#^d 2024-04-28 #^h Speaking of Which
I started working on this around Wednesday, April 17, anticipating another long and arduous week. But I thought I'd be able to get in a Book Roundup before posting, so I numbered my draft files accordingly. When that didn't happen (which was like the second or third week in a row), I decided to hold back Speaking of Which and Music Week until I posted the Book Roundup. That turned out to be Thursday, April 25. This draft has picked up a few new pieces along the way, but I'm only getting back to it in earnest on April 26.
I thought then I might try to wrap it up in a day, but was soon overwhelmed by all the new material I had missed. So now it's slipped to Sunday, making this a two-week compilation, but at least putting me back on the usual schedule. Another thought I had on resuming was that I should write an introduction to summarize my main points. Probably too late to do anything like that this week, but over the last couple days, I've expanded on many of these pieces where the articles seemed to call for it. So I'll leave it to you to fish out the essential summaries.
I decided to push this out Sunday evening, even though I didn't quite manage to hit all the sources I wanted. Perhaps I'll catch some misses on Monday, while I'm working on the also delayed Music Week. They'll be flagged, as usual, like this paragraph. (Note that my initial counts are about double typical weeks, which makes this easily the longest Speaking of Which ever. So while I've been slow posting, I haven't been slacking off.)
A few noted tweets:
Tanisha Long: Nothing radicalizes a generation of debt burdened
young people like sending 26 billion dollars to fund a genocidal
terror state.
[To which, The Debt Collective added]: Telling generations of
young people that there isn't enough money for free college or free
healthcare and then spending billions to commit the gravest assault
on Gaza really does elicit a very particular type of rage.
Robert Wright: [Reacting to headline: Democrats Upbeat After Sudden Wins on Ukraine and Auto Worker] This is naive. The only way the Ukraine funding becomes a political asset for Biden is if there's a peace deal before November. Otherwise Trump has him right where he wants him: spending tax dollars on an endless war.
Tony Karon: [Commenting on a Jewish Voice for Peace tweet] Shkoyach! It's actually anti-Semitic to conflate Jews with Israel - all my adult life I've been an anti-Zionist Jew, because I want no part of an apartheid state whose existence is based on sustained racist violence on the people it displaced and subordinated.
Some who've been raised to put a blue-and-white calf above Jewish values now dread Israel being recognized as a genocidal apartheid state. They're not unsafe, they're uncomfortable. But 10000s of Jews stand up for Palestinian freedom - because it's the Jewish thing to do.
[Tweet links to their statement: We're fighting to stop a genocide. Slanders against our movements are a distraction.]
Nathan J Robinson: Joe Biden might want to read about what happened to one of his Democratic predecessors who also presided over a war unpopular with young people and had a party convention scheduled in Chicago.
Max Blumenthal: Genocide friendly gentile gov Greg Abbott swore
allegiance to a foreign apartheid state
UT students are under occupation
[photo of Abbott in wheelchair with kippah prostrating himself to
the temple wall is emblematic of America's political class; I still
have to ask, why does this play so well to basically antisemitic
Christian nationalists?]
Greg Sargent: Agree with this from @lionel_trolling: Trump's
trial "cuts him down to size" and reveals him as "a common, banal
criminal."
FWIW, we did a pod episode with polling on how the trial makes
Trump look "grubby" and "small" and why this wrecks his aura.
In the criminal trial in Manhattan and the Supreme Court oral arguments, the two different sides of Donald Trump are fully on display. On the one hand, in Alvin Bragg's criminal trial, we have Trump-in-himself: he's a petty conman, a quasi-gangster, who lives in a world of pornstars and pay offs to tabloids. There he's an old man who is falling asleep in court. And maybe not because he's aging either: the Trump trial is actually kind of boring; it's quotidian sleaze that can't break through the news about Gaza and the student protests. People have criticized Bragg's decision to prosecute Trump, but it occurred to me that maybe there's a quiet brilliance in the move; it cuts Trump down to size and shows him to the world to be just what he is: a common, banal criminal. It even made me wonder at the wisdom of my insistence on Trump's fascistic qualilties. Does not that just add to his myth? Perhaps he is just kind of a nothing.
There is no reason to think Trump's trial helps him outside his
MAGA base.
"He is not the alpha. He is falling asleep. HE is subjected to
censure," says @anatosaurus. He looks "small" and his conempt for
the law . . .
Ryan Grim: [commenting on an Ari Fleischer counterfactual that "If Students for Trump launched encampments at colleges . . . every student would be immediately arrested, discipline and the camps torn down"] If cops started beating up and arresting a bunch of college Trump supporters the left would probably chuckle at the irony but oppose the abuse and defend their basic rights. I certainly would do both, and that's ok.
Greg Magarian reports from Washington University, St. Louis:
If you've been wondering about the content of pro-Palestinian campus protests, I just got back from one. Things I did NOT hear or see: (1) Even the barest aspersion cast on Jewish people or any Jewish person. The only appearance of the word "Jew" or any variation thereon was as a self-identifier (e.g., "Jews Against Genocide"). (2) Even the barest deviation from peacefulness and good order. If you haven't been to a public protest, I can tell you that protest organizers know their work well. They're way too disciplined to indulge "rioting." (3) Anything that a reasonable person could construe as a call for violence against Israeli civilians. Resistance to occupation, Palestinian self-determination, anti-Zionism? Sure. Every human being has the right to speak up and out for their own aspirations. This movement is about equal Palestinian humanity -- no more, no less.
Magarian also posted this video and comment:
This is what my university did today. It was a peaceful protest. The university administration decided to respond with violence. Wash U's support for Israel has gotten much easier to understand: institutions that believe might makes right, that have no problem stomping on anyone who gets in their way, have to stick together.
Also see this post on St. Louis by Tinus Ritmeester (not sure how I got into the "with others" list, but thanks), which also includes a longer report from Megan-Ellyia Green.
Also, note this protest sign: "Over 200 zip-tied Palestinians found executed in a hospital & you are upset at our protest???"
A Howard Zinn quote is making the rounds again: "They'll say we're disturbing the peace, but there is no peace. What really bothers them is that we are disturbing the war."
Initial count: 317 links, 15,302 words. Updated count [05-01]: 328 links, 16,177 words.
Israel:
Mondoweiss: This excellent series of daily reports is getting a bit spottier, perhaps overwhelmed by the other news that has flooded this invaluable website.
[04-15] Day 192: European countries urge Israel not to respond to Iran attack; Israeli army targets Gazans returning north: "Germany, France and the UK called upon Israel 'not to escalate' after Iran's strike on Saturday. Israel killed 43 Palestinians attempting to return home to north Gaza as Hamas presents a new counter-proposal for a ceasefire."
[04-16] Day 193: Israel 'considers' strike against Iran, continues to deny entry of aid into Gaza: "Israel says it is considering a strike against Iran "that would not lead to a war" as it continues to restrict aid access to the Strip. Meanwhile, settlers in the West Bank escalated attacks against villages, killing two Palestinians."
[04-17] Day 194: Palestinians mark 'Prisoners Day' with more than 9,500 in Israeli jails: "On Palestinian Prisoners' Day, rights groups report at least 5,000 Palestinians have been detained from Gaza since October 7, and at least 16 Palestinians have died in Israeli detention amid unprecedentedly inhumane conditions."
[04-18] Day 195: Israel army withdraws from Gaza's Nuseirat refugee camp, says Rafah is next: "The Palestinian Red Crescent accused the Israeli army of preventing medical teams from reaching the injured. Meanwhile, Human Rights Watch said evidence shows Israeli soldiers are participating in settler attacks in the West Bank."
[04-19] Day 196: Israel strikes Iran, Gaza health ministry says Israel destroyed the Strip's health system: "Israel targets Iranian bases in Isfahan with drones, while Iranian sources say air defenses intercepted the attack. Meanwhile, Gaza's health ministry says the northern Gaza Strip is left without any health services."
[04-22] Day 199: Israel kills 14 Palestinians in West Bank city of Tulkarem: "Palestinians in the West Bank city of Tulkarem are mourning 14 victims killed by an Israeli raid on the city's Nur Shams refugee camp over the weekend. The invasion lasted 52 hours and destroyed much of the camp's infrastructure.
[04-25] Day 202: Gaza's Civil Defense finds hundreds of new bodies in mass graves at Nasser Hospital: "While Israel continues to attack all parts of the Gaza Strip, Palestinian Civil Defense teams report finding more bodies buried in mass graves in areas where Israeli troops have withdrawn. The Civil Defense says that some may have been buried alive."
Ramzy Baroud: [04-25] The ideological coup: How far right Kahanist extremists became the face of Israel.
Medea Benjamin/Nicholas JS Davies:
Cesar Chelala: [04-15] Netanyahu bolstered Hamas.
Juan Cole:
Sophia Goodfriend: [04-25] Why human agency is still central to Israel's AI-powered warfare: "International law and AI experts explain how Israel's top brass and global tech firms are implicated in the slaughter."
Tareq S Hajjaj:
Human Rights Watch: [04-27] West Bank: Israel responsible for rising settler violence, displacement of entire Palestinian communities.
Ellen Ioanes: [04-25] Mass graves at two hospitals are the latest horrors from Gaza.
David Lloyd: [04-24] Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian and the 'liquidation of all untruths': "Dr. Nadera Shalhoub-Kevorkian's detention confirms what the BDS movement has long argued: Israeli universities are first and foremost instruments of the state and agents of Zionism's project of dispossession and apartheid rule."
Qassam Muaddi:
[04-24] Palestinians in Tulkarem describe the 'most violent' Israeli raid in years.
[04-29] Recent settler violence in the West Bank, explained: "Recent settler attacks against the villages bordering the Jordan Valley between Nablus and Ramallah aren't random. They are part of a historic Israeli policy to annex the Jordan Valley and expel the Palestinian communities that live there."
