Monday, October 23. 2017
Music: Current count 28799  rated (+18), 398  unrated (-4).
As predicted (feared), another short week with many distractions.
Next week looks pretty similar, which means October's Streamnotes will
very likely be the year's shortest -- lowest monthly count so far is
111 in May (114 in March, 115 in April, 119 in August; top count was
156 in January, followed by 153 in February, 149 in June, 144 in
September). Current draft has 59 records, so that extrapolates to
about 83. I'd need a week (plus a day) with 52 reviews to match my
previous lowest monthly total this year.
Only three non-jazz albums below: Corey Dennison's blues album
actually came in the mail; Wooden Wand was suggested by a tweet
(actually an earlier album, not on Napster, so I tried the new
one); Twitter also led me to the latest release by Awesome Tapes
From Africa -- possibly the only label I actually follow
I haven't made a serious attempt to survey new non-jazz released
in a couple months, so I have very little idea what to look for.
Still, quite a few jazz albums in the queue, and many more I'm not
serviced on. Unfortunately, I'm finding fewer than 50% of the new
jazz I look for. I expect this will add up to my poorest coverage
level since I started Jazz Consumer Guide in 2004.
New records rated this week:
- Borderlands Trio [Stephan Crump/Kris Davis/Eric McPherson]: Asteroidea (2015 , Intakt): [cd]: A-
- Dee Dee Bridgewater: Memphis . . . Yes, I'm Ready (2017, Okeh): [r]: B+(**)
- Kyle Bruckmann's Degradient: Dear Everyone (2017, Not Two, 2CD): [r]: B+(**)
- Bobby Bradford/Hafez Modirzadeh: Live at the Magic Triangle (2016 , NoBusiness): [cdr]: B+(**)
- Corey Dennison Band: Night After Night (2017, Delmark): [cd]: B+(***)
- Mark Dresser: Modicana (2016-17 , NoBusiness): [cdr]: B+(**)
- Bob Ferrel: Bob Ferrel's Jazztopian Dream (2016 , Bob Ferrel Music): [cd]: B+(*)
- Ghost Train Orchestra: Book of Rhapsodies Vol II (2012-17 , Accurate): [cd]: B+(*)
- Ross Hammond + Jon Bafus: Masonic Lawn (2016 , Prescott): [r]: B+(***)
- Hans Hassler: Wie Die Zeit Hinter Mir Her (2015 , Intakt): [cd]: B+(*)
- Ahmad Jamal: Marseille (2017, Jazz Village): [r]: B+(**)
- Rudresh Mahanthappa's Indo-Pak Coalition: Agrima (2017, self-released): [cdr]: A-
- Alma Micic: That Old Feeling (2017, Whaling City Sound): [cd]: B+(**)
- Mike Stern: Trip (2017, Heads Up): [r]: B+(*)
- Wooden Wand: Clipper Ship (2017, Three Lobed): [r]: B
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries rated this week:
- Professor Rhythm: Bafana Bafana (1995 , Awesome Tapes From Africa): [r]: A-
- Ton-Klami [Midori Takada/Kang Tae Hwan/Masahiko Satoh]: Prophecy of Nue (1995 , NoBusiness): [cd]: B+(***)
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Sheryl Bentyne: Rearrangements of Shadows: The Music of Stephen Sondheim (ArtistShare)
- The Billy Lester Trio: Italy 2016 (Ultra Sound): November 3
- Roy McGrath: Remembranzas (JL Music): November 7
- Kyle Motl Trio: Panjandrums (Metatrope): November 6
- Gabriele Tranchina: Of Sailing Ships and the Stars in Your Eyes (Rainchant Eclectic)
- Mark Wingfield/Markus Reuter/Asaf Sirkis: Lighthouse (Moonjune): November
Sunday, October 22. 2017
I didn't get a head start on this -- in fact, started after dinner on
Sunday, so it's pretty quick and dirty, with a limited set of sources.
Still, it's so easy to find such appalling stories that posts like this
practically write themselves.
Some scattered links this week:
Matthew Yglesias: 4 political stories that actually mattered this week:
We got a bipartisan insurance stabilization deal: thanks to Sens.
Patty Murray (D-WA) and Lamar Alexander (R-TN), but: Republican leaders
don't seem to want a deal, like Paul Ryan, with Trump both waxing and
waning; The administration tested some new tax arguments, like
"corporate tax cuts boost wages" and "math forces tax cuts for the rich";
Nobody knows what's happening with NAFTA, hence no real story here,
but Trump's folks are blowing some smoke. Other Yglesias pieces this week:
The raging controversy over Trump and the families of fallen soldiers,
explained: well, more like summarized, as it's hard to explain how
tone-deaf Trump is in human interactions as straightforward (albeit no
doubt unpleasant) as issuing condolences.
Yet Trump has managed to completely and utterly botch this relatively
simple job less than a week after creating a major diplomatic crisis
with Iran for no particular reason. The humanitarian crisis in Puerto
Rico appears to be, if anything, intensifying as citizens cope with a
chronic lack of safe water. The president has willfully destabilized
individual health insurance markets without any clear plan and is
actively scuttling congressional efforts to stabilize the situation.
Other serious challenges are lurking out there in the world, yet the
Trump administration seemed incapable of issuing a simple condolence
statement or answering a question about it without unleashing a
multi-front political fiasco.
Trump aide says manufacturing decline increases abortions, death, and drug
abuse: "He might be right." Reviews research on "China shock" -- what
happens to areas hard hit by job losses due to cheaper imports. You can
blame this on trade deals, but it's also indicative of the frayed safety
net all across the country.
Republians say they can't figure out how to not cut taxes for the
rich: "It's really not very hard." If, say, you wanted to lower
rates on the first $100k of income, that would reduce taxes on those
who make more too, but you could offset that by increasing the rate
further up the income scale. Or you could do it lots of other ways.
And don't bother cutting the estate tax, something no one in the
middle class has to pay -- that's only a benefit for the very rich.
Trump says a big corporate tax cut will boost average incomes by $4,000
Sarah Aziza: How Long Can the Courts Keep Donald Trump's Muslim Ban at
Bay? Two federal judges issued injunctions against the third iteration
of Trump's travel ban last week.
Julia Belluz: White House officials think childhood obesity is not a
problem. Have they seen the data? Their campaign to wipe out
Obama's legacy (in this case, Michelle Obama's) continues apace.
Aida Chavez: House Republicans Warn Congress Not to "Bail Out" Puerto
Jason C Ditz: What Are U.S. Forces Doing in Niger Anyway?: Four US
Special Forces were killed in an ambush a couple weeks ago, finally
pointing a spotlight on US intervention there (much like the Benghazi
Turns out that for five years Niger has been a toe in the expanding
American footprint in Africa, and has become a hub of U.S. military
activity (about 800 soldiers are serving as advisors and training
local forces there now) and, according to Nick Turse, the location
of a brand new $100 million drone base. Meanwhile, the region has
become a crossroads of Islamist activity, from Boko Haram in Nigeria
to al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb across the Sahel. And now,
apparently, ISIS. . . .
Niger is far from the exception. In March 2012, the Pentagon
confirmed that U.S. troops were attacked in the southern Yemeni
city of Aden, and that a CIA officer was killed. This was the
first time officials confirmed that the U.S. had ground troops
operating inside Yemen at all. The revelation is even more stunning
when one recalls that the White House publicly ruled out sending
ground troops to Yemen several times in the years leading up to
More war news from around the world:
Lee Fang/Nick Surgey: Koch Brothers' Internal Strategy Memo on Selling
Tax Cuts: Ignore the Deficit: After all, deficits only matter when
a Democrat is president and might use deficits for expanding services
and/or growing the economy -- things Republicans oppose and, especially,
want to make sure no Democrat gets credit for. But when Republicans are
in power, well, as Dick Cheney said, "deficits don't matter."
Sarah Kliff: Medicare X: the Democrats' supercharged public option plan,
explained: Specifically, Sens. Bennet and Kaine, a plan that makes
less sense than Bernie Sanders' Medicare-for-all but would involve less
turmoil by adding a Medicare-based plan to the Obamacare exchanges as a
public option, increasing competition for private insurance plans.
Paul Krugman: Lies, Lies, Lies, Lies, Lies, Lies, Lies, Lies, Lies,
Lies: A propos of the Trump's "new" arguments for slashing taxes,
Modern conservatives have been lying about taxes pretty much from the
beginning of their movement. Made-up sob stories about family farms
broken up to pay inheritance taxes, magical claims about self-financing
tax cuts, and so on go all the way back to the 1970s. But the selling
of tax cuts under Trump has taken things to a whole new level, both in
terms of the brazenness of the lies and their sheer number. Both the
depth and the breadth of the dishonesty make it hard even for those of
us who do this for a living to keep track.
He then comes up with a list of ten (see the article for details,
although you're probably familiar with most of them already):
- America is the most highly-taxed country in the world
- The estate tax is destroying farmers and truckers
- Taxation of pass-through entities is a burden on small business
- Cutting profits taxes really benefits workers
- Repatriating overseas profits will create jobs
- This is not a tax cut for the rich
- It's a big tax cut for the middle class
- It won't increase the deficit
- Cutting taxes will jump-start rapid growth
- Tax cuts will pay for themselves
One thing that's missing in this debate is what do we need taxes for.
Some people argue that taxes should be limited to a certain percentage
of GDP -- often the same people who don't understand why government
spends more now than it did under Coolidge or McKinley. I think it's
obvious that a lot of things that we need in today's economic world
are necessarily more expensive than they were in past eras (especially
things that didn't really exist back then). To figure this out, one
needs some kind of multifactor analysis, and I think especially one
has to ask what things are most efficiently produced and distributed
through public channels. I think this list is large and growing, and
may include things that surprise you. If this list is as large as I
think, we need to be looking not at ways to cut taxes but at ways to
grow them, and how to do so fairly and efficiently. As it is, the
relentless focus on cutting taxes is an attack on public spending,
and ultimately on the public taxes are meant to serve.
Jane Mayer: The Danger of President Pence: A profile of the
vice president, one which raises plenty to be alarmed about, not
least because his odds of being elevated to the presidency via
the 25th amendment (the one that says all it takes is a majority
of the cabinet to find Trump incompetent -- perhaps something
Trump should have considered before giving Pence so much say in
picking nominees). For more on the 25th, see
Jeannie Suk Gersen: How Anti-Trump Psychiatrists Are Mobilizing
Behind the Twenty-Fifth Amendment.
Anna North: A detained 17-year-old immigrant wants an abortion. The
government went to court to stop her. Here's a case where the
Trump administration isn't being run like a business -- try finding
an angle where it makes sense for the government to prevent a detained
emigrant from obtaining an abortion -- but more like a shady religious
cult. For more cultlike behavior:
Doe is not the only minor who's been affected by the policy, according
to the ACLU. In March, according to court documents filed by the group,
another minor at a shelter in Texas chose to have a medication abortion
after getting a judge's permission for the procedure. After she had
taken the first dose of the medication, ORR officials forced her to go
to an emergency room to see if the abortion could be reversed. Ultimately,
she was allowed to proceed with the abortion and take the remaining dose
of the medication. In another case, the ACLU said, Lloyd traveled from
Washington, DC, to meet personally with a young woman to try to convince
her not to have an abortion.
Jon Schwartz: It Didn't Just Start Now: John Kelly Has Always Been a
Hard-Right Bully: The former Marine General has had a tough week,
not only failing repeatedly to keep Trump from embarrassing himself,
but having his own Trumpian moment making baseless charges against
Rep. Frederica Wilson. The best Trump mouthpiece Sarah Sanders came
up with in Kelly's defense was
It's "highly inappropriate" to question John Kelly -- because he's a
general. Schwartz compresses "Kelly's worldview, as expressed in
2010" into this short list:
- No one outside of the military can legitimately question any
of America's wars.
- No one who is in the military ever questions any of
- America and its wars are and have always been good.
- America is under terrifying threat from incomprehensible
- Our country is hamstrung by its sniveling "chattering class."
I've run across many more links on Kelly and Wilson, but I'd rather
point out this one:
Alice Speri: Top Trump Official John Kelly Ordered ICE to Portray
Immigrants as Criminals to Justify Raids.
Matt Shuham: Forbes: Trump Drops on 'Richest Americans' List as Net Worth
Takes a Hit: Down $600 million to $3.1 billion, dropping 92 spots
(from 156 to 248). No real analysis here as to why. Certainly, it's not
because he's resolved his conflicts-of-interest and made it impossible
to use his office to feather his own nest. And this looks extra bad with
the stock market setting new record highs. On the other hand, leaving
his day-to-day business decisions in the hands of Jr. and Eric may not
ave been the smartest idea. And naming so many properties after himself
has politicized them, which makes their value at least partly subject
to his extraordinarily low popularity.
Monday, October 16. 2017
Music: Current count 28781  rated (+15), 402  unrated (+1).
Second short-count week in a row, following a +17 last week. No
surprise for me, as we played host for a visiting friend from Boston.
I spent one day cooking a nice dinner -- Moroccan, main dish was cod
marinated in chermoula and baked over potatoes and tomatoes; sides
were a roasted eggplant salad, roasted red bell peppers with goat
cheese, a carrot salad, an olive-orange-onion salad, and a sweet
potato-olive salad; dessert was a mixed fruit salad with honey and
orange blossom water. Next day we drove out to Quivira NWR, Cheyenne
Bottoms, and back through Lindsborg. Ate at Country Crossing in Yoder
on the way out, and Swedish Crown in Lindsborg on the way back. Third
day we drove around Wichita, dining at Molino's (Mexican). Anyhow,
knocked about half of my week out, and I never really got back into
I did manage a small bit of progress on the Jazz Guides. I'm up to
51% in the
Jazz 2000's file, which
puts me at Julian Lage, and gives me 1197 pages. One metric I've been
using suggests that I have 157 pages to go (1354 total), but that
doesn't account for group entries that I've set aside -- probably
another 50-75 pages. The 20th Century Guide is still stuck at 749
pages, so I'm 54 short of 2000 combined. That'll probably be a
milestone to mark with a
later this week.
One minor note on the list below. I was reminded of the Mose Allison
Christgau had given an A- to, by its conspicuous (albeit alphabetical)
Phil Overeem's latest list. The record isn't available on Napster, but
I was able to line up 23/24 songs, and figured that's close enough. Not
quite as good as I'd like, although I could imagine the booklet and a few
more plays pushing it over the line. One thing I'm pretty sure of is that
I could assemble an A- compilation, although I've yet to find any available
record that quite makes the grade.
I expect I'll get closer to 30 records next week, although I'm likely
to run into a few distractions. Also having trouble figuring out what to
listen to on Napster, although my own new jazz queue is pretty deep right
now, so there's that.
I should also note that some space has opened up on the server, so for
a while I should be back to normal there. Still think I should move it all,
but the immediate need is less urgent.
Laura Tillem had a nit to pick with my outrage at Trump and Tillerson
for withdrawing the US from UNESCO yesterday. She blamed Obama. I'm not
sure of the exact chronology or responsibility, but in 2011 the US stopped
paying dues to UNESCO because they admitted Palestine as a full member.
This was evidently mandated by a law passed by Congress -- I don't know
whether it was signed by Obama, but wouldn't be surprised if it was. In
2012, Obama asked Congress to restore funding for UNESCO, and was turned
down. In 2015 UNESCO passed a resolution that Israel took offense to --
something having to do with Jerusalem -- and at some point UNESCO designated
the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron as a World Historical site, and made
the faux pas of designating it as part of Palestine. But disagreements
happen with international organizations. What I was more concerned with
was the American refusal to participate and engage, which is consistent
and largely dictated by neocon (imperialist) doctrine. Indeed, it should
be pointed out that Israel didn't announce that it's leaving UNESCO until
after the US did, supposedly on its behalf. I might also note that the
US-Israeli decision casts further doubt that either nation has any real
commitment to "the two-state solution," which has been official policy,
at least in the US, at least since the early 1990s. If the US actually
supported its own policy, you'd expect it to help establish international
recognition of a Palestinian state even before Israel formalized the deal.
Instead, since GW Bush the US has routinely subordinated its own policies
and interests to Israel -- a blank check surrender which Obama and Trump
There is, I think, an interesting book to be written about how the
critique of internationalism and, especially, the UN, has grown from
a fringe cult like the 1950s John Birch Society into a hegemonic idea
that dictates American foreign policy, affecting both parties.
New records rated this week:
- Rez Abbasi: Unfiltered Universe (2016 , Whirlwind): [cd]: B+(**)
- Ellery Eskelin: Trio Willisau Live (2015 , Hatology): [r]: A-
- Andrew Lamb/Warren Smith/Arkadijus Gotesmanas: The Sea of Modicum (2016 , NoBusiness): [cdr]: B+(*)
- Rob Luft: Riser (2017, Edition): [r]: B
- Liudas Mockunas: Hydro (2015-16 , NoBusiness): [cdr]: B+(**)
- Mostly Other People Do the Killing: Paint (2017, Hot Cup): [cd]: B+(***)
- Johnny O'Neal: In the Moment (2017, Smoke Sessions): [r]: B+(*)
- Teri Parker: In the Past (2016 , self-released): [cd]: B+(**)
- Wadada Leo Smith: Najwa (2014 , TUM): [cd]: A-
- Wadada Leo Smith: Solo: Reflections and Meditations on Monk (2014-15 , TUM): [cd]: B+(**)
- Yosvany Terry/Baptiste Trotignon: Ancestral Memories (2017, Okeh): [r]: B+(*)
- Charles Thomas: The Colors of a Dream (2017, Sea Tea): [cd]: B+(*)
- Lizz Wright: Grace (2017, Concord): [r]: B+(***)
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries rated this week:
- Mose Allison: I'm Not Talkin': The Soul Stylings of Mose Allison 1957-1971 (1957-71 , BGP): [r]: B+(***)
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Ernesto Cervini's Turboprop: Rev (Anzic)
- Corey Christiansen: Dusk (Origin): October 20
- Richie Cole: Latin Lover (RCP): October 20
- Marc Devine Trio: Inspiration (ITI): October 13
- Sinne Eeg: Dreams (ArtistShare)
- ExpEAR & Drew Gress: Vesper (Kopasetic): November 15
- Lorenzo Feliciati: Elevator Man (RareNoise): advance, November 17
- Satoko Fujii Quartet: Live at Jazz Room Cortez (Cortez Sound): October 20
- Adam Hopkins: Party Pack Ice (Ad-Hop Music)
- Lisa Mezzacappa: Glorious Ravage (New World)
- Diana Panton: Solstice/Equinox (self-released)
- Roswell Rudd/Fay Victor/Lafayette Harris/Ken Filiano: Embrace (RareNoise): advance, November 17
- Idit Shner: 9 Short Stories (OA2)
Sunday, October 15. 2017
Every week since January has featured multiple stories about how
Donald Trump (and/or the Republicans) are corrupting government,
undermining democracy, degrading our short- and long-term economic
prospects, and quite often endangering world peace. Still, most of
those stories could be understood as some combination of the greed,
demagoguery, and narrow-minded ignorance that constitutes what passes
as the conservative world-view. But some things happened this week
that makes me think Trump has crossed a previously unknown line into
a qualitatively new level of, well, I'm groping for words, trying to
avoid "evil," so let's call it derangement. The US withdrawal from
UNESCO was the first such story, followed by the trashing of the
agreement with Iran to terminate their "nuclear program," but then
there was Trump's executive order to undermine Obamacare -- an act
of pure spite following the Republican failure to repeal the ACA.
As Ezra Klein's tweet explains:
Trump's new policy will increase premiums by 20%, cost the government
$194 billion, increase the deficit, destabilize insurance markets, and
increase the number of uninsured Americans. There is nothing it makes
better; it's pure policy nihilism.
Sure, I've often felt like Republicans generated their policy ideas
from a deep well of spite and vindictiveness, with scant concern for
consequences because deep down they really didn't give a shit about
anyone other than themselves (actually, a small subset of the fools
they manipulating into voting for them). But usually you could also
discern a positive slant, like their fondness for helping predatory
businesses rip everyone else off. Trump certainly isn't beyond that,
especially for his own businesses, but he mostly leaves such matters
to his subordinates -- after all, their experience in business and
lobbies gives them a command of detail he lacks, as well as motives
he doesn't disapprove of.
That's should have left Trump free to focus on "big picture" items,
but not understanding them either, he's been preoccupied with petty
feuds and tone-deaf publicity stunts, but his hatred for Obama is so
great that he'll gladly sign any executive order that wipes out any
hint of his predecessor's legacy. That's the source of much of his
policy nihilism, although he's occasionally broken new ground, as
with his UNESCO withdrawal -- ending 72 years of more/less trying to
work with the rest of the world's nations for the common good.
I suppose what this really means is that for the first time since
he took office, I've come around to the view that Trump is actually
worse than the run-of-the-mill Republicans in Congress and now in his
cabinet and office. I've long resisted that view, partly because the
media bend over backwards to excuse and legitimize the latter, and
partly because even though I disapprove of Trump's obvious character
flaws (e.g., racism, sexism, xenophobia, vanity, violence, mendacity,
ostentatiousness, sheer greed) I prefer to judge people on what they
do rather than what they think or believe. (Indeed, those flaws are
pretty common in America, but most people have enough of a superego
to try to limit their exposure and maintain social decorum -- Trump,
as is becoming more obvious every day, does not.)
On the other hand, let's not forget that Trump started to wander
off after giving his little rant about Obamacare, and it was Mike
Pence who grabbed him by the sleeve and dragged him back to actually
sign the executive order. That's an image to keep in mind if, say,
Trump is finally dispatched as too much of an embarrassment -- and
here I have to agree with Steve Bannon that the odds favor a cabinet
coup using the 25th amendment to Congress taking the more arduous
road to impeachment.
Some scattered links this week:
Aaron Blake: Almost half of Republicans want war with North Korea, a new
poll says. Is it the Trump Effect? Actually, a plurality, 46-41% in
favor of a preemptive strike against North Korea. Other polls produce
different results, possibly depending on how the question is phrased.
I doubt if even 1% of the Republicans polled have any understanding of
North Korea's preparations for responding to such an attack, hence of
the risks and likely costs of starting a war there. On the other hand,
one may expect Mattis, Tillerson, and the upper ranks of the uniformed
to at least have some idea: thousands of pieces of artillery that can
reach Seoul (population 10 million, metro area 25 million), the range
of rockets that can reach further (up to the US mainland), a few dozen
nuclear warheads (some with hydrogen boost), the vast array of defensive
tunnels, one of the largest military forces in the world. The latest
assessment I've seen is that the US would prevail in such a war (assuming
China does not intervene, as it did in 1950), but it wouldn't be easy
and the costs would be great. Tillerson was recently quoted as saying
he'll continue negotiating "until the first bomb falls" -- it's hard
to take much comfort in that given that Trump's been quoted as saying
his Secretary of State is wasting his time. Moreover, see
Choe Sang-Hun: North Korean Hackers Stole U.S.-South Korean Military
Plans, Lawmaker Says, including a "decapitation plan" for an
attack targeting Kim Jong-Un. Also note the report that
Trump Wanted Tenfold Increase in U.S. Nuclear Arsenal -- while
beyond ridiculous, such a report would play directly into North Korea's
paranoia. Indeed, Trump is playing Nixon's
Madman theory much more convincingly than the Trickster ever did.
(For a recent review, see
Garrett M Graff: The Madman and the Bomb. Among other things, this
article points out how elated Trump was in ordering the "Mother of All
Bombs" dropped in Afghanistan, adding "All the previous worries about
the potential of a deranged president to use a nuclear button irrationally
have been multiplied.") Lately Trump has made a number of bold unilateral
moves, evidently meant to reassure his base that he can act dramatically
on their prejudices. The more he senses support for striking North Korea,
the more likely he is to do it.
Tina Brown: What Harvey and Trump have in common: Harvey is Weinstein,
the movie mogul and current poster boy for serial sexual abuse. Brown left
her job at The New Yorker to work for him, and this is what she
What I learned about Harvey in the two years of proximity with him at
Talk was that nothing about his outward persona, the beguiling Falstaffian
charmer who persuaded -- or bamboozled -- me into leaving The New Yorker
and joining him, was the truth. He is very Trumpian in that regard.
He comes off as a big, blustery, rough diamond kind of a guy, the kind
of old-time studio chief who lives large, writes big checks and exudes
bonhomie. Wrong. The real Harvey is fearful, paranoid, and hates being
touched (at any rate, when fully dressed).
Winning, for him, was a blood sport. Deals never close. They are
renegotiated down to the bone after the press release. A business meeting
listening to him discuss Miramax deals in progress reminded me of the wire
tap transcripts of John Gotti and his inner circle at the Bergin Hunt and
Fish Club in Queens. "So just close it fast, then fuck him later with the
subsidiary rights." . . .
Harvey is an intimidating and ferocious man. Crossing him, even now,
is scary. But it's a different era now. Cosby. Ailes. O'Reilly, Weinstein.
It's over, except for one -- the serial sexual harasser in the White House.
For more Weinstein dirt, see
Ronan Farrow: From Aggressive Overtures to Sexual Assault: Harvey
Weinstein's Accusers Tell Their Stories. As for Trump, see:
Jessica Garrison/Kendall Taggart: Trump Given a Subpoena for All Documents
Relating to Assault Allegations.
Daniel José Camacho: Trump's marriage to the religious right reeks of
hypocrisy on both sides: Well, sure, but hypocrisy is an old friend
of Christianity in every stage of American history, and you can probably
find prime examples at least as far back as Constantine, who realized
how useful the religion could be for sanctifying his own political power.
Christianity is, above all else, a remarkably forgiving religion, as
long as you attest to its power by begging for its mercy. In country
music, for instance, whatever you do on Saturday Night can be atoned
for and made right on Sunday Morning, and the latter is all that really
matters to the clergy -- after all, confession confirms their authority.
The political right has never had a problem with that. They love the
idea of hierarchy so much they strive to emulate it on earth, ruled,
of course, by themselves, conferring favors upon their favored clergy.
Of course, if you don't buy into this arrangement, your cynicism may
lead you to charge them with hypocrisy. Indeed, the whole scam is as
easy to see through as "The Emperor's New Clothes," but that only makes
the believers more angry and vindictive -- hence, the rise of the
Religious Right parallels liberal secularization, with its increasing
militancy (and, looking at Trump, I'm inclined to add desperation)
bound up with a feeling of embattled isolation that right-wing media
and politicians have cynically encouraged. Still, the problem is less
Christian backlash against secular culture -- something that is real
but deeper and more complex than the political backlash it is often
confused with[*] -- than that con artists from Reagan to Trump have often
managed to wrap their scams up in various traditional pieties, as if
that excuses otherwise shameless behavior.
[*] Note that Christianity predates capitalism, so contains a strain
of anti-materialist sentiment that has never been fully reconciled with
modern commerce. It even predates Constantine's state religion, before
which it was resolutely anti-state and anti-war, so even today a large
segment of the peace movement finds its inspiration in religion (and
not just Christianity).
William D Hartung: Here's Where Your Tax Dollars for 'Defense' Are Really
The answer couldn't be more straightforward: It goes directly to private
corporations and much of it is then wasted on useless overhead, fat
executive salaries, and startling (yet commonplace) cost overruns on
weapons systems and other military hardware that, in the end, won't
even perform as promised. Too often the result is weapons that aren't
needed at prices we can't afford. If anyone truly wanted to help the
troops, loosening the corporate grip on the Pentagon budget would be
an excellent place to start.
