<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/blog/templates/default/atom.css" type="text/css" ?>
<feed version="0.3"
   xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#"
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3" rel="service.feed" title="Tom Hull - On the Web" type="application/x.atom+xml" />
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/"                        rel="alternate"    title="Tom Hull - On the Web" type="text/html" />
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=2.0"     rel="alternate"    title="Tom Hull - On the Web" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Tom Hull - On the Web</title>
    <tagline mode="escaped" type="text/html">My little place on the web...</tagline>
    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/</id>
    <modified>2013-05-22T07:21:21Z</modified>
    <generator url="http://www.s9y.org/" version="0.7.1">Serendipity 0.7.1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:thull2@cox.net" />
    <info mode="xml" type="text/html">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">You are viewing an ATOM formatted XML site feed. Usually this file is inteded to be viewed in an aggregator or syndication software. If you want to know more about ATOM, please visist <a href="http://atomenabled.org/">Atomenabled.org</a></div>
    </info>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1980-Woke-Up-Screaming.html" rel="alternate" title="Woke Up Screaming" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-05-22T06:55:00Z</issued>
    <created>2013-05-22T06:55:00Z</created>
    <modified>2013-05-22T07:21:21Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1980</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1980</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1980-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Woke Up Screaming</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Woke up screaming, around noon today: leg cramp, high up my thigh.
My wife ordered me to stand on it. Good advice, but I couldn't find
my way out from under the covers until she pulled them off. Finally
swung my legs over the side, tilted out of bed and steadied myself
leaning against a dresser or something. My mouth was parched, so I
asked for some water. A couple sips dissolved the residue that had
gummed my jaws together. I stumbled to the bathroom. The sharp pain
subsided, leaving a sore knot. Put on some socks and pants, and
ventured downstairs. Good thing we put that new stair rail in.</p>

<p>Not a typical day, but most days have something unpleasant sooner
or later. The dry mouth is an everyday occurrence. Back in the winter
I tried going without antihistamines, but my sinuses only got worse.
Now that the skies are thick with pollen (plus whatever else the recent
onslaught of storms dredged up) I'm doubling up on the over-the-counter
meds. For many years I took a prescription super-dose of Allegra, but
the insurance company dropped that from their formulary so we tried
the loratidine and I eventually started supplementing it with benadryl.
Nothing works. I haven't had a completely clear breath through my nose
since 1986, on a vacation to Cape Cod.</p>

<p>Among the unpleasant tasks scheduled for today is another formulary
problem: Blue Cross/Blue Shield [MA] and/or Express Scripts have decided
that the two anti-cholesterol meds I take now require physician override
paperwork, so my prescription renewal has been held up. (And because
Express Scripts canceled my "auto renewal" on those prescriptions
unawares to me, I'm real close to running out of both.) What they want,
aside from my death, is to force all their "customers" to switch to
generic atorvastatin (Lipitor), and when you look at the price tags of
Crestor and Zetia you can see why. Those drugs are "protected" by patents
which allow their "owners" to charge whatever the market will bear, and
the pharmaceutical companies do just that, ruthlessly. Changing their
formulary rules is one way that bulk buyers like Express Scripts can
fight back against getting gouged, but in doing so they inflict real
costs as well as hassles onto physicians and patients. In my case, to
get the same results I'm currently getting will require recalibrating
my statin dosage upwards -- several visits and tests -- and expose me
to further side effects, not that any of those things matter to the
insurer.</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p>If I could wave a magic wand and fix one thing, it would be to get
rid of patents. There are lots of bad things about patents, like how
they increase the cost of innovation (obviously by involving lawyers),
and how they disincentivize others from improving patented inventions,
but the worst aspect is the "reward" of monopoly rights. Free markets
work precisely because they are free of monopoly. One could come up
with some regulatory scheme to limit patent rents: for drugs, you could
assign royalties for generic duplicators, which would allow for some
measure of competition around a higher cost point while still rewarding
the patent holder's development efforts. But that would mostly make
the patent process more political, and perhaps even more litigious.
Better to get rid of patents altogether, then put public funds into
"open source" research and development, which manufacturing companies
could then build products on -- less potential gain, but also less
cost and liability.</p>

<p>Patents work in various ways in other industries, but the effects
are much the same: they subvert capitalism by promoting monopolies;
they push research into dark secrecy, often hiding flaws until it's
too late; they reduce incentives for others to offer improvements;
they add legal costs, both to file patents and to defend against
them; they can be assigned or sold to parasitical trolls; they lead
to an increasingly inequal world where a few "owners" extort rents
from everyone else. What they don't do is stimulate innovation, or
even do a very good job of rewarding it. Many innovations occur to
multiple people independently, and many more would if research
spaces weren't so compartmentalized by corporate interests. And
most patents fail to pass the basic test of unobviousness. In drugs,
for instance, all it takes to get a patent is a new molecule --
something that chemists create all the time. Take away the patents,
the monopoly pricing, the ridiculous marketing budgets, and all
of that and you'd wind up with a world where Express Scripts had
no reason to make doctors jump through hoops to get away with
prescribing the drugs they regard as most fit for their patients.
And that would be one less hassle for me on a day that has way
too many of them.</p>

<p>Much of my politics, by the way, is driven by a desire to reduce
the amount of unnecessary hassle I -- and by extension other people,
since I figure that we're all pretty much alike -- have to deal with.
One facet of this is that I don't get all worked up over "personal
responsibility" -- the great bugaboo of the right. They think that
people prove their personal worth by overcoming adversity, so they
back policies that create a lot of it (like our current health care
system, or our "education" and "justice" systems), although most of
them wind up being races rigged by the rich for the rich.</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p>Much of the day I try to process some music, and today hasn't been
very productive. I woke up not only in pain but bleary-eyed, something
that happens a lot. Today I have a lot of trouble copying down info
from the microscopic print on CDs -- looks like my eyes will end my
music review career before my ears do (although my grandfather and
father lost most of their hearing by close to my age). Also had trouble
concentrating: took me four plays of Christian McBride to get a little
squib written down, even though the album was pretty obvious. Will
Calhoun got two plays. Played Black Host twice and held it back for
tomorrow. Listening to Daft Punk on Rhapsody as I write this.</p>

<p>One thing that slowed me down was interruptions. The HVAC guy came
over for a Spring system check, so I watched what he did, thinking I
could do all but the pressure test myself, and picking his mind on how
to install a new condensate pump -- a project I keep procrastinating
on although I've had all the parts for about a year now. Didn't start
that but did knock off one little project that's been sitting around
for a couple weeks. I have a little space in the downstairs half-bath
between the vanity and the back wall; hard to get to, but wide enough
I thought I could slip in one of those roll-out baskets they make for
under-sink cabinets. I bought the unit and built and painted a bracket
to hold it a couple weeks ago, but the space is so hard to reach it
would be hell to secure -- and indeed it was, as every possible approach
involved painful contortions. I couldn't get one wall anchor in, or get
close enough to see why. (Probably hit a stud, which otherwise would
have been good news.) And I left the wall side sitting loose on a pair
of corner braces -- I would normally have screwed them tight but couldn't
negotiate the angle. Still, pretty sure it's solid enough, so I felt
like I got something done today.</p>

<p>And wrote this little "day in the life" screed -- more therapy for
me than info for you. Some of this may just be inevitable wear and tear,
but much of the hassle seems unnecessary. And the more I struggle with
nuissances, the less good I get done.</p>
        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1979-Music-WeekJazz-Prospecting.html" rel="alternate" title="Music Week/Jazz Prospecting" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-05-20T19:54:21Z</issued>
    <created>2013-05-20T19:54:21Z</created>
    <modified>2013-05-20T19:54:21Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1979</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1979</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1979-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Music Week/Jazz Prospecting</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Music: Current count 21440 [21406] rated (+34), 629 [622] unrated (+7).</p>

<p>Lost some ground last week, after a good start which picked up some
stragglers, finding some honorable mentions but nothing to add to the
A-list. Rated count is up because I've adding things to the Rhapsody
Streamnotes file -- including a fair amount of jazz I didn't receive.
(Including three new AUM Fidelity releases that finally make me feel
not so bad about being jilted and dumped from their mailing list.) No
Clean Feed package yet -- probably time to complain. Did get a package
from Lithuania with tantalizing obscurities, including a 1974 item
with a very young William Parker on bass (<i>Melodic Art-Tet</i>).</p>

<p>Streamnotes will run after A Downloader's Diary, whenever that's
ready, certainly by the end of the month. Trying to keep up with the
incoming jazz, but not worried about it. More bothered by everything
else that's slipping, including a way overdue update to the Christgau
website, and lots of seemingly imaginary projects of my own. I did
manage to finish my "stone moat" around the back of the house --
just in time for it to get roughed up by yesterday's tornado. We
didn't suffer any building damage, so whatever it was wasn't a real
ground-touching tornado but it stripped a lot of leaves and twigs
and deposited them in swirling patterns on our roof -- something
I've never seen before.</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<table align="right">
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/fujii-spring.jpg"></td></tr>
</table>

<p><b>Perry Beekman: <i>So in Love: Perry Beekman Sings and Plays
Cole Porter</i></b> (2013, self-released): Guitarist-vocalist, based
in Woodstock, NY; first album as far as I can tell, although he's
"been playing in jazz clubs, and at private and corporate events
throughout New York City for the past 25 years." Fifteen Cole Porter
songs, backed by piano and bass. Hard to go wrong.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Marc Bernstein &amp; Good People: <i>Hymn for Life</i></b>
(2012 [2013], Origin): Saxophonist, from New York but based in
Denmark, lead instrument here is bass clarinet. Fourth album since
1999, quartet with Jacob Anderskov (piano), Jonas Westergaard (bass),
and Rakalam Bob Moses (drums), plus featured singer Sinne Eeg. She
has a remarkable voice, dark and smoky.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Blue Cranes: <i>Swim</i></b> (2013, Cuneiform): Group, quintet 
with two saxes (Reed Walsmith and Joe Cunningham), keyboards (Rebecca
Sanborn), bass (Keith Brush) and drums (Ji Tanzer); based in Portland,
OR; handful of albums since 2007, including a remix of the last one
(not counting an intervening EP). Long guest list this time, including
strings on 5 (of 9) cuts. Big slabs of sound, nothing but volume to
make you think they need more than one horn.
<b>B</b> [advance]</p>

<p><b>Freddy Cole: <i>This and That</i></b> (2012 [2013], High Note):
Nat's little brother, 14 years junior which makes him 81 now, finally
found his mature voice a few years back and has been on a steady roll.
Backed by pianist John Di Martino, with tasty guitar by arranger Randy
Napoleon, and select sax and trombone spots. Scrounging a bit for songs
he hasn't done before, but he even makes something of "Everybody's
Talkin'."
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>The Jay D'Amico Quintet: <i>Tango Caliente</i></b> (2012 [2013],
Consolidated Artists Productions): Pianist, sixth album since 1983,
the last three subtitled "Jazz Under Glass." First tango themed album,
although he's done classical- and opera-themes. Expanded his trio to
include Andrew Sterman on tenor sax and flute, and Richie Vitale on
trumpet and flugelhorn -- nothing that will be mistaken as authentic.
Nothing caliente here; don't know the Spanish for "lukewarm," but
it's not even that.
<b>C+</b></p>

<p><b>Marko Djordjevic &amp; Sveti: <i>Something Beautiful 1709-2110</i></b>
(2013, Goalkeeper): Drummer, from Serbia, studied at Berklee. Recorded
first album as Sveti in 1995. Group now is a piano trio (Bobby Avey and
Desmond White) with tenor sax added on half the tracks (Eli Degibri and
Tivon Pennicott, three cuts each). All originals.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Satoko Fujii Ma-Do: <i>Time Stands Still</i></b> (2011 [2013],
Not Two): One of pianist Fujii's many groups, with Natsuki Tamura on
trumpet, Norikatsu Koreyasu on bass, and Akira Horikoshi on drums:
their third and final album together -- Koreyasu died of a heart
attack shortly after. Some typically fine moments from Fujii and
(especially) Tamura, but overall a bit subdued, almost poignant in
the end.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Satoko Fujii New Trio: <i>Spring Storm</i></b> (2013, Libra):
Japanese pianist, has a lot of albums but not many conventional piano
trios. This one has Todd Nicholson on bass and Takashi Itani on drums.
Some fine examples of her impressive block chording and much more in
a more melodic vein.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Laszlo Gardony: <i>Clarity</i></b> (2012 [2013], Sunnyside):
Pianist, b. 1956 in Hungary, came to US in 1983 to study at Berklee.
Tenth album since 1986, a solo, all original material, inching up
to a strong rhythmic vamp at the end.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>I Compani: <i>Extended</i></b> (2013, Icdisc): Dutch group,
founded by saxophonist Bo van de Graaf around 1985, ten or so
albums since then, their favorite subject the film music of Nino
Rota, although another is Sun Ra, who provides the only non-Rota
cover here, plus a song title. As the title suggests, the band
has been beefed up here, to as many as 24 members, which can
mean massive or mayhem but is usually slyly amusing. Weak spot
is the vocals, a mix of art song and opera that easily rubs me
the wrong way.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Richard Lanham: <i>Thou Swell</i></b> (1998 [2013], RL Productions):
Singer, started out with his brothers in a doo-wop group called the Tempo
Tones -- YouTube has a video dated 1957, and Discogs lists one song on an
obscure, undated compilation -- and went on to sing with King Curtis, did
something with Wynton Kelly, joined another group called the Boateneers --
can't find any evidence of them -- and so forth, eventually recording this
debut album, which in turn was shelved for fifteen years. Tenor saxophonist
Jerry Weldon arranged, the songs notably checking Ray Charles and Nat Cole,
with some gospel and calypso worked in, all of which are to his taste.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Ivan Lins: <i>Cornucopia</i></b> (2012 [2013], Sunnyside):
Brazilian singer-songwriter, b. 1945, scored his first hit in 1970
and has been a major figure ever since, with over 35 albums. This
one is a major production, backed by the SWR Big Band, singer Paula
Morelenbaum, Themba Mkhize's South African Choir, bassist Nilson
Matta, and lots of extra percussionists.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Miki Purnell: <i>Swingin' to the Sea</i></b> (2013, Sweet and
Lovely Music): Standards singer, one original on this her debut album.
From San Diego, where she maintains a day job as a family practice
physician. Likes vocalese (titles like "Bluesette" and "A Night in
Tunisia"), doesn't scat much, has a slightly girlish voice that grows
on you. Guests Tamir Hendelman (piano) and Lori Bell (flute) produce.
Nice, delicate reading of "The Nearness of You," and her "Swinging
on a Star" is utterly delightful.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Sherri Roberts: Lovely Days</i></b> (2011-12 [2013], Blue
House/Pacific Coast Jazz): Standards singer, fourth album, backed by
pianist Bliss Rodriguez and nothing more -- she handles it well, but
it doesn't feel like much, especially when the pace turns glacial on
"Moon River."
<b>B</b></p>

<p><b>Wallace Roney: <i>Understanding</i></b> (2013, High Note):
Trumpeter, has at least 16 albums since 1987, basically a mainstream
hard bop guy although he's been dabbling with electronics the last
few albums. No such electronics here: back to basics, and crank it
up a bit. He'a also replaced his brother, saxophonist Antoine Roney,
with Arnold Lee on alto and Ben Solomon on tenor. Mostly covers
from the hard bop years, including two each from McCoy Tyner and
Duke Pearson. One original each by Roney and Solomon. Nothing new
here, but it does smoke.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Anna Webber: <i>Percussive Mechanics</i></b> (2012 [2013], Pirouet):
Plays flute and tenor sax, originally from British Columbia, studied at
McGill and moved to New York. Second (or third) album, recorded in Germany,
with  clarinet/alto sax, piano, vibes/marimba, bass, two drummers -- no
names I recognize -- the emphasis on jangly, off-center percussion. All
original compositions.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p><b>Unpacking:</b> Found in the mail last week:</p>

<ul>
<li><b>Susanne Abbuehl: <i>The Gift</i></b> (ECM): advance, June 11</li>
<li><b>Laura Ainsworth: <i>Necessary Evil</i></b> (Eclectus): June 25</li>
<li><b>David Ake: <i>Bridges</i></b> (Posi-Tone)</li>
<li><b>Kenny Barron: <i>Kenny Barron &amp; the Brazilian Knights</i></b> (Sunnyside)</li>
<li><b>Ketil Bjørnstad: <i>La Notte</i></b> (ECM): advance, June 11</li>
<li><b>Michel Camilo: <i>What's Up?</i></b> (Okeh)</li>
<li><b>The Convergence Quartet: <i>Slow and Steady</i></b> (No Business)</li>
<li><b>Correction With Mats Gustafsson: <i>Shift</i></b> (No Business): advance</li>
<li><b>Roger Davidson: <i>Journey to Rio</i></b> (Soundbrush, 2CD)</li>
<li><b>Gene Ess: <i>Fractal Attraction</i></b> (SIMP)</li>
<li><b>Joel Harrison 19: <i>Infinite Possibility</i></b> (Sunnyside)</li>
<li><b>Julia Hülsmann Quartet: <i>In Full View</i></b> (ECM): advance, June 11</li>
<li><b>Yoron Israel &amp; High Standards: <i>Visions: The Music of Stevie Wonder</i></b> (Ronja Music)</li>
<li><b>Bob James &amp; David Sanborn: <i>Quartette Humaine</i></b> (Okeh)</li>
<li><b>Keith Jarrett/Gary Peacock/Jack DeJohnette: <i>Somewhere</i></b> (ECM)</li>
<li><b>Eugenie Jones: <i>Black Lace Blue Tears</i></b> (self-released)</li>
<li><b>Annie Kozuch: <i>Mostly Jobim</i></b> (self-released): June 25</li>
<li><b>Brian Landrus Kaleidoscope: <i>Mirage</i></b> (Blueland)</li>
<li><b>Aaron Lebos: <i>Reality</i></b> (self-released)</li>
<li><b>Steven Lugerner: <i>For We Have Heard</i></b> (NoBusiness/Primary): advance</li>
<li><b><i>Melodic Art-Tet</i></b> (1974, No Business)</li>
<li><b>Evan Parker/Barry Guy/Paul Lytton: <i>Live at Maya Recordings Festival</i></b> (No Business)</li>
<li><b>Gary Peacock/Marilyn Crispell: <i>Azure</i></b> (ECM): advance, June 11</li>
<li><b>Carline Ray: <i>Vocal Sides</i></b> (Carlcat)</li>
<li><b>Cécile McLorin Salvant: <i>WomanChild</i></b> (Mack Avenue)</li>
<li><b>Vandeweyer/Van Hove/Lovens/Blume: <i>Quat: Live at Hasselt</i></b> (No Business)</li>
</ul>
        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1978-Weekend-Roundup.html" rel="alternate" title="Weekend Roundup" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-05-20T06:56:00Z</issued>
    <created>2013-05-20T06:56:00Z</created>
    <modified>2013-05-20T07:30:13Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1978</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1978</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1978-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Weekend Roundup</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>After a lazy week, some more links to ponder:</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<ul>

<li><p><a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/obama-calls-irs-targeting-scandal-outrageous">
Igor Bobic: Obama Promises to Hold IRS Accountable on 'Outrageous'
Targeting</a>: Given the history of the federal government harrassing
left-wing political organizations, "outrageous" isn't the first word
that pops into my mind regarding the revelations that some IRS personnel
singled out "tea party" group applications for review of 501(C) status.
My reaction was more like a giggle, but then I found out that none of
the "targeted" organizations were actually denied. I'm not expert in
the relevant law, but I do know that a
<a href="http://wichitapeace.org">peace organization</a> I'm close to
has both a 501(C) fund that is strictly non-political ("educational")
and another funding stream that isn't tax exempt but can be used for
more political activities (although in practice it isn't used for
anything partisan or electoral). So it doesn't exactly surprise me
that "tea party" groups would skirt that law: they are primarily
political propaganda outlets, funded by rich right-wingers who can
use the tax-exempt feature to stretch their self-interested bucks.
Unlike most of the people who donate to our little peace group. (We
haven't itemized deductions in many years, so our donations don't
save us a dime on our taxes.) Obama is right that the IRS should be
non-partisan, but his reaction shouldn't be an outrage that feeds
into enemy talking points. (For instance, I see
<a href="http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entry/glenn-beck-benghazi-boston-bombings-irs-scandal-are">
Glenn Beck</a> now claiming that the "IRS scandal" is "all connected"
with the Benghazi attack and the Boston bombings. On the Republicans'
ability to keep these pseudo-scandals in the news cycle, crowding out
real issues, see
<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/sunday_shows_round_up_all_about_the_irs_and_benghazi/">
Julian Rayfield: Sunday Shows Round-Up: All About the IRS and
Benghazi</a>. As for real but ignored issues, see
<a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/05/the-biggest-obama-scandals-are-proven-and-ignored/275960/">
Conor Friedersdorff: The Biggest Obama Scandals Are Proven and Ignored</a> --
a list Republicans don't care about or even applaud.)</p>
<p>See
<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/18/a_look_at_why_the_benghazi_issue_keeps_coming_back/">
Connie Cass: A Look at Why the Bengazi Issue Keeps Coming Back</a> for
a useful review of what happened there and who said what when. Of the
various facts, the one that jumps out at me was that the "US consulate"
in Benghazi was actually a CIA station, and aside from Ambassador
Stevens the people involved were CIA agents and contractors, so the
instinct to lie and cover up is deeply ingrained. The other key point
is that the real political issue here was Obama's decision to intervene
in Libya's civil war and help ouster Moammar Gaddafi. Obama promised
not to put US military forces on the ground in Libya, but it seems
inevitable that the CIA were active, routing guns and information to
anti-Gaddafi forces -- some of which were bound to be anti-American
Islamists (proving again how little the CIA learned from Afghanistan,
where US clients included future leaders of the Taliban and indeed
Osama Bin Laden himself).</p>
<p>Of course, intervention in Libya isn't on the Republican's own
"talking points": they'd rather attack the administration for trying
to substitute "extremists" for "terrorists," mostly in the belief
that their language is a more potent stimulus to further US-backed
wars in the region. Even there, what they loathe Obama for isn't
that he hasn't been belligerent enough for their taste -- excepting
McCain and Graham, of course, who never met a war they didn't want
to plunge into -- but that Obama isn't jingoistic enough.</p></li>

<li><p><a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2013/jun/06/how-case-austerity-has-crumbled/?pagination=false">
Paul Krugman: How the Case for Austerity Has Crumbled</a>: Book
review of: Neil Irwin: <i>The Alchemists: Three Central Bankers
and a World on Fire</i> (Penguin); Mark Blyth: <i>Austerity: The
History of a Dangerous Idea</i> (Oxford University Press); and
David A. Stockman: <i>The Great Deformation: The Corruption of
Capitalism in America</i> (Public Affairs). But starts off with
the Reinhart-Rogoff fiasco -- the paper that claimed that when
a nation's debt/GDP ratio crosses the 90% mark the economy sinks
into catastrophe, but turned out to be wrong in so many ways:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The real mystery, however, was why Reinhart-Rogoff was ever taken
seriously, let alone canonized, in the first place. Right from the
beginning, critics raised strong concerns about the paper's methodology
and conclusions, concerns that should have been enough to give everyone
pause. Moreover, Reinhart-Rogoff was actually the second example of a
paper seized on as decisive evidence in favor of austerity economics,
only to fall apart on careful scrutiny. Much the same thing happened,
albeit less spectacularly, after austerians became infatuated with a
paper by Alberto Alesina and Silvia Ardagna purporting to show that
slashing government spending would have little adverse impact on
economic growth and might even be expansionary. Surely that experience
should have inspired some caution.</p>
<p>So why wasn't there more caution? The answer, as documented by some
of the books reviewed here and unintentionally illustrated by others,
lies in both politics and psychology: the case for austerity was and
is one that many powerful people want to believe, leading them to seize
on anything that looks like a justification.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Here's a very good explanation of how recessions (depressions)
happen, especially following a prolonged expansion of debt:</p>
<blockquote><p>
All that was needed to collapse these houses of cards was some kind
of adverse shock, and in the end the implosion of US subprime-based
securities did the deed. By the fall of 2008 the housing bubbles on
both sides of the Atlantic had burst, and the whole North Atlantic
economy was caught up in "deleveraging," a process in which many
debtors try -- or are forced -- to pay down their debts at the same
time.</p>
<p>Why is this a problem? Because of interdependence: your spending
is my income, and my spending is your income. If both of us try to
reduce our debt by slashing spending, both of our incomes plunge --
and plunging incomes can actually make our indebtedness worse even
as they also produce mass unemployment.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Krugman could have extended these paragraphs into a tutorial on
how [Keynesian] macroeconomics has learned how to ameliorate and
reverse recessions, but he wound up illustrating the principles
negatively, by showing how actual central bankers ignored standard
prescriptions and made their economies worse. The key insight is
that if my income is someone else's spending, and others in the
private sector aren't spending, that deficit can be made up by
having government spend more. In other words, all it takes to
avoid disaster is the political will to deliberately do something
constructive about it. That will power was undone by a coalition of
bankers and conservative politicians, partly because they fixated
on threats (to them, anyway) that were mostly imaginary, and mostly
because they didn't give a damn about the hardships their welfare
forced on everyone else.</p>
<p>Krugman notes how many advocates of austerity see it as a morality
play -- as Andrew Mellon put it "to purge the rottenness" from the
system (nor is this view limited to curmudgeonly bankers; see
<a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/17/kinsley_loves_austerity_because_it_is_spinach/">
Alex Pareene: Kinsley Loves Austerity Because It Is "Spinach"</a>) --
and he finds examples in Stockman's book (a tirade against one "spree"
after another). Krugman then adds:</p>
<blockquote><p>
So is the austerian impulse all a matter of psychology? No, there's
also a fair bit of self-interest involved. As many observers have noted,
the turn away from fiscal and monetary stimulus can be interpreted, if
you like, as giving creditors priority over workers. Inflation and low
interest rates are bad for creditors even if they promote job creation;
slashing government deficits in the face of mass unemployment may deepen
a depression, but it increases the certainty of bondholders that they'll
be repaid in full. I don't think someone like Trichet was consciously,
cynically serving class interests at the expense of overall welfare; but
it certainly didn't hurt that his sense of economic morality dovetailed
so perfectly with the priorities of creditors.</p>
<p>It's also worth noting that while economic policy since the financial
crisis looks like a dismal failure by most measures, it hasn't been so
bad for the wealthy. Profits have recovered strongly even as unprecedented
long-term unemployment persists; stock indices on both sides of the Atlantic
have rebounded to pre-crisis highs even as median income languishes. It
might be too much to say that those in the top 1 percent actually benefit
from a continuing depression, but they certainly aren't feeling much pain,
and that probably has something to do with policymakers' willingness to
stay the austerity course. [&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;]</p>
<p>I'd argue that what happened next -- the way policymakers turned their
back on practically everything economists had learned about how to deal
with depressions, the way elite opinion seized on anything that could be
used to justify austerity -- was a much greater sin. The financial crisis
of 2008 was a surprise, and happened very fast; but we've been stuck in
a regime of slow growth and desperately high unemployment for years now.
And during all that time policymakers have been ignoring the lessons of
theory and history.</p>
<p>It's a terrible story, mainly because of the immense suffering that
has resulted from these policy errors. It's also deeply worrying for
those who like to believe that knowledge can make a positive difference
in the world. To the extent that policymakers and elite opinion in general
have made use of economic analysis at all, they have, as the saying goes,
done so the way a drunkard uses a lamppost: for support, not illumination.
Papers and economists who told the elite what it wanted to hear were
celebrated, despite plenty of evidence that they were wrong; critics
were ignored, no matter how often they got it right.
</p></blockquote>
<p>It would take a much longer piece, but at some point it would be
worth breaking out the things that constitute "immense suffering":
the unfairness of so much unemployment; discrimination against all
sorts of marginalized workers, especially the old (who policymakers
expect to work longer and longer) and the young (who face extra
difficulties in starting careers, and in many cases start with
unprecedented debt burdens); and much more. Nor is public spending
only needed to counterbalance the drop in private spending -- the
need for infrastructure and public goods has never been greater,
and the austerity fixation is crippling us (physically, mentally,
aspirationally).</p></li>