Orly Noy: [04-26] From the river to the sea, Israel is waging the same war: "The Gaza assault cannot be understood separately from Israel's divide-and-conquer strategy against Palestinians in Jenin, Jerusalem, and Nazareth."
Jonathan Ofir: [04-22] Netanyahu exploits Passover for more biblical genocide propaganda.
Yumna Patel: [04-23] The student protests for Palestine are awe-inspiring. But we must not get distracted from Gaza.
Mitchell Plitnick: [04-27] The Rafah invasion will be catastrophic.
Will Porter: [04-26] How many Israelis killed by 'friendly fire'?
Vijay Prashad: [02-14] There is no place for the Palestinians of Gaza to go.
Falastine Saleh: [04-22] Settler terrorism: Palestinians are becoming prisoners in their own homeland.
Sigal Samuel: [04-11] The untold story of Arab Jews -- and their solidarity with Palestinians: "Jews from the Arab and Muslim world had a radical vision for Israeli-Palestinian peace."
Haleema Shah: [04-17] Is Israel a "settler-colonial" state? The debate, explained. Well, of course it is. If you don't understand that much, you don't understand much of anything. As such, it shares many traits with other "settler-colonial" states, "successful" ones like America, Canada, Australia, and Argentina, also "failed" ones like South Africa and Algeria. The difference between "successful" and "failed" is usually just a numbers game: immigrants made up large majorities in the former, minorities in the latter. From 1950-67, after partition, expulsion of Palestinians, and a wave of immigrants, Israel reached a 70% settler population, which should have counted as a success, but their armed expansion in 1967 brought the population share back to 50%, which has changed little since then (despite a major wave of Russian immigration, plus some Ethiopians). Israel has remained a settler state, but only due to discriminatory laws and considerable force.
While there is no way to explain Israeli behavior except as the legacy of a settler-colonial project, which has resulted in a state where the settler community exercises harshly prejudicial power over the native population, the question of what happens next should still remain open. Such a state is inherently unstable, prone to periodic revolts and repression, which ultimately hurt even those who for the time seem to be on top. The article talks about "decolonization" as one possible resolution. For a long time, many Palestinians saw that as a goal, much like Algerians sought to expel French colonists. At this point, only a few Israelis have any hope they can solve their problems by genocide. Those who know better need to bring themselves to some kind of mutual coexistence. There are many ideas that could work here. But first we need to realize that the tiered settler-state isn't one of them, and to do that, we must acknowledge that such a state exists now, as it has since 1920 and 1948, and that it is the source of all the pain and suffering today.
Richard Silverstein:
[04-11] Netanyahu and Biden: Gaza's biggest losers: "Each has failed to achieve any of his objectives from the Gaza War."
[04-12] Gaza, genocide and Holocaust exceptionalism: "There is no genocide, including the Holocaust, which is unique or exceptional." Really? I would stress that they are all unique, but that they intersect in the horror, disgust, and shame we all feel in witnessing them.
[04-18] Israel expects ICC arrest warrants next month: "Netanyahu and IDF senior commanders face arrest for war crimes."
[04-22] Israeli attack destroyed Iranian nuclear plant's air defenses.
[04-24] IDF, Egypt and UAE build Gaza refugee tent city, Rafah invasion imminent.
[04-25] Entire Israeli Security Command to be sacked after 10/7 debacle.
[04-28] Israel offers refugee aid plan to precede Rafah invasion.
Oren Ziv: [04-18] 'The soldiers opened the way for the settlers': Pogroms surge across West Bank: "Armed Israeli settlers raided more than a dozen Palestinian communities under the army's guard, leaving a trail of death and destruction in their wake."
Israel vs. Iran:
David Kay: [2010-08-19] Bombs of August: Someone reminded me of this old article, which stated: "By asserting that a nuclear Iran is unacceptable and jockying with the Israelis we are being led by the nose into war. The Israelis are using fear on Iran as a bargaining chip over settlements in Palestine." They still are. Obama thought better, and realized that he could allay Israel's stated fears more effectively by negotiating a deal which would put Iran's nuclear program into a deep freeze, buying time to normalize relations, which would be the only real long-term guarantee of peace. But for Israel, peace with Iran would diminish their leverage over America, which is what they really needed to "finish off" the Palestinians -- Israel is a very small country, with a fortress mentality that only worries about its immediate sphere. Iran was distant, disinterested, and theoretically cowered by Israel's own nuclear threat. So Israel lobbied Trump, who compliantly killed the deal, thus rekindling the threat, and rebuilding it by provoking relatively helpless groups they called "Iran's proxies."
Javed Ali: [04-16] Shadow war no more: With direct warfare between Israel and Iran, is there any going back?
Michael Arria: [04-18] The Shift: War with Iran?
Zack Beauchamp: [04-15] Israel beat Iran -- for now: "Iran's Saturday attack on Israel was a military failure. But things could still get a lot worse." Written before they did, so expect an update.
Daniel Brumberg: [04-15] Iran's risky bid to redefine deterrence with Israel. Or to remind us yet again that "deterrence" is as likely to start wars as to prevent them?
Jonathan Cook: [04-18] The West now wants 'restraint' -- after months of fueling a genocide in Gaza.
Ivan Eland: [04-23] Israel can still drag the US into war with Iran: "The tit-for-tat has ended for now, but Benjamin Netanyahu has many incentives to continue goading Tehran."
Jon Hoffman: [04-16] Benjamin Netanyahu is pushing for war with Iran. Well, he's pushing for the US to go to war with Iran, but he's willing to hum a few bars to get them started.
Ellen Ioanes:
[04-13] Iran's retaliatory attack against Israel, briefly explained.
[04-19] Israel and Iran's conflict enters a new, dangerous phase: "Israel launched strikes in response to Iran's retaliatory attack."
Patrick Kinglsey: [04-14] Strikes upend Israel's belief about Iran's willingness to fight it directly: "Israel had grown used to targeting Iranian officials without head-on retaliation from Iran, an assumption overturned by Iran's attacks on Saturday." More NY Times:
Ronen Bergman/Farnaz Fassihi/Eric Schmitt/Adam Entous/Richard Pérez-Peña: [04-17] Miscalculation leads to escalation as Israel and Iran clash.
Matthew Mpoke Bigg/Michael Levenson: [04-17] Israeli response to Iran attack seems inevitable, despite allies' pleas.
Cassandra Vinograd: [04-14] Iran's attacks bring long shadow war with Israel into the open: The word "war" usually denotes two sides fighting, so its use here is tactical, an attempt to spread liability for Israel's unilateral hostile acts, which have ranged from cyberattacks and assassinations of Iranian scientists to targeting of Iranians in Syria. Iran's role in Syria has been to support the Assad regime against other Syrians, but neither Iran nor Syria have threatened Israel, even when Israel targeted them. As for "Iran's proxies," there is no evidence of Iran directing them, and such hostilities as have occurred were arguably in defense/retaliation against Israeli attacks. (If you wonder where they got the idea of retaliation, you really haven't been paying much attention.) As someone who rejects Israel's claim that its retaliations are justified as self-defense, I'm not going to make excuses for Iran's own recent exercise in retaliation. But the only nation that seems fully intent upon war is Israel, and pretending otherwise just makes it easier for Israel to escalate and provoke.
Ken Klippenstein/Daniel Boguslaw:
Eldar Mamedov: [04-25] It's time for Iran and Israel to talk: "It's an unlikely scenario but Tel Aviv and Tehran will have to come to a modicum of co-existence at some point before all out war breaks out."
James North: [04-14] The mainstream US media is hiding key truths in its coverage of Iran's retaliatory attack.
Israel vs. world opinion: First, let's break out stories on the rising tide of anti-genocide protests on American university campuses:
Spencer Ackerman: [04-25] Now the students are "terrorists": "Politicians and administrators are playing the 9/11 Era hits against students protesting a genocide -- and want to badly to kill them."
Michael Arria:
Narek Boyajian/Jadelyn Zhang: [04-25] We are occupying Emory University to demand immediate divestment from Israel and Cop City.
Nandika Chatterjee: [04-16] Republican Senator Tom Cotton urges followers to attack pro-Palestine protesters who block traffic.
Fabiola Cineas: [04-18] Why USC canceled its pro-Palestinian valedictorian: "As the school year winds down, colleges are still grappling with student speech."
Julian Epp: [04-16] Campus protests for Gaza are proliferating -- and so is the repression.
Henry Giroux: [04-26] Poisoning the American mind: Student protests in the age of the new McCarthyism.
Luke Goldstein: [04-26] Pro-Israel groups pushed for warrantless spying on protesters.
Chris Hedges: [04-25] Revolt in the universities: Also note: [04-25] Princeton U. police stop Chris Hedges' speech on Gaza.
Caitlin Johnstone: [04-26] Will quashing university protests and banning TikTok make kids love Israel?
Sarah Jones:
[04-20] Isra Hirsi on the resilience of Columbia University's pro-Palestinian protests. For more info:
Intelligencer staff: [04-18] NYPD arrests pro-Palestinian protesters at Columbia University: How it happened.
[04-24] Student protesters are schooling their universities.
Ed Kilgore: [04-26] The GOP is making campus protests a 2024 law-and-order issue: At last they've finally found a law that they want to enforce. And they sure aren't afraid of looking like authoritarian thugs in doing so. That's the rep they want to own.
Branko Marcetic: [04-24] Why they're calling student protesters antisemites: "They want us talking about anything other than the genocide in Gaza."
James North: [04-20] The media is advancing a false narrative of 'rising antisemitism' on campus by ignoring Jewish protesters.
Nushrat Nur: [04-20] Long live the student resistance: "University administrators fail to understand that student activists have glimpsed a remarkable future in which Palestinian liberation is possible. The Gaza Solidarity Encampment at Columbia University is an inspiration to stay the course." Or maybe they do understand, and just don't want to see it happen?