The numbers are staggering. In fiscal year 2016, the Pentagon issued
$304 billion in contract awards to corporations -- nearly half of the
department's $600 billion-plus budget for that year. And keep in mind
that not all contractors are created equal. According to the Federal
Procurement Data System's top 100 contractors report for 2016, the
biggest beneficiaries by a country mile were Lockheed Martin ($36.2
billion), Boeing ($24.3 billion), Raytheon ($12.8 billion), General
Dynamics ($12.7 billion), and Northrop Grumman ($10.7 billion). Together,
these five firms gobbled up nearly $100 billion of your tax dollars,
about one-third of all the Pentagon's contract awards in 2016. . . .
The arms industry's investment in lobbying is even more impressive.
The defense sector has spent a total of more than $1 billion on that
productive activity since 2009, employing anywhere from 700 to 1,000
lobbyists in any given year. To put that in perspective, you're talking
about significantly more than one lobbyist per member of Congress, the
majority of whom zipped through Washington's famed "revolving door";
they moved, that is, from positions in Congress or the Pentagon to
posts at weapons companies from which they could proselytize their
The weapons systems are the big ticket items, but there is much more,
including some 600,000 private contractors doing all sorts of things,
with little effective management, while companies like Erik Prince's
Blackwater lobby to privatize more combat jobs.
Sean Illing: 20 of America's top political scientists gathered to discuss
our democracy. They're scared. Many interesting idea here; e.g.:
Nancy Bermeo, a politics professor at Princeton and Harvard, began her
talk with a jarring reminder: Democracies don't merely collapse, as that
"implies a process devoid of will." Democracies die because of deliberate
decisions made by human beings.
Usually, it's because the people in power take democratic institutions
for granted. They become disconnected from the citizenry. They develop
interests separate and apart from the voters. They push policies that
benefit themselves and harm the broader population. Do that long enough,
Bermeo says, and you'll cultivate an angry, divided society that pulls
apart at the seams. . . .
Due to wage stagnation, growing inequalities, automation, and a
shrinking labor market, millions of Americans are deeply pessimistic
about the future: 64 percent of people in Europe believe their children
will be worse off than they were; the number is 60 percent in America.
That pessimism is grounded in economic reality. In 1970, 90 percent
of 30-year-olds in America were better off than their parents at the
same age. In 2010, only 50 percent were. Numbers like this cause people
to lose faith in the system. What you get is a spike in extremism and
a retreat from the political center. That leads to declines in voter
turnout and, consequently, more opportunities for fringe parties and
candidates. . . .
Consider this stat: In 1960, 5 percent of Republicans and 4 percent
of Democrats objected to the idea of their children marrying across
political lines. In 2010, those numbers jumped to 46 percent and 33
percent respectively. Divides like this are eating away at the American
social fabric. . . .
But for all the reasons discussed above, people have gradually
disengaged from the status quo. Something has cracked. Citizens have
lost faith in the system. The social compact is broken. So now we're
left to stew in our racial and cultural resentments, which paved the
way for a demagogue like Trump.
One thing I would stress here is that "the erosion of democratic
norms" -- voter suppression, gerrymandering, obstruction tactics,
tolerance for "dirty tricks," the ever-increasing prerogatives of
money -- has largely been spawned within the Republican Party, which
is to say the party most desperately committed to inequality, order,
privilege, and hierarchy. The article offers stats about the growing
number of Americans who look favorably on a military dictatorship,
but neglects to break them down by party. Still, it's worth noting
that Democrats have often played into the hands of anti-democratic
forces, especially those who have been most successful at toadying
for donors. Although Obama, for instance, campaigned against the
baleful influence of money in 2008, he managed to raise so much more
of it than McCain, so Democrats didn't bother to use their majorities
to address the issue.
Sarah Jaffe: Bernie Sanders Isn't Winning Local Elections for the Left:
"Bernie Wins Birmingham" is convenient shorthand for those who have no idea
what actually goes on in Birmingham. But Bernie Sanders and the group his
2016 campaign inspired, Our Revolution, are not winning elections in places
like Birmingham or Jackson, Mississippi, which in June elected a mayor who's
promised, "I'll make Jackson the most radical city on the planet." Activists
in Birmingham and Jackson and Albuquerque and Long Island are winning them --
left-wing activists who've toiled for years in the trenches, working with a
new wave of organizers from Black Lives Matter and other insurgent groups,
who bring social-media savvy and fired-up young voters into the mix.
Still, the title leans too hard the opposite way. Bernie is helping,
especially to provide a nationwide support framework. Conversely, helping
build local power bases helps build the nationwide movement, either for
Bernie (who certainly could have used some local help in Mississippi and
Alabama during the 2016 primaries) or whoever vies most successfully for
his movement. Conversely, although Hillary may have given up her dream
of running in 2020, her crowd is still more focused on containing (or
combatting) the left than on winning elections: see
Bob Moser: Clintonian Democrats Are Peddling Myths to Cling to Power.
Anyone who bothers to remember McGovern's tragic 1972 loss to Nixon
should heap shame on those Democrats who betrayed their party's nominee
for the most devious and crooked politician in American history -- much
more numerous than the tiny fraction of Sanders supporters who couldn't
stomach Clinton in 2016. The so-called New Democrats have discredited
themselves doubly: first by repeatedly surrendering the Party's New
Deal/Great Society legacy to increasingly regressive Republicans in the
name of political expediency, then by losing to the vilest candidate
the GOP could muster.
Fred Kaplan: Certifiable Nonsense: As usual with Slate, the link
title is better: "President Trump's Most Dishonest Speech Yet," adding
"His announcement on the Iran deal might also be his most dangerous
speech yet." Certainly true about his dishonesty, even though there's
lots of competition. But most dangerous? More dangerous than his
taunting of North Korea, which actually has nuclear warheads as well
as more powerful missiles? Well, the two are related:
Pulling out would also damage our posture, and possibly trigger catastrophe,
in other global hot spots. If our face-off with North Korea is to end without
war, it will require some sort of diplomatic settlement. But who will want
to negotiate with the United States, and who would believe any deal Trump
would sign or guarantee he would make, if he pulls out of the Iran deal,
even though Iran is abiding by its terms?
Sarah Kliff: Trump's acting like Obamacare is just politics. It's people's
lives. This is the piece Klein linked to in his tweet above, so it
starts by spelling out the bottom line. One key thing Trump's order does
is to end payments to insurance companies protecting against losses due
to adverse selection. This wouldn't be a problem in a single-payer system
with truly universal coverage, but splitting the market into multiple
segments means that some will be cost more than others. If insurance
companies had to bear that risk, some would drop out and the rest would
raise their prices. And that's exactly what they will do under Trump's
Ending these payments raises premiums for anyone who uses Obamacare:
older people, younger people, sicker people, and healthy people. And
it puts an already fragile Obamacare marketplace at greater risk of
a last-minute exodus by health plans who assumed that the government
would pay these subsidies -- and don't think they can weather the
The Trump administration has, since taking office, cut the Obamacare
open enrollment period in half. Instead of 90 days to sign up, enrollees
will now get 45. The Trump administration has cut the Obamacare advertising
budget by 90 percent -- and reduced funding for in-person outreach by 40
percent. Regional branches of Health and Human Services abruptly pulled
out of the outreach events they have participated in over the last four
years. . . .
Trump's larger presidential agenda has focused on unwinding Barack
Obama's legacy. He's more focused on destroying his nemesis than trying
to replace, to fix, or to improve Obama's biggest accomplishments from
the Iran deal to environmental regulation.
On health care, there are going to be immediate and very real
consequences for Americans. There are real people who stand to be hurt
by an administration that has actively decided to make a public benefits
program function poorly.
Michael Kruse: The Power of Trump's Positive Thinking: Yet another
attempt to plumb Trump's psyche, trying to impose order on a mental
process that strikes most of us as supremely chaotic:
"I've had just about the most legislation passed of any president, in
a nine-month period, that's ever served," he said this week in an interview
with Forbes, contradicting objective metrics and repeating his
frequent and dubious assertion of unprecedented success throughout the
first year of his first term as president.
The reality is that Trump is in a rut. His legislative agenda is
floundering. His approval ratings are historically low. He's raging
privately while engaging in noisy, internecine squabbles. He's increasingly
isolated. And yet his fact-flouting declarations of positivity continue
unabated. For Trump, though, these statements are not issues of right or
wrong or true or false. They are something much more elemental. They are
a direct result of the closest thing the stubborn, ideologically malleable
celebrity businessman turned most powerful person on the planet has ever
had to a devout religious faith. This is not his mother's flinty Scottish
Presbyterianism but Norman Vincent Peale's "power of positive thinking,"
the utterly American belief in self above all else and the conviction that
thoughts can be causative, that basic assertion can lead to actual
achievement. . . .
What Peale peddled was "a certain positive, feel-good religiosity
that demands nothing of you and rewards you with worldly riches and
success," said Princeton University historian Kevin Kruse, the author
of One Nation Under God: How Corporate America Invented Christian
America. "It's a self-help gospel . . . the name-it-and-claim-it
gospel." . . .
Peale, then nearly 80 years old, officiated Trump's wedding in 1977.
In 1983, shortly after the opening of Trump Tower, Trump credited Peale
for instilling in him a can-do ethos.
The piece cites various critiques of various self-help pitches,
some of which fit Trump to a tee, then notes that no one who has
been studied has anywhere near the power Trump has, so "the Trump
presidency is uncharted territory." Of course, Peale is only one
significant influence on Trump's thinking and behavior. There's
also Roy Cohn, a very different and much more nefarious mentor.
And there's Trump's Nazi/KKK-aligned father, and probably a few
more. Some writer could build a great novel out of such clay.
Unfortunately, the real thing isn't a work of fiction.
Dara Lind: Leaked memos show Jeff Sessions's DOJ aims to undermine due
process for immigrants. Sessions is one of those "public servants" in
the Trump administration that's willing to overlook getting tweet-slapped
by Trump because he has important agenda work to do. This is one prime
example (others include ending civil rights and antitrust enforcement).
James Mann: The Adults in the Room: A piece on how the generals
(Kelly, Mattis, McMaster) and Boy Scout (Tillerson) Trump has surrounded
himself with are keeping the ship of state afloat, their "maturity" in
sharp contrast to the president's lack thereof:
Following the arrival of Donald Trump in the White House, the meaning
of the words "adult" and "grownup" has undergone a subtle but remarkable
shift. They now refer far more to behavior and character than to views
on policy. This is where Kelly, McMaster, Mattis, and (to a lesser extent)
Tillerson come in; "grownup" is the behavioral role that we have assigned
For the first time, America has a president who does not act like an
adult. He is emotionally immature: he lies, taunts, insults, bullies,
rages, seeks vengeance, exalts violence, boasts, refuses to accept
criticism, all in ways that most parents would seek to prevent in their
own children. Thus the dynamic was established in the earliest days of
the administration: Trump makes messes, or threatens to make them, and
Americans look to the "adults" to clean up for him. The "adults," in
turn, send out occasional little public signals that they are trying to
keep Trump from veering off course -- to educate him, to make him grow
up, to keep him under control. When all else fails, they simply distance
themselves from his tirades. Sometimes such efforts are successful; on
many occasions, they aren't.
Leaving aside the question whether Trump's immaturity is a matter
of his spoiled upbringing, sociopathy, or some kind of dementia (what
we usually mean when we speak of people his age undergoing "a second
childhood"), what I find most incongruous here is the notion that we
should consider generals to be grown-ups. We are, after all, talking
about people who dress up in uniforms with flashy medals, who prance
about and play with guns or, at their rank, maneuver soldiers around
battlefields. Those are all things that I enjoyed in my pre-teens but
rapidly grew out of, especially as I became conscious of the very grim
and senseless war my country was fighting in Vietnam. Ever since then,
I figured those who pursued military careers to be stuck in some kind
of adolescence, at least until PTSD disabuses them of their fantasies.
Maybe generals are different, although I don't see why, and I doubt
they often function well outside of the closed system that selected
them. (Tillerson, of course, didn't fall for the military fantasy, but
he got a taste of the worldview in the Boy Scouts, and his advancement
through the ranks of Exxon was every bit as cloistered -- something we
see in his performance as Secretary of State.)
I also couldn't help but notice this piece:
Eric Scigliano: The Book Mattis Reads to Be Prepared for War With
North Korea. The book is T.R. Fehrenbach's This Kind of War,
originally published in 1963, evidently focused on the importance of
putting "boots on the ground" while recognizing how little America's
scorched earth air bombardment had accomplished. No idea what lessons
Mattis draws from this, other than ego-stroking from a fellow Marine.
As I recall, the first thing I read about Mattis (back in early Iraq
War days) stressed what an intellectual he was, with his vast library
of war books. I flashed then on Robert Sherrill's book title, Military
Justice Is to Justice as Military Music Is to Music, and figured
"military intellectuals" were likely to be similarly debased.
Donald Macintyre: Tony Blair: 'We were wrong to boycott Hamas after its
election win': Only eleven years too late. I don't recall whether
Blair has issued his mea culpa for the Iraq War or any of the
dozens of other things he's famously screwed up, but it's worth noting
this one. One thing we should always work toward is getting groups to
lay down their arms and work to advance their cause through an electoral
framework. The Hamas electoral victory in 2006 offered an opportunity to
restart the "peace process" that Barak and Sharon aborted in 2000, with
broader Palestinian representation than was ever possible under Arafat.
Of course, Sharon wanted no part in any peace process, and Blair and
Bush sheepishly went along, not simply adding more than a decade to the
conflict but allowing Israel's illegal settlement actions to sink ever
deeper roots into the West Bank.
Andrew Restuccia: Bannon promises 'season of war' against McConnell, GOP
establishment: Specifically, "to challenge any Senate Republican who
doesn't publicly condemn attacks on President Donald Trump." On the one
hand, I'm tempted to say, "let the bloodletting begin"; on the other,
while it will be easy to characterize Bannon's insurgents as extremists,
his willingness to challenge oligarchy gives him a potential popularity
that establishment Republicans as Mitch McConnell lack. Bannon argues
here that "money doesn't matter anymore" -- while that's certainly not
true, his "grass roots organizing" was able to negate Hillary's huge
fundraising advantage. Seemingly unrelated, also note that:
[Bannon] also appeared to hint that the administration was planning to
soon declare that the Muslim Brotherhood is a terrorist organization
and move the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, perhaps as soon as
But a senior administration official disputed that such an announcement
was in the works for next week.
Philip Rucker/Ed O'Keefe: Trump threatens to abandon Puerto Rico recovery
effort: Among the many things Trump has threatened to blow up this
past week, one of the most vexing is the quasi-colonial relationship of
the US to Puerto Rico. Trump has vacillated between taking responsibility
for recovery and attempting to disown the island, to write it off like
one of his bad debts. Here he declares Puerto Rico's infrastructure a
disaster before the storm. There he lectures on the sanctity of debts
accured by state and local government there. Political sentiment in the
US generally favors aid, but I suspect his base is more antagonistic.
The banks, on the other hand, would probably prefer a bailout before
anything drastic happens. Puerto Ricans recently voted for statehood,
which Republicans in Congress are likely to block if they think there's
any reason -- like a racist, xenophobic president -- doing so might not
add to the GOP majority. Indeed, Trump has already started to follow
through on his threats to withdraw aid by allowing a temporary waiver
to the Jones Act to expire.
Meanwhile, a couple recent reports from Puerto Rico:
Gabriel Sherman: "I Hate Everyone in the White House!": Trump Seethes as
Advisers Fear the President Is "Unraveling":
Stephen Colbert's comment on this headline was: "This means up until
now, he's been raveled." Inside you get lines like "One former official
even speculated that Kelly and Secretary of Defense James Mattis have
discussed what they would do in the event Trump ordered a nuclear first
strike." And: "According to a source, Bannon has told people he thinks
Trump has only a 30 percent chance of making it the full term." All very
gossipy. Too much smoke to tell where the fire actually is.
Emily Shugerman: US withdraws from Unesco over 'anti-Israel bias':
"The US helped found Unesco in the wake of the Second World War, with
the aim of ensuring peace through the free flow of ideas and education."
I found this shocking, even though it's long been clear that the US has
its most anti-education and anti-free speech administration in history,
and possibly its most anti-peace one as well. The most disturbing thing
here is the extent to which anti-UN prejudice has permeated Republican
ideology (and make no mistake about it, this is a purely partisan view).
But even as a go-it-alone (i.e., isolationist) "America first" stance,
it's pretty self-deprecating: if the stated rationale is true, this as
much as admits that tiny Israel has taken charge of US foreign policy;
the alternative theory, that "Mr Tillerson simply wanted to stem outgoings,"
also reflects poorly on the US, as much as admitting that "the richest
country in the world" can't afford to contribute to preserving heritage
and supporting education in poorer countries.
Pieces by Matthew Yglesias this week:
Special bonus link:
Dalia Mortada: A Taste of Syria: A recipe for a Syrian dish, fatteh,
"a hearty dish of crispy pita bread beneath chickpeas and a luscious
garlic-yogurt-tahini sauce." I should note that the picture appears to
have a sprinkling of ground sumac (or maybe Aleppo pepper) not listed
in the recipe.
Monday, October 9. 2017
Music: Current count 28766  rated (+17), 401  unrated (-3).
Light week all around. I spent several days working on a fairly
extravagant dinner. I had checked out a copy of The Gefilte Manifesto:
New Recipes for Old World Jewish Foods from the local library, thinking
I'd try a few dishes before I had to check the book back in. I made fourteen
of them, counting some basic ones that got folded into other recipes (like
the Apple-Pear Sauce, which went into Grandma Fay's Applesauce Cake, and
the Everything Bagel Butter, perfect for spreading on the Seeded Honey Rye
Pull-Apart Rolls). The cookbook has recipes for basic DIY ingredients: the
one recipe I botched was the Sauerkraut, needed for Wine-Braised Sauerkraut
and Mushrooms, itself a component to the Braised Sauerkraut and Potato
Gratin. So I wound up buying Bubbies Sauerkraut for the Gratin, but my
Sauerruben came out perfect, so I think the Sauerkraut would have worked
if I had been more careful to keep the cabbage submerged.
While cooking, I went back to the travel cases, so I listened to a
lot of great music, even if I have little to report. In fact, the two
A- records below were things I wrote a bit about last week, so it was
all downhill from last Monday. After cooking, I wrote up recipes and
notes on the meal, but they're in the notebook. I haven't been able
to update the website, so you probably won't be able to find them.
(But note: I see a bit of disk space opened up, so maybe I can wrap
this up and get it up there before it closes again. If you see album
covers, that's a good sign I managed an update.)
Next week is likely to be short as well. We have a guest midweek,
so will be spending time with her -- showing off the town, and maybe
some of the countryside, and cooking a bit (Moroccan tomorrow night).
New records rated this week:
- Tony Allen: The Source (2017, Blue Note): [r]: B+(*)
- Blue Note All Stars: Our Point of View (2017, Blue Note, 2CD): [r]: B+(**)
- Open Mike Eagle: Brick Body Kids Still Daydream (2017, Mello Music Group): [r]: B+(**)
- Yedo Gibson/Hernâni Faustino/Vasco Trilla: Chain (2016 , NoBusiness): [cd]: B+(**)
- Gordon Grdina Quartet: Inroads (2017, Songlines): [cd]: B+(***)
- Dylan Jack Quartet: Diagrams (2017, Creative Nation Music): [cd]: B+(***)
- Pierre Kwenders: Makanda at the End of Space, the Beginning of Time (2017, Bonsound): [bc]: B+(*)
- Ian O'Beirne's Slowbern Big Band: Dreams of Daedelus (2016 , self-released): [cd]: B
- Wojciech Pulcyn: Tribute to Charlie Haden (2016 , ForTune): [bc]: B+(**)
- Tom Rainey Obbligato: Float Upstream (2017, Intakt): [cd]: A-
- Kamasi Washington: Harmony of Difference (2017, Young Turks): [r]: B+(*)
- Tal Yahalom/Almog Sharvit/Ben Silashi: Kadawa (2017, self-released): [cd]: B+(**)
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries rated this week:
- Chévere (2017, Parma): [cd]: B
Old music rated this week:
- Gordon Grdina's Box Cutter: New Rules for Noise (2007, Spool): [r]: B+(***)
- New Lost City Ramblers: Volume II: Out Standing in Their Field (1963-73 , Smithsonian/Folkways): [r]: A-
- Trevor Watts/Peter Knight: Reunion: Live in London (1999 , Hi 4 Head): [bc]: B+(**)
- Trevor Watts/Veryan Weston: Dialogues in Two Places (2011 , Hi 4 Head, 2CD): [bc]: B+(**)
Sunday, October 8. 2017
Very little time to work on this, but here are a few things I noted.
The big story of the week probably should be Puerto Rico, especially
how poorly America's quasi-benevolent gloss on colonialism has wound
up serving the people there, but that would take some depth to figure
out -- much easier to make fun of Trump pitching paper towels. Aside
from the Las Vegas massacre, the media's favorite story of the week
was Tillerson calling Trump a "fucking moron," then quasi-denying it,
followed by reports of his "suicide pact" with fellow embarrassed
secretaries Mattis and Mnuchim. Meanwhile the Caribbean cooked up
another hurricane, Nate, which landed midway between Harvey and
Irma, reported almost cavalierly after the previous panic stories.
How quickly even disaster becomes normalized these days!
Obviously, many more stories could have made the cut, if only I
had time to sort them out. Still, this is enough bad news for a taste,
especially since so much of it traces back to a single source.
Some scattered links this week:
Harry Enten: Trump's Popularity Has Dipped Most in Red States.
Thomas Frank: Are those my words coming out of Steve Bannon's mouth?
"My critique of Washington is distinctly from the left, and it's astonishing
to hear conservatives swiping it." I've long been bothered by how Frank's
taunting of the right-wing base got them to demand more from their political
heroes. It's also true that Frank's exposure of the neoliberal rot in the
heart of Washington's beltway has played into Trump rhetoric. Indeed, it's
probable that Frank's Listen, Liberal undercut Hillary much worse
than anything Bernie Sanders ever said or did -- a distinction that Hillary's
diehard fans don't make because most of Frank's readers supported Bernie.
Frank points out that Republicans offer no real fixes for his critiques.
So why don't Democrats pick up the same critique and flesh it out with
real solutions? Probably because Hillary and company were so content with
sucking up to their rich donors, but now that we know that doesn't work,
why can't they learn?
Josh Marshall: More Thoughts on the Externalities of Mass Gun Ownership:
This in turn cites
David Frum: The Rules of Gun Debate, which points out a basic truth
that hardly anyone wants to admit:
Americans die from gunfire in proportions unparalleled in the civilized
world because Americans own guns in proportions unparalleled in the
civilized world. More guns mean more lethal accidents, more suicides,
more everyday arguments escalated into murderous fusillades.
Marshall goes on to point out that the sheer popularity of guns is
making the problem worse for everyone -- he speaks of "externalities,"
although the game model is closer to an arms race. But Frum also notes:
o in a limited sense, the gun advocates are right. The promise of
"common sense gun safety" is a hoax, i.e. Americans probably will not
be able to save the tens of thousands of lives lost every year to gun
violence -- and the many more thousands maimed and traumatized -- while
millions of Americans carry guns in their purses and glove compartments,
store guns in their night tables and dressers. Until Americans change
their minds about guns, Americans will die by guns in numbers resembling
the casualty figures in Somalia and Honduras more than Britain or
It's truly hard to imagine that this change will be led by law. . . .
Gun safety begins, then, not with technical fixes, but with spreading
the truthful information: people who bring guns into their homes are
endangering themselves and their loved ones.
Specifically on Las Vegas, note
I'm not going to criticize Caleb Keeter -- the guitarist who "has
had a change of heart on guns."
Dylan Matthews: Trump reignites NFL protest controversy by ordering Mike
Pence to leave a Colts game: Pence showed up for a Colts game to
stand for the national anthem, then left in protest of players who took
a knee during the anthem. Pure PR stunt, and a huge insult to NFL fans,
who pay good money to watch the game, even if that means enduring the
pre-game pomp. Worse, Trump is so locked into his echo chamber he thinks
he's making a winning point.
Jeremy W Peters/Maggie Haberman/Glenn Trush: Erik Prince, Blackwater
Founder, Weighs Primary Challenge to Wyoming Republican: Billionaire
brother of Betsy DeVos, like her made his money inheriting the Amway
fortune but built a lucrative side business providing mercenaries for
the Global War on Terror, most recently in the news lobbying the Trump
administration to privatize the war in Afghanistan -- if you wanted to
write a new James Bond novel about a megalomaniacal privateer, you
wouldn't have to spruce his bio up much. He hails from Michigan, but
isn't the first to think Wyoming might be a cost-effective springboard
to the Senate and national politics (think Lynne Cheney). Behind the
scenes here is Steve Bannon, who's looking for Trump-like candidates
to disrupt the Republican Party. He's likely to come up with some
pretty creepy ones, but Prince is setting the bar awful high.
Andrew Prokop: Trump's odd and ominous "calm before the storm" comment,
not really explained: This followed Trump's dressing down of Secretary
of State Rex Tillerson for trying to talk to North Korea (not to mention
Tillerson's description of Trump as a "fucking moron"). As Prokop admits,
there is no real explanation for Trump's elliptical remarks, but as I see
it, he's doing a much more convincing act of Nixon's Madman Theory than
the Trickster ever managed.
David Roberts: Friendly policies keep US oil and coal afloat far more
than we thought.
Dylan Scott: How Trump is planning to gut Obamacare by executive
Matthew Yglesias: Puerto Rico is all our worst fears about Trump
To an extent, the United States of America held up surprisingly well
from Inauguration Day until September 20 or so. The ongoing degradation
of American civic institutions, at a minimum, did not have an immediate
negative impact on the typical person's life.
But the world is beginning to draw a straight line from the devastation
in Puerto Rico to the White House. Trump's instinct so far is to turn the
island's devastation into another front in culture war politics, a strategy
that could help his own political career survive.
One problem Trump has, even if it doesn't explain his administration
as a whole, has been the relative shortfall of news on Puerto Rico --
especially from the Trump whisperers at Fox (see
Druhmil Mehta: The Media Really Has Neglected Puerto Rico). A lot
of people, and not just immigration-phobes like Trump, have is seeing
Puerto Rico as part of the USA, even though everyone there has American
citizenship and are free to pick up and move anywhere in the country.
Harry Enten: Trump's Handling of Hurricane Maria Is Getting Really Bad
The notion that Trump hasn't done a lot of damage to the country
yet is mostly delayed perception. His regulatory efforts have allowed
companies to pollute more and engage in other predatory practices, but
it takes a while to companies to take advantage of their new license.
The defunding of CHIP (the Children's Health Insurance Program) didn't
immediately shot off insurance, but it will over several months. Those
who lose their insurance may not get sick for months or years, but
across the country these things add up. Trump's brinksmanship with
North Korea hasn't blown up yet, but it's made a disaster much more
likely. Some of these things will slowly degrade quality of life,
but some may happen suddenly and irreversibly. That people don't
notice them right away doesn't mean that they won't eventually.
