hapless as I can recall,
perhaps ever. Lots of tasks and projects piling up, unattended. At
least I feel fairly well informed, and like I'm making sense when I
drop into whatever topics come my way. Reflexes, and a substantial
backlog of references I can still call up.
Meanwhile, I listened to the following bunch of records. I spent
a lot more time with the R&B comp, eventually replaying all of
it, which was enough for the promotion. Good tip from the redoubtable
Clifford Ocheltree, so thanks again. The Hawkwind album tip came
from a follower who goes by
Cloudland Blue Quartet, who featured
it in a
#13at13 list.
I didn't spend enough time on it -- certainly nothing like I would
have had I encountered it at 13 (or 21, which I was when it came out;
I certainly didn't have 13 albums at that age, and none to brag about).
It seems like I must have heard more from them at the time than I have
in the database, but not enough to really register (except as noted).
Three relatively mainstream jazz albums in the A-list this week.
I feel a bit bad about not finding less obvious choices, but sometimes
it breaks that way. The Potter album isn't actually in the 36 count,
but I moved it in to wrap it up here. None scored high enough to be
strong top-ten candidates at EOY (11, 13, 14 at the moment, or 6, 8,
9 among jazz), but they are likely to finish high in EOY polls.
Hurray for the Riff Raff is another pick with pretty broad support
(86 on 21 reviews at
AOTY; making it the year's highest-ranked album so far with that
many reviews). It's taken over the number 2
slot in my
2024 list.
As for Old Music, the Gebru album I most recommend is still
Éthiopiques 21: Ethiopia Song (1963-70 [2006], Buda Musique),
attributed more precisely to Tsegué-Maryam Guèbrou, but any of the
recent Emahoy/Mississippi compilations could do the trick. For solo
piano, I usually prefer something upbeat (Earl Hines), fanciful
(Art Tatum), and/or abrasive (Cecil Taylor), but all rules seem
to have exceptions, and this is definitely one.
PS: [03-19] I have it on good authority that
my Laura Jane Grace review, below, is "archaically transphobic." I
understand their arguments, and will consider them in the future.
But I will let this review stand. I've spent considerable time
considering how I might respond, but after one rash attempt, I
doubt that further discussion will do anyone any good.
New records reviewed this week:
Albare: Beyond Belief (2023 [2024], AM): Guitarist
Albert Dadon, born in Morocco, grew up in Israel and France, moved
to Australia in 1983 and made a fortune in business. Albums start
in 1992.
B+(*) [cd]
Bob Anderson: Live! (2023 [2024], Jazz Hang):
Standards crooner, also described as an impressionist, career
dates back to 1973, "has performed in more Las Vegas show rooms
than just about anyone." Wikipedia has a bio but doesn't list
any albums. Discogs has him as "(18)," with two two albums and
three singles, none dated. These recordings were "taken from
live performances in New York City, Las Vegas, Salt Lake City,
Hollywood, Boston, and the like," also undated. Not a great
ballad singer, but on the right song he does a pretty decent
Sinatra.
B+(*) [cd] [03-29]
Jonas Cambien: Jonas Cambien's Maca Conu (2023
[2024], Clean Feed): Belgian pianist, based in Oslo, leads a quartet
with Signe Emmeluth (alto/tenor sax), Ingebrigt Håker Flaten (bass),
and Andreas Wildhagen (drums), plus guest Guuro Kvåle (trombone) on
two tracks.
B+(***) [sp]
Ian Carey & Wood Metal Plastic: Strange Arts
(2019 [2024], Slow & Steady): Bay Area trumpet player, seventh
album, leads a "new chamber jazz septet with strings."
B+(**) [cd] [03-22]
Giuseppe Doronzo/Andy Moor/Frank Rosaly: Futuro Ancestrale
(2022 [2024], Clean Feed): Baritone saxophonist, from Italy, has
a couple previous albums, also credited with Iranian bagpipe here,
in a trio with electric guitar -- English, but has long played in
the Dutch punk band, the Ex -- and drums (from Chicago).
B+(**) [sp]
Fire!: Testament (2022 [2024], Rune Grammofon):
Trio of Mats Gustafsson (baritone sax), Johan Berthling (bass),
and Andreas Werlin (drums), formed 2009, eighth album, plus
another seven as the expanded Fire! Orchestra.
B+(***) [sp]
Glitter Wizard: Kiss the Boot (2023, Kitten Robot,
EP): Glam rock group from San Francisco, four albums 2011-19, adds
this six song, 18:30 EP. Includes a cover of "Sufragette City,"
not that they need to be so explicit about their niche.
B [sp]
Laura Jane Grace: Hole in My Head (2024, Polyvinyl):
Originally Thomas Gabel, singer-guitarist leader in punk group Against
Me!, third solo album, a short one (11 songs, 25:28). Still sounds
male, so you can just bracket the trans angle. Songs open up a bit
towards folk, partly to expound on politics, e.g.: "out in the country
is where fascists roam."
B+(***) [sp]
Dave Harrington/Max Jaffe/Patrick Shiroishi: Speak,
Moment (2021 [2024], AKP): Los Angeles-based trio:
guitar, drums, sax, with some electronics and extra percussion.
B+(**) [sp]
Keyon Harrold: Foreverland (2023 [2024], Concord):
Mainstream trumpet player, debut 2009, many credits but only a
few albums since. Major effort here, with variable lineups, and
a sticker noting special guests Common, Robert Glasper, PJ Morton,
and Laura Mvula.
B+(**) [sp]
Brittany Howard: What Now (2024, Island): Former
Alabama Shakes leader, second solo album, always winds up confusing
me, although this one kept my interest piqued longer than most.
B+(**) [sp]
Hurray for the Riff Raff: The Past Is Still Alive
(2024, Nonesuch): Band but mostly folkie singer-songwriter Alyndra
Segarra, from the Bronx via New Orleans, shows no obvious links to
either but rather seems totally assimilated into declassé Americana.
Ninth studio album. Always seemed like someone I should like more
than I did, but this album is the breakthrough, and not just in
likability. I'm not good enough at words to recall much of the
brilliance I heard, beyond the "Buffalo" lament and the "Ogallala"
reference, but they come with great ease.
A- [sp]
Idles: Tangk (2024, Partisan): British rock band,
from Bristol, fifth album since 2017, formally post-punk, have a
lot of critical and popular support. Sounds good, but ended before
anything really registered.
B+(**) [sp]
Vijay Iyer: Compassion (2022 [2024], ECM):
Pianist, from upstate New York, parents Tamil, studied physics
before deciding on music, many albums since 1995, has won
virtually everything. Trio with Linda May Han Oh (bass) and
Tyshawn Sorey (drums). Starts slow, develops into something
I never quite grasp -- one is tempted to use "dazzling," but
that belongs more to the drummer.
B+(***) [sp]
The Last Dinner Party: Prelude to Ecstasy (2024,
Island): British rock group, five women, Abigail Morris the lead
singer, debut album frequently described as art rock and/or baroque
pop.
B+(*) [sp]
Little Simz: Drop 7 (2024, Forever Living Originals,
EP): British rapper-singer Simbi Ajikawo, first mixtape 2010, four
albums and a dozen EPs, including seven Drop titles, this
one with seven titles, 14:52.
B+(**) [sp]
Mike McGinnis + 9: Outing: Road Trip II (2023 [2024],
Sunnyside): Clarinet player, albums since 2001, including his prior
Road Trip from 2012. Tentet again, with three saxes, three
brass (trumpet/trombone/French horn), Jacob Sacks on piano, bass,
and drums.
B+(**) [sp]
Emile Parisien/Roberto Negro: Les Métanuits (2023,
ACT): French soprano saxophonist, debut was a quintet in 2000, duo
with the Italian pianist, one year older but albums only since
2015. "Inspired by György Ligeti's String Quartet No. 1."
B+(**) [sp]
Emile Parisien Quartet: Let Them Cook (2024, ACT):
French saxophonist (mostly soprano, but doesn't say, and sounds more
like alto to me), debut was a quintet in 2000, info on this one is
still very sketchy, but more names on cover: Julien Loutelier (drums),
Ivan Gélugne (bass), Julien Touéry (piano).
B+(***) [sp]
Chris Potter/Brad Mehldau/John Patitucci/Brian Blade:
Eagle's Point (2024, Edition): The tenor saxophonist's
album, his pieces, but all four surnames on the cover, fellow stars
at piano, bass, and drums. Potter also plays soprano sax and bass
clarinet. When he gets going, he can be quite astonishing. Mehldau
is equally impressive, when he gets his opportunities, as here.
A- [sp]
Joel Ross: Nublues (2023 [2024], Blue Note):
Vibraphonist, fourth album since 2019, all on Blue Note, which
instantly made him some kind of star. No doubt he is, as is
his label mate and guest here, Immanuel Wilkins (alto sax).
A- [sp]
Scheen Jazzorkester & Cortex: Frameworks: Music by
Thomas Johansson (2022 [2024], Clean Feed): Norwegian
large group, ninth album since 2013, teamed up with a quartet
that's been active since 2011, both long associated with the
trumpet player who composed these five pieces.
B+(***) [sp]
Patrick Shiroishi: I Was Too Young to Hear Silence
(2020 [2023], American Dreams): Japanese-American alto saxophonist,
has produced a lot of records since 2014, mostly improv duos and
trios, this a solo, starting in a deep listening vein, struggling
to build something much more imposing (while maintaining that eery
resonance).
B+(***) [sp]
The Smile: Wall of Eyes (2024, XL): Band with
ex-Radiohead leaders Thom Yorke and Jonny Greenwood, plus Sons of
Kemet drummer Tom Skinner. Second album. Slow and plainly pretty,
not the sort of thing I find appealing.