Andrew O'Hehir: [04-28] Columbia crisis: Another massive failure of liberalism: "Columbia's president capitulated to the right-wing witch hunt -- and only made things worse."
I intend to work my way back around to the instructive case of Columbia president Minouche Shafik, who apparently believed she could galaxy-brain her way around the protest crisis -- and avoid the fate of ousted Harvard president Claudine Gay, among others -- by capitulating in advance to the House Republicans' witch-trial caucus, taking a hard line against alleged or actual antisemitism, and finally calling the cops on her own students. Spoiler alert: None of that was a good idea, and she probably didn't save her job anyway.
When he returns to Shafik, he nominates her "if you wanted to choose one individual as the face of 'neoliberalism' for an encyclopedia netry." But more important is this:
First of all, it's more accurate to say that the media-consuming public is riveted by the contentious political drama surrounding those scenes of campus discord than by the protests themselves, which are a striking sign of the times but hardly a brand new phenomenon. . . . It's also worth noting that America's extraordinary narcissism -- another quality shared across the political spectrum -- creates a global distortion effect whereby the deaths of at least 34,000 people in a conflict on the other side of the world are transformed into a domestic political and cultural crisis. Nobody actually dies in this domestic crisis, but everyone feels injured: Public discourse is boiled down to idiotic clichés and identity politics is reduced to its dumbest possible self-caricature.
I hate the both-sides-ism here: I don't doubt the shared narcissism and symbol-mongering, but "on the other side of the world" a nation with a long history of racial/ethnic discrimination and repression has advanced to the systematic destruction of a large segment of its people -- the applicable legal term here is "genocide" on a level with few historical analogues. So the dividing line -- opposing the practice of genocide, or supporting it mostly by trying to obscure the issue -- is very real and very serious, even if none of the American protesters are living in terror of their own homes, food sources, and hospitals being bombed. Moreover, while Israel/Gaza may be literally as distant as Congo, Myanmar, or Ukraine, it is a lot closer emotionally, especially for American Jews, who are most sharply divided, but also for any American who believes in equal rights, in freedom and justice for all -- people who would normally support the Democratic Party, but now find themselves torn and ashamed by a President who seems aligned and complicit with the forces committing genocide.
Katherine Rosman: [04-26] Student protest leader at Columbia: 'Zionists don't deserve to live': "After video surfaced on social media, the student said on Friday that his comments were wrong." I dropped the name, because after the retraction, why should he have to live in Google fame forever just for a casual remark? But the New York Times considers this news, because it fits their mission as purveyors of Israeli lines, especially larded with further comments like "it's one of the more blatant examples of antisemitism and, just, rhetoric that is inconsistent with the values that we have at Columbia" and "there's a danger for all students to have somebody using that type of rhetoric on campus." Doesn't that just echo the official rationale for having all those students arrested?
Personally, I would never think such a thing, much less say it, nor would most of the people offended enough by genocide to show up at a protest, but really who are we to make a major issue out of such sentiments? There's a Todd Snider lyric that captured a very common, if not quite ubiquitous, credo, which is "in America, we like our bad guys dead."
If some guy goes berserk and starts shooting up a school or church, then is shot himself, we rarely count him among the victims. We have presidents who go order the assassination of prominent political figures, then go on TV and brag about their feats, expecting a bump in the polls. As for Israelis, they're clearly even more bloodthirsty than we are. But we should all drop whatever we're doing and condemn some guy who fails to empathize with people who are furthering genocide?
We're fortunate so far that few people who oppose what Israel has been doing view its architects and enablers and fair-weather friends with anything remotely resembling the fear, loathing, and malice Israel has mustered. That's especially true in America, where so few of us are directly impacted, leaving us free to moralize as we may. But human nature suggests such luck won't hold. The longer this war, which is purely a matter of Netanyahu's choice, goes on, the more desperate become, the more despicable Israelis will appear, the more the violence they've unleashed, the more hatred will wash back on them. And when it does, sure, decry and lament those who fight back and their victims, but never forget who started this, who sustained it, and who could have stopped it at any point and started to make amends. (And surely I don't need to add that the bomb started ticking long before Oct. 7.)
John McWhorter: [04-23] I'm a Columbia professor. The protests on my campus are not justice. For another example of how the NY Times is doing its duty for Israel, they dug up this op-ed, from the extremely disingenuous author of Woke Racism: How a New Religion Has Betrayed Black America.
James Schamus: [04-23] A note to fellow Columbia faculty on the current panic: "The current 'antisemitism panic' at Columbia University is manufactured hysteria weaponized to quell legitimate political speech on campus and give cover to the larger project of ethnic cleansing in the West Bank and, now, of course, Gaza."
Bill Scher: [04-25] The divestment encampments don't make any sense: "The demand that universities unload any investments having to do with Israel is half-baked and bound to fail." Really? Granted, the investment money at stake isn't enough to cause Israel to flinch, but the very idea that anyone -- much less elite institutions in Israel's most loyal ally -- would choose to dissociate itself from Israel on moral grounds is likely to sow doubt elsewhere. Otherwise, why would Israelis go into such a tizzy any time they hear "BDS"? But more importantly, divestment is a direct tie between the university and Israel, and one that can be discretely severed by university administrators who discover that doing so is in their best interest. Divestment gives protesters a tangible demand, and it is one that universities can easily afford, so it offers a chance for a win. Moreover, the dynamic is pretty easy to understand, because we've done this sort of thing before. The odds of success here are much better than anything you might get from trying to lobby your representative, or for boycotting a store that sells Israeli hummus. Also, this shows that students are still organizable (and on long-term, relatively altruistic grounds), probably more so than any other segment of society, despite generally successful efforts to reduce higher education to crass carreerism. Despite the dumb pitch, the article's back story on South Africa gives me hope. Sure, this generation of Israeli leaders is more Botha than De Klerk, but so was De Klerk until he realized that a better path was possible. That's going to be harder with Israel, mostly because they still think that what they're doing is working. The protests show otherwise, and the more successful they are, the better for everyone.
[PS: Per this tweet, the philosophy department chair at Emory University says, "Students are the conscience of our culture."]
Matt Stieb/Chas Danner: [04-28] University protests: the latest at colleges beyond Columbia.
More on the Israel's propaganda front, struggling as ever to mute and suppress the world's horror at the genocide in Gaza and to Israel's escalation elsewhere from apartheid to state/vigilante terror.
Michael Arria:
Zack Beauchamp: [04-16] Tucker Carlson went after Israel -- and his fellow conservatives are furious: "Carlson mainstreamed antisemitism for a long time, and conservatives seemed not to care. Then he set his sights on Israel." When it comes to dunking on Carlson, I don't much care who does it:
Daniel Beaumont: [04-26] The Big Bang: Israel's path to self-destruction.
M Reza Benham: [04-26] Manipulation politics: Israeli gaslighting in the United States: "A country does not become cruel overnight. It takes intent, years of practice and strategies to effectively hide the cruelty." Dozens of examples follow, especially on Israel's master of American politicians. "Israeli gaslighting has reached into and exerted influence in almost every segment of American society. Consequently, Israel has grown into an entity unbound by borders, exempt from international law and able to commit genocide with impunity." Also note: "And while Israel continues its intense bombing in Gaza, Biden signed legislation on 24 April allocating another $26.4 billion for Tel Aviv to continue its atrocities."
Ronen Bregman/Patrick Kingsley: [04-28] Israeli officials believe ICC is preparing arrest warrants over war: "The Israeli and foreign officials also believe the court is weighing arrest warrants for leaders from Hamas." That would be consistent with past efforts to charge both sides with war crimes, but it opens up an interesting possibility, which would be for Hamas leaders to surrender to the ICC for trial, which would presumably protect them from Israeli assassination, and would largely satisfy Israel's demands that Hamas's leadership in Gaza be dismantled. It would also give them a chance to defend themselves in public court, where they could make lots of interesting cases. It would show respect for international law, even if it demands sacrifice. And it would put Israel on the spot to do the same. I'd like to see that.
Jonathan Chait: [04-17] Conservatives suddenly realize Tucker Carlson is a lying Russian dupe: "What changed?" I don't quite buy the idea that Carlson is a "Russian dupe" but he has so little redeeming social value that I don't care what you call him. Still, you have to wonder, when Israel starts losing the antisemites, what will they have left?
Jonathan Cook: [04-26] How an 'antisemitism hoax' drowned out the discovery of mass graves in Gaza.
Dave DeCamp:
[04-24] Biden claims $95 billion foreign military aid bill is good for 'world peace'. Caitlin Johnstone linked to this piece as: "[Biden] signed the World War 3 bill."
[04-24] Netanyahu calls for crackdown on pro-Palestine protesters in the US. Quotes him: "We see this exponential rise of antisemitism throughout America and throughout Western societies as Israel tries to defend itself against genocidal terrorists, genocidal terrorists who hide behind civilians." So, like, his plan is working?
[04-25] Hamas official says group willing to disarm for two-state solution. I'm not sure they even have a "military wing" left, or any political legitimacy if democracy should ever be availed in Gaza, but the offer is not inconsistent with their position since 2006, when they did at least still exist, and had some popular support. However, Israel has never had any serious interest in a two-state solution, and now less than ever as they still have hopes of killing and/or expelling all Palestinians.
Connor Echols: [04-24] Israel violating US and international law, ex officials say: "An independent task force has given a detailed report of alleged Israeli war crimes to the Biden administration."