One thing politicians hope, of course, is that bad things happen
they won't be traced back to responsible acts. Indeed, Republicans
have been extraordinarily lucky so far, to no small extent because
Democrats haven't been very adept as explaining causality. Yglesias
returns to this theme in
Trump's taste for flattery is a disaster for Puerto Rico -- and someday
The scary message of Puerto Rico -- like of the diplomatic row between
Qatar and Saudi Arabia before it -- is that a man who often seemed like
he wasn't up to the job of being president is, in fact, not up to the
job of being president.
At times, of course, his political opponents will find this comforting
or even to be a blessing. His inability to involve himself constructively
in the Affordable Care Act debate, for example, likely saved millions of
people's Medicaid coverage relative to what a more competent president
might have pulled off.
But when bad luck strikes, the president's problems become everyone's
problems. And in Puerto Rico we're seeing that the president's inability
to listen to constructive criticism -- and his unwillingness to incentive
people to give it to him -- transforms misfortune into catastrophe.
This tendency to cut himself off from uncomfortable information rather
than accept frank assessments and change course has impacted Trump's
legislative agenda, peripheral aspects of his foreign policy, and now
a part of the United States of America itself.
If we're lucky, maybe the global economy will hold up, we won't have
any more bad storms, foreign terrorists will leave us alone, and somehow
we'll skate past this North Korea situation. Maybe. Because if not, we're
going to be in trouble, and the president's going to be the last one to
Yglesias says "we'd better hope Trump's luck holds up," but he doesn't
sound very hopeful. I'm reminded of the famous Branch Rickey maxim, "luck
is the residue of design." Rickey was talking about winning baseball games,
but losing is the residue of its own kind of design. It was GW Bush's bad
luck that the economy imploded on his watch, but his administration and
his party deliberately did a lot of things that hastened that collapse,
so it's not simply that they were unlucky.
Other pieces by Yglesias last week:
The 4 stories that defined the week: Dozens were massacred in Las
Vegas; Trump flew to Puerto Rico; Tax reform is looking shaky; and
Morongate rocked the Cabinet. One aspect of the latter story: "due
to the structure of his compensation and certain quirks of tax law,
[Tillerson will] be hit with a $71 million tax bill on the proceeds
[of cashing out his Exxon stock] unless he stays with the government
for at least a year." Other pieces:
Meet Kevin Warsh, the man Trump may tap to wreck the American economy:
to replace Janet Yellen as chair of the Federal Reserve;
After Sandy Hook, Trump hailed Obama's call for gun control legislation;
Trump's reverse Midas touch is making everything he hates popular;
After a year of work, Republicans have decided nothing on corporate tax
Monday, October 2. 2017
Music: Current count 28749  rated (+30), 404  unrated (+6).
I wrapped up September's Streamnotes on Saturday. I couldn't update
the website, so the only workable link at present is
here. Inability to update means that eight cover pics of A- records
won't be found. Same for the seven A- records in the list below (only
one not in Streamnotes). Still no idea when I'll manage to straighten
this mess out. There are so many things to do I'm having trouble wrapping
my brain around it all.
The one new record was recommended by Phil Overeem, as he expanded
My Fav-O-Rite New and Old Records of 2017 list to 85. I'm not much
of a Cajun fan, but the latest Lost Bayou Ramblers album hits the spot.
I tried closing the week on Sunday, but found a couple more incoming
records on my messy desk, so I figured I should at least add them, and
wound up updating the rated totals as well. One thing I notices was that
I hadn't recorded the grade (A-) for Samo Salamon Sextet: The Colours
Suite, so most likely that didn't get registered in its appropriate
Music Week post. Things slowed down after posting on Saturday. I've been
playing new jazz in FIFO order, but decided to let the September Intakt
releases jump the line. Both -- an Irène Schweizer duo with Joey Baron
and a second record by Tom Rainey's Obbligato quintet -- are somewhat
less than I hoped for (well, expected), but still close enough I wound
up sinking a lot of time in them. Schweizer has a lot of drummer duos
on record, and the ones with Han Bennink and Pierre Favre are nothing
short of astonishing. I've long admired Baron, but he doesn't bring out
the same spark in the pianist. Rainey's record is tougher to decide --
I'm not really much good with subtle, and there's a lot of that here.
I tried to catch up with
Robert Christgau's recent
picks, and was most impressed by L'Orange. The 2015 album with Jeremiah
Jae had the special mix of sound and words that Christgau recognized,
but I was every bit as taken by the 2016 collaboration with Mr. Lif,
in part because its Orwellian dystopia seems amusingly quaint next to
the actual hell we're (mostly) living through. I woke up this morning
to news of last night's mass shooting in Las Vegas, with TPM offering
as its lead story:
White House: 'Premature' to Talk Gun Control in Wake of Las Vegas
Shooting. "Too late" would have been more like it, but with an
average of one mass shooting per day (273 times in the first 273
days of this year, counting 4+ people shot as a "mass shooting"),
timing doesn't really seem to be the question. (For a level-headed
summary of the facts:
German Lopez: Gun violence in America, explained in 17 maps and
I come from a family chock full of hunters, and I grew up with guns
in my home and in the homes of most of my relatives. My father took a
course on how to do taxidermy, so I also grew up surrounded by stuffed
dead animals -- they were my specialty at school show-and-tells (the
rattlesnakes were the biggest hits, but the badger and owl were the
stars). The Idaho relatives are more likely to have stuffed bear and
moose. One of them not only hunts; he makes his own antique rifles to
get back closer to the pioneer spirit. My father and most of his
generation served as soldiers, and that's still pretty common among
the Arkansas-Oklahoma relatives. So I'm not someone who gets riled
up easily over guns. Nor do I think it's government's job to protect
us from every possible harm -- especially self-harm (one of those
charts shows that guns kill many more people through suicide than
murder -- I'd like to see the same chart include accidents and
"justified" self-defense, which is surely the smallest slice of
the pie). Still, I do have a problem with stupid, and there's way
too much of that -- on both sides, but it's far from distributed
It's also important to realize that when people understand a
problem, they can if not fix at least ameliorate it. In this
regard, I noticed two tweets today. One pointed out that "The
Onion has run this story verbatim five times since 2014, switching
out only city, photo, and body count"
The story title: "No Way to Prevent This," Says Only Nation Where
This Regularly Happens." The other was The Onion's own tweet:
"Americans Hopeful This Will Be Last Mass Shooting Before They
Stop On Their Own For No Reason." Probably the single most obvious
point one can draw from the Las Vegas shooting is that it would
have been much less destructive had a federal law banning assault
weapons not been allowed to expire back when Bush was president.
(The latest count I've seen is 59 dead, 525 injured. That takes a
lot of bullets over a mere 15 minutes.) Sure, it's not like Congress
authorized the massacre, but that Congress could have prevented it
(and some lesser cases) had they maintained existing law. You can
blame them not doing so on NRA lobbying ($3,781,803 donations to
current members of Congress), but I think it has more to do with
continuous war since 2001, habituating us to the notion that all
we need to solve problems is more firepower.
I bring up the lapse of law because Congress has just allowed
several other important laws to expire, replacing them with nothing
but anarchy and cowardice. As Rep. Joe Kennedy III listed them:
- Healthcare for low-income kids
- Community health centers
- Loans for low-income college students
This story is unlikely to make the network news, especially on a day
with so much bloodshed, but over time they will affect many more lives
than the shooter in Las Vegas, and some of those effects will be dire.
Again, these are not new things that we cannot do. They are
things that we have been doing -- things that we actually should be
doing better -- but are stopping because we've elected a Congress that
can't be bothered even maintaining a semblance of civilization. (Isn't
there a quote somewhere, to the effect that taxes are what we pay for
civilization? One reason these laws are lapsing is that Congress is
preoccupied with slashing taxes -- no doubt figuring that if they
focus on helping the wealthy civilization will take care of itself.)
Speaking of dead people, Tom Paley and Tom Petty passed in the
last few days. [The Petty report may have been premature.] The
former was a founder of the legendary folk group New Lost City
Ramblers. Their early work, before Paley left in 1962, was their
best. The latter is a well known rocker, although the first image
that pops into my mind is the girl in Silence of the Lambs
singing along to "American Girl" in the car on her way to being
New records rated this week:
- Atomic: Six Easy Pieces (2016 , Odin): [r]: B+(**)
- Lena Bloch & Feathery: Heart Knows (2017, Fresh Sound New Talent): [cd]: B+(*)
- Collective Order: Vol. 2 (2017, self-released): [cd]: B+(*)
- Fat Tony: MacGregor Park (2017, First One Up, EP): [bc]: A-
- Four Tet: New Energy (2017, Text): [r]: B+(**)
- Eric Hofbauer: Ghost Frets (2016 , Creative Nation Music): [cd]: B+(***)
- Eric Hofbauer: Prehistoric Jazz Volume 4: Reminiscing in Tempo (2017, Creative Nation Music): [cd]: B+(***)
- L'Orange & Jeremiah Jae: The Night Took Us in Like Family (2015, Mellow Music Group): [bc]: A-
- L'Orange & Mr. Lif: The Life & Death of Scenery (2016, Mello Music Group): [bc]: A-
- Lost Bayou Ramblers: Kalenda (2017, Rice Pump): [r]: A-
- Matt Mitchell: A Pouting Grimace (2017, Pi): [cd]: B+(**)
- Chris Parker: Moving Forward Now (2017, self-released): [cd]: B-
- Rolling Blackouts Coastal Fever: The French Press (2017, Sub Pop, EP): [r]: B+(**)
- Irène Schweizer/Joey Baron: Live! (2015 , Intakt): [cd]: B+(***)
- Lyn Stanley: The Moonlight Sessions: Volume Two (2017, A.T. Music): [cd]: B+(***)
- Stik Figa: Central Standard Time (2017, Mello Music Group): [r]: B+(***)
- Summit Quartet: Live in Sant' Arresi (2016 , Audiographic): [bc]: B+(**)
- Fred Thomas: Changer (2017, Polyvinyl): [r]: B+(***)
- Nestor Torres: Jazz Flute Traditions (2017, Alfi): [cd]: B+(*)
- Trio Da Kali and Kronos Quartet: Ladilikan (2017, World Circuit): [r]: B+(*)
- Vector Families: For Those About to Jazz/Rock We Salute You (2017, Sunnyside): [r]: A-
- Ken Wiley: Jazz Horn Redux (2014 , Krug Park Music): [cd]: B+(*)
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries rated this week:
- Rolling Blackouts Coastal Fever: Talk Tight (2015 , Sub Pop, EP): [r]: A-
Old music rated this week:
- James Brown: Cold Sweat (1967, King): [r]: A-
- L'Orange & Stik Figa: The City Under the City (2013, Mello Music Group): [r]: B+(*)
- L'Orange & Kool Keith: Time? Astonishing? (2015, Mello Music Group): [bc]: B+(**)
- Fred Thomas: Everything Is Pretty Much Entirely Fucked (2002, Little Hands): [r]: B+(*)
- Fred Thomas: All Are Saved (2015, Polyvinyl): [r]: B+(**)
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Borderlands Trio [Stephan Crump/Kris Davis/Eric McPherson]: Asteroidea (Intakt): October 15
- Cowboys and Frenchmen: Bluer Than You Think (Outside In Music): October 13
- Jason Paul Curtis: These Christmas Days (self-released): November 24
- Jeff Dingler: In Transit (self-released)
- Hans Hassler: Wie Die Zeit Hinter Mir Her (Intakt): October 15
- Steve Hobbs: Tribute to Bobby (Challenge): January 8
- Bob Ferrel: Bob Ferrel's Jazztopian Dream (Bob Ferrel Music): October 6
- Danny Janklow: Elevation (Outside In Music)
- Alma Micic: That Old Feeling (Whaling City Sound)
- Nicole Mitchell and Haki Madhubuti: Liberation Narratives (Black Earth Music)
- Paul Moran: Smokin' B3 Vol. 2: Still Smokin' (Prudential): October 29
- Lewis Porter/Phil Scarff Group: Three Minutes to Four (Whaling City Sound)
- Adam Rudolph: Morphic Resonances (M.O.D. Technologies): October 20
- Samo Salamon/Szilárd Mezei/Achille Succi: Planets of Kei: Free Sessions Vol. 1 (Not Two)
- Marta Sánchez Quintet: Danza Imposible (Fresh Sound New Talent)
- The U.S. Army Blues: Swinging in the Holidays (self-released)
- Deanna Witkowski: Makes the Heart to Sing: Jazz Hymns (Tilapia)
- Mark Zaleski Band: Days, Months, Years (self-released): October 6
Sunday, October 1. 2017
Hard to get psyched up for this week, what with my website woes,
having sunk a lot of time into yesterday's Streamnotes, and various
other malaises. Two pieces of relative good news this week: the
Graham-Cassidy bill to repeal-and-decimate Obamacare failed to
advance to a vote; and HHS Secretary Tom Price, one of the Cabinet's
most obnoxious secretaries, was forced to resign. Hurricane Marie
is much reduced and well out to sea, heading toward Ireland, and
no new Atlantic hurricanes have been named. On the other hand, that
just leaves the destruction Marie wrought in Puerto Rico in the
media spotlight, with the Trump administration all but cursing the
Spanish-American War (wasn't that the first great MAGA crusade?).
Meanwhile, Republicans are pushing "tax reform" with no evident
ability to make their numbers add up.
Some scattered links this week:
Karen DeYoung, et al: Trump signed presidential directive ordering actions
to pressure North Korea: This included extensive cyberwarfare operations
against North Korea. Not clear on exact chronology, but this suggests that
much of the confrontation with North Korea was precipitated by Trump's
Anne Gearan: The swamp rises around an administration that promised to
Candidate Trump would have been appalled.
"A vote for Hillary is a vote to surrender our government to public
corruption, graft and cronyism that threatens the very foundations of
our constitutional system," Trump said during an Oct. 29 speech.
He went on to describe his broader belief that public corruption
and cronyism were eating away at voters' faith in government -- a
situation he would remedy.
"I want the entire corrupt Washington establishment to hear and to
heed the words I am about to say," Trump said. "When we win on Nov. 8,
we are going to Washington, D.C., and we are going to drain the
swamp." . . .
Trump's critics say no one should be surprised that he hasn't followed
through on his campaign promise. They argue that the mere idea of a
flamboyantly rich New York real estate mogul as the champion of workaday
lunch buckets in Middle America was silly.
"The tone on this stuff gets set at the top," said Brian Fallon,
spokesman for Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign and a former Justice
Department official in the Obama administration.
"Tom Price's wasteful jet-setting is not causing Trump embarrassment
because it violates any kind of reform mind-set within the Trump
administration. No such mind-set exists," Fallon said. "It is simply
because Price got caught and is reminding everyone of how Trump has
turned Washington into an even bigger swamp than it was in the first
Of course, it was ridiculous to ever think that Trump, let alone
a Congress run by Republicans, would so much as lift a finger to try
to curtail the influence of money in Washington or more generally in
politics. It was easy to tar Hillary on this account, given how much
she seemed to prefer courting donors to voters, given how brazenly the
Clintons had cultivated influence peddling (going back to Arkansas,
when he was Governor and she sat on the WalMart board), and given how
they had risen from bankruptcy to considerable wealth cashing in their
chips after he left office in 2001. But while Democrats from Grover
Cleveland to Barack Obama provided a measure of background corruption
in government, it was the self-styled "party of greed" that hosted our
most notorious corruption scandals: Grant's Credit Mobilier, Harding's
Teapot Dome, Reagan's HUD scandals and Iran-Contra, and too many squalid
affairs under Bush-Cheney to name. But never before have the Republicans
nominated someone as rapacious and as shameless as Trump. Tom Price ran
into trouble not by offending Trump's ethics but his ego, by acting like
he's entitled to the same perks as the boss. If anyone ever doubted that
"public corruption, graft and cronyism that threatens the very foundations
of our constitutional system," Trump will show them.
David A Graham: Why Does Trump Keep Praising the Emergency Response in
Puerto Rico? "The president's insistence that he's doing a great
job sits uneasily with stories of desperation in the aftermath of
Part of this seems to be Trump's struggle to project empathy, which he
displayed in the early days after Hurricane Harvey, where he excelled
at the inspirational, rah-rah, we will rebuild aspects of presidential
response, but found it very hard to show he felt the pain of Gulf Coast
residents. (By contrast, he has expressed caution about what to do in
Puerto Rico, tweeting, "The fact is that Puerto Rico has been destroyed
by two hurricanes. Big decisions will have to be made as to the cost of
its rebuilding!") Another part is Trump's tendency toward puffery: In
all situations, for his entire career, his impulse has been to magnify
and celebrate his own prowess and success, and so he's doing that here
too. But that fake-it-till-you-make-it approach understandably rankles
people like Yulín.
Damning as this is, it's way too kind to Trump, already forgetting
that he did a completely dreadful job of showing empathy in Texas --
although at least there he made a little effort to fake it. AT least
he acknowledges that Texas is part of "his" America, something that
he doesn't feel with Puerto Rico. A couple more sample pieces on how
the Trump administration is handling the Puerto Rico crisis:
Trump Attacks Critics of Puerto Rico Aid Effort: 'Politically Motivated
FEMA Administrator Swipes at San Juan Mayor, Those Who 'Spout Off' About
Sarah Kliff: Obamacare repeal isn't dead as long as Republicans control
Congress: In fact, lots of horrible things will keep coming up as
long as Republicans control Congress. A couple weeks ago my cousin asked
me who I'd like to see the Democrats nominate in 2020, and my response
was that it doesn't matter until Democrats can start winning state and
local races, especially for Congress. One thing I continue to fault both
Clinton and Obama on is their loss of Congress two years into their first
terms, and their failure to build up effective coattails even when they
won second terms. Hillary Clinton spent a ton of time raising money, but
didn't build up any down-ticket strength to build her own candidacy on --
a big part of the reason she lost. Without Congressional support, neither
Clinton nor Obama got more than a tiny percentage of their platforms
implemented, and that failure in turn ate at the credibility of their
promises -- something Hillary paid dearly for, which in turn is why
we're suffering through Trump and the Republican Congress.
Paul Krugman: Shifts Get Real: Understanding the GOP's Policy Quagmire:
I mentioned in the intro that Republican plans don't add up: they want
big cuts in tax brackets, especially for corporations from 35% to 20%,
and they want to eliminate the estate tax altogether, but even a few
of those things would bust the budget. "Reforms" to simplify the code
and eliminate current deductions could offset at least some of the cuts,
but those all look like tax increases to those who currently benefit,
and their lobbies are out in force to keep that from happening. Even
busting the budget is a problem given the Senate's no-filibuster
"reconciliation" path. So while everyone in the majority caucus is
sworn to cut taxes, getting there may prove difficult.
Right now it looks as if tax "reform" -- actually it's just cuts -- may
go the way of Obamacare repeal. Initial assessments of the plan are brutal,
and administration attempts to spin things in a positive direction will
suffer from loss of credibility on multiple fronts, from obvious lies
about the plan itself, to spreading corruption scandals, to the spectacle
of the tweeter-in-chief golfing while Puerto Rico drowns. . . .
One important goal of ACA repeal was to loosen those constraints, by
repealing the high-end tax hikes that paid for Obamacare, hence giving
a big break to the donor class. Having failed to do that, Rs are under
even more pressure to deliver the goods to the wealthy through tax cuts.
But deficits are a constraint, even if not a hard one. Now, Republicans
have always claimed that they can cut tax rates without losing revenue by
closing loopholes. But they've always avoided saying anything about which
loopholes they'd close; they promised to shift the tax burden away from
their donors onto [TK], some mystery group. It was magic asterisk city;
it was "Don't tax you, don't tax me, tax that fellow behind the tree" on
steroids. . . .
So what were they thinking? My guess is that they weren't thinking.
What we learned from health care was that after 8 years, Republicans
had never bothered to learn anything about the issues. There's every
reason to believe that the same is true for the distribution of tax
changes, which Paul Ryan called a "ridiculous" issue and presumably
nobody in his party ever tried to understand.
So now the lies and willful ignorance are catching up with them --
An earlier Krugman post
Unpopular Delusions and the Madness of Elites) notes some polling
There really is no clamor, even among Republicans, for tax cuts on the
wealthy and corporations. And overall public opinion is strongly against.
Nor is there a technocratic case for these cuts. There is no evidence
whatsoever that tax cuts produce great economic outcomes -- zero, zilch,
nada. The "experts" who claim otherwise are all hired guns, and notably
incompetent hired guns at that.
Yet faith in and demands for tax cuts remains; it's the ultimate zombie
idea. And it's obvious why: advocating tax cuts for the rich and inventing
rationales for those cuts is very lucrative.
Voodoo Gets Even Voodooier:
That said, Trumpcuts are an even worse idea than Reaganomics, and not
just because we start from much higher debt, the legacy of the financial
crisis, which cut deeply into revenue and temporarily boosted spending.
It also matters that we start from a much lower top tax rate than Reagan
did. . . . So even if you believed that voodoo economics worked under
Reagan -- which it didn't -- it would take a lot more voodoo, in fact
around 4 times as much, for it to work now.
Which makes you wonder: how can they possibly sell this as a
responsible plan? Oh, right: they'll just lie.
Peter O'Dowd: 18-Hour Vietnam Epic Is Lesson on Horror of 'Unleashing
Gods of War': Actually, the interview isn't that interesting, except
for a long quote on the Burns-Novick documentary from Daniel Ellsberg:
I think there were some some major omissions that are quite fundamental
that disturbed me quite a bit, although the overall thing is very
First of all, the repeated statement that this was a civil war on
which we were taking one side, I think it's profoundly misleading. It
always was a war in which one side is entirely paid, equipped, armed,
pressed forward by foreigners. Without the foreigners, no war. That's
not a civil war. And that puts -- it very much undermines, I'd say, a
fundamentally misleading statement at the very beginning in the first
five minutes or so of the first session.
I don't see anything in the Pentagon Papers, 7,000 pages, that could
be called good faith by anybody, in terms of the American people, our
values, our Constitution. This was a war, as I say initially, to keep
Vietnam a French colony. And that was not admitted to the American
people. It was well known inside. We preferred that they be at war,
and there was never a year that there would have been a war at all
without American money in the end. So I thought that was extremely
I'll probably write some more about Vietnam later, but I do want to
add one comment on the last episode, which features heavily the Vietnam
War Memorial in Washington DC. The design suggests a gash in the earth,
one side lined with black marble engraved with the names of 58,318
Americans who died perpetuating this war. I find it impossible to look
at this wall and not imagine extending it upward to include the three
million Vietnamese who also died. It seems extraordinarily conceited,
even more so misleading, to omit those names. Of course, if you want
to preserve the gash-in-the-earth visual effect, you could dig a deeper
hole instead of building the wall up hundreds of feet.
Alex Pareene: You Are Jonathan Chait's Enemy: Chait is complaining
"about the 'dangerous consequences' of the left's use of the label 'white
supremacist' to describe Donald Trump, the alt-right, and American
conservatism in general," in what Pareene describes as "just another
paint-by-numbers 'the greatest threat to free speech in the nation
today is college students heckling an asshole' column."
Chait is policing the way the left does politics because he does not
want the left-wing style of doing politics to gain prominence.
Something that is well-known to people who've read Chait for years,
but may not be apparent to those who just think of him as a standard-issue
center-left pundit who is sort of clueless about race, is that he is
engaged in a pretty specific political project: Ensuring that you and
people like you don't gain control of his party.
Pareene's getting a bit touchy here, but he's not the only one
suspicious that so-called centrists relish attacking the left while
offering the right undeserved respect and legitimacy -- which in the
long run works in their favor. The problem with centrism is that the
track record doesn't show that taking such a conciliatory stance
delivers much in the way of tangible benefits -- indeed, if anything
it shows retreats while the right grows stronger and more aggressive.
It seems time to ask whether stronger leftist critiques might turn
out to be more effective, especially with people who don't start out
with a strong political stance. For instance, why not refer to people
as white supremacists who may merely be garden variety racists? --
especially people like Trump who seem so comfortable aligned with
undoubted white supremacists like the KKK?
David Rothkopf: The NSC is 70 this week -- and the first thing it ever did
was meddle in a foreign election: In 1947, created by the National
Security Act, its first paper ("NSC 1") approved by Truman to covertly
meddle in elections in Italy, "trying to counter the effects of the
Soviets to support the rise of the Italian Communist Party," no mention
of the popularity the PCI gained by resisting Mussolini and the German
occupation. Of course, the CIA went on to do much more than merely game
foreign elections; e.g.:
Vincent Bevins: In Indonesia, the 'fake news' that fueled a Cold War
massacre is still potent five decades later:
Gen. Suharto, then the head of the army's strategic reserve command
and relying on support from the CIA, accused the powerful Communist
Party of orchestrating a coup attempt and took over as the military's
de facto leader. Over the next few months, his forces oversaw the
systematic execution of at least 500,000 Indonesians, and historians
say they may have killed up to 1 million. The massacre decimated the
world's third-largest Communist Party (behind those of the Soviet
Union and China), and untold numbers were tortured and killed simply
for allegedly associating with communists.
The military dictatorship that formed afterward, led by Suharto,
made wildly inaccurate anti-communist propaganda a cornerstone of
its legitimacy and ruled Indonesia with U.S. support until 1998.
Alex Thompson/Ryan Grim: Kansas Won't Expand Medicaid, Denying a Lifeline
to Rural Hospitals and Patients: Well, some, like the one in Independence,
are already dead. Gov. Brownback, who vetoed the bill to expand Medicaid,
has been nominated to a State Department post to hector the world on God,
but Lt. Gov. Colyer promises to veto future bills as well, so no relief
Zeynep Tufekci: Zuckerberg's Preposterous Defense of Facebook:
It's become clear that Russia created hundreds of clandestine Facebook
accounts and used them and Facebook's advertising system to spread
misinformation about the 2016 election. People are upset about that
because they don't like the idea of a foreign power attempting to
tilt an American election, possibly as a general principle but often
just because it's Russia attempting to undermine Hillary Clinton
and/or to elect Trump. Still, doesn't the US do the same thing to
other countries? And don't both parties and their donors do the
same thing to each other? I have no doubt that Facebook makes the
general problem much worse, mostly because it allows unprecedentely
precise, even intimate, targeting by whoever's willing to put the
money into it. Advertisers have been trying to refine targeting for
decades, but they've mostly been concerned with efficiency -- getting
the most cost-effective set of buyers to consider a standard product
pitch. Political advertising is different because votes are different
from purchases, and, given limited choices, negative advertising is
often more effective. Until recently, we could limit this damage by
requiring disclosure of whoever is buying the advertising. Facebook
undermines this paradigm in several ways: it helps advertisers hide
their identity, and thereby avoid responsibility for any damages; it
allows messages to be very narrowly tailored; its effect is amplified
by viral "sharing"; it precludes any systematic effort to recall or
correct misinformation. Americans have long been lulled into the lure
of advertising, which offers to pay for entertainment and news while
only demanding a small (and initially distinct) slice of your time.
And we've basically gone along with this scheme because we haven't
noticed what it's doing to us -- much like a lobster doesn't notice
heating water until it's much too late. It's going to be difficult
to unravel all these levels of duplicity and to restore any measure
of integrity to the democratic process. But two things should be
clear by now: the fact that someone like Donald Trump got elected
president shows that our system for informing ourselves about the
world is badly broken; and that as long as powerful forces -- I'd
start with virtually all corporations, most Republicans, and many
Democrats, and throw in a few more special interest groups (not
least the CIA and the post-KGB -- believe that they benefit from
this system there will be much resistance to changing it. Indeed,
it probably has to be defeated before it can be changed.