B [sp]
Vera Sola: Peacemarker (2024, Spectraphonic/City
Slang): Singer-songwriter from Los Angeles, parents famous actors,
from which her alias provides some distance, started as a poet,
second album, first was DIY but at least has a co-producer here,
Kenneth Pattengale.
B+(**) [sp]
John Surman: Words Unspoken (2022 [2024], ECM):
British saxophonist (the whole family, but just soprano, baritone,
and bass clarinet here), avant-garde into the 1970s but settled
into ECM's ambient chill by 1979 and has been secure ever since.
With Rob Luft (guitar), Rob Waring (vibes), and Thomas Strønen
(drums). This one is exceptionally engaging.
A- [sp]
Michael Thomas: The Illusion of Choice (2023 [2024],
Criss Cross): Alto saxophonist, based in New York, three previous
albums going back to 2011, not to be confused with trumpeter of
same name (or any others: he's "(25)" at Discogs). Mainstream
quartet with Manuel Valera (piano), Matt Brewer (bass), and
Obed Calvaire (drums), playing eight originals plus "It Could
Happen to You."
B+(***) [sp]
Akiko Tsugura: Beyond Nostalgia (2023 [2024],
SteepleChase): Japanese organ player, moved to New York in 2001
ten or more albums since 2004, this one with Joe Magnarelli
(trumpet), Jerry Welcon (tenor sax), Byron Landham (drums),
and Ed Cherry (guitar).
B+(**) [sp]
The Umbrellas: Fairweather Friend (2024, Tough
Love): San Francisco-based jangle pop band, second album.
B+(*) [sp]
Yard Act: Where's My Utopia? (2024, Island):
British group, from Leeds, second album, James Smith's vocals
are most often spoken, with bits of skits cut up and scattered.
B+(**) [sp]
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries:
Emahoy Tsegue Maryam Guebru: Souvenirs (1977-85
[2024], Mississippi): Ethiopian pianist (1923-2023), described
as a nun, "Emahoy" being a religious honorific. Recorded her
first album in 1963, until recently was known mostly for her
Éthiopiques 21 compilation of solo piano. This collects
eight pieces (36:11), solo piano with vocals as soothing as the
music.
B+(***) [sp]
Old music:
Emahoy Tsege Mariam Gebru: Emahoy Tsege Mariam Gebru
(1963-70 [2016], Mississippi): Solo piano from the Ethiopian nun's
early albums (although the last three cuts, sourced from a 1996
Best Of, could be later). Seems like simple patterns, but
lives up to the hype: "some of the most moving piano music you will
ever hear."
A- [sp]
Emahoy Tsege-Mariam Gebru: Jerusalem (1972-2012
[2023], Mississippi): More solo piano (with a bit of vocal),
three tracks from a 1972
album called The Hymn of Jerusalem: The Jordan River Song,
six more from a much later album, by which time she had emigrated
to Israel. Some biographical notes: she was of "a wealthy Amhara
family," from Gondar, and learned music in a boarding school in
Switzerland, from age six. She returned to Ethiopia in 1933, and
became a "civil servant and singer to Emperor Haile Selassie."
She became a nun when she was 21, and "spent a decade living in
a hilltop monastery in Ethiopia." After that, she returned to
playing music, and released her first album in 1967, in Germany.
She emigrated to Israel in 1984, after Selassie fell, and "settled
in an Ethiopian Orthodox convent in Jerusalem."
B+(***) [sp]
Gigi W Material: Mesgana Ethiopia (2009 [2010],
M.O.D. Technologies): Ethiopian singer Ejigayehu Shibabaw, recorded
a couple albums 1997-98, then hooked up with Bill Laswell for a
series of albums from Gigi in 2001 to this live album, but
nothing since. (They were married for some period, but I haven't
found dates.) Material was a band Laswell started in 1979, breaking
up in 1985 but Laswell continued using the name for various projects
through 1999, reviving it here.
B+(**) [sp]
Hawkwind: Doremi Fasol Latido (1972, United Artists):
British space-rock band, debut 1970, still extant (Dave Brock is the
only original member left, and was probably always the main guy; Nik
Turner left in 1976, and Huw Lloyd-Langton left in 1971 but returned
for 1979-88), this their third album, with two otherwise notable
musicians present: guitarist Lemmy Kilmister (later of Motorhead),
and vocalist Robert Calvert (whose 1975 solo Lucky Leif and the
Longships, produced by Eno, was a personal favorite, and who I
credited most for the one Hawkwind album I did really love, 1977's
Quark, Strangeness and Charm). Seems too dated to turn into
a major research project at this point, but between the post-Pink
Floyd and proto-Motorhead, familiar soundposts abound.
B+(***) [sp]
Grade (or other) changes:
The R&B No. 1s of the '50s (1950-59 [2013],
Acrobat, 6CD): I still haven't filed this set, which made it a
convenient option, especially to start each day. Mostly that's
meant disc 6, where the novelties not in Rhino's canonical The
R&B Box are exceptionally catchy -- especially the Lloyd
Price hits ("Personality," "I Wanna Get Married") that I already
loved before I turned ten. But revisiting discs 1-3 clinched the
deal.
[was: A-] A [cd]
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Neal Alger: Old Souls (Calligram) [03-01]
- Sam Anning: Earthen (Earshift Music) [04-05]
- Alex Beltran: Rift (Calligram) [03-01]
- Julieta Eugenio: Stay (self-released) [03-29]
- Julien Knowles: As Many, as One (Biophilia) [04-26]
- Travis Reuter: Quintet Music (self-released) [04-19]
- Claudio Scolari Project: Intermission (Principal) [03-25]
- Dan Weiss: Even Odds (Cygnus) [03-29]
- Hein Westergaard/Katt Hernandez/Raymond Strid: The Knapsack, the Hat, and the Horn (Gotta Let It Out) [02-25]
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Sunday, March 10, 2024
Speaking of Which
Once again, started early in the week, spent most of my time here,
didn't get to everything I usually cover. Late Sunday night, figured
I should go ahead and kick this out. Monday updates possible.
Indeed, I wasted most of Monday adding things, some of which,
contrary to my usual update discipline, only appeared on Monday.
The most interesting I'll go ahead and mention here:
Alexander Ward/Jonathan Lemire: [03-11]
If Israel invades Rafah, Biden will consider conditioning military
aid to Israel. There are several articles below suggesting that
the Biden administration is starting to show some discomfort with
its Israeli masters. I've generally made light of such signals, as
they've never threatened consequences or even been unambiguously
uttered in public. I've seen several more suggesting that the long
promised invasion of Rafah -- the last corner of Gaza where some
two million people have been driven into -- could cross some kind
of "red line."
I am willing to believe that "Genocide Joe" is a
bit unfair: that while he's not willing to stand up to Netanyahu,
he's not really comfortable with the unbounded slaughter and mass
destruction Israel is inflicting. I characterize his pier project
below as "passive-aggressive." I think he's somehow trying (but
way too subtly) to make Israel's leaders realize that their dream
of killing and/or expelling everyone from Gaza isn't going to be
allowed, so at some point they're going to have to relent, and
come up with some way of living with the survivors.
I don't recall where, but I think I've seen some constructive
reaction from Biden to the "uncommitted" campaign that took 13%
of Michigan and 18% of Minnesota votes. So it's possible that the
message is getting through even if the raw numbers are still far
short of overwhelming. The Israel Lobby has so warped political
space in Washington that few politicians can as much as imagine
how out of touch and tone-deaf they've become on this issue.
Still, Biden has a lot of fence-mending to do.
I'll try not to add more, but next week will surely come around,
bringing more with it.
Initial count: 181 links, 7,582 words.
Updated count [03-11]: 207 links, 9,444 words.
Top story threads:
Not sure where to put this, so how about here?
Jacob Bogage: [03-08]
Government shutdown averted as Senate passes $459 billion funding
bill: In other words, Republicans once again waited until the
last possible moment, then decided not to pull the trigger in their
Russian roulette game over the budget. It seems be an unwritten
rule that in electing Mike Johnson as Speaker, the extreme-right
gets support for everything except shutting down the government.
Israel:
Mondoweiss:
[03-04]
Day 150: Israel is 'engineering famine' in Gaza. "Amnesty
International says Israel is 'engineering famine' in Gaza. Organization
head Agnes Callamard adds, 'all states that cut UNRWA funding, sold
weapons and supported Israel bear responsibility too.'"
[03-05]
Day 151: Israel 'campaigns' to end UNRWA in Gaza Strip: "UNRWA's
chief says dismantling the agency is 'short-sighted' and will 'sow
the seeds of hatred, resentment, and future conflict.' Israeli forces
fire at Palestinians seeking aid and food in Gaza City and detain
others in southern Gaza."
[03-06]
Day 152: Prospect of breakthrough in ceasefire talks remains thin:
"Canada will resume funding to UNRWA and pay a pledge of $25m due in
April. In Gaza, another Palestinian child dies of thirst and hunger
in the north, bringing the number of children to die from malnutrition
to 18."
[03-07]
Day 153: Over 2 dozen Palestinian captives have 'died' in Israeli
detention camps: "At least 20 Palestinians have died as a result
of malnutrition and dehydration in Gaza, health officials say.
Meanwhile, new reports from Israeli media say 27 Palestinian
captives who were being held in Israeli 'makeshift cages' have
died."
[03-08]
Day 154: Biden's maritime aid corridor to Gaza slammed as
'unrealistic': "Human rights experts say the Biden administration's
proposed maritime corridor is a much less effective solution to
addressing the dire needs of Gaza's besieged and starving population
than a ceasefire and pressuring Israel to open land crossings."
[03-09]
Day 155: Deadly aid drop and obstacles to a maritime corridor expose
farcical humanitarian response to Gaza famine: "At least eighteen
children have died in Gaza from malnutrition, while deaths by starvation
have risen to 23. Meanwhile, the Pentagon announced that Biden's proposed
floating pier would take two months and 1000 US troops to build.
