#^d 2019-05-12 #^h Weekend Roundup
I spent much of the week in Oklahoma, visiting my 92-year-old cousin, his two daughters, and various other family. I packed my Chromebook, then forgot it, so went a few days without my usual news sources -- not that anything much changed while I was away. Trying to catch up here, including a few links that seem possibly useful for future reference.
Looks pretty obvious from my "recent reading" sidebar that I'm in a gloomy mood about the viability of democracy in this nation. The odd book out is subtitled "On the Writing Process" -- thought that might inspire me to write about it, and it has made me a bit more self-conscious in my writing. The one I recommend most is Jason Stanley's How Fascism Works: The Politics of Us and Them. I lumped it into a list in my recent Book Reports, but it's well thought out and clear, with a fair smattering of historical examples but more focused on here and now: things you will recognize. I rather wish there was a more generic word than "fascism": one with less specific historical baggage, one that can be used in general discourse without tripping off unnecessary alarms. On the other hand, as a leftist, I've always had a keen nose for generic fascism, so the word suits my purposes just fine. I have, in fact, been using it since the 1970s, which is one reason the modern American conservative movement always seems to coherent and predictable.
Some scattered links this week:
Christine Ahn: More US pressure on North Korea is not the path to denuclearization.
Matt Apuzzo/Adam Satariano: Russia is targeting Europe's elections. So are far-right copycats. I don't doubt Russia's capacity for spreading cyber-havoc, but isn't it more likely that Russia is the copycat, echoing and amplifying the far-right?
Andrew J Bacevich: Why did we fight the Iraq War? Review of Michael J Mazarr's book, Leap of Faith: Hubris, Negligence, and America's Greatest Foreign Policy Tragedy.
Lily Batchelder: Trump is a bad businessman. Is he a tax cheat, too?
John Cassidy:
Joel Clement: Once again, the US embarrasses itself on climate change.
Matthew Cole: The Complete Mercenary: "How Erik Prince used the rise of Trump to make an improbable comeback."
Tim Dickinson: US fossil fuel subsidies exceed Pentagon spending: "according to a new report from the International Monetary Fund."
Timothy Egan: Revenge of the coastal elites: "How California, Oregon and Washington are winning the fight against Trump's hateful policies."
Neil Eggleston/Joshua A Geitzer: The court handling Trump's lawsuit must move at breakneck speed: "The president deserves his day in court. But the American people deserve that day to come quickly."
John Feffer:
A farewell to arms control? "With Trump and Bolton at the helm, the international arms control regime is effectively dead."
What's behind Bolton's attacks on the 'troika of tyranny'? "Bolton's broadsides against Cuba, Nicaragua, and Venezuela hint at ambitions for much more dangerous geopolitical conflict -- and nothing short of a new Cold War." You might think this impossible with the Soviet Union gone, and Russia more focused on promoting right-wing extremism, but the real enemy the US faced in the Cold War was always the workers and peasants oppressed by capitalists and their oligarchic allies, and that's an "enemy" that still exists.
Niall Ferguson/Eyck Freymann: The coming generation war: "The Democrats are rapidly becoming the party of the young -- and the consequences could be profound." There are few scholars I hold in lower regard than Ferguson, but there are enough charts and numbers here to let you think. I still think that class matters more than age, probably other demographic factors as well, but I wouldn't be surprised that age skews as advertised in all categories. Maybe you could object that class rises with age -- as successful people accumulate wealth, the poor die off younger -- but the rich are such a slim slice of the population even a big skew is unlikely to amount to much.
Ben Fountain: O billionaires!: Review of Michael R Bloomberg: Bloomberg by Bloomberg and Howard Schultz/Joanne Gordon: From the Ground Up: A Journey to Reimagine the Promise of America. One thing about these political wannabes: they'll never be accused of being traitors to their class.
Masha Gessen: Putin and Trump's ominous nostalgia for the Second World War.
Todd Gitlin: The roots of Trumpian agitprop.
Tara Golshan: Bernie Sanders's political revolution on foreign policy, explained. Related: Zack Beauchamp: What should a left foreign policy look like? An Elizabeth Warren adviser offers his vision. An interview with Ganesh Sitaraman, whose piece is: The emergence of progressive foreign policy. I still find parts of this disturbing, like the insistence on maintaining military alliances like NATO, as opposed to negotiating demilitarization and de-escalating conflicts through more even-handed institutions like the United Nations. Also, the shift in focus needs to be clearer: for a long time US foreign policy has mostly been dictated by the needs of multinational corporations, with little if any concern for economic justice, either for the majority of Americans or for people around the world.