By the way, Matt Taibbi has a relevant piece:
Latest Fake News Panic Appears to Be Fake News, wherein he
The irony here is that the solution to so much of this fake news panic
is so simple. If we just spent more time outside, or read more books,
or talked in person to real human beings more often, we'd be less
susceptible to this sort of thing. But that would take effort, and
who has time for that?
Matthew Yglesias: 4 stories that really mattered this week:
i.e., more than Trump's spat with the NFL: Obamacare repeal died
again; Puerto Rico is in crisis; Republicans rolled
out a tax cut plan; Roy Moore won the GOP nomination in
Alabama. Other recent Yglesias posts:
Trump is proposing big tax hikes on vulnerable House Republicans'
constituents (ending deductability of state and local taxes [SALT],
a big deal in upscale suburban districts);
A House Republican explains why deficits don't matter anymore:
Mark Walker says "It's a great talking point when you have an
administration that's Democrat-led" -- this just confirms what we've
already observed, as when Nixon declared "we're all Keynesians now"
when he wanted more deficit spending to prop up his re-election
economy, or Cheney declared "deficits don't matter," yet Clinton
and Obama were constantly pounded over deficit spending;
Trump keeps saying Graham-Cassidy failed because a senator's in the
Nobody wants Donald Trump's corporate tax cut plan: "Americans
overwhelmingly want large businesses to pay more taxes rather than
The Jones Act, the obscure 1920 shipping regulation strangling Puerto Rico,
Trump's plan to sell tax cuts for the rich is to pretend they're not
Democrats ought to invest in Doug Jones's campaign against Roy Moore;
Angela Merkel won in a landslide -- now comes the hard part;
Donald Trump versus the NFL, explained.
Saturday, September 30. 2017
No free disk space on my server, so it's impossible to update the
website. Hence: no "faux blog" post, no new images (several late-breaking
A- records, plus notice that I'm currently reading the Jonathan Allen/Amie
Parnes horror story, Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton's Doomed
The Serendipity blog appears to still be working,
so I should be able to post my text there. I'm tempted to cross-post
elsewhere, but don't have any good ideas at the minute.
After procrastinating some, I finally started to work on moving
the website last night. My first idea was to install a Serendipity
blog locally -- I vaguely recalled that it has some import tools,
so hoped I might be able to import directly from the old blog, but
after I got it working the import tools doesn't seem likely to work.
(One big problem with my ISP is that I haven't been able to do a
full database dump for several years now, and not having any disk
space means I wouldn't have any place to temporarily hold the dump.)
My second idea was to use HTTrack to clone the blog-portion of the
website, but simple operation would pick up too many redundant pages.
I suspect there are options to limit this -- there seem to be about a
hundred option switches -- so it can probably be done, but thus far I
haven't figured out how. Still, I made a little progress last night:
I wrote a shell script to collect all 171 pages of entries (2558 total)
in the blog roll and save them in a directory. Today I realized this
doesn't include the "further reading" parts of long blog posts, so I
will have to identify them and go back a second time. Indeed, it might
be best to use the pages I extracted to get the individual page URLs
and grab them all again, so they'd wind up in separate files. In any
case, it will take another program to extract usable data from the
captured HTML files. The easiest thing then would be to convert it
into my "faux blog" format, although it might be more useful to hack
it into something I can stuff into a database (e.g., another blog,
not necessarily Serendipity).
Good news, I suppose, is that when I get what I want from the site,
I can end my dependency on the ISP (ADDR.COM -- highly unrecommended)
and install at least my static files on a new server. No idea when
that will be possible -- probably a week or two, although I could get
snagged up in something or other.
Normally I'd try to write some notes out on the music below, but
given the circumstances, I'll let it speak for itself. A review of
last month's Music Week posts might help.
Most of these are short notes/reviews based on streaming records
from Napster (formerly Rhapsody; other sources are noted in brackets).
They are snap judgments, usually based on one or two plays, accumulated
since my last post along these lines, back on August 30. Past reviews
and more information are available
here (10173 records).
Gabriel Alegria Afro-Peruvian Sextet: Diablo en Brooklyn
(2017, Saponegro): Trumpet player from Peru, sextet includes Laura
Andrea Leguia (tenor/soprano sax), Yuri Juarez (guitar), Freddy
Lobatón (cajon), Hugo Alcazar (drums), and normally a bassist (John
Benitez or Mario Cuba, but I don't see either in the credits, just
a couple guest spots for keyboardist Russell Ferrante and one for
guitarist Jocho Velásquez). Comes out hard on the beat, then sashays
through several parts of "The Brooklyn Suite," with various interludes
including a marvelous snatch of "Summertime."
Alfjors: Demons 1 (2015 , Shhpuma, EP):
Portuguese avant-rock trio -- Mestre André (tenor sax, electronics,
percussion, mbira, voice), Bernardo Alvares (bass, voice), Raphael
Soares (drums) -- claim influences from African forests and Mongolian
steppes, from Can and Lemmy and Hawkwind and "Saint John Coltrane,"
pounded into dense, ecstatic rhythms. Two fairly long cuts plus an
interlude, 3 tracks, 28:39.
Chino Amobi: Paradiso (2017, Non): Born in Alabama,
based in Richmond, VA. Discogs lists style as "Experimental, Bas
Music, Grime, Industrial" -- I've seen this described as a "dystopian
soundtrack." It's certainly harrowing enough, but it's not as if
we're not living through dystopia enough in the real world.
Atomic: Six Easy Pieces (2016 , Odin):
Swedish/Norwegian supergroup, fourteenth album since 2001, the six
pieces split between Fredrik Ljungkvist (sax/clarinet) and Håvard
Wiik (piano), the others: Magnus Broo (trumpet), Ingebrigt Håker
Flaten (bass), and Hans Hulbaekmo (drums; until recently the
drummer was Paal Nilssen-Love). The pianist often takes charge
here, the horns rarely breaking as free as you'd expect. Title
also seems to be available in an expanded 3-CD package, adding
a couple live sets.
Michaël Attias Quartet: Nerve Dance (2016 ,
Clean Feed): Alto saxophonist, born in Israel, grew up in Paris and
Minneapolis, based in New York since 1994. Quartet with a fine rhythm
section, most notably pianist Aruán Ortiz but also John Hébert (bass)
and Nasheet Waits (drums).
João Barradas: Directions (2017, Inner Circle Music):
Accordion player, from Portugal, young, appears to be his first album.
Guest spots for Greg Osby (alto sax), Gil Goldstein (accordion), and
Sara Serpa (voice). Backed with guitar, piano, bass, drums. Shows some
range, lots of energy.
Django Bates: Saluting Sgt. Pepper (2016 ,
Edition): British jazz pianist, mixed a Jimi Hendrix tribute in
with more avant experiments back in the 1990s but hasn't recorded
much since 2009. Goes for a straight 50th anniversary remake of
the Beatles classic here, backed by Frankfurt Radio Big Band, with
a Danish trio called Eggs Laid by Tigers handling the vocals, bass,
and drums. Still a great record, but an unnecessary version.
Richard X Bennett: Experiments With Truth (2017,
Ropeadope): Pianist, based in New York, has two new records out,
old ones back to 2010. This is a fusion-groove set with two
saxophonists -- Matt Parker (mostly tenor) and Lisa Parrott (mostly
Richard X Bennett: What Is Now (2017, Ropeadope):
Piano trio, with Adam Armstrong (bass) and Alex Wyatt (drums). All
originals except for "Over the Rainbow." Stress again on rhythm,
but nothing hinting of fusion.
Black Lips: Satan's Graffiti or God's Art? (2017, Vice):
Garage rock band, formed in Dunwoody, Georgia, based in Atlanta, eighth
studio album since 2003.
Lena Bloch & Feathery: Heart Knows (2017, Fresh
Sound New Talent): Tenor saxophonist, born in Moscow, emigrated to
Israel in 1990, studied in Germany, currently teaches in Brooklyn.
She released Feathery in 2014, and has kept the name for her
quartet: Russ Lossing (piano), Cameron Brown (bass), and Billy Mintz
(drums). Bloch and Lossing wrote four cuts each. They flow easily,
nothing really standing out.
Bomba Estéreo: Ayo (2017, Sony Music Latin): Colombian
group, cumbia with electro glitz, the beat hard, the vocals a bit in
Jean-François Bonnel and His Swinging Jazz Cats: With Thanks
to Benny Carter (2017, Arbors): French alto saxophonist, plays
clarinet on two cuts here; seems to have had several albums, although
a list isn't easy to come by. At any rate, mostly plays with trad jazz
musicians like Ken Colyer and Keith Nichols. Carter tunes and other
standards, with Chris Dawson (piano), François Laudet (drums), and
singer Charmin Michelle (6/9 cuts).
Action Bronson: Blue Chips 7000 (2017, Vice/Atlantic):
Rapper Arian Asllani, from Flushing, father Albanian Muslim, mother
American Jewish, worked under various names before settling on this
one -- most notably, Mr. Baklava. Fourth studio album (not counting
four mixtapes), second on a major label. Underground beats, stoned
sneer, lots of chopped salad.
Don Bryant: Don't Give Up on Love (2017, Fat Possum):
Memphis soul singer-songwriter, b. 1942, cut an album for Hi in 1969,
wrote several famous song with/for wife Ann Peebles, tried his hand
at gospel in the late 1980s and 2000, recycled some old songs and a
few new ones here.
Chamber 4: City of Light (2016 , Clean Feed):
Franco-Portuguese group: Luis Vicente (trumpet), Théo Ceccaldi
(violin), Valentin Ceccaldi (cello), Marcelo dos Reis (acoustic
and prepared guitar), the latter three also credited with voice.
All improv, notes say they never even discussed what they might
do. Ambles some, but guitar can surprise you.
Brian Charette Circuit Bent Organ Trio: Kürrent (2017,
Dim Mak): Organ player, with Ben Monder (guitar) and Jordan Young (drums).
"Circuit Bending is a technique where electronic instruments are manipulated
so that they misfire (!!!) creating far out sonic landscapes." Charette
does a good job of steering clear of the genre's clichés, but this isn't
bent enough to be especially interesting.
Zack Clarke: Random Acts of Order (2017, Clean Feed):
Pianist, based in New York, first album, a trio with Henry Fraser on
bass and Dre Hocevar on percussion.
Collective Order: Vol. 2 (2017, self-released): Toronto
collective, not really a group album, more like "various artists" -- a
dozen or so leader/composers, sharing a pool of 19 musicians (3 vocalists).
Some pieces catch my ear, like Connor Newton's Latin-flavored "Mahsong";
most kind of elide together.
Stanley Cowell: No Illusions (2015 , SteepleChase):
Pianist, first impressed me with his 1969 Blues for the Viet Cong,
now 75 with a large discography -- mostly trios, but this one brightens
up with Bruce Williams' alto sax and flute. Also with Jay Anderson (bass)
and Billy Drummond (drums).
Damaged Bug: Bunker Funk (2017, Castle Face): Electronica
side project by John Dwyer, best known (though not very well by me) for
Thee Oh Sees.
DEK Trio: Construct 1: Stone (2016 , Audiographic):
Group named for first initials: Didi Kern (drums), Elisabeth Harnik
(piano), Ken Vandermark (reeds). Two cuts, 43:48, recorded live at
the Stone in NYC. Vandermark works his way through his instrument
rack, especially masterful on tenor and baritone, and piercing on
what I assume to be his clarinet. The Austrians support him with a
range of overlapping and suitably discordant rhythms.
DEK Trio: Construct 2: Artfacts (2017, Audiographic):
Third album, back in Austria, with pianist Harnik coming out more
while Vandermark screeches on clarinet. Best stretch comes in "Paper
Tongue": a strong platform rhythm under some of Vandermark's finest
tenor sax honk.
DEK Trio: Construct 3: Ovadlo 29 (2017, Audiographic):
Moving on, nine days later in the Czech Republic. Three more pieces,
two 21-minute bashes and a 4:10 variation. Best clarinet bit yet, a
very strong tenor sax stretch.
Dave Douglas With the Westerlies and Anwar Marshall: Little
Giant Still Life (2016 , Greenleaf Music): The Westerlies,
who have a previous album with Wayne Horvitz, add two trumpets and two
trombones to the leader's trumpet, with Marshall on drums. Similar to
Douglas' other brass band experiments, but less bottom, more postbop.
Mike Downes: Root Structure (2016 , Addo):
Bassist, from Canada, sixth album since 1997, won a Juno Award
for Ripple Effect in 2014. Quartet with guitar (Ted Quinlan),
piano/keys (Robi Botos), and drums. Original material (aside from
odd bits by Botos and Chopin). Pleasantly engaging.
Chet Doxas: Rich in Symbols (2017, Ropeadope):
Artist's name, credited with "woodwinds and synths," not on cover or
spine -- in fact, nothing on cover. Quartet with guitar (Matthew
Stevens), bass and drums, loosely fits as fusion elaborating riffs
into grooves. Guests Dave Douglas and John Escreet appear on one
track each, Dave Nugent on three, producer Liam O'Neil all over
Kaja Draksler Octet: Gledalec (2016 , Clean
Feed, 2CD): Pianist from Slovenia, also in European Movement Jazz
Orchestra, fourth and most ambitious album, although note that two
singers occupy slots in the Octet, leaving six instrumentalists:
two saxophonists (Ada Rave and Ab Baars), violin (George Dumitriu),
bass, and drums. The vocals are arch and/or arty, the sax much
preferred, although both struggle on the rough footing.
Bob Dylan: Fallen Angels (2016, Columbia): Spacing
for Dylan albums since 1993's World Gone Wrong: 4 years, 4,
5, 3, 3 (Tempest, in 2012, the most forgettable of the run).
So, you might expect a new one around 2015, but the muse evidently
failing him, Dylan decided to cover Ye Great American Songbook for
his godawful Shadows in the Night. That proved easy enough
he's come up with this sequel just one year later (and even more
in 2017). But where the previous album's renditions were grating,
he's softened these up to the point of insignificance.
Bob Dylan: Triplicate (2017, Columbia, 3CD): More
songbook, spread out over three discs but they're short ones: 31:48,
32:07, 31:47, 10 songs each. Notes: Jimmy Van Heusen seems to be
Dylan's favorite songwriter (7 songs, 4 with Johnny Burke, 2 with
Sammy Cahn); only one Irving Berlin (one each Arlen, Rodgers, Kern,
Carmichael), nothing by Cole Porter or the Gershwins; horns on the
opener, but strings are more prevalent later. I probably hear more
than fifty vocal standards records each year, and I can't think of
any aspect Dylan isn't below average in. Not his worst -- the horns
do perk things up -- but still.
Harris Eisenstadt Canada Day Quartet: On Parade in Parede
(2016 , Clean Feed): Drummer, group dates back to 2009 Canada
Day album, with Nate Wooley (trumpet), Matt Bauder (tenor sax), and
Pascal Niggenkemper (bass). Strongest when the two horns spin free.
John Escreet: The Unknown: Live in Concert (2016,
Sunnyside): Pianist, seventh album since 2008, started on mainstream
labels but this quartet represents an avant move: John Hébert (bass),
Tyshawn Sorey (drums, vibes), and most importantly (and unmistakably)
Evan Parker (tenor sax), with the pianist distinguishing himself with
his oblique cross rhythms. Two parts, from two consecutive days in
the Netherlands, totalling 74:47.
Adam Fairhall: Friendly Ghosts (2017, Efpi):
British pianist, has a couple previous album and sidework with Nat
Birchall. Takes this one solo. I'm not seeing a credits list, but
several songs have words like "rag," "stomp," and "boogie" in the
title, and the music reminds me of Dave Burrell's more antique
Erica Falls: Home Grown (2017, self-released):
Soul singer from New Orleans, second album, can't find much bio
and was thrown by description of "her sophomore project titled
Vintage Soul" -- must be this one. Doesn't strike me as
vintage but if she wants to claim Irma Thomas -- not actually
on her list of claimed influences, but the best model I can come
up with -- she has a strong start.
Fat Tony: MacGregor Park (2017, First One Up, EP):
Houston rapper, born in Nigeria as Anthony Lawson Jude Ifeanyichukwu
Obiawunaotu, shortened to Anthony Jude Obi. Fourth studio album, a
bit short at eight cuts, 28:35, but with an infectiously easy flow,
not that life comes so easy.
George Freeman: 90 Going on Amazing (2005 ,
Blujazz): Guitarist from Chicago, brother of saxophonist Von Freeman,
cut his first record in 1969, side credits go back to a 1961 record
with Richard "Groove" Holmes and Ben Webster, 90 and still performing
now but a mere 78 when this was recorded. Mostly easy-going funk, a
quartet with Vince Willis prominent on piano.
Tomas Fujiwara: Triple Double (2017, Firehouse 12):
Looks more like a double trio, with Ralph Alessi and Tyler Ho Bynum
on trumpet/cornet, Mary Halvorson and Brandon Seabrook on guitar,
Gerald Cleaver and Fujiwara on drums. I haven't quite figured out
the parts where the leader talks about music direction, but I'm
quite taken by how they all bounce off one another.
Gato Preto: Tempo (2017, Unique): Dance groove duo,
producer Lee Bass (from Ghana) and singer-rapper Gata Misteriosa
(from Mozambique) -- based somewhere in Europe, but that's about
all I've been able to find, although I count 25 releases (including
EPs and Remixes) on their Bandcamp page. Which makes them a subject
for further research, although for now I'd rather not muddy up the
clear uniqueness of their electro rush.
Philipp Gerschlauer/David Fiuczynski: Mikrojazz: Neue
Expressionistische Musik (2016 , Rare Noise): German
alto saxophonist, American guitarist, the latter 22 years older,
basically a fusion player (early album title: Jazz Punk).
Gerschlauer, best known for his group Besaxung, developed a
microtonal technique that splits an octave into 128 pitch steps.
Band includes Jack De Johnette (drums), Matt Garrison (bass),
and Giorgi Mikadze (microtonal keyboards). Doesn't sound all
that exotic, but flows nicely.
Mats Gustafsson & Craig Taborn: Ljubljana (2015
, Clean Feed): Duo, slide and baritone saxes vs. piano, two
improv pieces totalling 38:04 so they decided to release it on vinyl.
The saxophonist backs off his usual squall, deferring to the pianist,
who provides most of the interest.
João Hasselberg & Pedro Branco: From Order to Chaos
(2017, Clean Feed): Portuguese bass and guitar duo, based in Copenhagen,
backed discreetly by drummer João Lencastre, with an occasional guest
or two on half the tracks -- saxophonist Albert Cirera changes the
chemistry to something much more combustible.
Florian Hoefner: Coldwater Stories (2016 ,
Origin): German pianist, based in Canada (off the beaten path in
St. John's, Newfoundland), half-dozen records, this one solo,
improvising against the steady roll of his rhythmic figures.
Eric Hofbauer: Ghost Frets (2016 , Creative
Nation Music): Guitarist, Discogs only lists four albums since 1998
but I've heard many more than that, most quite interesting. This
one is solo, deftly picked: four originals, two from kindred spirit,
the late Garrison Fewell, five more from the tradition (Oliver, Monk,
Dolphy) and beyond.
Eric Hofbauer: Prehistoric Jazz Volume 4: Reminiscing in
Tempo (2017, Creative Nation Music): Previous volumes have
picked on modern classical music (Stravinsky, Messiaen, Ives), so
why not Edward Kennedy "Duke" Ellington, widely cited as the great
composer of "America's classical music"? Quintet: guitar, trumpet,
clarinet, cello, drums. Ellington's piece, a tribute to his mother
from 1935, was originally spread out over four 10-inch sides, but
still only came to 12 minutes. Hofbauer picks it apart, extending
his deconstruction to 24:50, but the theme comes through as elegant
Honest John: International Breakthrough (2015-16
, Clean Feed): Norwegian-Swedish quintet, musician order
seems significant here: Ole-Henrik Moe (violin), Kim Johannesen
(guitar/banjo), Ola Høyer (double bass), Erik Nylander (drums/drum
machine), Klaus Ellerhusen Holm (alto sax/clarinet). Actually, Holm
becomes more prominent toward the end, but the early string focus
is most distinctive.
Humcrush: Enter Humcrush (2014-15 , Shhpuma):
Norwegian jazztronica duo, Ståle Storløkken (keyboards) and Thomas
Strønen (drums), fifth album together, mostly a rush complex enough
to keep it interesting, but tails off a bit.
Garland Jeffreys: 14 Steps to Harlem (2017, Luna Park):
Singer-songwriter, has played off his biracial roots for most of his
career, a status he indulges when he can't shake it, which is most of
the time. Biggest surprise: a pair of covers, songs by Lou Reed and
Lennon-McCartney, the latter with Reed in the band.
Kesha: Rainbow (2017, Kemosabe/RCA): Kesha Sebert,
returns with her third album five years after number two, starting
with a timely song that goes "don't let the bastards get you down,"
and bending several genres around her pop pinky.
Lauren Kinhan: A Sleepin' Bee (2017, Dotted i):
Singer, best known as a member of New York Voices since 1992,
fourth solo project since 1999, "the inspiration of this project
sprung from nancy wilson's iconic collaboration with cannonball
adderley." Still, she took to Wilson more than to Cannonball,
not bothering to hire a saxophonist (although Ingrid Jensen
makes a fair sub for Nat).
Kirk Knuffke: Cherryco (2016 , SteepleChase):
Cornet player, from Colorado, Discogs credits him with 19 albums since
2009. This is a trio with Jay Anderson (bass) and Adam Nussbaum (drums)
playing songs by Ornette Coleman and Don Cherry -- the focus is on the
latter, both because he played various trumpets and because he was an
essential part of Coleman's pathbreaking quartet, so in a sense what
we're hearing here is Coleman without the saxophone.
Kokotob: Flying Heart (2016 , Clean Feed):
Trio, with Taiko Saito (marimba/vibraphone), Niko Meinhold (piano),
and Tobias Schirmer (clarinets) -- name assembled from first name
fragments (hint: Saito and Meinhold had a 2006 duo album named
Koko). None of the trio have extensive discographies, but
I should note that Discogs lists two different Schirmers -- the
other a drummer. An attractive beatwise, if not very jazzy, piece
of chamber music.
LCD Soundsystem: American Dream (2017, DFA/Columbia):
Fourth album, moving ever closer to what we used to call new wave, at
one point reminding me of Talking Heads, but less interesting, of course.
David Lopato: Gendhing for a Spirit Rising (2017,
Global Coolant, 2CD): Pianist, from Brooklyn, fifth album since
1981, also plays some other instruments here including "Embertone
Friedlander virtual violin" and percussion (mostly with mallets).
He also makes occasional use of reeds (Marty Ehrlich, Lucas Pino),
strings (Erik Friedlander, Mark Feldman), vibes (Bill Ware), drums
(Tom Rainey, Michael Sarin), and more exotic instruments. Sometimes
seems closer to baroque than jazz, but not always.
Luis Lopes: Love Song (2015 , Shhpuma):
Portuguese guitarist, I've found him to be especially impressive
in his Lisbon Berlin Trio and Humanization 4Tet. This is solo,
electric but so muted it hardly matters.
L'Orange & Jeremiah Jae: The Night Took Us in Like
Family (2015, Mello Music Group): Don't know anything about
L'Orange, but he seems to be the beat guy, with Jae rapping
(also guest spots for Gift of Gab and Homeboy Sandman). Skits
can break the groove, which is pretty compelling.
L'Orange & Kool Keith: Time? Astonishing! (2015,
Mello Music Group): Beats still interesting -- in fact, starts with
an instrumental and could build on that. The once-and-future Dr.
Octagon goes spacey here, probably for the best.
L'Orange & Mr. Lif: The Life & Death of Scenery
(2016, Mello Music Group): Conceived as an Orwellian dystopia, where
art and music are banned and people are herded into worshipping the sun,
the moon, and, of course, their fearless leader. Released about a month
before we entered our own brave new world, where art and music survive
because the new leaders are too clueless to suspect they're subversive.
That may be why I found this much funnier than was no doubt intended,
but that's how we deal with dystopia these days.
Tony Malaby/Mat Maneri/Daniel Levin: New Artifacts
(2015 , Clean Feed): An avant variation on sax-with-strings,
with the viola and cello alternately seeking to harmonize the sax
and pull it in unexpected directions. An improvised live set, the
lack of drums placing it uneasily in the realm of chamber jazz.
Luís José Martins: Tentos -- Invenções E Encantamentos
(2017, Shhpuma): Portuguese guitarist, in a band called Powertrio,
credited with classical and prepared guitars here, also electronics
and percussion, the former setting the sound. All originals, even
with his "remote evocation of that rudimentary and warm Iberian
musical form of the 17th century."
Ernest McCarty Jr. & Jimmie Smith: A Reunion Tribute
to Erroll Garner (2017, Blujazz): Bassist and drummer in
pianist Garner's 1970-77 quartet -- the fourth player was congalero
José Mangual, replaced here by Noel Quintana. The songbook includes
Garner's "Misty" and "Gemini" but mostly features standards, opening
with "Caravan." The record is pure delight, but you have to dig deep
into the book to discover the all-important pianist: Geri Allen. Her
recent death makes this even more poignant.
Meridian Trio: Triangulum (2016 , Clean Feed):
Alto sax trio based in Chicago: Nick Mazzarella, Matt Ulery, and
Jeremy Cunningham. Avant or postbop, shades of both, part of their
triangulation. Runs long, could benefit from what we call editing.
Emi Meyer: Monochrome (2009-16 , Origin):
Singer, wrote five (of nine) songs here, born in Japan but grew
up in Seattle, studied in Los Angeles, splits her time between
Seattle and Tokyo bases. Plays piano, but mostly defers here to
Dawn Clement. Nice closer: "What a Wonderful World."
Mind Games [Angelika Niescier/Denman Maroney/James Ilgenfritz/Andrew
Drury]: Ephemera Obscura (2013 , Clean Feed): Alto
sax, piano, bass, percussion -- Maroney's machine doesn't sound all
that "hyper" this time out. Nice sax tone, nimble, moves all around.
MIR 8: Perihelion (2017, Shhpuma): Quartet: Andrea
Belfi (drums), Werner Dafeldecker (function generators, bass), Hilary
Jeffery (trombone), Tim Wright (computer/electronics). Website dubs
these "four cinematic tracks . . . through panoramic landscapes . . .
with multi-layered hybrid structures" and that's about right, as far
as one cares. Vinyl length: 32:22.
Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark: The Punishment of Luxury
(2017, White Noise): English electropop duo, a pioneer if not inventor
of wry, danceable pop as far back as 1980. Half the songs sparkle much
like their prime period, especially the first two, not that they don't
stall out here and there.
Chris Parker: Moving Forward Now (2017, self-released):
Drummer, also plays tenor sax, "debut" album (evidently not the drummer
who played with the Brecker Bros., nor the pianist who's recorded on
OA2), tries to do a little bit of everything on his first album, with
thirteen other musicians listed on the cover. Starts off with "Battle
Hymn of the Republic," segues into Rachmaninoff. None of it is especially
notable, least of all Rachel Caswell's vocal turn on "Don't Think Twice
It's Alright." It isn't.