[03-10]
Day 156: Israel deploys 15,000 troops in West Bank as Ramadan starts:
"Ceasefire talks falter as Izz El-Din Al-Qassam Brigades spokesperson
says Israel is using 'deception and evasion.' Israel deploys thousands
of troops in the West Bank and Jerusalem ahead of plans to restrict
access to Al-Aqsa Mosque during Ramadan."
Shane Bauer: [02-26]
The Israeli settlers attacking their Palestinian neighbors: "With
the world's focus on Gaza, settlers have used wartime chaos as cover
for violence and dispossession."
Giorgio Cafiero: [03-05]
Why Egypt can't and won't open the floodgates from Gaza.
Emma Farge: [03-07]
Israel destroying Gaza's food system in 'starvation' tactic.
Noa Galili: [03-10]
Strangled by Israel for decades, Gaza's future must begin with free
movement.
Imad Abu Hawash:
A new surge of settler outposts is terrorizing Palestinians off
their land.
Ibrahim Husseini: [03-08]
Palestinians expect Israeli crackdown on worship at al-Aqsa during
Ramadan.
Ellen Ioanes: [03-07]
What the UN report on October 7 sexual violence does -- and doesn't --
say.
Eyal Lurie-Pardes:
Journalism out, hasbara in: How Israeli news joined the Gaza war
effort.
Khalid Mohammed:
Desperate to escape Gaza carnage, Palestinians are forced to pay
exorbitant fees to enter Egypt.
Aseel Mousa: [03-08]
As Ramadan approaches, Rafah braces for an Israeli ground invasion.
Jonathan Ofir: [03-06]
'We are the masters of the house': Israeli channels air snuff videos
featuring systematic torture of Palestinians.
Yumna Patel: [03-05]
Palestinian PM's resignation nothing more than 'cosmetic shake up,'
analysts say.
Reuters: [03-09]
Israeli settlements expand by record amount, UN rights chief
says.
Jeffrey St Clair: [03-02]
Gaza Diary: Burning all illusions.
- Times of Israel: [03-08]
Five Palestinians killed in Gaza after aid airdrop malfunctions.
Nick Turse:
Who could have predicted the US war in Somalia would fail? The
Pentagon.
Israel vs. world opinion: Note that Biden's relief scheme
for Gaza, announced in his State of the Union address, has been moved
into its own sandbox, farther down, next to other Biden/SOTU pieces.
Kyle Anzalone: [03-07]
South Africa urges ICJ for emergency order as famine looms over
Gaza.
James Bamford: [03-06]
Time is running out to stop the carnage in Gaza: "Given the toll
from bombing and starvation, Gaza will soon become the world's largest
unmarked grave." Actually, time ran out sometime in the first week
after Oct. 7, when most Americans -- even many on the left who had
become critical of Israeli apartheid -- were too busy competing in
their denunciations of Hamas to notice how the Netanyahu government
was clearly intent to commit genocide. At this point, the carnage
is undeniable -- perhaps the only question is when the majority of
the killing will shift (or has shifted) from arms to environmental
factors (including starvation), because the latter are relatively
hard to count (or are even more likely to be undercounted). Of
course, stopping the killing is urgent, no matter how many days
we fail.
Greer Fay Cashman: [03-07]
President Herzog faces calls for arrest on upcoming Netherlands
visit.
Jonathan Cook: [03-07]
How the 'fight against antisemitism' became a shield for Israel's
genocide.
Richard Falk: [02-25]
In Gaza, the west is enabling the most transparent genocide in human
history.
Noah Feldman: [03-05]
How Oct. 7 is forcing Jews to reckon with Israel. Excerpt from
his new book, To Be a Jew Today: A New Guide to God, Israel, and
the Jewish People.
Daniel Finn: [03-07]
Slaughter in Gaza has discredited Britain's political class.
Fred Kaplan: [03-06]
Four things that will have to happen for the Israel-Hamas war to
end: I have a lot of respect for Kaplan as an analyst of such
matters, but the minimal solution he's created is impossible. His
four things?
- The Hamas leadership has to surrender or go into exile. ("Qatar
will have to crack down on Hamas, or perhaps provide its military
leaders refuge in exchange for their departure from Gaza.")
- "Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and other Sunni powers in the region will
have to help rebuild Gaza and foster new, more moderate political
leaders."
- "Israel will at least have to say that it favors the
creation of a Palestinian state and to take at least a small
movement in that direction." Why anyone should believe Israel
in this isn't explained.
- "The United States will have to serve as some sort of guarantor
to all of this -- and not only for Israel."
In other words, every nation in the region has to bend to Israel's
stubborn insistence that they have to maintain control over every
inch of Gaza, even though they've made it clear they'd prefer for
everyone living there to depart or die. In any such scenario, it is
inevitable that resistance will resurface to again threaten Israel's
security, no matter how many layers of proxies are inserted, and no
matter how systematically Israel culls its "militants." Short of a
major sea change in Israeli opinion -- which is a prospect impossible
to take seriously, at least in the short term -- there is only one
real solution possible, which is for Israel to disown Gaza. Israel
can continue to maintain its borders, its Iron Walls and Iron Domes,
and can threaten massive retaliation if anyone on the Gaza side of
the border attacks them. (This can even include nuclear, if that's
the kind of people they are.) But Israel no longer gets any say in
how the people of Gaza live. From that point, Israel is out of the
picture, and Gaza has no reason to risk self-destruction by making
symbolic gestures.
That still leaves Gaza with a big problem -- just not an Israel
problem. That is because Israel has rendered Gaza uninhabitable, at
least for the two million people still stuck there. Those people
need massive aid, and even so many of them probably need to move
elsewhere, at least temporarily. Without Israel to fight, Hamas
instantly becomes useless. They will release their hostages, and
disband. Some may go into exile. The rest may join in rebuilding,
ultimately organized under a local democracy, which would have no
desire let alone capability to threaten Israel. This is actually
very simple, as long as outside powers don't try to corrupt the
process by recruiting local cronies (a big problem in the region,
with the US, its Sunni allies, Iran, its Shiite friends, Turkey,
and possibly others serial offenders).
Sure, this would leave Israel with a residual Palestinian problem
elsewhere: both with its second- and lesser-class citizens and wards,
and with its still numerous external refugees. But that problem has
not yet turned genocidal (although it's getting close, and is clearly
possible as long as Smotrich and Ben-Gvir are part of Israel's ruling
coalition). But there is time to work on that, especially once Israel
is freed from the burden and horror of genocide in Gaza. There are
lots of ideas that could work as solutions, but they all ultimately
to accepting that everyone, regardless of where they live, should
enjoy equal rights and opportunities. That will be a tough pill for
many Israelis to swallow, but is the only one that will ultimately
free them from the internecine struggle Israelis and Palestinians
have been stuck with for most of a century. There's scant evidence
that most Israelis want that kind of security, so people elsewhere
will need to continue with BDS-like strategies of persuasion. But
failure to make progress will just expose Israelis to revolts like
they experienced on Oct. 7, and Palestinians to the immiseration
and gloom they've suffered so often over many decades decades.
Colbert I King: [03-08]
The United States cannot afford to be complicit in Gaza's tragedy:
True or not, isn't it a bit late to think of this?
Nicholas Kristof: [03-19]
'People are hoping that Israel nukes us so we get rid of this pain':
Texts with a Gazan acquaintance named Esa Alshannat, not Hamas, but
after Israeli soldiers left an area, found "dead, rotten and half eaten
by wild dogs." Kristof explains: "Roughly 1 percent of Gaza's people
today are Hamas fighters. To understand what the other 99 percent are
enduring, as the United States supplies weapons for this war and vetoes
cease-fire resolutions at the United Nations, think of Alshannat and
multiply him by two million."
Debbie Nathan:
Vivian Nereim: [03-10]
As Israel's ties to Arab countries fray, a stained lifeline remains:
The United Arab Emirates is still on speaking terms with Israel,
but doesn't have much to show for their solicitude.
Ilan Pappé: [02-01]
It is dark before the dawn, but Israeli settler colonialism is at
an end.
Mitchell Plitnick: [03-07]
Replacing Netanyahu with Gantz won't fix the problem.
Rebecca Lee Sanchez: [03-06]
Gaza's miracle of the manna: Aid and the American God complex.
Philip Weiss:
[03-07]
Zionism and Jewish identity: "American Zionists are not deluded
about Zionism. They know exactly what Israel is, and they are actively
supporting blatant supremacy, racism, and apartheid. But that is
changing, because Zionism is finally being challenged in the
left/liberal press."
[03-10]
Weekly Briefing: Israeli genocide is 'embarrassing' Biden, at
last.
Brett Wilkins: [03-06]
AIPAC's dark money arm unleashes $100 million: "Amid the
Netanyahu government's assault on Gaza and intensifying repression
in the West Bank, AIPAC is showing zero tolerance for even the
mildest criticism of Israel during the 2024 US elections."
America's increasingly desperate and pathetic empire:
I started this section to separate out stories on how the US was
expanding its operations in the Middle East, ostensibly to deter
regional adversaries from attacking Israel while Israel was busy
with its genocide in Gaza. At the time, it seemed like Israel was
actively trying to promote a broader war, partly to provide a
distraction from its own focus (much as WWII served to shield
the Holocaust), and partly to give the Americans something else
to focus on. Israel tried selling this as a
"seven-front
war" -- a line that Thomas Friedman
readily swallowed, quickly recovering from his initial shock at
Israel's overreaction in Gaza -- but with neither Iran nor the US
relishing what Israel imagined to be the main event, thus far only
the Houthis in Yemen took the bait (where US/UK reprisals aren't
much of a change from what the Saudis had been doing, with US help,
for years). So this section has gradually been taken over by more
general articles on America's imperial posture (with carve outs
for the still-raging wars in Israel/Gaza and Ukraine/Russia.