</ul>
        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1977-Music-WeekJazz-Prospecting.html" rel="alternate" title="Music Week/Jazz Prospecting" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-05-13T21:11:34Z</issued>
    <created>2013-05-13T21:11:34Z</created>
    <modified>2013-05-13T21:11:34Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1977</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1977</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1977-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Music Week/Jazz Prospecting</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Music: Current count 21406 [21383] rated (+23), 622 [617] unrated (+5).
Not sure what accounts for the fall off, but then don't remember much of
last week.</p>

<p>A-list records continue to accumulate at a dizzying pace, a far cry
from a couple months ago when they were scarce as hen's teeth -- clever
triangulators will note that in addition to the two featured in this
rather short week there are two more in the unpacking list that were
first uncovered on Rhapsody. Thus far I have 41 A-list records this
year, so we're still not quite on track to getting to last year's 125,
but not so far behind either.</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<table align="right">
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/amado-flame.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/finlayson-moment.jpg"></td></tr>
</table>

<p><b>Rodrigo Amado Motion Trio + Jeb Bishop: <i>The Flame Alphabet</i></b>
(2011 [2013], Not Two): Bishop is the Chicago-based trombone player
who left the Vandermark Five about five years ago, and has kept busy
since then mostly guesting on projects where he easily adds to the
noise level -- his tour with Cactus Truck is fresh on my mind -- but
here he takes the lead without the least bit of slop in a showcase
of avant-trombone that would turn the heads of Steve Swell, or for
that matter Roswell Rudd: a huge improvement over Bishop's previous
album with Portuguese tenor saxophonist Amado's trio, <i>Burning
Live at Jazz ao Centro</i>. And Amado is sharp as ever, ably backed
by Miguel Mira on cello and Gabriel Ferrandini on drums.
<b>A-</b></p>

<p><b>Jerry Bergonzi: <i>By Any Other Name</i></b> (2012 [2013], Savant):
Tenor saxophonist, from Boston, has a long list of records since 1983
but has never sounded better than in his recent streak -- I have four
of his last six albums at A-, the other two just a hair under. So I was
surprised when this didn't kick in, but I blame Phil Grenadier's trumpet,
which ties the sax up in unison work and takes solos that add up to very
little. In his own spots the saxphonist is as brusque as ever -- there
just aren't enough of them. Songs are all originals, but parenthetically
refer to standards.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Jonathan Finlayson &amp; Sicilian Defense: <i>Moment &amp; the
Message</i></b> (2012 [2013], Pi): Trumpet player, first album after
quality side credits with Steve Lehman, Steve Coleman, Tomas Fujiwara,
and -- most likely; still haven't heard the album -- Mary Halvorson.
Quintet with Miles Okazaki (guitar), David Virelles (piano), Keith
Witty (bass), and Damion Reid (drums). No second horn keeps his out
front, while the guitar and piano players are rising stars, sparkling
soloists with an intriguingly complex interplay.
<b>A-</b></p>

<p><b>Hush Point: <i>Hush Point</i></b> (2013, Sunnyside): Postbop
pianoless quartet, the two horns John McNeil's trumpet and Jeremy
Udden's alto sax, with Aryeh Kobrinsky on bass and Vinnie Sperrazza
on drums. I initially assumed this would be McNeil's show -- he's
about 30 years senior -- but Udden outwrote him 4-to-3, Kobrinsky
pitched in, and they picked up two Jimmy Giuffre tunes that seem
like a shared connection. The hornwork is tight and sly, the rhythm
slippery. Nothing spectacular, but could well grow on you.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Steven Lugerner: <i>For We Have Heard</i></b> (2013,
NoBusiness/Primary): Plays double reeds, clarinets, flutes, saxes.
Second album, after his ambitious 2-CD debut (also has a group
record, <i>Dads</i>, by Chives). Quartet with Darren Johnston on
trumpet, Myra Melford on piano, and Matt Wilson on drums. Strong
soloists in their rare spots, but the compositions come first, with
most of the album is woven around the leader's intricate reeds.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Jackie Ryan: <i>Listen Here</i></b> (2012 [2013], Open Art):
Standards singer, six or seven records since 2000; has a deep,
flexible voice that over an album gains stature and authority.
Arranged by bassist John Clayton, features pianist Gerald Clayton,
with Graham Dechter on guitar and selected horn spots -- haven't
heard much from him lately, but Rickey Woodard sounds splendid.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Alex Snydman: <i>Fortunate Action</i></b> (2012 [2013],
self-released): Drummer, lives in Los Angeles, debut album,
mostly piano trio with two cuts adding tenor/soprano sax (Cari
Clements). He uses three pianists -- Doug Abrams (4 cuts), Chris
Pattinshall (3), and Miro Sprague (2) -- and two bassists, with
the pianists writing a bare majority of the songs; Snydman has
3.5 credits, plus covers of Ellington/Strayhorn and Herbie
Hancock. Despite the credits jumble, it all sounds remarkably
consistent.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Al Thompson Jr.: <i>City Mainstream</i></b> (2012 [2013], Alcalgar):
Plays piano/keyboards, sings a bit, based in Connecticut. First album,
a high energy groove thing, the horns stronger than anything the smooth
jazz crowd favors -- gives it some appeal.
<b>B</b></p>

<p><b>Jacob Varmus: <i>Terminal Stillness</i></b> (2012 [2013],
Crows Kin): Trumpet player, from San Francisco, studied at University
of Iowa, based in Brooklyn. Second album, six tracks cut with guitar
(Nate Radley), piano (Kris Davis), bass (Ike Sturm), drums (Brian
Woodruff); two with accordion (Jacob Garchik), bass (Gil Smuskowitz),
and drums; the closer Varmus himself on piano.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Renée Yoxon/Mark Ferguson: <i>Here We Go Again</i></b> (2012 [2013],
self-released): Singer and her pianist, based in Ottawa up in Canada,
second album; original songs, slight edge to Yoxon with about half
credited to both. Band selectively adds trumpet, trombone, sax, and/or
guitar, and they flesh out the sound nicely. She likes to scat, and
isn't bad at it.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p>Some corrections on a recent Jazz Prospecting review:</p>

<p><b>Clipper Anderson: <i>Ballad of the Sad Young Men</i></b> (2008-10
[2013], Origin): Bassist, originally from Montana, based in Seattle
since 1992. Third album, if you count an Xmas with Greta Matassa's
name first, plus a lot of side credits going back to 1984. Anderson
sings as well as plays bass, moldy standards done in the old Sinatra
mold, except that he's not Sinatra, and Darin Clendenin's piano trio
doesn't pack much punch.
<b>B</b></p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p><b>Unpacking:</b> Found in the mail last week:</p>

<ul>
<li><b>Chris Amemiya &amp; Jazz Coalescence: <i>In the Rain Shadow</i></b> (OA2)</li>
<li><b>David Arnay: <i>8</i></b> (Studio N)
<li><b>Lynn Baker Quartet: <i>LectroCoustic</i></b> (OA2)</li>
<li><b>Diego Barber/Hugo Cipres: <i>411</i></b> (Origin)</li>
<li><b>Black Host: <i>Life in the Sugar Candle Mines</i></b> (Northern Spy)</li>
<li><b>Will Calhoun: <i>Life in This World</i></b> (Motéma)</li>
<li><b>Ceramic Dog: <i>Your Turn</i></b> (Northern Spy)</li>
<li><b>Etienne Charles: <i>Creole Soul</i></b> (Culture Shock Music): advance, July 23</li>
<li><b>Corey Christiansen: <i>Lone Prairie</i></b> (Origin)</li>
<li><b>Amos Garrett Jazz Trio: <i>Jazzblues</i></b> (Stony Plain)</li>
<li><b>Christian McBride &amp; Inside Straight: <i>People Music</i></b> (Mack Avenue)</li>
<li><b>Bernie Mora &amp; Tangent: <i>Dandelion</i></b> (Rhombus)</li>
<li><b>The Rempis Percussion Quartet: <i>Phalanx</i></b> (Aerophonic)</li>
<li><b>The Rosenthals: <i>Fly Away</i></b> (American Melody)</li>
<li><b>Colin Stetson: <i>New History Warfare, Vol. 3: To See More Light</i></b> (Constellation)</li>
<li><b>Wheelhouse: <i>Boss of the Plains</i></b> (Aerophonic)</li>
<li><b>Zs: <i>Grain</i></b> (Northern Spy)</li>
</ul>
        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1976-Weekend-Roundup.html" rel="alternate" title="Weekend Roundup" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-05-13T04:17:38Z</issued>
    <created>2013-05-13T04:17:38Z</created>
    <modified>2013-05-13T04:17:38Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1976</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1976</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1976-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Weekend Roundup</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Another last-minute link grab:</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<ul>

<li><p><a href="http://world.time.com/2013/05/09/hizballah-and-israel-spar/">
Nicholas Blanford: Hizballah and Israel Spar as Syria's Conflict Threatens
to Spin Out of Control</a>: Israel's 2006 war against Hezbollah (effectively
Lebanon) should have yielded several clearcut lessons. One is that Hezbollah
is a very effective defensive fighting force against Israeli land assaults.
Another is that Hezbollah's cache of Iranian or Syrian rockets aren't worth
a thing, either as a deterrent against Israeli attack -- if anything, their
existence provoked that attack -- or as an offensive weapon. Yet Hezbollah
is evidently so concerned about maintaining their Syrian weapons pipeline
that they've joined Assad's Syrian army in fighting against the rebels.
Hezbollah's presence in Syria, in turn, gives Israel all the excuse they
think they need to fly into Syria and bomb targets they think are related
to Hezbollah -- presumably pro-Assad forces, although they've also claimed
to be neutral in the Syrian Civil War, and some Israelis have argued they
would prefer Assad (you know, "the devil you know"; see
<a href="http://warincontext.org/2013/05/10/israel-has-no-desire-for-assad-to-fall/">
Israel has no desire for Assad to fall</a>) to stay in power, so they
may not care who they bomb. Needless to say, both Israel and Hezbollah
are making the mess in Syria worse, adding dangerous factors that make
it very likely to spill over into Lebanon, while Israel is just stirring
the pot in Syria, giving all sides more reason to hate it and plot
revenge.</p>
<p>Also see
<a href="http://truth-out.org/news/item/16251-robert-fisk-on-syrias-civil-war-chemical-weapons-theater-and-obamas-backing-of-israeli-strikes">
Robert Fisk</a> talk about Syria, attesting to the extreme brutality of
the war, also questioning the logic of Israel's intervention:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Are they really bombing missiles going to the Hezbollah, the so-called
Fateh-110 missile, which was first test-fired by Iran, what, 11 years
ago? Conceivable. But when you consider the Syrians have also used these
missiles, according to the Americans, last December against rebel forces,
why would they use armaments, which they use against -- in this ferocious
life-and-death battle against the rebels, why should they be shipping
them out of Syria en route to Lebanon, where the Hezbollah don't appear
at the moment to have any need for them, since they have thousands of
other weapons, a weapon which I would have thought the government would
want to keep in Damascus?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Fisk also says something about the state of journalism:</p>
<blockquote><p>
And I think one of the problems is, as I say, this parasitic, osmotic
relationship between journalists and power, our ever-growing ability,
our wish, to -- you know, to rely on these utterly bankrupt comments
from various unnamed, anonymous intelligence sources. And I'm just
looking at a copy of the Toronto <i>Globe and Mail</i>, February 1st,
2013. It's a story about al-Qaeda in Algeria. And what is the sourcing?
"U.S. intelligence officials said," "a senior U.S. intelligence official
said," "U.S. officials said," "the intelligence official said," "Algerian
officials say," "national security sources considered," "European security
sources said," "the U.S. official said," "the officials acknowledged."
I went -- boy, I've got another even worse example here from <i>The Boston
Globe and Mail</i> [ sic ], November 2nd, 2012. But, you know, we might
as well name our newspapers "Officials Say." This is the cancer at the
bottom of modern journalism, that we do not challenge power anymore. Why
are Americans tolerating these garbage stories with no real sourcing
except for very dodgy characters indeed, who won't give their names?
</p></blockquote></li>

<li><p><a href="http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/16149-the-political-roots-of-american-obesity">
E Douglas Kihn: The Political Roots of American Obesity</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
It was during Reagan's first term that the phrase bean counter came into
prominent usage. These were the efficiency experts whose job it was to
increase profits for the major corporations, mainly by introducing
speedups, job consolidations, forced overtime, the hiring of part-time
workers -- along with artful and ruthless union-busting.</p>
<p>This was also the beginning of the "War on Iran," the "War on Drugs,"
the war against the people of Nicaragua and El Salvador (all of them
Marxists doubtless bent on rampaging through the streets of US cities)
and a dangerous escalation of threats against the Soviet Union/Evil
Empire.</p>
<p>As social fear and insecurity rise, mental health declines.</p>
<p>Apparently, so does physical health. According to a new study from
Rice University and the University Colorado at Boulder in Social Science
Quarterly, despite modest gains in lifespan over the past century, the
United States still trails many of the world's countries when it comes
to life expectancy, and its poorest citizens live approximately five
years less than more affluent people. The United States, which spends
far more money on medical care than other advanced industrialized
countries, has the sickest residents in every category of unwellness.
</p></blockquote></li>

</ul>
        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1975-Fuzzy-Red-Lines.html" rel="alternate" title="Fuzzy Red Lines" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-05-12T06:56:00Z</issued>
    <created>2013-05-12T06:56:00Z</created>
    <modified>2013-05-12T07:21:28Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1975</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1975</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1975-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Fuzzy Red Lines</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>A little over two years ago the "Arab Spring" pro-democracy movement
broke out in Syria, a nation that nearly everyone agreed could benefit
from more political freedom, seeing as how it's been ruled by the Assad
family since the 1960s and by one military clique or another even further
back. Similar dictatorships in Tunisia and Egypt fell quickly; struggles
against the dictators of Yemen and Bahrein dragged out inconclusively;
but in Libya and Syria demonstrators were met with violence and some
fraction of the military establishment broke against the regime, plunging
those nations into civil war. Demonstrations in Jordan faded quickly with
a few token reforms. And nothing much happened in Saudi Arabia, probably
the one nation in the region most in need of a democratic overhaul.</p>

<p>One prism into understanding how these movements played out is to
map them against US influence in the region. US interests and actions
in the Middle East have been schizophrenic since the late 1940s when
US administrations found themselves not just allied but in love with
two conflicting suitors: Israel, and Saudi-Arabian oil (although any
oil would do, especially Iran's from 1953-79). One problem was that
those paramours came with a lot of baggage: Israel was constantly at
war with its Arab neighbors and its own [Palestinian] people, forging
an elite militarist culture that thrives on conflict, foments hatred
against everything Arab, and has turned most of world opinion against
them -- the major exception America's own fundamentalist Christians
and militarists. The Saudi ruling family, on the other hand, is joined
at the hip to the most extremely reactionary Salafist Muslim clergy,
and has spent billions of dollars attempting to export their religious
orthodoxy throughout the Middle East and into Afghanistan and Pakistan,
where it turned virulently anti-American. But America's true obsession
was the Cold War, in service of which no tyrant or ideologue could be
found too unsavory. The Israelis and Saudis became expert at camouflaging
their own obsessions as anti-communist fervor, so the US could embrace
them both.</p>

<p>But another facet of America's Cold War obsession was promotion of
democracy, not so much for allies as for countries on the other (or no)
side, but as a contrast to the "unfree" Soviet-style regimes. So when
masses of people demand democracy, our natural tendency is to applaud.
In the cases of Tunisia and Egypt -- secure military allies with tired
and unsavory leaders -- Obama had little reason to resist, so the US
subtly nudged their power structure to go with the flow. In Yemen, one
of Obama's favorite drone-shooting ranges, and Bahrein, with its Shiite
majority possibly tilting toward Iran, the US was more reserved. But
Libya and Syria were rarely US allies, and most of the "brains" behind
US policy in the region -- especially the "neocons" -- have spent most
of their careers bashing their leaders, so the US had no interests in
maintaining them, but also no influence or leverage that could be used
to democratize them. Consequently, the more the US leaned against them,
the less then had to lose by suppressing their revolts violently. In
hindsight, the best way the US could have helped to democratize those
nations would have been to develop normal relations with them. (It is
worth noting that the only Soviet bloc states that didn't democratize
are the ones the US fought wars against, followed by long, grudge-filled
periods of isolation: China, North Korea, Vietnam, Cuba.)</p>

<p>As soon as Libya and Syria broke into civil war, the neocons -- most
vociferously, Senators McCain and Graham, who never miss an opportunity
to plunge us deeper into hell -- and their "liberal hawk" cronies started
crying for the US to intervene. How anyone could think that inserting the
US military into a conflict would save lives is beyond me. (The historical
basis for that idea was probably the NATO intervention in Bosnia. After
just two weeks of bombing, the Serbs accepted a ceasefire and signed the
Dayton Accords ending a war between Serbia and Bosnia that had dragged on
for more than two years. That intervention surely did save lives, at least
if you don't factor in the subsequent Kosovo War, which was made all the
more likely by the expectation that NATO would again intervene against
Serbia -- as it did.) But you can't judge interventions by simply balancing
deaths on one side versus the other. US intervention means that people who
wouldn't have been killed otherwise are now being killed by the US -- a
fact that won't be easily rationalized by the people the US attacked.</p>

<p>Obama did finally agree to intervene in Libya, but only after France
and the UK had committed to do so. US firepower quickly degraded Libya's
military power, and the civil war turned against Gaddafi, ending after
about three months. Obama was careful not to land US troops, or to put
the US into a position where the US would have any responsibility for
postwar administration and reconstruction. Nonetheless, last September
a group of Islamic jihadists attacked the US consulate in Benghazi --
the center of the anti-Gaddafi resistance, presumably the most grateful
city for the US intervention -- killing four Americans, the sort of
blowback that should always be expected. The Benghazi attack has since
become a cause celebre for the Republicans, who have gone so far as to
argue that Obama should be impeached for his "cover up" of the attack.
(As far as I can tell, that "cover up" consisted of nothing more than
Susan Rice making some erroneous statements the day after, confusing
the violent attack in Benghazi with non-violent anti-American protests
elsewhere. I would write more about this if I could make any sense out
of it, but I can't. The one thing I can say is that attacking Obama
for something bad happening after he intervened in Libya isn't likely
to be the most effective way to convince him to intervene in Syria,
where the number of bad things that can happen is much greater.)</p>

<p>Dexter Filkins has a long article,
<a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/05/13/130513fa_fact_filkins?currentPage=all">
The Thin Red Line</a>, on Syria, the pressures put on Obama to intervene
there, and some of the risks. Filkins is one of those reporters for whom
war is just business -- booming, as his book,
<a href="/ocston/books/filkins-forever.php">The Forever War</a>, shows.
He recounts much of what I wrote above on Yugoslavia and Libya, while
only glancingly mentioning less "successful" US interventions like Iraq
and Afghanistan. The title refers to Obama's casual warning to Assad
that Syrian use of chemical weapons would cross a "red line" leading
to US intervention. ("Red lines" have been much in the news lately,
especially regarding Iran's "nuclear program" -- what degree of offense
would "justify" Israel and/or the US to preemptively attack Iran.)
Consequently, advocates of going to war with Syria are scouring the
data for any evidence of poison gas use, under the theory that having
drawn a red line there, Obama will have no choice but to intervene --
the entire credibility of the US is put at stake by Obama's careless
use of jargon.</p>

<p>The Syrian Civil War has resulted in, to pick two recent estimates,
between 70 and 120 thousand deaths, with more than a million refugees,
and many more internally displaced. Those are substantial numbers,
even if they are still less than the death-and-refugee toll of the
Civil War in Iraq that was triggered and abetted by the US invasion
and occupation. (At least no one was so stupid as to urge anyone to
intervene to "save lives" in Iraq. Of course, enforcing a "no fly"
zone against the US would have been difficult, but we are talking
about genocide here, something the world has committed to tolerate
"never again.")</p>

<p>Filkins reports on three options for US intervention: establishing
a "no fly" zone; arming the rebels; and somehow securing Syria's
chemical weapon sites. The "no fly" zone is regarded as more difficult
than it was in Libya because Syria has more sophisticated anti-aircraft
defenses, although they don't seem to cause Israel much trouble. The
bigger problem is that in itself it's unlikely to have much effect --
e.g., on artillery and missiles. One suggestion is to use the "Patriot
anti-missile system" to intercept Syrian SCUD missiles. (Is this the
source of the adage that "Patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels"?)
So it's very likely that a "no fly" zone will be a stepping stone to
deeper involvement, as indeed it was in Libya.</p>

<p>Arming the rebels is relatively easy to do, and is already being done
by Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, and possibly others. However, this gets
real tricky real fast. There are multiple groups of rebels, and some of
them are friendlier to the US than others, and the last thing you want
is to send arms to Al-Qaeda-types in Syria -- which are a formidable part
of the resistance -- who might wind up using the arms against American
targets, so you want to pick and choose who gets what, but in doing so
you're not only arming the rebels against Syria, you're arming them
against each other. And while you might argue that a "no fly" zone is
a neutral way to level the battlefield, arming select groups of the
rebels ends any pretense at neutrality or disinterest. You now have a
"dog in the fight": which is not only bad news for Assad, it's a
challenge for anyone who is wary of American power in the region --
a short list which includes Iran and Russia, even before this revolt
provided Syria with arms. The result is surely an arms race, escalating
even further the level of violence.</p>

<p>Arming the rebels also means forgoing the alternative, which is to
negotiate an arms embargo with Syria's suppliers, and enforce comparable
limits on the rebels' suppliers. The desired effect would be to let the
conflict degrade into a stalemate, which would give both sides reason
to negotiate a power-sharing agreement and move toward a democratic
scheme which protects interests allied with both sides. If the US goes
in and arms the rebels, that option disappears. The rebels become more
convinced in their eventual triumph, cementing their resolve to fight
on. From that point the only way to long-term suffering is to shorten
the war by increasing the rebels' firepower and leverage, which not
only helps them defeat Assad, it also allows them to more completely
dominate the social, ethnic, and tribal groups that had favored Assad.
And it also makes more likely an internecine war between rebel groups --
as happened when the Russians finally quit Afghanistan.</p>

<p>Even Filkins admits that the third option -- securing Syria's chemical
weapons -- is a fool's errand. Nobody knows how many sites there are, how
many munitions there are, where they all are, or much of anything else
about them. What you really need is a UN disarmament team to set up camp
in Syria and track them all down, but for that to happen you have to stop
the shooting, in which case you might as well solve the conflict. As for
the US doing it directly, Filkins reports an estimate that it would take
75,000 troops: the basic scheme there is to conquer the country, then
look for the illicit weapons -- for lessons on how this "works," see
Iraq. Even if you could magically wipe the country clean of chemical
weapons, it's unlikely that the conflit would be less deadly. They wind
up being nothing more than a side-thought: a problem people should have
thought of before starting a war that makes their use much more likely.</p>