Jonah Parzen-Johnson: I Try to Remember Where I Come From
(2017, Clean Feed): Baritone saxophonist, grew up in Chicago, based in
New York. This is solo, "recorded live to two track without loops or
overdubs," yet Parzen-Johnson also manages to play analog synthesizer
almost continuously, adding rhythm and harmony to the horn's fluttering
Mario Pavone: Vertical (2016 , Clean Feed):
Bassist, an important composer with a substantial discography since
1979, working with a sextet here: Dave Ballou (trumpet), Tony Malaby
(tenor/soprano sax), Oscar Noriega (clarinet/bass clarinet), Peter
McEachern (trombone), Mike Sarin (drums). Noriega is especially
striking here -- a favored voice the others revolve around.
Debbie Poryes Trio: Loving Hank (2017, OA2):
Pianist, third album since 2007, a trio plus Erik Jakobson's
flugelhorn on one cut. Half originals, the first dedicated to
Hank Jones sets the tone.
Franciszek Pospieszalski Sextet: 1st Level (2016
, ForTune): Polish bassist, probably his first album (Discogs
lists two others he has played on). Group includes tenor sax, alto
sax, piano, two drummers (one also credited with electronics and
vibraphone), plus a guest trumpet on one cut -- only two names I've
run across before, neither I particularly remembered. Sound has a
bit of circus air, slinking by through sleight-of-hand.
Public Enemy: Nothing Is Quick in the Desert (2017,
Enemy): Old school, dense with a lot of guitar as well as ever-so-hard
beats. Could be that more plays would put this over -- can't say as I
picked up on any lyrics, but they certainly have points to make. Was
available for free download for a few days up to July 4, but I missed
Dave Rempis: Lattice (2017, Aerophonic): Saxophonist
from Chicago tries a solo album, playing alto, tenor, and baritone.
Cherry-picked together from four spots, with two covers among the six
cuts (Billy Strayhorn, Eric Dolphy), keeps it tight and thoughtful,
minimizing the usual solo sax pitfalls.
The Rempis Percussion Quartet: Cochonnerie (2015
, Aerophonic): So-named for two drummers, Tim Daisy and Frank
Rosaly, joined by Ingebrigt Håker Flaten on bass and leader Dave
Rempis on alto/tenor/baritone sax, who started stealing scenes in
the Vandermark 5. Sixth group album, all impressive, this one all
the more together.
Rolling Blackouts C.F.: Talk Tight (2015 ,
Sub Pop, EP): Australian group, first of two EPs -- this one
7 songs, 28:59, released in Australia in 2015 with "C.F." spelled
out as Coastal Fever. Picked up along with the follow-up by an
American alt-indie label. They sustain their 4-minute average with
ringing altish guitars, then for a change of pace do a nifty
Rolling Blackouts C.F.: The French Press (2017,
Sub Pop, EP): Cover abbreviates last half of group name, although
I've seen this credited both ways. A bit shorter at 6 cuts, 25:09.
Maintains their trademark guitar sound, but not sure what else.
ROVA Saxophone Quartet/Kyle Bruckmann/Henry Kaiser: Steve
Lacy's Saxophone Special Revisited (2015 , Clean Feed):
Lacy's 1975 album is much more obscure than Ascension, John
Coltrane's original sax orgy, which ROVA has twice re-recorded --
I've never heard it, although it was noted in my database -- but it
is an immediate forebear of the saxophone quartet (WSQ and ROVA
first recorded in 1977). Lacy's album also featured four saxophonists
(Lacy on soprano, Steve Potts and Trevor Watts on alto, Evan Parker
on tenor), guitar (Derek Bailey), and synthesizer (Michel Waisvisz),
so this offers essentially the same lineup (occasionally switching
to baritone and/or sopranino). In some ways quite remarkable, but
too harsh for me to enjoy.
Vitor Rua and the Metaphysical Angels: Do Androids Dream
of Electrid Guitars? (2017, Clean Feed, 2CD): Portuguese
guitarist, discography back to 1990, first disc is solo, second
with his group (bass, drums, piano, trumpet, clarinets). The solo
relies heavily on synth effects for its distinctness. The group
develops slowly, before turning into more of the same.
Rune Your Day: Rune Your Day (2016 , Clean
Feed): Scandinavian avant-jazz group (recorded in Oslo, anyway):
Jørgen Mathisen (tenor/soprano sax, clarinet), André Roligheten
(tenor/baritone sax), Rune Nergaard (bass), Axel Skalstad (drums).
Plods along, heavy and awkward, but there's something to be said
for brute power.
Saint Etienne: Home Counties (2017, Heavenly):
British pop group featuring singer Sarah Cracknell, first album in
1991. I've never gotten into their pleasant melodiousness, but this
is as pleasing, beguiling even, as anything I've heard from them.
San Francisco String Trio: May I Introduce to You
(2016 , Ridgeway): Fairly well-known musicians: Mads Tolling
(violin), Mimi Fox (guitars), Jeff Denson (bass and vocals on three
tracks). Conceived as a 50th anniversary salute to Sgt. Pepper's
Lonely Hearts Club Band, the arrangements often sly, the vocals
unnecessary (although I found "A Day in the Life" rather charming).
The Angelica Sanchez Trio: Float the Edge (2016
, Clean Feed): Pianist, born in Phoenix, half-dozen albums as
leader since 2003, this a trio with Michael Formanek (bass) and
Tyshawn Sorey (drums) underpinning the rhythmic abstractions.
The Selva: The Selva (2016 , Clean Feed):
Portuguese trio: Ricardo Jacinto (cello), Gonçalo Almeida (bass),
Nuno Morão (drums). First album, all improv, the bass resonates
Shabazz Palaces: Quazarz: Born on a Gangster Star
(2017, Sub Pop): Experimental hip-hop duo from Seattle, with Ishmael
Butler (aka Palaceer Lazaro, formerly Butterfly of Digable Planets)
and Tendai "Baba" Maraire ("son of mbira master Dumisani Maraire").
Two previous albums, plus some EPs, plus another album released the
same day as this one, the common concept Quazarz, whatever that may
mean. I've always found them to be inscrutable and indecipherable,
but I hear they get better if you play them loud and/or dig in for
the long haul. Fair chance that's true here as well.
Shabazz Palaces: Quazarz vs the Jealous Machines
(2017, Sub Pop): "Quazarz came to the Earth from somewhere else, a
musical ambassador from his place to ours." If that sounds a little
vague, try figuring out the album. "Coming from a simpler, more
essential, innocent place, the hero could not make heads nor tails
of most advancements."
Matthew Shipp Quartet: Not Bound (2016 ,
ForTune): Avant pianist, third album this year, making it hard
to take seriously his periodic retirements. Quartet adds Daniel
Carter (flute, trumpet, tenor/soprano sax) to his usual Trio
with Michael Bisio and Whit Dickey. Reminds me how effective
Shipp can be working behind and around a saxophonist -- e.g.,
his decade-plus with David S. Ware -- but also a good outing
Tommy Smith: Embodying the Light: A Dedication to John
Coltrane (2017, Spartacus): Scots tenor saxophonist, born
on the same day Coltrane died -- which might explain some things
if you believe in reincarnation like the Dalai Lama -- assembled
a batch of Coltrane songs for their 50th. Done in classic Quartet
style with Peter Johnstone (piano), Calum Gourlary (bass), and
Sebastian de Krom (drums) holding their own. Still, it's the
saxophonist's extraordinary chops that make the album undeniable.
Wadada Leo Smith/Natsuki Tamura/Satoko Fujii/Ikue Mori:
Aspiration (2016 , Libra): Two trumpet players,
piano, and electronics, with Fujii writing four (of six) pieces,
one each for the trumpet players. Surprisingly sedate given the
company, the trumpets often retiring, the electronics hard to
locate, but the piano offering a thoughtful framework.
David Stackenäs: Bricks (2013 , Clean Feed):
Swedish guitarist, Discogs lists a dozen albums since 2000, but
most (including the two I've heard) would be filed under other
names. This is solo acoustic, somewhat given to plucky noodling
circling around deeper thrusts.
Lyn Stanley: The Moonlight Sessions: Volume Two
(2017, A.T. Music): Standards singer. Pianists Mike Garson, Tamir
Handelman, and Christian Jacob get cover credit, but the ever so
tasteful backup musicians deserve more credit, and when you dig
into the fine print you find folks like Chuck Berghofer (bass),
Luis Conte (percussion), Hendrik Meurkens (harmonica), Carol
Robbins (harp), and most notably Ricky Woodard (tenor sax). They
aim for a midnight smolder, and the singer meets them there.
Stik Figa: Central Standard Time (2017, Mello Music
Group): Rapper John Westbrook Jr., from Topeka, Kansas. Nice bounce
to it. Nine cuts, 31:38, so a bit more than an EP.
Rain Sultanov: Inspired by Nature (2017, Ozella):
Saxophonist (soprano/tenor) from Azerbaijan, second album. Backed
by piano, cello, oud, bass, drums, and percussion, the take on
nature is vibrant and often quite lovely.
Summit Quartet: Live in Sant' Arresi (2016 ,
Audiographic): Two avant saxophonists, Ken Vandermark (tenor and
baritone) and Mats Gustafsson (just baritone), backed by Luc Ex
(bass) and Hamid Drake (drums). The saxophonists have always had
a knack for bringing out the ugly in each other, but usually avoid
such excess here.
Swet Shop Boys: Sufi La (2017, Customs, EP):
Anglo-American hip-hop duo -- or Indian-Pakistani if you trace them
back a generation -- Heems (Himanshu Suri, ex-Das Racist) and Riz MC
(Riz Ahmed, had a breakout acting role in The Night Of).
Dropped a terrific album last year, Cashmere, following it
up with this six track, 15:22 EP.
Fred Thomas: Changer (2017, Polyvinyl):
Singer-songwriter, formerly of His Name Is Alive and Saturday
Looks Good to Me, Discogs lists ten albums since 2002, starting
with Everything Is Pretty Much Entirely Fucked. Not so
bummed out here, the music scattered but most with some edge.
Nestor Torres: Jazz Flute Traditions (2017, Alfi):
Puerto Rican flautist, fifteen or so albums since 1981, covers
pretty much all of the bases here with pieces by Mann, Lateef,
and Kirk, standards, and Latin jazz favorites, opening with Moe
Kaufmann ("Swinging Shepherd's Blues") and closing with Irving
Fields ("Miami Beach Rhumba").
Trespass Trio: The Spirit of Pitesti (2015 ,
Clean Feed): One of Swedish saxophonist Martin Küchen's groups,
with Per Zanussi (bass) and Raymond Strid (drums), fourth group
album (odd fact: Küchen, with 23 albums listed by Discogs, is
the only one without a Wikipedia page). Pitesti is a town in
Romania that was the site of a notorious prison brainwashing
experiment. Seems to have bummed everyone out here.
Umphrey's McGee: Zonkey (2016, Nothing Too Fancy):
Group dates back to 1997 in South Bend, Indiana, alternately described
as a jam band and as a prog rock group. Discography is large, with 9
studio albums, 10 live albums, 4 videos, 2 EPs, and probably scads of
live bootlegs. These are mashups, evidently covered as they keep a
consistent guitar-heavy sound -- typical is a piece that bounces back
and forth between "Electric Avenue" (Eddy Grant) and "Highway to Hell"
(AC/DC). Sort of fun, but has its limits.
Unhinged Sextet: Don't Blink (2016 , OA2):
Recorded in Arizona, but band members teach all over the country.
Eight pieces by five members: Vern Sielert (trumpet), Will Campbell
(alto sax), Matt Olson (tenor sax), Michael Kocour (piano), Jon
Hamar (bass), Dom Moio (drums -- the only non-writer). Postbop,
no reason I can think of for the group name.
Vector Families: For Those About to Jazz/Rock We Salute You
(2017, Sunnyside): Minneapolis group, drummer Dave King the best known
(Bad Plus, Happy People), with Anthony Cox (bass), Dean Granros (guitar),
and Brandon Wozniak (sax). The rock allusions are far from obvious, even
when King explains their sound as "Ornette Coleman's Prime Time meets
Bad Brains with a bit of Pere Ubu" -- for one thing, time is completely
free, even when covering Ellington's "Satin Doll" (the piano sounds are
something Granros whipped up using "a Guitar Band video game controller").
They also cover Ornette.
Martti Vesala Soundpost Quintet: Helsinki Soundpost
(2016, Ozella): Finnish trumpet player, debut album (maybe just by
group), a quintet with tenor sax/flutes, piano, bass, and drums --
a classic hard bop lineup, but softer and more ornate, not a mix I
especially care for. But some fine trumpet leads.
Ken Wiley: Jazz Horn Redux (2014 , Krug
Park Music): French horn player, fourth album, groups shifts around
a lot from cut to cut, Bob Sheppard (tenor sax on three cuts) makes
me think Los Angeles. Lightweight, but still swings hard.
Carl Winther & Jerry Bergonzi: Inner Journey (2016
, SteepleChase LookOut): Danish pianist, son of the late trumpet
player Jens Winther (not to be confused with label head Nils Winther),
has a couple albums, wrote 6 (of 9) pieces pieces here, for a vigorous,
robust quartet. The star, of course, is the tenor saxophonist.
Nate Wooley: Knknighgh (Minimal Poetry for Aram Saroyan)
(2016 , Clean Feed): Avant trumpet player, records a lot, here
with a pianoless quartet: Chris Pitsiokos (alto sax), Brandon Lopez
(bass), Dre Hocevar (drums). I've forgotten whatever I once knew of
Saroyan's poetry, and none is actually used here -- at least in verbal
form, but I gather it was fragmented and abstract, something like the
Recent Reissues, Compilations, Vault Discoveries
Vincent Ahehehinnou: Best Woman (1978 , Analog
Africa): Name reversed on cover, as it is on most (but not all) of his
records, most co-credited with his band, L'Orchestre Poly-Rythmo de
Cotonou. Four-track vinyl reissue, runs 36:38, a satisfying length
for such amiable groove pieces.
James Luther Dickinson: I'm Just Dead, I'm Not Gone (Lazarus
Edition) (2006 , Memphis International): Born in Arkansas,
spent most of his life (1941-2009) in Memphis, best known as a record
producer but cut a dozen albums, including his groups Mudboy and the
Neutrons and Raisins in the Sun. His only album before 1986, Dixie
Fried, wasn't as good as the title promised, but as he aged he
turned into an amusing old weirdo. This was culled from a late live
date, introducing two sons in the band (aka, as the cover but not the
band intro notes, North Mississippi All-Stars). Reissued this year
bundled with a hardcover book -- Phil Overeem insists "READ THE BOOK."
Dick Hyman: Solo at the Sacramento Jazz Festivals 1983-1988
(1983-88 , Arbors): Pianist, a master of every piano style from
ragtime to swing, the most recognizable tunes here from Fats Waller.
Joe King Kologbo & the High Grace: Sugar Daddy
(1980 , Strut): Touted as "a lost Nigerian disco funk classic,"
the first of a promised series of "Original Masters" curated by
Duncan Brooker. I know essentially nothing about Kologbo or anyone
else on the album. Title cut runs 15:38, two more add up to 14:35.
A bit chintzy, but the grooves keep powering on.
Mono No Aware (2017, Pan): Sixteen previously unreleased
pieces of ambient electronica by as many artists, none I'm familiar with.
Mostly synth curtains with occasional muted chatter, not exactly fading
into the background, but probably better for that.
Sun Ra and His Astro Infinity Arkestra: My Brother the Wind
Vol. 1 (1969 , Cosmic Myth): Remastered and expanded
from a single 1970 album, this marks the point where the pianist-leader
discovered the Moog, and gets a little blip-crazy.
Sun Ra and His Astro Infinity Arkestra: My Brother the Wind
Vol. 2 (1969-70 , Cosmic Myth): Based on a 1971 album,
again remastered and expanded, with Sun Ra playing farfisa on half,
minimoog on the rest -- the former more playful, with an amusing
stretch of vocal.
Shina Williams & His African Percussionists: Agboju
Logun (1984, Strut, EP): Nigerian disco, just a 11:43 single
extended with an 11:39 "LP version" of the same.
Neil Young: Hitchhiker (1976 , Reprise): Part of
his archives series, effectively a demo session with Young trying out
various songs with just his guitar (or sometimes piano). Eight (of ten)
songs eventually appeared elsewhere: one edited for 1977's Decade
compilation, three on 1979's classic Rust Never Sleeps, the title
cut finally appearing on 2010's Le Noise. "Give Me Strength" is
the better of the unknowns (the rhymes are strained on "Hawaii"). I'm
most taken with his laconic take on "The Old Country Waltz."
Zaïre 74: The African Artists (1974 , Wrasse,
2CD): Live recordings from a big concert in Kinshasa, part of the
entertainment program but the "Rumble in the Jungle" fight between
Mohammad Ali and George Foreman. The roster is worthy -- Rochereau,
Franco, Orchestre Stukas, Abeti, and Miriam Makeba (opens with
"Mobuto Praise Song" -- thankfully not in English) -- and the
characteristic soar of soukous guitar paradise prevails.
Bee Gees: Bee Gees' 1st (1967, Atco): The three
Gibb brothers, born in Isle of Man, grew up in Manchester then
moved to Australia in 1958, cut their first singles in 1963 and
had two obscure albums before being re-introduced as a pop group
here (the first to receive a US release). One great single ("To
Love Somebody"), two more pretty decent ones, the filler straining
against the icky strings, often succumbing.
Bee Gees: Horizontal (1968, Atco): Second US
album, same basic string-driven formula but they left out the
hits -- only "Massachusetts" was released as a single in the
US, and while it has a minor hook, nothing else -- especially
the UK single "World" -- comes close.
Bee Gees: Idea (1968, Atco): The brightest idea here
was that someone learned to play guitar, evidently by listening to
Hollies records. Still, the strings return, as does the pomposity of
Bee Gees: Odessa (1969, Atco): Originally a double LP,
a rite of passage for ambitious '60s (and '70s) groups, although few
lived up to the hype. This one certainly doesn't. Tentative but finally
rejected titles include An American Opera and Masterpeace.
Songs include "Seven Seas Symphony" and "The British Opera," and their
longing for glory days of the British Empire is palpable.
Anthony Braxton: Quartet (Warsaw) 2012 (2012 ,
ForTune): One piece, "Composition 363b+," runs 70:05, with James
Fei on alto sax, the leader on alto and tenor, Tyler Ho Bynum on
cornet, and Erica Dicker on violin. Despite its abstraction, this
is a remarkable piece of music.
James Brown: Cold Sweat (1967, King): One new
single, a great one, in two parts, plus ten covers -- upbeat ones
on the front side power by His Famous Flames, ballads on the back
side that he redeems through extraordinary vocal athleticism.
Tim Buckley: Goodbye and Hello (1967, Asylum):
Singer-songwriter, started folkie on his debut but edging toward
baroque (or psychedelic) on his second album -- there are moments
I can imagine swapping in Grace Slick's voice. Elsewhere he mixes
in some intense exotic percussion and other surprises, although
it grows heavy and weary in the end.
Bulbul: Hirn Fein Hacken (2014, Exile on Mainstream):
Rock group from Austria, guitar-bass-drums, discography goes back
to 1997, caught my attention because drummer is Didi Kern, who also
plays in DEK Trio with pianist Elisabeth Harnik and avant-saxophonist
Ken Vandermark. Dense postpunk with a minor hint of jazz, lyrics
mostly in English, terse too.
DEK Trio: Burning Below Zero (2014 , Trost):
Ken Vandermark trio, recorded in Austria with two locals: Elisabeth
Harnik (piano) and Didi Kern (drums, listed as ddkern). Vandermark
has only rarely played with piano backup -- mostly Håvard Wiik in
their Giuffre-inspired Free Fall group -- but Harnik suits him,
probably because her fills add to the rhythm rather than harmonics.
Donovan: Sunshine Superman (1966, Epic): Scottish
folk-pop singer-songwriter Donovan Leitch, third album, the first
to get much attention in the US with its chart-topping title single.
First side filler is a bit weak, but second side picks up, leading
with "Season of the Witch."
Donovan: Mellow Yellow (1967, Epic): Title song
a second huge hit single, the "electric banana" a vibrator although
I recall investigating a rumor about smoking banana skins at the
time. Reverts to more folkie fair after that, although "Sunny South
Kensington" is pretty cheerful.
Kaleidoscope: Side Trips (1967, Epic): Byrds-flavored
psychedelic folk band, cut four albums 1967-70, best known member was
David Lindley (who in the 1980s cut a couple of retro-rock records I
liked, especially El Rayo-X) although Chris Darrow (who soon
moved on to Nitty Gritty Dirt Band) had a slight edge as a songwriter.
No real hits, but plenty of old-timey filler, like "Hesitation Blues,"
"Oh Death," "Come On In," and "Minnie the Moocher."
B.B. King: Blues Is King (1967, Bluesway): Live
from the International Club in Chicago, where he's introduced as
"the world's greatest bluesman." Raw, no shortage of intensity,
but that doesn't help the flow, or let songs stand out, like, say,
the slightly earlier Live at the Regal.
L'Orange & Stik Figa: The City Under the City
(2013, Mello Music Group): The former does beats, the latter raps.
Played it twice while thinking about something else, enjoyed it,
and have nothing more to say.
Mario Pavone: Sharpeville (1985 , Playscape):
The bassist's third album, originally released in 1988: with Marty
Ehrlich (alto/soprano sax, clarinet, flute/alto flute), Thomas Chapin
(alto sax, flute/bass flute), and Pheeroan Ak Laff (drums) named on
the cover, but also, on the title track, Mark Whitecage (alto sax),
Peter McEachern (trombone), and John Betsch (drums). Has its moments,
not least the bass solos, but they come and go.
Mario Pavone Nu Trio: Remembering Thomas (1999,
Knitting Factory Works): Thomas is presumably Chapin, the alto
saxophonist who died tragically at 41 the year before: Chapin
and Pavone were very closely linked, playing on virtually all
of each other's records for a decade. Still, these pieces were
all composed by Pavone and arranged for piano trio, with Peter
Madsen and Matt Wilson, marking Chapin's absence as much as his
Mario Pavone/Michael Musillami: Op.Ed (2001, Playscape):
Leaders play bass and guitar, and split the writing, but these aren't
duets: they're joined by Peter Madsen (piano) and Michael Sarin (drums).
Still, an especially good showcase for the guitarist.
Mario Pavone Nu Trio/Quintet: Orange (2003, Playscape):
The Nu Trio, of course, features Pavone and Peter Madsen, with Gerald
Cleaver taking over the drums. The trio cuts are first rate, but the
horns are more noticeable: Steven Bernstein (trumpet) and Tony Malaby
(tenor sax), with Bernstein arranging three pieces.
Saint Etienne: Good Humor (1998, Sub Pop): Fourth
album, a little sharper and shriller than their usual soft alt-dance
Saint Etienne: Sound of Water (2000, Sub Pop):
Fifth album, surprised to find it on Chris Monsen's 2017 list as it
is quite old. Still, soft and smart, mostly interchangeable with the
others I've heard.
Saint Etienne: Finisterre (2002, Mantra): Starts
stronger, ends wimpier, otherwise about par.
Saint Etienne: Travel Edition 1990-2005 (1991-2004
, Sub Pop): Best-of, rounded up to fifteen years in a shorter
package than the 2-CD London Conversations that appeared about
the same time. [16/18 cuts.]
The Serpent Power: The Serpent Power (1967, Vanguard):
San Francisco group, David Meltzer and Clark Coolidge originally poets,
Tina Meltzer singer, several others. Basically folkie, leaning toward
psychedelia, has trouble getting there.
Fred Thomas: Everything Is Pretty Much Entirely Fucked
(2002, Little Hands): First solo album, a side project while Thomas
was in the band Saturday Looks Good to Me. Mostly solo, a bit of
harmonica to go with the guitar, strained and bummed out, though he
picks up a trashy noise band toward the end ("When You Fuck Things
Up With Your Baby"). Two covers: one from Warn DeFever (His Name Is
Alive, another band Thomas played in), the other a remarkably pained
Brian Wilson's "Don't Worry."
Fred Thomas: All Are Saved (2015, Polyvinyl):
Skipping past titles like Turn It Down, Sink Like a
Symphony, and No Other Wonder (Seemingly Random Unreleased
Songs 1997-2012), this seems to have been the singer-songwriter's
breakthrough album (to the extent he's ever had one). One advance
is that he's using a lot more band power, adding to the sonic edge
while still keeping it personal.
Trio-X [Joe McPhee/Dominic Duval/Ray Rosen]: On Tour . . .
Toronto/Rochester (2001, Cadence): McPhee's long-running
avant trio with bass and drums, first recorded in 1999, continuing
at least through 2012 (Duval died in 2016). Four long cuts, including
"Try a Little Tenderness" and "My Funny Valentine," from Toronto, but
only 8:59 from the night before in Rochester. Opens on pocket trumpet,
switches to tenor sax, burning and smoldering, the bass and drums
only to serve, yet they have some of the best moments.
Trio-X [Joe McPhee/Dominic Duval/Jay Rosen]: Journey
(2003, CIMP): McPhee plays alto and tenor here, backed by bass and drums.
After all the storm and clang, ends with a lovely "Amazing Grace."
David S. Ware: Live in the Netherlands (1997 ,
Splasc(H)): Tenor saxophonist, playing solo back during the heyday
of his quartet. Four pieces, runs 39:07, inevitably limited in color
and rhythm, but a powerful, protean force.
Trevor Watts & Veryan Weston: At Ad Libitum
(2013 , ForTune): Improv duets, recorded live in Poland,
soprano/tenor sax and piano. Watts I recognize as one of the
founding figures in the English avant-garde. Weston came along
later, in the late 1980s, and has several duo albums with Watts,
Eddie Prévost, and Lol Coxhill -- mostly on Emanem, which kept
them off my radar. The soprano can be a little screechy, but
remarkable overall, especially impressed by the pianist.
The Youngbloods: The Youngbloods (1967, RCA
Victor): Another band on a folk-to-psychedelic rock tangent,
not to mention New York-to-San Francisco, originally Jesse
Colin Young and the Youngbloods, they sounded like a synthesis
of everyone else -- indeed, their biggest hit ("Get Together")
had previously been done by Jefferson Airplane, and only hit
on a reissue after being picked up as an advertising jingle.
The Youngbloods: Earth Music (1967, RCA Victor):
Second album, draws a little more on blues riffs for their own
songs, picks up three covers that stake out their outer limits:
Tim Hardin, Chuck Berry, Robin Remailly (you know, Unholy Modal
Everything streamed from Napster (ex Rhapsody), except as noted in
brackets following the grade:
- [cd] based on physical cd
- [cdr] based on an advance or promo cd or cdr
- [bc] available at bandcamp.com
- [yt] available at youtube.com
Monday, September 25. 2017
Music: Current count 28719  rated (+29), 398  unrated (+6).
As I'm writing this, there is no free disk space available to my
server account, so I won't be able to update the website. That was
the situation last night as well when I went to add my
Weekend Roundup post, but just in time a sliver opened up and I
was able to make the update -- my first in over a week (I was able
to sneak my post on
Phillips up by deleting a huge file and pushing the single
file up). If you're reading this (at least in the "faux blog" I
lucked out again. I dread having to move the website, but unless
something changes soon I'll have to. The problem isn't the static
files, which I have on my work machine. The big problem is the
blog, which will surely be lost. Due (I assume) to disk quotas
(or possibly some other bottleneck) I haven't been able to dump
the blog database for several years now. And the ISP, ADDR.COM,
has for all intents and purposes stopped providing any form of
support -- at this point it's rather surprising that they've even
kept the machines running. Oddly enough, I have been able to store
new blog posts lately, so that may still work.