Ramzy Baroud:
[03-04]
To defend Israel's actions, the US is destroying the int'l legal
system it once constructed: I'm not sure that the US ever supported
any sort of international justice system. The post-WWII trials in Japan
and Germany were rigged to impose "victor's justice." The UN started
as a victors' club, with Germany and Japan excluded, and the Security
Council was designed so small states couldn't gang up on the powers.
And when Soviet vetoes precluded using the UN as a cold war tool, the
US invented various "coalitions of the willing" to rubber-stamp policy.
The US never recognized independent initiatives like the ICJ, although
the US supports using the ICJ where it's convenient, like against Russia
in Ukraine. The only "rules-based order" the US supports is its own,
and even there its blind support for Israel arbitrary and capricious --
subject to no rules at all, only the whims of Netanyahu.
[03-08]
On solidarity and Kushner's shame: How Gaza defeated US strategem,
again.
Mac William Bishop: [02-23]
American idiots kill the American century: "After decades of
foreign-policy bungling and strategic defeats, the US has never
seemed weaker -- and dictators around the world know it."
Christopher Caldwell: [03-09]
This prophetic academic now foresees the West's defeat: On
French historian/political essayist Emmanuel Todd, who claims to
have been the first to predict the demise of the Soviet Union (see
his The Final Fall: An Essay on the Decomposition of the Soviet
Sphere, from 1976), has a new book called La Défaite de
l'Occident.
Caldwell, who has a book called The Age of Entitlement,
seems to be an unconventional conservative, so even when he has
seeming insights it's hard to trust them. Even harder to get a
read on Todd. (The NYTimes' insistence on "Mr." at every turn has
never been more annoying.) But their skepticism of Biden et al.
on Ukraine/Russia is certainly warranted. By the way, here are
some old Caldwell pieces:
Brian Concannon: [03-08]
US should let Haiti reclaim its democracy.
Gregory Elich: [03-08]
How Madeleine Albright got the war the US wanted: NATO goes on
the warpath, initially in Yugoslavia, then . . . "the opportunity
to expand Western domination over other nations."
Tom Engelhardt: [03-05]
A big-time war on terror: Living on the wrong world: "A
planetary cease fire is desperately needed."
Connor Freeman: [03-07]
Biden's unpopular wars reap mass death and nuclear brinkmanship.
Marc Martorell Junyent: [03-07]
Tempest in a teapot: British illusions and American hegemony from
Iraq to Yemen. Review of Tom Stevenson's book,
Someone
Else's Empire: British Illusions and American Hegemony.
Joshua Keating: [03-09]
The Houthis have the world's attention -- and they won't give it up:
"What do Yemen's suddenly world-famous rebels really want, and what will
make them stop?" One lesson here is that deterrence only works if it
threatens a radical break from the status quo. The Saudis, with American
support, have been bombing the Houthis for more than a decade now,
causing great hardship for the Yemeni people, but hardly moving the
needle on Houthi political power. So how much worse would it get if
they picked a fight with Israel's proxy navy? Moreover, by standing
up to Israel and its unwitting allies, they gain street cred and a
claim to the moral high ground. For similar reasons, sanctions are
more likely to threaten nations that aren't used to them. Once you're
under sanctions, which with the US tends to be a life sentence, what
difference does a few more make? It's too late for mere threats to
change the behavior of Yemen, Iran, North Korea, and/or Russia --
though maybe not to affect powers whose misbehaviors have thus far
escaped American sanctions, like Israel and Saudi Arabia. But for
the rest, to effect change, you need to do something positive, to
give them some motivation and opportunity to change. In many cases,
that shouldn't even be hard. Just try to do the right thing. Respect
the independence of others. Look for mutual benefits, like in trade.
Help them help their own people. And stop defending genocide.
Nan Levinson: [03-07]
The enticements of war (and peace).
Blaise Malley: [03-06]
Opportunity calls as Cold War warriors exit the stage: "Will
Mitch McConnell's replacement represent the old or new guard in
his party's foreign policy?"
Paul R Pillar: [03-06]
Why Netanyahu is laughing all the way to the bank: "David Petraeus
said recently that US leverage on Israel to do the right thing in Gaza
is 'overestimated' -- that's just not true."
Robert Wright: [03-08]
The real problem with the Trump-Biden choice: This piece is
far-reaching enough I could have slotted it anywhere, but it has
the most bearing here: the problem is how much Trump and Biden
have in common, especially where it comes to foreign affairs:
"America First" may seem like a different approach from Biden's,
but the latter is just a slightly more generous and less intemperate
variation, as both start from the assumption that America is and must
be the leader, and everyone else needs to follow in line. Trump thinks
he can demand the other pay tribute; Biden possibly knows better,
but his pursuit of arms deals makes me wonder. Wright cites a piece
by Adam Tooze I can't afford or find, quoting it only up to the
all-important "but" after which the Trump-Biden gap narrows. While
I'm sure Tooze has interesting things to say, Wright's efforts to
steer foreign policy thinking away from the zero-sum confrontations
of the Metternich-to-Kissinger era are the points to consider.
Fareed Zakaria: [03-08]
Amid the horror in Gaza, it's easy to miss that the Middle East has
changed.
Election notes: Sixteen states and territories voted for
president on Super Tuesday, mostly confirming what we already knew.
Biden won everywhere (except American Samoa), even over "uncommitted"
(which mostly got a push from those most seriously upset over his
support for Israeli genocide). Trump won everywhere -- except in
Vermont, narrowly to Nikki Haley, who nonetheless shuttered her
campaign (but hasn't yet endorsed Trump). Dean Phillips dropped out
of the Democratic race after getting 8% in his home state of Minnesota
and 9% in Oklahoma. He endorsed Biden. I'm not very happy with any of
the news summaries I've seen, but here are a few to skim through:
538;
AP;
Ballotpedia;
CBS News;
CNBC;
CNN;
Guardian;
NBC News;
New York Times;
Politico;
USA Today;
Washington Post.
One quote I noticed (from CNN) was from a "reluctant Democrat" in
Arizona: "It's hard to vote for someone with multiple felony charges;
and it's also very hard to vote for someone that is pro-genocide."
Michael C Bender: [03-06]
How Trump's crushing primary triumph masked quiet weaknesses:
"Even though he easily defeated Nikki Haley, the primary results
suggested that he still has long-term problems with suburban voters,
moderates, and independents."
Aaron Blake: [03-08]
The Texas GOP purge and other below-the-radar Super Tuesday
nuggets.
Nate Cohn: [03-07]
Where Nikki Haley won and what it means: Inside the Beltway (61%),
Home base and Mountain West cities (57%), Vermont (56%), University
towns (56%), Resort towns (55%): In other words, the sorts of places
that would automatically disqualify one as a Real Republican.
Antonia Hitchens: [03-06]
Watching Super Tuesday returns at Mar-a-Lago.
Ro Khanna: [03-07]
The message from Michigan couldn't be more clear: Actually,
these figures (see Nichols below) are hardly enough for a bump in
the road to Biden's reelection -- unlike, say, Eugene McCarthy's
New Hampshire showing in 1968, where Lyndon Johnson got the message
clearly enough to give up his campaign. What they do show is that
the near-unanimity of Democratic politicians in support of Israel
is not shared by the rank and file.
Adam Nagourney/Shane Goldmacher: [03-09]
The Biden-Trump rerun: A nation craving change gets more of the same:
I bypassed this first time around, but maybe we should offer some kind
of reward for the week's most inane opinion piece. Wasn't Nagourney a
finalist in one of those hack journalists playoffs? (If memory serves --
why the hell can't I just google this? -- he finished runner-up to
Karen Tumulty.)
John Nichols: [03-05]
Gaza is on the ballot all over America: "Inspired by Michigan's
unexpectedly high 'uncommitted' vote, activists across the country
are now mounting campaigns to send Biden a pro-cease-fire message."
Uncommitted slate votes thus far (from NYTimes link, above):
Minnesota: 18.9%;
Michigan: 13.2%;
North Carolina: 12.7%;
Massachusetts: 9.4%;
Colorado: 8.1%;
Tennessee: 7.9%;
Alabama: 6.0%;
Iowa: 3.9%.
Alexander Sammon:
[03-09]
Katie Porter said her Senate primary was "rigged." Let's discuss!
"Her complaint was kind of MAGA-coded. But it wasn't entirely wrong."
Adam Schiff had a huge fundraising advantage over Porter, as Porter
did over the worthier still Barbara Lee. This is one of the few pieces
I've found that looks into where that money came from (AIPAC chipped
in $5 million; a crypto-backed PAC doubled that), and how it was used,
explained in more depth in the following:
[03-05]
Democrats have turned to odd, cynical tactics to beat one another in
California's Senate race. Schiff wound up spending a lot of money
not trying to win Democrats over from Porter and Lee -- something that
might require explaining why he supported the Iraq War (which itself
partly explains why he got all that AIPAC money) -- but instead spent
millions raising Republican Steve Garvey's profile. In the end, Schiff
was so successful he lost first place to Garvey (on one but not both
of the contests: one to finish Feinstein's term, one for the six year
term that follows), but at least he got past Porter and Lee, turning
the open primary into a traditional R-D contest (almost certainly D
in California).
Michael Scherer: [03-08]
Inside No Labels decision to plow ahead with choosing presidential
candidates: "The group announced on a call with supporters
Friday plans to announce a selection process for their third-party
presidential ticket on March 14 with a nomination by April."
More No Labels:
Li Zhou: [03-06]
Jason Palmer, the guy who beat Biden in American Samoa, briefly
explained.
Trump, and other Republicans:
David Atkins: [03-06]
The incompetent malfeasance of today's Republican party: "They're
mendacious buffoons, but their lack of political acumen makes them no
less dangerous than if they knew how to shoot straight." Laugh as you
may, but in much of the country, they're still kicking your ass.