<p>Obama has managed to frustrate virtually every side in the conflict.
He never offered any pretense of neutrality, and has gone out of his way
to offend Assad backers from Iran to Hezbollah. He's had better relations
with Russia, but not much. Saudi and Qatari arms shipments inevitably
smell of US approval, as does Israel's recent bombings of Syria -- one
thing the latter does is to test Syria's air defenses, useful research
for that "no fly" zone. The CIA is reportedly on the ground in Syria,
feeding intelligence info to the rebels. On the other hand, it's hard
to tell who's "winning" the war, and nothing Obama has done is likely
to tilt the balance, so he's not winning points with the neocon crowd --
nor should he, given the way they've lashed out at him over Libya, which
he finessed about as elegantly as any American president could.</p>

<p>As far as I'm concerned, Assad's extremely violent counterrevolt is
inexcusable, ensuring his future as an international pariah. However,
the more I read of the rebels, the less sympathetic I am to them, and
the more I fear their possible triumph.
<a href="http://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2013/05/08/road-damascus/oYCHc6T67btNAVoSRyX3dJ/story.html">
Andrew Bacevich</a> makes an interesting point:</p>

<blockquote>

<p>Whatever Obama does or doesn't do about Syria won't affect the larger
trajectory of events. Except to Syrians, the fate of Syria per se doesn't
matter any more than the fate of Latvia or Laos. The context within which
the upheaval there is occurring -- what preceded it and what it portends --
matters a great deal. Yet on this score, Washington is manifestly clueless
and powerless.</p>

<p>History possesses a remarkable capacity to confound. Right when the
path ahead appears clear -- remember when the end of the Cold War seemed
to herald a new age of harmony? -- it makes a U-turn. The Syrian civil
war provides only the latest indication that one such radical reversal
is occurring before our very eyes. For Syria bears further witness to
the ongoing disintegration of the modern Middle East and the reemergence
of an assertive Islamic world, a development likely to define the 21st
century.</p>

<p>Recall that the modern Middle East is a relatively recent creation.
It emerged from the wreckage of World War I, the handiwork of cynical
and devious European imperialists. As European (and especially British)
power declined after World War II, the United States, playing the role
of willing patsy, assumed responsibility for propping up this misbegotten
product of European venality -- a dubious inheritance, if there ever
was one.</p>

<p>Now it's all coming undone. Today, from the Maghreb to Pakistan,
the order created by the West to serve Western interests is succumbing
to an assault mounted from within. Who are the assailants? People intent
on exercising that right to self-determination that President Woodrow
Wilson bequeathed to the world nearly 100 years ago. What these multitudes
are seeking remains to be seen. But they don't want and won't countenance
outside interference.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>If Assad falls, either democratically or by arms, the successor
state will very probably be more conservative, more devoutly Islamist,
and very likely more aggressively anti-American and anti-Israel --
in other words, it will be a state that most Americans who reflexively
clamored for Assad's ouster will find disappointing. And as such it
will ratchet America's frustration with the region even deeper. It
will also be a war-torn wreck, with few prospects of reconstruction
any time soon. Barring US occupation, it is unlikely to become as
corrupt as Iraq or Afghanistan, but like those two disaster areas,
its people has already fragmented into many conflicting identities,
which will continue to tear at the social fabric even after the war
ends. Moreover, as far as the US is concerned, Syria will always be
on the wrong side of Israel, and for that matter the wrong side of
Lebanon, and if those features fade it will revert to no meaning at
all. The only reason McCain and Graham and their ilk care at all
about Syria is that they smell war there, and they see in every war
an opportunity for the US to assert its omnipotence.</p>

<p>I too see war in Syria as a test for the US, and especially as a
test for Obama: the test is whether we can finally see clear to stay
out of a conflict where in the long run we can only hurt ourselves.
The US is so infatuated with itself that it is a sucker for the likes
of McCain and Graham, and Obama has repeatedly allowed himself to be
seduced by American power -- partly, no doubt, because the Republicans
so delight in trash talking to him, taunting him as an apologist,
impugning him for every irresolute doubt. Obama once said that he
wants to change how America thinks about war, but he seems unable
to even change how he himself thinks. Syria is a test of his ability
to pit sanity against jargon, for rarely has a course of action --
intervention -- loomed so temptingly yet been so clearly fraught
with folly.</p>
        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1974-Recycled-Goods-108-May-2013.html" rel="alternate" title="Recycled Goods (108): May 2013" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-05-08T02:46:39Z</issued>
    <created>2013-05-08T02:46:39Z</created>
    <modified>2013-05-08T23:09:59Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1974</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1974</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1974-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Recycled Goods (108): May 2013</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>This edition started with <i>Spin</i>'s recent feature, "Top 100
Alternative Albums of the 1960s"
(<a href="/ocston/nm/lists/spin-alt60s.php">list only</a>,
<a href="http://www.spin.com/articles/best-100-albums-1960s-sixties-alternative-list">
original link</a>, which gets you short reviews if you're patient enough).
When I originally collected the list, I tacked on
my grades and found that I had only heard/rated 42 of the 100. I took
that as a challenge, and have since reduced my unrated list from 58
to 22. I've heard at least some of the remaining music on compilations
(e.g., Desmond Dekker, Mulatu Astatke). I was able to come up with a
couple items not on Rhapsody, and sometimes used Rhapsody but working
back from later reissues. The reviews below sometimes consider more
than one reissue, but often just focus in on the original release (in
whatever state of remastering is current, not that you can tell much
listening to mp3s on a computer).</p>

<p>Any list can be nitpicked, and this one is especially vulnerable.
There's no obvious meaning for "alt" -- a term that <i>Spin</i> treats
as its calling, almost a synonym for interesting -- in the 1960s, so
they've picked a lot of things that are just obscure (and the top of
the list isn't even that: the Velvet Underground, Stooges, Flying
Burrito Brothers, Mothers of Invention, MC5, Captain Beefheart, and
Pink Floyd were at least semi-popular and by now legendary, as is
virtually everything on the <i>Nuggets</i> compilation. Their picks
among singer-songwriters are a very mixed bag (Leonard Cohen, Nick
Drake, Van Dyke Parks, Scott Walker, but no Tim Buckley, Tim Hardin,
or Randy Newman). They picked up some krautrock but paid very little
attention to England, missing proto-prog (Soft Machine, King Crimson)
and much else (Love Sculpture, The Move). And while they did a fair
job of rummaging through American garage rock, they missed the start
of a postmodern retro movement -- I'd say the best really alt-rock
record not on the list is the Flamin' Groovies' <i>Supersnazz</i>
(1969), a fully-realized masterpiece at a time when Alex Chilton
and Dave Edmunds were only beginning to get their shit together.</p>

<p>Still, less than half of the list albums were rock. And, needless
to say, stayed well clear of black music -- exceptions were proto-rap
Watts Prophets, New Orleans funk band the Meters, and if you want to
be generous, Rotary Connection -- and didn't touch country or blues
(although they picked up a few folkies). Most of the rest of the list
was filled out from three slices (13-16 records each): avant-jazz,
postclassical electronica, and world music.</p>

<p>The latter is limited by availability, especially from Africa
where only Babatunde Olatunji and Mulatu Astatke got noticed (no
Franco? Sunny Ade? Rochereau? Fela? Nico? Bebey?) -- Miriam Makeba
was the best known African star, but not exactly alt. Desmond Dekker
was the only Jamaican listed, but Bob Marley, Toots Hibbert, Gregory
Isaacs, and many others finally noticed in the 1970s were already
active. So what did make the list? Three albums each from France
and Brazil -- the latter much more alt than the bossa nova craze
of 1963-65, the former less so -- plus two boogaloo albums from New
York and some field recordings on Nonesuch's Explorer Series.</p>

<p>The avant-jazz list hits a lot of the decade's high points,
including five <i>Penguin Guide</i> crown albums (Ayler, Braxton,
Brötzmann, Coltrane's <i>Ascension</i>, and Dolphy), and many
more picks will be familiar to <i>Penguin Guide</i> followers --
even obscure ones like AMM and Spontaneous Music Ensemble. (But
had they followed <i>Penguin Guide</i> more closely they should
have picked better records for Taylor -- <i>Nefertiti</i> vs.
<i>Unit Structures</i> -- and especially for Sun Ra (and for
that matter Ornette Coleman).</p>

<p>On the other hand, they missed lots of things too, especially
near the dividing line (no Andrew Hill? Sam Rivers? Archie Shepp?
Don Cherry? Steve Lacy? Horace Tapscott? Joe McPhee?). Amalgam's
<i>Prayer for Peace</i> was one of the decade's best (and another
crown album). I'd have been tempted to include Coltrane's <i>A
Love Supreme</i>, which broke a lot of new ground, but they most
likely left it out because everyone so admires it now.</p>

<p>The other big category remains obscure: early electronic music,
mostly done by modernist composers brought up in the euroclassical
curriculum -- Harry Partch is only a partial exception in that he
didn't go in for electronics much, but invented his own instruments
to explore his unique microtonal tunings. Riley and Reich went on
to gather fairly large followings (as did Philip Glass, whose first
record was 1973), but most of these names remain obscure. Some
interesting records made the list, although you might be better
off searching out <i>OHM: The Early Gurus of Electronic Music</i>
(1937-82 [2000], Ellipsis Arts, 3CD) for a more systematic intro.</p>

<p>I mostly spent the month trying to catch up with the <i>Spin</i>
list, but I couldn't help but follow occasional threads. In some
cases I didn't find the listed record but reviewed something else
that I did find (Axelrod, Hardy, Oliveros, Sonics). In others, I
helped myself to an extra record to get a broader idea (Sanders,
Subotnick, 13th Floor Elevators, Walker). In most cases I tried to
focus on the original LP rosters, although in a couple cases I cite
more recent reissues and try to break them down. In the process of
doing this, I also ran across non-alt records I felt like checking
out -- e.g., early LPs by Cream, the Lovin' Spoonful, and the Who --
so I saved them for a second 1960s-themed Recycled Goods, probably
next month. And in a case like Clifford Thornton makes more sense
here -- not that I won't run across more like it next time.</p>

<p>Special thanks to Cam Patterson for helping me track down some
of this music.</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<table align="right", style="margin-left: 6px">
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/va-musicfromthemorning.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/can-monster.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/love-forever.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/nancarrow-studies.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/va-tropicalia.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/barretto-acid.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/cuba-wanted.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/fahey-dance.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/redcrayola-parable.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/seeds-seeds.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/subotnick-silver.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/sunra-futuristic.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/13thfloorelevators-psychedelic.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/13thfloorelevators-easter.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/thornton-freedom.jpg"></td>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/veloso-veloso.jpg"></td></tr>
</table>

<p><b><i>The Balinese Gamelan: Music From the Morning of the World</i></b>
(1966, Nonesuch): An early entry in Nonesuch's Explorer Series, and as
such one of the first serious attempts to discover world music beyond the
usual Latin and Irish confines, David Lewiston's field recordings from
Bali have an anthropological purity to them: clanging, jangly percussion;
odd-pitched strings; occasional high-and-lonesome vocals. Reissued twice
with different covers and subtitles, the prize is the 1988 Nonesuch CD
with two extras, notably the 22:08 "Ramayana Monkey Chant," but Rhapsody
has the 2003 Nonesuch reissue, <i>Indonesia: Bali: Music From the Morning
of the World</i>, which reverts to the LP lineup, time 41:20.
<b>A-</b> [R, dl]</p>

<p><b>Can: <i>Monster Movie</i></b> (1969, Mute): My brief experience
with the Krautrockers spanned three overly regarded 1972-74 albums --
<i>Ege Bamyasi</i>, <i>Future Days</i>, <i>Soon Over Babaluma</i> --
when they were turning into the continent's Yes, so I was surprised
by all the variety shown in <i>The Lost Tapes</i> surprised me, and
this first debut album shows why those were outtakes. The guitar is
derivative, but from the Velvet Underground, and Malcolm Mooney's
vocals offer a frenetic if not fully integrated cross between Lou
Reed and Syd Barrett, but what was uniquely their own was the
drumming that drives the second side to 20:27.
<b>A-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Karen Dalton: <i>It's So Hard to Tell Who's Going to Love You the
Best</i></b> (1969, Capitol): Folk singer, of Cherokee descent, born in
Oklahoma, had two kids by 19, when she ran away to New York. This
was her first album (although some earlier tracks were eventually
released as <i>1966</i>, and there's a live tape from 1962) and she
didn't last long, living on the streets, dying with AIDS; there is
a bit of Billie Holiday in her voice, but her guitar rarely connects
with it -- best chance is on simple blues like "It Hurts Me Too,"
otherwise this takes a lot of effort.
<b>B-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Love: <i>Forever Changes</i></b> (1967 [2001], Elektra/Rhino):
Los Angeles group led by singer-guitarist Arthur Lee, third album,
widely regarded as a landmark -- number 40 on <i>Rolling Stone</i>'s
2003 list of 500 among numerous others (see Wikipedia for pages of
such testimony) -- reputation enough that I gave it a second spin
after being dismayed by the first. I didn't (well, still don't) get
why someone with his guitar chops would drape most of the album in
strings, a sort of ornateness that gets dubbed baroque pop -- not
that you really wind up thinking he's so prissy. More like he just
wants to let the melodies sneak up on you. My CD has bonus cuts I
could do without, and, bought used, lacks a booklet I wish I had.
<b>A-</b></p>

<p><b>Conlon Nancarrow: <i>Studies for Player Piano</i></b> (1969,
Columbia Masterworks): Avant composer from the Arkansas side of
Texarkana, joined the CP in the 1930s and fought in the Abraham
Lincoln Brigade in the Spanish Civil War against Franco -- those
who did were branded "prematurely anti-fascist" and regarded as
security risks by the US, so he moved to Mexico, where he lived
until his death in 1997. These piano pieces are richly abstract,
the speed and difficulty handled by punching them into a player
piano -- the result kind of like Jerry Lee Lewis pounding his
way through Varèse, or Cecil Taylor playing boogie woogie. 1750
Arch Records reissued this in 1977, followed by three more LP
volumes, <i>Complete Studies for Player Piano</i>, and Wergo
came up with a fifth volume in 1988, followed by CD reissues.
Rhapsody's version is the 4CD 2008 release on Other Minds: too
much for a single setting, but I can't say as there's any drop
off in quality.
<b>A-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b><i>Tropicália: Ou Panis Et Circensis</i></b> (1968, Philips):
Mark Kurlansky covered the various student revolts in eastern and
western Europe in his book <i>1968: The Year That Rocked the World</i>,
and paid heed to tumultuous events in the US, but one important place
he missed was Brazil. Tropicália was as politically charged as any
music in the world, with Caetano Veloso the theoretician and Gilberto
Gil the melodist -- they dominate this compilation. While I can't
vouch for the lyrics, I will venture that this builds on MPB like
<i>Sgt. Pepper</i> and <i>Their Satanic Majesties Request</i> moved
beyond the early Beatles and Stones. I wouldn't attribute any of those
leaps to psychedelics, when revolution was so much more mind-blowing.
<b>A</b> [dl]</p>

<h3>Briefly Noted</h3>

<p><b>Amon Düül II: <i>Phallus Dei</i></b> (1969 [2006], Inside
Out/Revisited): First album from the Krautrock band, split off from
the original Amon Düül commune, a mix of layered guitars and keyb,
violin and vibes, percussion from all over, chants, charges, and
choirs; the title track runs 20 minutes, complex and enchanting; the
reissue moves it up front, balancing it off with two bonus tracks,
10 minutes each, extending the vibe.
<b>B+(***)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>David Axelrod: <i>Songs of Experience</i></b> (1969, Capitol):
A producer at Capitol in the late 1960s, this was the second album he put his name to (after
<i>Song of Innocence</i>); instrumental, the sort of high schmaltz
you often get with movie music, with at least one cut ("The Fly")
transcending the level of dreck.
<b>B</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Ray Barretto: <i>Acid</i></b> (1968, Fania): Congalero from
Spanish Harlem, with over sixty records a major figure in salsa and
Latin jazz from 1960 to his death in 2006; this is widely lauded,
as good a place to start as any; two English lyrics don't spoil the
fun, but what you need to hear are the intense rhythm rolls.
<b>A-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Blue Cheer: <i>Vincebus Eruptum</i></b> (1968, Philips):
Blues-rock band from San Francisco, sort of an American version of
Cream although none of the trio were musicians of the same caliber;
starts with a dense "Summertime Blues," good for a cheap hit; no
real hooks in the rest -- they just grind it out.
<b>B+(*)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Bonzo Dog Doo-Dah Band: <i>Gorilla</i></b> (1967, Liberty):
Art school/trad jazz refugees, originally the Bonzo Dog Dada Band
but they decided to go for parody and/or oom-pah -- probably too
many tuba players in the band; not sure how interesting a band can
be that credits Adolf Hitler on vibes and wastes one of their longest
songs boring you with a complaint about being bored.
<b>B+(*)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The Joe Cuba Sextet: <i>Wanted Dead or Alive (Bang! Bang! Push,
Push, Push)</i></b> (1967, Fania): Born in New York in 1931, of Puerto
Rican descent, Cuba played congas and developed an abbreviated, upbeat
strain of salsa, making him "The Father of Latin Boogaloo"; the refrains
here are almost cartoonish, which works for novelty, but the rhythm is
lightyears beyond what we're used to.
<b>A-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Tod Dockstader: <i>Eight Electronic Pieces</i></b> (1961, Folkways):
Musique concrète pioneer, took his fascination with radio noise as a
start and came up with machines to orchestrate those noises; like much
early electronic music, the emphasis is on sound over melody or rhythm --
that he comes up with any is part of the surprise.
<b>B+(*)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The Electric Prunes: <i>I Had Too Much to Dream (Last Night)</i></b>
(1967, Reprise): The title cut was a minor hit (and future nugget), by
far the most impressive thing here, although the trad jazz throwback
"Tunerville Trolley" is a hoot, and the filler attests to the band's
integrity, even where the psychedelic fuzz is muted.
<b>B+(**)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The Electric Prunes: <i>Release of an Oath</i></b> (1968, Reprise):
Nominally the group's fourth album, but the original musicians had all
been swapped out, replaced by composer David Axelrod and producer Dave
Hassinger, who built this out of Jewish and Christian liturgy, like
their previous <i>Mass in F Minor</i> but this 24:46 album has a much
loftier reputation;
<b>B</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>John Fahey: <i>The Dance of Death &amp; Other Plantation Favorites</i></b>
(1964 [1999], Takoma): The guitarist's first album, original pieces (plus
one by Clarence Ashley) rather than the promised historical dip, not that
history doesn't dwell everywhere Fahey picks; the CD adds four covers,
offering the taste of recognition.
<b>A-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Brigitte Fontaine: <i>Comme à la Radio</i></b> (1969, Saravah):
French singer, her voice (here at least) almost as declamatory as
Nico's, a minimalist effect playing off the exotica of the band --
otherwise known as the Art Ensemble of Chicago.
<b>B+(***)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Kim Fowley: <i>Outrageous</i></b> (1968, Imperial): Son of a
Hollywood actor, good enough to launch a career based on playing off
his connections, gaining fame as someone who could get away with crap
no one else could not so much because he could conceptualize it as
because he was utterly shameless -- one such idea was releasing an
LP of blank vinyl; this record took more effort, but once you learn
a few blues chords and can claim incoherent screaming as a freak out
and drugged out ranting as insight, it's really not what you can call
work; and lest he accidentally slipped anything serious in, the title
discounts it.
<b>C-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The Godz: <i>Contact High With the Godz</i></b> (1966, ESP-Disk):
New York folkie band with a half-dozen albums albums on this "anything
the artist wants" label -- no relation to the metal band founded in
1978 in Ohio -- these nine songs run 25:01 including the 1:34 Hank
Williams coda, their most memorable message "all I wanna do is lay
in the sun," repeated 2:56 with strum, bang, and harmonica.
<b>B+(***)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Françoise Hardy: <i>Françoise Hardy</i></b> (1963, Disques Vogue):
French singer-songwriter, a star at home -- the preferred word now seems
to be "icon" -- but no one speaks French here so she's exotic enough to
be considered "alt"; <i>Spin</i> listed her debut, not this -- the second
of five eponymous 1962-65 albums and the only one I could find, but I'm
struck by how stock the arrangements sound.
<b>B+(*)</b> [S]</p>