As for this week's music, I'm surprised the rated count is as high
as it is. I got off to a very slow start last week. Surprisingly, the
two A- records this week were the first two I rated, and they got 5-6
plays each. I picked up some speed as I got into less interesting
albums, but what salvaged the week was a side effect of reading the
latest Rolling Stone paean to their birth year, 1967:
50 Essential Albums of 1967. This was written by David Fricke and
Robert Christgau, expanded a bit from their 2007 survey of the same year,
The 40 Essential Albums of 1967. Christgau had actually written a
Consumer Guide to 1967 back in 1977, the only such retrospective
Consumer Guide he ever wrote -- I added those entries to his
database, leaving a never-filled hole for 1968 and into 1969,
when he started writing his monthly columns.
I made a list and decided to check out the records I didn't have
ratings for, and picked up a few extras along the way. The closest
thing to a find was David Lindley's early band Kaleidoscope's
Side Trips, although the only songs that stuck in my head
afterwards were Donovan's two title singles and the Youngbloods'
"Get Together." Still, a surprising number of albums weren't on
Napster: Bobby "Blue" Bland's Touch of the Blues, The Four
Tops' Reach Out, B.B. King's The Jungle, Moby
Grape, The Best of Wilson Pickett, Procol Harum,
Diana Ross and the Supremes' Greatest Hits, Dionne Warwick's
Golden Hits/Part One -- just found James Brown's Cold
Sweat under "various artists," so next week for that.
No jazz on their list. I figured I could rectify that, but a quick
search through my database suggests that 1967 was a sub-par year for
jazz -- maybe the poorest of the decade. Major jazz labels went into
sudden decline after 1965, although there was a partial rebound in
1969 with the emergence of fusion and an avant-garde rebound, both
aided by new artists and labels in Europe. But for 1967 (and I could
be off slightly, as I'm more likely to have recording than release
dates in the database) I only count 2 A records and 15 A- (partial
checking revealed 2 more A- recorded in 1967 were released later).
- Duke Ellington: And His Mother Called Him Bill
- Johnny Hodges: Triple Play
- Miles Davis: Nefertiti
- Jackie McLean/Ornette Coleman: New and Old Gospel
- McCoy Tyner: The Real McCoy
- John Coltrane: Interstellar Space
- Jimmy Rushing: Every Day I Have the Blues
- Miles Davis: Sorcerer
- Stan Getz: Sweet Rain
- Gordon Beck: Experiments With Pops
- Don Ellis: Electric Bath
- Antonio Carlos Jobim: Wave
- Keith Jarrett: El Juicio (The Judgment)
- Pete La Roca: Turkish Women at the Bath
- Bobby Hutcherson: Oblique
- Thad Jones/Mel Lewis: Live at the Village Vanguard
- Tony Scott: Tony Scott
No progress to report on Jazz Guides. The Streamnotes draft file
for September has 122 reviews. I should post it this week, no later
than the end of month (Saturday), if I can get the website working.
Quite a bit of new jazz in the queue right now -- partly because I
managed to account for today's mail from Lithuania. I'd hate to see
the unrated count top 400 again, so I should focus more there. One
reason I slacked off last month was that most of the new records
had much later release dates. Of course, with September waning,
we're nearly there.
New records rated this week:
- Gabriel Alegria Afro-Peruvian Sextet: Diablo en Brooklyn (2017, Saponegro): [cd]: A-
- Richard X Bennett: Experiments With Truth (2017, Ropeadope): [cd]: B+(**)
- Richard X Bennett: What Is Now (2017, Ropeadope): [cd]: B+(**)
- Jean-François Bonnel and His Swinging Jazz Cats: With Thanks to Benny Carter (2017, Arbors): [r]: B+(**)
- Tomas Fujiwara: Triple Double (2017, Firehouse 12): [cd]: A-
- Philipp Gerschlauer/David Fiuczynski: Mikrojazz: Neue Expressionistische Musik (2016 , Rare Noise): [cdr]: B+(*)
- Lauren Kinhan: A Sleepin' Bee (2017, Dotted i): [cd]: B
- Florian Hoefner: Coldwater Stories (2016 , Origin): [cd]: B+(**)
- Emi Meyer: Monochrome (2009-16 , Origin): [cd]: B+(*)
- Debbie Poryes Trio: Loving Hank (2017, OA2): [cd]: B+(**)
- Franciszek Pospieszalski Sextet: 1st Level (2016 , ForTune): [bc]: B
- Umphrey's McGee: Zonkey (2016, Nothing Too Fancy): [r]: B+(**)
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries rated this week:
- Dick Hyman: Solo at the Sacramento Jazz Festivals 1983-1988 (1983-88 , Arbors): [r]: B+(***)
- Sun Ra and His Astro-Infinity Arkestra: My Brother the Wind Vol. 1 (1969 , Cosmic Myth): [r]: B+(**)
- Sun Ra and His Astro-Infinity Arkestra: My Brother the Wind Vol. 2 (1969-70 , Cosmic Myth): [r]: B+(**)
Old music rated this week:
- Bee Gees: Bee Gees' 1st (1967, Atco): [r]: B
- Bee Gees: Horizontal (1968, Atco): [r]: C
- Bee Gees: Idea (1968, Atco): [r]: C+
- Bee Gees: Odessa (1969, Atco): [r]: C
- Tim Buckley: Goodbye and Hello (1967, Asylum): [r]: B+(*)
- Donovan: Sunshine Superman (1966, Epic): [r]: B+(**)
- Donovan: Mellow Yellow (1967, Epic): [r]: B+(**)
- Kaleidoscope: Side Trips (1967, Epic): [r]: B+(***)
- B.B. King: Blues Is King (1966 , Bluesway): [r]: B+(**)/li>
- The Serpent Power: The Serpent Power (1967, Vanguard): [r]: B
- The Youngbloods: The Youngbloods (1967, RCA Victor): [r]: B+(*)
- The Youngbloods: Earth Music (1967, RCA Victor): [r]: B+(**)
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Rez Abbasi: Unfiltered Universe (Whirlwind): November 10
- Bobby Bradford/Hafez Modirzadeh: Live at the Magic Triangle (NoBusiness): CDR
- Chévere (Parma)
- Mark Dresser: Modicana (NoBusiness): CDR
- Harris Eisenstadt/Mivos Quartet: Whatever Will Happen That Will Also Be (NoBusiness): CDR
- Yedo Gibson/Hernâni Faustino/Vasco Trilla: Chain (NoBusiness)
- Andrew Lamb/Warren Smith/Arkadijus Gotesmanas: The Sea of Modicum (NoBusiness): CDR
- Roberto Magris Sextet: Live in Miami @ the WDNA Jazz Gallery (JMood)
- Rudresh Mahanthappa's Indo-Pak Coalition: Agrima (self-released): CDR, October 21
- Liudas Mockunas: Hydro (NoBusiness): CDR
- Mostly Other People Do the Killing: Paint (Hot Cup): October 20
- Teri Parker: In the Past (self-released): October 20
- Wadada Leo Smith: Solo: Reflections and Meditations on Monk (TUM): October 20
- Wadada Leo Smith: Najwa (TUM): October 20
- Charles Thomas: The Colors of a Dream (Sea Tea)
- Ton-Klami [Midori Takada/Kang Tae Hwan/Masahiko Satoh]: Prophecy of Nue (1995, NoBusiness)
Sunday, September 24. 2017
Biggest news for me is that the server I use for TomHull.com is
wedged, with no disk space available for uploading updates. I may
(or may not) be able to insert this post into the blog software
(which I've had problems with in the past, but evidently uses its
own separate storage), but cannot update the "faux blog" (which
I've been linking to for the last year-plus). The ISP, Addr.com,
seems to be on auto-pilot, with all of their support tools broken
and no one responding even to email. I know I've threatened this in
the past, but I suppose I have to bite the bullet and move the site.
That will be a pain for me, and disruptive for the world -- as if I
don't have enough problems already.
Some fairly large topics I have nothing on below: Hurricane Maria
and the mass destruction of Dominica and Puerto Rico; devastating
earthquakes in Mexico; elections in Germany which gave the far-right
AfD party seats in parliament; the never-ending Russia investigation
(starring Paul Manafort and Facebook this week); Betsy DeVos' latest
efforts to make college a safe haven for rapists; a revised anti-Muslim
travel ban; the ongoing protests against
police brutality and injustice in St. Louis (special hat tip to Greg
Magarian and Bronwen Zwirner on the ground there); and, of course, the
big deal of protesting the national anthem at NFL football games (and
Trump's hate tweets against those who do) -- the latter is the subject
of the first five articles at Slate, and evidently the top trending
hashtag(s) at Twitter (Jeffrey Goldberg tweet: "The President of
the United States is now in a war with Stephen Curry and LeBron
James. This is not a war Trump will win").
Some more reviews of Hillary Clinton's What Happened and
comments on the 2016 election:
Glenn Greenwald: The Clinton Book Tour Is Largely Ignoring the Vital Role
of Endless War in the 2016 Election Result:
Part of that is the discomfort of cognitive dissonance: the Democratic
branding and self-glorification as enemies of privilege, racism, and
violence are directly in conflict with the party's long-standing eagerness
to ignore, or even actively support, policies which kill large numbers of
innocent people from Pakistan, Libya, and Somalia to Yemen, Iraq, and Gaza,
but which receive scant attention because of the nationality, ethnicity,
poverty, distance, and general invisibility of their victims.
Actually, Hillary gets hurt in several ways: because she always rose
to support the wars, no one can identify with her as a war critic; because
she was actually in office during much of this time (as senator and especially
as secretary of state) she bears some responsibility for the failure of the
wars to accomplish their proclaimed goals; and the simple fact is that after
15 years of continuous war Americans are poorer and meaner than they would
have been otherwise, and Republicans feed on that.
Katherine Krueger: Hillary Clinton Will Never Understand What Happened:
Those looking for mea culpas will get them, but only up to a point,
and always closely followed by qualifications. . . . She then pivots
to consider the "strong headwinds" her scrappy little $623 million
campaign-that-couldn't was up against. . . .
Most of all, Clinton can't understand why young voters were won over by
Sen. Bernie Sanders. And it is here where the essential cynicism underlying
her worldview -- and which ultimately played a key role in her doom --
comes most sharply into focus. For Clinton, politics are fundamentally
about pragmatism, where strategic concessions and horse-trading with
Republicans necessarily means sacrificing ideals for the ultimate good
of Getting (Some) Things Done. To her, change within the system is needed
and worthy, but the system itself can never change. . . .
After a career built on steadfastly upholding the status quo, Clinton
didn't share the anger of the people she sought to govern, because, to
her, the state of the U.S. is not something to be angry about. Even as
she criss-crossed the country talking with veterans and moms and immigrants,
their problems were never her problems. As her fellow Americans continue
to lose their jobs and homes and fall into medical debt and struggle with
opioid addictions, the system Clinton has for years fought to keep intact
is humming along just fine. The fact that racism, militarism, inequality,
and religious fundamentalism pervade this country, or that poor people
are being consumed by the gears of our economy and left exhausted in its
dust, is not something to get "angry" about. In Clinton's words, "It's
always been thus."
Jon Schwartz: Hillary Clinton doesn't understand why the corporate media
is so bad:
The New York Times, CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, et al., are gigantic corporations --
in most cases owned by even larger ones. And the job of giant corporations
is not to inform American citizens about reality. It's not to play a hallowed
role in the history of a self-governing republic. It's to make as much profit
as possible. That in turn means the corporate media will never, ever be
"liberal" in any genuine sense and will be hostile to all politicians who
feint in that direction.
From that perspective, the media's performance in 2016 was a shining,
glorious success. As Les Moonves effused just as the primaries were
starting, Donald Trump's campaign was "good for us economically. . . . Go
Donald! Keep getting out there!" The entire Hieronymus Bosch-like nightmare,
said Moonves, "may not be good for America, but it's damn good for CBS."
CNN made $1 billion in profits during the election year, far more than
Matthew Yglesias: What really happened in 2016, in 7 charts: The
key one is the monumental unpopularity of both candidates. Still, in
that comparison, the odd thing is that Trump ranks much worse than
Clinton, yet more people who disliked Trump voted for him than people
who disliked Clinton voted for her. Why was that? My best guess is
that having no real track record, people significantly underestimated
how damaging Trump would be, whereas she was much more of a known,
and one of the main things you knew was she would be dogged by and
endless procession of (mostly) fake scandals as long as she was in
the public eye. Trump exploited this by asking the question: "what
have you got to lose?"
Joshua Holland: How Right-Wing Media Played the Mainstream Press in
the 2016 Election: Not on Hillary's book, but this is the piece
she should have read before writing up her excuses.
Some scattered links this week:
Andrew J Bacevich: Past All Reason: Review of the 18-hour Ken
Burns-Lynn Novick documentary The Vietnam War and, to some
extent, the war itself. The series remains focused on its American
audience, going out of its way to stress the patriotism and idealism
of American soldiers (though less so of America's political leaders
and generals). But it shies away from war propaganda, mostly because
they make extensive use of Vietnamese voices (from all sides) and
video -- putting human faces on people long caricatured in American
Burns and Novick pay surprisingly little attention to why exactly
the United States insisted on butting in and why it subsequently
proved so difficult to get out. Their lack of interest in this
central issue is all the more striking given the acute misgivings
about a large-scale US intervention that Lyndon Johnson repeatedly
expressed in the fateful months between late 1964 and early 1965.
The anguished president doubted that the war could be won, didn't
think it was worth fighting, and knew that further expansion of US
involvement in Vietnam would put at risk his cherished Great Society
domestic-reform program. . . . Despite his reservations, Johnson --
ostensibly the most powerful man in the world -- somehow felt compelled
to go ahead anyway. Yet Burns and Novick choose not to explore why
exactly Johnson felt obliged to do what he did not want to do.
Our present situation makes the question all the more salient.
The US war in Afghanistan, although smaller in scale than the war
in Vietnam, has dragged on even longer. It too has turned out to be
a misbegotten enterprise. When running for the presidency, Donald
Trump said as much in no uncertain terms. But President Trump --
ostensibly the most powerful man in the world -- has not turned
his skepticism into action, allowing America's longest war to
continue. . . . As Trump has affirmed, even (or perhaps especially)
presidents must bow to this pernicious bit of secular theology.
According to Burns and Novick, the American war in Vietnam was
"begun in good faith, by decent people." It comes closer to the truth
to say that the war was begun -- and then prolonged past all reason --
by people who lacked wisdom and, when it was most needed, courage.
Whereas I found the first four episodes valuable, the biases in the
fifth (January-July 1967) started to get out of hand. It's not clear
yet whether Burns-Novick will wind up adopting the position that the
only reason the US lost in Vietnam was that the American people let
the Vietnamese down -- the early episodes seemed to recognize that
the American neo-colonial project never had a chance, but their take
on the Tet Offensive suggests the opposite. Also, as is still the
case in St. Louis today, their cameras love to seek out violence in
antiwar protests, and their narrative goes out of its way to stress
the that there was still much pro-war support -- what Nixon would
come to call "the silent majority" (something I expect we'll hear
much more about in later episodes).
Sarah Kliff: I've Covered the GOP repeal plans since day one.
Graham-Cassidy is the most radical. It surely says something
about rank-and-file Republicans these days that each and every
time their "repeal-and-replace" bills fail to pass, they go back
to the drawing board to come up with something even more damaging.
While other Republican plans essentially create a poorly funded version
of the Affordable Care Act, Graham-Cassidy blows it up. The bill offered
by Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham and Bill Cassidy takes money from
states that did a good job getting residents covered under Obamacare
and gives it to states that did not. It eliminates an expansion of the
Medicaid program that covers millions of Americans in favor of block
grants. States aren't required to use the money to get people covered
or to help subsidize low- and middle-income earners, as Obamacare does
Plus, the bill includes other drastic changes that appeared in some
previous bills. Insurers in the private marketplace would be allowed
to discriminate against people with preexisting conditions, for example.
And it would eliminate the individual mandate as other bills would have,
but this time there is no replacement. Most analysts agree that would
inject chaos into the individual market.
The right has employed the back-to-the-states scam before, but it
strikes me as especially explosive here: whereas now we have a unified
national debate about health care policy, this bill will turn health
care info a burning issue for fifty state political contests -- an
area where Republicans have gained considerable power recently not
least due to the widespread perception that states don't matter much.
That strikes me as a big political risk: both to their own control in
competitive states, and because at least some blue states will use
those block grants to implement single-payer schemes (not that they
won't be inhibited by cutbacks and other regulations).
More on the Graham-Cassidy health care bill:
Bob Cesca: Lisa Murkowski's bribe -- and the GOP's shameless health
Alan Fram: Graham-Cassidy Co-Sponsor's State Gets Special Medicaid
Carve-Out: That would be Ron Johnson, of Wisconsin.
Jimmy Kimmel: new Obamacare repeal bill flunks the Jimmy Kimmel Test:
Not a lot of jokes here, but a pretty strong description of the bill, and
why Bill Cassidy is a liar. Also see the follow up:
Jimmy Kimmel: Sen. Cassidy "either doesn't understand his own bill or he
lied to me", and
Jimmy Kimmel vs. Cassidy, round 3: "If these guys would tell the truth . . .
I wouldn't have to".
Anna North: The New Obamacare repeal bill is the worst yet for women's
Dylan Scott: Senate Republicans tweak Graham-Cassidy in latest bid to win
Kelly Swanson: What every major health group has said about Graham-Cassidy:
American Medical Association, American Academy of Pediatrics, AARP, Blue
Cross Blue Shield Association, eight more.
Matthew Yglesias: The staggering hypocrisy of Bill Cassidy and Lindsey
Graham: Points out that both Senators had previously established
themselves as voices for reason in the GOP's "repeal-and-replace" efforts,
but then: "Their bill brazenly casts aside all of their previous doubts,
featuring the most slipshod legislative process yet and no guarantee of
adequate coverage whatsoever. And neither of them has bothered to explain
why they changed their minds." Actually, Steven Rosenfeld has come up
with one explanation, at least for Graham: see
Senate Republicans want to provide a death blow to any future health
Simon Maloy: McCain saves the GOP: Then John McCain withdrew his
initial wobbly support for Graham-Cassidy and vowed to vote against
the bill, pretty much killing it (assuming at least one of Collins and
Murkowski, who have both voted against every "repeal-and-replace" bill
so far steps up). McCain, of course, has reaped much praise for his
independence and integrity here, but I suspect other Republicans (Jeff
Flake and Dean Heller seem likely) wanted to torpedo the bill without
being seen as the ones who did it. As I noted above, kicking health
insurance back to fifty states greatly magnifies the political impact,
turning races in each of those states into referendums on access to and
affordability of health care, while major federal funding cuts cripples
many options. McCain's crucial votes against "repeal-and-replace" would
seem to satisfy the Pareene test (see
Alex Pareene: I Don't Want to Hear Another Fucking Word About John McCain
Unless He Dies or Actually Does Something Useful for Once). Still:
Mehdi Hasan: Despite what the press says, "Maverick" McCain has a long
and distinguished record of horribleness.
Jordan Weissmann: Obamacare Repeal Might Be Dead. Trump's Effort to
Sabotage the Law Is Very Much Alive.
Fred Kaplan: Trump's Reasons for Scrapping the Iran Deal Are the Definition
of Self-Destructive. Also see the Trita Parsi pieces below.
John Nichols: Bernie Sanders Just Gave One of the Finest Speeches of
His Career: "Outlining a vision of an America on the side of peace
and justice, the senator shredded Trump's brutish foreign policies."
Sanders gave his speech at Westminster College in Fulton, Missouri --
the site of several famous world affairs speeches, including the one
in 1946 when Winston Churchill coined the term "iron curtain," to some
extent starting the Cold War. This is especially noteworthy because
Sanders has long shied away from challenging the precepts of American
foreign policy. Some more links:
Sanders' speech stands in especially stark contrast to Trump's UN
speech. For more on that, see:
Evan Osnos: The Risk of Nuclear War With North Korea: A long "letter
from Pyongyang," which Osnos recently visited for a tightly guided tour.
While he wasn't able to meet many people, or see many things, that
first-person experience gives him a leg up on Trump, his generals,
Nikki Haley, or pretty much anyone else in the administration. The
portrait he paints of Kim Jong Un is actually pretty scary, but the
balance of terror is firmly if cavalierly dominated by Washington.
There is also scattered support for a less confrontational option,
a short-term deal known as a "freeze for freeze." North Korea would
stop weapons development in exchange for a halt or a reduction in
U.S.-South Korean military exercises. Proponents say that a freeze,
which could be revoked if either side cheats, is hardly perfect, but
the alternatives are worse. Critics say that versions of it have been
tried, without success, and that it will damage America's alliance
with the South. Thus far the Trump Administration has no interest.
"The idea that some have suggested, of a so-called 'freeze for freeze,'
is insulting," Nikki Haley, the U.N. Ambassador, said before the
Security Council on September 4th. "When a rogue regime has a nuclear
weapon and an ICBM pointed at you, you do not take steps to lower your
Outside the Administration, the more people I talked to, the more
I heard a strong case for some level of diplomatic contact. When Obama
dispatched James Clapper to Pyongyang, in 2014, to negotiate the release
of two prisoners, Clapper discovered that North Korea had misread the
purpose of the trip. The government had presumed that he was coming in
part to open a new phase in the relationship. "They were bitterly
disappointed," he said. Clapper's visit convinced him that the absence
of diplomatic contact is creating a dangerous gulf of misperception.
"I was blown away by the siege mentality -- the paranoia -- that prevails
among the leadership of North Korea. When we sabre-rattle, when we fly
B-1s accompanied by jet escorts from the Republic of Korea and Japan,
it makes us feel good, it reassures the allies, but what we don't factor
in is the impact on the North Koreans."
The striking thing about the Haley quote is how easily North Korea
could justify taking the same stance. North Koreans surely recall that
prominent US generals advocating nuking Korea during the 1950-53 war.
And while it's only been since the 1960s that the US has had ICBMs
capable of hitting Korea, the US has had conventional bombers within
striking distance since that war. So what gives us the right to insist
that North Korea lower its guard? If it's that the US should be trusted,
that isn't a very convincing argument. Another quote:
Our grasp of North Korea's beliefs and expectations is not much better
than its grasp of ours. To go between Washington and Pyongyang at this
nuclear moment is to be struck, most of all, by how little the two
understand each other. In eighteen years of reporting, I've never felt
as much uncertainty at the end of a project, a feeling that nobody --
not the diplomats, the strategists, or the scholars who have devoted
their lives to the subject -- is able to describe with confidence how
the other side thinks. We simply don't know how Kim Jong Un really
regards the use of his country's nuclear arsenal, or how much North
Korea's seclusion and mythology has distorted its understanding of
American resolve. We don't know whether Kim Jong Un is taking ever-greater
risks because he is determined to fulfill his family's dream of retaking
South Korea, or because he is afraid of ending up like Qaddafi.
More on Korea this week:
John Feffer: It's Time to Make a Deal With North Korea.
David McNeill: Unknown to most Americans, the US 'totally destroyed' North
Korea once before.
Choe Sang-Hun: Kim's Rejoinder to Trump's Rocket Man: 'Mentally Deranged
U.S. Dotard': OK, most of us had to look up "dotard," but looks like
it's pretty apt. Kathleen Geier's tweet on this piece: "Honestly, the
Taylor Swift-Kim Kardashian feud is being conducted on a far higher
level than this."
Trita Parsi: Trump is conflating Pyongyang with Tehran. The results could
be catastrophic. If Trump had any good sense, he'd be trying to work
out a deal with North Korea patterned on Obama's Iran Deal, although it
might be harder now given that the US had a deal with North Korea like
that, negotiated by Jimmy Carter in the 1990s and trashed by GW Bush in
2002, shortly before Bush added insult to injury with his "axis of evil"
speech. Instead, Trump seems determined to drive Iran towards becoming
another North Korea. (Also see:
Jeffrey Lewis: If Trump kills the Iran deal, he may give the world
another Rocket Man.) Parsi also wrote
Netanyahu Is Meeting Trump to Push for War With Iran.
A recent poll shows that Trump is especially untrusted by Americans
to deal with North Korea (see
Trump seen by 66 percent in US as doing more to divide than united
country): the "trust to act responsibly handling North Korea"
is 37% favorable, 62% negative, compared to which US military leaders
score 72-27% favorable. The notion that military leaders are both
competent and trustworthy is widely held, though I'd be hard pressed
to cite any evidence showing it should be. One cautionary piece is:
Stephen Kinzer: America's Slow-Motion Military Coup. He notes that
"given the president's ignorance of world affairs, the emergence of a
military junta in Washington may seem like welcome relief," then goes
on to offer some reasons to worry. There's been much talk of a coup
since Trump took office, but that seems unlikely as long as Trump lets
the junta do whatever they want. The only time I've actually worried
that the military brass might move against civilian government was when
Clinton was elected in 1992, but his surrender to the chiefs was so
complete they didn't have to flex a muscle. Obama proved to be every
bit as supine, not even bothering to replace Bush's Secretary of
Defense (although after Gates quit, he went through a series of safe
names: Leon Panetta, Chuck Hagel, and Ash Carter).
Gary Rivlin/Michael Hudson: Government by Goldman: "Gary Cohn is
giving Goldman Sachs everything it ever wanted from the Trump
administration." Important, in-depth article, goes well beyond
explaining why Cohn hasn't resigned in disgust, which he certainly
felt after Trump's embrace of the Nazis in Charlottesville.
There's Ultimately no great mystery why Donald Trump selected Gary Cohn
for a top post in his administration, despite his angry rhetoric about
Goldman Sachs. There's the high regard the president holds for anyone
who is rich -- and the instant legitimacy Cohn conferred upon the
administration within business circles. Cohn's appointment reassured
bond markets about the unpredictable new president and lent his
administration credibility it lacked among Fortune 100 CEOs, none of
whom had donated to his campaign. Ego may also have played a role.
Goldman Sachs would never do business with Trump, the developer who
resorted to foreign banks and second-tier lenders to bankroll his
projects. Now Goldman's president would be among those serving in
his royal court.
Who can say precisely why Cohn, a Democrat, said yes when Trump
asked him to be his top economic aide? No doubt Cohn has been asking
himself that question in recent weeks. But he'd hit a ceiling at
Goldman Sachs. In September 2015, Goldman announced that Blankfein
had lymphoma, ramping up speculation that Cohn would take over the
firm. Yet four months later, after undergoing chemotherapy, Blankfein
was back in his office and plainly not going anywhere. Cohn was 56
years old when he was invited to Trump Tower. An influential job
inside the White House meant a face-saving exit -- and one offering
a huge financial advantage. . . .
The details of the president's "$1 trillion" infrastructure plan
are similarly favorable to Goldman. As laid out in the administration's
2018 budget, the government would spend only $200 billion on infrastructure
over the coming decade. By structuring "that funding to incentivize
additional non-Federal funding" -- tax breaks and deals that privatize
roads, bridges, and airports -- the government could take credit for
"at least $1 trillion in total infrastructure spending," the budget reads.
It was as if Cohn were still channeling his role as a leader of Goldman
Sachs when, at the White House in May, he offered this advice to executives:
"We say, 'Hey, take a project you have right now, sell it off, privatize
it, we know it will get maintained, and we'll reward you for privatizing
it.'" "The bigger the thing you privatize, the more money we'll give you,"
continued Cohn. By "we," he clearly meant the federal government; by "you,"
he appeared to be speaking, at least in part, about Goldman Sachs, whose
Public Sector and Infrastructure group arranges the financing on large-scale
public sector deals.