Zack Beauchamp: [03-06]
The Republican primary was a joke. It tells us something deadly
serious. "Trump's inevitable romp to victory revealed how strong
his hold on the GOP is -- and how dangerous he remains to democracy."
Ryan Bort: [03-08]
Republicans tap election denier, Trump's daughter-in-law to run
RNC: "The MAGA takeover of the Republican National Committee
is complete, and the group appears poised to subsidize Trump's
legal fights." Michael Whatley and Lara Trump.
Zak Cheney-Rice: [03-09]
The normalization of Trump's alleged crimes: "His legal strategy
is both buying him time and erasing the accusations against him."
Juan Cole: [03-06]
Trump, Like Biden, supports Israeli Campaign against Gaza: "You've got
to finish the Problem": Odd turn of phrase, isn't it? (I usually
try to standardize case in headlines, but this one was so peculiar, I
left it alone.) Most people try to solve problems, but "finish" could
have two meanings, one suggesting that it isn't problem enough yet,
so needs to be made more complete; the other interpretation, which is
more like Trump, is that "Problem" means Palestinians, and "finish"
means annihilation (or more vividly, if you know the original German,
Vernichtung). I don't quite buy the argument that "Trump's position
on Gaza is not any different from that of Joe Biden." Biden may feel
powerless to object to Israel, but he's not unaware of the human cost.
Trump simply doesn't care. As long as the checks don't bounce, he's
good to go. More on Trump's Gaza "problem":
Dan Diamond/Alex Horton: [03-07]
Navy demoted Ronny Jackson after probe into White House behavior:
"Trump's former physician and GOP ally is now a retired captain, not
an admiral."
Jesse Drucker: [03-09]
How Trump's Justice Dept. derailed an investigation of a major
company: "The industrial giant Caterpillar hired William Barr
and other lawyers to defuse a federal criminal investigation of
alleged tax dodges."
Michael Gold: [03-10]
Trump vilifies migrants and mocks Biden's stutter in Georgia
speech.
Jessica M Goldstein:
The right-wing war on abortion has nothing to do with babies:
"Coverage of the recent controversy over IVF has made a perilous
omission: This is a battle over body autonomy." Related:
Alex Isenstadt: [03-11]
Ralph Reed's army plans $62 million spending spree backing Trump:
"Faith & amp; Freedom plans to spend big registering and turning out
evangelicals and handing out 30 million pieces of literature at
churches."
Josh Kovensky: [03-09]
Inside a secret society of prominent right-wing Christian men prepping
for a 'national divorce'.
Paul Krugman:
Eric Levitz:
[03-05]
Republicans' voter suppression obsession may end up helping . . .
Democrats? "The GOP convinced itself it could only win with a
smaller, whiter electorate. The polls show that's just not true."
[03-06]
Republicans just passed up the chance to win a historic landslide:
"If Republicans ever figure out how to nominate a normal human, Democrats
could be in trouble." You might think that, but Romney and McCain, who
were about as close as Republicans get to normal these days, lost to
Obama, and Bush didn't fare much better, leaving office with the lowest
approval rating at least since Nixon. Republican policies are moving
disasters, many so obviously defective even they don't dare campaign
on them. The only option, other than betraying their base(s), is to
deflect and dissemble, which they do mostly by generating rage. Even
that doesn't always work, but Trump was credibly crazy in 2016, and
pulled off a miracle, and when he did, he raised the stakes about
what winning meant. As long as he has a chance of winning -- and he
does have enough polls to keep that fantasy going -- he's the horse
the base wants to bet on, because he's the only one promising to
fulfill their fantasies. Until he loses as bad as Landon in 1936,
or at least Mondale in 1984, Republicans have little reason to
recalculate.
Daniel Lippman: [03-09]
Kellyanne Conway advocating for TikTok on Capitol Hill:
Trump failed to "drain the swamp," but his aides are learning to
earn there.
Alexandra Marquez: [03-10]
Lindsey Graham: Biden has 'screwed the world up every way you can':
I can't help but wonder how many people actually fall for this sort
of vague but indiscriminate line, which has become default for most
Republicans. Graham spouts more on foreign policy, where it's most
clear that he wants to "screw the world up" in ways even Biden hasn't
tried.
Stephanie Mencimer: [03-08]
Lara Trump is all about meritocracy: "That's why she got the
top job at the RNC."
Mary Jo Murphy: [03-07]
This book about Trump voters goes for the jugular: Another
review of Tom Schaller/Paul Waldman:
White
Rural Rage: The Threat to American Democracy. And another:
Nicole Narea: [03-06]
Mark Robinson, the North Carolina GOP nominee for governor, is off the
rails even by MAGA standards: "North Carolina has seen a politician
like Robinson before: Jesse Helms." More:
Anna North: [03-04]
Fetal personhood laws, explained: "The anti-abortion legal theory
that could jeopardize IVF around the country."
Charles P Pierce: Many recent
short posts, not all of which apply to this slot, but the first
couple do, and easier to keep them together, with more respect for
their author:
Greg Sargent:
Trump's angry rant about Biden's speech showcases MAGA's ugliest
scam.
Charles Sykes: [03-05]
Donald Trump, the luckiest politician who ever lived.
Ishaan Tharoor: [03-08]
Trump, Orban and the GOP's deep obsession with foreign demagogues:
This column includes an interview with Jacob Heilbrunn, author of
America Last:
The Right's Century-Long Romance with Foreign Dictators.
The century is just enough time to go back to Mussolini, lionized
as the guy who got the trains to run on time.
Liz Theoharis: [03-10]
The great unwinding: "The failing battle for health and healthcare
in these all too disunited states." Republicans are responsible for
this, and need to own it: "Since March 2023, 16 million Americans have
lost healthcare coverage, including four million children, as states
redefine eligibility for Medicaid for the first time in three years."
This is one of many areas where Democrats were able to expand the
safety net to ameliorate the horrors of the Covid-19 pandemic, but
as Republicans recovered from the panic, they've killed off these
much needed expansions as soon as possible.
Peter Wehner: [03-10]
If there's one thing Trump is right about, it's Republicans:
They'll follow him anywhere:
Mr. Trump is a human blowtorch, prepared to burn down democracy. So
is his party. When there's no bottom, there's no bottom.
The next 34 weeks are among the more consequential in the life of
this nation. Mr. Trump was a clear danger in 2016; he's much more of
a danger now. The former president is more vengeful, more bitter and
more unstable than he was, which is saying something. There would be
fewer guardrails and more true believers in a second Trump term. He's
already shown he'll overturn an election, support a violent insurrection
and even allow his vice president to be hanged. There's nothing he won't
do. It's up to the rest of us to keep him from doing it.
Biden's band-aid folly: Unveiled in Biden's State of the
Union address, q.v., but for this week, let's give it its own section:
Alex Horton: [03-08]
How the US military will use a floating pier to deliver Gaza aid:
"Construction will take up to two months and require 1,000 US troops
who will remain off shore, officials say. Once complete, it will
enable delivery of 2 million meals daily."
Jonathan Cook: [03-10]
Biden's pier-for-Gaza is hollow gesture.
Kareem Fahim/Hazem Balousha: [03-08]
Biden plan to build Gaza port, deliver aid by sea draws skepticism,
ridicule. Sounds like they had a contest to come up with the most
expensive, least efficient method possible to trickle life-sustaining
aid into Gaza, without in any way inhibiting Israel's systematic
slaughter.
Miriam Berger/Sufian Taha/Heidi Levine/Loveday Morris: [03-05]
The improbable US plan for a revitalized Palestinian security force:
Because the US did such a great job of training the Afghan security
force?
Noga Tarnopolsky: [03-09]
The Biden plan to ditch Netanyahu: "The 'come to Jesus moment' is
already here, according to Israeli and US sources." I don't give this
report much credit, but it stands to reason that eventually Biden will
tire of Netanyahu jerking him around just so he can further embarrass
both countries with what is both in intent and effect genocide. I do
see ways in which Biden's initial subservience is evolving into some
kind of passive-aggressive resistance. Rather than denounce Israel
for making reasonable aid possible, Biden has challenged Israel to
spell out what they would allow, and agreed even as these schemes are
patently ridiculous. It's only a matter of time until Israel starts
attacking American aid providers. For another piece:
Zack Beauchamp: [03-08]
Are Biden and the Democrats finally turning on Israel? "Biden's
new plan to build a pier on the Gaza coast seems to say yes. The
continued military aid to Israel says otherwise."
Biden's State of the Union speech: A section for everything
else related, including official and unofficial Republican responses:
Biden and/or the Democrats:
Perry Bacon Jr: [03-07]
Biden is failing at the most important task of his presidency.
Bacon's definition: "Biden has failed at the most important task
for a Democratic president in the 2020s: eliminating or at least
drastically reducing the chances of Trump or someone who shares
his radical beliefs being his successor." That may have been the
job, but it's really hard to see how he could have done it. When
I saw the headline, I filled in my own answer, which is that Biden
simply isn't a very good communicator. But Obama was, technically
at least, pretty much all you could hope for in a communicator,
and who listened to him? Bill Clinton was also pretty good. But
both were hobbled by a hostile media that relentlessly amplified
Republican countermessaging, and by the muddle created by their
own willingness to conform to conservative framing of issues --
is it any wonder that they were more successful at persuading
donors than voters? Franklin Roosevelt was the great communicator
among all presidents, but we no longer live in a world where
nominally Republican farmers (like, say, my grandfather) would
tune in to listen to him explain how banking worked, and believe
a word he said.
Jonathan Chait: [03-05]
Good riddance, Kyrsten Sinema, plutocratic shill: "She killed her
career by blocking bipartisan ideas that threatened the rich." The
Democrat-turned-independent from Arizona finally decided not to run
for a second term. Presumably she'll reap her rewards as a lobbyist,
not that she's likely to have much influence over anyone. More:
Timothy Noah:
The stealth budget cuts imperiling the Biden antitrust agenda.