<p><b>Pierre Henry: <i>Messe Pour Le Temps Présent</i></b> (1967,
Philips): Henry's <i>musique concrète</i> mass, co-written by Michel
Colombier, starts with "Psyché Rock," then "Jericho Jerk" and "Teen
Tonic" -- they rock like "Telstar," earning the sobriquet <i>les jerks
électroniques</i>; the other pieces on what was originally 2LP and in
1997 were expanded into 2CD are indeed <i>concrète</i> -- scratchy,
abstract, atmospheric, which is not such a bad thing; note that even
the Roman Catholic Church, under Vatican II, was hipper than it is
now.
<b>B+(***)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The Meters: <i>The Meters</i></b> (1969, Josie): New Orleans
funk band, with Art (as opposed to Aaron) Neville they didn't sing
much, but pumped the organ, scratched out guitar and bass lines,
and had Ziggy Modeliste on drums, and Allen Toussaint producing.
<b>B+(**)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The Monkees: <i>Head</i></b> (1968, Colgems): Soundtrack to a film
designed to reinvent the TV mophead group as something else -- you
were expecting, maybe, <i>Sgt. Pepper</i>? With its skits and bits
of fractured dialogue, more like <i>The Who Sell Out</i>, except
more literal, a going-out-of-business sale: "hey hey we are the
Monkees/you know we love to please/a manufactured image/with no
philosophies."
<b>B+(**)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The Monks: <i>Black Monk Time</i></b> (1965 [2009], Light in the Attic):
Garage rock band formed by GIs stationed in Germany, cut one obscure
album, turned into a cult item after a 1994 reissue, with tributes and
films since; has some definite sonic quirks, but plays like a long joke,
and wears awful thin in the bonus tracks (e.g., "Cuckoo").
<b>B+(*)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Nico: <i>The Marble Index</i></b> (1969, Elektra): Christa
Päffgen, a German fashion model who gained 15 minutes of fame as an
Andy Warhol superstar, a more on the first Velvet Underground album,
and maybe a few more for her bleak recording career; this was her
second, with John Cale orchestrating, his high church organ mode
at times breaking into chaos, her voice chilled, strucken down.
<b>B+(**)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Pauline Oliveros: <i>Four Electronic Pieces, 1959-1966</i></b>
(1959-66 [2008], Sub Rosa): Long ones, too, running 14-19 minutes,
made up of wave generators and variable-speed tape machines, mostly
noise, much of it sounding like tuning in radio tones only with a
bit less fuzz, and at least some of it headache-inducing, or at least
way too cathartic for everyday listening -- a more novel, and more
artful, <i>Metal Machine Music</i>; that, of course, was the point.
<b>B+(**)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Van Dyke Parks: <i>Song Cycle</i></b> (1968, Warner Brothers): Choir
boy turned LA schmoozer-songwriter, played with the Byrds and Mothers
of Invention but was better known for his work (and drug recreation)
with Brian Wilson during the Beach Boys' darkest (and weirdest) days;
first album, twelve songs, some cartoonish, some I'm not even that
sure of (there's AMG again, with "Baroque Pop" ready to explain
everything, followed by "Psychedelic/Garage").
<b>C+</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Pearls Before Swine: <i>One Nation Underground</i></b> (1967, ESP-Disk):
Singer-songwriter Tom Rapp is basically a mild-mannered folkie, but
his use of Hieronymous Bosch details for album covers made quite
an impression on the LSD-addled -- turns out that psychedelia, like
beauty, is in the pretty much mind of the beholder.
<b>B</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The Pentangle: <i>Basket of Light</i></b> (1969, Transatlantic):
English folk-rock supergroup, with Bert Jansch and John Renbourn on
guitar and Jacqui McShee singing; third album, the guitars gently
turning over one another, the soprano vocals sinking deepest into
the traditional pieces.
<b>B+(**)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Perrey-Kingsley: <i>The In Sound From Way Out!</i></b> (1966,
Vanguard): Jean-Jacques Perrey, from France, and Gershon Kingsley,
from Germany, play early synthesizers on jaunty little tunes they
wrote, mostly punctuated with extra synth sounds that seem inspired
by Spike Jones; electronic music was in its infancy in the 1960s,
but rarely has it been done with this much juvenile mischief.
<b>B+(**)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The Red Crayola: <i>The Parable of Arable Land</i></b> (1967 [1993],
Collectables): Later Red Krayola, a band which more/less still exists,
at least through its latest (2010) release; essential member is Mayo
Thompson, the guitarist who also played for Pere Ubu through the 1980s;
the usual classifications fall way short here: while the "free form
freak-out" pieces here aren't as chaotic as the name suggests, they
are very unconventional, the melodic elements skewed, percussion all
over the place, atonal and arrhthmic and all that, with quasi-songs
slipped in between -- "War Sucks" for one.
<b>A-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The Red Crayola: <i>The Parable of Arable Land</i></b> (1967
[2011], Sonic Boom, 2CD): Consumer options include the bare bones
1993 CD on Collectables, a twofer on Charly that adds their inferior
second album, <i>God Bless the Red Krayola and All Who Sail in Her</i>,
and this vastly expanded edition; this upholds your interest, a case
of "more is more," but caveat emptor: most of the more is redundant,
including both mono and stereo mixes of the album, plus one with the
songs minus the "freak outs."
<b>B+(***)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Rotary Connection: <i>Rotary Connection</i></b> (1968, Cadet
Concept): I'd rather call them an experiment than experimental:
bassist Phil Upchurch had some minor jazz cred, and singer Minnie
Ripperton was black but didn't sound like it (or much of anything
else); mostly they covered contemporary hits -- "Lady Jane," "Soul
Man," "Like a Rolling Stone," "Didn't Want to Have to Do It" --
twisting and tweaking them but not into anything very interesting.
<b>B</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Pharoah Sanders: <i>Tauhid</i></b> (1966, Impulse): Very much
under John Coltrane's spell this early on -- Albert Ayler liked to
refer to Coltrane and Sanders as "the father" and "the son," mostly
because he saw himself as "the holy ghost" -- struggling on two long
pieces (and one short one) spanning the earth and beyond, assisted
by a quintet that included Sonny Sharrock on guitar and Dave Burrell
on piano.
<b>A-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Pharoah Sanders: <i>Jewels of Thought</i></b> (1969, Impulse):
Two side-long pieces, the saxophonist sounding superb except when he
occasionally coughs up a chunk of lung, which can be harrowing; the
double basses can hold your attention for long vamps, and percussion
is suitably exotic, and Leon Thomas alternately warbles and wows.
<b>B+(***)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The Seeds: <i>The Seeds</i></b> (1966 [1987], GNP/Crescendo):
One of the <i>Nuggets</i> bands -- "Pushin' Too Hard" was theirs --
managed to maintain their guitar-punk sound through eleven sharp cuts,
and the CD reissue doesn't lose much tacking on their second album,
<i>A Web of Sound</i>, stretching out to a 14:27 "Up in Her Room."
<b>A-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The Sonics: <i>Introducing the Sonics</i></b> (1967, Jerden):
Tacoma, WA, garage band, got a reboot after their 1965 debut <i>Here
Are the Sonics!!!</i> stiffed, repeating their local hit singles
("The Witch" and "Psycho") but with different filler -- a couple
new originals ("High Time" is the nugget) and some r&amp;b replacing
the familiar r&amp;r covers.
<b>B+(**)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Alexander Spence: <i>Oar</i></b> (1969, Columbia): Canadian guitarist,
sometimes drummer, played in Quicksilver Messenger Service, Jefferson
Airplane, and Moby Grape before he flipped out on acid, was diagnosed
as schizophrenic, and cut his one-and-only solo album; intended as a
demo, comes off as a slow countryish plaint, except for moments when
it flips into something else.
<b>B+(*)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Morton Subotnick: <i>Silver Apples of the Moon</i></b> (1967,
Nonesuch): First album from one of the pioneers of electronic music,
the two 15-minute sides are composed of synthesized blips and bleeps,
a fairly minimal palette by later standards, yet cohere remarkably,
breaking ground both as technology and as music.
<b>A-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Morton Subotnick: <i>The Wild Bull</i></b> (1968, Nonesuch):
Second album, less immediately appealing but with lots more drumlike
sounds, scattered drones, some entering from far stage left, as the
composer is finding more angles to the music; short, a bit less
consistent.
<b>B+(***)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Morton Subotnick: <i>Silver Apples of the Moon/The Wild Bull</i></b>
(1967-68 [1994], Wergo): But not enough to drag this historically
important twofer down.
<b>A-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Sun Ra: <i>The Futuristic Sounds of Sun Ra</i></b> (1961 [1962],
Savoy): The Arkestra lands in New York, if not from Saturn at least
from Chicago, and they celebrate with a little bit of everything they
do, including an odd vocal, flute solos, boogie piano, and percussion
all over the place -- nothing electronic squiggles if that's what you
expect by futuristic, but still way ahead of the times.
<b>A-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The 13th Floor Elevators: <i>The Psychedelic Sounds of the 13th
Floor Elevators</i></b> (1966 [1993], Collectables): Legendary garage
band from Austin, TX; spawned Roky Erickson, or vice versa, but while
Erickson maintained his reputation for idiosyncrasy, this sounds more
like a band, the guitar thick and crunchy, the psychedelic fuzz some
kind of sonic parlor trick, "You're Gonna Miss Me" the hidden nugget.
<b>A-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The 13th Floor Elevators: <i>Easter Everywhere</i></b> (1967
[1993], Collectables): The sonics are less gimmicky -- just as well,
they have their own sound anyway, although it's not solid enough to
wholly capture the Dylan cover, but it works when they go long for
two of their most remarkable songs, "Slip Inside This House" and
"Postures (Leave Your Body Behind)."
<b>A-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The 13th Floor Elevators: <i>Bull of the Woods</i></b> (1968
[1993], Collectables): Third album, "noted for its moody, dreamy,
and fuzzed-out psychedelic sound," which means none of the songs
particularly stand out or even come through all that clearly.
<b>B+(**)</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>The Clifford Thornton New Art Ensemble: <i>Freedom &amp;
Unity</i></b> (1967 [2001], Atavistic): First piece was named
"Free Huey" but the politics were less clear, mostly a desire
to compose complexity and redouble it through improv; leader
plays valve trombone, which with two bases holds the scattered
horns and vibes together, barely.
<b>A-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Townes Van Zandt: <i>For the Sake of the Song</i></b> (1968,
Poppy): The Texas singer-songwriter's first album, shows a promising
sense of detail but it's as flat and repetitive as the dust-swept
plains, the songs all merging into a strange sameness.
<b>B</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Caetano Veloso: <i>Caetano Veloso</i></b> (1969, Philips): The
second of several eponymous albums (sometimes labeled for its first
song, "Irene"), the vocals recorded in jail with accompaniment added
later, ranging from rockish fuzz guitar to slabs of string orch, with
a few songs in English; despite everything, this has a lot of presence.
<b>A-</b> [dl]</p>

<p><b>Scott Walker: <i>Scott</i></b> (1967, Smash): Scotty Engel, changed
his surname when he joined the Walker Brothers, kept it when he split
(given the governor Wisconsin, perhaps he should reconsider, but he has
a much larger following in the UK); first record, mostly mordant songs
from others (Jacues Brel, Barry Mann, Tim Hardin), given Spector-ish
productions and operatic vocals -- not as awful as all that, but sure
has the potential.
<b>B-</b> [R]</p>

<p><b>Scott Walker: <i>Scott 2</i></b> (1968, Smash): No clue why anyone
would consider this "alternative" -- the songs are wrapped in strings,
the lushness only cut by the bad attitude of a voice meant for Broadway;
worth hearing once is Jacques Brel's "The Girls and the Dogs," although
you probably won't like it if you're a girl, or for that matter a dog.
<b>C+</b> [R]</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p><b>Legend:</b> <b>B+</b> records are divided into three levels,
where more <b>*</b> is better. [R] indicates record was reviewed
using a stream from Rhapsody ([X] is some other identified stream
source; otherwise assume a CD). The biggest caveat there is that
the packaging and documentation hasn't been inspected or considered,
and documentation is especially important for reissues. But also my
exposure to streamed records is briefer and more limited, so I'm
more prone to snap judgments -- although that's always a risk.</p>

<p>For this column and the previous 107, see the
<a href="/ocston/arch/cg/">archive</a>. Total records reviewed:
3666 (3227 + 439).</p>

<h3>Additional Consumer News</h3>

<p>Albums on Spin's "Top 100 Alternative Albums of the 1960s" that I
had previously rated:</p>

<ul>
<li><b>AMM: <i>AMMMusic</i></b> (1966, Elektra) [B]</li>
<li><b>Albert Ayler: <i>Spiritual Unity</i></b> (1964, ESP-Disk) [A]</li>
<li><b>Captain Beefheart &amp; His Magic Band: <i>Trout Mask Replica</i></b> (1969, Straight) [A-]</li>
<li><b>Anthony Braxton: <i>For Alto</i></b> (1969, Delmark) [D]</li>
<li><b>The Peter Brötzmann Octet: <i>Machine Gun</i></b> (1968, FMP) [B+]</li>
<li><b>Leonard Cohen: <i>Songs of Leonard Cohen</i></b> (1967, Columbia) [A]</li>
<li><b>Ornette Coleman: <i>Free Jazz</i></b> (1960, Atlantic) [A-]</li>
<li><b>Ornette Coleman: <i>Town Hall 1962</i></b> (1965, ESP-Disk) [B+]</li>
<li><b>John Coltrane: <i>Ascension</i></b> (1966, Impulse!) [B+]</li>
<li><b>Eric Dolphy: <i>Out to Lunch!</i></b> (1964, Blue Note) [A-]</li>
<li><b>Nick Drake: <i>Five Leaves Left</i></b> (1969, Island) [B]</li>
<li><b>Fairport Convention: <i>Liege &amp; Lief</i></b> (1969, A&amp;M) [B+]</li>
<li><b>The Flying Burrito Brothers: <i>The Gilded Palace of Sin</i></b> (1969, A&amp;M) [A+]</li>
<li><b>The Fugs: <i>The Fugs' First Album</i></b> (1965, Folkways) [A-]</li>
<li><b>The Holy Modal Rounders: <i>The Moray Eels Eat the Holy Modal Rounders</i></b> (1968, Elektra) [B+]</li>
<li><b>The Incredible String Band: <i>The Hangman's Beautiful Daughter</i></b> (1968, Elektra) [C]</li>
<li><b>The Roland Kirk Quartet: <i>Rip, Rig &amp; Panic</i></b> (1965, Limelight) [A]</li>
<li><b>MC5: <i>Kick Out the Jams</i></b> (1969, Elektra) [B+]</li>
<li><b>The Mothers of Invention: <i>Freak Out!</i></b> (1966, Verve) [B]</li>
<li><b>The Mothers of Invention: <i>We're Only in It for the Money</i></b> (1968, Verve) [B-]</li>
<li><b>Nico: <i>Chelsea Girl</i></b> (1967, Verve) [B+]</li>
<li><b><i>Nuggets: Original Artyfacts From the First Psychedelic Era</i></b> (1972, Elektra) [A]</li>
<li><b>Babatunde Olatunji: <i>Drums of Passion</i></b> (1960, Columbia) [B+]</li>
<li><b>Os Mutantes: <i>Os Mutantes</i></b> (1968, Polydor) [B+]</li>
<li><b>Pärson Sound: <i>Pärson Sound</i></b> (2001, Subliminal Sounds) [A-]</li>
<li><b>Harry Partch: <i>The World of Harry Partch</i></b> (1969, Columbia) [A]</li>
<li><b>Pink Floyd: <i>The Piper at the Gates of Dawn</i></b> (1967, Columbia) [A]</li>
<li><b>Terry Riley: <i>In C</i></b> (1968, Columbia) [B+]</li>
<li><b>Terry Riley: <i>A Rainbow in Curved Air</i></b> (1969, Columbia) [A-]</li>
<li><b>The Shaggs: <i>Philosophy of the World</i></b> (1969, Third World) [B-]</li>
<li><b>Sonny Sharrock: <i>Black Woman</i></b> (1969, Vortex) [A-]</li>
<li><b>Silver Apples: <i>Silver Apples</i></b> (1969, MCA) [B+]</li>
<li><b>The Spontaneous Music Ensemble: <i>Karyobin</i></b> (1968, Island) [B+]</li>
<li><b>The Stooges: <i>The Stooges</i></b> (1969, Elektra) [A-]</li>
<li><b>Sun Ra: <i>The Heliocentric Worlds of Sun Ra, Vol. 1 &amp; 2</i></b> (1965, ESP-Disk) [B+]</li>
<li><b>Sun Ra and His Solar Arkestra: <i>Other Planes of There</i></b> (1966, Saturn) [B+]</li>
<li><b>Cecil Taylor: <i>Unit Structures</i></b> (1966, Blue Note) [B+]</li>
<li><b>United States of America: <i>United States of America</i></b> (1968, Columbia) [B]</li>
<li><b>The Velvet Underground/Nico: <i>The Velvet Underground &amp; Nico</i></b> (1967, Verve) [A+]</li>
<li><b>The Velvet Underground: <i>White Light/White Heat</i></b> (1968, Verve) [A]</li>
<li><b>The Velvet Underground: <i>The Velvet Underground</i></b> (1969, Verve) [A+]</li>
<li><b>The Zombies: <i>Odessey and Oracle</i></b> (1968, Big Beat) [A-]</li>
</ul>

<p>Also on Spin's "Top 100 Alternative Albums of the 1960s," but unrated by
me that I also couldn't find on Rhapsody:</p>

<ul>
<li><b>Karlheinz Stockhausen: <i>Kontakte</i></b> (1964, WERGO)</li>
<li><b>Steve Reich: <i>Early Works</i></b> (1987, Nonesuch): Rhapsody has 3/5 cuts; what I've heard is graded [B-]</li>
<li><b>White Noise: <i>An Electric Storm</i></b> (1969, Island): had this on LP, but didn't grade</li>
<li><b>The Sonics: <i>Here Are the Sonics</i></b> (1965, Etiquette)</li>
<li><b>Desmond Dekker: <i>This Is Desmond Dekkar</i></b> (1969, Trojan): have three compilations that probably intersect this: <i>Rudy Got Soul: The Early Beverly's Sessions 1963-1968</i> ([2003], Sanctuary/Trojan, 2CD) [B+]; <i>Israelites: The Best of Desmond Dekker</i> (1963-71 [2002], Sanctuary/Trojan) [A-]; and <i>Rockin' Steady: The Best of Desmond Dekker</i> (1963-73 [1992], Rhino) [A-].</li>
<li><b>The Watts Prophets: <i>The Black Voices: On the Streets in Watts</i></b> (1969, FFRR)</li>
<li><b>Françoise Hardy: <i>Françoise Hardy</i></b> (1962, Disques Vogue)</li>
<li><b>The BBC Radiophonic Workshop: <i>BBC Radiophonic Music</i></b> (1968, BBC)</li>
<li><b>Pauline Oliveros: <i>Reverberations: Tape &amp; Electronic Music 1961-1970</i></b> (1961-70 [2012], Important)</li>
<li><b>Dick Hyman: <i>MOOG: The Electric Eclectics of Dick Hyman</i></b> (1969, Command)</li>
<li><b>Moondog: <i>Moondog</i></b> (1969, Columbia Masterworks)</li>
<li><b>David Axelrod: <i>Song of Innocence</i></b> (1968, Capitol): have one compilation that probably intersects here, but includes some additional artists: <i>The Edge: David Axelrod at Capitol Records</i> (1966-70 [2005], Capitol Jazz) [B-].</li>
<li><b>Karlheinz Stockhausen: <i>Gruppen/Carré</i></b> (1968, Deutsche Grammophon)</li>
<li><b>Brigitte Bardot et Serge Gainsbourg: <i>Bonnie and Clyde</i></b> (1968, Fontana)</li>
<li><b><i>Back From the Grave Volume One: Raw 'n' Crude Mid-60s Garage Punk!</i></b> ([1983], Crypt)</li>
<li><b>Nihilist Spasm Band: <i>No Record</i></b> (1968, Allied)</li>
<li><b>The Roscoe Mitchell Art Ensemble: <i>Congliptious</i></b> (1968, Nessa)</li>
<li><b>John Lennon and Yoko Ono: <i>Unfinished Music No. 2: Life With the Lions</i></b> (1969, Zapple)</li>
<li><b>Alan Watts: <i>OM: The Sound of Hinduism</i></b> (1967, Warner Bros.)</li>
<li><b>Mulatu Astatke: <i>Afro-Latin Soul Vol. 1</i></b> (1966, Worthy): have two compilations that probably intersect this: <i>Éthiopiques, Vol. 4: Ethio Jazz and Musique Instrumentale, 1969-1974</i> ([2004], Buda Musique) [A-]; and <i>New York-Addis-London: The Story of Ethio Jazz 1965-1975</i> (1965-75 [2009], Strut) [A-].</li>
<li><b>Cromagnon: <i>Orgasm</i></b> (1969, ESP-Disk)</li>
<li><b>Marshall McLuhan: <i>The Medium is the Massage</i></b> (1968, Columbia)</li>
</ul>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p><b>Update:</b> Changes to David Axelrod.</p>
        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1973-Music-WeekJazz-Prospecting.html" rel="alternate" title="Music Week/Jazz Prospecting" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-05-07T06:24:39Z</issued>
    <created>2013-05-07T06:24:39Z</created>
    <modified>2013-05-07T06:24:39Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1973</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1973</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1973-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Music Week/Jazz Prospecting</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Music: Current count 21383 [21338] rated (+45), 617 [615] unrated (+2).</p>

<p>Not sure how the huge rated bump happened, but the Rhapsody work
doesn't stop with this coming week's rather robust Recycled Goods.
Losing a bit of ground on Jazz Prospecting, but also pulled a couple
old things out of the queue: the Zingaro was literally under a pile
of papers on my desk, something I was vaguely aware of having missed.
The old Moffett album was in the wrong queue, and being an advance
with no spine was impossible to see without rifling through the
discs. Also note two high-B+ piano records (Caine and Taborn).</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<table align="right">
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/fraser-towns.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/zingaro-live.jpg"></td></tr>
</table>

<p><b>Clipper Anderson: <i>Ballad of the Sad Young Men</i></b> (2008-10
[2013], Origin): Bassist, originally from Montana, looks like he's
based in Spokane after various stretches in Portland and Seattle.
Third album, if you count an Xmas with singer Greta Matassa's name
first, plus thirty or so side credits, notably with fellow Montanan
Jack Walrath. Anderson sings here, moldy standards done in the old
Sinatra mold, except that he's not Sinatra, and Darin Clendenon's
piano trio doesn't pack much punch.
<b>B</b></p>

<p><b>Lary Barilleau &amp; the Latin Jazz Collective: <i>Carmen's
Mambo</i></b> (2009-10 [2013], OA2): Conga player, b. 1958 in
Seattle, still based there, first album as far as I can tell,
cut in two sessions, with trombonist Doug Beavers the only other
musicians straddling both.
<b>B</b></p>

<p><b>Michael Bates/Samuel Blaser Quintet: <i>One From None</i></b>
(2011 [2013], Fresh Sound New Talent): Bassist and trombone, leaders
because they do the writing, 5-3 in favor of Bates if you're counting.
Each as 3-5 records already, solid work, as is this. Band includes
Michael Blake (sax), Russ Lossing (keybs), and Jeff Davis (drums).
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Geof Bradfield: <i>Melba!</i></b> (2012 [2013], Origin): Tenor
saxophonist (also credited with soprano sax and bass clarinet here),
fourth album since 2003, a tribute to trombonist and big band arranger
Melba Liston (noting also that two songs are named after band leaders
she worked for: Dizzy Gillespie and Randy Weston). Septet includes
two brass (trumpet and trombone), Jeff Parker on guitar, and Ryan
Cohan on piano, with Bradfield the sole reed player. The arrangements
swing, the horns slide. Ends with a brief Maggie Burrell vocal.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Cactus Truck with Jeb Bishop and Roy Campbell: <i>Live in USA</i></b>
(2012 [2013], Tractata): Dutch sax-guitar-drums trio, guitarist Jasper
Stadhouders also playing some bass; has a previous album, which got them
this US tour, attracting trombonist Bishop and trumpeter Campbell to join
in the mayhem. Three sets packed into one long CD, all but the tail end
flat-out noisy, something I've never enjoyed unless I managed to find
some coherent strand to organize the chaos around. No evidence of that
here.
<b>B-</b></p>

<p><b>Uri Caine/Han Bennink: <i>Sonic Boom</i></b> (2010 [2013], 816
Music): Piano-drums duet, going by the order on the spine instead of
the front cover. Recorded on the drummer's home ground -- "live at the
Bimhuis" -- with Bennink's artwork both inside and out. Looks like
joint improvs aside from "'Round Midnight," which isn't the only debt
to Monk. The drummer is especially superb, and Caine gets hotter and
harder as he learns the ropes.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Tommy Flanagan/Jaki Byard: <i>The Magic of 2: Live at Keystone
Korner</i></b> (1982 [2013], Resonance): Two major pianists, live,
start out with duets on standards (first three: Charlie Parker, Cole
Porter, Duke Ellington), later on alternating solos. Bright and
tinkly, Flanagan seems more at home with the material.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Nick Fraser: <i>Towns and Villages</i></b> (2012 [2013], Barnyard):
Drummer, based in Toronto, has at least one previous album under his own
name, several as Drumheller, a dozen or so side credits. Quartet, modeled
loosely on Ornette Coleman's recent two-bass quartet, this one with Rob
Clutton on double bass and Andrew Downing on cello. They provide an ever
shifting substrate for the horn: Tony Malaby on tenor (and soprano) sax
gives a bravo performance, one of his finest ever.
<b>A-</b></p>

<p><b>Noah Haidu: <i>Momentum</i></b> (2012 [2013], Posi-Tone): Pianist,
second album, a trio with Ariel de la Portilla and McClenty Hunter. Wrote
4 (of 9) cuts, covering Keith Jarrett and Joe Henderson along with more
standard fare. Postbop, energetic, complex, hard to say more.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>The Bill Horvitz Expanded Band: <i>The Long Walk</i></b> (2011
[2013], Big Door Prize): Guitarist, has a handful of albums since 1997;
wrote this for his late brother Phil Horvitz (1960-2005), performed
by a 17-piece band including a lot of orchestral instruments (oboe,
bassoon, French horn, tuba, violin, cello) -- mostly musicians I
recognize. Interesting bits here and there. Can't find anything that
suggests that pianist Wayne Horvitz is related, but he's in the band
here.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>The Alex Levin Trio: <i>Refraction</i></b> (2012 [2013],
self-released): Pianist, from Philadelphia, based in New York, third
album, all standards, none remarkable but the appeal of hearing bits
of great songs floating up from the mainstream piano jazz matrix is
undeniable. Looks like they manage to make most of their living playing
private engagements (first time I've run across Gig Salad). That's a
niche they fit nicely.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>María Márquez: <i>Tonada</i></b> (2012 [2013], Adventure Music):
Singer, from Venezuela, studied at Berklee, moved to San Francisco area;
fifth album since 1985, second on this label. Folkish arrangements,
mostly guitar, some accordion, although there are more upbeat pieces,
even some brass. Has a distinctive voice, slowly grows on you.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Charnett Moffett: <i>The Bridge: Solo Bass Works</i></b> (2011
[2013], Motéma): Bassist, has ten albums since 1987, many more side
credits. This is all solo, and rather than searching out the far out
sounds one can create with bass -- as, e.g., Peter Kowald and William
Parker have done on their solo albums -- Moffett sticks to basics,
picking and a little arco, and features a dozen proven melodies,
adds in eight originals, and keeps them all short and to the point.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Charnett Moffett: <i>The Art of Improvisation</i></b> (2009,
Motéma): Checking on his new record, I noticed that I had never
rated this old one, which I only got an advance promo of and file
it in a queue that I almost never look at -- a risk that wouldn't
have happened had they sent me a final copy. (Actually, this is
two records back; never got the intervening <i>Treasure</i> in
any shape or form.) Don't have the credits, so I don't know how
chores were split up between two guitarists and three drummers,
or which bass Moffett plays where -- my impression is that the
fretless bass guitar gets a workout here. All originals, except
for a Langston Hughes poem spoken by Angela Moffett and a warbly
"Star Spangled Banner"; one more vocal is by Yungchen Lhamo --
no clue what the language is. The bass is always prominent, driving
the groove, incorporating the world, and elaborating on it.
<b>B+(***)</b> [advance]</p>

<p><b>Craig Taborn Trio: <i>Chants</i></b> (2012 [2013], ECM):
Pianist, from Minneapolis; cut an early album for DIW in 1994,
two "Blue Series" albums that established his reputation as one
of the few distinctive electric keyb players in jazz, a couple
avant exercises on European labels (Clean Feed and ILK), and a
very well received acoustic solo for ECM. This trio, with Thomas
Morgan and Gerald Cleaver, should be his crowning success, but
I keep coming up a bit short with it.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Rich Thompson: <i>Less Is More</i></b> (2012 [2013], Origin):
Drummer, third album, basically a hard bop quintet, with Gary Versace
in piano and organ, the two horns Terrell Stafford and Doug Stone.
One original, the title cut (although bassist Jeff Campbell also
kicks in one), two Rodgers &amp; Hart covers, most of the rest from
a who's who of jazz in the 1960s (Kenny Dorham, Ornette Coleman,
Wayne Shorter, Joe Henderson).
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Carlos Alves "Zingaro"/Jean Luc Cappozzo/Jerome Bourdellon/Nicolas
Lelievre: <i>Live at Total Meeting</i></b> (2010 [2012], NoBusiness):
Violin, trumpet/bugle, flutes/bass clarinet, percussion, respectively,
a prickly combination. Zingaro, b. 1948 in Portugal, came out of the
postclassical avant-garde with a long discography. Cappozzo has a few
albums, including one with Herb Robertson called <i>Passing the Torch</i>.
Don't know the others, but the drummer is terrific, someone to watch
out for. Three long improv pieces, difficult but dazzling, kept a smile
on my face all the way through.
<b>A-</b></p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p><b>Unpacking:</b> Found in the mail last week:</p>