Jon Schwartz: The History Channel is finally telling the stunning secret
story of the War on Drugs: A four-part documentary. Much of it seems to
involve the CIA, which has repeatedly forged alliances with drug traffickers --
in Laos, Nicaragua, and most recently in Afghanistan.
That core truth is: The war on drugs has always been a pointless sham.
For decades the federal government has engaged in a shifting series of
alliances of convenience with some of the world's largest drug cartels.
So while the U.S. incarceration rate has quintupled since President
Richard Nixon first declared the war on drugs in 1971, top narcotics
dealers have simultaneously enjoyed protection at the highest levels
of power in America.
This might be a good place to mention
Sheelah Kolhatkar: The Cost of the Opioid Crisis -- an awful piece
which tries to quantify the economic costs of opioid overdoses by toting
up lost hours worked and similar metrics. I don't doubt that these deaths
add up to some kind of crisis, but you need to back up a bit and frame
this issue in terms of two much larger, less acute crises: one is the
"war on drugs," which has accomplished little other than to make people
really stupid about what drugs do; the other is the for-profit health
care system, which has veered inconsistently on pain management, doing
first too little then too much and probably, if the crisis-mongers get
their way, reverting to too little. The big money is in prescribing
pills, not in monitoring treatment.
Matt Taibbi: The Madness of Donald Trump: Starts by noting that
Trump's August 22 speech in Phoenix was "Trump's true coming-out party
as an insane person." Goes on to try to draw fine distinctions between
Campaign Trump, who was crazy in ways that seemed to work, and President
Trump, whose craziness is becoming more and more dysfunctional. After
considering the possibility that America deserves Trump, he pulls out
the DSM and comes up with a diagnosis:
Everyone with half a brain and a recent copy of the DSM (the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, used by
shrinks everywhere) knew the diagnosis on Trump the instant he joined
the race. Trump fits the clinical definition of a narcissistic personality
so completely that it will be a shock if future psychiatrists don't
rename the disorder after him.
Grandiosity, a tendency to exaggerate achievements, a preoccupation
with "fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty or ideal
love," a belief in one's specialness (which can only be understood by
other special people), a need for excessive admiration and a sense of
entitlement -- sound like anyone you know?
Trump's rapidly expanding list of things at which he's either a
supreme expert or the Earth's best living practitioner would shame
even great historical blowhards like Stalin or Mobutu Sese Seko.
Taibbi's points on Trump's losing war with the English language
are more to the point (though "he makes George W. Bush sound like
Vladimir Nabokov" shows how quickly we forget). He tries to take
some comfort by viewing Trump as just desserts for a country with
so much blood and oppression staining its history, but Trump's too
deranged to deliver a lesson on karma. For more on the madness, see:
Alex Morris: Trump's Mental Health: Is Pathological Narcissism the Key
to Trump's Behavior? One note here deserving caution is a study
that "found that 18 of the first 37 presidents met criteria for having
a psychiatric disorder," although some ailments, like depression, "do
not typically lead to psychosis or risky decision-making." More
interesting is this paragraph:
When it comes to presidents, and perhaps all politicians, some level
of narcissism is par for the course. Based on a 2013 study of U.S.
presidents from Washington to George W. Bush, many of our chief
executives with narcissistic traits shared what is called "emergent
leadership," or a keen ability to get elected. They can be charming
and charismatic. They dominate. They entertain. They project strength
and confidence. They're good at convincing people, at least initially,
that they actually are as awesome as they think they are. (Despite
what a narcissist might believe, research shows they are usually no
better-looking, more intelligent or talented than the average person --
though when they are, their narcissism is better tolerated.) In fact,
a narcissist's brash leadership has been shown to be particularly
attractive in times of perceived upheaval, which means that it
benefits a narcissist to promote ideas of chaos and to identify a
common enemy, or, if need be, create one.
I've long noted something like this: the tendency of people in
times of crisis to rally around whoever seemed to be the most
self-confident. I figure that's something we learned in our early
evolution, something that back in primitive times worked well
enough it didn't get erased through natural selection. However,
in modern times such "emergent leaders" rarely turn out to be
By the way, Taibbi has another piece out:
Steve Bannon Splits From Trump: Hilarity Ensues. This is about
the Republican Senatorial primary runoff between Luther Strange,
who was appointed to fill Jeff Sessions' seat and is backed by
Trump and McConnell, and Roy Moore, the former judge with the Moses
complex who is backed by Bannon. In this contest, you'd have to
say that Strange is the lesser evil, but the margin is so thin I
find it hard to care. I'm even tempted to think that we might be
better if they elect the greater embarrassment (Moore), although
that's pretty much what happened with Trump.
By the way, there are more Alabama races down ballot. See:
Christina Cauterucci: Some of the US's Creepiest Anti-Abortion Men
Are Running for Office in Alabama.
Wednesday, September 20. 2017
I was dawdling on Facebook last night, and clicked on "Notifications,"
wondering what (if anything) that might do. I scrolled down the widget,
and noticed that someone I didn't recognize commented on something I
had written, so I was curious and clicked. That someone was the sister
of Bill Phillips, telling me that he had died back in January. I got
a Facebook notice that Bill's birthday was June 3, so (something I
don't often do) I sent him a little note. The response came on June
8, but . . . well, I checked my email trash and there was no mention
of it among 1628 deleted Facebook messages. Somebody's algorithm sure
sucks. I should have noticed something was amiss when he stopped
posting after January 3, but I just didn't pay that much attention,
even less than usual this year.
I first met Bill around 1978-79. I was working for a typesetting shop
in New York City, and the co-owner decided to buy a computer and hire
a consultant to set up an accounting system. The computer was a low-end
PDP-11, and Bill was the consultant (or maybe just the guy the consultant
assigned to do the work). At the time I was trying to read electronics
textbooks, thinking I might go back to college and study engineering.
I was making slow progress, especially on the analog stuff, but at some
point I picked up a book on programming in Pascal and it seemed like
the easiest thing in the world. I decided to buy a personal computer.
My first choice was something called the Pascal Microengine, but when
the dealer couldn't deliver, I settled for an Apple II. I wrote some
trivial programs in Basic, but my real interest was designing my own
typesetting systems software. I talked to Bill about this, and we
wound up pitching the co-owner on the idea. He gave us an allowance
to buy some hardware, and I wrote a 300-page functional spec for a
distributed, networked multinode editing ("front end") system.
By the time we gave up on the project, Bill had steered me toward
programming in C and using an editor called MINCE (a recursive acronym
for "MINCE Is Not Complete Emacs" -- basically, a text editor inspired
by Richard Stallman's LISP-based EMACS editor, written in C to run on
a Z-80 microprocessor). MINCE came with partial source code, and the
documentation was the author's Master's Thesis. Both turned out to be
remarkably fine tutorials, and Bill was my first brilliant mentor. I
left Wizard in 1980 and landed a job as a Software Engineer at Varityper
in East Hannover, NJ. Varityper made "direct-entry" phototypesetters,
which set type incrementally as you keyed the text and commands in.
But they had just started a project to build a multi-user system not
unlike the one I had designed, so they hired me to consult on that,
then wound up throwing a number of tricky programming assignments my
way. I spent the next three years there, then moved to Massachusetts
to work for Compugraphic, their largest competitor, and a year later
moved on to a start-up working on color prepress software for package
design: Contex Graphics Systems.
While I was learning lots of new things in my various jobs, Bill
was mostly stuck babysitting legacy systems in New York, which left
him in something of a rut. We kept in touch over those years: not
close, but I knew he was having trouble finding work in New York,
and that he was especially fond of Boston. When I started taking
on management duties, I had the opportunity to hire a couple of
consultants, so I offered Bill a job, and a place to stay until we
turned it into a regular job, and he and his wife Jane moved to
Cambridge. Over the next couple years, Contex went through a lot
of ownership trouble, eventually being sold to Xyvision shortly
before their main business ("tech pubs" systems, again similar to
my original design) crashed. I had to lay Bill off then, and I don't
think he ever made much of a living again. But Jane had found a
decent job, he loved Cambridge, and he was very active in local
computer clubs, so he was reasonably content. I saw him socially,
and tried to rope him into my Ftwalk project, but he resisted.
After I left Massachusetts and wound up back in Kansas, I picked
his brain for various projects -- among other things, he made a
Jane died in late 2011 he moved back to New York. I saw him at least
three times there -- most recently in June 2016. He had gotten into
political interests, adopting "XCIX" as his middle name to signify
solidarity with the 99%, and was the first person I knew to get
involved in the Bernie Sanders campaign. For some reason we had
never talked about politics back in our initial period -- though
we talked a lot about music (not that we had much in common: he
turned me on to some quality folk music, but by then he was mostly
into new age, and I was more into punk, funk, and avant-jazz).
First inkling I had of his politics must have been in 1989 when
Abbie Hoffman died, and Jane (I think it was) suggested they should
go to the funeral to show solidarity. I didn't get the impression
they had a direct connection, but that does say something about
where they came from. As I'm writing this, I realize there's so
much about him I don't know. He was born in Queens, a few years
older than me but I'm not sure how many -- not a lot -- and was
living in Queens when I first met/visited him. His mother was still
alive when he moved back to New York. He had two sisters, I think,
but I never met either. They had a son, who was close to ten when
I first met him. Went to college in Binghampton, and at least for
a while turned into a Dead Head. Last I knew they didn't seem to
be close, but I don't think I ever met the son as an adult. Toward
the end he seemed worn and weary, and felt trapped. He talked like
he might leave New York, possibly for Washington State, but I doubt
he had the energy.
I do remember lots of little things. He always had a beard, which
I can't remember not being grizzled white but it may have been blond
way back when. He always looked rumpled, moving slow and speaking
softly. He liked model trains and western shirts -- had a whole
rack of them bought mail-order from Sheplers, the famous outfitter in
my own home town. (I had a few myself, though I regarded them more as
a joke. But I don't think I ever saw his trains.) He used the alias
"Old Professor Bear," and called his web business Shoestring Projects.
He spent most of his
disposable income on books and records, especially books, and lived
in a constant state of hopeless clutter -- no doubt a big part of the
reason he had such trouble picking up and moving. I was taken aback
at one point when he was at Contex and I noticed the title, How
to Work for a Jerk -- but I already owned the same title.
He liked assembly code, working "close to the machine," and his
favorite programming stories were clever optimizations. At one point
I was taken with the ideal of "simple and elegant." He came back with:
"but why make something simple and elegant when you can make it complex
and wonderful." Not really the words of a first-rate engineer, but he
made a marvelous mentor, and a fine friend. One of the sweetest, most
generous people I've ever known.
I'm really staggered that we've lost him.
Monday, September 18. 2017
Music: Current count 28690  rated (+40), 392  unrated (+16).
Did almost nothing last week but listen, all jazz except for a couple
items Phil Overeem recommended in tweets, only three albums coming from
my recently expanding CD queue. The majority (22+5/40) of the records
were Clean Feed/Shhpuma releases I never got in the mail -- I just brought
up their 2017 releases pages and found it all on Napster, so easy enough.
Nothing bad or especially good there: high was two B+(***), low three B.
I rather expected more given that I had previously logged six A- records
on Clean Feed (three on CD, three streamed). I don't believe this includes
their September releases (I have some email on such, but lately they've
gotten into making life difficult).
I did manage a push forward on compiling the Jazz Guide(s) last week.
Up to John Hébert in the
Jazz Post-2000 file (39%),
which brings the post-2000 guide to 1140 pages. I was at 29% a week ago,
so if I keep up the slog I still have six weeks to go (plus the groups
I've shunted to the side). I'm still estimating it will hit 1500 pages,
although the estimating formula I've been using shows it a bit shorter
(1375, down from 1425, but that doesn't account for group entries).
By the way, some very bad political news since yesterday's already grim
John McCain announced he will "regrettably" vote for the Graham-Cassidy
ACA repeal (see
Arizona Governor Backs O'care Repeal, Likely Securing McCain's and Flake's
Votes). The Graham-Cassidy bill is in many ways even worse than the
previous Repeal/Replace bills, reminding us that as with the House bills,
the key to getting more Republican support is to make the legislation
even more vicious.
Perhaps even more disturbing is this report:
U.S. warns that time is running out for peaceful solution with North
Korea. I think the last time that precise headline was used was
1914: "Austria-Hungary warns that time is running out for peaceful
solution with Serbia." By the way, it was Rex Tillerson delivering
the threat. Isn't he supposed to be the adult in the Trump playpen?
Slightly less ominous but still way past the cusp of sanity, there's
a picture of Trump and Netanyahu shaking hands under the title
Trump on Withdrawing From Iran Nuclear Deal: 'You Will See Very
Of course, we've seen plenty of hints already of these things, but
it's part of human nature to discount worst-case scenarios.
New records rated this week:
- Alfjors: Demons 1 (2015 , Shhpuma, EP): [r]: B+(**)
- Chino Amobi: Paradiso (2017, NON): [r]: B
- Michaël Attias Quartet: Nerve Dance (2016 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(***)
- Chamber 4: City of Light (2016 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(**)
- Zack Clarke: Random Acts of Order (2017, Clean Feed): [r]: B+(*)
- Kaja Draksler Octet: Gledalec (2016 , Clean Feed, 2CD): [r]: B
- Harris Eisenstadt Canada Day Quartet: On Parade in Parede (2016 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(**)
- Mats Gustafsson & Craig Taborn: Ljubljana (2015 , Clean Feed): [r]: B
- João Hasselberg & Pedro Branco: From Order to Chaos (2017, Clean Feed): [r]: B+(*)
- Honest John: International Breakthrough (2015-16 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(**)
- Humcrush: Enter Humcrush (2014-15 , Shhpuma): [r]: B+(**)
- Kokotab: Flying Heart (2016 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(**)
- Luis Lopes: Love Song (2015 , Shhpuma): [r]: B
- Tony Malaby/Mat Maneri/Daniel Levin: New Artifacts (2015 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(**)
- Luís José Martins: Tentos -- Invenções E Encantamentos (2017, Shhpuma): [r]: B+(*)
- Meridian Trio: Triangulum (2016 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(*)
- Mind Games [Angelika Niescier/Denman Maroney/James Ilgenfritz/Andrew Drury]: Ephemera Obscura (2013 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(**)
- MIR 8: Perihelion (2017, Shhpuma): [r]: B+(*)
- Jonah Parzen-Johnson: I Try to Remember Where I Come From (2017, Clean Feed): [r]: B+(**)
- Mario Pavone: Vertical (2016 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(***)
- The Rempis Percussion Quartet: Cochonnerie (2015 , Aerophonic): [cd]: A-
- Dave Rempis: Lattice (2017, Aerophonic): [cd]: B+(***)
- ROVA Saxophone Quartet/Kyle Bruckmann/Henry Kaiser: Steve Lacy's Saxophone Special Revisited (2015 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(*)
- Vitor Rua and the Metaphysical Angels: Do Androids Dream of Electric Guitars? (2017, Clean Feed, 2CD): [r]: B+(*)
- Rune Your Day: Rune Your Day (2016 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(**)
- The Angelica Sanchez Trio: Float the Edge (2016 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(**)
- The Selva: The Selva (2016 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(*)
- Matthew Shipp Quartet: Not Bound (2016 , ForTune): [bc]: A-
- Tommy Smith: Embodying the Light: A Dedication to John Coltrane (2017, Spartacus): [r]: A-
- Wadada Leo Smith/Natsuki Tamura/Satoko Fujii/Ikue Mori: Aspiration (2016 , Libra): [cd]: B+(**)
- David Stackenäs: Bricks (2013 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(*)
- Rain Sultanov: Inspired by Nature (2017, Ozella): [r]: B+(**)
- Trespass Trio: The Spirit of Pitesti (2015 , Clean Feed): [r]: B+(*)
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries rated this week:
- Vincent Ahehehinnou: Best Woman (1978 , Analog Africa): [r]: B+(**)
Old music rated this week:
- Anthony Braxton: Quartet (Warsaw) 2012 (2012 , ForTune): [bc]: A-
- Mario Pavone: Sharpeville (1985 , Playscape): [r]: B+(*)
- Mario Pavone Nu Trio: Remembering Thomas (1999, Knitting Factory Works): [r]: B+(***)
- Mario Pavone/Michael Musillami: Op.Ed (2001, Playscape): [r]: B+(**)
- Mario Pavone Nu Trio/Quintet: Orange (2003, Playscape): [r]: B+(***)
- Trevor Watts & Veryan Weston: At Ad Libitum (2013 , ForTune): [bc]: B+(***)
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Lena Bloch & Feathery: Heart Knows (Fresh Sound New Talent): September 25
- Collective Order: Vol. 2 (self-released): September 29
- Corey Dennison Band: Night After Night (Delmark)
- Ghost Train Orchestra: Book of Rhapsodies Vol II (Accurate): October 20
- Gordon Grdina Quartet: Inroads (Songlines)
- Eric Hofbauer: Prehistoric Jazz Volume 4: Reminiscing in Tempo (Creative Nation Music): November 3
- Dylan Jack Quartet: Diagrams (Creative Nation Music): September 22
- Matt Mitchell: A Pouting Grimace (Pi): September 29
- Roscoe Mitchell: Duets With Anthony Braxton (1976, Sackville/Delmark)
- Ian O'Beirne's Slowbern Big Band: Dreams of Daedelus (self-released)
- Chris Parker: Moving Forward Now (self-released): October 6
- Tom Rainey Obbligato: Float Upstream (Intakt)
- Irène Schweizer/Joey Baron: Live! (Intakt)
- Sky Music: A Tribute to Terje Rypdal (Rune Grammofon)
- Lyn Stanley: The Moonlight Sessions: Volume Two (A.T. Music): October 6
- Trio S: Somewhere Glimmer (Zitherine)
- Tal Yahalom/Almog Sharvit/Ben Silashi: Kadawa (self-released)
Sunday, September 17. 2017
This has been another week when I could have spent every waking
hour compiling stories and still not covered it all. There is nothing
below on Korea, where there have been new missile tests, new even more
vicious sanctions, and the usual threats of nuclear annihilation --
one story I was tempted by was on how the new UN sanctions attempt
to choke off North Korean exports of clothing (evidently one of their
major sources of foreign currency). Nothing on Nikki Haley's bluster,
nor on Trump's forthcoming UN speech. Nothing on Burma's attacks on
the Rohynga. (Wasn't opening up Burma Hillary Clinton's big coup as
Secretary of State?) Nothing on US threats to close the embassy in
Cuba. Only the most general comments on Yemen-Syria-Iraq. Nothing
on Israel/Palestine, which ever deeper into an abyss of inhumanity,
even while Netanyahu and family are in legal trouble. Nothing on
the latest ISIS bombing in London, nor on Trump's inane tweets about
it. Very little on the big hurricane season, other natural disasters,
and how well (or more likely miserably) the feds are dealing with
them. Nothing on voter suppression (although Kris Kobach has been
busy on that front). Nothing on Jeff Sessions refusal to investigate
civil rights abuse in St. Louis, nor on protests against same, nor
on Missouri's governor's preference for meeting protests with a show
of military force. Nothing on Harvard's failed chemistry experiment,
where they tried to mix Mike Pompeo and Chelsea Manning. Nothing
on the Russia investigation, where an interesting side-story has
developed over Facebook advertising. Very little on so-called tax
reform. Nothing on rape on college campuses, although Betsy De Vos
seems to be set on making it more difficult to punish. Nothing on
DACA, not even Trump's alleged DACA deal with Democrats nor the
way Republicans blew up after it was reported. And I'm sure there
were dozens of other stories I could have found worthy.
On the other hand, maybe there's too much on Hillary Clinton's
campaign memoir, What Happened, and also on the Democrats'
intra-party struggles. Perhaps that has something to do with our
preoccupation with talk-about-talk. But most other stories just
add to the cumulative weight of moral rot in the Trump regime.
The new books by Clinton (in her backhanded way) and Sanders
(much less reviewed, probably because it's much less gossipy)
point forward -- as does Sanders' new "Medicare for All" bill
(please stop calling it "Berniecare").
Just before posting, I noticed this piece by Jay Rosen:
Normalizing Trump: An incredibly brief explainer. It offers
a short list of things "most every journalist who covers Trump
- He isn't good at anything a president has to do.
- He doesn't know anything about the issues with which he must
- He doesn't care to learn.
- He has no views about public policy.
- Nothing he says can be trusted.
- His "model" of leadership is the humiliation of others.
He adds: "If nothing the president says can be trusted, reporting
what the president says becomes absurd." That reminded me of a piece
I noticed but didn't figure was worth pursuing -- until it became
Elliot Hannon: A Ranking of Trump's Sunday Morning Tweets From Least
to Most Insane.
Some scattered links this week:
Dean Baker: Adults in the Room: The Sordid Tale of Greece's Battle
Against Austerity and the Troika: Review of former Greek finance
minister Yanis Varoufakis's book, Adults in the Room. The Troika
is the European Commission (EC), the European Central Bank (ECB), and
the International Monetary Fund (IMF). Greece had run up large debts
then fell into a major depression after 2007, losing 25% of its GDP --
all the worse because Greece had joined the Eurozone, leaving it at
the mercy of an EU dominated by Germany. To make good on those debts,
the Troika was set on forcing Greece into extreme austerity, combined
with massive privatization of public assets -- a "solution" that
Varoufakis understood not merely to be vicious but untenable. What
happened is little short of gruesome.
Ross Barkan: Universal healthcare in America? Not a taboo now, thanks
to Bernie Sanders: Sanders introduced his "Improved Medicare for
All" last week, remarkably co-sponsored by sixteen Democratic Senators.
Other related links:
Ariel Dorfman: A Tale of Two Donalds: Dorfman wrote a seminal
essay, a masterpiece of Marxist cultural criticism, back in 1971,
How to Read Donald Duck, one I read
avidly when it was translated (and, if memory serves, published in
Radical America). Here he updates his analysis to encompass
that other Donald. I suppose some times history repeats itself,
first as farce and then as tragedy. Other recent TomDispatch pieces:
Here's a sample quote from Sjursen:
Take a good, hard look at the region and it's obvious that Washington
mainly supports the interests of Israel, the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia,
Egypt's military dictator, and various Gulf State autocracies. Or
consider the actions and statements of the Trump administration and
of the two administrations that preceded it and here's what seems
obvious: the United States is in many ways little more than an air
force, military trainer, and weapons depot for assorted Sunni despots.
Now, that's not a point made too often -- not in this context anyway --
because it's neither a comfortable thought for most Americans, nor a
particularly convenient reality for establishment policymakers to
broadcast, but it's the truth. . . .
While President Trump enjoyed a traditional sword dance with his
Saudi hosts -- no doubt gratifying his martial tastes -- the air forces
of the Saudis and their Gulf state allies were bombing and missiling
Yemeni civilians into the grimmest of situations, including a massive
famine and a spreading cholera epidemic amid the ruins of their
impoverished country. So much for the disastrous two-year Saudi war
there, which goes by the grimly ironic moniker of Operation Restoring
Hope and for which the U.S. military provides midair refueling and
advanced munitions, as well as intelligence.
Engelhardt notes how a president supposedly obsessed with winning
has surrendered his administration to three of America's "losingest
generals": H.R. McMaster, John Kelly, and "Mad Dog" Mattis. For
instance, consider McMaster:
Then-Colonel H.R. McMaster gained his reputation in 2005 by leading
the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment into the Iraqi city of Tal Afar and
"liberating" it from Sunni insurgents, while essentially inaugurating
the counterinsurgency tactics that would become the heart and soul of
General David Petraeus's 2007 "surge" in Iraq.
Only one small problem: McMaster's much-publicized "victory," like
so many other American military successes of this era, didn't last.
A year later, Tal Afar was "awash in sectarian violence," wrote Jon
Finer, a Washington Post reporter who accompanied McMaster into that
city. It would be among the first Iraqi cities taken by Islamic State
militants in 2014 and has only recently been "liberated" (yet again)
by the Iraqi military in a U.S.-backed campaign that has left it only
partially in rubble, unlike so many other fully rubblized cities in
the region. In the Obama years, McMaster would be the leader of a
task force in Afghanistan that "sought to root out the rampant
corruption that had taken hold" in the American-backed government
there, an effort that would prove a dismal failure.
Meanwhile, see if you can discern any hope in these recent reports
Helene Cooper: US Says It Has 11,000 Troops in Afghanistan, More Than
Rod Nordland: US Expands Kabul Security Zone, Digging in the Next
Mujib Mashal: US Plan for New Afghan Force Revives Fear of Militia Abuses;
Max Fisher/Amanda Taub: Why Afghanistan's War Defies Solutions.
Thomas Frank: Hillary Clinton's book has a clear message: don't blame
me: Clinton's campaign memoir, What Happened, was released
last week, generating enough publicity to put her back in the spotlight.
Before publication we were treated to various sections where she tried
to blame Bernie Sanders and/or his supporters for her loss, which fit
in with the general perception that she's not one to take responsibility
for her own mistakes. I haven't looked at the book, and have no desire
to read it, so I don't know how fair those charges are. But really, one
could write a huge book about Hillary and all the ways the world has
treated her unfairly -- to her advantage as well as to her detriment.
Frank, too, tells us more about his own focus on populism, although
this seems likely to be a fair summary:
She seems to have been almost totally unprepared for the outburst of
populist anger that characterized 2016, an outburst that came under
half a dozen different guises: trade, outsourcing, immigration, opiates,
deindustrialization, and the recent spectacle of Wall Street criminals
getting bailed out. It wasn't the issues that mattered so much as the
outrage, and Donald Trump put himself in front of it. Clinton couldn't.
To her credit, and unlike many of her most fervent supporters, Hillary
Clinton doesn't deny that this web of class-related problems had some
role in her downfall. When she isn't repeating self-help bromides or
calumniating the Russians she can be found wondering why so many
working-class people have deserted the Democratic party.
This is an important question, and in dealing with it Clinton writes
a few really memorable passages, like her description of a grotesque
campaign stop in West Virginia where she was protested by a crowd that
included the former CEO of the company that owned the Upper Big Branch
mine, where 29 coal miners died in 2010.
But by and large, Clinton's efforts to understand populism always
get short-circuited, probably because taking it seriously might lead
one to conclude that working people have a legitimate beef with her
and the Democratic party.
Countless inconvenient items get deleted from her history. She only
writes about trade, for example, in the most general terms; Nafta and
the TPP never. Her husband's program of bank deregulation is photoshopped
out. The names Goldman Sachs and Walmart never come up.
Besides, to take populism seriously might also mean that Bernie
Sanders, who was "outraged about everything," might have had a point,
and much of What Happened is dedicated to blasting Sanders for
challenging Clinton in the Democratic primaries. Given that he later
endorsed her and even campaigned for her, this can only be described
as churlish, if not downright dishonest.
That Clinton might have done well to temper her technocratic style
with some populist outrage of her own only dawns on her towards the
end of the book, by which point it is too late.