Ryan Grim: The Democratic counterrevolution has a self-appointed leader: Josh Gottheimer.
James Hamblin: Has Trump actually done anything about drug prices?
William Hartung/Mandy Smithberger: A dollar-by-dollar tour of the national security state: How a "base budget" of $554.1 billion adds up to $1.2542 trillion.
Chris Hedges: Creeping toward tyranny: I haven't read Hedges for a few years now, so it hadn't quite sunk in how his principled hypersensitivity has decayed into an all-consuming pessimism (of the intellect, but also of the will):
Capitalists, throughout history, have backed fascism to thwart even the most tepid forms of socialism. All the pieces are in place. The hollowing out of our democratic institutions, which cannot be blamed on Trump, makes tyranny inevitable.
Bad timing to exempt Trump from any blame right now, as his defiance of Congressional subpoenas, his rejection (veto) of resolutions ending his border "state of emergency" and Yemen War support, and his unilateral sabre rattling over Venezuela and Iran are unprecedented. Still, he's right that the signs anticipated and enabled Trump. Indeed, we're likely to look back on his Bush-era books and accord him the honor of being our first major "premature anti-fascist" (as Americans who fought against the Fascists in Spain were labelled after the US declared war on Germany and Italy). The only real problem with his 2007 American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America was in focusing on gullible Christians rather than their secular manipulators. The last book I read by him was The Death of the Liberal Class (2010), which anticipated Thomas Frank's Listen, Liberal (2016), his broadside on mainstream Democrats. But when I checked out Hedges' latest book, America: The Farewell Tour, I couldn't get into it. I'm past needing to learn how bad it can get.
Murtaza Hussain: Right-wing Israeli author writes "The Virtue of Nationalism" -- and accidentally exposes its pitfalls: On Yoram Hazony. Pull quote: "Alongside Israel, there are two other countries Hazony claims have been similarly victimized by the shaming campaigns of liberals and globalists: apartheid South Africa and Serbia under the dictatorship of Slobodan Milosevic."
Sean Illing:
How golf explains Trump. Seriously. Interview with Rick Reilly, author of Commander in Cheat: How Golf Explains Trump, who says, "this guy cheats like a mafia accountant."
What's wrong with America? I debate Ben Shapiro. Wish he was better at it. Shapiro is a right-wing apologist/ideologue, whose latest book is The Right Side of History: How Reason and Moral Purpose Made the West Great. Related: Nesrin Malik: Seeing Ben Shapiro flounder might be fun, but far-right celebrities are no joke.
Jake Johnson: Juan Guaidó makes open plea for US military coordination in Venezuela.
Fred Kaplan:
The US accepted more than 1 million refugees after Vietnam. What changed about us? Recounts a story from George Packer's new book, Our Man: Richard Holbrooke and the End of the American Century. Kaplan doesn't really answer the question, other than that "there are no Holbrookes or Mondales in positions of power to change that."
John Bolton is leading Donald Trump (and the rest of us) into conflicts in Iran, Venezuela, and North Korea. Alternate title: "John Bolton's dream world." Pull quote: "Bolton's ambitions -- which play well to Trump's mix of xenophobia and narcissism -- are, finally, getting us in a lot of trouble."
Greg Kaufmann: Trump has a new solution for poverty: pretend poor people don't exist: "A proposal to redefine 'poverty' would throw potentially millions of low-income people out of government-assistance programs."
E Tammy Kim: Do corporations like Amazon and Foxconn need public assistance?
Jen Kirby: US-China trade talks end with no deal -- and more tariffs.
Ezra Klein:
Facebook is a capitalism problem, not a Mark Zuckerberg problem. Response to Facebook co-founder Chris Hughes's op-ed: It's time to break up Facebook.
Democrats need a power agenda, not just a policy agenda: "Concentration of power is the problem, so redistribution of power is the policy."
Sarah Kliff: Trump to Congress: pass legislation to end surprise medical bills: "The president has a good idea on health care -- and one that could actually pass."
Elizabeth Kolbert: Climate change and the new age of extinction: Until now, or maybe I just mean recently, this hasn't had much to do with climate.