<ul>
<li><b>Rodrigo Amado Motion Trio + Jeb Bishop: <i>The Flame Alphabet</i></b> (Not Two)</li>
<li><b><i>Anomonous</i></b> (Prom Night)</li>
<li><b>Dieuf-Dieul de Thiès: <i>Aw Sa Yone Vol. 1</i></b> (Teranga Beat)</li>
<li><b>Marko Djordjevic &amp; Sveti: <i>Something Beautiful 1709-2110</i></b> (Goalkeeper)</li>
<li><b>Satoko Fujii Ma-Do: <i>Time Stands Still</i></b> (Not Two)</li>
<li><b>Satoko Fujii New Trio: <i>Spring Storm</i></b> (Libra)</li>
<li><b>Trilok Gurtu: <i>Spellbound</i></b> (Sunnyside)</li>
<li><b><i>Harifinso: Bollywood Inspired Film Music From Hausa Nigeria</i></b> (Sahel Sounds)</li>
<li><b>Lynn Jolicoeur and the Pulse: <i>World Behind Your Eyes</i></b> (self-released)</li>
<li><b>Roger Kellaway &amp; Eddie Daniels: <i>Duke at the Roadhouse: Live in Santa Fe</i></b> (IPO)</li>
<li><b><i>Kenya Special: Selected East African Recordings From the 1970s &amp; '80s</i></b> (Soundway, 2CD)</li>
<li><b>New York Art Quartet: <i>Call It Art</i></b> (1964-65, Triple Point, 5LP)</li>
<li><b>Nick Sanders Trio: <i>Nameless Neighbors</i></b> (Sunnyside)</li>
<li><b><i>Sedayeh Del</i></b> (Pharaway Sounds)</li>
<li><b>Sweet Talk: <i>Glitterbomb</i></b> (Prom Night): advance</li>
<li><b>Frank Wess: <i>Magic 101</i></b> (IPO)</li>
</ul>
        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1972-Weekend-Roundup.html" rel="alternate" title="Weekend Roundup" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-05-06T05:56:36Z</issued>
    <created>2013-05-06T05:56:36Z</created>
    <modified>2013-05-06T05:56:36Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1972</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1972</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1972-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Weekend Roundup</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Didn't squirrel away any links last week, but came up with a few
anyway.</p>

<ul>

<li><p><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2013_05/right_to_revolution_and_the_pr044552.php">
Ed Kilgore: America Haters</a>: A recent
<a href="http://www.upi.com/blog/2013/05/02/Poll-29-of-Americans-think-armed-revolution-coming-soon/3901367495881/">
poll</a> found that 29% of Americans agree with the statement, "In the next
few years, an armed revolution might be necessary in order to protect out
liberties." The poll also found that 25 percent of voters "believe the
American public is being lied to about the Sandy Hook elementary school
shooting 'in order to advance a political agenda.'" The NRA had a convention
last week where the incoming president called for a "culture war" but at
least they stopped short of adopting a new slogan like, "Guns: they're
not just for self-defense any more."</p>
<blockquote><p>
Why is revolutionary rhetoric becoming so routine these days? Some of it
stems from the kind of "constitutional conservatism" that raises every
political or policy dispute to a question of basic patriotism or even
obedience to Almighty God. But a big part of it can also be attributed
to cynical opportunists who manipulate those fearful (usually without
much cause) of tyranny for their own very conventional ends -- usually
power and money.</p>
<p>Wherever you think it's coming from, it needs to stop, and if it
can't stop, it must be made disreputable as part of ordinary partisan
politics.</p>
<p>At a minimum, those who toy with the idea of overthrowing our government
to stop Obamacare or prevent gun regulation need to stand up to the charge
that they hate America. It will make them crazy to hear it, but it's the
truth.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This puts several observations together. One is that nearly everything
conservatives put forward these days is objectively damaging to the lives
and welfare of large segments of the American public. Austerity is a good
example: it directly hurts everyone the government had previously attempted
to help, plus it drags down the economy weakening the labor market -- i.e.,
the job security and prospects of everyone who works for a living. Another
observation is that many of the people who support conservatives clearly
do hate large segments of the American people. Add those up and you have
to wonder whether conservative policies aren't just foolishly misguided
but deliberately malevolent. And since then intend to hurt some Americans,
how many targets does it take to add up to hating America?</p></li>

<li><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/05/austerity_never_works_deficit_hawks_are_amoral_and_wrong/">
Robert Kuttner: Austerity Never Works: Deficit Hawks Are Amoral -- and
Wrong</a>: An excerpt from his new book, <i>Debtor's Prison: The Politics
of Austerity Versus Possibility</i> (Knopf):</p>
<blockquote><p>
In today's economy, which is dominated by high finance, small debtors
and small creditors are on the same side of a larger class divide. The
economic prospects of working families are sandbagged by the mortgage
debt overhang. Meanwhile, retirees can't get decent returns on their
investments because central banks have cut interest rates to historic
lows to prevent the crisis from deepening. Yet the paydays of hedge
fund managers and of executives of large banks that only yesterday
were given debt relief by the government are bigger than ever. And
corporate executives and their private equity affiliates can shed
debts using the bankruptcy code and then sail merrily on.</p>
<p>Exaggerated worries about public debt are a staple of conservative
rhetoric in good times and bad. Many misguided critics preached austerity
even during the Great Depression. As banks, factories and farms were
failing in a cumulative economic collapse, Andrew Mellon, one of
America's richest men and Treasury secretary from 1921 to 1932,
famously advised President Hoover to "liquidate labor, liquidate
stocks, liquidate farmers, liquidate real estate&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.
it will purge the rottenness out of the system. High costs of living
and high living will come down. People will work harder, live a more
moral life." The sentiments, which today sound ludicrous against the
history of the Depression, are not so different from those being
solemnly expressed by the U.S. austerity lobby or the German Bundesbank.
[&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;]</p>
<p>The combination of these two trends -- declining real wages and
inflated asset prices -- led the American middle class to use debt as
a substitute for income. People lacked adequate earnings but felt
wealthier. A generation of Americans grew accustomed to borrowing
against their homes to finance consumption, and banks were more than
happy to be their enablers. In my generation, second mortgages were
considered highly risky for homeowners. The financial industry
rebranded them as home equity loans, and they became ubiquitous.
Third mortgages, even riskier, were marketed as "home equity lines
of credit."</p>
<p>State legislatures, meanwhile, paid for tax cuts by reducing
funding for public universities. To make up the difference, they
raised tuition. Federal policy increasingly substituted loans for
grants. In 1980, federal Pell grants covered 77 percent of the cost
of attending a public university. By 2012, this was down to 36
percent. Nominally public state universities are now only 20 percent
funded by legislatures, and their tuition has trebled since 1989.
By the end of 2011, the average student debt was $25,250. In mid-2012,
total outstanding student loan debt passed a trillion dollars, leaving
recent graduates weighed down with debt before their economic lives
even began. This borrowing is anything but frivolous. Students without
affluent parents have little alternative to these debts if they want
college degrees. But as monthly payments crowd out other consumer
spending, the macroeconomic effect is to add one more drag to the
recovery.</p>
<p>Had Congress faced the consequences head-on, it is hard to imagine
a deliberate policy decision to sandbag the life prospects of the next
generation. But this is what legislators at both the federal and state
levels, in effect, did by stealth. They cut taxes on well-off Americans
and increased student debts of the non-wealthy young to make up the
difference. The real debt crisis is precisely the opposite of the one
in the dominant narrative: efficient public investments were cut,
imposing inefficient private debts on those who could least afford
to carry them.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The 1929 and 2008 crashes are more similar than most people recognize:
if you look at charts of economic output, they start at almost the same
trajectory and spread equally fast throughout the world. The difference
is that the latter crash was arrested in early 2009, the result of three
things: a much larger public sector which was (at least initially) free
from the crash mentality; automatic stabilizers like unemployment
insurance and welfare; and extraordinary government intervention to
prop up failing banks. Perversely, since so much of the recovery was
pushed through the banking system, the rich were the first satisfied
by the recovery, and they celebrated by engineering an economic pogrom
against the middle class: they used the crisis to depress the labor
market, and they lobbied for more austere government to cut services
and put further pressure on wages. Consequently, the human costs of
the current recession rival the 1930s -- the big stories of the last
few weeks concern the number of long-term unemployed and the stigma
against them, and a sudden increase in the suicide rate of Boomers --
but there is scarcely any viable political effort to help out. To me,
the most striking difference between Obama and FDR was that the latter
was pre-occupied with keeping both wages and prices up, whereas Obama
doesn't seem to grasp that there is even an issue here.</p></li>

<li><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/05/03/the_real_reason_not_to_intervene_in_syria/">
Jordan Smith: The Real Reason Not to Intervene in Syria</a>: Well,
<i>one</i> real reason:</p>
<blockquote><p>
More generally, a significant body of international-relations scholarship
suggests that not only can outside intervention in humanitarian emergencies
in places like Rwanda not ameliorate the situation -- it can actually make
things worse. Even simply dispensing aid can prolong suffering, in what the
former Doctors Without Borders leader Fiona Terry calls "the paradox of
humanitarian action."</p>
<p>Why are humanitarian interventions so difficult? Kuperman theorizes that
when rebels are assisted by outside forces, they are unintentionally
encouraged to become more reckless in fighting a regime or provoking it,
resist negotiations, and expand their ambitions. Intervention can thereby
produce a perverse situation of prolonging a conflict that results in more
deaths. He calls this the "moral hazard of humanitarian intervention."
Even the expectation or the mistaken belief of outside support can
encourage rebels to continue fighting or resist settlements.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Another real reason is that military interventions in other countries
is a bad habit that the United States sorely needs to break. The reason
is not just because it doesn't work out very well -- Afghanistan and Iraq
are recent examples, but you can go back to 1898 and find more examples
in Cuba and the Philippines, and most of the cases in between (especially
including CIA operations) are more/less as unambiguous. But even if we
(or, say, a more appropriate body, like the UN) could push a button and
magically bring the conflict to a close, ask yourself what that solution
would look like. It wouldn't be to tilt the arms balance so the rebels
could take over, since doing that would only create a new regime at war
attempting to suppress yet another segment of the Syrian public. No, such
a solution would be to arrange a ceasefire, an amnesty, and a democratic
path forward with sufficient minority protections. I don't know whether
Obama has tried to do that, but many decades of hostilities between the
US and Syria have resulted in the US having very little leverage there.
(Egypt, for instance, was a different case: the US had a longterm military
alliance there which helped to ease Mubarak from office.) Maybe Russia,
China, and Iran could have more influence on the Assad regime, but the
US doesn't have a lot of influence with them either.</p>
<p>Smith goes on to write:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The humanitarian impulse is a noble one, spurred by good intentions.
But good intentions, even if they don't pave the road to hell, can
sometimes take us a good way there.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I would caution, though, that not every "humanitarian impulse" is
a noble one. Individuals, perhaps, but nations rarely practice foreign
policy to attain nobility. They usually have some sort of interest or
agenda, and one should be especially suspicious of a nation that claims
to be the advocate and defender of free markets, since the only acts
expected in the market are ones that advance self-interests.</p></li>

<li><p><a href="http://www.thenational.ae/thenationalconversation/comment/sidelining-palestinians-in-israel-will-doom-prospects-for-peace#full">
Ben White: Sidelining Palestinians in Israel Will Doom Prospects for
Peace</a>: Headline's a bit off as there are no "prospects for peace,"
but the real point to draw here is that the longer Israel's occupation
of the West Bank and Gaza continues, the more the brutality Israelis --
both the IDF and settlers often acting on their own -- is reflected
back on the second-class citizens of Israel.</p>
<blockquote><p>
In mid-April, the United States state department published its annual
human rights review -- and the country report for Israel makes for
interesting reading. An ally praised in public as the embodiment of
liberal democratic values in a "tough neighbourhood" is described as
practising "institutional discrimination" against its own Palestinian
citizens (the so-called Israeli Arabs).</p>
<p>Even in a far-from-comprehensive summary of Israel's systematic
racism, the report notes discrimination in the education system, the
land regime and housing, and the legal restrictions on a Palestinian
from the West Bank or Gaza living with his or her spouse in Israel.
[&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;]</p>
<p>But it is not just discrimination and segregation that raise concerns.
There are those in Israel who would like to be rid of Palestinian citizens
altogether -- and see an opportunity to do so in the context of the "peace
process."</p>
<p>Responding to recent protests by Palestinian citizens to mark their
expulsion in 1948, the former foreign minister and current chair of the
Knesset foreign affairs and defence committee, Avigdor Lieberman, called
the Nakba commemoration events proof that "any arrangement with the
Palestinians must include Israeli Arabs as well".
</p></blockquote></li>

</ul>
        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1971-Music-WeekJazz-Prospecting.html" rel="alternate" title="Music Week/Jazz Prospecting" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-04-29T19:16:28Z</issued>
    <created>2013-04-29T19:16:28Z</created>
    <modified>2013-04-29T19:16:28Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1971</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1971</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1971-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Music Week/Jazz Prospecting</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Music: Current count 21338 [21302] rated (+36), 615 [618] unrated (-3).</p>

<p>Probably spent more time last week working on Rhapsody Streamnotes
(posted) and Recycled Goods (still in progress) than Jazz Prospecting,
but got off to a good start when two (of three) Ivo Perelman titles
came through, then two more albums got big lifts from their sax players.
Result is probably the best quality week of the year so far -- actually
even better if I count two Rhapsody A- albums (Allison Miller, already
posted, and Roscoe Mitchell, in the file for May). More promising
things in the mail, too.</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<table align="right">
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/hammond-cathedrals.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/morrison-sunday.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/perelman-art.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/perelman-serendipity.jpg"></td></tr>
</table>

<p><b>JD Allen: <i>Grace</i></b> (2012 [2013], Savant): Tenor saxophonist,
from Detroit; has a handful of albums since 1999. Originally a hard charger,
has backed off quite a bit lately, especially here. Quartet includes Eldar
Djangirov on piano, playing with exceptional delicacy.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Duo Baars-Henneman: <i>Autumn Songs</i></b> (2012 [2013], Wig):
Ig Henneman on viola, Ab Baars on tenor sax, clarinet, shakuhachi.
Henneman tends to lead, pushing the limits of high lonesome. Baars
is complementary, especially on clarinet.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Michiel Braam: <i>EBraam 3</i></b> (2012 [2013], BBB): Dutch
avant pianist, just credited with "keys" here, his bassist Pieter
Douma on bass guitar, with Dirk-Peter Kölsch on drums, a group he
calls "eBraam (in which case the album is just <i>3</i>). Closes
with a Hugh Hopper song -- not sure who does the vocal, but it
comes as a surprise.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Cristina Braga: <i>Samba, Jazz and Love</i></b> (2012 [2013], Enja):
From Brazil, plays harp and sings, tenth album since 1998 (according to
AMG), some classical, but her 2010 <i>Harpa Bossa</i> started to recast
classic samba using harp instead of guitar, and this continues in that
quest. Group includes trumpet, bass, vibes, and percussion, the harp not
all that obvious until your clued in. Voice reminds one of Astrud
Gilberto.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Kaylé Brecher: <i>Spirals and Lines</i></b> (2012, Penchant Four):
Singer, based in Philadelphia, fifth album since 1992. Don't see song
credits but most seem to be originals -- obvious covers are "When Johnny
Goes Marching Home" and "Brother, Can You Spare a Dime," but she segues
the latter into a corny patriotic anthem ("The House I Live In") and
updates a Mingus blues for the white collar world. Long list of
musicians, none I had heard of, shuttle in and out, including four
trumpet/flugelhorn players and three trombonists but her favorite
accompanist is Jimmy Parker on sousaphone -- mine too.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Boyd Lee Dunlop: <i>The Lake Reflections</i></b> (2012 [2013],
Mr. B Sharp): Pianist, b. 1926 in North Carolina and spent most of his
life in Buffalo, working in steel mills and railyards and playing piano
in clubs at night; a local Hall of Famer but only cut his first album
after turning 85. This is his second, solo piano improvisations; doesn't
try to dazzle you, but keeps the ideas flowing.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Ross Hammond Quartet: <i>Cathedrals</i></b> (2013, Prescott):
Guitarist, based in Sacramento, CA; has a handful of albums. Last
cut here is a duet with drummer Alex Cline, a good chance to hone
in on Hammond's attractive technique. But the rest of the album is
dominated by Vinny Golia (tenor and soprano sax, flute) in an amazing
tour de force that reduces Cline to keeping metronomic time. Steuart
Liebig plays bass.
<b>A-</b></p>

<p><b>Barbara Morrison: <i>A Sunday Kind of Love</i></b> (2010-12
[2013], Savant): Singer, b. 1952 in Michigan, got her start opposite
Eddie "Cleanhead" Vinson in 1974, toiled a couple decades in the
Johnny Otis Show, has a dozen records since 1995. I haven't heard
any of them, but would be real surprised if any hold a candle to
this one. The secret isn't a fine-but-who-are-they pianio trio --
Stuart Elster? Richard Simon? Lee Spath? -- so it must be Houston
Person, who is more than just featured here. But it's the singer
who hits one softball after another out of the park: "I'm Just a
Lucky So and So," "The Green Door," "A Sunday Kind of Love," "On
the Sunny Side of the Street," "Let's Stay Together" -- only "I
Cover the Waterfront" is out of her zone. Exquisite: the medley
of "Smile/Make Someone Happy." I dare anyone not to.
<b>A</b></p>

<p><b>New York Voices: <i>Live: With the WDR Big Band Cologne</i></b>
(2008 [2013], Palmetto): Long-running vocal group, down to a quartet
here -- Darmon Meader, Kim Nazarian, Lauren Kinhan, Peter Eldridge --
with seven albums since 1989. This is a live shot backed by the WDR
Big Band Cologne -- a sharp group we've heard with damn near everyone,
and here they provide uniformly solid support, a big help for a group
where the voices slide all over the place.
<b>B-</b></p>

<p><b>Ivo Perelman/Matthew Shipp: <i>The Art of the Duet, Volume
One</i></b> (2012 [2013], Leo): The Brazilian avant-saxophonist has
been releasing records at a furious pace recently, including two
batches of three each last year, and three more recently. All of
this batch include Shipp, who played piano in David S. Ware's
now-legendary quartet among much else, including a 1996 duet with
Perelman (<i>Bendito of Santa Cruz</i>). Over the last two years
no one has produced more top flight music than Perelman, but I'm
starting to wonder if we're getting too much of the same thing.
At least that's where I was stuck on the two new quartet albums,
but the duets here are clear and sparkling, both sides coherent
and connected. Not that the inevitable <i>Volume Two</i> won't
be too much&nbsp;.&nbsp;.&nbsp;. On to the quartets.
<b>A-</b></p>

<p><b>Ivo Perelman: <i>The Edge</i></b> (2012 [2013], Leo): Tenor
sax quartet with Matthew Shipp (piano), Michael Bisio (bass), and
Whit Dickey (drums) -- Dickey goes way back with Shipp, and Bisio
is the current bassist in Shipp's piano trio. Perelman indeed seems
on edge early on, where the going is rougher than need be, but he
does finds himself by the end.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Ivo Perelman: <i>Serendipity</i></b> (2011 [2013], Leo):
Another tenor sax quartet, reportedly accidental: session was
originally scheduled to be trio with Matthew Shipp (piano) and
Gerald Cleaver (drums) -- that trio was recorded a week later
as <i>The Foreign Legion</i> -- but when one was late they
called in bassist William Parker and wound up with a quartet.
Sometimes hard to judge exactly what Parker adds, but Perelman
is remarkably relaxed and fluid from the start, and builds up
to some of his most impressive blowing ever.
<b>A-</b></p>

<p><b>Jan Shapiro: <i>Piano Bar After Hours</i></b> (2012 [2013],
Singing Empress): Standards singer, came out of St. Louis and wound
up teaching at Berklee. Has at least three previous albums. This
one is almost only accompanied by piano, with five pianists in
rotation -- one cut has bass and drums. A very precise, disciplined
vocalist, she doesn't need much help, but great songs work better
than not-so-great ones.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Melvin Taylor: <i>Taylor Made</i></b> (2012 [2013], Eleven East):
Guitarist, sings some -- one song here, with another sung by Bernell
Anderson, no better -- has a half-dozen albums going back as far as
1982. Band includes bass (a second Melvin Taylor), keyboard, and drums.
Six songs, one from Isaac Hayes. Nice little groove record.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Uptown Vocal Jazz Quartet: <i>Hustlin' for a Gig</i></b> (2012,
Housekat): Ginny Carr, Robert McBride, André Enceneat, and Holly Shockey,
with all but one of the songs penned by Carr ("This Is the Life"). Third
group album, but they (Carr and McBride, at least) claim to have been
together for twenty-some years. The spirited interplay and cleverness
wears on you (or me, anyway).
<b>B-</b></p>

<p><b>John Vanore &amp; Abstract Truth: <i>Culture</i></b> (2012 [2013],
Acoustical Concepts): Trumpet player, came up in Woody Herman's band,
should explain his taste in bright and brassy. Fourth album with his
unconventional big band Abstract Truth. Pieces include a 3-part suite
and an arrangement of "Footprints." Strong solos, some interesting
quirks in the arrangements.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Bob Wolfman: <i>Transition</i></b> (2012, self-released):
Guitarist-singer-songwriter, from New York, first album, produced by
Larry Coryell with piano, bass, and drums. Aside from the blues cover
("Born Under a Bad Sign") Wolfman's a truly awful singer. Some nifty
guitar work here and there -- until proven otherwise, I'd chalk that
up to Coryell.
<b>C</b></p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p><b>Unpacking:</b> Found in the mail last week:</p>

<ul>
<li><b>Lucian Ban/Mat Maneri: <i>Transylvanian Concert</i></b> (ECM): advance, May 28</li>
<li><b>Perry Beekman: <i>So in Love: Perry Beekman Sings and Plays Cole Porter</i></b> (self-released)</li>
<li><b>Jerry Bergonzi: <i>By Any Other Name</i></b> (Savant)</li>
<li><b>François Carrier/Michel Lambert/John Edwards/Steve Beresford: <i>Overground to the Vortex</i></b> (Not Two)</li>
<li><b>Freddy Cole: <i>This and That</i></b> (High Note)</li>
<li><b>Steven Lugerner: <i>For We Have Heard</i></b> (NoBusiness/Primary)</li>
<li><b>Allison Miller's Boom Tic Boom: <i>No Morphine No Lillies</i></b> (Foxhaven/Royal Potato Family)</li>
<li><b>Sex Mob: <i>Cinema, Circus &amp; Spaghetti: Sex Mob Plays Fellini</i></b> (The Royal Potato Family)</li>
<li><b>Marlene Ver Planck: <i>Ballads . . . Mostly</i></b> (Audiophile)</li>
<li><b>Yellowjackets: <i>A Rise in the Road</i></b> (Mack Avenue): advance, May 27</li>
</ul>
        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1970-Music-WeekNo-Jazz-Prospecting.html" rel="alternate" title="Music Week/No Jazz Prospecting" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-04-28T23:44:30Z</issued>
    <created>2013-04-28T23:44:30Z</created>
    <modified>2013-04-28T23:44:30Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1970</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1970</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1970-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Music Week/No Jazz Prospecting</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Some scattered links I squirreled away during the previous week:</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<ul>

<li><p><a href="http://pitchfork.com/features/paper-trail/9104-devon-powers/">
Eric Harvey: Writing the Record</a>: Interview with Devon Powers, author of
<i>Writing the Record: The Village Voice and the Birth of Rock Criticism</i>,
which focuses on Richard Goldstein and Robert Christgau. Lots of stuff
here, and I should probably dig into the book. One comment I have, based
on this quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>
When Christgau talks about monoculture, he's talking about the idea
that there was a period before fragmentation. A period before audiences
were segmented, where all kinds of people were listening to the same
thing, some of it out of necessity just because there weren't other
options. When you have people who are listening to the same kind of
things, they have something in common to talk about that they simply
don't when there is more variance in the media landscape.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Two problems here. One is that monoculture means something else:
not a single all-encompassing culture but an isolated stripe of only
one thing -- as in agriculture: wheat, soybeans, oranges, etc. --
which may coexist independently with lots of other monocultures.
Music has never been that formally constrained, and never will be,
in large part because it's always being mediated and deconstructed,
and most often as a social activity. The other is that the idea of
integrating most musical strands into a common pool of experience
was new in the late 1960s, itself a political project rooted in
the newfound equal integration of all divisions in a relatively
classless society. It didn't exist earlier because people grew up
in a divided (segregated) world, and since then the right-wing
counterrevolution with its increasing inequality has done all it
could to strain the ideal.</p>
<p>Paul Krugman and others have made a big point recently about
"the great compression" which reduced income and wealth inequality
and culminated in the 1960s. I must say that it didn't feel like
much of a class-free utopia at the time, but the idea was present,
and there was a sense of it being progressively realized -- and
that sense of progress helped fuel the great upheavals of the
decade, including the civil rights and women's movements. Still,
that atmosphere of equality was propitious for critics inclined
to jump from genre to genre, to poke into music from all over the
world, and who believed that popular music could storm the citdels
of "high culture" -- the last refuge of the ancien regime.</p>
<p>Circa 1973, I dropped out of college, stopped reading critical
theory, and took up rock crit. Seemed like the way forward, and
was practical at the same time.</p></li>