Not to mention impossible. Hillary Clinton simply cannot escape
her satisfied white-collar worldview -- compulsively listing people's
academic credentials, hobnobbing with officers from Facebook and Google,
and telling readers how she went to Davos in 1998 to announce her
Other posts on Clinton's book:
James Fallows: Why Hillary Clinton's Book Is Actually Worth Reading:
"It's the rare interesting work by a politician -- and it offers an
important critique of the press." Fallows stresses how often Hillary
does take responsibility for losing, although when he quotes
her, you get this (Fallows' emphasis):
I don't understand why there's an insatiable demand in many quarters
for me to take all the blame for losing the election on my own shoulders
and quit talking about Comey, the Russians, fake news, sexism, or anything
else. Many in the political media don't want to hear about how those
things tipped the election in the final days. They say their beef is
that I'm not taking responsibility for my mistakes -- but I have, and
I do again throughout this book. Their real problem is that they
can't bear to face their own role in helping elect Trump, from
providing him free airtime to giving my emails three times more
coverage than all the issues affecting people's lives combined.
Hadley Freeman: America's vitriol towards Clinton reveals a nation
mired in misogyny: But is it really? No doubt there are pockets
of misogyny that somehow escaped the women's liberation movement of
the 1970s and the growing feminist consciousness which has largely
settled into common sense, much as there are pockets of racism left
untouched by the 1960s civil rights movement. And clearly, Clinton
brings misogynistic slurs to the forefront, if only because those
who most hate her lack the imagination to craft anything new --
much as many of those who hated Obama reverted to racist vitriol.
On the other hand, had she won -- which she would have if only the
constitution's framers put a little more care into how elections
work -- we'd be complimenting ourselves for how enlightened we've
become (much as we did with Obama's election in 2008). Granted,
that Donald Trump, as unreconstructed a racist/sexist as we can
imagine these days, sure looks like a setback, but could there
be some other reason?
Sarah Leonard: What Happened by Hillary Clinton review -- entertainingly
mean but essentially wrong-headed: For example:
It feels tiresome to explain this, but many Americans consider bankers
the enemy, and voters wanted her to pick a side. The fact that she
couldn't see that reveals a fundamental problem with her politics. And
it isn't symbolic -- America's particular form of political corruption
is rarely a simple exchange of cash for laws. Instead, as a famous
Princeton study has shown, wealthy institutions like banks exercise
substantial influence over legislative outcomes through the softer
power of lobbying and campaign donations, while average people and
their institutions exercise almost none. It is laughable that an
American politician would be indignant about her right to accept
money from banks. . . .
She primarily attributes her loss to what she calls "tribal
politics" -- a blend of racism, sexism and economic discontent --
and FBI director James Comey's press conference days before the
election. She may be right about Comey shifting enough white swing
voters to ultimately cost her the race. But Clinton's relationship
to populism is more complicated.
"Tribal" isn't the word I would choose for racism and sexism,
but there is something primitive about those traits. However,
economic discontent is something quite different, something that
only looks quaint and irrational if you're able to make ten years
average wages for a single speech to bankers.
Sophia A McClennen: The great Hillary Clinton paradox:
As Clinton blames Sanders for disrupting the party and causing
"lasting damage" to her campaign she fails to notice the various
advantages she had. From her biased treatment by the DNC to the
superdelegates to her $150 million war chest (twice Trump's) to
the backing of mega-stars from Bruce Springsteen to Beyoncé to
Oprah to her massive list of media endorsements, Clinton had
plenty of support. She had more endorsements from newspapers
than either Reagan or Obama.
This brings me back to the paradox. There is no doubt that
Trump ran a sexist campaign, but that doesn't mean that the
Sanders campaign was sexist too. And there is no doubt that
some of those who voted for Trump are sexist, but not all of
McClennan then cites
Emily Ekins: The Five Types of Trump Voters: the type Ekins dubs
American Preservationists are closest to the racist/sexist/xenophobic
stereotype, but they only number 20% of Trump voters (not that such
views don't lap over into other "types"). Still, the "lasting damage"
Sanders wrought has an Emperor's New Clothes air: it assumes
that no one would have noticed that Hillary wasn't an immaculate
progressive if only Sanders hadn't pointed out her shortcomings.
There is some truth to this: I, for instance, had early on resigned
myself to her inevitability, mostly because I thought that she alone
among Democrats could raise the sort of money necessary to compete
with the Kochs. Obviously, her fundraising prowess came at a cost,
which had been painfully evident over the last four Democratic
presidential terms, but it wasn't hard to imagine how much worse
any name Republican would be. Sanders changed my calculus, not by
telling me anything I didn't already know about Clinton, but simply
by offering better policies, and backing them up with a credible
history of integrity that Clinton lacked.
Still, this raises an interesting question: if Clinton actually
thought that Sanders had undermined her in the primaries, why didn't
she make a more dramatic effort to heal the chasm, specifically by
making Sanders her running mate? Granted, she did give up some ground
on the platform, but personnel is a more serious predictor of policy
than campaign platitudes. It wouldn't have been an unusual move, and
Sanders would have been an asset to the campaign (unlike Tim Kaine,
who at best helped a little in Virginia). Like Gore in 2000 when he
picked Joe Lieberman, and like Bill Clinton in 1992 when he picked
Gore, Hillary signaled with her VP pick that she was going to go
her own way, paying no heed and owing no debts to the "democratic
wing of the Democratic Party." So, again like Gore, she now finds
herself blaming the left for her own campaign's shortfall after her
bad bet that there were more money and votes to be had by snubbing
the left than by embracing it.
McClennan also wrote:
A tale of two leaders of the left: New books by Bernie Sanders and
Hillary Clinton emphasize their differences.
Jeff Spross: This Hillary Clinton would've won: Specifically,
this hinges on the book's revelation that Hillary considered pushing
for a Universal Basic Income (UBI) scheme.
David Roberts: Hillary Clinton's "coal gaffe" is a microcosm of her
twisted treatment by the media: Even more than her "basket of
deplorables" comment, Hillary singles her taken-out-of-context "We're
going to put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business"
as the one comment she regrets most. Still, had the media put the one
line in its actual context (even just its paragraph), and noted that
Clinton was proposing a $30 billion plan to help communities hit by
the declining coal market rebuild their economies, her comment may
not have been interesting, but shouldn't have been crippling. Still,
the media, prodded by right-wing agitators, made it so:
There is one and only one reason to pluck out that sentence and make
a story of it: to try to hurt Clinton politically by lying about her
meaning and intentions. . . .
From the media's perspective, "Clinton garbled a sentence" is true
but not particularly newsworthy. "Clinton boasted about putting coal
miners out of work" is false but definitely newsworthy (and damaging
to Clinton) if it were true. In other words, there's no honest reason
to make this "gaffe" a story at all. . . .
Right-wing operatives and media figures watch Clinton intensely.
Anything she says or does that can be plausibly (or implausibly) spun
to appear maleficent, they spin. A vast echo chamber of blogs, "news"
sites, radio stations, cable news shows, and Facebook groups takes
each one of these mini faux scandals and amplifies the signal.
If one of the faux scandals catches on enough and dominates
right-wing media long enough, then a kind of alchemy occurs. The
question facing mainstream outlets is not, "Why aren't you writing
about what Clinton said?" That question is easy to answer: It's a
nothingburger. The question becomes, "Why aren't you writing about
the scandal over what Clinton said?"
Reputable mainstream journalists don't have to pretend that
Clinton meant the ridiculous thing right-wing media says she meant.
They can just report that "some interpreted Clinton to mean
[ridiculous thing]," and hey, that's technically true. The fact
that a bunch of right-wing political and media hacks feigned
outrage becomes the story.
Jon Schwarz: Hillary Clinton Doesn't Understand Why the Corporate
Media Is So Bad:
Then there's Clinton's peculiar affection for the New York Times. Yes,
she says, it has often viewed her "with hostility and skepticism," but
"I've read the Times for more than 40 years and still look forward to
it every day. I appreciate much of the paper's terrific non-Clinton
reporting." . . .
Since Clinton has no structural critique of the press, why does she
believe she was so badly mauled in 2016? The only explanation she
presents is that the rules are different for her personally. . . .
In the end, Clinton's ideas about the media demonstrate that, more
than anything, she badly needed to watch the Noam Chomsky documentary
"Manufacturing Consent" or get a subscription to the Fairness and
Accuracy in Reporting newsletter. Then she could have approached her
campaign with fewer illusions, and with a much greater chance of winning.
Instead, she's left with the bitter observation that the press "want
me to stop talking. If it's all my fault, then the media doesn't need
to do any soul searching." But that's the whole point: The corporate
media doesn't have a soul. It just has a balance sheet.
Jeffrey St. Clair: Hillary Happened: The late Alexander Cockburn's
Mini-Me, better known recently for his virulent, supposedly left-wing
attacks on Bernie Sanders, manages to save some bile for Hillary and
her book, occasionally managing to be witty -- to no small part because
Hillary's never looked much good from the left, even against the vile
backdrop of attacks from the right. Favorite line: "Clinton was miscast
from the beginning as a political candidate for elected office. Her
skills and temperament were more suited to the role of political
enforcer in the mode of Thomas Cromwell or John Ehrlichman."
Rebecca Traister: Hillary Clinton Is Finally Expressing Some Righteous
Anger. Why Does That Make Everyone Else So Mad?
People have been reacting with atavistic censure to Hillary Clinton
for decades, and she's been expected to simply absorb it all without
returning fire. There are shirts, as she writes in What Happened,
that feature an image of Trump holding her bloody severed head aloft;
others, which she doesn't mention, read "Hillary Sucks, But Not Like
You can disagree with Clinton; you can reasonably acknowledge that
some of her pique does sound defensive. But she's not lying; she's not
inciting violence. She's not freaking out about crowd size or claiming
that antifa protesters are as bad as neo-Nazis or suggesting that
protesters be taken away on stretchers.
Shea Wong: Let's talk for a second about #ImWithHer . . .: I
was steered to this twitter thread by Robert Christgau (via
DailyKos), who tweeted:
Hillary haters owe it to history and their own integrity to read this.
She's not perfect. You're totally fucked up.
I'm not sure Bob would count me among the "Hillary haters" -- I
voted against her in two caucuses, but voted for her against Trump,
and didn't consider any of those choices to be close calls. To say
"she's not perfect" omits volumes of serious detail -- although
nothing I couldn't personally overlook compared to Trump. On the
other hand, I do know people who swear they'd never vote for her --
not that any of them hated her enough to vote for Trump. Still, I
take offense that they, let alone we, are "totally fucked up." They
are, for starters, people who can be counted on to oppose senseless,
fruitless wars that Hillary has always been eager to support -- and
that one might reasonably expect her to start in the future. I don't
agree with their voting decision, but I have to respect them: at the
end of the day, they're comrades, while Hillary skews somewhere
between "lesser evil" and "lesser good." Still, I'm open to reading
something that makes a case for her -- indeed, many of the reviews
I've cited in this section give her credit. But this thread is
something quite different. This isn't "excellent" (as hpg put it),
or enlightening, or even coherent, and I have to wonder about sane.
Obviously much of problem is twitter, both for chunking and for the
nine distracting and irrelevant videos Wong inserted. As best I can
discern, Wong's rant boils down to two salient points: Hillary was
the victim of a vile and unrelenting torrent of misogynistic smears,
and that was mostly the fault of Bernie and the left ("We watched
progbros parrot trump talking points, and vice versa, to the point
if you covered avatar/bio you couldn't tell the difference"). Wong
then concludes: "If she could be torn down that easily. So could
any of us." I'm not sure Wong is right even on the first point. By
far the most effective attack was the "Crooked Hillary" meme. One
might dispute this, especially in comparison to Trump, but it has
nothing to do with her gender. The second point is certainly false,
running opposite to the very principles that define the left, and
continued harping on it by diehard Hillary fans reeks of old-fashioned
liberal red baiting.
Josh Marshall: More Thoughts on the Intra-Democratic Divide: Meant
as a follow-up to his commentary on Ta-Nehisi Coates'
The First White President
Thoughts on the First White President). To oversimplify a bit,
Coates argues that racism remains the fundamental dividing line in
American politics, one that cannot be erased by cleverly attempting
to fashion a class-based appeal to working class Trump supporters.
Marshall looks to have it both ways: agreeing that Coates is right
on racism, but still stressing the need to recapture some Trump
supporters, probably by appealing to them on economic grounds --
but he kind of makes a muddle out of it. Let's try to clear up
- "Identity politics" will always be with us: it's the default
mode of most voters -- not necessarily just "low information" but
it's especially prevalent there. Unless you know better, the safe
and sensible vote is to follow the people you identify with --
usually people most like yourself. Everyone does it. I know a
good deal more about politicians than most folk, but every now
and then I find myself choosing between two people I don't know
anything substantial about, so I fall back on my prejudices --
the most common identity there is partisan, and while I don't
especially identify with Democrats, I've learned that Republicans
are dangerous (and often demented).
- Of course, it's just as easy to vote against categories you
don't identify with, and political parties have found it efficient
to focus on that. The Republican Party was founded on the interests
of independent farmers and manufacturers ("vote yourself a homestead,
vote yourself a tariff") but given its solid Northern protestant
homogeneity soon took to rallying against its opponents, deriding
the Democrats as the party of "rum, Romanism and rebellion." In
the 1970s, Richard Nixon and the architects of The Emerging
Republican Majority saw an opportunity to expand the party's
base to pick up two major blocks of white Democrats: protestants
in the South and catholics (mostly) in the North. They used coded
appeals to racism, but wrapped them up with God and guns and sheer
avarice into a package that was very flattering to their targets,
and repulsive to the groups they rallied against. The latter had
little choice but to align with the Democrats, even if it wasn't
clear what they were supporting. The key point here is that the
Democrats didn't deliberately build their recent coalition: as
with their late-nineteenth-century coalition, they got the odds
and ends after the Republicans had seized the middle ground.
- In both centuries, it appeared as though Republican efforts
to rally its chosen people against the margins was destined to
run against demographic trends -- mostly driven by immigration.
Republican identity politics found its greatest success in the
1920s, with prohibition and a hard turn against immigration. In
recent years, some Democratic Party strategists have started to
flirt with their own identity politics, calculating that the
groups the Republicans have left them with will grow into a new
Democratic majority. This idea is attractive to Democratic Party
elites because it lets them think they can bank on winning votes
without having to offer the voters tangible value.
- As usual, the Republicans have been on the leading edge of
this dynamic. As Thomas Frank pointed out in What's the Matter
With Kansas?, Republican elites had constructed a scam where
the base would vote for causes they were passionate about (guns,
anti-abortion, anti-immigrant) but all elected Republicans would
do is to cater to their donor class. Since Frank wrote, the GOP
has seen an upheaval as the base have forced their concerns onto
the party agenda. Nowhere has this been more drmatic, much to our
detriment, than here in Kansas. As Frank pointed out in Listen,
Liberal, the same elite/mass split exists in the Democratic
Party -- it's easy to note Democratic governors and majors who are
every bit as deep in donor pockets as the most corrupt Republicans
(e.g., Andrew Cuomo and Rahm Emmanuel). And indeed, what we saw in
2016 was a rank-and-file revolt against the elites of both parties --
unsuccessful, sure, because Clinton was still able to keep enough
Democrats in line, and because Trump was a fraud, but both served
notice that the gap between what parties run on and what they try
to deliver needs to close.
- Republican identity politics never recognized as such because
the white protestants (and later catholics) that made up their core
were so ubiquitous -- until recently, when they've become minorities
in many urban areas, including the nation's most booming economies.
This added a sense of fear, urgency, and despair to the Trump vote,
and the result was a small but significant shift in the white vote
against the Democrats, especially away from the coasts. Democrats
are divided on this: some argue that Democrats should focus more on
class (economics, inequality) to broaden their base to bring back
some of those white voters; others regard the white voters as lost
causes, atavisms, who will fade away as the nation becomes ever more
urban and globalized. Some of the former have characterized the
latter as "engaging in identity politics" -- this strikes me as
misguided and self-destructive.
- At this point we can dispense with the Republicans, aside from
noting that Republican rule invariably ends not from demographic
misjudgments but from corruption and disastrous economic crashes
that (temporarily anyhow) expose the folly of their pro-business
ideology -- on the other hand, Democratic rule usually ends when
people get a sense of recovery and stability, and grow reckless
and fickle again.
- The Democratic Party is divided today, with the emergence of
a faction which focuses on reducing inequality and securing real
economic gains for the vast majority of the American people, and
another which caters to wealthy urban liberals and promises to
somehow protect various targets from vicious Republican attacks.
The former still lack power in the party, although their grass
roots visibility has grown significantly over the past year. The
latter still has their rich donor base and a grip on the levers
of party power, but they also have a track record of failure --
most embarrassingly to Trump in 2016. It is unlikely that this
divide will heal soon, but they do have dangerous enemies in
common -- which should help focus the mind.
- I am getting to where I have very little patience for the
still-prevalent internecine sniping between these camps. But
that doesn't mean we shouldn't argue about important matters
of policy, like the tendency of the Clinton and Obama admins
to undermine unions, to promote job-killing trade deals, to
allow financiers to take over our industries and run them to
ground, to increase mass incarceration, to allow the national
security state to withdraw ever further from the purview of
the people they're supposed to serve -- and one should add
the global war on anything that affronts American egos, which
is an issue that even Bernie Sanders has treated as a sort of
- Whereas Republicans can at least make short-term gains merely
by cranking up the volume of their social polarization, Democrats
have to respond rationally and systematically. First thing they
(especially the elites) need to do is to shift their program to
emphasize a tangible return to the people they expect and hope
will vote for them -- even if that means becoming less responsive
to their donors. Second, they need to make the donors realize that
the viability of the party depends on the party delivering benefits
to its base -- and in fact that the country as a whole would gain
by forging a more equitable economy and society. And third, those
who wish to appeal to the more white workers need to convince them
that they cannot prosper without helping everyone -- that Republican
demagoguery offers them nothing but ruin, and that only the Democrats
are offering them a hand up.
Josh Marshall: The Real Problem With Equifax:
It now seems clear that the massive data breach at Equifax was caused
not simply by aggressive hackers but by clear and potentially negligent
security errors by Equifax itself. But fundamentally, this isn't a
security problem. It's a market failure and a legal and regulatory
failure. . . .
In some cases consumers would rebel. That would solve the problem.
But that's actually a key part of the problem: consumers aren't
Equifax's customers. They're the product. You're the product.
Banks and other lenders like credit agencies because they offer a
systematized and standardized way of evaluating risk. The banks are
the customers. Credit rating agencies would prefer never to deal
with consumers at all. They only do so when forced to or, more
recently, as they've developed a secondary business in selling
consumers services to help them protect themselves against errors
or security breaches by credit rating agencies.
Bill McKibben: Stop talking right now about the threat of climate
change. It's here; it's happening: Massive hurricanes, record
high temperatures and wildfires on the west coast, drought in North
Dakota -- and that's just seven days in the US. Other related links:
Matthew Yglesias: The 4 most important stories in politics this week:
Senate Republicans threw an Obamacare repeal Hail Mary: Senators
Cassidy and Graham proposed repealing ACA and replacing it with that
old standby: block grants to the states; DREAMer deal: Trump's
over-dinner deal with Shumer/Pelosi; Berniecare: kiss-of-death
label for Sanders' "Medicare for All" bill; Tax reform is coming
soon, maybe. Other Yglesias pieces this week (skipping the ones
on Apple's product announcements, which would only be of interest
if they explained the predatory nature of Apple hype, which they
Berniecare leaves enormous discretion to the executive branch;
Trump should actually do what he's pretending he'll do on tax reform;
The Trump administration's big new anti-leak memo leaked last night;
Medicare-for-all is nothing like "repeal and replace";
Donald Trump is making the single-payer push inevitable. I'm
not happy Yglesias keeps referring to "Berniecare," but he does
offer a pretty fair description of the Republican alternatives:
Repeal and replace wasn't just a slogan that covered up some internal
disagreements. It was a lie. Repeal and replace was an effort to bridge
a fundamentally unbridgeable gap between the American people's complaints
about the ACA -- premiums, deductibles, and copayments that were too
high -- and the Republican Party donor class's complaints about the ACA:
that it levied too much in taxes. This left Republican legislators not
just with some difficult trade-offs to grapple with, but with the
difficult question of how to break the news to the American people that
the outcome of their legislation was going to bear no resemblance
whatsoever to what had been promised.
Monday, September 11. 2017
Music: Current count 28650  rated (+23), 376  unrated (+7).
Light count, mostly because I missed three days from the middle
of the week -- would have been much lower had I not hit Rhapsody
hard on the weekend. On Wednesday, I took a long day trip to see
my extraordinary cousins in Independence, KS. Left around noon,
and got back after midnight. Actually, night before I made a
cake for the occasion (much to the disappointment of those
hoping for a my mother's legendary
but I had so little time I went with simple and surefire).
Friday I cooked a Turkish dinner for seven (if you're interested,
I did a brain dump in the
I had a doctor's appointment, then went shopping, and finally
started cooking. Worn out after that, and aggravated by a
couple stupid kitchen mishaps (plus a couple pieces of
technology that completely discredit my reputation as a smart
Many of the records below came from
Phil Overeem's latest 2017-to-date list: only things I haven't
heard there now are the two AUM Fidelity jazz releases (William Parker
and David S. Ware), Obnox: Niggative Approach (only 4/12 cuts
on Bandcamp), and the Nots' single (or so I assume). Public Enemy was
available as a free download for a week or so, but that's dried up and
the only copy I found was on YouTube. Could be that more plays might
raise it a notch -- ditto for Shabazz Palaces -- but I'd say odds are
equal that they wouldn't. The worst, no surprise, were Dylan's songbook
albums: the 2016 one was on Overeem's 2016 list but I hadn't noticed
it on Napster until now.
My grade breakdown from Overeem's list: 20 A-, 14 ***, 17 **, 11 *,
3 B, 1 C+, 4 unheard. This week's only A- record comes from his list,
a case where Ghana and Mozambique meet somewhere in Europe. I don't
have a breakdown for how many I actually have CDs for -- probably not
many (ok, 5, all but one jazz).
Haven't done anything on the jazz guides in 2-3 weeks, so my hopes
of wrapping them up -- first draft, just raw collection -- by the end
of the month are pretty slim. I've been stuck 29% of the way through
Post-2000 Jazz, which
leaves me with 1638 more artists in the file (plus 173 deferred
groups), plus some relatively minor (but hard to estimate) mop up.
No idea how long that will take, but the obvious answer is forever
if I don't get started again.
I thought I had posted the first two links below, where various
former writers and other workers at the Village Voice write about
the past on the occasion of the Voice terminating its print edition,
but they were still stuck in my scratch file. The others continue
I was reminded of the anniversary of 9/11/2001 today by a small
article in the Eagle and a couple of items on the comics page. Theme
was "never forget." So why the fuck is that? What exactly have sixteen
years of obsessing over the outrage, picking at the scab, and flailing
at our supposed enemies gotten us? We would have been better off to
have treated it like a bad hurricane: grieved, consoled, rebuilt,
moved on. And it's not as if Americans never forget. They had already
forgotten why the people who hijacked and crashed those planes did so,
leaving them with no better understanding of what happened than "hate
our freedoms" and "axis of evil." Indeed, most Americans have forgotten
lots of big things, like slavery and genocide against Indians, so why
not this? The only real reason is that some people have agendas that
exploit memory. Bush and company saw 9/11 as their ticket to launch a
vast and endless war to reassert neocon supremacy. Most Democrats had
compatible agendas, based largely on their supposed superiority at
winning wars (e.g., Peter Beinart's book, The Good Fight: Why
Liberals -- and Only Liberals -- Can Win the War on Terror).
This fetish of victimhood on 9/11 mocks our annual remembrance of
the 1941 Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor: both supposedly signify
how an innocent and peace-loving people got dragged into war by a
dastardly attack on a "day of infamy," but Americans in 2001 could
hardly be described as innocent or peace-loving -- certainly not
by anyone aware of the US Defense budget. The other WWII event
we still celebrate isn't the end of the war: it's D-Day, when US
troops landed in France -- not nearly the turning point of the war
that the Soviet victory at Stalingrad was, but the best we can lay
claim to. The agenda of Pearl Harbor + D-Day is to make us feel
good about war, and pass those Defense budgets. (Peace people also
remember Hiroshima, and again there is an agenda: to remind us
that nuclear holocaust is still a real possibility.)
For once, I'm not alone in voicing these views. See:
Paul Krugman: The Day Nothing Changed.
New records rated this week:
- Django Bates: Saluting Sgt. Pepper (2016 , Edition): [r]: B
- João Barradas: Directions (2017, Inner Circle Music): [r]: B+(**)
- Black Lips: Satan's Graffiti or God's Art (2017, Vice): [r]: B+(*)
- Action Bronson: Blue Chips 7000 (2017, Vice/Atlantic): [r]: B+(**)
- Don Bryant: Don't Give Up on Love (2017, Fat Possum): [r]: B+(*)
- Brian Charette Circuit Bent Organ Trio: Kürrent (2017, Dim Mak): [r]: B+(*)
- Damaged Bug: Bunker Funk (2017, Castle Face): [r]: B
- Dave Douglas With the Westerlies and Anwar Marshall: Little Giant Still Life (2016 , Greenleaf Music): [cd]: B+(**)
- Mike Downes: Root Structure (2016 , Addo): [cd]: B+(*)
- Bob Dylan: Fallen Angels (2016, Columbia): [r]: C+
- Bob Dylan: Triplicate (2017, Columbia, 3CD): [r]: C+
- Erica Falls: Home Grown (2017, self-released): [r]: B+(**)
- Gato Preto: Tempo (2017, Unique): [r]: A-
- Garland Jeffreys: 14 Steps to Harlem (2017, Luna Park): [r]: B+(*)
- LCD Soundsystem: American Dream (2017, DFA/Columbia): [r]: B+(**)
- David Lopato: Gendhing for a Spirit Rising (2017, Global Coolant, 2CD): [cd]: B+(*)
- Public Enemy: Nothing Is Quick in the Desert (2017, Enemy): [yt]: B+(***)
- Shabazz Palaces: Quazarz: Born on a Gangster Star (2017, Sub Pop): [bc]: B+(***)
- Shabazz Palaces: Quazarz vs. the Jealous Machines (2017, Sub Pop): [bc]: B+(**)
Recent reissues, compilations, and vault discoveries rated this week:
- James Luther Dickinson: I'm Just Dead I'm Not Gone (Lazarus Edition) (2006 , Memphis International): [r]: B+(***)
- Joe King Kologbo & the High Grace: Sugar Daddy (1980 , Strut): [r]: B+(***)
- Shina Williams & His African Percussionists: Agboju Logun (1984 , Strut, EP): [r]: B+(*)
- Neil Young: Hitchhiker (1976 , Reprise): [r]: B+(***)
- Zaïre 74: The African Artists (1974 , Wrasse, 2CD): [r]: B+(**)
Old music rated this week:
- Bulbul: Hirn Fein Hacken (2014, Exile on Mainstream): [r]: B+(**)
- David S. Ware: Live in the Netherlands (1997 , Splasc(H)): [r]: B+(**)
Unpacking: Found in the mail last week:
- Richard X Bennett: Experiments With Truth (Ropeadope)
- Richard X Bennett: What Is Now (Ropeadope)
- Florian Hoefner: Coldwater Stories (Origin): September 15
- Emi Meyer: Monochrome (Origin): September 15
- Debbie Poryes Trio: Loving Hank (OA2): September 15
- Nestor Torres: Jazz Flute Traditions (Alfi): September 15
- Ken Wiley: Jazz Horn Redux (Krug Park Music)