Thomas L Friedman:
[04-26] Israel has a choice to make: Rafah or Riyadh: I suspect that most Israelis regard Friedman as nothing more than a "useful idiot," which is to say he's useful when he says what he's supposed to -- as when he repeated their "six front" theory in an attempt to entice Biden into launching a war of distraction with Iran -- and an idiot when he tries to think for himself and to offer them advice. [Cue famous Moshe Dayan quote.] This is an example of the latter, though you can hardly blame Friedman, since this is based on things he was told to think. Some day the relevant secrets will be revealed, and we'll all have a good laugh over how Trump and Biden got played over the Abraham Accords -- or how Kushner played everyone, since he wound up with billions of Saudi money for a deal that never had to happen. Israel never cared the least bit for any of them, but went along with Qatar and Morocco because they were totally harmless deals that cost them nothing and helped manipulate the Americans (much like their phony war with Iran, which the deals propose to turn into some grand alliance).
The Saudis couldn't quite stoop that low because they still have some self-respect -- they are, after all, the trustees of Mecca and Medina -- but strung Kushner along with cash, and more generally the Americans with potentially lucrative arms deals. But if Friedman's choice is real, Israel would much rather demolish the last Palestinian city in Gaza, rendering it uninhabitable for whoever manages not to be killed in the process, than have a chance to play footsie with the decadent but despised Saudis. But they may also suspect it isn't really real, because it's always been so easy to manipulate the Americans and their Arab friends, who've always proved eager to accommodate whatever Israel wants.
[04-16] How to be pro-Palestinian, pro-Israeli and pro-Iranian. While the title suggests that Friedman might be capable of thinking creatively, searching out some kind of mutually beneficial win-win-win solution, pinch yourself. By "pro-Iranian" he means anti-Ayatollah, which is to say he's no more prepared to deal with the real Iran than Netanyahu and Biden are. And by "pro-Palestinian" he means totally domesticated under a fully compliant Palestinian Authority, as separate-and-unequal as any imaginary reservation. Sure, by "pro-Israeli" he probably means free of Netanyahu, but he'd be less of a stickler on that point.
Binoy Kampmark: [04-28] Israel's anti-UNRWA campaign falls flat.
Naomi Klein: [04-24] We need an exodus from Zionism: "This Passover, we don't need or want the false idol of Zionism. We want freedom from the project that commits genocide in our name." Klein spoke at a Passover seder in Brooklyn:
Nina Lakhani: [04-24] 'Not like other passovers': hundreds of Jewish demonstrators arrested after New York protest seder.
H Scott Prosterman:
[04-26] Zionism's expired shelf-life: Why Naomi Klein is right that it has become Pharaoh. Author previously wrote the still relevant:
[2023-11-05] Far rightwing Israeli gov't's actions risk fueling global anti-semitism while Republicans stoke Islamophobia.
Alan J Kuperman: [04-16] Civilian deaths in Gaza rival those of Darfur -- which the US called a 'genocide'.
Judith Levine: [04-25] Why we need to stop using 'pro-Palestine' and 'pro-Israel': "The safety and security of Palestinians and Jews are interdependent, so we should use language carefully." Good luck with that. I know I try to be precise and respectful in my terminology, but it's always a struggle: we are necessarily talking about groups of people, despite every grouping, whether self- or other-identified, having exceptions and individual variations that undermine every attempt to generalize. At some point, you have to concede the impossibility of the task, and admit not just that the terms are imprecise but that we shouldn't put so much weight on them.
I've considered writing an article on this: "Why I've never called myself 'pro-Palestinian,' but I don't care if you do." Part of what I feel here is that Palestinian nationalist groups, even ones nominally on the left, have a sorry history of ambition and exclusion which I've never approved of in principle, and have found to be counterproductive politically. But mostly, I don't trust any nationalism, even one that would presume to include me among the elect. (Although I've found that people who would divide us into nations will continue to subdivide so that only their own clique comes out on top, which somehow never saw me as fit for their supremacy.)
On the other hand, I've never doubted that Palestinians should enjoy the same human rights as everyone else, provided they accord the same rights to others. But most people who describe themselves as pro-Palestinian believe exactly that. Their self-label is meant to convey solidarity with people they rightly see as oppressed, people they hope to advance not to dominance but to equal rights. I don't think that this is the clearest way of expressing their support, but who am I to object to such tactical quibbles? I felt much the same way when Stokely Carmichael started talking about Black Power. Sure, like all power, that could be abused, but for now the deficit was so great one had little to worry about. And the trust expressed would only help to build the solidarity the movement needed.
By the way, see the Robert Wright article below for a story along these lines, where Norman Finkelstein suggests that when saying "From the river to the sea," it would be clearer and safer to say "Palestinians" will be free" instead of "Palestine." That makes sense to me, but as Wright noted, he was immediately followed by another speaker, who repeated the standard line and got bigger applause. I could see giving up after that, but isn't that the worst of all scenarios?
Sania Mahyou: [04-26] Inside the first French university encampment for Palestine at Sciences Po Paris.
Stefan Moore: [04-23] Israel's architect of ethnic cleansing: "The spectre of Yosef Weitz lives on." Now there's a name I know, but haven't heard of in a while. Weitz was head of the Land Settlement Department for the Jewish National Fund, which was the Zionist entity charged with buying up parcels of Palestinian land as Jewish immigrants sought to take over the country. In 1937, after the Peel Commission recommended that Palestine be partitioned with forced transfer, Weitz became head of the Jewish Agency's Population Transfer Committee, so he was the original bureaucratic planner of what became the Nakba.
Colleen Murrell: [04-26] How the Israeli government manages to censor the journalists covering the war on Gaza.
James North: [04-15] A secret internal 'NYTimes' memo reveals the paper's anti-Palestinian bias is even worse than we thought. North has been documenting reporting bias and outright propaganda in the NY Times long enough he can't possibly be as surprised, let alone shocked, as says. NY Times, regardless of pretensions to high-minded objectivity, has always been a party-line organ. Still, it's nice to be able to see explicit directions and reasoning on terminology, rather than just having to sniff out the distortions. For more on this, see the original leak story, and more:
Jeremy Scahill/Ryan Grim: [04-15] Leaked NYT Gaza memo tells journalists to avoid words "genocide," "ethnic cleansing," and "occupied territory": "Amid the internal battle over the New York Times's coverage of Israel's war, top editors handed down a set of directives."
Mohamad Elmasry: [04-24] Why the leaked New York TImes Gaza memo is just the tip of the iceberg.
Writers Against the War on Gaza: [04-27] How the New York Times fights America's wars: "The New York Times is not an unbiased fount of information, but a sophisticated ideological weapon. Our goal is to unmask the Times and expose the paper for what it is: a tool of empire encased in a liberal veneer."
Kareena Pannu: [04-17] How the UK media devalues Palestinian lives: "The UK media's coverage of the killing of World Central Kitchen workers shows how much Palestinian life is devalued."
Vijay Prashad: [04-24] Elites afraid to talk about Palestine: "The Western political class has used all tools at its disposal to support Israel's genocide while criminalizing solidarity."
Fadi Quran/Fathi Nimer/Tariq Kenney-Shawa/Yawa Hawari: [04-17] Palestinian perspectives on escalating Iran-Israel relations. Many interesting points here; e.g., from Kenney-Shawa:
Iran's highly-choreographed attack achieved exactly what it intended, gaining valuable intel on Israeli, American, and regional air defense capabilities, costing Israel and its US benefactors over $1 billion in a single night, proving Israel's dependency on the US, and further eroding Israel's image of military invincibility. In doing so, Iran also sent a clear message that its drones and missiles could cause significantly more damage if launched without warning, while still preserving a window for de-escalation.
Also, from Hawari:
For Netanyahu, picking a fight with Iran was the only thing that could save him from near-certain political demise. As the Gaza genocide rages on, the Israeli military remains unable to secure its stated objective: the eradication of Hamas and the return of the hostages. This, in addition to the fact that he faces major corruption charges and overwhelming domestic opposition to his leadership, makes Netanyahu at his most dangerous.
The Israeli prime minister has, for years, built his political career on arousing fear of Iran and its nuclear capabilities among the Israeli public. Internationally, the Israeli regime has long positioned itself as a Western bulwark against Iran and tied its security to that of Western civilization itself. Netanyahu has also exploited Palestine-Iran relations to justify Israel's continued oppression of the Palestinian people as a whole. This is a narrative that has particularly taken hold during since the start of the current genocide.
This was published by Al-Shabaka, which bills itself as "the Palestinian Policy Network." Some other recent posts:
Yara Hawari: [04-03] The Gaza genocide in western media: Culprits of complicity.
Hamza Ali Shah: [04-28] We need to talk about the pro-Israel lobby in the UK.
Tariq Kenney-Shawa: [03-12] Israel's disinformation apparatus: A key weapon in its arsenal.
Samia al-Botmeh/Basil Farraj/Fathi Nimer/Abdaljawad Omar: [02-20] The West Bank: Settler colonial spillover of the Gaza genocide.
[2023-10-24] Grounding the current moment: An Al-Shabaka syllabus; also: Grounding the Gaza genocide: "Al-Shabaka has compiled a collection of its past works that may serve to ground readers in the wider context of this current moment."
Balakrishnan Rajagopal: [01-29] Domicide: The mass destruction of homes should be a crime against humanity.
Jodi Rudoren: [04-05] Why an immediate ceasefire is a moral imperative -- and the best thing for Israel. Editor-in-chief of Forward, she's made some progress since her October 9, 2023 column, where she wrote: "The coming days and weeks will be awful. Israel has no good options." I don't mean to rub it in, but there was one good option back then. Give her credit for finding it eventually. Too many others are still pretending they can't do otherwise.
Robert Tait: [04-27] Sanders hits back at Netanyahu: 'It is not antisemitic to hold you accountable'. His own piece:
Bernie Sanders: [04-26] No, Mr. Netanyahu, it's not anti-semitic to criticize the Israeli government's war.