Evan Osnos: [03-04]
Joe Biden's last campaign: A long New Yorker profile on
Biden, by just about the only writer who managed to get a biography
of Biden together before the 2020 election (and just barely).
Andrew Prokop: [03-08]
The media's coverage of Biden's age needs a rethink: "There's
been too much focus on trivialities."
John E Schwarz: [03-01]
Democratic presidents have better economic performances than Republican
ones: This has been true for so long you'd think everyone would be
acknowledging it.
Astra Taylor/Eleni Schirmer: [03-05]
The Biden administration has a chance to deliver student debt relief.
It must act.
Benjamin Wallace-Wells: [03-06]
Can Joe Biden fight from behind in a rematch against Donald Trump?
Legal matters and other crimes:
Elie Honig: [03-08]
Biden's looming nightmare pardons: Ever since this "former
federal and state prosecutor" started writing for Intelligencer,
his pieces have sounded like stealth briefs from the Trump legal
team, even if not things they would actually want to own. This
one at least assumes things not yet in evidence: that Trump is
actually tried and convicted and sentenced to jail time -- the
power may be to pardon, but all he's asking for is commutation
of prison time, not full pardons. As that's increasingly unlikely
before November, the assumption may also be that Biden wins then,
so has some breathing room before having to consider the issue,
which would leave plenty of time for this discussion, unlike now.
Josh Kovensky: [03-05]
Feds slap 12 new counts on Bob 'Gold Bars' Menendez: Senator
(D-NJ).
Ian Millhiser: [03-10]
Do Americans still have a right to privacy? "With courts coming
for abortion and IVF, it's hard not to wonder what the Supreme Court
will go after next."
Climate, environment, and energy:
Ukraine War:
Blaise Malley: [03-08]
Diplomacy Watch: Chinese diplomat shuttling to Russia, and Ukraine.
Turkey is also making efforts to mediate the conflict.
Francesca Ebel/Robyn Dixon: [02-29]
Putin threatens nuclear response to NATO troops if they go to
Ukraine.
Francesca Ebel/Serhiy Morgunov: [03-08]
Russia's opposition and Ukraine find it impossible to unite against
Putin.
Mark Episkopos: [03-08]
What will more aid to Ukraine accomplish? "There are limits to
what Kyiv can do, even with an indefinite flow of Western assistance."
Valerie Hopkins: [03-01]
Thousands turn out for Navalny's funeral in Moscow.
Daniel Larison: [03-05]
Victoria Nuland never shook the mantle of ideological meddler:
"Blurting out F-ck the EU' typified her blunt, interventionist style
throughout three presidential administrations."
Emily Rauhala: [03-07]
Sweden finally joins NATO in expansion spurred by Putin's Ukraine
war.
Lauren Wolfe: [01-16]
Putin's history lessons: Review of Yaroslav Trofimov:
Our
Enemies Will Vanish: The Russian Invasion and Ukraine's War of
Independence, which is somewhat tangential to the subhed
argument that Putin's rhetoric about the unity of Russia and Ukraine
has laid "the rhetorical groundwork for a forever war."
Amanda Yen: [03-11]
Hungary's Viktor Orban: Trump 'won't give a penny' to Ukraine if
elected. One of the stranger recent political dynamics is that
as Trump digs in more as the anti-war (and especially, anti-world-war)
candidate, Democrats are trying to rally support for Ukraine as
necessary to spite Trump here in America. Why they think that's
a winning strategy is beyond me. They could argue that unified
support for Ukraine would help them negotiate a better deal to
end the war, but first they need to be open to negotiating, which
so far doesn't seem to be the case. America has a bad history of
never negotiating reasonable exits from conflicts. Rather, in
Vietnam and Afghanistan, they negotiated deals where they just
slipped away, leaving their supposed allies to collapse, or in
Korea, where they signed a ceasefire but refused to call it an
end to the war. A reasonable deal with Russia is possible, and
it could lead to further reasonable deals in the future, in the
long run ending a conflict that the US has done as much or more
to fuel as Putin has. Trump may pull out, but he won't negotiate
a real deal, because he doesn't know how, and he doesn't care.
But even the bad deals I've mentioned were better for Americans
than the hopeless, pointless wars they escaped from. So even if
that's all Trump is promising, many people will see it as better
than Biden and the Democrats pouring endless resources into a
stalemate.
Around the world:
Other stories:
Michelle Alexander: [03-08]
Only revolutionary love can save us now: "Martin Luther King Jr's
1967 speech condemning the Vietnam War offers a powerful moral compass
as we face the challenges of our time."
Indivar Dutta-Gupta/Korian Warren: [03-04]
The war on poverty wasn't enough: "While Lyndon B Johnson's
effort made some lasting impacts, the United States still has some
of the highest rates of nonelderly poverty among wealthy nations."
As the article notes, Johnson's programs brought big improvements,
but the Vietnam War hurt him politically, and his successors lost
interest: e.g., Nixon's appointment of Donald Rumsfeld to run the
Office of Economic Opportunity. And while Republicans deserve much
of the blame, Democrats like Daniel Moynahan and Bill Clinton were
often as bad, sometimes worse.
Henry Farrell: [02-27]
Dr. Pangloss's Panopticon: A very thoughtful critique of Noah Smith's
"quite
negative review of a recent book by Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson,
Power and Progress: Our 1000-Year Struggle Over Technology &
Prosperity. There are complex issues at dispute here, many
much more interesting than those that dominate this (and all recent)
posts. Dr. Pangloss (from Voltaire) stands in for techno-optimism:
the idea that unfettered innovation, accelerated as it is through
modern venture capitalism, promises to deliver ever-improving worlds.
Panopticon (from Jeremy Bentham) is an early form of mass surveillance,
a capability that technology has done much to develop recently, with
AI promising a breakthrough to the bottleneck problem (the time and
people you need to surveil other people).
Luke Goldstein: [02-23]
Crunch time for government spying: "Congress has a few weeks left
until a key spying provision sunsets. Both reformers and intelligence
hawks are plotting their strategies."
Oshan Jarow: [03-08]
The world's mental health is in rough shape -- and not getting any
better: "Guess where the US ranks?"
Sarah Kaplan: [03-06]
Are we living in an 'Age of Humans'? Geologists say no.
A recent proposal for delineating a stratigraphic boundary for
the Anthropocene, based on "a plume of radioactive plutonium
that circled around the world" in 1952, was proposed recently
and, at least for now, voted down. More:
Alvaro Lopez: [03-08]
The making of Frantz Fanon: Review of Adam Shatz's new book,
The
Rebel's Clinic: The Revolutionary Lives of Frantz Fanon.
Also:
Rick Perlstein: [03-06]
The spectacle of policing: "'Swatting' innocent people is the latest
incarnation of the decades-long gestation of an infrastructure of
fear."
Dave Phillipps: [03-06]
Profound damage found in Maine gunman's brain, possibly from blasts:
"A laboratory found a pattern of cell damage that has been seen in
veterans exposed to weapons blasts, and said it probably played a
role in symptoms the gunman displayed before the shooting." Robert
Card was a grenade instructor in the Army Reserve for eight years.
He went on to shoot and kill 18 people and himself. Something not
yet factored into the "Costs of War" accounting. Another report:
Jeffrey St Clair: [03-08]
Roaming Charges: Too obvious to be real.
I ran across a link to this David Brooks [02-08]:
Trump came for their party but took over their souls. A normal
person would have little trouble writing a column under that headline.
Even Brooks hits some obvious points, like: "Democracy is for
suckers"; "Entertainment over governance"; and "Lying
is normal." But the one that really upsets Brooks is: "America
would be better off in a post-American world." The other maxim
that Brooks castigates Trump for is "Foreigners don't matter."
This leads to his rant against "isolationism," which inevitably
devolves into invoking the spectre of Neville Chamberlain.
Brooks celebrates the triumph of Eisenhower over Taft in 1952,
when "the GOP became an internationalist party and largely remained
that way for six decades" -- glorious years that spread capitalist
exploitation to the far corners of the globe, transforming colonies
into cronies ruled by debt penury, policed by "forever wars" and,
wherever the occasion arose, ruthless counterrevolutions and civil
wars.
Meanwhile, instead of enjoying the wealth this foreign policy
generated, America's middle class -- the solid burghers and union
workers who, as Harry Truman put it, "voted Democratic to live like
Republicans" -- got ground down into their own penury. The Cold
War was always as much about fighting democracy at home as it was
about denying socialism abroad, much as the "war on terror" was
mostly just an authoritarian tantrum directed against anyone who
failed to submit to America's globe-spanning military colossus.
Sure, it is an irony that blows Brooks' mind that it now seems
to be the Republicans -- the party that most celebrates rapacious
capitalism, is most devoutly committed to authoritarian rule, and
whose people are most callously indifferent to the cries of those
harmed by their greed -- should be the first give up on the game.
Of course, they weren't. The left, or "premature antifascists"
(as the OSS referred to us in the 1940s, before "communists and
fellow travelers" proved to be a more effective slur), knew this
all along, but that insight came from caring about what happens
to others, and solidarity in what we sensed was a common struggle.
It took Republicans much
longer to realize that globalized capitalism, under the aegis of
American military power, not only didn't work for them personally,
but that it directly led to jobs moving overseas, and all kinds
of foreigners flooding America. And since Republicans had put
so much propaganda effort into stoking racism and reaction, not
least by blaming Democrats (with their "open borders" and focus
on wars as "humanitarian") for loving foreigners more than their
own people.
I was pointed to Brooks' piece by a pair of
tweets: Simon Schama linked, adding: "Heartfelt obituary by
David Brooks for the expiring of last vestiges of the Republican
Party. No longer has supporters but 'an audience.' Lying normalised.