<li><p><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/25/bush_family_furiously_selling_itself_to_americans_once_again/">
Alex Parrene: Bush Family Furiously Selling Itself to Americans Once
Again</a>: As ever, Bush realizes the importance of timing when rolling
out a new "product" -- his library, of course, but that's the easy part
given that every ex-president (at least from Truman on) has one (and a
figure as insignficant as Gerald Ford has two). The harder part is
rehabilitating the entire family brand name, but polls indicate the
ignorance of the average American is hard to underestimate -- I very
much blame Obama and the Democrats for letting Bush off the hook.</p>
<p>More Bush links:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/political-animal-a/2013_04/what_was_the_single_worst_thin044412.php">
Kathleen Geier: What Was the Single Worst Thing About George W. Bush's
Presidency?</a> "Lying was institutionalized to a degree that we rarely
see outside outside of explicitly authoritarian, anti-democratic regimes."</li>
<li><a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/04/27/the-great-degrader/">
Paul Krugman: The Great Degrader</a>: "Bush brought an unprecedented level
of systematic dishonesty to American political life, and we may never
recover."</li>
<li><a href="http://www.salon.com/2013/04/27/bush_is_not_back_and_he_is_still_terrible/">
Alex Seitz-Wald: How to Debunk George W. Bush's Attempts at Revisionism</a></li>
</ul>
<p>My vote for the single worst thing about George W. Bush goes to his
instinctive, visceral attrraction to violence as a way of solving problems.
Even before 9/11, Bush rejected the Saudi peace plan for Israel-Palestine
by saying (as
<a href="/ocston/books/suskind-one.php">
Ronald Suskind reported</a>), "Sometimes a show of force can really
clarify things." His green light for Sharon destroyed eight years of
fitful progress toward resolving the most intractable conflict in the
Middle East. He reacted to 9/11 the same, only with more vigor and
ambition, going after Iraq as well as Afghanistan, and threatening
wars against Iran and North Korea. Then there was his encouragement
of Israel's brutal 2006 carpet-bombing of Lebanon, an act of war that
his secretary of state memorably described as "the birth-pangs of a
new Middle East."</p></li>

<li><p><a href="http://www.washingtonspectator.org/index.php/BREAKING-VIEWS/mj-rosenberg-time-to-admit-us-policies-cause-terrorism.html">
MJ Rosenberg: Time to Admit US Policies Can Cause Terrorism</a>:
To prevent something you have to have some concept of causation.
The Boston bombings again raise the question of terrorism, but we
are stuck within an officially sanctioned blind spot.</p>
<blockquote><p>
There is one change that the United States could make in response to
the terrorism threat that is never discussed. That is to consider the
part U.S. policies have played in creating and sustaining it.</p>
<p>I understand that we are not supposed to say this, as if discussing
why we are hated justifies the unjustifiable: the targeting of innocent
Americans because of the perceived sins of their government.</p>
<p>But nothing justifies terrorism. Period. That does not mean that
nothing causes it.</p>
<p>Acts of terror do not come at us out of the blue. Nor are they
directed at us, as President George W. Bush famously said, because
the terrorists "hate our freedom." If that was the case, terrorists
would be equally or more inclined to hit countries at least as free
as the U.S., those in northern Europe, for instance.</p>
<p>No, terrorists (in the case of the Boston Marathon bombings Muslim
terrorists) target the U.S. because they perceive us as their enemy.
</p></blockquote>
<p>One reason they perceive us as enemies is that we regard them as
enemies. Nor is this just a matter of opinion: the US has, ever since
FDR met with King Saud in 1945, backed the most repressive regimes in
the Middle East, training and arming their secret police, their armed
forces; we've backed wars, and in a pinch we've jumped in and invaded
countries ourselves; and we've fomented civil wars, creating massively
destructive contagions, such as the Sunni-Shiite divide in Iraq. (For
some of this history, see
<a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175691/">
Tom Engelhardt: Field of Nightmares</a>, on Jeremy Scahill's new book,
<i>Dirty Wars: The World Is a Battlefield</i>.) If we don't like this
"blowback," the place to start is in reconsidering our own actions.</p>
<p>But even if there was no terror blowback, the US record in the Middle
East has been an unmitigated mess. Most often we've backed forces based
on the shabby enemy-of-my-enemy principle: from the Saudi regime to
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar in Afghanistan, we've repeatedly backed the most
extremely reactionary Islamists because they were anti-communist, only
to discover that their anti-communism was part of an anti-western agenda
bound to bite the hand that feeds them. We've backed Saddam Hussein's
war against Iran, then backed Iranian-backed militias against Hussein.
We've backed Israel against everyone, even against our own policies --
we even backed Israel when they attacked and sunk a US Navy ship in
1967. Presumably some arms and oil companies have profited along the
way, but what has the average American gotten out of this incoherency?
Nothing but the task of fighting a series of useless, hopeless wars.</p>
<p>Yet the right-wing still clamors for more -- see the recent
<a href="http://www.kansas.com/2013/04/24/2774776/cal-thomas-enemies-fighting-us.html">
Cal Thomas</a> rant: "How many more Americans must be killed and
wounded before we fight back, not just overseas, but here?" As Mort
Sahl said about someone else, "if he were more perceptive, he'd be
a happy man." Still, Thomas is as incoherent as anyone. He notes
the vast size of America's homeland security force, yet bemoans
their inability to stop two disaffected young men from "shutting
down a major city." Aside from calling for a more bigoted immigration
policy and a fevered, nativist witch hunt mentality, how exactly are
we supposed to "fight back"? And is it even justified in a democracy
to talk about enemies at home? The Tsarnaevs, after all, were US
citizens, Americans, entitled to dissenting opinions. When weren't
enemies, and when they set off those bombs, they didn't become our
enemies -- just criminals.</p></li>

<li><p><a href="http://www.tomdispatch.com/blog/175687/tomgram%3A_engelhardt%2C_the_cathedral_of_the_enemy/">
Tom Engelhardt: The Enemy-Industrial Complex</a>: Or, "How to turn
a world lacking in enemies into the most threatening place in the
universe." Out of alpha order, but this follows up nicely on the
above entry. Consider 9/11 as a "Wizard of Oz" facade:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The U.S., in other words, is probably in less danger from external
enemies than at any moment in the last century. There is no other
imperial power on the planet capable of, or desirous of, taking on
American power directly, including China. It's true that, on September
11, 2001, 19 hijackers with box cutters produced a remarkable,
apocalyptic, and devastating TV show in which almost 3,000 people
died.  When those giant towers in downtown New York collapsed, it
certainly had the look of nuclear disaster (and in those first days,
the media was filled was nuclear-style references), but it wasn't
actually an apocalyptic event.</p>
<p>The enemy was still nearly nonexistent. The act cost bin Laden
only an estimated $400,000-$500,000, though it would lead to a series
of trillion-dollar wars. It was a nightmarish event that had a malign
Wizard of Oz quality to it: a tiny man producing giant effects. It
in no way endangered the state. In fact, it would actually strengthen
many of its powers. It put a hit on the economy, but a passing one.
It was a spectacular and spectacularly gruesome act of terror by a
small, murderous organization then capable of mounting a major
operation somewhere on Earth only once every couple of years. It
was meant to spread fear, but nothing more.</p>
<p>When the towers came down and you could suddenly see to the horizon,
it was still, in historical terms, remarkably enemy-less. And yet 9/11
was experienced here as a Pearl Harbor moment -- a sneak attack by a
terrifying enemy meant to disable the country. The next day, newspaper
headlines were filled with variations on "A Pearl Harbor of the
Twenty-First Century." If it was a repeat of December 7, 1941, however,
it lacked an imperial Japan or any other state to declare war on,
although one of the weakest partial states on the planet, the Taliban's
Afghanistan, would end up filling the bill adequately enough for
Americans.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Engelhardt then tries to put 9/11 into perspective by bringing
up stats for "suicide by gun and death by car" -- numbers which
annually dwarf even the 9/11 death toll. Actually, it would make
more sense to write off 9/11 as a fluke and look at more typical
terrorist tolls. You don't have to look hard. On the same day as
the Boston bombings, a fertilizer plant in West, Texas caught fire
and exploded, killing many more people. This doesn't mean that we
shouldn't pay attention to terrorist threats -- indeed, one reason
we should is that many could be avoided by policy changes that we
should implement anyway; but we should keep them in perspective.
Even the 9/11 death toll was ultimately topped two times over by
the number of US soldiers we sacrificed in post-9/11 wars -- wars
meant to do little more than restore the invincible lustre of US
imperial power, and perhaps blindly punish people only vaguely
related to those who actually planned 9/11.</p>
<blockquote><p>
Without an enemy of commensurate size and threat, so much that was done
in Washington in these years might have been unattainable. The vast
national security building and spending spree -- stretching from the
Virginia suburbs of Washington, where the National Geospatial-Intelligence
Agency erected its new $1.8 billion headquarters, to Bluffdale, Utah,
where the National Security Agency is still constructing a $2 billion,
one-million-square-foot data center for storing the world's intercepted
communications -- would have been unlikely.</p>
<p>Without the fear of an enemy capable of doing anything, money at ever
escalating levels would never have poured into homeland security, or the
Pentagon, or a growing complex of crony corporations associated with our
weaponized safety. The exponential growth of the national security
complex, as well as of the powers of the executive branch when it comes
to national security matters, would have far been less likely.</p>
<p>Without 9/11 and the perpetual "wartime" that followed, along with
the heavily promoted threat of terrorists ready to strike and potentially
capable of wielding biological, chemical, or even nuclear weapons, we
would have no Department of Homeland Security nor the lucrative
mini-homeland-security complex that surrounds it; the 17-outfit U.S.
Intelligence Community with its massive $75 billion official budget
would have been far less impressive; our endless drone wars and the
"drone lobby" that goes with them might never have developed; and the
U.S. military would not have an ever growing secret military, the Joint
Special Operations Command, gestating inside it -- effectively the
president's private army, air force, and navy -- and already conducting
largely secret operations across much of the planet.
</p></blockquote>
<p>So there is a lot of money at stake on convincing you that we have
to fight such unscrupulous enemies. But it also fits a political agenda:
conservatism, as Michael Tomasky explains below, depends on fear to
promote its political agenda.</p></li>

<li><p><a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/04/22/the-conservative-paranoid-mind.html">
Michael Tomasky: The Conservative Paranoid Mind</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>
The common thread through all of this is the conservative need to
instill and maintain a level of fear in the populace. They need to
make gun owners fear that Dianne Feinstein and her SWAT team are
going to come knocking on their doors, or, less amusingly, that
they have to be armed to the teeth for that inevitable day when
the government declares a police state. They need to whip up fear
of immigrants, because unless we do, it's going to be nothing but
terrorists coming through those portals, and for good measure,
because, as Ann Coulter and others have recently said, the proposed
law would create millions of voting Democrats (gee, I wonder why!).</p>
<p>And with regard to terrorism, they need people to live in fear
of the next attack, because fear makes people think about death,
and thinking about death makes people more likely to endorse tough-guy,
law-and-order, Constitution-shredding actions undertaken on their
behalf. This is how we lived under Bush and Cheney for years. This
fear is basically what enabled the Iraq War to take place. Public
opinion didn't support that war at first. But once they got the
public afraid with all that false talk of mushroom clouds, the
needle zoomed past 50 percent, and it was bombs away.</p>
<p>Conservatism, I fear (so to speak), can never be cleansed of
this need to instill fear. Whether it's of black people or of
street thugs or of immigrants or of terrorists or of jackbooted
government agents, it's how the conservative mind works.
</p></blockquote></li>

<li><p><a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2013/04/24/koch_brothers_and_the_tribune_company_really_rich_guys_might_be_just_what.html">
Matthew Yglesias: The Koch Brothers Might Be Just What Conservative
Journalism Needs</a>: Sometimes smart people can be pretty stupid,
especially when they let their logic run away from reality. The Koch
brothers are rumored to be in the market for the Tribune Company,
which would give them control over the largest newspapers in Los
Angeles and Chicago, among other cities. Yglesias writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Certain niches -- talk radio and cable television -- are very friendly
to a conservative editorial product but others are not. Which is exactly
why what conservative media needs is a couple of extremely rich people
to buy a newspaper company and lose a ton of money building a great
conservative media product.</p>
<p>After all, the big problem with right-leaning media in America isn't
that it doesn't exist. It's that <i>it's terrible</i>. There is a large
audience out there that's so frustrated with the vile MSM that it's happy
to lap up cheaply produced content from Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity,
and you can make lots of money serving that kind of thing up. By contrast,
to build a great media company that's top-to-bottom staffed with
conservatives is going to be very expensive. The possible talent pool
of great reporters is tilted toward liberals. The talent pool of great
photographers and graphic designers is probably even more tilted toward
liberals. Finding the great conservatives out there and hiring them is
going to be relatively costly, and there's no real economic point to
doing so. Is your much worse cost structure going to get you a larger
audience than Rush? No, it won't. It's a bad bet.</p>
<p>But the Kochs have plenty of money. If they want to see it happen,
they can make it happen. And America would be better off for it.
</p></blockquote>
<p>The obvious problem here is that there is no latent pool of "great
conservatives" ready to move into newspaper journalism <i>at any price</i>,
because they simply don't exist. Conservatives in media are hacks, not
because they're lazy but because their message is nothing more than a
crock of lies and distortions. The net effect won't be "a great conservative
media product" -- it will just reduce marginally decent newspapers into
ever-deeper hackdom. And America will be worse off on two counts: one
is that it increase our current trend toward shoddiness in all manner
of work; the other is that it will reinforce the notion that politics
is purely cynical -- a fixed game controlled by the rich (the Kochs a
particularly egregious example).</p>
<p>One cautionary note is that the Kochs have never gotten into a
business to lose money, which makes it unlikely they would jump on
such a losing proposition. On the other hand, they have shown a
deep commitment to undermine democracy, both through their political
spending and through their use of corporate control as a channel
for pushing their political beliefs. Major urban newspapers have a
huge "first mover" advantage -- it's impossible to capitalize new
competition, so they are effectively monopolies, and as such should
be subject to public trust. Allowing them to be taken over by
extremist political ideologues like the Kochs will irreparably
destroy that trust, and America would be worse off for that.</p></li>

</ul>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p>Also, a few links for further study:</p>

<ul>

<li><p><a href="http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2013/01/lead-crime-link-gasoline">
Kevin Drum: America's Real Criminal Element: Lead</a>.</p></li>

<li><p><a href="http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2013/04/15/130415fa_fact_faludi">
Susan Faludi: Death of a Revolutionary</a>: on Shulamith Firestone.</p></li>

<li><p><a href="http://nationalinterest.org/article/israels-fraying-image-8378">
Jacob Heilbrunn: Israel's Fraying Image</a>: No breaking news here;
indeed, this is well behind the learning curve.</p></li>

<li><p><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/global-warmings-terrifying-new-math-20120719">
Bill McKibben: Global Warming's Terrifying New Math</a></p></li>

<li><p><a href="http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/everything-is-rigged-the-biggest-financial-scandal-yet-20130425">
Matt Taibbi: Everything Is Rigged: The Biggest Price-Fixing Scandal Ever</a>:
Explains the Libor scandal.</p></li>

<li><p><a href="http://nationalinterest.org/article/zionisms-colonial-roots-8377?page=show">
Geoffrey Wheatcroft: Zionism's Colonial Roots</a></p></li>

</ul>
        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1969-Over-a-Barrel.html" rel="alternate" title="Over a Barrel" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-04-27T21:28:05Z</issued>
    <created>2013-04-27T21:28:05Z</created>
    <modified>2013-04-27T21:28:05Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1969</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1969</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1969-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Over a Barrel</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>One thing about the gun debate is the lack of specific case examples,
especially for arguments that putting more guns into the hands of "good"
people will limit the amount of gun violence perpetrated by "bad" people.
The contrary argument, that reducing the number of legal guns -- which,
by the way, simplifies the task of enforcing prohibitions against illegal
guns -- reduces the overall amount of gun violence, can be argued with
gross statistics. That argument, by the way, seems convincing, but we
aren't just statistical aggregates. We're individuals, and even if more
guns in general endanger us, it seems at least possible that there are
some cases where a gun could save one's life or thwart a crime. So why
don't "second amendment rights" advocates give us more concrete examples?
(Aside, of course, from the fact that it's a lot easier to spout pieties,
a form of laziness and sloppiness you hear on all sides of virtually
every issue.)</p>

<p>Someone could (and should) do some actual research on shootings: map
out what kinds of confrontations happen -- e.g., home invasion where
perpetrator is shot by home resident (or vice versa, in which case was
resident armed or not?) -- and count them all up. (As I understand it,
the government is prohibited from undewriting any such study, thanks to
the NRA, which seems to fear any actual research into gun use or abuse.)
But not every confrontation has an obvious right and wrong side. For
example, consider the case of
<a href="http://www.kansas.com/2013/04/27/2779906/man-says-shooting-was-last-resort.html">
Dustin Cheever</a>, here in Wichita.</p>

<p>What happened was: Cheever suspected that the son of a neighbor,
Robert Gammon, had stolen a motorcycle. Cheever didn't take his
suspicions to the police. Instead, he and a friend (Steve Grose)
searched for the motorcycle in Gammons' backyard -- they entered
Gammons' property without his permission or knowledge. Gammons
confronted them, pointing a BB pistol (which plausibly appeared to
be a real gun) at them, and threatening them. Cheever, however, was
carrying a real gun. Rather than backing away, he decided that he
needed to defend himself and/or his friend, so he pulled his gun,
shot, and killed Gammons. Cheever is currently being tried for
second degree murder, which seems about right.</p>

<p>Had Cheever pulled his gun and Gammons killed him, Gammons would
have been in a stronger legal position. He was, after all, at home,
whereas Cheever and Grose were trespassing. Gammons misjudged twice
that his gun would protect him: first, as is so often the case, the
gunfight was determined not by right or wrong, good guy or bad guy,
but by who was quicker with more deadly aim (a fact which, by the
way, tends to favor the more experienced bad guys); but second, had
he not brandished the gun, had he instead just threatened to call
the police, Cheever would have had no excuse to defend himself with
his gun, and most likely the pair would have just left.</p>

<p>That Gammons' gun was actually a non-lethal BB pistol is pretty
much irrelevant here: it looked like a real gun and was given extra
credibility by Gammons' threats to kill with it, plus Cheever had
no reason to doubt that Gammons could have owned a real gun, since
guns are pretty much the norm here in Wichita. Also, Cheever may
well have belatedly understood that Kansas's Stand Your Ground law
gave Gammons a legal excuse to shoot first -- had Gammons realized
that Cheever was in fact armed (something he might reasonably have
suspected). It is often argued that the expectation that the other
person is armed leads to more moderate behavior -- that seems to
be a big part of the argument that all "good guys" should carry
guns -- in this case such expectations pretty clearly escalated the
conflict.</p>

<p>So this case, at least, doesn't provide much support for the notion
that we are better off with more guns: one gun owner, attempting to
defend his property from trespass, is dead; another, intent on taking
the law into his own hand in searching for his stolen property, faces
second degree murder charges. Neither of those outcomes would have
happened had either (much less both) parties been unarmed, nor would
they have happened had either (again much less both) turned to the
police to settle their dispute.</p>

<p>There may be other gun confrontations where it's easier to tell
who is "good" or "bad," where it's clearer who's right and wrong,
but I suspect this sort of mess is more common. Moreover, it's more
reflective of the mentality of people who think guns are an answer
for their problems dealing with other people: they overestimate the
value and grossly underestimate the risks; and they almost never
have the skills and judgment they'd need to make the gun work for
them, and often lack the self-awareness to realize when they're
getting into trouble. Indeed, the police, who are trained both in
the law and the proper use of guns, often screw it up. Why would
a random individual expect to do better?</p>

<p>There are simple solutions here, but not practicable ones. The
statistics are clear, but no one wants to be a statistic. As long
as people think they need guns for self-protection, it's awfully
hard to take them away. Moreover, it's hard to say "trust in the
police" when the police aren't all that trustworthy, nor can one
say "have faith in our system of justice" when that system is far
from just. Those are, I'm tempted to argue, bigger and more urgent
problems than guns. On the other hand, so many of the reasons that
people give for insisting on arming themselves are so patently
false you have to argue with them just to attempt to open up a
space for public sanity.</p>

<p>No such argument is more ridiculous than the one that you need
guns to protect yourself from the government -- although the one
that the government needs guns to protect itself from you is every
bit as specious, not to mention the one -- which costs us about a
trillion dollars a year -- that the government needs armies and
navies and air forces to protect us from foreigners. War doesn't
protect us from war: war is war. Guns don't protect us from gun
violence: aside from a few museum pieces, they create gun violence.</p>

        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1968-Rhapsody-Streamnotes-April-2013.html" rel="alternate" title="Rhapsody Streamnotes (April 2013)" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-04-26T22:44:50Z</issued>
    <created>2013-04-26T22:44:50Z</created>
    <modified>2013-04-26T22:44:50Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1968</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1968</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1968-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Rhapsody Streamnotes (April 2013)</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Had promised to post this today, so be it. But I was tempted to slip in
something else in its stead. First thing I saw in the paper this morning
was a piece on Obama (and Clinton and Carter and the old man, whose face
is on a T-shirt I have captioned something like "I wish I had pulled out")
saying nice things about the worst president in US history on the occasion
of the opening of a library built by the taxpayers in his name. There are
lots of reasons to be unhappy with Obama these days, but none galls me
more than his utter failure to expound on the incalculable damage that
the presidency of George W. Bush did to this country. By not doing so, he
let the nation forget, and thereby learn nothing. Indeed, within two years
the Republican Party not only recovered as a political force, it did so
under much more extremist leadership. And also by not speaking up he tacitly
accepted the legacy Bush left as a new norm: hence it became his recession,
his deficits, his bloody wars.</p>

<p>Then when I got on the net, I discovered that George Jones died. That
would have been worth a post, too -- for now, let me just refer you to my
<a href="/ocston/arch/rs/jones,george.php">
Rolling Stone CD Guide</a> piece on him. My mother was a huge fan of his,
so his music became a bonding point -- going as far back as when there
weren't many such points. The day Jones wrecked his SUV, I flew home to
Wichita, got in real late, and let myself into her house. She had been
sleeping but got up to greet me, and all she could talk about was Jones.
She was crying, slobbering; I could hardly understand a word, and for
the first time wondered whether she was losing her mind. Turned out,
she had forgot to put her teeth in. Always wished we could have taken
her to see Jones, but by the time we did get a chance to see him, she
had passed, and he was barely able to sing -- very disappointing show.</p>

<p>Nothing much to say about the following streamnotes. I've been
checking out what I could, not much taken by recent recommendations
by Christgau and Tatum (although the African stuff has mostly kept
out of reach), doubtful that they will approve of my minor finds.
So feeling alone out here. And cranky. Damn cranky.</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p>These are short notes/reviews based on streaming records from
Rhapsody. They are snap judgments based on one or two plays,
accumulated since my last post along these lines, back on
March 28. Past reviews and more information are available
<a href="/ocston/arch/rhap/">here</a> (3274 records).</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<table align="right" style="margin-left: 6px">
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/djkoze-amygdala.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/dunbar-woo.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/earle-low.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/knife-shaking.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/miller-nomorphine.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/yeahyeahyeahs-mosquito.jpg"></td></tr>
</table>

<p><b>Actress: <i>R.I.P.</i></b> (2012, Honest Jon's): Darren
Cunningham has a new EP I can't find, but last year's album has
belatedly appeared. Most songs are built from simple patterns
with minor oddities, adding up in interesting ways.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Jello Biafra and the Guantanamo School of Medicine: <i>White
People and the Damage Done</i></b> (2013, Alternative Tentacles):
Eric Boucher, ex-Dead Kennedys, has nine "spoken word" albums
(1987-2006), formed this band in 2009 to record <i>The Audacity of
Hype</i>. Guitar heavy, not pop-punk but maybe power-punk, lyrics
political though I'm not sure how useful.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>James Blake: <i>Overgrown</i></b> (2013, Polydor): Considered
electronica for his dewy electroglop, but nothing conveys bathos like
the juvenile human voice -- as AMG put it, "the faintest hints of Chet
Baker's springtime loneliness buried in Blake's mumbling blue-eyed
R&amp;B vocals." Of course, he's less cracked than Baker, and more
authentically bereft. What a sad world he portends.
<b>B</b></p>

<p><b>Bombino: <i>Nomad</i></b> (2013, Nonesuch): Tuareg guitar hero,
goes with an American producer this time, who decides to crank up the
guitar (and bass and drums) -- not a bad idea, but a bit limiting.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Charli XCX: <i>True Romance</i></b> (2013, Iamsound): British
electro-diva Charlotte Aitchison, age 20, first album (not counting
a promo, EPs, and a couple mixtapes). Voice is so-so and her raps
barely flow, but the multi-producer synth pop buoys her, at least
until the tedious "How Can I."
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Chicha Libre: <i>Cuatro Tigres</i></b> (2013, Barbès, EP):
Brooklyn group built around the "psychedelic cumbias from Peru"
that the label first anthologized on <i>The Roots of Chicha</i>
(2007). After two albums, a four track, 14:48, EP, starting with
a cover of the Clash's "The Guns of Brixton" -- a signifier that
they are of our world, as is their take on the <i>Simpsons</i>
theme music, but "Rica Chicha" suggests a more interesting one.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Eric Church: <i>Caught in the Act: Live</i></b> (2011 [2013],
EMI Nashville): Country singer-songwriter with three pretty good and
pretty popular records under his belt, consolidates them into one
75-minute set here -- the sound cranked up to fill his arena and to
keep the crowd psyched. Recorded with a lot of fan cheer, annoying
at first, eventually settling into something akin to groove wear.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Chvrches: <i>Recover</i></b> (2013, Glassnote, EP): Glassgow
electropop group with singer Lauren Mayberry and two keyb players,
tiptoes into the pop arena with an EP, 5 cuts, 21:23, but actually
the two longest cuts are remixes of the title cut -- stretches out
the undoubted pleasure, but impresses me less.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>DJ Koze: <i>Amygdala</i></b> (2013, Pampa): Stefan Kozalla,
from Hamburg, Germany, has a handful of albums since 2000, titles
like <i>Music Is Okay</i>, <i>All People Is My Friends</i>, and
<i>Wo Die Rammelwolle Fliegt</i>. His beats are slight but deeper
into the album become hypnotic. The vocals, some in German, are
awkward, but ultimately superfluous.
<b>A-</b></p>