To keep nearly eight billion people fed, not to mention housed, clothed, and hooked on YouTube, humans have transformed most of the earth's surface. Seventy-five per cent of the land is "significantly altered," the I.P.B.E.S. noted in a summary of its report, which was released last week in Paris. In addition, "66 per cent of the ocean area is experiencing increasing cumulative impacts, and over 85 per cent of wetlands (area) has been lost." Approximately half the world's coral cover is gone. In the past ten years alone, at least seventy-five million acres of "primary or recovering forest" have been destroyed.
Habitat destruction and overfishing are, for now, the main causes of biodiversity declines, according to the I.P.B.E.S., but climate change is emerging as a "direct driver" and is "increasingly exacerbating the impact of other drivers." Its effects, the report notes, "are accelerating." Watson wrote last week, in the Guardian, that "we cannot solve the threats of human-induced climate change and loss of biodiversity in isolation. We either solve both or we solve neither."
Related: Brad Plumer: Humans are speeding extinction and altering the natural world at an 'unprecedented' pace. Also: Robert Watson: Loss of biodiversity is just as catastrophic as climate change; Jonathan Watts: Human society under urgent threat from loss of Earth's natural life; Damian Carrington: What is biodiversity and why does it matter to us?.
Mike Konczal: Want to expand Medicare? Then answer the $5 trillion questions. "If you think the fight with insurance companies is tough, just wait until single-payer advocates have to go head-to-head with doctors." Admits that switching to "Medicare for All" could save overall health care costs ($2.1 trillion is the number given), but that assumes cost cuts, only 20% of which come from eliminating the insurance companies, with 70% expected to come from paying doctors and hospitals less. I don't see much of a problem here, although as usual the devil is in the details. Big chunks of that 70% can be recovered without hitting the wages of doctors, nurses, and other essential personnel. I also see reason to cap top earners, but that's something that should be done not just with doctors and administrators -- inequality is a problem everywhere. On the other hand, why not just focus on easy wins like cutting the private insurance companies out?
Paul Krugman:
Killing the Pax Americana: "Trump's trade war is about more than economics."
Trump is terrible for rural America: "His biggest supporters are his biggest victims."
The economics of Donald J Keynes: "Austerity for Democrats, stimulus for Republicans."
The sabotage years: "What we now know about GOP economics."
The zombie style in American politics: "Why bad ideas just won't stay dead."
Michael Kruse: Beto's long history of failing upward: I've tended to resist citing links on candidates, but this one is fairly deep. O'Rourke is one I don't have much enthusiasm for, but while this is sharply critical, it doesn't really lower my estimation of him.
Talia Lavin: A reporter's long, strange trip into the darkest parts of the American mind: Review of Anna Merlan's new book, Republic of Lies: American Conspiracy Theorists and Their Surprising Rise to Power. With a picture of Alex Jones.
Charles Leerhsen: Trump, the billion-dollar loser -- I was his ghostwriter and saw it happen.
Ariel Levy: Who owns South Africa?: "A fiercely debated program of land reform could address racial injustice -- or cause chaos."
Dahlia Lithwick: Are we in a constitutional crisis? "This is how democracy ends: not with a bang, but with a long and technical debate over whether we're using the right words."
PR Lockhart: 65 years after Brown v Board of Education, school segregation is getting worse.
German Lopez: North Dakota quietly decriminalized marijuana.
Ella Nilsen:
David Owen: Is noise pollution the next big public-health crisis? Owen has a book coming out this fall: Volume Control: Hearing in a Deafening World.
Gareth Porter: Bolton is spinning Israeli 'intelligence' to push for war against Iran. Related: Sharmini Peries: The Trump Administration is manufacturing an Iran crisis.
Gabriela Resto-Montero:
Trump asked Don McGahn to publicly state he didn't obstruct justice. McGahn refused.
Rudy Giuliani cancels Ukraine trip amid criticism he's courting election interference. Related: Robert Mackey: A Republican conspiracy theory about a Biden-in-Ukraine scandal has gone mainstream. But it is not true.
James Reston Jr.: Trump's other impeachable offense: "As Nixon learned, Congress will not abide a president who defies its subpoenas."