Philip Weiss:
[04-14] Weekly Briefing: Establishment voices express fear of a rogue Israel: "Israel's indifference to international law is destabilizing the Middle East, even establishment voices say. The head of the Center for American Progress, a Democratic Party thinktank, says Israel is not a democracy and peace will only be possible if Palestinians have equal rights."
[04-20] Zionism must be exposed and discredited: "Zionism threatens political freedom in the United States and international order. There is only one way to fight this ideology. Those who oppose it must explain the truth to Americans: Zionism is racist."
[04-21] Weekly Briefing: At Passover, the Jewish community must break up over genocide.
[04-28] Weekly Briefing: 'Thank God for the students':
The student uprisings against Israeli genocide are a stunning new force in U.S., representing a mass movement that demands that our politicians cease to sideline Palestinian human rights. "Edward Said once said, 'thank God for the students.' I just want to echo those words from this tortured place," Susan Abulhawa said from Gaza.
Robert Wright: [04-26] This feels like Vietnam: I mentioned this piece under Levine above, for its discussion of language. The analogy to the Vietnam War protests has been noted elsewhere but is still has a long ways to go:
The last two weeks have been more reminiscent of the Vietnam War era than any two weeks since . . . the Vietnam War era. After the mass arrest of students at Columbia University failed to squelch their anti-war protest encampment, the attendant publicity helped inspire protests, and encampments, at campuses across the country.
We're nowhere near peak Vietnam. As someone old enough to dimly remember the protests of the late 1960s (if not old enough to have participated in them), I can assure you that college students are capable of getting way more unruly than college students have gotten lately.
I can't do this subject justice here, so will limit myself to two points. One is that thanks to the AIPAC-dominated political culture in Washington, both parties are totally aligned with Israel, although few in either party did so from core beliefs. This matters little on the Republican side (where core beliefs tend to be racist, violent, and repressive), but leave Democrats more open to doubt and persuasion. Lacking any better political base, that's what demonstrations are good for, and why there's hope they may be effective. It's also worth noting that Occupy Wall Street, which was pretty explicitly anti-Obama but not in any way that could benefit the Republicans, had at least two major successes: one was popularizing the "1%" line to highlight inequality; the other was in making student debt relief a tangible political issue -- one that Biden has finally embraced.
The other point is that it will be important both to the protesters and to the Democrats to keep the demonstrations focused and not allow the sort of descent into chaos that Republicans exploited with Vietnam. (And which, as we've already seen with Abbott in Texas, and with the recent anti-BLM police riots, they are super-psyched to exacerbate now.) I'm reminded here of Ben-Gurion's famous "we will fight the White Paper as if there is no war, and fight the war as if there is no White Paper." His tact allowed him to win both fights, which is to say he fared much better than Johnson and Daley did in 1968.
Needless to say, there will be more pieces like this coming our way:
Melvin Goodman: [04-26] The years 1968 and 2024: Will history repeat itself?
Nicole Narea: [04-27] How today's antiwar protests stack up against major student movements in history.
Dave Zirin: [04-26] How the US media failed to tell the story of the occupation of Palestine: Interview with Sut Jhally.
PS: For some reason I no longer recall, I happened to have had a tab open to a piece from Spiked, so I took a look at their home page. It seems to be a right-wing UK site -- Wikipedia traces its roots to "Living Marxism," but also also notes support from Charles Koch -- but whatever it's clearly in the bag for Israel now, with articles on: "Iran, not Israel, is escalating this war"; "Is it now a crime to be a Jew in London?"; "Hamas apologism has taken Australia by storm"; "The Islamo-left must be confronted"; as well as a lot of articles about "gender ideology" and "woke capitalism" and one on "Why humanity is good for the natural world." Right-wingers seem to be inexorably drawn to Israel.
America's increasingly desperate and pathetic empire:
Bob Dreyfuss: [04-23] Handling -- and mishandling -- the Iran nuclear program: "Trump blew up the deal, can Biden still fix it?" It's pretty obvious that Biden could fix it, and that he could go much farther in normalizing relations with Iran, but to do so he first has to realize that America has an interest in peace and cooperation beyond his current practice of subservience to whatever Israel's ultra-right-wing government wants.
Connor Echols:
[04-18] Blinken ignores State recommendations to sanction Isareli units.
[03-13] Bombs, guns, treasure: What Israel wants, the US gives: No questions asked, least of all about "alleged human rights abuses."
John Feffer: [04-19] Haiti today, America tomorrow? "When democracies die, mobs take over."
Maha Hilal: [04-25] The torture that just won't end: "Torture, Abu Ghraib, and the legacy of the US war on Iraq."
John Hudson: [04-19] US agrees to withdraw American troops from Niger.
John Ismay/Edward Wong/Pablo Robles: [04-26] A new Pacific arsenal to counter China: "With missiles, submarines and alliances, the Biden administration has built a presence in the region to rein in Beijing's expansionist goals." But China's the "expansionist" one?
Dee Knight: [04-26] War bucks prevent peace in Ukraine, Gaza & China: I could see an argument that the arms for Ukraine could be leverage for a much-needed peace deal, but that would require some willingness from Biden to consider such a thing. The China piece isn't large enough to make any difference, so I figure it's just graft, but a serious escalation there, which any extra arms points toward, would be much more expensive and much more dangerous than the current standoff with Russia. As for Israel, there is no threat to defend against, nor anyone that Israel is willing to negotiate with. This simply says the US wants to be remembered as a partner in your genocide. Sort of like Mussolini joining the Axis.
Maya Krainc:
[04-19] Making fair elections a condition for easing sanctions is wrong: "Venezuelan president Nicolás Maduro broke a deal with Washington, but economic coercion is not going to make things better."
[04-24] Russia, China dump the dollar as Moscow announces new trade corridors: "The Kremlin is looking to reshape global commerce in an effort to dodge Western sanctions."
Nicky Reid: [04-26] The last thing Haiti needs is your liberal guilt.
Alex Thurston: [04-26] Americans go home: Both Niger and Chad yank the welcome mat.
Caitlin Vogus: [04-16] The US isn't just reauthorizing its surveillance laws -- it's vastly expanding them. FISA returns, stronger than ever. More:
Luke Goldstein: [04-12] Reformers narrowly lose on FISA reform, now get Patriot Act 2.0.
Li Zhou: [04-24] Congress's $95 billion Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan aid package, explained: "The bill provides billions in foreign aid and could force ByteDance to sell TikTok."
Election notes:
Perry Bacon Jr: [04-10] The three kinds of swing voters -- and why they aren't with Trump or Biden: Those who swing between R and D; those who swing between voting and not; those who swing between third parties and majors.
Nandika Chatterjee: [04-22] New poll shows RFK Jr's campaign could sink Trump: Don't put much stock in this, but he has zero credibility among Democrats -- even those who see him as preferable on war would rather go with Stein or West -- and his key issues appeal to credulous voters who Trump needs (e.g., on vaccines, Kennedy is much more committed than Trump is), as is his focus on trashing Biden (which shows he understands rage as a motivator). He also has that famous-rich-outsider vibe that Trump had in 2016 (somewhat tarnished now). And if he does sink Trump, I could see him running as a Republican in 2028. He wouldn't be the favorite, but I could see him having some impact in the primaries. That also leads us to:
Nicholas Liu: [04-24] Trouble for Trump? Nikki Haley wins 156,000 votes in closed Pennsylvania primary: She's running better than when she was a candidate.
Doug Sosnik: [04-16] Why Biden has a narrower path to the presidency than Trump, in 11 maps.
Trump, and other Republicans: Trump's New York porn-star hush-money trial has started, so let's go there first:
Abdullah Fayyad: [04-19] Trump's jury doesn't have to like him to be fair to him.
Catherina Gioino: [04-27] 5 key takeaways from tabloid boss David Pecker's Trump trial testimony.
Margaret Hartmann:
Elie Honig: [04-26] Donald Trump is a special kind of courtroom-discipline problem.
Brian Karem: [04-18] The ripple effects of Drowsy Don beyond the courtroom: The Trump trial is making everything weirder.
Nicholas Liu:
[04-24] Trump falsely claims police are preventing "thousands" of people from protesting his trial.
[04-25] Pecker says Trump was worried about election "impact" of alleged affairs. One part of the story few people seem to be focusing on is the timing: what would have happened had Stormy Daniels' story hit the presses, especially in the last few weeks before the 2016 election?
[04-25] The president could "assassinate" political rivals and still enjoy total immunity, Trump lawyer says.
Heather Digby Parton: [04-26] Trump's sordid hush-money defense: Tales from his sleazy past could hurt him doubly: "Trump's squalid character seems to be a selling point."
Charles P Pierce: [04-19] A man set himself on fire outside the Trump trial. I dread what comes next. "Our politics have become deranged, and the former president* is the person most responsible for this fact." For more details (not that they help much, see:
Intelligencer Staff: [04-20] Man who self-immolated near Trump dies: How it happened.
Andrew Prokop:
[04-15] How Trump's hush money trial went from an afterthought to the main event.
[04-25] The wild past 24 hours of Trump legal news, explained: "Trump allies newly indicted in Arizona, testimony continuing in New York, and the Supreme Court hearing arguments in DC."
Alex Shephard: The utter joy of watching Trump watch people who despise him: "In his hush-money criminal trial, the former president is coming face to face with potential jurors who have expressed unvarnished opinions of him on social media."
David Smith: [04-27] How the Trump trial is playing in Maga world: sublime indifference, collective shrug.
Stuart Stevens: [04-25] Being stuck in a courtroom is just what Trump needed: Republican Party operative with an anti-Trump book under his belt, so no reason for anyone to trust him, but this much rings true: "The Trump campaign is not about persuasion. It's about stirring up anger inside every possible Trump supporter so that voting is a righteous act of fury, not a mere civic duty." Not noted is how the trial also lets him play for the pity vote. Also that he has a history of miraculously rising in the polls when his campaign cuts back on his exposure, as when they took his Twitter account hostage in the final days of the 2016 race.