Total abandonment of internationalism." To which, Sam Hasselby added:
People have really memory-holed the whole Iraq catastrophe which
is in fact what normalized a new scale of lying and impunity in
American politics. It was also a lie which cost $7 trillion dollars,
killed one million innocent Iraqis, and displaced 37 million people.
Yet Iraq War boosters like Brooks still have major mainstream
media gigs, while Adam Schiff trounced Barbara Lee (the only member
of Congress to vote against the whole War on Terror) in a Democratic
primary, and Joe Biden became president -- finally giving up the
20-year disaster in Afghanistan, only to wholeheartedly embrace
new, but already even more disastrous, wars in Ukraine and Gaza.
Ask a question, or send a comment.
Tuesday, March 5, 2024
Music Week
March archive
(in progress).
Music: Current count 41938 [41900] rated (+38), 21 [22] unrated (-1).
I'm having a rough time getting anything done, which is my best
explanation for wasting most of last week on a still-unfinished
Speaking of Which -- posted well after midnight last, with
a few further adds flagged today. The most important add is the
link to Pankaj Mishra's
The Shoah after Gaza (also on
YouTube).
I've neglected pretty much everything and everyone else. My
apologies to anyone expecting a response from me. As I must have
noted already, I gave myself a month to write a quick, very rough
draft of my long gestating political book, with the promise that
if I couldn't pull it off, I'd shelve the idea once and for all,
and spend my waning days reading fiction -- forty years later,
I still have a bookmark 300 pages into Gravity's Rainbow,
and enough recollection I'm not sure I'll have to retrace --
while slipping in the occasional old movie and dawdling with
jigsaw puzzles (ok, I'm already doing the latter). I certainly
wouldn't have to plow through any nonfiction that might be
construed as research -- e.g., a couple items currently on
the proverbial night stand: Franklin Foer's book on Biden, or
Judis/Teixeira on the missing Democrats.
That month was supposed to be January, but the Jazz Critics
Poll and EOY lists lapped over without me starting, so I decided
I'd give it February. I still have no more than a fragment of a
letter stashed away in a
notebook entry, so
the obvious thing to do at this point is admit failure, and be
done with it. Aside from easing my mind -- the last six months
have been unbearably gloomy for my politics, my prognostications
turning markedly dystopian -- ditching politics might be good
news for those of you more interested in my writing on music.
Two small projects that I've also neglected are: a thorough
review of the
Francis Davis Jazz
Critics Poll website, which is missing some unknown quantity
of historical material (hopefully Davis has it stashed away),
and needs some modernization; I'm also behind on maintenance,
not to mention the long-promised redesign, of the
Robert Christgau
website. It would also make sense to reorganize my own data
along those same lines, as even now it's virtually impossible
for even me to look up what I've written about any musician.
I also have neglected house projects: the most pressing of
which is the imminent collapse of a chunk of ceiling in my wife's
study room. I used to be pretty competent at carpentry and home
improvement tasks. About all I can claim to have managed in the
last month has been replacement of two light bulbs, which took
me weeks (in my defense, both involved ladders and unconventional
sockets).
Nothing special to say about this week's music. A copy of the
year 2023 list has been
frozen, but I am
still adding occasional records to my
tracking file,
jazz and
non-jazz EOY lists, and
EOY aggregate, but mostly
just my own belatedly graded items. But I'm not very focused on what
I'm listening to, and often get stuck wondering what to play next.
I can't say I've reached the point of not caring, but I'm getting
there.
My most played record of the last couple weeks is The
R&B No. 1s of the '50s, especially the final disc, which
has left me with Lloyd Price's "I'm Gonna Get Married" as the
ultimate earworm. I should probably bump the whole set up to full
A. I played the last three discs while cooking on Saturday, and
I'm satisfied with them. Then I started Sunday and Monday with
disc 6. As this post lapsed into Tuesday, I was tempted again,
but had unfinished Vijay Iyer queued up.
Found this in a Facebook comment: "I'm not sure keeping up with
Tom Hull is possible. The very thought makes my synapses cry out,
'no mas, no mas.'" But from my view, they really just keep coming
poco a poco. During the long delay from listing out this file to
posting it -- mostly spent on the Speaking of Which intro -- I only
managed to collect four more reviews for next week: two marginally
A- jazz albums (Joel Ross, John Surman), and two more marginally
below A- (Vijay Iyer, Emile Parisien).
New records reviewed this week:
Black Art Jazz Collective: Truth to Power (2024,
HighNote): Fourth group album, 2016 debut started with six mostly
prominent mainstreamers -- Wayne Escoffery (tenor sax), Jeremy Pelt
(trumpet), James Burton (trombone), Xavier Davis (piano), and
Johnathan Blake (drums) -- up to nine this time: still a sextet,
but with Victor Gould, Rashaan Carter, and Mark Whitfield Jr.
taking over at piano-bass-drums for four tracks. Rich harmonically,
but still not much of interest happening here.
B [sp]
The Choir Invisible [Charlotte Greve/Vinnie Sperazza/Chris
Tordini]: Town of Two Faces (2022 [2024], Intakt):
Brooklyn-based trio of German saxophonist Charlotte Greve, Chris
Tordini (bass), and Vinnie Sperazza (drums), the group taking
the title of their initial 2020 album. Greve is also credited
with voice, but the real vocal here is Fay Victor's outstanding
blues, "In Heaven."
B+(***) [sp]
Djeli Moussa Condé: Africa Mama (2023, Accords
Croises): Kora playing griot from Conakry, Guinea; at least two
previous albums, more as Kondé.
B+(***) [sp]
Gui Duvignau/Jacob Sacks/Nathan Ellman-Bell: Live in
Red Hook (2022 [2024], Sunnyside): Bassist, fourth album
since 2016, born in France, moved to Morocco as an infant, then
grew up in Brazil, eventually winding up in New York, where he
recorded this trio with piano and drums.
B+(*) [sp]
Alon Farber Hagiga With Dave Douglas: The Magician: Live
in Jerusalem (2023 [2024], Origin): Israeli saxophonist
(soprano/alto), group name is Hebrew for "celebration," has used
it to frame his quintet and sextet albums since 2005, up to seven
here with their guest star, who brought two (of five) songs, and
plays some of his hottest trumpet since he left Masada. A group
this joyous deserves as better country.
B+(***) [cd]
R.A.P. Ferreira & Fumitake Tamura: The First Fist to
Make Contact When We Dap (2024, Ruby Yacht): Underground
rapper from Chicago, initials for Rory Allen Philip, formerly did
business as Milo, based in Nashville; producer has a handful of
collaborations since 2014. Music very sketchy here, but finds an
interesting groove. Twelve cuts, 32:16.
B+(***) [sp]
David Friesen: This Light Has No Darkness (2023
[2024]], Origin): Bassist, one should add composer as that's been
key to him leading fifty-some albums since 1975, and that's the
focus here, with this 12-part work arranged and orchestrated by
Kyle Gordon, using a 33-piece orchestra. Classically lush, way
too much for my taste.
B [cd]
The Fully Celebrated Orchestra: Sob Story (2023
[2024], Relative Pitch): Group led by alto saxophonist Jim Hobbs,
first appeared as a trio in 1996, last heard on the terrific 2009
Drunk on the Blood of the Holy Ones, back here as a quintet,
with Taylor Ho Bynum (cornet) and Ian Ayers (guitar) joining Luther
Gray (drums) and original member Timo Sharko (bass).
B+(**) [sp]
Vanisha Gould and Chris McCarthy: Life's a Gig
(2022 [2024], Fresh Sound New Talent): Jazz singer, has a previous
self-released duo album but I could see this as her debut, wrote
one song plus lyrics to another, but the focus here is on seven
standards, most with just McCarthy's piano accompaniment (guest
viola on two: the original and "Jolene"). Given the right song,
like "What a Little Moonlight Can Do," and she doesn't need more.
B+(**) [sp]
Heems & Lapgan: Lafandar (2024, Veena Sounds):
Rapper Himanshu Suri, formerly of Das Racist and Swet Shop Boys,
third solo album (first since 2015). Lapgan is a producer with a
couple recent albums, draws on Indo-Pak heritage, Lollywood dance
beats, and transnational hip-hop. Beaucoup guests celebrate, and
flaunt, diversity. I should dig up a lyric sheet, but the many
word juxtapositions are exciting enough.
A [sp]
Katy Kirby: Blue Raspberry (2024, Anti-): Folkie
singer-songwriter, grew up in Texas, based in Nashville, second
album.
B+(**) [sp]
Lapgan: History (2023, Veena Sounds): Hip-hop
producer, most likely Punjabi but no info as yet on how far
removed (seems to be based in Chicago), breakthrough is with
the new Heems album, which instantly validated this title.
B+(*) [sp]
Lapgan: Duniya Kya Hai (2021, Veena Sounds):
Earlier, beats "almost exclusively with sounds from India and
Pakistan."
B+(**)
Lapgan: Badmaash (2019, self-released): Digging
deeper, I find his name is Gaurav Nagpal (last name reversed for
Lapgan), his parents came from India (but where? samples are as
likely to come from Kerala as Punjab), he was born in Queens,
grew up near Chicago, and worked his way backwards into roots.
B+(**) [sp]
Les Amazones d'Afrique: Musow Danse (2024, Real
World): African supergroup, three brand-name Malian singers --
Mamani Keïta, Mariam Dumbia, Oumou Sangare -- plus 'French
music-industry veteran" Valerie Malot.
B+(***) [sp]
James Brandon Lewis Quartet: Transfiguration
(2022 [2024], Intakt): Tenor saxophonist, brilliant on his 2014
major label debut, has continued to impress ever since, including
landmark concept albums that won the Francis Davis Poll in 2021
and 2023. On the side, he's recorded a series of excellent working
group albums for this Swiss label. Quartet with piano (Aruán Ortiz),
bass (Brad Jones), and drums (Chad Taylor).