Jason Rezaian: Are we watching John Bolton's last stand? "Is John Bolton about to get the Iran war he's always wanted, or is he on the verge of losing his job?" I don't credit Trump with much insight or diligence on foreign policy, but even so he must suspect that Bolton was a remarkably poor pick as National Security Adviser. In particular, Bolton has his own agenda, and has no scruples about contravening and undermining Trump's own stated objectives. So it would make a lot of sense for Trump to fire Bolton (and Pompeo, who is an only slightly less egregious hawk, as well). Indeed, if I thought I'd get into the president's ear, I'd write an op-ed taunting Trump to do just that, justifying it as key to his 2020 re-election prospects. I'm still convinced that a major reason Trump beat Clinton in 2016 was her "commander-in-chief test," where she came off as the more dangerous hawk. Hiring Bolton undoes much of Trump's edge there, even if he doesn't trick Trump into much bigger wars.
Corey Robin: Eric Hobsbawm, the communist who explained history: Review of Richard Evans' biography, Eric Hobsbawm: A Life in History, referring back to Hobsbawm's own memoir, Interesting Times, and various of his books like The Age of Extremes (on the 20th century).
Joe Romm: A new brain study shows a better way to engage voters on climate change: Call it "climate crisis."
Aaron Rupar: Trump turns shooting migrants into a punchline at Florida rally.
Rebecca Solnit: Unconscious bias is running for president: "On Elizabeth Warren and the false problem of "likeability." Recommended by a Facebook friend, this is a bit more than half right, but suffers from an as-yet-unnamed form of specious argument related to the "mansplaining" that Solnit has written extensively about. I don't doubt that the prejudices she decries are real, but the "privileges" she seeks to overthrow have never struck me as worth much. On the other hand, note that Warren's response to these prejudices hasn't been to whine about them. She's talking to the so-called privileged, and seems to be winning them over: Alex Thompson: Trump backers applaud Warren in heart of MAGA country.
Emily Stewart: Trump lost $1 billion over 10 years, New York Times report shows: "So much for Trump's brand as a savvy, self-made business leader."
Matt Taibbi: On the trail with Bernie Sanders 2.0.
Astra Taylor: Time's up for capitalism. But what comes next? "Every day, we help decide how the future will unfold. But how do we cast ballots for a democracy that doesn't yet exist?" Adapted from her forthcoming book, Democracy May Not Exist but We'll Miss It When It's Gone. I've long meant to read her previous book, The People's Platform: Taking Back Power and Culture in the Digital Age (2014), recommended by a friend.
Laura Tillem: Let's hit the pause button on more space for prosecutors: op-ed on prison overcrowding here in Wichita.
Jeffrey Toobin: The constitutional system is not build to resist Trump's defiance of Congress.
Anton Troianovski:
On a Russian outpost in the Pacific, fear and fantasies of a Japanese future: Aren't we accustomed to thinking of Russia as revanchist, seeking to regain territories of the former Russian/Soviet empire, but it looks here like Japan is the one with the stronger bent.
w/Josh Dawsey/Paul Sonne: Trump's interest in stirring Ukraine investigations sows confusion in Kiev.
Alex Ward: Trump's Iran policy is making war more likely.
Matthew Yglesias:
Matt Zapotosky: Trump would have been charged with obstruction were he not president, hundreds of former federal prosecutors assert.
I don't have much to say about Game of Thrones, but I was struck by this ratiocination by Zack Beauchamp: "But it's one thing for Daenerys to act like Bush, and another for her to act like Hitler." He's talking about the indiscriminate fire-bombing of cities full of innocent civilians, but while Bush criminally started wars, lied about his reasoning, rounded up and tortured supposed enemies, disrupted the lives of millions doing irreparable harm, just to show the world that it's more important to fear his "shock and awe" than to respect his self-proclaimed beneficence, and while Hitler did those same things on an even more epic scale, the most comparable historical example of a leader laying waste to entire cities was Harry Truman -- who we generally recall as an exceptionally decent and modest president.
You can say that war does that, even to otherwise decent people. You can say that Hitler and Bush were worse than Truman because they started wars whereas Truman was simply trying to end one he had inherited. (This is not the place to get into how he escalated the Cold War and the Korean War, which in many ways I find more troubling than his "final solution" to WWII.) You can say that Hitler was worse than Bush because his desire for war was more deeply rooted in the uncritical imperialism and racism of the era, which made him even more vindictive and bloodthirsty. But I'd also note that Truman was not above the prejudices of Hitler's era, and that Bush (while less racist than Truman let alone Hitler) was, like all conservatives ever, fully committed to traditional hierarchies of wealth and power, which made it easy for him to run roughshod over all the others.
I have no idea where Daenerys fits among this trio, as she is a fictional character in an imaginary world. Even if she reflects the world of her creators, she does so haphazardly and inconsistently.