Margaret Sullivan: [04-24] Trump's hush-money case might finally show him what accountability feels like: Dream on. The only way he can parse this trial (or any of his trials) is as political persecution, not because he believes he's innocent -- he's never been charged with anything he hasn't already bragged about -- but because he knows that if he were a prosecutor, that's how he'd go after his enemies. As for what other people might think, either they already do, or they don't.
More Republicans in the news (including more Trumps):
Jess Bidgood: [04-24] Trump respects women, most men say: A "majority" (54%), as compared to a somewhat lesser number of women who think that (31%). Is this news? Or just clickbait meant to be laughed at?
Luke Broadwater: [04-17] Senate dismisses impeachment charges against Mayorkas without a trial: That didn't take long, although you can't give Republicans any credit, as only Murkowski among them voted to dismiss.
Li Zhou: [04-17] The very short Mayorkas impeachment trial, explained.
Jonathan Chait:
[04-18] Why a second Trump term will make the middle class pay: "No more low-interest-rate free ride." I don't quite buy this. Republicans have an uncanny knack for sandbagging the economy, which is what drives the Fed to cut rates. Well, that and having Republicans in office to save. After all, Powell is still Trump's guy -- four of the last five Fed chairs Democrats have nominated were originally appointed by Republicans.
[04-19] Lara Trump threatens 'four years of scorched earth' if Trump retakes power: "Sounds like a fun time for America." No more mister nice guy, I guess. Funny that when I first saw this head, I read it as a threat to terrorize America if Trump wasn't allowed to win.
[04-26] Trump second-term plan includes Federal Reserve coup: "The next Trump administration will be far more chaotic."
Nandika Chatterjee:
Eli Clifton: [04-24] TikTok investor Jeff Yass wants to shape US foreign policy too: "The GOP mega-donor has been quietly sending millions to anti-Muslim orgs and hawkish pro-Israel groups."
Gail Collins: [2018-10-17] The horseface chronicles. Not a new column, but making the rounds again.
Michelle Cottle: [04-15] What I found inside the MAGAverse on the eve of Trump's trial.
Chauncey DeVega: [04-16] Trump has "reprogrammed a generation" to fight against democracy: "Former Trump aide Miles Taylor: 'The risk of political violence is high' -- no matter who wins this election."
Griffin Eckstein:
[04-24] Trump and Giuliani named unindicted co-conspirators in Michigan fake elector plot: Once again (cf. Arizona), Trump gets away unscathed while his underlings go down. Still, little doubt about who they're going down for, and why.
[04-24] Trump's sons will head up the transition team's effort to find loyal government officials.
Francesca Fiorentini: [03-29] Handmaids to the patriarchy: "Republicans offer a lesson in how not wo win women back to their party."
Margaret Hartmann: [04-17] Trump is still fuming over Kimmel mocking him at the Oscars: Fave quip here: "Isn't it past your jail time?"
Thom Hartmann: How conservative policies and rhetoric kill people.
Howard Manly: [04-18] 5 years after Mueller report into pro-Trump Russian meddling, legal scholars still have questions: E.g., "why didn't the full report become public?"
Ben Metzner: New evidence shows Matt Gaetz might be skeezier than we thought,
Walter G Moss: [2020-02-16] Why Trump is different than Reagan, either Bush, Dole, McCain, or Romney -- he's evil: Not sure why I landed on this old piece, except perhaps it's still relevant?
Will Norris: [04-23] Trump vows to crush the civil service, but he's not the first president to try: "Republican presidents have been trying to politicize the federal bureaucracy for decades."
Martin Pengelly: [04-26] Trump VP contender Kristi Noem writes of killing dog -- and goat -- in new book: "We love animals, but tough decisions like this happen all the time on a farm." Then she moved on to the horses. There's much more reaction to this story, but this should suffice:
Jeremy Childs: [04-28] Kristi Noem doubles down on story about killing her dog from memoir.
Margaret Hartmann: [04-28] Kristi Noem killed her dog. Why is she telling us this?
Nathaniel Sher: [04-19] House China hawk lights a match on his way out the door: "Retiring Rep Mike Gallagher led the committee targeting the Chinese Communist Party and is now calling for a 'new cold war'."
Matthew Stevenson: [04-19] Wall Street Don deals more liar's poker.
Biden and/or the Democrats:
Charles M Blow: [04-17] The Kamala Harris moment has arrived.
Gerard Edic: [04-23] Why is the Biden administration completing so many regulations? "The answer is the Congressional Review Act, which Republicans in a second Tumpp presidency could use to further attack the administrative state. Finalizing rules early protects them from this fate."
Jordan Haedtler/Kenny Stancil: [04-16] Democrats must start to distinguish themselves on insurance policy: "Amid a crisis for homeowners, Democrats have done little while Republicans pursue an agenda of bailouts and deregulation." I think, and not just due to climate change, insurance will become the number one political issue in America, as private industry is no longer able to charge enough to cover the necessary payouts (and still make the profits they expect).
Ed Kilgore: [03-18] This year's Democratic Convention won't be a replay of 1968: Didn't I say as much last week?
Paul Krugman:
[04-09] Stumbling into Goldilocks.
[04-23] Ukraine aid in the light of history: Compares the current vote to Lend-Lease in 1941, which most Republicans opposed before Pearl Harbor rallied them to war. Doesn't allow that they might have had good reasons for doing so, and accepts uncritically that Lend-Lease proved to be the right thing to do in 1941, implying that reasons then and there are still valid here and now. That case is pretty weak on almost every account, not that history between such unlike cases offers much guidance anyway.
[04-25] Can Biden revive the fortunes of American workers?: "He's the most pro-labor president since Harry Truman." I had to laugh at that one. Truman was very anti-union after the war ended in 1945, and his threats against strikers probably contributed to the debacle of 1946, which gave Republicans a majority in Congress, which (with racist southern Democrats) they used to pass Taft-Hartley over his veto. He recovered a bit after that, but no subsequent Democat made any serious efforts -- even when Johnson seemed to have a favorable Congress -- to reverse the damage. I'm not sure Krugman is technically wrong, but he's talking about slim margins at both ends.
Harold Meyerson: [04-15] Biden's Gaza policy could create a replay of Chicago '68: If Israel is still committing genocide in Gaza, Biden will certainly face (and deserve) protests, but will Chicago police riot again? -- that was, after all, the real story in 1968, and much of the blame there goes directly to Mayor Richard Daley.
Ahmed Moor: [04-17] As a Palestinian American, I can't vote for Joe Biden any more. And I am not alone: "The president's moral failure in Gaza has taken on historic proportions, like Lyndon Johnson's in Vietnam before him." I understand the sentiment, and I think Biden's team should take the threat of defections like this one -- and it's not just Palestinians who are thinking like that -- and get their act together. But come November, no one's just pro-Palestinian or pro-Israeli or any other single thing. Politics is complicated, and ideal choices are hard to come by.
Timothy Noah: Yes, Joe Biden can win the working-class vote.
David Smith: [04-28] 'Stormy weather': Biden skewers Trump at White House correspondents' dinner: One of the few favorable things I had to say about Trump's presidency is that he sidelined this annual charade of chumminess. And it's not like the White House press has been doing Biden many favors over the last three years. But I guess the material writers came up with this year was too good to miss?
Hershal Pandya: [04-28] Colin Jost's best jokes at the 2024 White House Correspondents' Dinner.
Legal matters and other crimes:
Irin Carmon: [04-25] What it means that Weinstein's conviction was reversed. Well, one of them. He still has a cell waiting in California.
Rachel M Cohen: [04-21] What the Supreme Court case on tent encampments could mean for homeless people.
Hassan Ali Kanu: [04-15] America's Fifth Circuit problem: "Judges are now fighting over the right to hear important policy cases."
Jason Linkins: So, what's going on with Clarence Thomas these days?
Ian Millhiser: A couple very busy weeks at the Supreme Court:
[04-15] The Supreme Court effectively abolishes the right to mass protest in three US states: "It's no longer safe to organize a protest in Louisiana, Mississippi, or Texas." Those three states were subject to a ruling by the Fifth Circuit Court, which the Supreme Court declined to review, despite that ruling clearly deviating from previous Supreme Court rulings.
[04-15] The Supreme Court's confusing new anti-trans decision, explained: "The Court mostly reinstates Idaho's ban on transgender health care for children."
[04-16] January 6 insurrectionists had a great day in the Supreme Court today: "Most of the justices seem to want to make it harder to prosecute January 6 rioters." Evidently, some Supreme Court justices have wavering views: "If nothing else, this is a terrible look for the Supreme Court. And it suggests that many of the justices' concerns about free speech depend on whether they agree with the political views of the speaker."
[04-17] The Supreme Court case that could turn homelessness into a crime, explained: "Grants Pass v. Johnson could make the entire criminal justice system far crueler. It also tests the limits of judicial power."
[04-22] Donald Trump already won the only Supreme Court fight that mattered: "This case is about delaying his trial, and the GOP-controlled Supreme Court has given him everything he could reasonably hope for and more."
[04-24] The Supreme Court's likely to make it more dangerous to be pregnant in a red state: "But it's not yet clear they've settled on a rationale for doing so."
[04-24] A new Supreme Court case seeks to make it much easier for criminals to buy guns: "The fight over 'ghost guns' is back before the justices."
[04-25] How the Supreme Court weaponizes its own calendar: "The justices already effectively gave Trump what he wants in his Supreme Court immunity case."
[04-25] Donald Trump had a fantastic day in the Supreme Court today: "It's unclear if the Court will explicitly hold that Trump could commit crimes with impunity, or if they'll just delay his trial so long that it doesn't matter."