<p><b>Maxmillion Dunbar: <i>House of Woo</i></b> (2013, RVNG Intl.):
"Left-field house" from Andrew Field-Pickering, has a previous album
and the usual pile of short forms and DJ mixes, dishes up sparkling
synth sounds that hold your interest even when he wanders from the
beat.
<b>A-</b></p>

<p><b>Steve Earle &amp; the Dukes (&amp; Duchesses): <i>The Low
Highway</i></b> (2013, New West): Not sure that hanging around the
set of <i>Treme</i> did him much good -- his Cajun comes up a bit
shy -- but "That All You Got?" may wind up the most memorable of
Katrina songs, and two co-credits with Lucia Micarelli -- Eleanor
Whitmore plays the fiddle -- wrap up a tidy package in the midst
of an otherwise down-and-out album. He also treads ominously with
a loner threatening to burn WalMart down, and other characters are
no less sullen, but that's where he finds his purpose.
<b>A-</b></p>

<p><b>Jonny Fritz: <i>Dad Country</i></b> (2013, ATO): Formerly known
as Jonny Corndawg, whose 2011 album <i>Down on the Bikini Line</i>
tried to be funnier, all grown up and sober now, with a dozen songs
I don't recall clearly enough, except that I'm pretty sure they don't
suck.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Ghostface Killah/Adrian Younge: <i>Twelve Reasons to Die</i></b>
(2013, Relativity/Soul Temple): Cover of this mock soundtrack reads
"Adrian Younge Presents . . . Starring Ghostface Killah," but I figure
go with the big type first. It's another hoary gangster chronicle,
replete with 1970s spaghetti western musical effects, so hackneyed
it's almost funny, something that could grow on you if you never took
it seriously.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Greyboy Allstars: <i>Inland Emperor</i></b> (2013, Knowledge
Room): Started out in the mid-1990s during the brief acid jazz boom
with DJ Greyboy the organizing force, and while I wouldn't call them
stars, at least I've heard of saxophonist Karl Denson and organist
Robert Walter. The instrumental funk is not without interest (e.g.,
"Trashtruck"), but the vocals are.
<b>B</b></p>

<p><b>The Knife: <i>Shaking the Habitual</i></b> (2013, Mute, 2CD):
Swedish electropop duo, Olof Dreijer and sister-singer Karin Dreijer
Andersson (aka Fever Ray). Some confusion: there's a 77:18 single
disc version and a 96:19 double, but Rhapsody's comes in at 86:16.
Several terrific cuts here, at least when they stay upbeat and
oblique, with the slow ones slipping back into the ordinary. Could
be that all versions are just a hair too long.
<b>A-</b></p>

<p><b>The Knife: <i>Silent Shout</i></b> (2006, Rabid/Mute): The
Swedish siblings' second, and probably best-regarded, record: the
beats seem a bit better crafted and less exciting, the songs a bit
more consistently crafted -- seems to be their level.
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>Lapalux: <i>Nostalchic</i></b> (2013, Brainfeeder): Stuart
Howard, English but attached to Flying Lotus, which shares a lot
of the choppy pastiche, but is better at it.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Lil Wayne: <i>I Am Not a Human Being II</i></b> (2013, Cash
Money): "I would sing about my dick/but that'd be a long story."
Instead, perhaps inspired by his dick, he focuses on pussy.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Major Lazer: <i>Free the Universe</i></b> (2013, Secretly
Canadian): Reggae/dancehall/ragga project by Diplo (Wes Pentz) and
Switch (Dave Taylor), a bit removed from Jamaica but so is everything
since roots reggae got lost in the 1980s. Third album, their most
natural and most expansive, and not just because they get help on
"Bubble Butt."
<b>B+(***)</b></p>

<p><b>The Men: <i>New Moon</i></b> (2013, Sacred Bones): Brooklyn
post-whatever band, have started to mix up the punkish formula with
countryish ballads and hooks wherever they can find them, but haven't
found much, and are better off when they revert.
<b>B</b></p>

<p><b>Allison Miller's Boom Tic Boom: <i>No Morphine No Lillies</i></b>
(2013, Foxhaven/Royal Potato Family): Drummer, third album, her second
called <i>Boom Tic Boom</i> a smashing piano trio with Myra Melford and
Todd Sickafoose plus "guest" violinist Jenny Scheinman. Some "second
system complex" here as Scheinman becomes a regular, giving the group
two stars to try to keep in sync, and a new batch of guests, including
a Rachel Friedman vocal, Erik Friedlander cello, and a pair of trumpets.
Too much to sort out quickly, but the pianist is brilliant as ever, and
the closer with the trumpets is deliriously over the top.
<b>A-</b></p>

<p><b>Willie Nelson and Family: <i>Let's Face the Music and Dance</i></b>
(2013, Legacy): He turns 80 this year, taking it easy by doing what he's
done pretty much ever since Nashville, and he's put as little effort into
this as he's ever done: just a bunch of semi-standards done Family style --
less likely to tax his voice, which is still remarkably prime at a time
when peers like Haggard and Jones are shot to shit. Easy suits him.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>OneRepublic: <i>Native</i></b> (2013, Interscope): Arena rock
band from Colorado Springs, not something we really need, but their
avalanche of synths is tuneful more often than not, and I don't
detect any of the ickiness you get with bands like Journey. Sample
shallow sentiment: "And if we only die once I wanna die with you."
<b>B</b></p>

<p><b>Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark: <i>English Electric</i></b>
(2013, Relativity): New wave synth group from 1980, when their first
two albums were fresh and danceable despite the fact that all they
could do were variations on their formula -- "Enola Gay" remains the
archetype. Having nothing better to do, they regrouped after a 12
year hiatus in 2008. This is pleasant filler until "Helen of Troy"
earns a spot on their best-of, then this turns into more interesting
filler.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Brad Paisley: <i>Wheelhouse</i></b> (2013, Arista Nashville):
What do you do about a guy who'd really like to be smarter, kinder,
and more decent than his cohort, but who frets that it may cost him
sales and huzzahs down at the local redneck honky tonk? Especially
since it probably already has, although more for the way he keeps
picking at his self-inflicted scabs than his lack of backbone. Has
anyone ever written a lazier, wobblier-kneed anthem than "Southern
Comfort Zone"? ("Accidental Racist"? Despite its platitudes, lazy
as they are, not an anthem.) Oh, and by the way, the real lesson of
Sherman's march through Georgia isn't that Dixie got wronged. It's
what the man said: "War is hell."
<b>B</b></p>

<p><b>Palma Violets: <i>180</i></b> (2013, Rough Trade): British
group debut, punk-related, black-and-white cover suggesting their
basic approach, but a little fancier, especially with the organ --
more Jam than Ramones.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Paramore: <i>Paramore</i></b> (2013, Fueled by Ramen): Fifth
album from a band formed in Tennessee, fronted by singer-songwriter
Hayley Williams, the eponymous album a way of doubling down after
two other band founders split. Big voice, big beat, grand gestures,
a bit of pop sheen, all of which leaves me cold -- unlike the 0:52
"I'm Not Angry Anymore," which suggests a different path.
<b>B</b></p>

<p><b>Pennybirdrabbit: <i>Safer</i></b> (2013, Big Beat, EP): Second
EP, four songs, 14:13. The hype, aside from citing her appearance on
a Skrillex joint, dwells on how cute she is, but her electronica is
pretty tasteful, the vocals forthright, and the songs smarter than
you had any reason to expect.
<b>B+(**)</b> [sc]</p>

<p><b>Phosphorescent: <i>Muchacho</i></b> (2013, Dead Oceans): Group
alias for Matthew Houck, singer-songwriter based in Athens, GA. Did
a Willie Nelson tribute two albums back, but could also do one for
Bon Iver, not that he should -- his own songs are better.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Salva: <i>Odd Furniture</i></b> (2013, Friends of Friends, EP):
Paul Salva, from LA. Five cuts, 20:04, hard beats and emphatic repetition
remind some of Skrillex, not much of a recommendation in my book.
<b>B</b>
[<a href="http://fofmusic.bandcamp.com/album/odd-furniture-ep">bc</a>]</p>

<p><b>Shlohmo: <i>Laid Out</i></b> (2013, Friends of Friends, EP):
Henry Laufer, from Los Angeles, has a couple albums and a handful of
EPs, this one running 5 cuts, 26:52. Even the one with the annoying
vocal-like samples has a structure that makes use of them; better
still when the sounds have their own appeal.
<b>B+(**)</b>
[<a href="http://fofmusic.bandcamp.com/album/laid-out-ep">bc</a>]</p>

<p><b>Skrillex: <i>Leaving</i></b> (2013, Owsla, EP): Showboat techno,
at least that's what I concluded after not being able to stomach his
commercial breakthrough, <i>Bangarang</i>, although I rather liked his
earlier, still extravagant, <i>Scary Monsters and Nice Sprites</i>. He
files everything in his catalog as EP, but this one really is -- 3
songs, 12:41 (<i>Bangarang</i> ran 29:56, and three remixes pushed
<i>Scary Monsters</i> even longer). First two bang his gong, although
less irritating than before; title track is measured and pleasant.
<b>B+(*)</b> [dl]</p>

<p><b>William Tyler: <i>Impossible Truth</i></b> (2013, Merge): Solo
guitarist, in the mode of John Fahey with all the rich harmonic reverb
but less of a sense that he's an authentic primitive. Rumbles a bit
early on, then sweetens up: "The World Set Free" is more than a good
idea.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Kurt Vile: <i>Wakin on a Pretty Daze</i></b> (2013, Matador):
Singer-songwriter from Philadelphia, name not an alias, which helps
explain why he is blander -- less witty and less menacing -- than
you would expect. He's also lost whatever lo-fi gestalt he started
with, winding up here with a rather nice guitar groove album
regardless of how the songs break.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Charles Walker &amp; the Dynamites: <i>Love Is Only Everything</i></b>
(2013, Gemco): Veteran blues shouter fronting a Motown-tinged r&amp;b
group: hard to see what could go wrong there, but now you can construct
a catalog of annoying tics, none redeemed by a hopelessly catchy hook.
<b>B-</b></p>

<p><b>Will.i.am: <i>#Willpower</i></b> (2013, Interscope): Black Eyed
Peas majordomo, has produce some of the catchiest arena funk of the
last decade but even when he steps up front he remains a background
persona -- perhaps he doesn't have much else. This has been predictably
panned, and indeed the rhymes are lazy and the "let's get dumb" party
philosophy shallow but "Ghetto Ghetto" isn't shallow -- just a little
tongue-in-cheek with the kiddie chorus.
<b>B+(*)</b></p>

<p><b>Wire: <i>Change Becomes Us</i></b> (2013, Pink Flag): More than
any other 1970s group, the one that engineered the transition from punk
to new wave, something they've immortalized in their guitar tunings and
bass crunch -- cf. "Eels Sang," a throwback for more than its brevity,
a rule "&amp; Much Besides" fruitfully sets aside; other tracks less so.
<b>B+(**)</b></p>

<p><b>Yeah Yeah Yeahs: <i>Mosquito</i></b> (2013, Interscope): Despite
all the vampire hoopla of the last decade, the real blood-sucking killer
is the lowly mosquito, and their title song plays it up for all the
horror you should feel. Half of the songs are equally remarkable --
"Sacrilege" sure is, "These Paths" burbles ominously, "Area 52"
destroys the earth, and the ballad helps with the healing.
<b>A-</b></p>

        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1967-A-Downloaders-Diary-29-April-2013.html" rel="alternate" title="A Downloader's Diary (29): April 2013" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-04-24T20:46:21Z</issued>
    <created>2013-04-24T20:46:21Z</created>
    <modified>2013-04-25T06:16:49Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1967</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1967</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1967-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">A Downloader's Diary (29): April 2013</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<h4>by Michael Tatum</h4>

<p>I'm delighted by the symmetry of touting two pick hits from Mali
featuring the <i>ngoni</i> (I'll explain in a minute), both
distributed by German imprint Out Here.  Unfortunately for me -- and,
I'm afraid, for you -- Rokia Traoré's CD should have been re-issued
stateside by Nonesuch, who as of this writing have pushed back the
release date indefinitely. I have no idea if it's a licensing issue,
but nevertheless, enough publications have run reviews on the record
that I'm justifying its inclusion this month. If need be, do yourself
a favor and hunt for a good price on the import -- or at least bug WEA
to put it back on their release schedule. Good rock and roll is so
hard to find these days.</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<table align=right style="margin-left: 6px">
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/dieufdieul-aw.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/kouyate-jama.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/nash-girl.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/supermazembe-45vol1.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/paisley-wheelhouse.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/rilokiley-rkives.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/traore-beautiful.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/wire-change.jpg"></td></tr>
<!--<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/-.jpg"></td></tr>-->
</table>

<p><b>Dieuf-Dieul de Thiès: <i>Aw Sa Yone Vol. 1</i> (Teranga Beat)</b>
Outshone in their time by a certain nonpareil Dakar outfit, these
competitors from nearby Thiès couldn't garner the necessary financial
backing to commit these 1982 sessions to cassette, let alone the more
expensive vinyl. So even if thirty plus years later the resulting CD
is prone to the occasional channel drop out, be thankful Baobab
producer Moussa Diallo had the foresight to record them live at the
Sangomar Night Club gratis when no else would. Although their name
translates to "collective good deeds undertaken in hopes of future
profit," one gathers from the testimonials from bandleader/guitarist
Pape Seck and singer Gora Mbaye -- both of whom take pains to remind
us that they've had no recompense from this project -- this
short-lived aggregation was a labor of love that, despite its failure
to live up to its nominal promise, has been unmatched musically or
spiritually for either man before or since. Mbalax fans will find
much to appreciate in Bassirou Sarr's dynamic tenor, but what really
distinguishes this band -- and keeps their spellbinding jams going for
an average of nine minutes each -- are insinuating, serpentine rhythms
that rumble rather than rock, and two wild card saxophonists whose
expansive, incisive solos actually go somewhere. In short, for those
who covet the idea of garage rock, but are more persuaded by the kind
of scrappy upstarts who are too poor to own a car -- let alone a
garage. <b>A&#150;</b></p>

<p><b>Bassekou Kouyate &amp; Ngoni Ba: <i>Jama Ko</i> (Out Here)</b>
Showcasing passionate vocal performances not only from Kouyate himself
but also lifemate Amy Sacko, Khaira Arby, Kassé-Mady Diabaté, and my
favorite, leather-larynxed Zoumana Teretayou, you might be led into
believing this is a singer's album. Of course, it is -- inasmuch as so
many Malian records are -- but it owes its majesty and power mainly to
the <i>ngoni</i>, a lowly stringed-instrument fashioned from wood or
calabash and covered by a layer of dried, stretched animal skin: in
other words, if one had a hankering to "shred one's ax," no match for
a Fender Strat. In theory. But because its string placement makes it
ideal for executing dazzling, pirouetting runs, and because this is
arranged for not one but four players shadowboxing around each other,
this is a guitar workout like few others, and with the help of
amplification, effects pedals, and two percussionists who must have at
least four hands each, their desert protest blues is powerful rock and
roll indeed. Recorded with careful thought to space by Arcade Fire
hand Howard Bilerman, Kouyate's leads are as lightning-quick as you'd
expect, but he's equally deft at string-bending and one-note freakouts
reminiscent of Santana or the Doors, resulting in an album with no
dead spots, right down to the Howlin' Wolf tribute and the
sprint-to-the-finish-line named after Kouyate's son. And the manic
climax to "Ne Me Fatigue Pas" says more about doom and uncertainty
about Mali's recent political coup than mere words ever could.
<b>A</b></p>

<p><b>Kate Nash: <i>Girl Talk [Deluxe Edition]</i> (Ingrooves)</b>
Nash's riot grrrl move makes a lot more sense when you work your way
back through her discography. Compared initially to Lily Allen
because each masked her privileged upbringing by cultivating a Mockney
accent and a potty mouth after her egalitarian parents sent her to
public school, one could argue the British record buying public
cottoned to them because although they swore like Liverpudlian
sailors, they remained "proper birds" about it. Even so, Allen
herself would never have countenanced the tart homemade production of
Nash's <i>Made of Bricks</i> and <i>My Best Friend Is You</i>, nor
would Allen's bright, fluttery soprano have been capable of tackling
Nash's new material -- hints of the nasal yowl the latter employs here
have been hinted at in her darker timbre all along.  And most
crucially, many of Nash's songs, beginning with the anti-bullying
"Dickhead" on the debut, address relationships with women: platonic of
course (the phrase "best friend" reoccurs in song after song),
romantic up in the air, and either way for you and <i>The Daily
Mirror</i> to puzzle out. So while this first sounds like a mess,
immersion reveals itself to be both a logical progression and a good
way to stick it to the British pop music journalists who would turn
their noses at the prospect of putting a "lightweight" on the cover of
<i>Mojo</i>. And though the domestic release ends with a whimper --
the fey "You're So Cool, I'm So Freaky," followed by a lullaby that
rubs its mawkish orchestral arrangement in old fans' faces -- the
import deluxe concludes with three good-to-great tracks, including the
self-explanatory "I'm a Feminist, You're Still a Whore," preceded by
an ode to Pussy Riot that speaks feminism's universal language ("Meow,
meow, meow, meow"). And note how Nash connects to her Russian
compatriots: "They're the kinda girls that you'd be friends with/Cause
they look cool and they give a shit/About the kind of things you give
a shit about." Sisters gotta stick together.  Brothers, take
notice. <b>A&#150;</b></p>

<p><b>Orchestra Super Mazembe: <i>Mazembe @ 45rpm, Vol.1</i> (Sterns
Africa)</b> Although identified with Nairobi benga -- their biggest
hit, the lovely "Shauri Yako," appears on the magnificent 1991
Earthworks compilation <i>Guitar Paradise of East Africa</i>, though
not here -- the Super Earth Shakers are actually carpetbaggers who
came up in the 70s from the Congo, less to flee Mobutu's kleptocracy
(one could hardly argue Daniel arap Moi's vile police state as an
improvement) but because Kenya promised bigger money. Their basic
approach, covering both sides of an affordable, ten-shilling, 45 rpm
single, will be familiar to benga/soukous/what-have-you fans:
luminescent verses/choruses, followed by a brief caesura, after which
the music bursts into a breakneck reverie in which voices and guitar
bounce off each other so ebulliently you'll be thankful compiler Doug
Paterson, as with the great 2010 D.O. Misiani compilation he also
curated, painstakingly fuses both sides together (besides, who wants
to get up and turn over a record while he's dancing?). Unlike most
Afropop combos, there is no prime mover here: the band had as much a
revolving door policy as the Drifters or Parliament-Funkadelic -- the
liner notes list twenty members, plus nine confederates of indistinct
involvement. And they sung the majority of their material in their
native Lingala, a language denizens of their adopted country
understand only slightly more than you and I. So with beauty, beats,
and Atia Jo's buoyant bass their only non-variables, why do you
suppose sold these records like hotcakes? Clues can be found in the
included pics, one displaying the band goofing around in hardhats and
yellow slickers (their name also translates to "construction
workers"), another a group shot in which they lightheartedly mug for
the camera.  Eager to please any which way, they're almost a little
too accommodating -- this isn't nearly as lively, resourceful, or
magical as <i>Guitar Paradise of East Africa</i>, which I guess is my
way of saying eleven bands are better than one. Or maybe I mean one
band is better than none -- the band's lack of cohesive identity is a
problem. Beauty against adversity may be Africa's gift to the world,
but that's no excuse to make pleasure feel like business.
<b>A&#150;</b></p>

<p><b>Brad Paisley: <i>Wheelhouse</i> (Arista Nashville)</b>
Musically, Paisley's crazed strategy here reminds me of long-dismissed
grunge reprobate Art Alexaxis: begin with a genre record, flirt with
crossover, scurry to an apology, then heroically stage-dive into a
full-fledged, gonzo sellout. The difference is that because he
theoretically comes from right field, Paisley risks far more, not just
by nodding three times to "rap" (the best by Charlie Daniels, who
makes me wonder if "The Devil Went Down to Georgia" was the antebellum
"The Breaks"), but with samples, my favorite from a Roger Miller song
I'm willing to bet that before this no one who actually own a Pro
Tools setup has actually heard. Yet the knee-jerk conservatism of the
lyrics shows how much Paisley is hedging his bets. It's one thing to
remind red-staters that not everyone owns a gun, another to muse
affectionately about "Those Crazy Christians" (Jeff Foxworthy: "If you
bless a casserole or pray before a football game, you might be a
Christian"). And while I love the gleeful abusive boyfriend revenge
fantasy "Karate," songs like that have been staples of the genre long
before Garth Brooks. But consider "Runaway Train," where Paisley
opines, "When I was a young'un, my momma used to pray/That I'd find me
a Christian girl and settle down someday," without revealing what kind
of strong-willed woman took that archetype's place, or "The Mona
Lisa," who regardless of her status as a <i>ne plus ultra</i> is seen,
not heard, or the beer-commercial plots of "Harvey Bodine" and "Death
of a Single Man." And while I'd point out that the Bob Doles of the
world don't fear Bill Cosby or Ben Carson as much as they do brothers
in gold chains and do-rags, you don't have to be Dolores Kearnes
Goodwin to doubt the veracity of LL Cool J's closing benediction to
Robert E. Lee (!!) and Abraham Lincoln in "Accidental Racist." Next
time, Paisley should ring up Chuck D. But somehow I doubt Chuck's
gonna return to the calls of someone who spends two "sensitive" verses
rationalizing his reasons for proudly displaying the Confederate flag
on a T-shirt. <b>B+</b></p>

<p><b>Rilo Kiley: <i>Rkives</i> (Little Record Company)</b>
Completists complain -- and don't they always? -- why not include the
juvenilia from their obscure first EP? Why not "Big Break" (the
desultory b-side to "The Moneymaker")? Or the acoustic "Somebody
Else's Clothes" (which appears only on the <i>Live at Fingerprints</i>
EP) or "Xmas Cake," their bummed-out contribution to Nettwerk's
<i>Maybe This Christmas Too?</i> Diligent Youtube research reveals
however that these sixteen rarities plus one hidden novelty comprise
the cream. Sure, there's Blake Sennett's mealy-mouthed demo "Rest of
My Life," as well his petulant title-says-it-all "Well, You Left,"
which lies stillborn until Jenny Lewis adds a backing vocal to a
disingenuously joyous coda. Yet although it took me several spins to
suss it out -- the band would never have left a potential radio hit on
the cutting room floor -- this is the rare odds and sods deal
that can stand with the original records, and with three of the
stragglers from 2004's heartfelt <i>More Adventurous</i> and seven
more from 2007's slicker <i>Under the Blacklight</i>, what it offers
in sonic variety makes up for what it lacks in thematic heft. Jenny is
the star -- that goes without saying. But it never before occurred to
me how much Sennett brought to the table until I
heard how much muscle and imagination he put even into Lewis'
second-stringers -- and had the benefit of Lewis' slightly more
perfunctory solo efforts with Johnathan Rice and the Watson Twins for
comparison. Great singer-songwriters are one thing. Great bands are
another. <b>A</b></p>

<p><b>Rokia Traoré: <i>Beautiful Africa</i> (Out Here)</b> You won't
be disappointed if you backtrack through this Malian
singer-songwriter-guitarist's four previous albums, but as a whole
they're slightly static: graceful to be sure, but also a tad too
subtle, understated, and as deliberate as a piano recital, thus
inaccessible to "world music" holdouts who thinks Oumou Sangare's
records "all sound the same." This record poses no such hurdles.
Beginning with the shotgun entrance of trap drum dynamo Sebastian
Rochford, this electrifying set announces itself as nothing less than
a <i>rock</i> record -- if you're wondering what might have inspired
PJ Harvey confidante John Parish to sign on as producer, Traoré's
crunchy guitar riffs, off-kilter time signatures, and awe-inspiring
vocal gymnastics (from trilling coo to banshee wail to playful purr)
must feel like familiar territory. And with the exception of the
regretful "Mélancolie" this doesn't let up, including the two in
English, a tough title anthem and a gorgeous song of praise for women.
Not that you should let the ones in French and Bamako scare you off --
the killer girl-group backing vocals make the <i>parlez vous</i> ring
out like doo wah diddy, hey-ya, hey-ya. <b>A</b></p>

<p><b>Wire: <i>Change Becomes Us</i> (Pink Flag)</b> Some bands evolve
out of necessity; some evolve out of boredom. These shrewd
shell-gamers evolve as to whatever fits their currents needs. If new
wave bleaches punk, we'll bleach it even further by hiring Depeche
Mode's producer. If our drummer quits, we'll lean harder on the drum
machines. When our drummer returns, we'll get back to basics. And when
guitarist Bruce Gilbert retires, we'll recycle and renew fragments
from 1981's chaotic <i>Document and Eyewitness</i> like we were the
Rolling Stones rolling from <i>Some Girls</i> to <i>Emotional
Rescue</i> to <i>Tattoo You</i>, though letting thirty years pass by
rather than three, well that's just shrewd shell-gamers for you.
Their more obscure lyrics still don't signify without memorable melody
-- the breakdown in communication theme may finally justify Graham
Lewis' penchant for acronymic gobbledygook on "Re-invent Your Second
Wheel," but it's still gobbledygook (and no, it's not code, Graham --
I applied a substitution cipher). But especially on the first half,
catchier and more propulsive than their similarly-textured 2011 <i>Red
Barked Tree</i>, their blast-chilled art punk makes the most out of
lines like "How I adore your island/You're the one who should be
spared," and a pile-driving anti-anthem that makes the change promised
in their album title sound like a threat. And in the embittered
opener, Colin Newman re-imagines "Reuters" from the point of view of
an "ally in exile": "He breaks down in this theatre, but hopes not
under these lights/Specifically those which gain strategic insights/By
the best of good fortune, he had provisions in store/He doubles, then
trebles the locks on his door." <b>B+</b></p>