A- [sp]
Cecilia Lopez & Ingrid Laubrock: Maromas (2022
[2023], Relative Pitch): Electronics musician, from Argentina, based
in New York, more than a dozen releases since 2015, doesn't appear
to be related to bassist Brandon Lopez, but they did a 2020 duo
called LopezLopez. Duo here with the German saxophonist
(soprano/tenor), also New York-based. Sketchy, but interesting.
B+(**) [sp]
Corb Lund: El Viejo (2024, New West): Canadian
country singer-songwriter, twelfth album since 1995. Has a good
sound and good sense, but songs are a bit hit-and-miss (a tip
might be that his best album so far was called Songs My Friends
Wrote).
B+(***) [sp]
Brady Lux: Ain't Gone So Far (2024, 6483357 DK, EP):
Country singer-songwriter from Montana, reportedly "a genuine ranch
hand cowboy who works his ass off every day, and at night he writes
songs and saws a little fiddle when he can find the time." Sounds
really western, albeit without horses. Seven songs, 23:05.
B+(***) [sp]
Mali Obomsawin/Magdalena Abrego: Greatest Hits
(2024, Out of Your Head): Singer-songwriter/bassist from Abenaki
First Nation, started in the folk group Lula Wiles, released a
jazz-powered solo debut in 2022 I liked a lot (Sweet Tooth),
but title here made me wonder. Abrego is a guitarist based in
Hudson, NY, with not much before this, but adds appreciable heft
to the songs. Eight songs, 32:02.
B+(**) [bc]
QOW Trio: The Hold Up (2024, Ubuntu Music):
British trio -- Riley Stone-Longeran (tenor sax), Eddie Myer
(bass), Spike Wells (drums) -- second album after an eponymous
debut in 2020, basically a retro-bop band, name taken from a
Dewey Redman song, Wells old enough to have played with Tubby
Hayes. No complaints here if the saxophonist sounds a lot like
Sonny Rollins.
A- [sp]
Zach Rich: Solidarity (2021 [2024], OA2):
Trombonist, originally from Wichita, teaches in Colorado,
seems to be his first album. Postbop quintet with piano and
guitar, bass and drums, plus string quartet, plus extra horns
and voice on the second piece ("Broken Mirrors").
B+(*) [cd]
Dex Romweber: Good Thing Goin' (2023, Propeller
Sound): Rockabilly/roots guitarist, singer-songwriter, surprised
to hear that he died at age 56, leaving this album has his last --
ominously dedicated to his late sister and duo partner, Sara
Romweber (1963-2019). A mix of originals and covers, the latter
more often amusing (even if inadvertently so).
B+(*) [sp]
Ignaz Schick/Oliver Steidle: Ilog3 (2021 [2023],
Zarek): Germans, Schick started out as a saxophonist but credits
here are "turntables, sampler, pitch shifter/looper," in a duo
with the drummer ("percussion, sampler, live-electronics"). Third
duo album, starting in 2015. Some splendid noise.
B+(***) [bc]
Fie Schouten/Vincent Courtois/Guus Janssen: Vostok:
Remote Islands (2023, Relative Pitch): A treat for
Worldle devotees,
improvised music "inspired by Judith Schalansky's book Atlas
of Remote Islands: 50 Islands I Never Set Foot in and Never
Will. Schouten plays "bass clarinet, clarinet in A, basset
horn"; the others cello and keyboards, with Giuseppe Doronzo
joining in on baritone sax (4 of 12 tracks). Eleven are named
for islands (only a couple big enough to be Worldle answers),
the other for a bird ("Inaccessible Island Rail").
B+(**) [sp]
Håkon Skogstad: 8 Concepts of Tango (2023 [2024],
Øra Fonogram): Norwegian pianist, has taken tango as his art form,
with previous albums called Visions of Tango and Two Hands
to Tango. All original pieces here, played by a classical-sounding
group of band (piano, two bandoneons, string quartet plus bass).
B+(*) [cd] [03-15]
Sleater-Kinney: Little Rope (2024, Loma Vista):
Portland-based rock group, now down to a duo of singer-songwriters
Carrie Brownstein and Corrin Tucker, eleventh studio album since
1995. I've long respected their craft while finding one or both
of the voices intensely grating. Still, repeated exposure finds
me caring less than ever, although this has less than usual for
me to complain about.
B [sp]
Simon Spiess Quiet Tree: Euphorbia (2022 [2024],
Intakt): Swiss tenor saxophonist, debut 2011, eighth album,
group includes pianist Marc Méan (who wrote four pieces, same
as Spiess), and drummer Jonas Ruther (writer of one piece).
This sort of sneaks up on you.
B+(**) [sp]
Albert Vila Trio: Reality Is Nuance (2022 [2023],
Fresh Sound New Talent): Spanish guitarist, half-dozen albums
since 2006, this a trio recorded in Brussels with Doug Weiss (bass)
and Rudy Royston (drums). Nice, low-key feel, drummer excels.
B+(**) [sp]
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries:
Roberto Magris: Love Is Passing Thru: Solo/Duo/Trio/Quartet
(2005 [2024], JMood): Italian pianist, from Trieste, many albums
since 1990, has been rifling through old tapes recently, and has
come up with an exceptionally delightful one here. Recorded over
two dates. This works out to five solo tracks (including two takes
of "Lush Life"), plus two with drums and percussion (Enzo Carpentieri,
some Balinese), three more with bass (Danilo Gallo), and finally
three with tenor sax (Ettore Martin).
A- [cd]
Jack Wood: The Gal That Got Away: The Best of Jack Wood,
Featuring Guest Niehaud Fitzgibbon ([2024], Jazz Hang):
A classic crooner, "long a favorite in Southern California."
No dates given here, but "some of the Wood's finest recordings,"
with various groups, including Doug MacDonald and John Pisano
on guitar, some sweetened by the Salt Lake City Jazz Orchestra.
The featured guest is an Australian singer, who takes over for
two tracks, and is as adept as her host. I must admit that I
still have a soft spot for the style, especially on the songs
that it made timeless.
B+(***) [cd] [03-29]
Old music:
Gigi: Gigi (2001, Palm Pictures): Ethiopian singer
Ejigayehu Shibabaw, third album, got a boost on Chris Blackwell's
label, produced by Bill Laswell, with a roster of jazz greats
(Wayne Shorter, Herbie Hancock, Pharoah Sanders, Henry Threadgill,
Hamid Drake, Amina Claudine Myers) mixed in with Laswell regulars
and many Ethiopians. Laswell and Gigi married, following this up
with a dub remix, then Zion Roots, credited to Abyssinia
Infinite, with Gigi's full name as "featuring."
B+(***) [sp]
Gigi: Illuminated Audio (2003, Palm Pictures):
Some sort of dub remix of Gigi, omitting most of the vocals,
which was the Gigi part of the album. Also cuts out the jazz solos,
so you wind up with a lot of Bill Laswell ambient groove -- not
much, but pleasant enough.
B+(*) [sp]
Gigi: Gold & Wax (2006, Palm Pictures): Her
third, and final, album for Chris Blackwell's label, again with
Bill Laswell producing. A wide range of musicians -- including
Nils Petter Molvaer, Bernie Worrell, Aiyb Dieng, Foday Musa Suso,
Ustad Sultan Khan, and Buckethead -- integrate seamlessly with
the mesmerizing vocals.
A- [sp]
Barney McAll: Precious Energy (2022, Extra
Celestial Arts): Australian pianist, close to twenty albums since
1995, seems to have designed this to appeal to his featured guest,
alto saxophonist Gary Bartz, although the more critical collaborator
may be jazz-soul outfit Haitus Kayote. This starts with a Leon
Thomas/Pharoah Sanders homage, and ends with Coltrane, while
touching on planets Sun Ra and Stevie Wonder. That was Bartz's
golden age, but barely registers here over the zonked out vocals.
B [sp]
Pajama Party: Up All Night (1989, Atlantic):
Dance-pop vocal trio, released two albums, this debut and another
in 1991.
B+(**) [sp]
QOW Trio: QOW Trio (2020, Ubuntu Music): English
sax-bass-drums trio -- Riley Stone-Lonergan, Eddie Myer, Spike
Wells -- title song/group/album name from Dewey Redman, also dok
one from Joe Henderson, several standards (three from Cole Porter),
and two originals not far removed from their inspirations ("Pound
for Prez," "Qowfirmation").
B+(***) [sp]
Stacey Q: Greatest Hits (1982-95 [1995], Thump):
Dance-pop artist, Stacey Swain, opens with five resplendent remixes
of singles from her 1986 solo debut, then ignores two later albums,
going back to her early work in Q -- a "minimal synth/new wave"
group with Jon St. James and Ross Wood, and then SSQ (supposedly
emphasizing the singer's initials).
B+(***) [sp]
SSQ: Playback (1983, Enigma): Stacey S[wain]'s
pre-solo group, produced by guitar/synth player (and sometime
vocalist) Jon St. James, both previously in the band Q, first
and only album until a 2010 return.
B+(**) [sp]
SSQ: Jet Town Je T'Aime (2020, Synthicide):
A return to form for Stacey Swain and Jon St. James, 37 years
after their first (and hitherto only) album.
B+(*) [sp]
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Guillermo Gregorio: Two Trios (ESP-Disk) [2023-12-01]
- Mercer Hassy Orchestra: Duke's Place (Mercer Hassy) [04-15)
- Ellie Lee: Escape (self-released) [05-24]
- Matthew Shipp Trio: New Concepts in Piano Trio Jazz (ESP-Disk) [04-05]
- Ronny Smith: Struttin' (Pacific Coast Jazz) [04-19]
Ask a question, or send a comment.
prev -- next
|