Nicole Narea: [04-18] The history of Arizona's Civil War-era abortion ban: "How conspiring doctors, questionable tonics, and twisted patriotism led to the 1864 Arizona abortion ban that was recently upheld in court."
Jeffrey St Clair: [04-26] Witch trial in Oklahoma: How the prosecutorial slut-shaming of Brenda Andrew put her on death row.
Michael Tomasky: Samuel Alito's resentment goes full tilt on a black day for the court.
Climate and environment:
Kate Aronoff: Climate change will cost $38 trillion a year. Who will pay for it?
Juan Cole: [04-16]
Playing Russian roulette with Middle Eastern oil. I could have
listed this elsewhere, according to the geopolitics, but this is
where the CO
Gabrielle Gurley: [04-26] Flint's never-ending water crisis and 'punishment nightmare'.
Heather Souvaine Horn: The UN is running out of time to draft this plastics treaty: "Meanwhile, it has yet to ban plastics industry lobbyists from the talks."
Benji Jones: [04-26] The end of coral reefs as we know them: "Years ago, scientists made a devastating prediction about the ocean. Now it's unfolding."
Frank Lingo: [04-18] We all know climate change is real. How did the US let it become a partisan debate? He notes the 55th anniversary of Earth Day, which in 1970 kicked off an impressive bipartisan effort, notably the Clean Air, Clean Water, and Endangered Species Acts, among other things creating the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Those acts led to dramatic improvements in water and air quality. But as those problems became less acute, many business interests decided on a full-press political campaign to protect and advance their profits by intense lobbying aimed at capturing government agencies and even discrediting the very idea of "public interest." By the time global warming became popularly identified as a serious environmental issue -- roughly 1990 -- right-wing anti-government, pro-market ideology had steamrolled both political parties, while the major wins of the 1970s had been normalized and their lessons forgotten. Having ginned up the right-wing propaganda machine to protect their right to pollute, it was inevitable that they'd fight concern over climate change, as they've continued to do. At this point, their success should scare themselves as much as anyone, but it's hard to give up on a con that still seems to be working.
Li Zhou: [04-27] We could be heading into the hottest summer of our lives.
Economic matters:
Dean Baker: Sure, read all of his pieces.
[04-15] Contrary to what you read in the NYT, mortgage rates are unlikely to stay where they are.
[04-16] The market is rigged to give all the money to the rich: the case of Covid boosters.
[04-17] In the good old days, one fourth of income went to food. Now it's down to 7.1 percent. Clothes and household furnishings are also down, though less dramatically. What's up in its place? Housing (whether you rent or borrow/own), and everything else that has come to be monopolized and/or financialized.
[04-17] Actually, the labor share has not been declining over the last seventy-five years.
[04-23] Noncompete clauses: markets are made, not given by nature.
[04-27] Bans on non-compete clauses benefit everyone: the case of veterinarians.
Jessica Corbett: [04-24] FTC bans noncompete clauses. This is very important, a prime example of why workers are better off with Biden. I got bullied into signing a noncompete once, and it left a very bitter taste, but I was one-in-five managers, not "1 out of every 4 private-sector workers" (as has become the case). The US Chamber of Commerce is suing not just to overturn the rule, but to abolish the FTC. I'm sure there's a judge in Texas who'd be happy to rule for them. For more, see Baker (above) and Dayen (below).
David Dayen:
[04-17] Our uniquely American drug shortages: "More drugs are in short supply than ever before. We've known the reason why for a long time: monopolistic middlemen."
[04-24] Challenge to fashion merger shows a new antitrust philosophy in action: "The bid to block a tie-up between two fashion conglomerates goes beyond consumer prices, and looks at market competition and labor harms."
[04-24] Plaintiff trying to reverse noncompete ban is Trump's tax adviser: G Brint Ryan.
Whizy Kim: [04-24] A unionized Volkswagen plant in Tennessee could mean big things for workers nationwide: Interview with Andrew Wolf.
Robert Kuttner: [04-16] Schumer carries water for crypto: "When it comes to backdoor schemes to help the financial industry, the frequently progressive Senate majority leader is still the senator from Wall Street."
Jeanne Whalen/Lauren Kaori Gurley: [04-19] Volkswagen workers in Tennessee pass historic vote to unionize.
Russia/Ukraine War:
Blaise Malley:
[04-19] Diplomacy Watch: How close were Russia and Ukraine to a deal in 2022? Mostly reviews a recent Foreign Policy piece on aborted negotiations shortly after Putin's invasion (below). Much of this has been previously reported, but few people involved seem to have learned much:
Samuel Charap/Sergey Radchenko: [04-16] The talks that could have ended the war in Ukraine: "A hidden history of diplomacy that came up short -- but holds lessons for future negotiations."
Branko Marcetic: [2023-12-04] Did the West deliberately prolong the Ukraine war?
Connor Echols: [2023-12-01] New revelations shed light on early talks.
Connor Echols: [2022-09-02] Did Boris Johnson help stop a peace deal in Ukraine?
Yaroslav Trofimov: [01-05] Did Ukraine miss an early chance to negotiate peace with Russia?
[04-26] Diplomacy Watch: Is new Ukraine aid a game changer? "New funding for weapons should help avoid disaster, but it likely won't be enough to win the war." If "winning the war" was already a vain hope, does adding more arms aid do anything but making losing more expensive? I'm not terribly disappointed that the Ukrainian portion of the "aid" bill passed, because I figure it can be used for negotiating a deal -- which has always been the only solution, but getting both sides to realize that they're otherwise stuck in a hopeless stalemate has been hard.
Thomas J Barfield: [04-15] Where did Vladimir Putin's dream of a 'Russian World' come from?
George Beebe: [04-25] Kicking the can down the crumbling road in Ukraine: "If Washington were intentionally to design a formula for Ukraine's destruction, it might look a lot like the aid package passed by Congress this week."
Matthew Blackburn: [04-22] ISW: Defeatist propaganda keeping 'us' from a Ukraine military victory: "The neo-con bred and led think tank is the most media referenced organization in town, and that's dangerous." The "Kagan industrial complex" crafts its Dolchstoßlegende.
Joshua Keating: [04-24] Ukraine is finally getting more US aid. It won't win the war -- but it can save them from defeat. This depends a lot on how you define defeat. Every day the war continues, they lose more (as do the Russians, as does everyone else involved).
Anatol Lieven: [04-25] Macron's strategy: A 'Gaullist' betrayal of de Gaulle: "If he is not careful, the French president is going to back himself into a dangerous little corner in Ukraine."
Greg Sargent: Mike Johnson's shockingly pro-Ukraine speech really sticks it to MAGA.
Around the world:
Zack Beauchamp: [04-26] Canada's polite Trumpism: "The rise of an unusually tame right-wing populist reveals how Canadian democracy stays strong." Also on Canada:
Amanda Llewellyn: [04-23] Can Canada stave off populism?
Rachel M Cohen: [04-24] How the overturn of Roe v. Wade sparked a new campaign for abortion rights across Europe.
Ishaan Tharoor: Washington Post foreign affairs columnist, almost always worth reading. These pieces could have been slotted in several hot spot areas.
[04-09] The fallacy of the 'West versus the rest' worldview.
[04-15] Sudan marks grim anniversary of civil war in shadow of other conflicts.
[04-16] Iran's escalation with Israel shifts focus away from Gaza.
[04-18] Russia's deadly attacks see Ukraine call out a Western double standard.
[04-19] As globalization unwinds, the world is still growing more unequal.
[02-23] Ukraine will get its US funding. but can that turn the tide?
[02-24] The US is in retreat in a crucial part of the world: Africa (Niger and Chad).
Taylor Swift: New album dropped, presumably a major event. I've been too busy to focus on it, but will get to it sooner or later.
Alex Abad-Santos: [04-19] It's impossible to be neutral about Taylor Swift.
Constance Grady: [04-19] Taylor Swift seems sick of being everyone's best friend.
Brad Luen: [04-28] Of muchness: Taylor Swift, The Tortured Poets Department.
Dave Moore: [04-19] How you get the world: Reflections on Taylor Swift, postscript 1.
Daniel Brown: [04-19] Oldest MLB player turns 100: Roomed with Yogi Berra, stymied Ted Williams: I clicked on this because I had to see who, after having noted the deaths of Carl Erskine (97) and Whitey Herzog (93) earlier in the week. And the answer is . . . Art Schallock! Not a name I recall, and I thought I knew them all (especially all the 1951-55 Yankees, although 1957 was the first year that actually stuck in my memory) Previous oldest MLB player was George Elder, and second oldest now is Bill Greason -- neither of them rings a bell either, but the next one sure does: Bobby Shantz!
Robert Christgau: [04-17] Xgau Sez: April, 2024: Perhaps because I'm disappointed I get so few questions my way, I thought I'd add a couple personal notes to his answers:
I haven't actually read more Marx than Bob admits to here (at least not much more, and virtually nothing since I shifted focus circa 1975), so like him I'd refer inquisitive readers to the now quite long and deep tradition -- although at this point I'm not exactly sure where I'd start. (I started with historians like Eugene Genovese, art critics like John Berger, and economists like Paul Sweezy, followed by a lot of Frankfurt School, especially Walter Benjamin.) But his recommendation of Marshall Berman's Adventures in Marxism has me intrigued, so I think I'll order a copy. I have, but have never read, Berman's All That Is Solid Melts Into Air, which came out after I lost interest (long story, that), but has always struck me as the probably closest analogue to the book I sometimes imagined writing on Marx (had my career gone that direction: working title was Secret Agents, after a Benjamin quip about Baudellaire). But I did read, and much admired, Berman's first book, The Politics of Authenticity: Radical Individualism and the Emergence of Modern Society, which gets us at least half way there. (By the way, while I largely blanked out on Marxism after 1975, I broke the ice recently with China Miéville's A Spectre Haunting, which was like meeting up with an old friend.)