<h3>Honorable Mentions</h3>

<p><b>Suede: <i>Bloodsports</i> (Suede Ltd.)</b> Okay I'm swayed, but
the word "aniseed" appears in back-to-back songs, and "Like a cause
without a martyr/Like an effigy of balsa/Like a hairline crack in a
radiator/Leaking life" is from one of the <i>good</i> ones
("Barriers," "It Starts and Ends With You") <b>***</b></p>

<p><b>Atoms for Peace: <i>Amok</i> (XL)</b> Joey Waronker isn't my
idea of an Afrobeat drum titan any more than Phil Selway, but for
chilly DOR he'll do ("Default," "Reverse Running") <b>***</b></p>

<p><b>Telekinesis: <i>Dormarion</i> (Merge)</b> The question isn't
<i>can</i> you be a one man band, but <i>should</i> you? ("Power
Lines," "Dark to Light") <b>**</b></p>

<p><b><i>The Rough Guide to Acoustic Africa</i> (World Music
Network)</b> In which even songs I liked in other contexts are
subsumed by a concept that could use its own change of pace (Syran
Mbenza &amp; Ensemble Rumba Kongo, "Mbanda Nasali Nini? (Madeleine),"
Shiyani Ngcobo, "Yekanini") <b>**</b></p>

<p><b>Justin Timberlake: <i>The 20/20 Experience</i> (RCA)</b> Maybe
Smokey belabored the corny metaphors too, but he had the good sense
not to stretch them out over an average song length of seven minutes
("Don't Hold the Wall," "Strawberry Bubblegum") <b>*</b></p>
 
 <!--<h3>Choice Cuts</h3>-->
 
<h3>Trash</h3>

<table align=right style="margin-left: 6px">
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/bowie-next.jpg"></td></tr>
<tr><td><img src="/ocston/img/cds/marr-messenger.jpg"></td></tr>
</table>

<p><b>David Bowie: <i>The Next Day</i> (Columbia)</b> I have no idea
what has taken hold in David Bowie's mind and body -- whether it's
psychological, biochemical, or the thought of time waiting in the
wings and speaking senseless things -- but whatever it is, it's
scaring him to death: "Here I am/Not quite dying/My body left to rot
in a hollow tree/Its branches throwing shadows on the gallows for
me/And the next day/And the next/And another." Yet as he grips with
the thought of his own mortality -- for real this time, no
romanticized bullshit -- his Anglophile acolytes pretend, as they have
for the last twenty-five odd years, that this represents a new
dawning, another phase in a many storied career no one will admit has
too many vacancies on the uppermost floors. Both the album title and
the Dadaist appropriation of 1977's <i>Heroes</i> cover imply that
this record is the one that should have surfaced in 1979 rather than
<i>Lodger</i> -- a pretty bold statement, I'd say -- yet nothing here
hits as hard as the first three songs on that underrated record's
b-side. Meanwhile, Tony Visconti's production (another connection to
his lost past) recreates old affects without that fertile period's
air of discovery (the disjointed beat of "Dirty Boys" recalls
"Breaking Glass," the squishy synth-snares of "Love is Lost" evoke
"Sound and Vision"). Only on "The Stars Are Out Tonight" does the
artist completely abjure sad nostalgia (the Potzdamer Platz, the
Nurnberger Strasse) for directness and Visconti's chilly art rock find
a purpose. Read the lyric sheet and you'll find that the celestial
bodies in question have curious names like Birgitte, Jack, Kate, and
Brad, and spend their time aimlessly wandering, never sleeping: "The
dead ones and the living." And, one assumes, those in between. Peace
be with you, David. <b>B</b></p>

<p><b>Johnny Marr: <i>The Messenger</i> (Sire)</b> You don't need to
shoot him because there is no message -- message (and I use that word
with reservations) was his old songwriting partner's department. So
maybe the title should be <i>Don't Shoot Me, I'm Only the Guitar
Player?</i> Except on the basis of this record, he doesn't have
anything interesting to offer in that realm anymore either. Besides,
who needs "message" anymore when your sole frame of reference is what
Fran Healey and the Gallagher brothers were doing better in the '90s?
Although if there's a "Some Might Say" or (ulp) "Writing to Reach You"
here, I'll happily scarf up whatever Morrissey's serving up at the
Staples Center. <b>C+</b></p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p><b>Roger Knox &amp; the Pine Valley Cosmonauts: <i>Stranger in My
Land</i> (Bloodshot)</b> Proves that "blacks" are alike the whole
world over, singer-songwriters too. <b>B&#150;</b></p>

<p><b>Josh Ritter: <i>The Beast in Its Tracks</i> (Pytheas
Recordings)</b> He just went through a terrible divorce -- can you
tell? <b>C+</b></p>

<p><b>Bilal: <i>A Love Surreal</i> (Entertainment One Music)</b> Or:
<i>A Lunk Supreme: Airhead's Redux</i>. <b>C+</b></p>

<p><b>Holly Williams: <i>The Highway</i> (Georgiana)</b> Shows
restraint by not mentioning Grandpa Hank until track two, whose own
"highway" is more lost than you think -- the title track is a
self-pitying plaint about being on tour. <b>C</b></p>

<p><b>Jake Bugg: <i>Jake Bugg</i> (Mercury)</b> Or, <i>The Freewheelin'
Lonnie Donnegan</i>. <b>C</b></p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p>This is the 29th installment, (almost) monthly since August 2010,
totalling 715 albums. All columns are indexed and archived
<a href="/ocston/guests/mt/">here</a>. You can follow <b>A Downloader's
Diary</b> on
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/pages/A-Downloaders-Diary/151562748213978">Facebook</a>, and on
<a href="http://twitter.com/#!/michael_tatum">Twitter</a>.</p>
        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
<entry>
    <link href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1966-Book-Roundup,-Part-Drei.html" rel="alternate" title="Book Roundup, Part Drei" type="text/html" />
    <author>
        <name>Tom Hull</name>
        <email>webmaster@tomhull.com</email>
    </author>

    <issued>2013-04-24T06:58:00Z</issued>
    <created>2013-04-24T06:58:00Z</created>
    <modified>2013-04-24T07:04:13Z</modified>
    <wfw:comment>http://tomhull.com/blog/wfwcomment.php?cid=1966</wfw:comment>

    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
    <wfw:commentRss>http://tomhull.com/blog/rss.php?version=atom0.3&amp;type=comments&amp;cid=1966</wfw:commentRss>

    <id>http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1966-guid.html</id>
    <title mode="escaped" type="text/html">Book Roundup, Part Drei</title>
    <content type="application/xhtml+xml" xml:base="http://tomhull.com/blog/">
        <div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<p>Still trying to unpack the overhang accumulated up to the
<a href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1947-Book-Roundup.html">
March 14</a> post, with a second installment on
<a href="http://tomhull.com/blog/archives/1948-Book-Roundup,-Part-Deux.html">
March 16</a>, although this one is delayed about as much as I should
normally do -- one result is that the queue isn't getting noticeably
shorter. So here's another batch of forty more/less recent book titles,
with more to follow relatively soon.</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p><b>Nicholson Baker: <i>The Way the World Works: Essays</i></b>
(2012, Simon &amp; Schuster): Fifteen years of short pieces by the
mostly novelist, including a couple I would certainly want to read
("The Charms of Wikipedia," and "Why I Am a Pacifist," the first
of three in the section on War). I haven't read his fiction, but
<i>Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II, the End of
Civilization</i> is a great book.</p>

<p><b>William J Baumol, et al: <i>The Cost Disease: Why Computers Get
Cheaper and Health Care Doesn't</i></b> (2012, Yale University Press):
An important subject, although it's not clear that Baumol has got the
answer right: health care is a dysfunctional market with a lot of
hidden (and frankly cancerous) monopolies. Other factors may add to
this, including some Baumol identifies (labor costs, lack of
productivity improvements).</p>

<p><b>William Blum: <i>America's Deadliest Export: Democracy: The
Truth About US Foreign Policy and Everything Else</i></b> (paperback,
2013, Zed Books): Longtime critic of US foreign policy. Previous
books include: <i>The CIA: A Forgotten History</i> (1986); <i>Rogue
State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower</i> (2000); <i>West-Bloc
Dissident: A Cold War Memoir</i> (2002); <i>Killing Hope: US Military
and CIA Interventions Since World War II</i> (2000; revised 2003);
<i>Freeing the World to Death: Essays on the American Empire</i>
(2004).</p>

<p><b>David Byrne: <i>How Music Works</i></b> (2012, McSweeney's):
Talking Heads frontman, Luaka Bop honcho, applies his experience
to a big topic, although I can imagine lots of different tangents
for "works" to take off in. Most likely: how music works for me.
Still, a topic of some interest.</p>

<p><b>Caitlin Carenen: <i>The Fervent Embrace: Liberal Protestants,
Evangelicals, and Israel</i></b> (2012, New York University Press):
The US has lots of reasons for being exceptionally sympathetic to
Israel, ranging from the founding bond of both being white settler
nations to the symbiosis of our overbloated arms industries, but
one of the most important is how Israel has played in protestant
thought -- both early on with liberal guilt over the Holocaust and
later with evangelicals pining for the apocalypse.</p>

<p><b>Victor Cha: <i>The Impossible State: North Korea, Past and
Future</i></b> (2012, Harper Collins): Former Bush admin NSC Korea
hand -- you know, the folks who concocted "the axis of evil" meme --
tries to explain North Korea, something I'm not sure anyone can do.
A couple years ago, when Barbara Demick wrote <i>Nothing to Envy:
Ordinary Lives in North Korea</i> (2009) there weren't many books,
but that's started to change. Relatively new: Andrei Lankov: <i>The
Real North Korea: Life and Politics in the Failed Stalinist Utopia</i>
(2013, Oxford University Press); BR Myers: <i>The Cleanest Race: How
North Koreans See Themselves and Why It Matters</i> (2010; paperback,
2011, Melville House); Bruce E Bechtol Jr: <i>The Last Days of Kim
Jong-Il: The North Korean Threat in a Changing Era</i> (2013, Potomac
Books). Still, I doubt if any on these shed much light on the latest
round of threats and condemnations.</p>

<p><b>Noam Chomsky: <i>9-11: Was There an Alternative?</i></b> (2001;
revised paperback, 2011, Seven Stories Press): Right then, right now.
Wish he could write better, but decades of being right and ignored
have taken a toll on his patience.</p>

<p><b>Noam Chomsky: <i>Occupy [Occupied Media Pamphlet Series]</i></b>
(paperback, 2012, Zucotti Park Press): Short (128 pp.) pamphlet,
meant to advise the Occupy movement. Looks like there will be a
series of these things, with additional titles by Stuart Leonard
(<i>Taking Brooklyn Bridge</i>), Mumia Abu-Jamal (<i>Message to
the Movement</i>), and Marina Sitrin/Dario Azzellini (<i>Occupying
Language</i>).</p>

<p><b>Noam Chomsky: <i>Power Systems: Conversations on Global Democratic
Uprisings and the New Challenges to US Empire</i></b> (paperback, 2013,
Metropolitan Books): Continues a long series of interviews with David
Barsamian, a context which draws out his wisdom without cluttering up
the page.</p>

<p><b>Climate Central: <i>Global Weirdness: Severe Storms, Deadly
Heat Waves, Relentless Drought, Rising Seas, and the Weather of
the Future</i></b> (2012, Pantheon): Written by Emily Elert and
Michael D Lemonick but credited to their "nonprofit, nonpartisan
science and journalism organization"; with just-the-facts-style
reporting, not that they ignore the applicable science.</p>

<p><b>Susan P Crawford: <i>Captive Audience: The Telecom Industry
and Monopoly Power in the New Gilded Age</i></b> (2012, Yale
University Press): Argues that the 2011 merger of Comcast and NBC
Universal "create the biggest monopoly since the breakup of Standard
Oil a century ago." During much of that time AT&amp;T monopolized
the telephone industry, but at least it was recognized as such and
tightly regulated -- so much so that it begged for breakup. The
new monopoly combines content as well as networking, which is what
makes it not just too expensive but far more dangerous.</p>

<p><b>Guy Debord: <i>Comments on the Society of the Spectacle</i></b>
(1987; third edition, paperback, 2011, Verso): Debord's original essay
was written in 1967. When I first read it (in <i>Radical America</i>,
1970) it illuminated all sorts of things, but the basic idea is simple
enough it requires little elaboration. The essay is short, as are the
comments (94 pp.); still, I've never figured out what you do with the
concept -- more likely than not it just leaves you awestruck.</p>

<p><b>John De Graaf/David K Batker: <i>What's the Economy For, Anyway?:
Why It's Time to Stop Chasing Growth and Start Pursuing Happiness</i></b>
(2011; paperback, 2012, Bloomsbury Press): Good question, one also
explored by Robert Skidelsky/Edward Skidelsky: <i>How Much Is Enough?
Money and the Good Life</i> (2012); Juliet B Schor: <i>Plenitude: The
New Economics of True Wealth</i> (2010); and Joseph E Stiglitz, et al.,
<i>Mismeasuring Our Lives: Why GDP Doesn't Ad Up</i> (2010).
[<a href="/ocston/books/degraaf-what.php">link</a>]</p>

<p><b>Ross Douthat: <i>Bad Religion: How We Became a Nation of
Heretics</i></b> (2012, Free Press): Conservative New York Times
columnist, tries to appear reasonable and rarely succeeds, wants
to bring back that old time religion, or something like that.
We would at long last do us a favor if he helps break the binds
between religion and partisanship, but the old time religion
never was much good at respecting others.</p>

<p><b>Peter Dreier: <i>The 100 Greatest Americans of the 20th Century:
A Social Justice Hall of Fame</i></b> (paperback, 2012, Nation Books):
Thumbnail biographies, 4-6 pages each (adding up to 512 pp.), political
people you should know at least something about, even though one can
nitpick the roster coming and going. Only two are younger than me
(Michael Moore and Tony Kushner). Three of the last ten are musicians,
and two are athletes, so the spectacle seems to have won out, especially
over the writers who have provided so much insight and kept the flame
going (Chomsky and Ehrenreich are about it since C. Wright Mills).</p>

<p><b>Jeff Faux: <i>The Servant Economy: Where America's Elite Is
Sending the Middle Class</i></b> (2012, Wiley): Previous book was
<i>The Global Class War: How America's Bipartisan Elite Lost Our
Future -- and What It Will Take to Win It Back</i>, so presumably
this returns to American specifics. Lots of recent books on the
destruction of the middle class, the ripe corrollary to the same
old, same old of rich-getting-richer and poor-getting-poorer.</p>

<p><b>Jonathan Fetter-Vorm: <i>Trinity: A Graphic History of the First
Atomic Bomb</i></b> (2012, Hill and Wang): Much shorter than Richard
Rhodes' epochal <i>The Making of the Atomic Bomb</i>, but they say a
picture is worth a thousand words. I've toyed with the idea of writing
graphic histories on the Cold War and the Arab-Israeli Conflict --
critical assumption here is that I can get my nephew to illustrate --
mostly because I wish to sharply focus on key understandings rather
than to just spew out a lot of narrative, and graphic histories seem
to offer a unique opportunity to state and reinforce basic points.</p>

<p><b>Robert K Fitts: <i>Banzai Babe Ruth: Baseball, Espionage, and
Assassination During the 1934 Tour of Japan</i></b> (2012, University
of Nebraska Press): Previously co-edited <i>Remembering Japanese
Baseball: An Oral History of the Game</i> and wrote <i>Wally Yonamine:
The Man Who Changed Japanese Baseball</i>, reports on one of the most
famous exhibition tours in history: a key event in Japan's adoption
of America's pastime as its own favorite sport, but also cover for
Moe Berg's espionage. Not sure who got assassinated.</p>

<p><b>Stephen M Gardiner: <i>A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical
Tragedy of Climate Change</i></b> (2011, Oxford University Press):
A philospher's take on the problem, seeing ignorance and inaction
as a lapse in ethics, looking into geo-engineering, etc.</p>

<p><b>Brandon L Garrett: <i>Convicting the Innocent: Where Criminal
Prosecutions Go Wrong</i></b> (2011; paperback, 2012, Harvard
University Press): DNA evidence has shown that quite a few innocent
people have been convicted of serious crimes. Analyzing those cases
should help identify how the justice system gets it wrong and winds
up creating injustice. Other recent books on this: Jim Petro/Nancy
Petro: <i>False Justice: Eight Myths That Convict the Innocent</i></b>
(2011, Kaplan); Daniel S Medwed: <i>Prosecution Complex: America's
Race to Convict and Its Impact on the Innocent</i></b> (2012, NYU
Press).</p>

<p><b>Wenonah Hauter: <i>Foodopoly: The Battle Over the Future of
Food and Farming in America</i></b> (2012, New Press): "Local food"
farmer, director of Food &amp; Water Watch, explains how agricultural
policy has been designed to aid Cargill, Tyson, Kraft, and ConAgra.</p>

<p><b>Tim Kane: <i>Bleeding Talent: How the US Military Mismanages
Great Leaders and Why It's Time for a Revolution</i></b> (2012,
Macmillan Palgrave): Right-wing economist (Hudson Institute, John
McCain), former USAF "intelligence" officer, "startup maven" (to
quote Bush economist Glenn Hubbard). I suspect his thesis is right,
but I have my doubts that "great leaders" is something the we need
the military to have, right now, or just about ever. Bean counters
and shrinks, that's another story.</p>

<p><b>Frederick Kaufman: <i>Bet the Farm: How Food Stopped Being
Food</i></b> (2012, Wiley): Starting with Domino's Pizza, hits all
the usual stops surveying the contemporary food industry, how it's
all related and tied more to finance than to old-fashioned interests
like agriculture. Related: Kara Newman: <i>The Secret Financial
Life of Food: From Commodities Markets to Supermarkets</i> (2012,
Columbia University Press).</p>

<p><b>George Lakoff/Elisabeth Wehling: <i>The Little Blue Book: The
Essential Guide to Thinking and Talking Democratic</i></b> (paperback,
2012, Free Press): Lakoff thinks we can solve all our problems by
coming up with better terminology to frame our arguments -- i.e.,
something other than what Frank Luntz comes up with. Supposedly this
is that.</p>

<p><b>Chris Lamb: <i>Conspiracy of Silence: Sportswriters and the
Long Campaign to Desegregate Baseball</i></b> (2012, University of
Nebraska Press): Previously wrote <i>Blackout: The Story of Jackie
Robinson's First Spring Training</i>, digs deeper here into the
press attitudes that reinforced the color line in baseball, and
a few journalists -- mostly blacks and/or communists, by the way --
who thought differently.</p>

<p><b>Charlie LeDuff: <i>Detroit: An American Autopsy</i></b> (2013,
Penguin Press): Local journalist, has watched Detroit decline from
1.9 million people to fewer than 700,000, as people left the city
for the suburbs or beyond while industry crumbled. I recall that
when I was visiting Detroit it was hard to find books on the city,
but that at least is looking up. For example, another is Mark Binelli:
<i>Detroit City Is the Place to Be: The Afterlife of an American
Metropolis</i> (2012, Metropolitan).</p>

<p><b>Jonathan Lethem: <i>The Ecstasy of Influence: Nonfictions,
Etc.</i></b> (2011, Doubleday): A novelist based in Brooklyn
dumps off scattered essays, mostly lit, some about music. Poking
around Amazon's "look inside" I can't get a sense of the whole,
but one fragment on "Disnial" is certainly sharp.</p>

<p><b>Jonathan Lethem: <i>Talking Heads' Fear of Music</i></b>
(paperback, 2012, Continuum): Part of their 33 1/3 series of
short books, where a writer picks out a single record and riffs
on it. This is number 86, a rare case with a celebrity author.</p>

<p><b>Audrea Lim, ed: <i>The Case for Sanctions Against Israel</i></b>
(paperback, 2012, Verso Books): Twenty essays here, including Omar
Barghouti, Naomi Klein, Ilan Pappe, Joel Beinin, John Berger, Neve
Gordon. Sanctions are a relatively non-belligerent way of expressing
concern over Israel's manifest unwillingness either to free occupied
Palestinians or to treat them equitably. Sanctions helped to tip the
balance in South Africa to end the apartheid regime. At some point I
fear they will be necessary to make any degree of progress toward
peace and justice in Israel-Palestine. Also see: Omar Barghouti:
Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions: The Global Struggle for Palestinian
Rights</i> (paperback, 2011, Haymarket Books).</p>

<p><b>William Marsden: <i>Fools Rule: Inside the Failed Politics
of Climate Change</i></b> (2011, Knopf Canada; paperback, 2012,
Vintage Canada): Canadian journalist, so good chance this focuses
more on Canadian politics than on riper targets in the US, not
that the anti-science opposition in both countries isn't driven
by the same oil and coal companies. Author previously wrote a
book on oil shale: <i>Stupid to the Last Drop: How Alberta Is
Bringing Environmental Armageddon to Canada (and Doesn't Seem
to Care)</i>.</p>

<p><b>GJ Meyer: <i>The Borgias: The Hidden History</i></b> (2013,
Bantam): Of interest mostly, I suspect, if you've followed Neil
Jordan's TV series and want to fill in some details, although it
looks like this book takes some unexpected turns. Also available,
and perhaps more conventional: Christopher Hibbert: <i>The Borgias
and Their Enemies: 1431-1919</i> (2008; paperback, 2009, Mariner
Books).</p>

<p><b>Loretta Napoleoni: <i>Maonomics: Why Chinese Communists Make
Better Capitalists Than We Do</i></b> (2011; paperback, 2012, Seven
Stories Press): Previously wrote <i>Rogue Economics: Capitalism's
New Reality</i> (2008), and ups the snark quotient here. Certainly
is the case that China's economic growth has outpaced ever corner
of the capitalist world for at least the last decade.</p>

<p><b>Mark Owen/Kevin Maurer: <i>No Easy Day: The Firsthand Account of
the Mission That Killed Osama Bin Laden</i></b> (2012, Dutton): Also
subtitled, <i>The Autobiography of a Navy Seal</i>. Second guy up the
stairs. First guy to cash in. Isn't that -- making a killing out of a
killing -- what America is really all about?</p>

<p><b>Joel Salatin: <i>Folks, This Ain't Normal: A Farmer's Advice
for Happier Hens, Healthier People, and a Better World</i></b> (2011;
paperback, 2012, Center Street): The Virginia farmer who loomed so
large in Michael Pollan's <i>The Omnivore's Dilemma</i> speaks for
himself -- not for the first time, either: previous books include:
<i>You Can Farm: The Entrepreneur's Guide to Start and Succeed in
a Farming Enterprise</i> (paperback, 1998, Polyface); <i>Holy Cows
&amp; Hog Heaven: The Food Buyer's Guide to Farm Friendly Food</i>
(paperback, 2005, Polyface); <i>Everything I Want to Do Is Illegal:
War Stories From the Local Food Front</i> (paperback, 2007, Polyface);
<i>The Sheer Ecstasy of Being a Lunatic Farmer</i> (paperback, 2010,
Polyface).</p>

<p><b>Josh Schonwald: <i>The Taste of Tomorrow: Dispatches From the
Future of Food</i></b> (2012, Harper Collins): Enthusiastic survey
of speculations about how food will be engineered and manufactured
in 2035.</p>

<p><b>James Gustave Speth: <i>America the Possible: Manifesto for
a New Economy</i></b> (2012, Yale University Press): Environmentalist,
previously wrote <i>The Bridge at the Edge of the World</i>, which
questions growth for growth's sake. Should expand on that here.</p>

<p><b>John Swenson: <i>New Atlantis: Musicians Battle for the Survival
of New Orleans</i></b> (2011; paperback, 2012, Oxford University Press):
A rock critic of my generation goes to post-Katrina New Orleans and
finds inspiration in the music -- where else would one work?</p>

<p><b>Gary Wills: <i>Why Priests? A Failed Tradition</i></b> (2013,
Viking): Always an interesting writer, although his commitment to
Catholicism has always baffled me, the issue here seeming like
someone else's personal fight.</p>

<p><b>Bob Woodward: <i>The Price of Politics</i></b> (2012, Simon &amp;
Schuster): Another inside-out first draft of history, his second on
Obama after four volumes on Bush, the first extolling his genius for
leadership and the last wondering where all that went. Focuses on
the budget battle with congressional Republicans, not anyone's best
hour. <i>New Yorker</i> review: "Woodward, who has here the elements
of a devastating study of Washingtonian pettiness, has instead
written a book that in many ways exemplifies it."</p>

<p><b>Luigi Zingales: <i>A Capitalism for the People: Recapturing the
Lost Genius of American Prosperity</i></b> (2012, Basic Books): Chicago
economist, argues that American capitalism is dying as the market gets
ever more regulated not just by "anti-market pitchfork populism" but
by crony corruption he associates with "Europe and much of the rest of
the world." Quick fix: trust the markets.</p>

<p><hr class="brk" /></p>

<p>Still don't have the paperback report together. Maybe next time.</p>
        </div>
    </content>
</entry>
</feed>