Bob didn't search very hard for an answer to the question about "immediate astonishment" -- he checked off several 2023 records, then remembered two formative experiences from from sixty years earlier -- but had he consulted me, I could have reminded him of one: I was present when he opened and immediately played Marquee Moon, and I was even more impressed by the intensity of his reaction than I was by the music I was hearing. Although I had read much in the Voice about Television, I had never heard anything by them, so for me it took time to adjust.
For me, the most obvious answer was another record I first heard in Bob's apartment: Ornette Coleman's Dancing in Your Head, which was an even more obviously perfect title than The Shape of Jazz to Come. As for real early records, which for me started around 1963, everything I bought was already baited with singles I already loved, but the first album side I really got into was on my fourth purchase, Having a Rave-Up With the Yardbirds -- the hits were on the first side, but I came to like the raves on the second side even more (above all the cover of "Respectable"). But I couldn't tell you if that was "instantaneous." I did buy Sgt. Pepper when it came out, with much hype but no presold singles, and I quickly came to love it as much as anyone else did.
We didn't go to the 1994 Rhode Island festival, but Bob and Carola stayed with us in Boston before and after, so we were among the first to hear their unmediated reaction before it was sanitized for print. I've heard the Richie Havens dis so many times, both from Bob and from Laura Tillem, that I wondered whether they had shared the same traumatic concert experience, but she says not.
Tom Engelhardt: [04-21] A story of the decline and fall of it all. The editor-first, writer-as-the-occasion-arises, who has done more than anyone else over the last twenty years to help us realize that the American Empire is failing and floundering and never was all that useful let alone virtuous in the first place, has entered his 80s, feeling his own powers also dwindling, and growing more morose, as so many of us do. I'm tempted to quote large swathes of this article, but instead, let me do some editing (almost all his own words, but streamlined):
If Osama Bin Laden were still alive today, I suspect he would be pleased. He managed to outmaneuver and outplay what was then the greatest power on Planet Earth, drawing it into an endless war against "terrorism" and, in the process, turning it into an increasingly terrorized country, whose inhabitants are now at each other's throats.
As was true of the Soviet Union until almost the moment it collapsed in a heap, the U.S. still appears to be an imperial power of the first order. It has perhaps 750 military bases scattered around the globe and continues to act like a power of one on a planet that itself seems distinctly in crisis: a planet that itself looks as if it might be going to hell, amid record heat, fires, storms, and the like, while its leaders preoccupy themselves with organizing alliances and arming them for Armageddon.
It's strange to think about just how distant the America I grew up in -- the one that emerged from World War II as the global powerhouse -- now seems. Yet today, the greatest country on Earth (or so its leaders still like to believe), the one that continues to pour taxpayer dollars into a military funded like no other, or even combination of others, the one that has been unable to win any war of significance since 1945, seems to be coming apart at the seams, heading for a decline and fall almost beyond imagining.
I'm reminded here that Tom Carson, reviewing 1945 from the cusp of 2000, declared that the worst thing that ever happened to America was winning World War II. He might well have added that the second worst thing was the collapse of the Soviet Union: the essential ally in winning WWII, the opponent that allowed the Cold War to remain stable, and the void the US has spent thirty-plus years trying to fill in, and ultimately resurrect, with fantasies of imperial glory. I'd add that the third worst thing is the genocide in Gaza, where the Holocaust has returned in the form of America's spoiled, even more brattish and brutish Mini-Me.
Like Engelhardt, I've been fortunate to have lived my whole life in, and mostly conscious of, this arc. I'm a bit younger: I was born the week China entered the Korean War, ending the American advance and hopes of swift victory, so it was perhaps a bit easier for me to see that the remainder was all downhill. I was struck early on by the arrogance of power -- a familiar phrase even before William Fullbright used it as a book title -- and even earlier by the hypocrisy of the powerful. One of the first maxims I learned was "power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely." I was an introspective child, cursed with the ability to see deep into myself, and to approximate what others see, even over vast time and space. I was schizophrenic. I embraced radicalism, searching for roots, and found reason, a way of constructing frameworks for understanding. As a method, it was so incisive, so clear, so aware, that I had to put it aside for decades just to try to live a life, but it never left me, nor I it, as two decades of notebooks (most reorganized here) should attest.
Céline Gounder/Craig Spencer: [04-16] The decline in American life expectancy harms more than our health. Related:
Michael Hiltzik: [2023-04-05] America's decline in life expectancy speaks volumes about our problems. I may have cited this article before. The county map looks familiar. On a state level, lower average age of death lines up pretty close to Republican votes, although within those states, powerless Democratic enclaves (e.g., in Mississippi and South Dakota) are hit worst of all.
Constance Grady: [04-11] Why we never stopped talking about OJ Simpson.
John Herrman: [04-19] How product recommendations broke Google: "And ate the internet in the process." A long time ago, I put a fair amount of thought into what sort of aggregate information modeling might be possible with everyone having internet connections. Needless to say, nothing much that I anticipated actually happened, since business corruption crept into every facet of the process, making it impossible to ever trust anyone. It may look like the internet made us shallow and venal and paranoid, but that's mostly because those were the motivations of the people who rushed to take it over.
Jonathan Kandell: [04-19] Daniel C Dennett, widely read and fiercely debated philosopher, dies at 82: "Espousing his ideas in best sellers, he insisted that religion was an illusion, free will was a fantasy and evolution could only be explained by natural selection."
Whizy Kim: [04-17] Boeing's problems were as bad as you thought: "Experts and whistleblowers testified before Congress today. The upshot? "It was all about money."
Kelsey Piper: [04-19] Are there really more things going wrong on airplanes? Or, is it just Boeing?
Eric Levitz: I originally had these scattered about, but the sheer number and range suggested grouping them here.
[04-12] What the evidence really says about social media's impact on teens' mental health: "Did smartphones actually 'destroy' a generation?" Reviews Jonathan Haidt's book, The Anxious Generation: How the Great Rewiring of Childhood Is Causing an Epidemic of Mental Illness. Hard to say without not just having read the book but doing some extra evidence. Haidt seems like a guy who tries to look reasonable so he can sneak a conservative viewpoint in without it being dismissed out of hand. Levitz seems like a smart guy who's a bit too eager to split disputes down the middle. I suspect there are other factors at work that don't fit anyone's agenda.
[04-13] Don't sneer at white rural voters -- or delude yourself about their politics: "What the debate over "white rural rage" misses." Refers to the Tom Schaller/Paul Waldman book, White Rural Rage: The Threat to American Democracy, which has been much reviewed, including a piece cited here by Tyler Austin Harper: An utterly misleading book about rural America. Levitz makes good points, nicely summed up by subheds:
Further reading here:
Paul Waldman/Tom Schaller: An honest assessment of rural white resentment is long overdue: The authors strike back: "We say very clearly that rural America is hurting. But we refuse to justify attitudes that some scholars try to underplay."
[04-19] Tell the truth about Biden's economy: "Exaggering the harms of inflation doesn't help working people."
[04-23] The "feminist" case against having sex for fun: "American conservatives are cozying up to British feminists who argue that the sexual revolution has hurt women."
[04-24] Trump's team keeps promising to increase inflation: "Voters trust Trump to lower prices, even as his advisers put forward plans for increasing Americans' cost of living." Four steps:
Rick Perlstein:
[04-17] The implausible Mr Buckley: "A new PBS documentary whitewashes the conservative founder of National Review." Hard to imagine them rendering him even more white. Also on Buckley:
James Carden: [04-26] PBS on William F Buckley: Not quite getting it 'right'.
[04-24] My dinner with Andreessen: "Billionaires I have known." First of a promised three-part series, "because you really need to know how deeply twisted some of these plutocrats who run our society truly are." Then after sharing the story of their meeting, he concludes: "There is something very, very wrong with us, that our society affords so much pwoer to people like this."
Jeffrey St Clair: [04-19] Roaming Charges: How to kill a wolf in society.
Michael Tatum: Books read (and not read): First post on the author's new blog, "Michael on Everything." Nice supplement to my own last week Book Roundup, especially as he catches books I missed, and writes about them with much more care.
Astra Taylor/Leah Hunt-Hendrix: [03-12] What is solidarity and how does it work?: Introduction to the authors' book, Solidarity: The Past, Present, and Future of a World-Changing Idea. Related:
Daniel Steinmetz-Jenkins: [04-23] Talking "solidarity" with Astra Taylor and Leah Hunt-Hendrix: Interview with the authors.
Li Yuan:
[04-08] What Chinese outrage over '3 Body Problem' says about China: "Instead of demonstrating pride, social media is condemning it." The review also inadvertently says much about America, like how we insist on cartoonishly simple framing of Chinese history, and how we insert more westerners into a Chinese story to make it more "relatable" and still expect them to be thankful for their leftovers. I'm critical enough of America's own chauvinists and sanitizers of history that I disapprove of the same things in other countries -- e.g., the Turkish taboo against so much as mentioning the Armenian genocide -- and I don't doubt that there is some of this same spirit in much of the Chinese reaction. But that hardly give us the right to dictate how they should view their own history, especially as we have so little sense of it.
[02-29] China has thousands of Navalnys, hidden from the public. Of this I have no doubt. Every political system, no matter how coercive, breeds its own dissent. Countries that tolerate and even encourage dissent are often better off, and tend to look down their noses at those who don't, but all countries adjust as they see fit. Unfortunately, many think they can solve their problems through repression, and we have no shortage of people who think like that in America.
Li Zhou: [04-18] Jontay Porter's lifetime NBA ban highlights the risks of sports gambling. Also, evidently, the lure. Jeffrey St Clair says: "People who watch NBA or NHL games are hit with as many as three gambling ads per minute."